using learning self-assessment tools during initial ... · approach learning (dembo, 2001). to...
TRANSCRIPT
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
111
Teacher Education Quarterly, Fall 2013
Shifting Attention:Using Learning Self-Assessment Tools
during Initial Coursework to FocusTeacher Candidates on Student Learning
By Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
Allison J. Kelaher-Young is a professor in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Educational Studies of the College of Education and Human Development at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. Cynthia L. Carver is an assistant professor in the Department of Educational Leadership of the School of Education and Human Services at Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan.
Introduction Therelentlesspressforsteadilyimprovedstudentlearningoutcomesrequiresthatprospectiveteachersenter theclassroomknowinghowtofine-tunetheirteaching to meet the learning needs of individualstudents. Frequently, teacher candidates have dif-ficulty conceptualizing their students as learners,lookingmoreimmediatelytotheirownperformanceas teachers (Fuller, l969; Kagan, l992; Oosterheert&Vermunt,2001).AsRossandBruce(2007)argue,self-assessmentcanbeaneffectivetechniqueforinflu-encingimprovementsinself-efficacy,goalsetting,andeffortregulationamongteachers.Appliedtoteacherpreparation,weexaminedtheuseoftwolearningself-assessmenttoolsinearlyteachereducationcourseworktoexaminethebenefitsofencouragingcandidatestoreflectontheirownlearninginordertosupportthelearningoftheirfuturestudents. Previousresearchinteachereducationarguesthat
Shifting Attention
112
self-assessmentplaysacriticalroleinacompetencies-basedcurriculumbecauseitrequirescandidatestoanalyzetheirownperformances(Airsian&Gullickson,1994;Ross&Bruce,2007;Sluijsmans,Dochy,&Moerkerke,1999).ConceptuallyderivedfromworkbySchön(1983,1987)onthereflectivepractitioner,byElliot(1978)onteacherself-monitoring,andbyRogers(1983)onpromotingpersonalresponsibilityforlearning,self-assessmentmaybeacriticalfeatureindevelopingteacherswhopracticeandpromoteself-regulatedlearning.Itiscrucial,then,forteachercandidatestoexploreideasaboutthemselvesaslearnerstohelpunderstandideasaboutcognition,motivation,andotherconceptsrelatedtoself-regulatedlearn-ing(Dembo,2001;Gordon,Dembo,&Hocevar,2007;Zimmerman,Bonner&Kovach,1996).Toinfluenceconceptualchangeincandidates,wemusthelpthemtoarticulatetheirideasaboutlearnersandlearning(Dole&Sinatra,l998).
Self-Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning
in Teacher Education Teacher preparation programs have the shared goal of helping candidatesthinkandactflexiblyacrossanexpansiveknowledgeandskillbasethatincludesstudentlearningandmotivation,educationalgoalsandpurposes,subjectmatterunderstanding,curriculumandassessment,generalandsubject-specificpedagogy,childdevelopment,culturalproficiency,andorganizationalculture.Acentraltaskofteacherpreparationistoexposecandidatestothewiderangeofunderstandingsandskillstheywillneedtoteachwell.Thistransferofknowledgetopracticeisnotautomatic,however,ascandidatesbringwiththemasetoftacitandoftenstubbornbeliefsaboutteaching,learningandschooling(Lortie,l975).Thus,asecondtaskofteacherpreparationistohelpcandidatesanalyzetheirbeliefssothattheycanlaythefoundationforateachingpracticethatalignswiththeirgoals.AsFeiman-Nemser(2001)notes,
…[P]rospectiveteachersneedopportunitiestocriticallyexaminetheirtaken-for-granted,oftendeeplyentrenchedbeliefssothatthesebeliefscanbedevelopedoramended.Teachercandidatesmustalsoformvisionsofwhatispossibleanddesirableinteachingtoinspireandguidetheirprofessionallearningandpractice.Suchvisionsconnectimportantvaluesandgoalstoconcreteclassroompractices.(p.l017)
Examiningteachercandidates’beliefsaboutstudentlearningandtheirimplica-tionsforteachingprovidesacriticalfoundationforongoingpreparationandlearning.OosterheertandVermunt(2001)arguethatashiftinteacherconcerntypicallymovesfromconcernsaboutself,toconcernsaboutteaching,andfinallytoconcernsaboutstudentlearning(seealsoFuller,l969;Kagan,l992).Asweargueinthispaper,self-assessmentcanhelptoshiftcandidateconcernsfromselftostudents. Atalllevels,teachersareresponsibleforhelpingtheirstudentstolearnbothcontentandhowto learn thecontent.Toexplicitlymodel the learningprocess,
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
113
teachersmustfirstunderstandthemselvesaslearnerswhoareproactive,self-aware,andstrategicinselectingtheprocessesandresourcesthatenablethemtoreachtheirlearninggoals.Aslearners,teacherssetprofessionalgoals,monitortheirdevelopingunderstandingsabouttheteachingandlearningprocess,engageinself-assessment,andadapttodifferentinstructionaldemandsbecausetheyhaveanarrayoflearningstrategiesfromwhichtooperate.Inshort,teacherswhoengageintheseprocessesareactingasself-regulated(Cleary&Zimmerman,2002;Zimmerman2002)andmeaning-directed(Vermunt&Vermetten,2004)learners. Ourperceptionasinstructors,however,isthatasignificantnumberofcandi-datesenterteacherpreparationwiththemindsetofstudentsandnotlearners.Thesecandidatesengageinwhatwerefertoas“studenting”behavior,whichissimilartoacombinationofVermuntandVermetten’s(2004)reproduction-directedandundirectedlearningpatterns.Incontrastwithself-regulatedormeaning-directedlearners,studentsfocuson“jumpingthehoops”necessarywhileusingtheleastamountofeffort.These individualsareoftenminimallyengaged indevelopingnewunderstandings,lookingonlytofulfillbasicinstructionaldemandsbycram-mingforexamsorwritingpapersthenightbeforetheyaredue.Studentsareoftenlessadaptiveinthattheyreportapplyingthesamelearningstrategiesindifferentcontexts,whetherornottheyareeffective.1
Teachereducation,then,musthelpcandidates“…developandchangetheirexisting frame of reference in accordance with current understanding of whatconstitutesgoodteachingandlearning”(Oosterheert&Vermunt,2001,p.134).Ifitistruethatteachersteachthewaytheyweretaught,thenitisimportantforcandidatestoexplorehowtheyhavebeentaughtandmorespecifically,howtheyapproachlearning(Dembo,2001).Todate,fewpedagogicaltoolsexistforhelpingteachersassessthemselvesaslearnersandtheirinstructionalpracticeswithrespecttostudentlearning(Weinberger&McCombs,2003). Bystudying theroleofself-assessmentasadeliberate interventionduringteacher preparation coursework, we address McLaughlin’s (2002) concern that“researchonteachers’learningtypicallyismoreconcernedaboutthecontentofteachers’learningthanwiththeprocessesthatstimulate,supportandsustainit”(pp.95-96).Ultimately,byhelpingprospectiveteacherstorecognizeandexploretheirmotivationalbeliefsandstrategiesaroundlearning,webelievetheywillbebetterpreparedtonotonlysupporttheirstudents’learning,buttoalsosupporttheirownlearningtoteach(Beijaard,Verloop,&Vermunt,1999;Feiman-Nemser,2001).
