8/14/2019 War or Liberty - The Real Choice

1/2

War or Liberty:THE REAL CHOICE

turies several centuries of Peace andProsperity.

But Isolationist America became Imperi-alist America over time. Free Trade Englandbecame the British Empire and ruled theglobe until exhausted by constant war-fare. Its last victory devastated the mother

country and disintegrated its Empire.As long as a State remains, War will

remain. The fundamental choice is betweena State, servitude, and mass murder on theone hand, and Anarchy, freedom, and peaceon the other.

What Can You Do About It?

On the individual level, you can do a lotto deal with War and the State, withoutawaiting the emergence of mass move-ments, changes of heart in politicians, or afull-scale revolution. The Movement of the

Libertarian Left advocates participation inCounter-Economics that weakens or coun-teracts the war machine and war propagan-da, such as:

Tax Rebellion (not just avoidance) Draft Resistance Smuggling (increase Free Trade!) Wage & Price Control Breaking Censorship Evasion Networking with like-minded freedom

fighters and peace activists Dissemination of the revelations of

Revisionist History exposing the dirtylittle manipulations of statists to drag us

into war after war Loosing lips and sinking ships.Break free of the false dichotomy of

Socialist Slavery peace or Capitalist Warfreedom. Enter the agora (true, open freemarket) via Counter-Economics. Educateyourself and your friends about the anar-chist alternative to statism.

This brochure was originally written and pub-lished for MLL by the late Samuel Edward KonkinIII. This new edition has been minimally updatedand edited by Wally Conger.

MOVEMENT OF THE

LIBERTARIAN LEFT

Agora Anarchy Action!

For more informationabout the Movement of

the Libertarian Left,contact:

8/14/2019 War or Liberty - The Real Choice

2/2

W hether you oppose the War or stillsupport your country, you have beengiven a false alternative. For many whostruggle against the War, you have been toldthat only some form of social control willend war and prevent it in the future. Formany who feel their country is threatened

and needs their support, you have been toldthat you must now accept temporary war-time restrictions such as censorship, ra-tioning, and conscription to the eventualend of peace and liberty.

Reality dictates otherwise. History isreplete with examples that show those withmore Liberty defend themselves with zestand fervor. If they are to lose by overwhelm-ing odds, no amount of self-imposed slaverywould save them.

Nor has any form of social control such as State socialism prevented war.History is rapidly filling up with examples of

intra-socialist wars not just between So-cial Democrat and Communist states butbetween Communist states, between SocialDemocratic States, and between other vari-ants and between all of the above.

We all know you must fight for yourfreedom or lose it. But most (though not all)of the Socialist Left and Conservative Rightbelieve the same thing: The State must fightfor your freedom or you will lose it. Theysimply make opposite choices seeminglyallowed them.

War and Slavery

History is unkind to the perpetuation ofthe War or Slavery myth. Countries suchas the United States, whose territory wasuntouched by enemy states, experiencedintense repression. That is, Americans wereconquered and enslaved by their own state.Remember the suspension of habeas corpusby Lincoln in 1861; the mass censorship of1917 and the Palmer Raids of 1919;Roosevelts wage and price controls andnisei concentration camps in 1942-45;Trumans Emergency Powers Act in 1950,

hich allowed the Intelligence Communityto run amok throughout the U.S. in the

1950s and 1960s; the Chicago Conspiracytrials and Kent State shootings duringJohnson & Nixons Vietnam war; and now?Bushs Patriot Act and its offenses against

merican freedoms during the U.S. Statesunending war on terror is but an openingsalvo of the government on its people.

Randolph Bourne said it so well so longago: War is the health of the State.

The best way to lose your freedom is toenslave yourself. Can anyone reasonablydispute that? Yet for whom will, say, an

merican suspend his liberties for theduration: a bureaucrat speaking Arabic or100% American English? And which will theSaudi more likely obey?

Foreign conquest is difficult and expen-sive. Studies of European colonialism ofpre-World-War Africa show total balancebooks of enormous economic loss made upby the European taxpayers. German occu-

pation tied down several divisions of theWehrmacht for years in countries which fellin days when their states defended them.Only where the conquered accepted theirown state as still legitimate (Vichy France,Quisling Norway) were few Germans presentor needed to maintain wartime allegiance.

In the 1980s, the Soviet Union sup-ported puppet regimes unacceptable to Po-land and Afghanistan and thus haddivisions of troops either tied down in occu-pation or tied down to maintain a threat ofimminent invasion. Yet Armenia and Geor-gia, at that time rife with capitalist corrup-tion (i.e., a thriving, nearly open,

Counter-Economy) and with a historic ra-cial enemy nearby they feared more thanthe Russians (though the Poles had Ger-many and the Afghans had India), requiredno threats or occupying force. The morefreedom, the greater the loyalty and depen-dency.

If Russian troops had overwhelmed themerican Army in the 80s, could anyone

have imagined the Russian bureaucracyadministering the American Economy? Con-sider the tens of millions of tax evaders,dope dealers, CB speed-limit evaders, sexsaleswomen (and men), alien workers, mid-

ives, smugglers, and couriers who thrived

under the U.S. State at the time. How coulda Russian occupying force even have under-stood what was going on around them(computer theft? old girls networks? off-the-books and expense accounts?), let alonecontrol it? Note that the Soviets couldnt inthose days even control their own Counter-

Economy, the black-market, left-hand na-levo!

And, it should be added in fair balance,U.S. attempts to occupy Russia in 1920

ere no more successful, nor would theyhave been in the 1980s.

The Causes of War

Threats of foreign domination, ideologi-cal and religious differences, and loss ofinternational face and prestige are justifi-cations for War; they are useful to swingpopular support behind the States Higher

Circles (or power elites or ruling class)decision to fight a War or rather to havesomeone else, volunteers or conscripts, fighta War for them. There has always been onemajor reason for war plunder. And thatis what taxation is. The mechanism for insti-tutionalized plunder is The State, whetherat home or abroad. Hence, the true enemyof War is necessarily the Enemy of the State.

There are partial solutions that werederived over a period of time by worthy andhonorable proto-libertarian radicals. Since

ar causes are so economic, Free Trade is agreat deterrent to war while protectionism

tariffs and import restrictions contrib-ute to war. As one such thinker put it, Ifgoods and services cannot cross borders,armies will.

A restrained or limited State should beless likely to engage in war (and taxation)than a more powerful (i.e., more sanctionedby its subjects) one. In foreign policy, alimited State is known as Isolationist; arelatively unlimited one is Imperialist. ThusIsolationism and Free Trade are the classi-cal liberal answers to prevent war. (Notehow often these complementary positionsare put in false opposition!) Switzerland haspursued both these policies for several cen-