w. suchorzewski, wut, 12.06.2007 29 th november 2005 revenue revenue use from transport pricing 5fp...

15
W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12. 06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Revenue Use from Transport Pricing Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 U U rban case studies rban case studies Warsaw Warsaw Warsaw University of Warsaw University of Technology Technology

Upload: domenic-percival-cooper

Post on 03-Jan-2016

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

29th November 2005

REVENUE REVENUE

Revenue Use from Transport PricingRevenue Use from Transport Pricing

5FP – DGTREN 2004-20055FP – DGTREN 2004-2005

UUrban case studiesrban case studies – Warsaw – Warsaw

Warsaw University of TechnologyWarsaw University of Technology

Page 2: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Revenue – urban case studiesRevenue – urban case studies

Work Package 5 studied four Case Studies of various scale and approach:

• Oslo• Warsaw • Edinburgh• Cross-boundary acceptability

Page 3: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Congestion charging in national transport policy

2001: National Transport Policy for 2001-2015 – sustainable development

tolling: motorways, cities – parking, bridges, cities – parking, bridges, congestion - entrance to city centers congestion - entrance to city centers

2005: National Transport Policy for 2006-2025„in addition to parking fees, tolls for using

motorways and on heavy vehicles - charges charges for entrance to central areas of big cities, for for entrance to central areas of big cities, for crossing selected bridges, etc.crossing selected bridges, etc.”

Page 4: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

WarsawWarsaw

• General objective to validate the feasibility of approaches suggested in the REVENUE project vis-à-vis revenue use from MC pricing

• Proposed regulation schemes: based around the allocation of increased revenue from congestion charging (toll charged at cordon line) for roads / public transport investment

Page 5: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Warsaw• 1,7 million inh, agglomeration 2,5 million• over 400 cars per one thousand inh.• Public transport share – 65% of motorized

trips• Revenues from farebox covering 45% of

operating public transport costs• Congestion charging listed as longterm

measure in transport policy adopted in 1995 but no plans to implement it in visible future

Page 6: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Four options

1. No charging (except parking charging)

2. Charging - toll – 4.5 PLN (€1.12) - cordon around the center – 14 sq. Kms

3. Charging with revenues used to invest in new ring roads

4. Revenues used to upgrade tramway lines to LRT standard

Page 7: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Cordon

Legend

cordon zone

zone in Warsaw

zone in CBD area

zone out side Warsaw

Page 8: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Gates

Legend

City highway

Main road

Collector road

Toll gate section

111111111 Gate No

131313131313131313

999999999

101010101010101010

111111111111111111

121212121212121212

141414141414141414151515151515151515

202020202020202020212121212121212121

151515151515151515

171717171717171717

181818181818181818

191919191919191919

222222222222222222

232323232323232323

242424242424242424

252525252525252525

262626262626262626

777777777

111111111 222222222

333333333

444444444

555555555

666666666

888888888

343434343434343434

323232323232323232

333333333333333333

353535353535353535

303030303030303030

282828282828282828

272727272727272727

292929292929292929

313131313131313131

Page 9: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Findings

Road traffic reduction on the cordon:• introduction of toll – reduction by 30%,• construction of ring road (outer zone) –

impact insignificant No of PT passengers crossing gates to

the CBD area - growth – 5,5 %,• additional tram line on North bridge –

small impact

Page 10: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Findings – speed in peek hour

 option

1option

2option

3option

4

Metropolitan area 48.332 48.883 49.093 48.925

Central area 35.671 36.624 36.801 36.750

City center 31.82 36.409 36.611 36.490

Page 11: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

FindingsSpeed increase (for vehicles):• whole metropolitan area:

– tool – 0,6 km/h, – toll plus bridge on the ring road – 0,8 km/h

• city center: – tool +4,6 km/h, – tool plus bridge + 5 km/h

 

Page 12: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Financial and ecomic analysis

Financial analysis options

Economic analysisoptions

2 3 4 2 3 4

NPV (mln Euro)

482,7 36,2 2,9 -316,8 11,9 16,5

IRR 41,8 9,3 6,3 --- 6,5 6,9

Page 13: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Survey - drivers Should charging be introduced in 5-10 years?

YES NOdon’t know

Total

26% 67% 7% 100%

Toll rate preferred

10 PLN 5 PLN 2 PLNdon’t know

another Total

6% 13% 31% 13% 37% 100%

How to use revenues?

roads100%

roads - 50% PT - 50%

PT – 100%

mayor’s decissio

nother Total

52% 15% 7% 3% 22% 100%

Page 14: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

Survey - stakeholders Should charging be introduced in 5-10 years?

YES NOdon’t know

Total

85% 11% 4% 100%

Appropriate toll rate

10 PLN 5 PLN 2 PLNdon’t know

another Total

20% 46% 19% 0% 15% 100%How to use revenues?

roads100%

roads - 50% PT - 50%

PT – 100%

mayor’s decissio

nother Total

4% 45% 35% 4% 11% 100%

Page 15: W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007 29 th November 2005 REVENUE Revenue Use from Transport Pricing 5FP – DGTREN 2004-2005 Urban case studies – Warsaw Warsaw

W. Suchorzewski, WUT, 12.06.2007

Warsaw - main findings

• Under present traffic and economic conditions the social benefits of cordon charging would be limited.

• The financial viability and attitude of stakeholders towards the charging concept may stimulate decision makers to implement charging

• The direction of EU / National transport policies are important influences which could help stimulate introducing of fiscal measures.