Connecting Theory to Practice through Self-Assessment Self-assessmentcanalsohelpteachercandidatesconnecttheorytopractice.Specifically,BoudandFalchikov(1989)arguethatconceptualself-assessmental-lowsteachercandidatestodevelopcompetenciesinreflection,self-monitoring,andself-regulatedlearning.Oneofthefirstcoursesinateacherpreparationprogram
Shifting Attention
114
isoftenindevelopmentaloreducationalpsychologywhereteachercandidatesareintroducedtotheformalstudyoflearnersandlearningtheory.Yetthisintroductorycourseisrarelylinkedtosustainedfieldexperiencesthatwouldhelpcandidatestocontextualizethematerial.Oneapproachtoreducingthegapbetweentheoryandpracticeisforteachercandidatestoreflectontheirownlearningastheybegintoexploretheoriesofdevelopmentandlearningandtheirrelationshiptoteaching(Pierce&Kalkman,2003).Byprovidingcandidateswithanopportunitytoexaminetheirownlearning,programshelpcandidatestoarticulatepriorknowledgeaboutcognitiveandmetacognitivestrategies,andmotivationalbeliefsmoregenerally,sothattheymightlaterdrawupontheseunderstandingsandbeliefswhendiscussinglearningtheoryanditsapplicationtoteaching. Reflectingonone’sbeliefsalsohelpsteachercandidatestostartforminghabitsthatwillservethemeffectivelyforlaterprofessionallearninganddevelopment(McCombs,2003).Thisisparticularlyimportantduringearlycoursework,whenthefocusforcandidatesmustbeonthepersonalchangesthatwillinfluenceandguidetheiremergentviewsofprofessionalissuesovertime.AsOosterheertandVermunt(2001)note,tochangeteacherbeliefsoneneedstofocusonthementalmodelsandhabitsassociatedwithlearning.Theintentwiththiscoursewastoinfluencecandidates’habitsaroundself-regulatedlearningthroughtheuseofadeliberateself-assessmentstrategyinvolvingtwopreviouslyvalidatedinstruments.
The MSLQ: Assessing Self as Learner TheMotivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire(MSLQ)isaninterna-tionallyrecognizedsurveyinstrumentthatmeasuresmotivationalbeliefs,cognitiveand metacognitive strategies, and self-regulated learning strategies (Duncan &McKeachie,2005).The15subscales(seeAppendixA),includinggoalorientation,value,self-efficacy,andrehearsal,elaboration,andorganizationstrategies,aswellas critical thinking, effort regulation, help-seeking, resource management, andpeerlearning,havebeenshowntohavebothinternalconsistencyandstatisticalreliability(Pintrich,Smith,Garcia&McKeachie,1991;1993). VanderStoepandPintrich(2003)designedatextaroundtheMSLQforuseincollege-levellearning-to-learncourses.Similarly,weincorporatedtheMSLQasatoolforhelpingcandidatestoidentifytheirbeliefsaboutmotivationandcognitionasrelatedtolearning.ThescalesoftheMSLQ,coupledwithexplicitdiscussioninclass,allowcandidatestoexploreaspectsoftheirlearningandrelatethesefindingstotheoryandresearch.Forexample,whendiscussingtheoriesofmotivation,weareabletomakeconnectionstothefivemotivationalconstructsontheMSLQandusecandidates’experiencestounderstandthesetheoreticalframeworks.AsDoleandSinatra(1998)argue,explicitconnectionsbetweencandidatesexperienceandtheneweducationalideasallowsforatransformationofboththinkingandbehavioraroundlearning.
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
115
The LCB: Assessing Self as Teacher TheLearner-Centered Battery(LCB)wasdesignedasasetofself-assessmenttoolsforK-20teacherstodevelopawarenessoftheirbeliefsaboutlearners,learningandteaching(McCombs&Lauer,1997;McCombs&Whisler,1997).MuchofthescholarshipontheLCBinventoryhasfocusedonitsuseasaprofessionaldevelopmenttoolwithelementary,middleandhighschoolteachers(McCombs&Lauer,1997;McCombs&Whisler,1997;Pierce&Kalkman,2003,Weinberger&McCombs,2003).ThisworkhasshowntheLCBtobeeffectiveintransforminginstructionalpractice.Thethirty-fiveitemsdesignedtoassessteacherbeliefsfromtheLCBhavedemonstratedvalidityandreliability(McCombs&Whisler,1997). TheLCBsurveycontainsthreescales:learner-centeredbeliefsaboutteachingandlearning,non-learner-centeredbeliefsaboutlearners,andnon-learner-centeredbeliefsaboutteaching(seeAppendixA).Thesescalesareparticularlyappropriateforearlyteachereducationbecausetheyarebroadenoughtopickupongeneralorienta-tionstoteaching.Whilesurveysmaynotprovidecandidateswitharich,sophisticatedunderstandingoftheirlearning,theydoallowcandidatestheopportunitytocharttheirbeliefsovertime.Ascandidatesgainclassroomexperienceandtesttheirpedagogicalidealswithstudents,wewouldexpectbeliefsaboutteachingtochange. WhiletheMSLQandtheLCBwerenotdevelopedcollaboratively,thesurveysmakecomplimentaryself-assessmentmeasures(c.f.,Duncan&McKeachie,2005;McCombs&Whisler,1997).McCombs(1997)arguesthatself-assessmentaffectsprofessionallearningbecauseteachersaremorelikelytotakepersonalresponsibil-ityfortheiractions.Insum,teachersareabletochooseaspectsoftheirbeliefsthattheywishtochallenge,ratherthanhavingtheseaspectschallengedbyothers.
Research Method Whileothershaveadvocatedtheimportanceofhelpingpre-serviceteachersseethemselvesaslearners(seeDembo,2001;Randi,2004),thisqualitativestudysetout toexamine theeffectivenessofsuchpractices in thecontextof teachereducationcoursework.Twoquestionsguidedthisresearch:(1)Whatdoteachercandidates report learning about themselves, as learners, after completing theMSLQandLCBself-assessmenttasks?(2)Howdoteachercandidates’beliefsaslearnersinformadevelopingunderstandingofthemselvesasteachers? Toaddressourquestionsandexaminetheroleofself-assessmentindevelop-inggreaterawarenessinteachercandidates’ learning,wecollectedasampleofcandidates’ assigned written work across one term of study in an introductoryeducational psychology course. In sum, twenty-three sets of student data werecollected,representingthefullcompositeofcandidatespossiblewithrespecttogender,ageandfinalcoursegrade.Eachsetconsistedoffourwrittenartifacts,althoughtwostoodoutasparticularlyrichexamplesofcandidates’thinkingaboutlearning:anearlyanalysisofcandidate’sMSLQandLCBself-assessmentscores
Shifting Attention
116
andafinalreflectionoverthecourse.Ourintentbycollectingandanalyzingtheseartifactswastounderstandhowcandidates’interpreted,experiencedanddrewupontheseself-assessmentexercisestoconstructtheirroleasprospectiveteachers. TheintroductorycourseexaminedhereisthefirstintherequiredsequenceofalargesecondarypreparationprogramintheMidwest.Thefirstauthordesignedandtaughtthecoursestudied,whereasthesecondauthoredservedinaresearch-onlyrole.Asaregionaluniversity,themajorityofstudentscomefromsurroundingcommunitiesandfitthestandarddemographicofateacherpreparationprogram:mostlymiddle-classandwhitewithclosetoequalnumbersoffemaleandmalestudentsseekingsecondaryeducationcertification.
Data Collection:Embedding Self-Assessment in Coursework
Duringthefirstweekofthecoursefromwhichthisdataisdrawn,candidatesindividuallycompletedtheMSLQandLCBmeasures.Aftercompletingthesurveys,butpriortoreturningscores,theclassreflectedonwhatitmeanttobea“student”ora“learner.”Thisdiscussionprovidedthecontextforcandidatestoconsidertheirscoresindepththefollowingweek.Itwasalsoadeliberateattempttoengageideasthatcandidatesheldaboutteachingandlearning,aswellasatoolforhelpingthemtodiscernimportantandgenerativedistinctionsbetweenthetwo. Duringthesecondweekofthecourse,candidatesreceivedtheirMSLQandLCBscorereports.Theirtaskwastousethebriefnarrativedescriptionsofeachscale,alongwiththepublishedscalemeans(McCombs&Whisler,1997;VanderStoep&Pintrich,2003)tocompareandcontrasttheirscores.Drawingonadditionalprintsources,theywerethenaskedtowriteareflectiononwhatthescoresmeanttothem,e.g.,Didtheyagreewiththeassessment?Wereanyscoressurprising?Wasthereanythingtheywouldliketochange? This initial reflectionprovidedcandidateswithanearlyopportunity toex-plorecourseconceptsaboutmotivation,cognitiveandmetacognitivestrategies,andteacherbeliefs.Sincecandidateshadnotyetbeenintroducedto termslike“learner-centered”or“non-learnercentered,”thisexercisealertedcandidatestothevocabularysurroundingtheseconceptsandservedasapromptforlaterdiscussionoftheseteachingorientations.Inthefinalwrittentaskoftheterm,candidateswereaskedtoprovidespecificevidenceoftheirprofessionalgrowthacrosstheterm.Ideasmentionedinthisopen-endedreflectionwereunderstoodtobesalienttothecandidateacrossthecourse.
