u.s. v. alcoa world alumina (plea agreement)

Upload: mike-koehler

Post on 13-Apr-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    1/52

    UNITED STATESDISTRICTCOURT THEWESTERN DISTRICTOFPENNSYLVANIA

    UNITEDSTATES OFAMERICACRIMINALNO.

    v.

    ALCOAWORLD ALUMINA LLC,

    Defendant.

    Count FCPAAnti-BriberyProvision,

    15 U.S.C. 78dd-2 18 U.S.C. 2

    P L E A A G R E E ME N T

    TheUnitedStatesofAmerica,by and through the Fraud SectionoftheCriminalDivision

    oftheUnitedStatesDepartment of Justice and theUnitedStatesAttorney'sOfficefor the

    Districtof Pennsylvania (the"UnitedStates"or the "Department"), and the defendant,

    AlcoaWorldAluminaLLC(the "Defendant"), by and through its undersigned attorneys, and

    throughits authorized representative, pursuant to authority granted by Defendant's Board of

    Member Representatives, hereby submit and enter into this plea agreement (the "Agreement"),

    pursuant to Rule ofthe Federal Rules ofCriminalProcedure. The terms andconditionsofthisAgreement are asfollows:

    Pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. the Defendant agreesto waive itsrighttograndjuryindictment and itsrightto challenge venue in theDistrictCourt for the Western

    Districto f Pennsylvania, and to pleadguiltyto a one-countInformationcharging the Defendant

    withone count ofviolatingthe anti-bribery provisionsofthe Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of

    ("FCPA"),as amended, Title UnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-2, andTitle United

    TheDefendant's Agreement

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    2/52

    StatesCode, Section2. Uponacceptanceby the Courtof thisAgreement, the Defendant further

    agreesto persist in that plea through sentencing and, as setforthbelow, to cooperate fully with

    the Department in its investigation intoallmatters related to the conduct charged in the

    Information.

    2. The Defendantunderstandsandagreesthat this Agreement is between the

    Department and the Defendant anddoesnotbindany otherdivisionor sectionofthe Department

    ofJustice or any other federal,state,orlocalprosecuting, administrative, or regulatory authority.

    Nevertheless, the Department willbringthis Agreement and the cooperationofthe Defendant, its

    director indirect affiliates, subsidiaries, andmajority shareholder to the attention of other

    prosecuting authorities or otheragencies,i frequested by the Defendant.

    The Defendantagreesthat this Agreementwil lbe executed by an authorized

    corporate representative. The Defendant furtheragreesthat a resolutiondulyadopted by the

    Defendant's Board of Member Representatives, attached to this Agreement asExhibit 1, or in

    similarform,authorizes the Defendant to enter into this Agreement and take all necessarysteps

    to effectuate this Agreement, and that the signatures on this Agreement by the Defendant and its

    counsel are authorized by the Defendant's Board of Member Representatives on behalfof the

    Defendant. In connectionwiththis Agreement, the Defendant wi l l also provide to the

    Department acertified resolutionofthe Board ofDirectorsofAlcoa Inc., attached asExhibit2

    hereto, or in similarform,that provides thatAlcoa Inc. ("Alcoa"),and its subsidiaries, divisions,

    groups and affiliates, except for the Defendant,agreeto certain undertakings as setforth inthis

    Agreement inexchangefor theUnitedStates'agreement in paragraph 20.

    4. Except as may otherwise be agreed by the parties hereto in connectionwitha

    particulartransaction, the Defendantagreesthat if ,at any timewhilethe Defendant has

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    3/52

    obligationsunder this Agreement, the Defendant sells, merges, or transfers allor substantially all

    of itsbusinessoperations as they exist asofthedateo fthisAgreement, whether such sale(s)

    is/are structured as a stock orassetsale, merger, or transfer, the Defendant shall include in any

    contract for sale, merger, or transfer aprovisionfullybindingthe purchaser(s) or any

    successor(s)in interest thereto to theguaranteesandobligationsdescribed inthis Agreement.

    5. The Defendant waives any statute oflimitationswithregard to any conduct

    relatingto corrupt payments and related internal accounting controls or books and records

    violationsas dateofthis Agreement through the full termofthe Defendant's probation anduntilall ofthe Defendant's obligationsunder this Agreement have been satisfied.

    6. The Defendantagreesandrepresentsthat it has the full legalright,power, and

    authorityto enter intoand performall ofits obligations under this Agreement.

    7. The Defendantagreesto pay theUnitedStatesacriminal inthe amount of$209,000,000 in equal annual installments of Thefirstpayment shall be madein full on or before the tenth (10)businessday after thedateofthe entryo fthe judgment of

    convictionfollowingthe Defendant's sentencing, and the second,third,fourthand fifth

    payments shall be due infull, respectively, on thefirst, second,third,and fourth-year

    anniversaries ofthe entryo fthe judgment ofconviction. The Defendantagreestowire transfer

    thesepayments to the Clerk ofthe Court for theUnitedStatesDistrictCourt for the Western

    Districto fPennsylvania. The Defendant furtheragreesto pay the Clerkofthe Court for the

    UnitedStatesDistrictCourt for the WesternDistrictof Pennsylvania the mandatory special

    assessmentof$400withinten businessdays fromthedateof entry ofthe judgment ofconviction. The Defendant acknowledges that no tax deductions may be sought in connection

    withthe payment ofthe

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    4/52

    As a resultofthe conduct as setforth inthe Statement of Facts,attached asExhibit3 hereto, the partiesagreethe Departmentcouldinstituteaciviland/or

    criminalforfeiture action against certain funds held by the Defendant and that such fundswould

    beforfeitablepursuant toTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section andTitle28,UnitedStatesCode, Section The Defendant hereby acknowledges that at least wasinvolved intransactions described inExhibit3inviolationofTitle UnitedStatesCode,Section78dd-2 andTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section2. The Defendant herebyagreestoadministrativelyforfeitto theUnitedStatesthe sum of $14,000,000 (the "ForfeitureAmount").

    The Defendant andAlcoaherebyagreethat,inthe event the funds used to pay the Forfeiture

    Amountare notdirectlytraceable to the transactions, the monies used to pay the Forfeiture

    Amountshall be considered substituteresfor the purpose offorfeitureto theUnitedStates

    pursuant toTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section and the Defendant andAlcoareleaseanyandallright,title,interest, and claims they may have to such funds. Toaccomplishthis

    administrativeforfeiture,the Defendantagreesto pay the ForfeitureAmountplus any associated

    transferfeeswithinten(10)business daysofthe date ofentryofthejudgmentofconviction

    followingthe Defendant's sentencing by check orwiretransfer made payable to theUnited

    StatesInternalRevenueService-Criminal Investigation. The Defendant andAlcoaagreeto sign

    anyadditionaldocumentsnecessaryto completeforfeiture ofthefunds. The Defendant and

    Alcoatake nopositionas to thedispositionofthe funds after payment andwaiveany statutory or

    proceduralnotice requirementswithrespect to theUnited dispositionofthefunds. TheDefendant andAlcoa knowinglyandvoluntarilywaive anyclaimor defense they may have

    under theEighthAmendmentoftheUnitedStatesConstitution,includinganyclaimof excessive

    fineorpenaltywithrespect to theforfeited assets. Inthe event ofabreachofthisAgreement,

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    5/52

    the Defendant andAlcoaacknowledge that theUnitedStatesmaypursueadditionalciviland

    criminalforfeiture inexcessofthe Forfeiture Amount.

    9. The Defendantagreesto abide byallterms and obligationsofthis Agreement as

    described herein,including,but notlimitedto, the following:

    a. to pleadguiltyas setforth inthis Agreement;

    b. to abide by all sentencing stipulations contained in this Agreement;

    c. toappear,through itsdulyappointed representatives, as ordered for all

    courtappearances,and obey any other ongoing court order in this matter;

    d. to commit no further crimes;

    e. to betruthful atalltimeswiththe Court;

    f. to pay the applicable and specialassessment;andg. to continue to participate in and abide by the Corporate Compliance

    Program established byAlcoa,whichAlcoahasseparately agreedto continue to implement and

    maintain,attached asExhibit4.

