uvcmodule3.2
TRANSCRIPT
what happened?
OK, class today did not go as planned. That may be an understatement.
What I decided to do was to add text to this powerpoint, in place of the lecture.
If you have questions, please email me at:
and I am happy to talk with you too, if you want to set up an appointment.
Jan Vermeer, Girl with a Pearl Earring,
c. 1665-6, oil on canvas, 17 1/2 x 15 3/8 inches
Jan van Eyck, Mary Crowned, completed 1432
This is where we left off last time, with the growing interest of of painters in people
who are not significant figures from religion, history, or mythology.
from traditional European art to
modern art, what changes?
even before the dramatic shift in the 20th
century, you can see a significant change in subject matter
though artists still paint portraits of royals and nobles, and scenes from the Bible, classical mythology, and important historical moments
they ALSO show significant interest in ordinary people leading ordinary lives.
Spanish painter Diego Velázquez is a good example.
The little princess, the
Infanta Margaret Theresa,
is at the center.
Immediately surrounding
her are two maids of honor.
To the right are two little
people, who were part of
her entourage. Her dog lies
in front, and her governess
and bodyguard stand in the
shadows behind the group.
Diego VELÁZQUEZ, Las Meninas, 1656, Museo del Prado
oil on canvas, 125.2 in × 108.7 inches
The Queen’s Chamberlain
stands on the steps at the
back right of the room; the
royal parents of the
princess are reflected in
the mirror hanging on the
rear wall; and the artist,
painting a huge canvas,
stands at the left.
Diego VELÁZQUEZ, Las Meninas, 1656,
Museo del Prado
oil on canvas, 125.2 in × 108.7 inches
Diego Velázquez, Portrait of Juan de Pareja, c. 1650Juan de Pareja
(1606–1670)
Assisted Velazquez in
his studio.
Was a painter in his
own right.
When Velázquez
painted this beautiful
portrait of him (which
today is in the Met in
NYC), he was a slave
in Velázquez’s house
and workshop.
Diego Velázquez, Portrait of Juan de Pareja, c. 1650Juan de Pareja
(1606–1670)
But Velázquez still
wanted to paint him,
still saw his essential
human dignity, still saw
beyond the society that
divided them into
different worlds.
Velázquez freed Juan
de Pareja in November
1650, although the
document of
manumission required
Pareja to serve
Velázquez for another 4
years. As it turned out,
Pareja remained in the
household until
Velázquez’s death, and
continued to serve his
son afterward.
Diego Velázquez, Surrender of Breda, 1634-5,
oil on canvas, Museo del Prado, Madrid
Velazquez painted this picture for the Spanish King, Philip IV (wearing the black armor
with the pink sash) in commemoration of a major military victory over the Dutch after a
year’s siege of the town of Breda.
But notice, that even though the King is pictured at the center with the conquered town
laid out behind him, Velazquez includes many striking portraits of common soldiers and
even their horses. Though the picture commemorates an important historical event,
Velazquez includes many characters who would not be considered “great men of
history.”
Diego VELÁZQUEZ, Los Borrachos (The Drinkers), 1629
Here Velázquez includes the guys from the local tavern in his mythological picture
of the Roman God of wine, Bacchus. He imagines the classical together with the
contemporary.
Goya stands in the shadows, looking out at us. He isn’t one of them,
and he paints exactly what he sees in the royal family.
Francisco de GOYA
The Countess of
Chinchón
1800
oil on canvas
216 cm x 144 cm
All the silks and jewels
in Spain can’t save the
Countess from loneliness,
despair and isolation.
Èdouard MANET
Corner of a Café-Concert
1878-1879
National Gallery, London
oil on canvas
38.4 × 30.5 inches
Three quarters of a century later,
Manet paints a cocktail waitress
lost in thought while serving
customers in a busy café. She
too is alone despite the crowds
in the café.
Jean-Baptiste Greuze, The Punished Son, 1777, Louvre, 51x64"
Here Greuze takes a dramatic moment in the life of an ordinary family and makes a
history painting out of it, elevating the domestic scene to the level of history.