Data Analysis: An Iterative Process of Uncovering Patterns and Relationships
Dataanalysisforthisstudyfollowedaniterativeprocesscommontoqualita-tiveinquiry.Ourfirst taskwastoreadthedata,makegeneralobservationsandidentifypatternsandthemeswithinandacrosscases(Hammersley&Atkinson,
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
117
2004).Wepaidparticularattentiontothecourseideasandconceptsthatsurfacedmostfrequentlyinstudents’writing,e.g.self-regulatedlearning;goalorientationtheory.Usingourresearchquestionsasaguide,wethencodedthedataforspecificreferencestoself-as-learner,self-as-teacher,andstudents-as-learners.Toensureconsistencyincoding,weconferredeveryfivecases(Miles&Huberman,l994). Ourinitialanalysisusingthesethreedescriptorswasusefulinhelpingtonarrowouranalyticallens.Theinitialself-assessmenttaskaskedcandidatestoreflectonandexplaintheirMSLQandLCBscores,andalsotoidentifypersonalgoalsrelativetothosescores.Thisessayrevealedanalmostexclusivefocusonself-as-learner,withmuchlessattentionpaidtoself-as-teacherandespeciallystudents-as-learners.Additionally,therewaslittleself-critiqueandgoal-setting.Incontrast,finalcoursereflectionsdemonstrateddeeper andmore expansive thinking, e.g., candidates’reported increasedattention to their developing identities as teachers and theirobligation to studentsas learners.Still, thesedocumentscontinued to showanemphasisonthereportingofstrengthsoverareasofweakness,andcandidateswerenotuniformlyexplicitabouthowthosestrengthswouldservethemasteachers. Asweconsideredtheseglobalobservationsandthoughtaboutstudents’relative“newness”intheteacherpreparationprogram,webecameparticularlyinterestedinafinergrainedcomparisonofcandidates’initialMSLQandLCBselfassessmentandtheirfinalcoursereflections.Towhatextentcouldwefindevidenceofshiftsinthinkingoractionforindividualcandidatesandcouldweseediscernablepatternsacrossstudents,e.g.weakclaimsbecomingstrongerovertime?Wefurthercodedtheself-assessmentdataforshiftsinthinkingand/orindicationsoffuturegrowthinunderstandingsofself-as-learner,self-as-teacher,orstudents-as-learners.Weassumed that unqualified score explanations in the self-assessmentwouldbe apoorpredictorofchangedbehavior,whereassummarystatementsthatsuggestedareasforfuturegrowthwouldbeamarkerofpossiblechange.Wethenlookedforevidenceoftheseshiftsinthefinalreflection. Additionally,wecodedstatementsasdirectorindirect,andstrongorweakusingachainofconceptstypology(LeCompte,Preissle,&Tesch,l993).Directclaimswerecharacterizedbyfirstpersonstatementsandstrongclaimswerechar-acterizedbyclearandconcreteillustrations.Thus,foreachbeliefstatement,wenotedwhetherthestatementswerewritteninactiveorpassivevoice.Wealsonotedwhetherthestatementrepresentedclearintent(e.g.,WhenIamateacher,IwilluseXinmyteaching)orwhetherthestatementrepresentedatentative,conditional,orrhetoricalclaim(e.g.,IshoulduseXwhenIamateacher). Finally,wecomparedandcontrastedpatternswithinourcodetypology(e.g.teacher-strong-directversusteacher-weak-indirect)toidentifythreecategoriesofshiftinthinking,fromsignificantandmoderatetonoshift.Inthiscase,wewereinterestedinwhatwemightlearnaboutthosewhoseemedtomakedemonstrableleapsintheirthinkingandthosewhodidnot.Weretherecommoncharacteristicsamongthesestudentsthatwouldhelpusteachthembetter?Inthisround,wecoded
Shifting Attention
118
dataindependently,agreeingonthesignificant/moderate/noshiftcategorizationin16ofthe23casesinoursample.Foreachofthesevenremainingcases,wediscussedandagreeduponthecategoriesbeforemovingon.Inaddition,wejointlyexaminedthelowtonoshiftcasesforidentifiablepatterns,findingthreethemesinthecaseswherewesawlittlemovement,whichwediscussbelow.
Findings
Learning about Learning, Self, and Students Ourfirstresearchquestionaskedwhatsecondarycandidatesdiscoveredaboutthemselves as learners after completing theMSLQandLCB self-assessments.Almostwithoutexception,candidate’sinitialself-reflectionswerefocusedonselfwithfewreferencestoteachingandstudents.Thiswasexpected,consideringthattheprimaryintentionoftheassignmentwastheassessmentoflearning.Further,thisassignmentwasplacedearlyinthecoursewhenstudents’ideasaboutteachingwerestillnascent.Nearlyalllearnercodesweredirectandstrong,ashighlightedinthefollowingdataexcerpts.
ResourcemanagementmaybeanareawhereIneedtogivemoreeffort.Iamnotthetypetocallothersfromclassoraskforhelp.(Jason)
Mymainproblemasacriticalthinkerismyunwillingnesstohearnewideasthatcountermyowndeeplyheldbeliefs.(Marin)
IliketogetthingsdoneassoonasIknowaboutthem…ImakealistofwhensomethingsuchasanexamisoccurringandthenImakemyselfastudyschedule.(Lauren)
Intheseexcerpts,candidatesusedconcreteandpersonalexamplestoreflectontheirself-assessmentscores.Throughthistask,studentswereabletoidentifytheirstrengthsaslearners,butalsotheareaswheretheycouldcontinuetoimprove.Asmanyofourstudentsshared,thiswaslikelytobethefirsttimetheyhadtalkedpubliclyabouttheirlearning.Severalcandidatesalsousedthistaskasanopportunitytobeginexploringissues theywill likelyfaceas teachers,ashighlightedbelowwhereonecandidate,Lauren,beginstoquestiontheteacher’sroleinalearner-centeredclassroom.
Accordingtothesurveyresults,Iputmoreemphasisonlearner-centeredclass-rooms.ThistroublesmeslightlybecausewhileIdobelievethatactivelearningisimportant,thereneedstobeteachercontrolintheclassroom.(Lauren)
Inthisexample,weseetheclashbetweenLauren’sbeliefsandheremergingconcernsasateacher.Responseslikethisdemonstratetheaddedpotentialofself-assessmentforbringingconcernstothesurfaceandpromptingquestionsthatcanbeaddressedinclassorinprivateconversationasthesemesterunfolds.Wenowlookmorecloselyattherelationshipbetweencandidates’developinginsightsaboutteachingandself-regulatedlearningandtheirexperiencewiththeMSLQandLCBself-assessmenttools.
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
119
Connecting Self-Assessment to Teaching. In contrast with the first writtenreflection’snarrowfocusonself,candidates’finalreflectionswerenearlyequallydevotedtoissuesofself,learning,andteaching.Importantly,halfofthecandidatesspontaneouslydrewupontheideasandterminologyintroducedintheself-assess-mentswhenconsideringtheirfutureasclassroomteachers.Asillustratedbythefollowingexcerpts,severalspokedirectlyoftheself-assessmenttask,whileothersreferencedthefollow-updiscussionaboutstudentsandlearnersthattookplaceinclassaftertheself-assessmentswerecomplete.