    The Defendant agreesto continue tocooperatefully withthe Department, the

    InternalRevenueService-CriminalInvestigationsDivision(the"IRS"),the Federal Bureau of

    Investigation(the"FBF'),and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") in a

    manner consistentwithapplicable law and regulations, in any and all matters relating to the

    conduct described in this Agreement andExhibit3, and other conduct under investigationby the

    Department that has commenced before or during the termofthisAgreement,untilthedateupon

    whichallinvestigations and prosecutions arising out of such conduct are concluded, whether or

    notthoseinvestigations and prosecutions are concludedwithinthe term of Defendant's probation

    inparagraph Attherequestof the Department, the Defendant shallalso cooperate fully

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    6/52

    withforeign law enforcement authorities andagenciesand theMultilateralDevelopment Banks

    ("MDBs"). Such cooperation shall include, but not belimitedto, the following:

    a. The Defendant shall, to the extent consistent withthe foregoing, truthfully

    disclose to the Department allfactualinformationnot protected by avalidclaimo f attorney-

    client privilegeorworkproduct doctrine protectionwithrespectto the activitiesDefendant, Alcoaand their affiliates, theirpresentand former member representatives, directors,

    officers,employees,agents,consultants, contractors, and subcontractors, concerningallmatters

    relatingto corrupt payments to foreignpublicofficials or to employees ofprivatecustomersor

    concerning related internal controls or books and records violationsaboutwhichthe Defendant

    orAlcoahaveany knowledge and aboutwhichthe Department, theFBI,the IRS, the SEC, or, at

    therequestofthe Department, any foreign law enforcement authorities andagenciesandMDBs,

    shallinquire;

    b. The Defendant shall provide to the Department, uponrequest,any non-

    privilegedor non-protected document, record, or other tangible evidence relating to such corrupt

    payments to foreignpublicofficials or to employees of privatecustomersaboutwhichthe

    aforementioned authorities andagenciesshall inquireofthe Defendant, to the directionofthe Department; and

    c. The Defendant shallensurethat the Department is givenaccessto all

    current, and to the extent possible, former member representatives, officers, employees,agents,

    and consultants of the Defendant andAlcoafor interviews and testimony in theUnitedStates

    relatingto such payments.

    The Defendantagreesthat i f itor any ofitsdirect or indirect affiliates or

    subsidiariesissuesapressreleaseor holds apressconference in connectionwiththis Agreement,

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    7/52

    the Defendant shallfirstconsultwiththe Department to determine whether (a) the textreleaseor proposedstatementsat anypressconference are true andaccuratewithrespectto

    matters between the Department and the Defendant andAlcoa;and (b) the Department has no

    objectionto thereleaseor statement. Statementsat anypressconference concerning this matter

    shallbe consistentwiththispressrelease.

    Alcoa's Agreement

    12. Inexchangefor theUnitedStates'agreement inparagraph Alcoaagreesthat itand its subsidiaries, divisions, groups and affiliates will fulfill the commitments and be bound to

    the terms outlined inparagraphs8, 9(g), and 13 to 19 of this Agreement and inExhibits2 and 4

    attached hereto.

    Alcoaagreestoguarantee,secureandensuredelivery by the Defendant of all

    payments duefromthe Defendant under the Agreement;provided,however, that suchguarantee

    shallbe expressly conditioned upon the Court'sacceptanceofthe Agreement and entryjudgment consistentwith all ofthe Agreement. Alcoaacknowledges that no taxdeductions may be sought in connectionwiththe payment

    Alcoaagreesnot to institute or participate in any proceeding to interferewith,

    alter, or bar enforcement of any penalty, specialassessmentor forfeiture order imposed onthe Defendant pursuant to this Agreement pursuant to the automatic stay or otherprovisionUnitedStatesBankruptcy Code.

    Except as may otherwise be

    by the parties hereto in connectionwitha

    particulartransaction,Alcoaagreesthat if ,at any timewhile Alcoa stillhas obligations and

    commitments to theUnitedStatesas set forth inthis Agreement,Alcoasells, merges, or transfers

    all or substantially all ofitsbusinessoperations as they exist as date Agreement,

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    8/52

    whether such sale(s) is/are structured as a stock orassetsale, merger, or transfer,Alcoashall

    includein any contract for sale, merger, or transfer aprovisionfully bindingthe purchaser(s) or

    any in interest thereto to theguaranteesandobligationsdescribed in this Agreement.Alcoaagreesthat i t and its subsidiaries,divisions,groups and affiliates shall

    continue to cooperate fully on matters and in a manner substantiallysimilarto the cooperation

    requiredoftheDefendant in paragraphs withthe Department, theIRS,theFBI,and theSEC. Such cooperation shall be in a manner consistentwithapplicable law and regulations.

    Thisincludes cooperatingfullyin anyinvestigationofAlcoaand its subsidiaries, divisions,

    groups andaffiliates,and any ofitspresent and formerofficers,directors, employees,agentsand

    consultants, or any other party, in any andallmattersrelatingto this Agreement andExhibit3.

    Alcoaagreesthat i f itor any ofitsdirect or indirect affiliates or subsidiaries

    issuesapressreleaseor holds apressconference in connectionwiththis Agreement,Alcoashall

    first consultwiththe Department to determine whether (a) the text of thereleaseor proposed

    statementsat anypressconference are true and accurate withrespect to matters between the

    Department and the Defendant andAlcoa;and (b) the Department has no objection to therelease

    orstatement. Statements at anypressconference concerning this matter shall be consistent with

    thispressrelease.

    Other than as may benecessarywithrespect todefenseo fcivil litigationor

    arbitration relatingto this matter,Alcoawaivesallrights,whetherasserteddirectlyor by a

    representative, to request or receivefromany department or agency oftheUnitedStatesany

    records pertaining to theinvestigationor prosecution case,includingwithoutlimitationany records that may be sought under the Freedom ofInformationAct, Title5,UnitedStates

    Code, Section 552, or the PrivacyAct, Title5,UnitedStatesCode, Section 552a.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    9/52

    Alcoawaives alldefenses basedon thestatuteoflimitations,venue,speedytrial

    under theUnitedStatesConstitutionand theSpeedyTrialAct, and any and all constitutional and

    defenseswithrespectto any prosecution ofAlcoathat is not time-barred on

    thedatethat this Agreement is signed related to or arisingfromthe conduct charged in the

    Informationto be filedagainst the Defendant, in the event thatAlcoa failstofulfill its

    commitments as setforth in this Agreement for anyreason,provided such prosecution is brought

    withinone year of such breach or failure plus the remaining time periodof thestatuteo f

    limitationsas of thedatethat this Agreement is signed.

    The United Agreement20. Inexchangefor theguiltyplea ofthe Defendant and the complete fulfillmentof

    all of the Defendant's and Alcoa's obligations as setforthin this Agreement, the Department

    agreesthat itwil lnot file additionalcriminalchargesagainst the Defendant orAlcoa,or any of

    theirdirect or indirect affiliates or subsidiaries, relating to (a) any ofthe conduct described in the

    Statement of Facts, attached asExhibit3, or thecriminalinformation filedpursuant to this

    Agreement or (b)informationdisclosed by the Defendant orAlcoato the Departmentpriorto the

    dateofthisAgreement. This paragraphdoesnot provide any protection against prosecution for

    any corrupt payments, false accounting, or failure to implement internal controls or

    circumventionofinternalcontrols,if any, madeinthe future by the Defendant orAlcoa. This

    Agreementdoesnot close or preclude the investigation or prosecution of any naturalpersons,

    includingany officers, directors, member representatives, employees, agents,or consultants of

    the Defendant orAlcoa,who mayhave beeninvolvedin any ofthe matters setforth in the

    Information,Statement of Facts, or in any other matters.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    10/52

    FactualBasis

    The Defendant is pleadingguiltybecauseit isguiltyof the charge contained in the

    Information. The Defendant admits,agrees,and stipulatesonlythat the factual allegationswith

    respect to its conduct as setforth inthe Statement of Facts, attached hereto asExhibit3 and

    incorporated herein, are true and correct, that it is responsible for theactsofitsofficers and

    employees describedinthe Statement of Facts, and that the Statement ofFactsaccurately reflects

    the Defendant's criminalconduct.