Jacques Louis DAVID, Death of Socrates, 1787, Met, 51x77"
Despite Greuze’s example, many popular artists still made history paintings
commemorating the lives of heroic figures, such as Socrates, the Greek philosopher
who goes bravely to his death in this picture, surrounded by his followers and friends.
Thomas Couture, Romans of the Decadence, 1847
Over time, however, this kind of mythological, classical subject comes to seem less
and less relevant. Even the spicy subject matter of the Roman orgy comes to seem
fairly ridiculous.
Claude MONET
Garden at Sainte-
Adresse
1867
Oil on canvas
38 5/8 x 51 1/8 in
The Impressionists signaled a major change, as you can see here. They are like a
breath of fresh air into the art world, which in this picture takes the literal form of the
crisp seaside breeze that the well-dressed tourists are enjoying on summer vacation.
We are in the modern world now, bright, light, and always changing, as quickly as the
weather does.
Claude MONET, Impression: Sunrise, 1872
The Impressionists also become interested in capturing atmospheric effects, like dawn
and twilight, and all types of different weather conditions. Now that photography can
capture the literal appearance of things, artists are freer to experiment.
Claude MONET
The Saint-Lazare Station
1877
Oil on canvas
H. 75; W. 104 cm
If we want to document the precise appearance of this train station, we can make
a photograph (and there are many photographs of urban Paris at this time. However,
if we want to feel some of the hectic quality of the train station, the crowds, and clouds
of smoke, we might turn to Monet’s picture instead.
J.M.W. TURNER
Rain, Steam and
Speed, 1844 oil on
canvas
36 × 48 inches
National Gallery,
London
Working in England at an even earlier date, Turner also becomes interested in the
look and feel of various forms of weather, to the point that portions of his canvases
verge on abstraction.
J.M.W. Turner, The Burning of the Houses of Parliament, 1835
Here Turner renders the giant fire that consumed the British Parliament in
dramatic oranges. The buildings themselves are barely visible among the flames.
James Abbott MacNeill WHISTLER
(American, living in London)
Nocturne in Black and Gold: The
Falling Rocket
1875
Whistler’s paintings push even
farther into gorgeous abstractions
full of color and texture that entice
the eye while scarcely resolving into
a recognizable picture.
Claude MONET, Waterlilies, c. 1920, MoMA, NYC
Monet’s late pictures of waterlilies floating on the pond in his garden push toward
abstract painting as well.
"A picture, before being a war horse, a nude
woman, or some anecdote, is essentially a flat
surface covered by colors in a certain order.”
—Maurice Denis
Vincent van GOGH
(Dutch, 1853–1890)
La Berceuse (Woman
Rocking a Cradle,
1889 oil on canvas,
36 1/2 x 29 inches
Vincent van Gogh
Portrait of Joseph Roulin
1889
Oil on canvas
25 3/8 x 21 ¾”
Depth becomes less
important as surface
and background seem
to melt together.
Georges SEURAT, Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte, 1884
Though Seurat uses conventional perspective to create the illusion of depth, his figures
seem to lack volume and appear to be cardboard cutouts.
Paul GAUGUIN 1848 – 1903
Vision after the sermon
oil on canvas (73 × 92 cm) — 1888
National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh
Paul GAUGUIN Vision after the sermon
1888
National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh
Other painters not only
flatten the canvas and
use surprising spatial
effects but also do so
to emphasize the
otherworldliness of this
world, suggesting a
latent spiritual potential.
Paul Cézanne, Gulf of Marseilles seen from L’Estaque, c.1885, oil on canvas, 31.5 × 39.2 in
Cézanne sees the French landscape in terms of geometric solids and brings
a new sense of structure and solidity to the bright French landscape.
Picasso, Portrait of Wilhelm Uhde, 1910
Catalan artist Pablo PICASSO
had no difficulty painting
representational pictures,
abstractions, and everything in
between. Here he fragments the
portrait of one of his art dealers
into rectangles and triangles.