Reflections on the self-assessment task:
ThereflectionIlearnedthemostfromwasmyself-assessmentreflection…ThisassessmentallowedmetoseetheareasthatIneedtoworkontobecomeamoresuccessfulpersonandteacher.(Candace)
Theself-assessmenttoldmewhatkindoflearnerIwas.IfoundthatIamintrinsi-callymotivated…ThathelpedmewithwhyIwanttobeateacherandactedasanaccuratedescriptorofwhoIamasalearner.(Andrew)
Reflections on the students vs. learners discussion:
WetalkedalotatthebeginningofthesemesteraboutthedistinctionbetweenastudentandalearnerandthroughthisdiscussionIhavefurtherdevelopedmyconcept of a learner… If used correctly (self-assessments), they can help meaccess students’ prior knowledge, experiences, and perceptions of their ownlearning.(Katharine)
ThefirstthingIlearnedistonotteacheachstudentasastudent,buttomakethemintoalearner.IrealizedthatIwasalearnerandIhavetoguidethechildrenthatIwillbeteachingtostartthinkingandactinglikeIdo.(Sheila)
Aswefurtherstudiedthedifferencesinsubstanceanddepthamongthefinalessays,wenotedthatwhencandidateswereabletoprovideexamplesfrompersonalexperience,ourunderstandingoftheirlearningwasenhanced.Similarly,self-assess-menthelpedstudentsmakelinkages—atfirstconcreteandthenabstract—betweencoursecontentandpersonalexperience.Self-assessmentalsopromptedconcepttransferbyencouragingstudents’ toowntheirownlearning.Weseethis inthefollowingcomment,whereJasonusedthefinalreflectiontoarticulatethevaluehesawinself-versusteacher-drivenassessments.
Someself-assessmentssuchastheMSLQorTeacherBeliefsSurveytendtohavemoreofanintrinsicrealizationaboutwhoweare,ratherthanalabelbeingputonanyone.Thiswayeachindividualcanseefactorsthatmayneedtobeaddressedandfocusonthemratherthanbeingprejudged.(Jason)
Anothercandidatenotedthattheself-assessmentsurveywasonlythebeginningoftheprocess,stating:“IlearnedalotabouthowIlearnandnotjustfromtakingthesurvey.IlearnedabouthowIlearnandcomprehendinformationbyactually
Shifting Attention
120
learningsomething”(Robert).Thiscandidatewasabletoseehowself-assessmentwasatoolfordeliberatereflection,allowinghimtomakeconnectionswithcoursecontent.
Connecting Self-Assessment to Understandings of Self-Regulated Learning.Anotherexampleofwherewesawconcepttransferwaswithregardtoself-regu-latedlearning,wherenearlyallofourteachercandidatesmentionedself-regulatedlearning,eitherexplicitlyorbyexample, in theirfinalreflections.AsCaitlin,anon-traditionalteachercandidateshared:
Self-regulatedlearningisnotaconceptIwasfamiliarwithbeforethisclass.TwentyyearsagowhenIattendedhighschool,thiswasn’tthefocusofsecondaryeducation.Iremembermyinstitutionallearningexperienceasformulaicandpredictable,asidefromonegiftedclass.…This[educationcourse]hasenlightenedmetothefactthatbeingabletobreezealongdidn’treallyhelpmelearn.Itmakesmealittlebitsad,wonderingwhatImighthaveaccomplishedintherightenvironment.Iplantochallengemystudentsandhelpthemgrowaslearners.(Caitlin)
Caitlinhaspersonalizedherunderstandingofself-regulatedlearningbyfirstconsideringherownexperienceasahighschoolstudent,andthenreflectingontheexperienceshewantsforherfuturestudents.Oneofherclassmates,amoretraditionalcandidate,echoedthissentiment,highlightingthepotentialofself-as-sessmentstolinkabstracttheorieswithpersonalexperienceascandidatesbegintoconstructanunderstandingoftheirroleasprospectiveteachers.
Iwastaughtthroughouthighschoolandcollegetothinkandperforminmundane,repetitiveways.Thiscoursehelpedmetonotonlyaccess[a]criticalwayofthink-ingatalltimes,notjustwhenneeded,buthowtoactuallyhelpmystudentslearntothinkinthiswayaswell.Self-regulatedlearningisoneofthebesttoolsthatIcouldhavelearnedinthisclass.(Sheila)
Yetathirdcandidate,Ella,spokeofthevalueshenowholdsfortheideaofself-regulatedlearning:
Myrecognitionofthevalueandimportanceofself-regulatedlearninghasbecomeacrucialpartof thisclass…Ihavebeguntoforcemyself tostayintrinsicallymotivated,reviewmyworkandresubmititafterfixingmymistakes,andeventoteachmyselfinformationthatcouldbepertinenttotheclass.(Ella)
Astheseexcerptsillustrate,theself-assessmenttaskhelpedtoprimecandidates’experiencebyalertingthemtovocabularyandconceptstheywouldencounterlaterinthecourse.Further,sinceself-evaluationisapartofself-regulatedlearning,thesecandidateswereabletopersonallyexperiencethispartoftheprocess.Inreadingstudents’final reflections, itbecameclear that theyhadbegun touse languageofferedinthecoursetointerpretandevaluatetheirownexperience,whichwassuggestiveofapreferencefor“self-regulatedlearning.”
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
121
Learning about Teaching Oursecondresearchquestionexaminedhowcandidates’beliefsaboutthemselvesaslearnersinformedtheirunderstandingofthemselvesasteachers,includinghowtheseunderstandingsmayhavechangedovertime.Inaddressingthisquestion,ourfirststepwastoplacecandidatesintothreegroups,eachrepresentingsignificant,moderateorminimalchangeinreportedbeliefs.Throughanalysisoftheirwrittenassignments,weidentifiedfourcandidates(17%)whodemonstratedasignificantshiftintheirreflectionsacrosstheterm,11candidates(48%)whodemonstratedamoderateshift,andeightcases(35%)thatfellintothelowornoshiftcategory. Amongthosewhoshowedasignificantormoderateshift,weobservedgreaterattentiontoself-as-learner,aswellasagrowingattentiontoself-as-teacherandstudents-as-learners.Intheseessayswefoundstrongerandmoredirectconnectionsbetweenpersonalexperienceandcoursecontent.Further,candidatesfrequentlyelaboratedontheirthinking,inadditiontodiscussingconcreteapplicationsofcourseconcepts.Overall,therewerestrongertendenciestolinklearningandteachingincomplexandappliedways.Thesequalitiesgrewfromtheself-assessmenttothefinalreflection,withshiftsclearlylinkedtocoursecontentandgoals. Toillustrate,teachercandidateswhosedocumentswerecodedasmoderateshowedanespeciallyclearunderstandingofself-as-learner.Theseteachercandidateshadastronggeneralconceptionoflearningandhowitrelatestobeingateacher.Forexample,inthefollowingself-assessment,Randystated:
Ineedtoworkontheextrinsicmotivation,andshiftittowardsagoalofwantingtolearnfortheknowledge.Thisgoesalongwiththeideaofbeingaself-regulatedlearneraswellasbeingatask-focusedstudent.ThescoresareagoodinsighttowhatIhavetoworkontoimprovemyselfasalearner.(Randy)
Later,inhisfinalreflection,Randywrote:
Andthemostimportantaspectofbecomingateacheristhefactthatteachersarealwayslearning,thereforeeffectiveteachersfindandtrynewmethodstotryandrelayinformationtostudents…Onlybyself-reflection/evaluationwillateacherbeabletogetbetterandgrowasateacherandalearner.(Randy)
Intheexcerptabove,weseeacandidatewhograspstheneedfortheteachertobealearner.Still,thesecommentsdonotprovidespecificrecommendationsforactualteachingpractices.Similarly,anothercandidatedescribedherself-assessmentinthefollowingways:
Mylearner-centeredbeliefs[scores]arehigherthanthemean,becauseIdobe-lievethefocusoftheclassroomandlearningiscenteredaroundthelearner,notsolelyontheteacher…Ibelievetheclassroomshouldbecenteredonmoreactiveparticipationandengagement,ratherthantheteachercontrollingeverythingthathappensintheclassroom.(Susan)
Later,inherfinalreflection,Susanwasabletoarticulatethispointmoreclearly:
Shifting Attention
122
OneofmystrengthsisthatIamabletomakeconnectionstomanythingsandsee thatmanyconceptsfit together.…I read theRidley,McCombs,&Taylorarticleandimmediatelymadeconnectionstothisclass,andalsoothersthatarenotself-regulatedlearning…[inanothercourse]Ihavehadtheopportunitytoteachwithgroupmembersthissemester…IwritereflectionseverytimeIteach,soIamabletoreflectonmyprogress…Ihavecometounderstandwhatgoesintoteaching,howtomakelessonsinterestingwhilestillconveyingapoint,andwhatIgetoutofit.(Susan)
Thiscandidatehasageneralsenseofwhosheisintheself-assessmentthatisexpressedmoreexplicitlyinthefinalreflection.However,shedoesnotpresentspecificapplicationsofhowshewouldapproachcreatingaself-regulatedlearningenvironment.Asteachereducators,ithasbeenhelpfultonoticethistendencyinstudentresponses.Asthefirstrequiredcourseoftheteacherpreparationprogram,wewouldnotexpectcandidatestohaveafully-developedsenseoftheiridentityasfutureteachers,butwedowanttoseetheircommitmenttodevelopingasteacherswhoarecapableofattendingtostudents’learning.Furtherinsightscanbetakenfromthosewhowerecodedinthesignificantandnoshiftcategories.