    Defendant's WaiverofRights, Includingthe Right to Appeal

    22. Federal Rule ofCriminalProcedure and Federal RuleofEvidence limittheadmissibilityo fstatementsmade in the course ofplea proceedings or plea discussions in both

    civilandcriminalproceedings, i ftheguiltyplea is laterwithdrawn. The Defendant expressly

    warrants that it has discussed theseruleswithits counsel and understands them. Solely to the

    extent setforthbelow,the Defendantvoluntarilywaives and gives up the rights enumerated in

    Federal Rule ofCriminalProcedure and Federal Rule of Evidence Specifically, theDefendant understands andagreesthat anystatementsthat it makes in the course ofitsguilty

    plea or in connectionwiththe Agreement are admissible against it for any purpose in any U.S.

    federalcriminalproceeding if,even though the Department has fulfilled allo fitsobligations

    under this Agreement and the Court has imposed the agreed-upon sentence,the Defendant

    nevertheless withdrawsitsguiltyplea.

    23. The Defendant is satisfied that the Defendant's attorneys have rendered effective

    assistance. The Defendant understands that by enteringintothis Agreement, the Defendant

    surrenders certain rights as providedinthis Agreement. The Defendant understands that the

    rightsofcriminaldefendants include the following:

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    11/52

    a. I f the Defendant had persisted in a plea of notguiltyto the charges, the

    Defendantwouldhave therightto aspeedyjurytrial withtheassistanceofcounsel. Thetrial

    may be conducted by a judgesitting withoutajury i fthe Defendant, theUnitedStates,and the

    Courtallagree.

    b. At atrial,theUnitedStateswouldbe required to present its witnesses and

    other evidence against the Defendant. The Defendantwouldbe able to confront and cross-

    examineadversewitnesses. Inturn,the Defendantcould,butwouldnot be requiredto,present

    witnesses and other evidence on itsownbehalf. I fthe witnesses for the Defendantwouldnot

    appearvoluntarily,the Defendantcouldrequire theirattendancethrough the subpoena power of

    the Court.

    c. At atrial,no inference ofguiltcouldbe drawnfromthe Defendant's

    refusalto present evidence. However,i fthe Defendant desired to do so, itcould present

    evidence on itsownbehalf.

    24. The Defendant also understands thatTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section 3742,affordsa defendant therightto appeal thesentence imposed. Nonetheless, the Defendant

    knowinglywaives therightto appeal theconvictionandsentenceimposed by the Court,

    providedthat suchsentenceis consistentwiththe terms Agreement, in exchange forconcessions made by theUnitedStatesinthis Agreement. This Agreementdoesnot affect the

    rightsorobligationsoftheUnitedStatesas setforthinTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section3742(b).

    25. The Defendant is also aware that theUnitedStatesConstitutionand the laws of

    theUnitedStatesaffordthe Defendant therightto contest or"collaterallyattack" itsconviction

    orsentenceafter theconvictionhas become final. Knowingthat, the Defendant knowingly

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    12/52

    waives therightto contest or"collaterallyattack" the Defendant's plea,conviction,andsentence,

    providedthat suchsentenceis consistentwiththe termsofthis Agreement, bymeanspost-convictionproceeding.

    26. Other than as may benecessarywithrespect todefenseofcivillitigationor

    arbitration relatingto this matter, the Defendant also hereby waivesallrights,whetherasserted

    directlyor by a representative, to request or receive fromany department or agency UnitedStatesany records pertaining to theinvestigationor prosecutionofthiscase,including without

    limitationany records that may be sought under the Freedom ofInformationAct, Title5,United

    StatesCode, Section 552, or the PrivacyAct, Title5,UnitedStatesCode, Section 552a.

    27. The Defendant waives alldefenses basedon the statute oflimitationsand venue

    withrespect to any prosecution that is not time-barred on thedatethat this Agreement is signed

    inthe event that: (a) theconvictionis later vacated for any reason; (b) the Defendant or Alcoa

    violatesthis Agreement; or (c) the plea is laterwithdrawn,provided such prosecution is brought

    withinone year of any such vacation ofconviction,violationof agreement, orwithdrawalofplea

    plus the remaining time period statute oflimitationsasofthedatethat this Agreement issigned. The Department free to take anypositionon appeal or any other post-judgment matter.

    28. The Defendant waives alldefensesto its conduct charged inthe Information

    basedon venue,speedytrialunder the UnitesStatesConstitutionand the SpeedyTrialAct,and

    any and allconstitutionalandnon-jurisdictional defects.

    29. The Defendant acknowledges that no threats have been made against the

    Defendant and that the Defendant is pleadingguiltyfreely andvoluntarilybecausethe Defendant

    isguilty.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    13/52

    Penalty

    30. The statutorymaximumsentencethat the Court can impose for aviolationofTitle

    UnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-2, is a of $2,000,000 ortwicethegrosspecuniary gainorgrosspecuniary loss resultingfromthe offense, whichever isgreatest,Title UnitedStatesCode, Section and(d); years' probation,Title UnitedStatesCode, Section

    and a mandatory specialassessmentof $400,Title18,UnitedStatesCode, Section

    3013(a)(2)(B).

    The Defendant hereby stipulates andagreesnot to institute or participate in any

    proceeding to interferewith,alter, or bar enforcement of anyfine,penalty, specialassessmentor

    forfeiture order pursuant to the automatic stay or otherprovisiono ftheUnitedStatesBankruptcy

    Code.

    32. The Defendantagreesthatnothingi nthis Agreement is intended toreleasethe

    Defendant fromany and allofthe Defendant's excise and income taxliabilitiesand reporting

    obligationsfor any and all income not properly reported and/or legallyorillegallyobtained or

    derived.

    Sentencing Recommendation

    TheUnitedStatesand the Defendantagreethat pursuant to UnitedStates v.

    Booker,543 U.S. 220 (2005), the Court must determine an advisory sentencing guidelinerange

    pursuant to theUnitedStatesSentencing Guidelines. The Court wil lthen determine areasonable

    sentencewithinthe statutoryrangeafter considering the advisory sentencing guidelinerangeand

    the factors listed inTitle 18,UnitedStatesCode, Section 3553(a). The parties' agreement herein

    toany guideline sentencing factors constitutesproofofthosefactors sufficient to satisfy the

    applicable burden of proof.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    14/52

    34. The UnitedStatesand the Defendantagreethat afaithful applicationofthe

    UnitedStatesSentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) to determine the applicable rangeyields thefollowing analysis:

    a. The 2012 U.S.S.G. are applicable to this matter.

    b. Offense Based upon U.S.S.G. 2C1.1,the total offense level is 48,calculated as follows:

    (a)(2) BaseOffense Level

    (1) MultipleBribes

    Value of benefit received

    Morethan $400,000,000

    Offense involvedahigh-leveldecision-making

    public official

    TOTAL

    c. BaseFine. Based upon U.S.S.G. 8C2.4(a)(l) and 2Cl.l(d),thebase

    fineis $446,000,000 (the pecuniary gainfrom the offense)

    d. CulpabilityScore. Based upon U.S.S.G.

    the culpabilityscoreis5, calculated as follows:

    (a) BaseCulpabilityScore 5

    (4) the organization had 50 or more employees and

    anindividualwithinsubstantial authority

    personnel participatedin,condoned, or was

    willfully ignorantofthe offense +2

    (g)(1) The organizationfullycooperated in the

    investigationand clearly demonstrated recognitionand affirmativeacceptanceof responsibilityfor its

    criminalconduct

    -2

    12

    +2

    +30

    +4

    48

    TOTAL 5

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    15/52

    Calculationo fFine Range:

    BaseFine $446,000,000

    Multipliers 1.0(min)/2.0(max)

    Fine Range $446,000,000 / $892,000,000

    35. Pursuant to Rule Federal Rules ofCriminalProcedure, theUnitedStatesand the Defendantagreethat thefollowingrepresentsthe appropriatedisposition

    of thecase:

