using pbn in upr application, success and lessons learned – fiji [email protected]
TRANSCRIPT
USING PBN in UPR APPLICATION, USING PBN in UPR APPLICATION, SUCCESS and LESSONS LEARNED SUCCESS and LESSONS LEARNED
– – FIJI FIJI
[email protected]@caaf.org.fj
2
OutlineOutline
South Pacific FIRSouth Pacific FIR Nadi (NFFF) Oceanic FIR – OverviewNadi (NFFF) Oceanic FIR – Overview PBN in UPR Application – SuccessesPBN in UPR Application – Successes PBN in UPR Application – Lessons PBN in UPR Application – Lessons
Learned Learned
3
South Pacific FIRSouth Pacific FIR
Nadi (NFFF) Oceanic FIR - OverviewNadi (NFFF) Oceanic FIR - Overview
ATM DOT SYSTEM – 1994 PACOTS – 1994 50NM RNAV (Trials) – 1995 Datalink – 1996 ATM EUROCAT SYSTEM – 2000
Datalink ADS-C AIDC 2002
RNAV10 (RNP10) – 2003 RNP 4 – 2005 Avg. 80 flights/day – 15% FANS1/A
Nadi (NFFF) Oceanic FIR - OverviewNadi (NFFF) Oceanic FIR - Overview
ATM AURORA SYSTEM – 2010 Datalink ADS-C AIDC
Block Levels ADS-B Conflict Probe
Avg 100 flights/day – 32% FANS1/A May 2015 Avg 106 flights/day – 40% FANS1/A
PBN in UPR Application - SuccessesPBN in UPR Application - Successes
Collaborative transitions (PACOTs, UPR, RNP etc) with adjacent FIR ATM System timely upgrade to meet UPR demands
ATC upskilled to handle complex conflictions Enhanced tracking and monitoring capability Efficient coordination of near boundary events via AIDC Improved airspace usage by ATC, direct routes to avoidconflicts Improved weather deviation response times & distance(s)
PBN in UPR Application - SuccessesPBN in UPR Application - Successes
Capacity for mixed operations environment with Non-UPR Operations Approval Process of National Carrier (737/A330) Expansion of UPR to more operators and city pairs Considerable benefits realized immediately by operators
Use of optimum route-levels Cruise climb – Block Levels
ADS-B ITP successful trials Efficiency balance – all airlines, every day !
PBN in UPR Application – Lessons LearnedPBN in UPR Application – Lessons Learned
PBN in UPR Implementation more effective with key stakeholders involved with planning and implementation – Airspace Users, ANSPs, State CAA, Aviation Organizations (IATA etc)
PBN awareness/training crucial for key stakeholders to avoid misunderstanding of requirements
Coordination with key Regional partners/bodies beneficial to States – utilize resources on offer by States, Regional bodies
Regulatory framework is essential to garner compliance from key stakeholders
Operations Approval of National Carrier could have been coordinated sooner with CAA
PBN in UPR Application – Lessons LearnedPBN in UPR Application – Lessons Learned
Connectivity to domestic route structure – timely implementation crucial to seamless operations (ATS)
Timeliness by ANSP and Operators in sharing data analyzed crucial to future planning
Delay in expansion to Fiji carrier Non-UPR capable aircraft not fully explored and currently being undertaken
Ilaitia TabakaucoroATM Inspector – ATM, AIS-AIM, PBN, PANS-OPSCAA [email protected]
THANK YOU.. ?THANK YOU.. ?