Making a Commitment to Student Learning.Notably,the17%ofcandidateswhosedocumentswerecodedasdemonstratingasignificantshiftwereabletogobeyondaglobalunderstandingofthemselvesaslearnerstoshowsignsoflearner-as-teacher.Intheseessays,candidatesnotonlydrewupontheconcretenessoftheirownexperience,butwereequallyarticulateabouttheclassroomtheyhopedtoonedaylead,andwhatitmighttaketogetthere.Theseessaysrichlyincorporatedtheconceptsandvocabularyofthecourse.Further,thesecandidatessawtheintentionbehindthewaythecoursewasstructuredanddelivered.Oneteachercandidaterevisedherself-assessmenttowardtheendofthesemester,noting:
Ifeelthatitisimportantforanyteachertohaveaclassroomthatislearner-cen-tered.…[R]elatedtothisarenon-learner[centered]beliefsintermsofteaching.Myscoreonthisreferstohavingstudentcontrolinaclassroomversusteachercontrol.[Professor]isagreatexampleofthis.Sheallowsstudentstocontrolwherethelearninggoesandistheretoguideusandclarifycertainconcepts.ThiswouldbemygoalforhowIwantmyclassroomtobe.(Holly)
Inherfinalreflection,thiscandidategoesontodescribehowherexperienceasalearnerinthecoursehashelpedherimaginethekindofteachingsheaspirestoasafuturesecondaryteacher.
ThemostimportantthingIfeelthatIamtakingawayfromthisclassishowtomakestudentsbecomelearners…Asalearnermyself,Ihavelearnedtomakeimprovementsinmyownworkandshow[myown]progress.Whenputtingmyworkcollectiontogether,Istartedtoseethemethodtowhy[theprofessor]hasbeengivingme‘Rewrites’onmostofmywork.[She]knowsthatifwearemotivatedtosucceedthenwewillkeeprevisingpaperstokeepimproving.(Holly)
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
123
Hollyrepeatsthisideainherconclusion.
IfIcantaketheinformationthathasbeenpresentedtomeinmyeducationclassesandapplyittomyclassroom,thenIthinkthatIcanbeasuccessfulteacher.Ithinkthatmygoalwillbetomakeanimpactonmystudentandhelpthemseethemselvesaslearnersandshowthemthat theyaretheonesthatcontrol theirownlearning.(Holly)
The Importance of Candidate Professional Growth and Learning.Asecondexampleofsignificantshiftappearsinthenextexample,asJasondescribeshisunderstandingofcritical thinking.Thisexcerpt indicateshowhe isworking toapplycoursecontentonapersonallevel,usingtheterm“transformed”tocapturethesignificanceofthisforhislearning.
Thechallengewastonolongerlookatthingsandtakethemforwhattheyare,rathertolookatsomethinganddissectwhythecertaineventhappened.Thisiswheremyfocusfromstudenttolearnertransformed.…IguessIhavechangedmyapproachandstartedtothinkhowcanImanipulatethisinformationandinwhatways.(Jason)
Weseethiscandidate’sinterestinlinkingcoursecontenttopracticalexperiencemoreclearlyinthefollowingexample,takenfromlaterinthesamepaper.
IrecentlyhadanexperienceinclasswheremyCalculusteachergaveusthechancetoteachforaday.IdoveheadfirstintotheopportunityknowingthatImaybewrong,buthowdoIcontinuetolearnandprosperifIamneverwrong?Thisiswhenitallhitmethatmakingmistakescanbebeneficialtoteachingandlearningalike.Oncewemakeamistakeandthinkcriticallyaboutthatmistakethereisagreaterchancethatwewillnotproceedthesamewaythenexttimeweapproachthesamesituation.(Jason)
Astheseillustrationsshow,asmallbutsignificantpercentageofcandidatesareabletousetheself-assessmenttasktoreflectontheirownlearningprocesses,andtodrawupontheseunderstandingsastheyenvisioninsurprisinglyconcreteandpracticaltermstheirfutureclassrooms.
The Developmental Nature of Candidate Thinking.Finally,weobservedthatcandidateswhoreportedlittletonoshiftfellintooneofthreecategories:(1)candi-dateswhoappearedtohaveforeclosedontheirideaspriortothestartofthecourse,(2)candidateswhowerejustbeginningtograsptheideaofself-as-learner,and(3)candidateswhoseself-assessmentsweremoreindepththantheirfinalreflection,perhapsasaconsequenceofend-of-semestertimingandweariness. Wereturntoacandidateweintroducedearlierinthepaper;astudentwhosebeliefsremainedsteadythroughoutthecourse.Indiscussingherself-assessmentresults,thiscandidateremarkedabouthowshewastroubledbyherLCBscore.Laurenwrote:“Iputmoreemphasisonalearner-centeredclassroom.Thistroubles
Shifting Attention
124
meslightlybecausewhileIdobelievethatactivelearningisimportant,thereneedstobeteachercontrolintheclassroom.”Sheconcludesherthoughtsbyindicatinganinterestinseeinghowherbeliefsmightchangeovertime:
Atthemoment,thereisnotmuchthatIwouldliketochangeaboutmythinkingonlearningstrategiesandlearningingeneral.However,Iwillstayopen-mindedabouttheseideas…Iaminterestedinfindingouthowmuchmyopinionschangeinonesemester.(Lauren)
Inherfinalreflection,Laurenreturnstothesecomments:
Lookingatmyself-reflectionpaper,whilediscussinghowmytestscoresindicatedthatIputanemphasisonlearner-centeredclassroom,Idiscussedthatthiswasnottheonlywaythatstudentsmayfindbeneficialtolearn.Someneedlessfreedomandmoreguidancefromtheteacher.Whilethisonlygivestwoexamplesofhowpeoplelearn,Idorealizethattherearemanyotherwaysoutthere.(Lauren)
Thisparticularcandidatehadanegativeexperiencewithreformmathematicsinhighschoolandwasfrustratedbywhatsheperceivedasalackofteachersup-port.Thus,whileLaurenwaswillingtoacknowledgeotherapproachestoteach-ing,herwritingshowedastrongpreferencefortheonethatfitherownlearningprocesses.Thisparticularexampleremindsusofjusthowpowerfulstudents’priorexperiencesareinshapingtheirbeliefs.Here,theself-assessmenttaskhelpedustoidentifyLauren’sbeliefssothatwecouldbetteraddresstheirrelationshiptoherunderstandingsofself-as-teacherandstudents-as-learners. Forcandidateswhowerejustbeginningtounderstandwhatitmeanstobealearner,wedidnotobservestrongattemptstoexpanduponthisideainthefinalreflection.Rather,thesecandidatesseemedtoknowwhatwasneededinordertobecomealearner,buthadnotyetinternalizedtheprocess.Onecandidatestateditasfollows:
Thisassessmenthelpedmetolearnafewkeythingsaboutmyself.First,thatIneedtostopbeinglazyanddothework.Next,thatIneedtofindthemotivationtokeepschoolapriority.Andfinally,thatIbelieveallstudents,includingme,havethepotentialtolearn.(Rebecca)
Rebecca’ssuperficialresponsesuggeststousthatcourse-relatedopportunitiestointernalizeandpersonalizetheseconceptsweremissed.Shegoesontosayinherfinalreflection:
Iamdrawnto[teaching]becauseofmyownnature.…Iplanonbeingalife-longlearnerandoneofmyfuturegoalsistoinstillthatsamecuriosityandthirstforknowledgethatIpossess.(Rebecca)
Thiscandidate’sself-assessmentdemonstratesa“student”approach.Whileshemakesasemanticcaseformovingtowardbecomingalearner,sheisnotabletoprovidespecificevidenceofthismovement.Thus,itmaystillbeafuturegoalforthiscandidate,orinaworst-casescenario,notinherfutureatall.