    Defendantagreethat the appropriatedispositiono fthiscaseis, andagreeto recommendjointly,

    that the Court impose asentencerequiringthe Defendant to pay to theUnitedStatesacriminal

    fineof $209,000,000. Becausethe immediate paymentofthe entirefine "wouldposean undue

    burden on" the Defendant andAlcoa,U.S.S.G. 8C3.2(b),theUnitedStatesand the Defendant

    agreethat the entire shall be paid in equal annual installments of withthefirstpayment due infull on or before the tenth businessday after thedateof the entry ofthe judgment ofconviction. Thereafter, the second,third,fourthandfifth payments shall each be

    due infull,respectively, on thefirst, second,third,and fourth-year anniversaries ofthedateof

    the entryo fjudgment ofconviction("the recommended sentence"). TheUnitedStatesand the

    Defendant have agreed that afineof $209,000,000 is the appropriatedispositionbasedon the

    following factors andthosein U.S.C.3553(a): (a) the impact of a penalty withintheguidelinesrange on thefinancial conditionofthe Defendant's majority shareholder, Alcoa,and

    itspotential to "substantiallyjeopardiz[e]"Alcoa'sabilityto compete,seeU.S.S.G. 8C3.3(b),

    including,but notlimitedto, itsabilitytofundits sustaining andimprovingcapital expenditures,

    a. Fine. Pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. theUnitedStatesand the

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    16/52

    itsabilityto invest inresearchand development, itsabilityto fund its pension obligations, and its

    abilityto maintainnecessarycashreservesto fund its operations andmeetitsliabilities;(b) the

    significant remedy being imposed on the Defendant's majorityshareholder,Alcoa, by the U.S.

    Securities andExchangeCommission for Alcoa's conduct inthis matter; (c) after learningallegations of FCPAviolations,Alcoa's Board of Directors appointed a Special Committee of

    the Board of Directors tooverseean internal investigation by independent counsel; (d) the

    substantial cooperation provided to the Department by the Defendant's majorityshareholder,

    Alcoa,including conducting an extensive internal investigation,voluntarilymakingemployees

    available for interviews, andcollecting,analyzing, and organizing voluminous evidence and

    informationfor the Department; (e) the remedial efforts already undertaken and to be undertaken

    bythe Defendant's majorityshareholder,Alcoa, which affect both the Defendant's operations

    andthoseofAlcoa, includingthehiringof new senior legal and ethics and compliance officers

    and the implementation ofenhanceddue diligence reviews ofthe retentionofthird-partyagents

    and consultants; and (f) Alcoa'sseparatecommitment to ensuring that its anti-corruption

    compliance programwil lbe maintained to continue to satisfy theminimumelementsset forthin

    Exhibit4 to this Agreement.

    b. Mandatory SpecialAssessment. The Defendant shall pay to the Clerk of

    the Court for the UnitedStatesDistrictCourt for the WesternDistrictof Pennsylvania withinten

    businessdaysofthedateofthe entry of the judgment ofconvictionthe mandatory special

    assessmentof $400.

    c. A Term of Four Years Probation. A four-year termofprobation shall be

    imposed on the Defendant. The term of probation shall include the following mandatory and

    discretionary special conditions,pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 3563(a) and (b): (i) The Defendant

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    17/52

    shallnot commit another federal,stateorlocalcrime;(ii)the Defendant shall provide the

    probationofficer withanyinformationor documents requested by the probationofficer; (iii)the

    Defendant shallnotify the Court of any materialchangeinthe Defendant's economic

    circumstances that might affect the Defendant's abilityto pay the fines and other financial

    obligationssetforthherein; and(iv)the Defendant shall pay thecriminal setforthinparagraph 35(a) above.

    d. Court NotBound. This Agreement is presented to the Court pursuant to

    Fed. R.Crim.P. The Defendantunderstandsthat, i fthe Court rejects thisAgreement, the Court must: (a)informthe parties that the Court rejects the Agreement; (b)

    advise the Defendant's counsel that the Court is not required tofollowthe Agreement and afford

    the Defendant theopportunitytowithdrawits plea; and (c) advise the Defendant that i fthe plea

    isnotwithdrawn,the Court maydisposeofthiscaselessfavorably toward the Defendant than

    the Agreement contemplated. I fthe Court this Agreement pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P.theUnitedStatesand the Defendantagreethat the Defendant wi l lbeallowedto

    withdrawits plea, and that neither the Defendant nor theUnitedStatesshall be bound by the

    provisionsofthisAgreement. I fthe Defendantwithdrawsits plea ofguiltyunder the

    circumstances described in the immediately precedingsentence,this Agreement, theguiltyplea,

    and any statementmadein thecourseof any proceeding under Fed. R.Crim.P. regarding theguiltyplea or this Agreement, ormadeinthecourseofplea discussions withan attorney for the

    UnitedStates,shall not be admissible against the Defendant in anycriminalorcivil proceeding.

    The Defendant, however, alsounderstandsthat i fthe Courtacceptsthis Agreement, the Court is

    bound by the sentencing provisionsinparagraphs35(a), (b) and (c).

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    18/52

    36. The parties furtheragree,withthe permission of the Court, to waive the

    requirement ofapre-sentenceinvestigationreport pursuant to Federal Rule ofCriminal

    Procedure 32(c)(l)(A)(ii),basedon afindingby the Court that the record contains information

    sufficient toenablethe Court to meaningfully exercise its sentencing power. The partiesagree,

    however, that in the event the Court orders the preparation of apre-sentenceinvestigationreport

    priorto sentencing, such orderwi l lnot affect the Agreement set forthherein. Inthe event the

    Courtso orders, the Department wil l fully informthe preparer of thepre-sentencereport and the

    Courtofthe facts and law related to the Defendant's case.

    37. The parties furtheragreeto ask the Court's permission to combine the entryplea and sentencing into one proceeding, and to conduct the plea and sentencing hearings Defendant in one proceeding. The partiesagree,however, that inthe event the Court orders that

    the entry guiltyplea and sentencing hearing occur atseparateproceedings, such an orderwillnot affect the Agreement setforthherein.

    Breachof Agreement

    38. The Defendantagreesthat if itbreachesthe terms ofthis Agreement, commits any

    federal crimesubsequentto thedateofthis Agreement, or has provided or provides deliberately

    false, incomplete, or misleadinginformationin connectionwiththis Agreement, the Department

    may, in its sole discretion, characterize such conduct as a breach Agreement. Inthe eventofsuch a breach, (a) the Departmentwil lbe free fromits obligations under the Agreement and

    may take whateverpositionit believes appropriate as to thesentence;(b) the Defendant wil lnot

    havetherighttowithdrawtheguiltyplea; (c) the Defendant shall befully subject tocriminal

    prosecution for any other crimes that it has committed,if any, includingperjury and obstruction

    ofjustice;and (d) the Departmentwil lbe free to use against the Defendant, directly and

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    19/52

    indirectly,in anycriminalorcivilproceeding any informationor materials provided by theDefendant andAlcoapursuant to this Agreement, aswellas the admitted Statement of Facts.

    39. In the event of a breach ofthis Agreement by the Defendant, i fthe Department

    electsto pursuecriminalchargesor anycivilor administrative action that was notfiledas a

    result of this Agreement, then:

    a. The Defendantagreesthat any applicablestatuteoflimitationsistolled

    between thedateofthe Defendant's signingofthis Agreement and the discovery by the

    Department of any breach by the Defendant, plus one year; and

    b. The Defendant gives up alldefenses basedon thestatuteoflimitations

    relatingto the facts and conduct describedinthe Statement ofFactsand thecriminal information

    tobefiledagainst the Defendant pursuant to this Agreement, anyclaimof delay,or anyspeedytrialclaimwithrespectto any such prosecution or action, except to the extent that

    suchdefensesexisted asofthedateofthe signingofthis Agreement.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    20/52

    Complete Agreement

    40. This documentstatesthe fullextent ofthe agreement between the parties. There

    are no other promises or agreements, expressorimplied. Any modification Agreementshallbevalidonly i fsetforthinwritingin a supplemental or revised plea agreement signed by

    allparties.

