utah broadband project nsgic 2011 presentation

43
Utah Broadband Project: Mapping Update Bert Granberg Utah AGRC

Upload: bert-granberg

Post on 16-Apr-2017

417 views

Category:

Technology


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Utah Broadband Project:Mapping Update

Bert GranbergUtah AGRC

Page 2: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Broadband Mapping: Provider Participation in Utah’s April 2011 NTIA Data Submission

• Comcast• Covad• Digis• Direct

Communications• Emery• Frontier• Gtelco

(Gunnison)• Hughes• InfoWest• Integra• Leap/Cricket• Level3• Manti• Myvocom• Nebonet• River Canyon

Wireless

• SatView• Skywire• SouthCentral• Spanish Fork• Sprint/Nextel• Strata• T-Mobile• ThreeSixty• Union• Utah Broadband• Utopia• Veracity• Verizon• Wild Blue• XOCommunications• XpressWeb

• ATC (Albion)• AllWest• Altazip• American Fiber• AT&T• Baja• Beehive• Bresnan• Cache

Broadband• Catapulsion• CentraCom• CenturyLink• Clearwire

Page 3: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Data Submissions:Service Areas, Speeds, Tech TypeInfrastructure, Anchor Institutions, etc.

Electronic Upload

Pen&

Ink

Web Conference Map Views

• April 1, 2010• October 1, 2010• April 1, 2011• October 1, 2011

Page 4: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Where does the data go?

• National Broadband Map (FCC/NTIA)

• Utah Broadband Map

• State Broadband Policy Making Planning / Business Recruitment

• Other Analysis/ Uses (data is public)

Page 5: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Ove

rall

Sta

te C

over

age

Page 6: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Ser

vice

By

Add

ress

Page 7: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Tech

nolo

gy +

Spe

ed F

ilter

: Wire

less

Page 8: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Pro

vide

r Filt

er: R

ural

Tel

ecom

s

Page 9: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Pro

vide

r Filt

er: R

ural

Tel

ecom

s

Page 10: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

10 Day Update Cycle

Page 11: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Maximum Advertised Speed Map Technology Hierarchy Map

Page 12: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Broadband Availability Analysis

Page 13: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

2010 Census Block Data

Page 14: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Process

• For each Census Block:– How many providers serve it?– At what speed?– Using what technology(s)

• Summarize Pop. & Housing Units for– Counties– Cities– Unincorporated Named Places (ex. Brighton, Magna)

Page 15: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

“Trimmed Census Blocks”

• Only Populated Census Blocks• population and housing unit counts

• Visually ‘Trim’ Unpopulated Areas • Improved Demographic Density Capability

Before After

Page 16: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Results

Page 17: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Class #1: Basic Consumer • Case1HUPct

– Percentage of housing units within place that are served by internet with:

• 3 mbps+ download speeds, and • 0.768 mbps+ upload speeds

Page 18: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 19: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Class #2: Home Office/Entertainment

• Case2HUPct– Percentage of housing units within place that are

served by internet with:

• 10 mbps+ download speeds, and • 3 mbps+ upload speeds

Page 20: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 21: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mobile Wireless AvailabilityJuly 2011 Field Tests

Page 22: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Background

• Sub Contractor:– Selected through competitive bid

• Isotrope, LLC (Medfield, MA)

• Test Plan, Details testing procedures

• Test Period:– July 4th – July 23rd 2011

• What was tested:– CDMA, EVDO, GSM, GPRS/EDGE/UMTS, HSPA & LTE– Comparable consumer grade ‘smart phones’ from 6 carriers– ZK Test’s ZK SAMp test/logging platform

Page 23: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Utah Broadband Project: Drive Testing Goals

• Goals:

– Obtain footprint for different mobile bb technologies• Verification of mobile bb provider data submissions• Inferred voice availability

– Gather performance data for typical ‘consumer experience’

• Signal strength• Speed

Page 24: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mobile Broadband, 2011 Drive Testing Routes

Page 25: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Drive Testing, July 4 – July 23, 2010

• 9328 miles driven 7 million observation pts• 50 Gb of data thru put• 3 road closures• 1 gas outage…0 speeding tickets

Page 26: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology

Page 27: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapping Infrastructure: Signal Strength

A function of:• Tower distance• Antennae direction• Obstruction• Environment• Power levels• Congestion

Page 28: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapping Infrastructure: Down/Up Link Speed

A function of:• Signal Strength• Tech/Protocol• Congestion• Transaction length

Page 29: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

PSAP Status Maps w/ Wireless Availability Estimation

April 2011 Broadband Data: Mobile Wireless

April 2010 American Roamer Cellular Coverage+

Mobile Voice/BB Availability is Critical for 911 Dispatch

Page 30: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

May 2011: • 421000 points• 11 complete counties• 3 partial counties

Building Statewide Address Points Using Statewide Address Points

July 2011• Address Pts in used by statewide geocoding web service

• PSAPs, esp. Regional Dispatch

• SST/MTSA

• Statewide Voters DB

Maintaining Statewide Address Points Address Point Standards

• Addressing Stnrd Data Model

• Address System !

• Tiered

• Keep it Simple !