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
125
Thethirdgroupofteachercandidateswhosedocumentsdonotmanifestashiftincludethoseindividualswhoweremorespecificandclearintheirself-assessmentreflectionsthantheywereinthefinalreflections.Onecandidatedescribedhisself-assessmentreflectionthisway,
Asa learner, I’vediscoveredmanyassumptions Ihadaboutmyown learningprocesswereeithermistakenorinneedofrevision.Forinstance,thereislittlemethodandtechniquetomystudying.Recognizingthatgoodorganizationandacoherentmethodwouldstrengthenmycognitivestrengthsandwouldreducemyinefficientlearningpatternsisanimportantstep.(Joshua)
Attheendoftheterm,thissamestudentwrites:
Iwillconstructtime/studymethodsthatwillallowmetosystematicallyexploreassignmentsandprojectstomyownintellectualsatisfaction,andnotonlytotheexpectationsofaninstructorormentor.(Joshua)
Astheexcerptabovehighlights,asmallgroupofstudentsseemtoregressintheirresponses,latchingontoclichéphrasesinordertosatisfyinstructorexpectationsataminimumlevelofengagement. It is reasonable toassumethatacandidatemightrunoutoftimetocompletetheassignment,orloseinterestinthecourseandmerely“student”throughthefinaltaskofthesemester.Itisalsopossiblethatstudentsmaybeself-selectingoutoftheprogram.
Discussion and Implications
Focusing Attention on Student Learning Asthisstudyreveals,deliberateself-assessmentinterventionscanbeanef-fectivemethodforhelpingsecondarycandidatesarticulateandinterrogatetheirnotionsaboutlearningstrategies,whichinturncanhelpthemtoconnectwithandapplyabstractconceptsfromtheliteratureonlearningtheorytofutureinstruc-tionalpractices.Asthedataillustrate,manyofourcandidateswereabletousetheirself-assessmentresultsasadvanceorganizersoverthecourseofthesemester,interpretingconceptslikecriticalthinkingandself-regulatedlearningthroughthelensoftheirownprocessesandexperiencesaslearners.Theywerefurtherabletoexaminetheoriesofcognitionandmotivationfromapersonalposition,givingtheseideasnewrelevance.Bythefinalreflections,manycandidates’referencestolearningreflectedamoresophisticatedunderstandingofthelearningprocess. Moreover, through the self-assessmentprocesswebegin to see candidatesapproachtheirroleasmodellearners.Whenaskedtoexploretheirdevelopmentthroughoutthecourse,manywereabletousetheexplicitlanguageofself-regulatedlearninginwaysandcontextsthatseemedtoindicateapreferenceforthisidea.Somementiontakingmoreresponsibilityfortheirownlearning,whileothersmen-tionshiftsintheirmotivation,fromextrinsictointrinsic.Stillothersmentiontheideathattheyneededtolearntostudydifferentlyfromthewaytheyhadpreviously.
Shifting Attention
126
Thesecandidateshavebeguntoshifttowardameaning-directedlearningpattern(Vermunt&Vermetten,2004),wheretheyareattemptingtomakesenseoftheirownlearningprocesses.Importantly,thesesamecandidatesincreasinglytalkedabouthowtheywishedthesamefortheirfuturestudents.Thus,weseeinthedatahowasignificantnumberofcandidatesarebeginningtoconnectanunderstandingoftheirownlearningtotheirdevelopingideasaboutclassroomteachingpractices. Thesedatafurthersuggestthatcandidatesareusingtheiridentityaslearnerstoformulateanemergingidentityasteachers.Aslife-longstudents,theybringexten-siveclassroomexperience,resultinginarangeofbeliefsandpredispositionsthatareimplicit,powerfulandenduring(Knowles&Holt-Reynolds,1991;Pajares,1992).Assuch,thesebeliefsandpredispositionsarelikelytoinfluencepracticeifleftunex-amined(Beijaard,Verloop,&Vermunt,1999;Feiman-Nemser,2001).Forexample,withoutanintentionalanalysisof“theothersideofthedesk,”teachercandidates’immediatefocusduringpreparationisprimarilyonauthority-basedteacherattributessuchasmanagementskillsandknowledgeofcontent,notstudents’learning(Ethel&McMeniman,2002;Gould,2000;Knowles&Holt-Reynolds,1991). Topromptashiftinperspective,webelieveitisimportanttomaketeachercandidates’beliefsexplicitinordertofacilitatethekindofcriticalthinkingneededto develop a more theoretically-grounded approach to teaching and learning,especiallyonethatfocusesmorecentrallyonstudentsaslearners(Dembo,2001;Knowles&Holt-Reynolds,1991).Ourfindingssupport thisclaim.Developinggreaterawarenessofone’sselfasalearnerservestoinformthedevelopmentofone’sidentityasateacherwhopaysattentiontostudentsaslearners.
Self-Assessment as a Pedagogical Tool Thesedatademonstrate that interventions that employdeliberate learning-focusedself-assessmentcanbeausefulexerciseforhelpingcandidatestounpacktheirassumptionsandbeliefsabouttheprofessionandaboutthemselvesaslearn-ers.Althoughpreviousresearchhasdemonstratedtheutilityofautobiographicalreflectioninunderstandingone’sidentityasateacher(Carter&Doyle,1996;Holt-Reynolds,2000),teachersaretypicallynotaskedtolookbackatthemselvesas“modellearners”inordertounderstandlearningandteaching.Teachercandidatesneedtoseebothwheretheyhavebeenandwheretheycurrentlyareaslearnersastheydevelopavisionforwhotheywouldliketobecomeasteachers. Thisisparticularlytruewhenassessmentisdesignedforlearning(seeStiggins,2005).Ourstudentsusedself-assessmenttounderstandtheirownlearningaswellaslearningtheoriesmoregenerally.Forthistohappen,however,candidateshadtofeelsafewhenexploringtheirattitudesandbeliefs.Asteachereducators,itisimportantthattheseassessmentsbeplacedinalow-stakescontext.Itisalsoimportanttorememberthatanyassessmentoflearningshouldavoiddeferencetoparticularpoliticalbeliefs,sociologicalideologies,orpersonalitycharacteristicsthatmaybeperipherallyrelatedtopedagogicalpractice(Damon,2005).Formalanddeliberateself-assessmentslike
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
127
theMSLQandtheLCBmayhavehighvalueforteachereducatorspreciselybecausetheyarenotassessingcandidates’ideologies. Additionally,becausetheseself-assessmentsareembeddedwithinacourse,teachercandidatesmayfeelmoreinclinedtoviewtheresultsasideastoconsiderratherthanasparticularideologies.Whenapproachedthisway,self-assessmentsliketheMSLQandLCBcanbeusedtofurtherexplorecandidate’scommitmenttolearningandteaching,aswellasprovideteachereducatorswiththerareopportunitytoidentifyandassessteachercandidates’preconceivednotionsaboutlearningandteaching.Deliberateself-assessmentmaymakeiteasierforinstructorstoobserveandrespondtotheneedsofthecandidateandtohelpthecandidateinterrogatehisorherbeliefsinaconstructive,growth-producingmanner. Inorderforself-assessmentstohaveanimpactonteachercandidates,however,theyneedtobeemployedconsistentlyandresponsively(Weinberger&McCombs,2003).Forexample,itiscriticalthatfacultyusingself-assessmenttools,liketheMSLQandLCB,haveasolidunderstandingofhowtoadministerandinterpretthesetoolsforconceptualself-assessment,asopposedtopracticalorevaluativeself-assessment(Boud&Falchikov,1989).Thestudyfindingsreportedheredidnothappenaccidentally,butresultedfromadeliberateandsustainedinterventionbyaskilledteachereducator.Itmayalsobeimportanttoexplorestrategiesforbuildinguponandextendingtheemphasisofthesetoolsprogrammatically.Candidatesinoursecondaryeducationprogramarecontinuallyaskedtoframetheirreflectionsaroundlearning:firsttheirown,thentheirstudents.Reflectiveself-assessmentiswellsuitedforcouplingwithprogrammaticapproachesthatpromptfurtherreflec-tiononstudents’learning.