    AGREED:

    FOR ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC:

    Date:January

    Date:January

    By:

    By:

    DECHERTBy: Robert J.Jossen

    No. 1393719Jonathan R. StreeterN Y No. 5034186Counsel for

    AlcoaWorldAlumina LLC

    THE DEPARTMENTOFJUSTICE:

    JEFFREYH . KNOX

    Chief,Fraud Section

    CriminalDivision,Department of Justice

    By:

    AdamG.DeputyChief, Fraud SectionNY ID No. 2657567

    AndrewN .Gentin

    DC ID No. 459889

    AllanJ. Medina

    AndrewH .Warren

    TrialAttorneys,Fraud Section

    By:

    DAVID J. IIICKTON

    AttorneyPA No. 34524

    Date: January 2014

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    21/52

    OF F I C ER ' S C E R T I F I C A T E

    I have read this Agreement and carefully reviewed every part ofitwithoutside counsel

    for AlcoaWorldAluminaLLC (the "Defendant"). I understand the terms ofthisAgreement and

    voluntarilyagree,on behalf of the Defendant, to each ofits terms. Before signing this

    Agreement, I consulted outside counsel for the Defendant. Counselfullyadvised meof the

    rightsofthe Defendant, ofpossibledefenses, ofthe Sentencing Guidelines' provisions, and of

    theconsequencesof enteringintothis Agreement.

    I have carefully reviewed the terms Agreementwiththe BoardofMemberRepresentatives of the Defendant. I have advised andcausedoutside counsel for the Defendant

    to advise the Board ofMemberRepresentatives fully ofthe rights of the Defendant, of possible

    defenses, ofthe Sentencing Guidelines' provisions, ando ftheconsequenceso f enteringintothe

    Agreement.

    I have read this Statement ofFactsand carefully reviewed every part o fitwithoutside

    counsel for the Defendant. Ivoluntarilyagree,on behalfofthe Defendant, that the Statement of

    Facts, to the extentinvolvingthe conductofthe Defendant, is true and accurate.

    No promises or inducements have been made other thanthosecontained in this

    Agreement. Furthermore, no one has threatened or forced me, or to my knowledge any person

    authorizingthis Agreement on behalf ofthe Defendant, in any way to enterintothis Agreement.

    I am also satisfiedwithoutside counsel's representation inthismatter. Icertifythat I am

    / / /

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    22/52

    Secretary ofAlcoaWorldAluminaLLCand that Ihave beendulyauthorized by the Defendant

    toexecute this Agreement on behalfofthe Defendant.

    Date: January ft , 2014

    ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC

    Secretary

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    23/52

    C E R T I F I C A T E OFCOUNSE L

    We are counsel for AlcoaWorldAluminaLLC(the "Defendant") in the matter covered

    bythis Agreement. In connectionwithsuch representation, wehaveexamined the relevant

    documentsandhave discussedthetermsofthis Agreement withthe Defendant's Board of

    MemberRepresentatives. Basedon our review of the foregoing materials anddiscussions,we

    are of the opinion that therepresentativeof the Defendant signing this Agreement hasbeenduly

    authorized toenterinto this Agreement on behalf Defendant and that this Agreement hasbeenduly andvalidlyauthorized, executed, and delivered on behalf of the Defendant and is a

    validand binding obligationofthe Defendant. Further, wehavecarefully reviewed thetermsof

    this Agreement withthe BoardofMemberRepresentativesand the Legal Counsel and Company

    SecretaryofAlcoaWorldAluminaLLC. Wehavefully advised themofthe rightsDefendant, of possibledefenses, Sentencing Guidelines' provisions and of theconsequencesof entering into this Agreement.

    Wehavecarefully reviewed theabove StatementofFactswithour client. To our

    knowledge, the decision of the Defendant to stipulate tothesefacts, to the extent involvingthe

    conduct Defendant, basedon the authorization Board of MemberRepresentatives,isan informed and voluntary one.

    Toour knowledge, the decisiono fthe Defendant toenterinto this Agreement,basedon

    the authorizationofthe Board of MemberRepresentatives,is an informed and voluntary one.

    Date: January , 2014

    By: Robert J.Jossen

    JonathanR.Streeter

    Counsel for AlcoaWorldAlumina LLC

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    24/52

    E X H IB IT1

    C E R T I F I C A T E OF CORPORATE RESOLUTIONSO F

    A L C O A WORLD ALUMINA L L C

    A copyofthe executed Certificate of Corporate Resolutions ofAlcoaWorldAlumina

    LLC is annexed hereto asExhibit

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    25/52

    A L C O A W O R L D ALUMINA L L C

    C E R T I F I C A T E OF C O R P O R A T E RESOLUTIONS

    I , Jeffrey D. Heeter, do hereby certify that I am the Secretary ofAlcoa World Alumina

    LLC(the "Company"), a majority-owned subsidiary ofAlcoaInc. formed under the lawsStateof Delaware and maintaining its principal place ofbusinessin Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,

    and that the following is an accurate excerpt of certain resolutions adopted by the Board ofMember Representatives of the Company at a meeting held on December 9, atwhich aquorumwaspresent:

    WH EREAS, the Board of Member Representatives of the Company has

    been informed by its counsel of a proposed settlement with the United States

    Department of Justice ("DOJ") in relation to certain matters which have been

    under investigation by DOJ (the "Proposed Settlement"), and the key terms of the

    Proposed Settlementhave beenreviewedwiththe members of the Board;

    WH EREAS,the Proposed Settlement contemplates:

    (1) The Company pleading guilty to one count ofviolating the anti-

    bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of as amended,pursuant to a plea agreement withthe DOJ (the "Plea Agreement");

    (2) the government and the Company agreeing to recommend to the

    Court a of $209,000,000 payable in equal annual installments of$41,800,000, as appropriate under the circumstances; and the Company agreeing

    topay to theUnited Statesan administrative, non-refundable forfeiture amount of

    $14,000,000;

    (3) the Court retaining the ability toacceptor the terms of thePlea Agreement under Fed. R.Crim.P.

    (4) imposition on the Company of certain commitments set out in the

    Plea Agreement;

    (5) the Company agreeing to include in any agreement for the sale,

    merger or transfer ofallor substantially all ofitsbusinessoperations as they exist

    onthedate Plea Agreement the requirement that thesuccessororpurchasercompany abide by the commitments set out inclauses(2) and (4) above; and

    (6) The Company agreeing to (a) a knowing waiver of its rights to a

    speedy trialpursuant to the SixthAmendment to theUnited StatesConstitution,Title United States Code, Section and Federal Rule of CriminalProcedure (b) a knowing waiver forpurposes of the Plea Agreement andany charges by the United States arising out of the conduct described in the

    Statement ofFacts attached to the Plea Agreement or the criminal Information

    any with respectto venue, andconsentsto the entry of aguiltyplea, asprovided pursuant to the terms of the Plea Agreement, in the United States

    DistrictCourt for the WesternDistrictof Pennsylvania; and (c) aknowingwaiver

    of anydefenses basedon thestatuteo flimitationsfor any prosecution relating to

    the conduct described i n the Statement of Facts, criminalInformation,or relating

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    26/52

    to conduct known to the DOJpriorto thedateonwhichthe Plea Agreement was

    signed that is not time-barred by the applicablestatuteoflimitationson thedateof

    the signingofthe Plea Agreement.

    NOW, T HE RE FO RE , BE IT:

    R E S O L V E D , that the Board of Member Representatives Company,after thorough consideration ofal l relevantissues,includingconsidering thecostsand benefits of settlement, and considering the advice and conclusions of outside

    legalcounsel and management, deemsit advisable and in thebestinterests of the

    Company and its relevant constituencies for the Board of Member

    Representatives to approve the key terms of the Proposed Settlement that have

    beenreviewedwiththe Board at this meeting, and such key terms ProposedSettlement be and they hereby are approved substantially as presented at this

    meeting; and

    F U R T H E R R E S O L V E D , that the proper officers and Member

    Representatives of the Company, and counsel for the Company, are eachhereby

    authorized and directed to execute and deliver allagreements, instruments anddocuments, and to take such other and further actions whichin theopinionof any

    of them may be necessary or desirable to achieve the purposes of or to

    consummate the Proposed Settlement and the resolution of the investigation of

    past payments and practices referenced in the Plea Agreement, including

    appearing before the United States District Court for the Western District of

    Pennsylvania to enter a plea ofguiltyon behalf of the Company andaccept the

    sentence Court, the taldng of any such action or the execution and deliveryof any such agreements, instruments or documents to be conclusive evidence of

    the authority to take, execute or deliver thesame.