Voters DB Feedback Loop:• Clerks• Integrated Map & Web Services• Web Service Δ Reports

PSAPs, 911 Comm.

vote

Address Points

Page 31: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation
Page 32: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapping Infrastructure: Available Technology

Page 33: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Competition

• TwoPlusHUPct– Percentage of housing units within county that have 2

or more providers offering services

Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet

Page 34: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 35: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Class #3: Higher Capacity

• Case3HUPct– Percentage of housing units within place that are

served by internet with:

• 25 mbps+ download speeds, and • 10 mbps+ upload speeds

Page 36: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 37: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

ServicesClasses

Map

Note: This map does not currently show class assignments for unincorporated, unnamed areas

Page 38: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mapped Broadband Technologies

Page 39: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Mobile Availability

• MobileHUPct– Percentage of housing units within county that have

broadband qualifying mobile wireless service

Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet

Page 40: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 41: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Unserved

• UnservHUPct– Percentage of housing units within county that DO

NOT have broadband qualifying service

• < 0.768 mbps download speeds, and • < 0.200 mbps upload speeds

Percentage of housing units within place that have available mobile wireless internet

UnservHUPct

Page 42: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

County % of State MobileHUPct UnservHUPct

TwoPlusHUPct NtiaHUPct Case1HUPct Case2HUPct Case3HUPct

BEAVER 0.24% 99.38% 0.55% 99.41% 99.45% 99.45% 98.10% 0.00%

BOX ELDER 1.81% 99.27% 0.21% 98.74% 99.79% 99.72% 79.92% 78.79%

CACHE 4.08% 99.85% 0.15% 99.79% 99.85% 99.84% 90.30% 90.30%

CARBON 0.78% 99.20% 0.06% 99.19% 99.94% 99.94% 6.44% 6.44%

DAGGETT 0.04% 77.48% 3.27% 77.48% 96.73% 75.30% 0.00% 0.00%

DAVIS 11.10% 99.94% 0.06% 99.94% 99.94% 99.94% 98.52% 98.32%

DUCHESNE 0.65% 94.09% 0.37% 81.40% 99.63% 92.16% 0.00% 0.00%

EMERY 0.40% 98.16% 1.15% 97.79% 98.85% 98.11% 6.01% 6.01%

GARFIELD 0.19% 55.68% 5.22% 53.63% 94.78% 78.29% 52.19% 0.00%

GRAND 0.33% 98.97% 1.03% 96.88% 98.97% 98.97% 0.00% 0.00%

IRON 1.67% 98.71% 0.57% 91.92% 99.43% 99.43% 92.58% 0.00%

JUAB 0.37% 89.30% 1.07% 88.86% 98.93% 96.57% 52.57% 52.57%

KANE 0.26% 88.43% 3.64% 78.42% 96.36% 96.36% 25.22% 0.00%

MILLARD 0.45% 98.85% 0.78% 96.93% 99.22% 98.58% 0.00% 0.00%

MORGAN 0.34% 99.93% 0.07% 99.46% 99.93% 99.83% 84.91% 84.91%

PIUTE 0.06% 46.93% 2.59% 88.44% 97.41% 97.41% 0.00% 0.00%

RICH 0.08% 94.42% 1.01% 93.99% 98.99% 98.68% 32.97% 26.70%

SALT LAKE 37.29% 99.96% 0.04% 99.96% 99.96% 99.96% 98.75% 98.66%

SAN JUAN 0.53% 76.62% 15.36% 58.58% 84.64% 76.62% 0.00% 0.00%

SANPETE 1.01% 99.93% 0.07% 98.36% 99.93% 99.93% 37.73% 37.68%

SEVIER 0.75% 99.26% 0.74% 98.88% 99.26% 99.26% 0.00% 0.00%

SUMMIT 1.31% 99.72% 0.07% 99.17% 99.93% 99.76% 97.19% 74.03%

TOOELE 2.11% 99.78% 0.17% 99.54% 99.83% 99.56% 84.89% 81.66%

UINTAH 1.18% 99.27% 0.62% 90.97% 99.38% 97.72% 0.00% 0.00%

UTAH 18.70% 99.87% 0.12% 99.79% 99.88% 99.79% 92.42% 89.55%

WASATCH 0.85% 99.96% 0.04% 99.65% 99.96% 99.90% 92.21% 68.92%

WASHINGTON 4.99% 99.38% 0.16% 98.95% 99.84% 99.77% 98.25% 3.82%

WAYNE 0.10% 36.02% 18.04% 34.07% 81.96% 77.55% 0.00% 0.00%

WEBER 8.32% 99.39% 0.61% 99.34% 99.39% 99.34% 92.76% 92.76%

DR

AFT

Page 43: Utah Broadband Project NSGIC 2011 Presentation

Fall 2011 Mapping Initiatives

• Interactive Map– Addition of Community Anchor Institutions

• Highlight capability within Rural Areas– Generalized Speed Test “weather map” ??

• Explore Business Recruitment-oriented infrastructure map concept– Fiber-served backbone served areas– Redundancy

• Address Point dataset grants to counties• Sharing mobile drive test data to respective providers

and partners (Public Safety, etc)