Study Limitations Atthesametime,itisimportanttoacknowledgethelimitationsofthesetypesofself-assessments.Whenstudentscompleteself-reporttasksinthecontextofacourse,particularlywhenthosesametasksareassessedandgraded,wecanpre-dictstudents’tendencytowardreportingsociallydesirableresults.Withoutfullyunderstandingthepurposeofthesurveys,candidatesmayprovideanswerstheyfeeltheinstructorwantstohear,ortheymaynototherwisebefullyhonestforfearoflosingpointsonanassignment. Therearealso limitationsrelated to thesampleofparticipants.Likemanyteacher educationprograms across the country, our candidates are fromapre-dominantlyWhite,middle-classdemographic,andpresumably, fromsocio-cul-turalcontextswhereWhite,middle-classvaluesaresupported.Thepresentstudyexaminesindividualexperienceswithconceptualself-assessmentinthecontextofclassdiscussionaroundfosteringself-regulatedlearning.Theseconstructsandprocessesarecontextualizedwithinthevarioussocialandorganizationalstructuresofschooling.Forexample,discussionsmayuseconceptsintheself-assessmenttoexploreconceptslikegenderdifferencesinmotivation(Wigfield&Eccles,2002)
Shifting Attention
128
orstereotypethreat(Steele,1997).Finally,wecannotpresumethatthepatternsidentifiedinthisgroupofcandidateswillholdsteadyacrossgender,race,classandgeographicdifferences.Norcanweassumethatallgroups(betheycandidates,orthestudentsofthosecandidates)willfindtheunderstandingsaboutlearningadvocatedheretobeculturallycomfortableorrelevant.Sincepreviousresearchonself-assessmenthasnotaddresseddiversepopulations,weencourageotherstosimilarlyimplement,studyandreporttheuseofself-assessmentsinarangeofdiverseteachereducationcontexts.
Preparing Learning-Focused Teachers Itisworthwhile,thenforteacherpreparationprogramstoconsidertheadoptionoflearner-centeredprinciples(APA,1993)throughoutcoursework.Whiletheseprinciplesappear tobepartofwhatmanyofusconsiderbestpractice, teachercandidatesoftenexperienceopaqueexposuretotheseprinciples.Evenwhenweembed learner-centered principles in our own practice as teacher educators, itmaybedifficultforourcandidatestoapplytheseprinciplesintheirinstructionalpractice.Tothisend,self-assessmenttoolscanhelpcandidates“see”thethinkingbehindouractions,aswellastheactionsoftheirstudents.Atthesametime,itisimportantthatwecontinuetotesttheeffectivenessofself-assessmentinshiftingbeliefsandattitudesforadiverserangeofcandidatesenteringevenmorediverseschoolsettings. Thecarefulandskillfuluseofself-assessmentinterventionsaroundlearningcanhelpcandidatesbegintodeveloptheself-regulatorycapacitiestheyneedtobemoreskilledaslearners,thusmoreeffectiveasteachers(Dembo,2001).Teachereducationprogramscanfurtherhelptomakethelearningprocesstransparentbyincorporatingexplicitinstructionincognitivestrategies,metacognitivestrategies,andelementsofself-regulatedlearning.Whencandidatesdevelopthevocabularyandsyntaxaroundlearningandteaching,theycanbegintointernalizetheseideastotheirbeliefsaboutteaching.Asoneofourcandidatesnoted,“InowfeellikeIholdmyownlearninginmyhands.”
Note 1Studentingandlearningareoftencuedbyclassroompracticesandprocedures.Forexample,whenstudentsexperienceteacher-centeredinstructionalpracticesthatfailtoen-gagethemaslearners(e.g.,lecturesandrecitations),wecanpredictstudentingbehaviorsdrivenbyasetofmotivationalbeliefsandlearningstrategiesthatareadoptedtomeettheminimaldemandsofthesepractices(e.g.,surfacestrategiesorcheatingbehaviors).Sincethe instruction thatmanyhigh school andmost early college students experience tendstowardteacher-centered,itisunderstandablewhencandidatesengageinstudentingratherthanlearningbehaviorswhentheyentertheteacherpreparationprogram.
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
129
ReferencesAirsian,P.W.,&Gullickson,A.(1994).Examinationofteacherself-assessment.Educational
Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 8(2),195-203.APATaskForceonPsychologyandEducation.(1993).The learner-centered psychological
principles: Guidelines for school redesign and reform.Washington,DC:AmericanPsychologicalAssociationandtheMid-ContinentRegionalEducationalLaboratory.
Beijaard,D.,Verloop,N.,&Vermunt,J.D.(1999).Teachers’perceptionsofaprofessionalidentity:Anexploratorystudyfromapersonalknowledgeperspective.Teaching and Teacher Education, 16,749-764.
Boud,D.,&Falchikov,N.(l989).Quantitativestudiesofstudentself-assessmentinhighereducation:Acriticalanalysisoffindings.Higher Education, 18,529-549.
Carter,K.,&Doyle,W.(1996).Personalnarrativeandlifehistoryinlearningtoteach.InJ.Sikula,T.J.ButteryandE.Guyton(Eds.),Handbook of research on teacher education,2nded.(pp.123-142).NewYork:Macmillan.
Cleary,T.,&Zimmerman,B.J.(2002).Becomingaself-regulatedlearner:Anoverview.Theory into Practice, 41(2),64-70.
Damon,W.(2005).Personality test: The dispositional dispute in teacher preparation today, and what to do about it.WashingtonDC:TheThomasB.FordhamInstitute.
Dembo,M.H.(2001).Learningtoteachisnotenough—futureteachersalsoneedtolearnhowtolearn.Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(4),23-35.
Dole,J.A.,&Sinatra,G.M.(1998).Reconceptualizingchangeinthecognitiveconstructionofknowledge.Educational Psychologist, 26(4),109-128.
Duncan,T.G.,&McKeachie,W.L.(2005).ThemakingoftheMotivatedStrategiesforLearningQuestionnaire.Educational Psychologist, 40(2),117-128.
Elliot,J.(1978).Classroomaccountabilityandtheself-monitoringteacher.InW.Harlen(Ed.),Evaluation and the teacher’s role(pp.47-90).London,UK:MacmillanEducation.
Ethell,R.,&McMeniman,M.(2002).Acriticalfirststepinlearningtoteach:Confrontingthepowerandtenacityofstudentteachers’beliefsandpreconceptions.InC.Sugrue&C.Day(Eds.),Developing teachers and teaching practice: International research perspectives(pp.216-223).NewYork:Routledge/FalmerPress.
Feiman-Nemser,S.(2001).Frompreparationtopractice:Designingacontinuumtostrengthenandsustainteaching.Teachers College Record, 103,1013-1055.
Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2),207-226.
Gordon,S.C.,Dembo,M.H.,&Hocevar,D.(2007).Doteacher’sownlearningbehaviorsinfluencetheirclassroomgoalorientationandcontrolideology?Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(1),36-46.
Gould,L.(2000).Changesinpreserviceteachers’schemaforunderstandingteaching.Action in Teacher Education, 21(4),90-100.
Hammersley,M.&Atkinson,P.(2004).Ethnography: Principles in practice.London,UK:Routledge.
Holt-Reynolds,D.(2000).Whatdoes the teacherdo?Constructivistpedagogiesandtheprospectiveteachers’beliefsabouttheroleofateacher.Teaching and Teacher Educa-tion, 16,21-32.
Kagan,D.M.(1992).Professionalgrowthamongpreserviceandbeginningteachers.Review of Educational Research, 62(2),129-169.
Shifting Attention
130
Knowles,J.G.,&Holt-Reynolds,D.(1991).Shapingpedagogiesthroughpersonalhistoriesinpreserviceteachereducation.Teachers College Record, 93(1),87-113.
LeCompte,M.D.,Preissle,J.,&Tesch,R.(1993).Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research(2nded.).SanDiego,CA:AcademicPress.
Lortie,D.C.(l975).Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.