    I further certify that the aforesaid resolutionshavenotbeenamended or revoked in any

    respectand remain infullforce and effect on thedateof thiscertification.

    IN WITNESS W H E R E O F , Ihaveexecuted this Certificate on January 8,

    Jeffrey D. Heeter

    Secretary

    AlcoaWorldAlumina LLC

    Signed before me this dayNotary inand for the ofPennsylvania , / /

    2014.

    NotarialJennifer Notary Public

    of Pittsburgh, Allegheny CountyCommission June6, 2017

    OF

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    27/52

    E X H IB IT2

    C E R T I F I C A T E OF CORPORATE RESOLUTIONSOF

    A L C O A INC.

    Acopy of the executed Certificate of Corporate Resolutions ofAlcoaInc. is annexed

    heretoasExhibit2.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    28/52

    ALCOA INC.

    C E R T I F I C A T E OF CORPORATE RESO LUTIO NS

    I , Brenda A. Hart, do hereby certify that I am an Assistant Secretary ofAlcoaInc. (the

    "Company"), a company incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,and that the following is an accurate excerpt o f certain resolutions adopted by the Board of

    Directors of the Company at a meeting held on December 6, at which a quorum waspresent:

    WHEREAS, the Board ofDirectorsof the Company has been informed

    by its counsel of a proposed settlement with the United StatesDepartment of

    Justice ("DOJ") inrelationto certain matterswhichhave been underinvestigation

    by DOJ (the "Proposed Settlement"), and the key terms of the Proposed

    Settlement have been reviewedwiththe members ofthe Board;

    WHEREAS, the Proposed Settlement contemplates:

    (1) The Company's majority-owned affiliated entity, Alcoa World

    Alumina LLC, pleading guilty to one count of violating the anti-bribery

    provisionsof the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of as amended, pursuant toa plea agreementwiththe DOJ (the "PleaAgreement");

    (2) the government and Alcoa World Alumina LLC agreeing to

    recommend to the Court a of $209,000,000, payable in equal annualinstallmentsof $41,800,000 byAlcoa World Alumina LLC as appropriate under

    the circumstances; andAlcoaWorldAluminaLLC agreeing to pay to theUnited

    Statesanadministrative,non-refundableforfeiture amount of $14,000,000;

    (3) the Court retaining the ability to accept or the terms of thePlea Agreement under Fed. R.Crim.P.

    (4) impositionof certain commitments set out in the Plea Agreement

    on the Company and onAlcoa World Alumina LLC, including the Company's

    guaranteeto theUnited Statesof the payment byAlcoa World Alumina LLC of

    the fine and forfeiture amount to be imposed onAlcoa WorldAlumina LLC under the Plea Agreement and the continued implementation and

    maintenance of ananti-corruption compliance program as specified by the Plea

    Agreement;

    (5) the Company agreeing to include in any agreement for the sale,

    merger or transfer ofall or substantially all ofitsbusinessoperations as they exist

    on thedateof the Plea Agreement the requirement that thesuccessoror purchaser

    company abide by the commitments set out inclauses(2) and (4) above; and

    (6) The Company agreeing to (a) aknowingwaiver of its rights to a

    speedy trialpursuant to the SixthAmendment to theUnited StatesConstitution,

    Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161, and Federal Rule of Criminal

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    29/52

    Procedure 48(b); (b) aknowingwaiver forpurposesof the Plea Agreement and

    any charges by the United States arising out of the conduct described in the

    Statement ofFacts attached to the Plea Agreement or criminal Information any

    objectionwithrespect to venue in theUnitedStatesDistrictCourt for the Western

    Districtof Pennsylvania; and (c) aknowingwaiver of anydefenses basedon the

    statute oflimitationsfor any prosecution relating to the conduct described in theStatement of Facts, criminalInformation,orrelatingto conductknownto the DOJ

    priorto thedateonwhichthe Plea Agreement was signed that is not time-barred

    by the applicable statute of limitations on the date of the signing of the Plea

    Agreement.

    NOW, TH ER EF OR E, BE IT:

    R E S O L V E D , that the Board ofDirectorsof the Company, after thorough

    consideration ofallrelevantissues,includingconsidering thecostsand benefits of

    settlement, and considering the advice and conclusions of outside legal counsel

    and management, and upon the recommendation of the Special Committee

    comprisingthe Senior Advisors to the Board,deemsit advisable and in thebest

    interests of the Company and its relevant constituencies for the Board ofDirectors

    to approve the key terms ofthe Proposed Settlement that have been reviewedwith

    the Board at this meeting, and such key terms of the Proposed Settlement be and

    they hereby are approved substantially as presented at this meeting; and

    F U R T H E R R E S O L V E D , that the proper officers of the Company and

    counsel for the Company are each hereby authorized and directed to take such

    actions as are necessary to effect the Proposed Settlement, including the

    guaranteesof the Company to the United States,and to execute and deliver all

    agreements, instruments and documents and to take such other and further actions

    whichin theopinionof any ofthemmay benecessaryor desirable to achieve thepurposesof or to consummate the Proposed Settlement and the resolution of the

    investigation of past payments and practices by Alcoa World AluminaLLC

    referenced in the Plea Agreement, including appearing before the UnitedStates

    District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania at the time the Plea

    Agreement is accepted by the Court to confirm the Company's undertakings

    pursuant to the Plea Agreement, the taking of any such action or the execution

    and delivery of any such agreements, instruments or documents to be conclusive

    evidence ofthe authority to take, execute or deliver thesame.

    I further certify that the aforesaid resolutions have not been amended or revoked in any

    respect and remain infull force and effect on thedate certification.IN WITNESS WH E R E O F ,I have executed this Certificate on January 6th, 2014.

    BrendaA .Hart

    Assistant Secretary

    AlcoaInc.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    30/52

    Signedbeforemethis dayofJanuary, 2014.Notary Publicinand for the StateofNew York

    Notary Public,StateofNew YorkNo. 02LA6245285

    Qualified inNew YorkCountyExpires July

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    31/52

    EXff lBIT 3

    STATEMENT OF FACTS

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    32/52

    E X H IB IT3

    STATEMENT OF FACTS

    Thefollowing Statement ofFactsis incorporated by reference as partofthe Plea

    Agreement (the "Agreement") between theUnitedStatesDepartment o f Justice, Criminal

    Division,Fraud Section (the "Department") and the Defendant,ALCOAWORLD ALUMINA

    LLC. ALCOAWORLDALUMINALLCherebyagreesand stipulates that the following

    information,to the extent itrelatesto its actions and the actions ofitsofficers and employees, is

    true and accurate. ALCOAWORLDALUMINALLCdoesnot admit to the conduct of any

    other entity or person, andreferencesto such conduct are for backgroundpurposesonly.

    ALCOAWORLDALUMINALLCadmits,accepts,and acknowledges that it is responsible for

    theactsofitsofficers or employees, as setforthbelow. ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC

    furtheragreesthat itwil lneither contest theadmissibilityof, nor contradict, this Statement of

    Factswithrespectto its actions or the actions ofitsofficers or employees in any prosecution ofit

    arisingfroma breachof

    the Agreement.

    I f thismatter were to proceed totrial,the Department has represented that itwouldprove

    beyond areasonabledoubt, by admissible evidence, the facts alleged below, and that this

    evidencewouldestablish the following:

    Relevant Entities and Individuals

    TheDefendant

    Defendant A L C O A W O R L D ALUMINA L L Cwas aLimited Liability

    Company formed under Delaware lawwhichmaintained itsprincipalplace ofbusinessin

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in the WesternDistrictof Pennsylvania. ALCOAWORLD

    ALUMINALLCowned and operated (eitherdirectlyorindirectly)bauxiteminingand alumina

    1

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    33/52

    refiningassetsinNorthAmerica,Europe, SouthAmerica,Africaand the Caribbean. ALCOA

    WORLDALUMINALLCwas a "domestic concern"withinthe meaning of the FCPA,TitleUnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-2(a).