Over time he will oscillate back and
forth between styles in a seemingly
effortless manner.
Pablo PICASSO, Still Life with Chair Caning, 1912
For this collage, Picasso used wallpaper that imitated chair caning, and wrapped the
whole canvas in real rope. The other portions are painted in imitation of various objects
that might be found on a tabletop.
Picasso, Bottle of Vieux Marc, Glass, Guitar and Newspaper, 1913, Picasso, Bottle of Vieux Marc, Glass, Guitar and Newspaper, 1913
Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, 1912 Duchamp, Bottle Rack, 1914
Marcel Duchamp realizes that the dynamic forms that interest him can be
found in actual objects just as well as in painting.
Duchamp, Tu M’, 1918
This picture plays with illusion and reality, including a found object that sticks directly
out of the painting. The question Duchamp asks here: why paint a representation of
the object if you can just use the real thing?
René Magritte, The Treachery of Images, 1928-9
In his own way, Belgian artist Magritte asks a similar question, drawing attention
to the fact that the painting of a pipe can never be a real pipe.
Artists begin to feel a great freedom to use paint in different ways, or even to forget
about painting and use pictures clipped from magazines to express their ideas.
There are many different ways to put a recognizable figure together, and artists are
drawn to the challenge of finding new methods rather than relying on the old ones.
Fernand LÉGER, The Red Table, 1920. AIC
While some artists experiment with different ways
of breaking down a scene and putting it back together,
others question the need for a subject altogether.
Why not just paint colors and shapes, for their own
beauty?
“There is no such thing as ‘abstract,’ or ‘concrete’… There is a good picture and a bad picture. There is the picture that moves you and the picture that leaves you cold… A picture has a value in itself, like a musical score, like a poem.”
—Fernand Léger
Here French artist Léger tries to explain that it doesn’t really matter whether a
picture has
Grosz and Heartfield
Dada Picture
c. 1919
collage
cover design, exhibition catalog for First International Dada Fair, 1920
First International Dada Fair, Berlin, June 1920, with participating artists
John Heartfield
AIZ (Arbeiters Illustrierte Zeitung)
The Meaning of the Hitler Salute:
Millions Stand Behind Me, Little Man
Asks for Big Donations
John Heartfield
Hitler’s Dove of Peace
cover image Jan 31. 1935
AIZ
John Heartfield
Those Who Read Bourgeois
Newspapers Become Deaf and Dumb
1930
John Heartfield
Adolf, the Superman, Swallows
Gold and Spouts Junk
1932
John Heartfield
The Reichsbishop Drills Christendom
1934
John Heartfield
The Thousand-Year Reich
cover image of AIZ
September 20, 1934
John Heartfield
O Christmas Tree in German
room, how crooked are your branches
1934
John Heartfield
Black or White, in Struggle United
1931
Hannah HÖCH
Das schöne Mädchen
1920
Hannah Höch
Bourgeois Wedding
Couple (Quarrel)
1919
Hannah Höch
Cut with the Kitchen Knife
Dada Through the Last
Weimar Beer-Belly
Cultural Epoch of
Germany
1919-1920
Hannah Höch, Collage, c. 1920
Kur SCHWITTERS
Merz 32A (Cherry Picture)
1921
collage of colored papers,
fabrics, printed labels and
pictures, pieces of wood,
etc., and gouache on
cardboard background
36-1/8 x 27-3/4”
The Museum of Modern Art,
New York
Max Ernst (French, born
Germany. 1891-1976)
Two Children Are Threatened
by a Nightingale (Deux enfants
sont menacés par un rossignol),
1924.
© The Museum of Modern Art,
New York
Max ERNST
The Virgin Spanking the Christ Child
before Three Witnesses: Andre
Breton, Paul Eluard, and the Painter
1926
oil on canvas
Salvador DALI, Lobster Telephone, 1936
“I do not understand why, when I ask for a grilled lobster in a restaurant, I
am never served a cooked telephone; I do not understand why
champagne is always chilled and why on the other hand telephones,
which are habitually so frightfully warm and disagreeably sticky to the
touch, are not also put in silver buckets with crushed ice around them.”