McCombs,B.L.(2003).AframeworkfortheredesignofK-12educationinthecontextofcurrenteducationalreform.Theory into Practice, 42(2),93-101.
McCombs,B.L.(1997).Self-assessmentandreflection:Toolsforpromotingteacherchangestowardlearner-centeredpractices.NASSP Bulletin, 81,1-14.
McCombs,B.L.,&Lauer,P.A.(1997).Developmentandvalidationofthelearner-centeredbattery:Self-assessmenttoolsforteacherreflectionandprofessionaldevelopment.The Professional Educator, 20(1),1-21.
McCombs,B.,&Whisler,S.J.(1997).The learner-centered classroom and school: Strategies for enhancing student motivation and achievement.SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.
McLaughlin,M.W.(2002).Sitesandsourcesofteachers’learning.InC.Sugrue&C.Day(Eds.),Developing teachers and teaching practice: International research perspectives(pp.95-115).NewYork:Routledge/FalmerPress.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman,A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis,2nded.ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.
Oosterheert,I.E.,&Vermunt,J.D.(2001).Individualdifferencesinlearningtoteach:Relat-ingcognition,regulation,andaffect.Learning and Instruction, 11(2),133-156.
Pajares, M. F. (1992).Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messyconstruct.Review of Educational Research, 62,307-322.
Pierce,J.W.,&Kalkman,D.L. (2003).Applying learner-centeredprinciples in teachereducation.Theory Into Practice, 42(2),127-132.
Pintrich,P.R,Smith,D.A.F.,Garcia,T.,&McKeachie,W.J.(1991).A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).AnnArbor,MI:University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve PostsecondaryTeachingandlearning.
Pintrich,P.R,Smith,D.A.F.,Garcia,T.,&McKeachie,W.J.(1993).ReliabilityandpredictivevalidityoftheMotivatedStrategiesforLearningQuestionnaire(MSLQ).Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53,801-813.
Randi, J. (2004).Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record, 106(9),1825-1853.
Rogers,C.(1983).Freedom to learn for the 80s.Columbus,OH:CharlesE.Merrill.Ross,J.A.,&Bruce,C.D.(2007).Teacherself-assessment:Amechanismforprofessional
growth.Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2),146-159.Schön,D.A.(1983).The reflective practitioner.NewYork:BasicBooks.Schön,D.A.(1987).Educating the reflective practitioner.SanFrancisco:Jossey-Bass.Sluijsmans,D.,Dochy,F.,&Moerkerke,G.(1999).Creatingalearningenvironmentbyusing
self-,peer-andco-assessment.Learning Environments Research, 1,293-319.Steele,C.M.(1997).Athreatintheair:Howstereotypesshapeintellectualidentityand
performance.The American Psychologist, 52(6),613-629.Stiggins,R.J.(2005).Student-involved assessment for learning,4thed.UpperSaddleRiver,
NJ:PearsonPrenticeHall.VanderStoep,S.W.&Pintrich,P.R.(2003).Learning to learn: The skill and will of college
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
131
success.UpperSaddleRiver,NJ:PrenticeHall.Vermunt,J.D.,&Vermetten,Y.J.(2004).Patternsinstudentlearning:Relationshipsbetween
learning strategies, conceptionsof learning, and learningorientations.Educational Psychology Review, 16(4),359-384
Weinberger,E.,&McCombs,B.L.(2003).ApplyingtheLearner-CenteredPrinciplestohighschooleducation.Theory Into Practice, 42(2),117-126.
Wigfield,A.,&Eccles,J.S.(2002).Thedevelopmentofcompetencebeliefs,expectanciesforsuccess,andachievementvaluesfromchildhoodthroughadolescence.InA.Wig-field&J.S.Eccles(Eds.),Development of achievement motivation(pp.91-120).SanDiego,CA:AcademicPress.
Zimmerman,B. J. (2002).Becomingaself-regulated learner:Anoverview.Theory into Practice, 41(2),64-70.
Zimmerman,B.J.,Bonner,S.,&Kovach,R.(1996).Developing self-regulated learners.Washington,DC:AmericanPsychologicalAssociation.
Appendix ASample Items for Scales from the MSLQ and the LCB
MSLQ Motivation Scales
Intrinsic Goal Orientation “Inaclasslikethis,IprefercoursematerialthatreallychallengesmesothatIcanlearnnewthings.” “Themostsatisfyingthingformeinthiscourseistryingtounderstandthecontentasthoroughlyaspossible.”
Extrinsic Goal Orientation “Gettingagoodgradeinthisclassisthemostsatisfyingthingformerightnow.” “IfIcan,Iwanttogetbettergradesinthisclassthanmostoftheotherstudents.”
Control of Learning “ItismyownfaultifIdon’tlearnthematerialinthiscourse.” “IfIdon’tunderstandthecoursematerial,itisbecauseIdon’ttryhardenough.”
Task Value “IthinkIwillbeabletousewhatIlearninthiscourseinothercourses.” “Understandingthesubjectmatterofthiscourseisveryimportanttome.”
Self-efficacy “I’mcertainthatIcanunderstandthemostdifficultmaterialpresentedinthereadingsforthiscourse.” “Consideringthedifficultyofthiscourse,theteacher,andmyskills,IthinkIwilldowellinthisclass.”
Cognitive and Metacognitive Scales
Rehearsal Strategies “Whenstudyingforthiscourse,Ireadmyclassnotesandthecoursereadingsoverandoveragain.”
Shifting Attention
132
“Imakelistsofimportantitemsforcourseslikethisandmemorizethelists.”
Elaboration Strategies “Itrytorelateideasinthissubjecttothoseinothercourseswhereverpossible.” “Itrytoapplyideasfromcoursereadingsinotherclassactivitiessuchaslectureanddiscussion.”
Organization Strategies “Imakesimplecharts,diagrams,ortablestohelpmeorganizecoursematerial.” “When I study the readings inacourse like this, Ioutline thematerial tohelpmeorganizemythoughts.”
Metacognitive Strategies “Whenreadingforacourselikethis,Imakeupquestionstohelpfocusmyreading.” “ItrytochangethewayIstudyinordertofitthecourserequirementsandtheinstructor’steachingstrategies.”
Critical Thinking Strategies “Whenatheory,interpretation,orconclusionispresentedinclassorinthereadings,Itrytodecideifthereisgoodsupportingevidence.” “WheneverIreadorhearanassertionorconclusioninthisclass,Ialsotrytothinkofpossiblealternatives.”
Self-Regulated Learning/Effort Regulation “Iworkhardtodowellinclasseslikethis,evenifIdon’tlikewhatwe’redoing.” “Evenwhencoursematerialsaredullanduninteresting,ImanagetokeepworkinguntilIfinish.”
Self-Regulated Learning/Time Management and Study Environment “ImakesurethatIkeepupwiththeweeklyreadingsandassignmentsincourseslikethis.” ”Ihavearegularplacesetasideforstudying.”
Collaborative Learning Orientation “Whenstudyingforacourselikethis,Ioftentrytoexplainthematerialtoaclassmateorafriend.” “Itrytoworkwithotherstudentsfromclasstocompletecourseassignments.”
Help-Seeking Orientation “WhenIcan’tunderstandthematerialincourseslikethis,Iaskanotherstudentintheclassforhelp.” “ItrytoidentifystudentsinclasseslikethiswhomIcanaskforhelpifnecessary.”
LCB Scales
Learner-Centered Beliefs “Icanhelpstudentswhoareuninterestedinlearninggetintouchwiththeirnaturalmotivationtolearn.” “Accepting students where they are—no matter what their behavior and academicperformance—makesthemmorereceptivetolearning.”
Allison J. Kelaher-Young & Cynthia L. Carver
133
Non-Learner-Centered Beliefs About Learners “Evenwithfeedback,somestudentsjustcan’tfigureouttheirmistakes.” “Innateabilityisfixedandsomechildrenjustcan’tlearnaswellasothers.”
Non-Learner-Centered Beliefs About Teaching “IfIdon’tpromptandprovidedirectionforstudentquestions,studentswon’tgettherightanswer.” “Iknowbestwhatmystudentsneedtoknowandwhat’simportant;studentsshouldtakemywordthatsomethingwillberelevanttothem.”