    Relevant Alcoa Entities

    2. AlcoaInc.("Alcoa")was acorporationorganized under the laws of the

    Commonwealth ofPennsylvania. Until2006, Alcoa'sprincipalplace ofbusinesswas in

    Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,i nthe WesternDistrictofPennsylvania. In 2006,Alcoamoved its

    principalplace ofbusinessto NewYork,NewYork. Alcoaissued and maintained aclasso f

    publiclytraded securities registered pursuant to Section

    ofthe Securities Exchange Act of

    whichwere traded on the NewYorkStock Exchange. Alcoawas therefore an"issuer"

    withinthe meaning FCPA,Title 15,UnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-l(a).Alcoawas aglobalproviderofprimaryaluminiumand fabricatedaluminium.

    Alcoawasalsoaglobalprovider of smeltergradealumina, the rawmaterialthat is supplied to

    smelters to produce aluminium. Alcoarefined aluminafrombauxite it extractedfromits global

    miningoperations. Alcoaoperatedworldwidethrough subsidiaries andaffiliated entities in

    NorthAmerica,Asia,Australia,Europe, SouthAmerica,Africaand the Caribbean.

    4. AlcoaWorldAluminaandChemicals("AWAC")was an unincorporated global

    bauxiteminingand aluminarefiningenterprise formed in betweenAlcoaandAluminaLimited ("Alumina"),themajority andminorityowners ofAWAC,respectively. AWAC

    conducted its operations by and through the coordinatedactivityof severalaffiliated enterprise

    companies,witheachenterprise company being owned byAlcoaandAluminainproportionto

    theirrespective ownership interests in theAWACenterprise. Inmatters of strategy andpolicy,

    theAWACenterprise companies receiveddirectionand counselfroma "StrategicCouncil"that

    2

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    34/52

    was chaired byAlcoa. AWACwas a "domestic concern"withinthe meaningofthe FCPA,Title

    UnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-2(a).

    Defendant WORLDALUMINALLCwas anAWAC enterprisecompany. Beginning in or around 2000, executives atALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC's

    offices in Pittsburgh andKnoxville,Tennessee,assumedprimary responsibility for all of

    relationships withglobal alumina customers, includingAluminiumBahrain B.S.C.

    ("Alba"),a state-owned and state-controlled aluminiumsmelter in Bahrain. ALCOAWORLD

    ALUMINALLCpersonnel responsible forthesefunctions reportedindirectlytoAlcoapersonnel

    inNewYork.

    6. Alcoa ofAustralia Limited("Alcoa ofAustralia")was theAWAC enterprise

    company that owned and operatedAWAC'sbauxiteminingand aluminarefiningassetsin

    Australia. Alcoa of Australia'sprincipalplace ofbusinesswas in Melbourne,Australia,until

    and was thereafter in Perth,Australia. Alcoa ofAustraliaowned and operated mines in

    WesternAustraliathat extracted bauxite,whichAlcoa ofAustraliathenprocessedinto smelter

    gradealumina in refineries it owned and operated. Alcoa ofAustraliasold the smeltergrade

    aluminatoaluminiumsmelters it owned in thestateofVictoria,Australia, aswellas to

    customersand aluminatradersaround theworld.

    RelevantALCOA WORLDALUMINA LLC Individual

    7. Executive Aheld a seniorsalesand marketing position atALCOA WORLD

    ALUMINALLC in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, starting in or around 2000, when he took over

    responsibilityfor the relationshipwithAlba.

    TheIntermediaryandRelatedEntities

    3

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    35/52

    8. Consultant Awas an international middleman who resided in London and was a

    citizenofCanada,Jordan, and the UnitedKingdom. Consultant A hadclosecontactswith

    certainmembersof Bahrain's RoyalFamily,someofwhomwere senior officials in the

    Government of Bahrain. Consultant A metwithALCOAWORLDALUMINALLC executives

    inLondon, NewYork,andelsewheretodiscussmattersrelating to the alumina supply

    relationshipwithAlba.

    9. Limited was a shell entity controlled by Consultant A andincorporated in theBritishVirgin Islands,withits purportedplacesofbusinessin Australia,

    Guernsey,and Switzerland. Alumet had no legitimatebusinessoperations and no history in the

    aluminabusiness. Alumet held banlcaccountsat the Royal Bank ofCanada("RBC") in

    Switzerland and the Channel Islands.

    AA Alumina and ChemicalsLtd. ("AAAC")was a shell entity controlled by

    Consultant A and incorporated in theBritishVirginIslands,withits purportedplacesofbusiness

    inAustralia,Guernsey,and Switzerland. AAAChad no legitimatebusinessoperations and no

    history in the aluminabusiness. AAACheld bankaccountsat RBC in Switzerland and the

    Channel Islands.

    Consultant A held an account at RBCGuernseyin thenameofUnited Legal

    Engineering Co.("ULECO"),a shell entity, that contained funds from, among othersources,the

    purportedsalesof alumina toAlbaby Alumet andAAACon behalf ofAlcoaofAustralia,as

    explained more fully in theparagraphsalleged below. Consultant Asometimesuseda ULECO

    bank account to wire money directly orindirectlytoaccountsbeneficially owned by officials of

    the Kingdom of Bahrain.

    4

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    36/52

    Consultant Aalsomaintained a bankaccountat HSBC in Luxembourgunderthe

    nameofanothershell company, La Consultant A would wire money toOfficial Cthrough thataccountfromULECO'saccountat RBCGuernsey.

    RelevantEntities and Foreign Officials in Bahrain

    13. AluminiumBahrain B.S.C. ("Alba") was an aluminiumsmelteroperating in

    Bahrain. Thestateholding company of the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Mumtalakat, which was

    controlled by the MinistryofFinance, held 77percentofthe sharesofAlba. The Saudi Basic

    Industries Corporation("SABIC"),which was and controlled by the governmentofthe Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, held a 20percentminoritystakeinAlba,andthreepercentof

    Alba'sshareswere held by a German investment group. The ofprofitsearnedby Albabelonged to the Mumtalakat, though partoftheprofitwas permitted to beusedby Alba for its

    operations. TheMinistryofFinancehad toapproveanychangein Alba's capital structure and

    had to be consulted on any major capital projects orcontractsmaterial to Alba's operations.

    Members Royal Family of Bahrain andrepresentativesof the government sat on the BoardofDirectors ofAlba,controlled its Board, and had primary authority in selecting its chief

    executive officer and chief financial officer. Accordingly,Alba was an"agency"and

    "instrumentality" o f the Government of Bahrain and Alba's directors, officers andemployees

    were "foreign officials"withinthe meaning ofthe FCPA,Title UnitedSatesCode, Section78dd-2(h)(2)(A).

    14. OfficialA was amemberof Royal Family andservedas amemberofthe board of directors ofAlbafrom 1982 to 1997. From 1988 to 1990,OfficialA wasalsoa

    memberofAlba'stendercommittee, which wasresponsiblein part for awarding contractsto Alba's suppliers, suchas Alcoa entities supplying alumina to Alba. As an officer ofAlba,

    5

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    37/52

    OfficialA was a "foreignofficial" withinthe meaningofthe FCPA,Title UnitedStatesCode, Section78dd-2(h)(2)(A).

    OfficialB served on Alba's boardfrom atleast1986 to 2000 as a representative

    of SABIC. From 1988 to 1990,OfficialBalsoserved on Alba'stendercommittee with Official

    A. As anofficer ofAlba,OfficialB was a "foreignofficial" withinthe meaningofthe FCPA,

    Title UnitedStatesCode, Section78dd-2(h)(2)(A).16. OfficialC was a senior member of Bahrain's RoyalFamily,a senior government

    official ofBahrainfrom atleast1995 to 2005, and served as ahigh-rankingofficer ofAlba from

    to 2005. As ahigh-rankingofficer ofAlba,OfficialC was extremelyinfluentialover the

    assignment of contracts to Alba's suppliers. Official C relied on Consultant A toassisthimin

    opening international bankaccountsusing variousaliasesor shell entities for thepurposeof

    receivingcorrupt funds fromkickbacksfromAlba's suppliers. As anofficer ofAlbaand a

    senior governmentofficial, Official C was a "foreignofficial" withinthe meaning FCPA,Title UnitedStatesCode, Section78dd-2(h)(2)(A).