Meret Oppenheim (Swiss, 1913–1985)
Object
Paris, 1936
Fur-covered cup, saucer, and spoon
© 2014 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / Pro Litteris, Zurich
I don’t like that word, “finish.” When
something is finished, that means it’s
dead, doesn’t it? I believe in
everlastingness. I never finish a
painting—I just stop working on it for a
while.
Arshile Gorky, 1948
Willem de Kooning
(American, b. The Netherlands,
1904-1997).
Woman, I, 1950-52
Oil on canvas
75 7/8 x 58 inches
“…if you pick up some paint with your brush and
make somebody's nose with it, this is rather ridiculous
when you think of it, theoretically or philosophically. It's
really absurd to make an image, like a human image,
with paint, today, when you think about it, since we
have this problem of doing it or not doing it. But then
all of a sudden it was even more absurd not to do it.
So I fear I have to follow my desires.”
—Willem de Kooning,
in a 1962 radio interview
Like Léger before him, de Kooning points
out that it doesn’t really matter if a painting
has a subject or not.
Key points
• Imbrication of art and commerce
• constant cross-pollination between elite and popular culture
• moving past realist modes of representation (post-photographic)
• development of self-reflective capacity
• critical perspectives on the treatment of women and non-whites in previous art
• awareness of the power of representation to shape belief
E.V. Day,
Flesh for Fantasy
1999
Four blowup lovedolls and
stainless steel surgical wire
The pink vinyl flesh of two girls
and two boys is shredded into
fragments of varying degrees of
recognition and strewn through
out a room into what I hope will
be an explosive orgy. The
fragments are hung with
stainless steel steel surgical
wire, normally used for stitching
human bones. The wires are
connected to turn buckles in a
heart shaped configuration in
the floor, and shoot out
chaotically to the ceiling. "Flesh
for Fantasy" is situated in a
room with four entrances that
allows the viewer to pass
through and around the
installation from all directions.
E.V. Day, Flesh for Fantasy, 2000
Blow-up dolls, surgical wire, hooks
Titian, Venus of Urbino, 1538
Oil on canvas
El Lissitzky, Kurt Schwitters,
1924
Kurt Schwitters (1887-
1948)
Hanover, Germany
Kunstakademie, Dresden (Otto Dix and George Grosz)
Associated with Dada movement
Declared “degenerate artist”
Fled to Norway, then the UK
These interiors were built into
Schwitters’ family home in Hanover
starting in 1923.
He fled to Norway in 1937, and the
house was destroyed by Allied bombs
in 1943.
He called these strange assemblages
of wood, plaster and found objects
“Merzbau.”
Robert Rauschenberg, Monogram 1955-59, mixed mediums with taxidermy goat, rubber tire and tennis ball
Robert RAUSCHENBERG
Pilgrim
1960
Rauschenberg called these
mixed media works “combines.”
In them he directly juxtaposes
fragments of the “real world”
with paintings. He seems to be
questioning the limits and
possibilities of both modes.
Edward KIENHOLZ
State Hospital
1966, interior view
Here Kienholz uses found
materials to express outrage
at modern institutions. The
materials are repulsive, but they
make an undeniably artistic
statement.
Review
You can use the following slides, all linked around the
theme of smoking, to help you reconstruct the
development of modern art and the various changes it
goes through.
Gustave COURBET
Portrait of the Artist (Man with a Pipe)
c. 1848-49
Oil on canvas
17 3/4 x 14 5/8 in
Musee Fabre, Montpellier
Cézanne, Paul
Man with a Pipe
Circa 1892-96
Oil on canvas
73 cm x 60 cm
The Courtauld Gallery,
London
Pablo Picasso
(Spanish, worked in France, 1881–1973)
Man with a Pipe
1915
Oil on canvas
51 1/4 x 35 1/4 in.
René Magritte (Belgium, 1898-1967)
The Treachery of Images (This is Not a Pipe)
1929
Oil on canvas, 23 3/4 x 31 15/16 inches