    THE CORRUPTION SCHEMEIN BAHRAIN

    Background

    17. From 1989 to approximately 1996,AlcoaofAustraliamanaged its long term

    supplyrelationshipwithAlba. As partofthatrelationship,AlcoaofAustraliaretained

    Consultant A toassistin long-term contract negotiationswithAlbaandBahrainigovernment

    officials. By 2000, whenALCOAWORLDALUMINALLCassumeddirect oversightofthe

    Albarelationship,Consultant A was playing a significant role in the relationship betweenAlcoa

    ofAustraliaandAlba. Executive A, who inherited theAlbaoversight relationship as partofhis

    6

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    38/52

    duties atALCOAWORLDALUMINALLC,becamethe primary liaisonwithConsultant A

    regarding theAlbarelationship.

    Overview

    In or around 2002,ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC,through Executive A,

    causedAlcoa ofAustraliatoenterinto a purported distributorship for thesaleof approximately

    onemilliontonsof alumina annually toAlbathrough Consultant A's shell companies, Alumet

    and AAAC.

    In or around 2004,ALCOAWORLDALUMIN A LLC,through Executive A,

    coordinated anotherpurported distributionagreementthat involvedthesaleof up to 1.78 million

    tonsof alumina toAlbaeveryyearthrough Alumet andAAAC. This corruptarrangementlasted

    through on or about December 2009.20. As partofthe 2002 and 2004 purported distributorshipagreements,Consultant A

    imposed a mark-up on andAAAC'spurportedsalesof alumina toAlbaandusedthemark-up fromthosesalesto enrich himself and pay bribes to senior government officials of

    Bahrain. ALCOAWORLDALUMIN A LLC,through Executive A, consciously disregarded the

    fact that Consultant A would pay bribes to senior government officials fromthe mark-up on

    aluminasalestoAlba.

    /. ALCOA WORLDAL LLC, throughExecutive A, EnlargedConsultantA's Role in the AluminaSupplyRelationship

    By 2000, Executive A, who was thenbasedin WORLD ALUMINALLC'soffices in Pittsburgh, hadassumeddirect responsibility for managing theAlba

    relationship.

    7

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    39/52

    22. FromAprilto December 2001,Executive A took aseriesofstepstocauseAlumet

    andAAACtobecomeAlcoa of Australia's purported distributors for all ofitssalesof alumina to

    Alba.

    23. On or aboutApril 12, Executive A wrote toOfficial C to advise him that"Alcoawishes" to extend the"presentsupply contract [withAlba]forthreeyearsto December

    24. On or around August after receiving arequestfromAlbato continue theexistingsupplyarrangementsthrough December 2003, Executive A facilitated Alba's entering

    intoan extensionofthe existing alumina supply arrangement through December 2003.

    25. On or about February 2002, Executive AcausedAlcoa ofAustraliatoenterintoa purporteddistributionagreementwithAlumetandAAACfor the supply of approximately

    onemilliontons of alumina intended forsaletoAlba.

    26. Executive A knew that Alcoa ofAustraliawouldcontinue to ship alumina directly

    toAlba. Executive A consciously disregarded the fact that the purported contractual

    arrangement he craftedwithConsultant AwouldpermitAlumetand/or AAACto mark-upsales

    toAlbaof aluminafromAlcoa ofAustralia. In or around February 2002, Alcoa ofAustralia

    ceasedto invoiceAlbadirectly for shipments o f alumina.

    TheMark-Up and CommissionPaymentsFrom2002Through2004

    27. From 2002 to 2004, Executive A, acting on behalf ofALCOA WORLD

    ALUMINA LLC,causedAAACto receive inexcessof $79millionin mark-ups on alumina

    salestoAlba.

    28. AAACalsoreceived a commission under the terms of the 2002distribution

    agreement. The purported 2002distributionagreementprovided for a commission of of

    8

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    40/52

    allpaymentsmadebyAAACtoAlcoaofAustraliafor alumina. From 2002 to 2004,Alcoaof

    AustraliapaidAAACa commission of $493,509.

    ConsultantAChanneled CorruptPaymentsto Government Officials

    From2002through2004

    29. From 2002 through 2004, Consultant Amadecorrupt payments toOfficialsB and

    Cfrombankaccountsat RBC in Guernsey heldinthenameofAlumetandULECO.

    II. Executive A Retained ConsultantA For

    Joint VentureNegotiations betweenAlcoa andAlba

    30. In 2002,Alcoawas attempting to negotiate ajointventurewithAlba,inwhich

    AlcoawouldsupplyAlbawithaluminafromtheAWACsystem'ssmelters, and, inexchange,

    AlbawouldsupplyAlcoawithaluminium. Executive A participated in the negotiations for

    Alcoaand retained Consultant A toprivatelylobbyOfficial C on behalf of Alcoa'sposition. On

    oraboutApril27, 2002, Executive AcausedAlcoatoentera consultingagreementwith

    Consultant A pursuant towhichConsultant Awouldreceive an $8million"successfee"based

    onlimitedspecified negotiation "advice andassistancetoAlcoa" i fthejointventure were

    successful.

    As part of the negotiations, Executive A proposedajointventure structure that

    contemplated supplying alumina toAlbathrough adistributor.

    32. On or about March 26, 2003, an in-house attorney in Alcoa's legal department

    sentan email asking Executive A toexplainthe role of thedistributor. On or aboutMarch27,

    2003, Executive A responded that"[t]heDistributorshiprol[e]is something the Bahrain

    Government wants" and thatAlcoa"shouldn't get tooinvolvedwithhow theDistributorand the

    Government interact. We are currentlysellingthe alumna we supply toAlbathrough a

    9

    \

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    41/52

    Distributor." Inresponse,the in-house attorney wrote that "wewi l lneedto understand the

    Distributor's role completely . . . for Foreign Corrupt Practice Actpurposes."

    OnSeptember 2003, Alcoa andAlbaagreedto a Memorandum ofUnderstanding ("MOU") outliningan equity investment by Alcoa inAlbaandprovidingfor

    alumina to be sold to the Government of Bahrain, as majorityshareholderofAlba,"directly or

    through anassociatedcompany ofAlcoasatisfactory to GoB [Government of Bahrain] and

    Alcoa." TheMOUwas approved byOfficial C on behalfofAlba. However, thejointventure

    negotiations fellthrough, and Consultant A wasneverpaid the $8millionsuccessfee.

    34. Within 17daysofthe signingoftheMOU,Consultant A transferred $2millionto

    Official C's account atDeutscheBank inGeneva,Switzerland,from aULECObank account at

    RBCinGuernsey.

    III. ALCOA WORLDALUMINA LLC, Through Executive A, Alcoa ofAustraliato Secure a2005Long-Term AluminaSupplyDealwithAlba

    By the summer of2004,Alcoa ofAustraliawas supplying approximately one

    millionmetrictonsof alumina annually toAlba,but wasinvoicing Alba indirectlythrough

    Consultant A's companies. Alba's obligationsunderpre-existing supply arrangementswith

    AlcoaofAustraliawere set to expire at the end of 2004.

    36. In the summer of 2004, Executive A and one ofhis supervisors, anothersenior

    member ofALCOAWORLDALUMINALLC's global aluminasalesdepartment, sought to

    securea new long term alumina supplyagreementwithAlba. On or around August 5, 2004,

    Executive A and his supervisor were advised by a former senior Alcoa executive who had a

    relationshipwithConsultant A that i f they attempted to negotiate a direct contractual relationship

    between Alcoa ofAustraliaandAlba,rather than negotiate a supplyarrangementthrough

    10

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    42/52

    Consultant A and one ofhis companies, someor all ofAlba'sbusinesscould be lost to another

    aluminasupplier.

    On or about August 2004, Executive A and his supervisor metwithConsultant A at Consultant A's LondonOffice todiscussusing Consultant A's companies "as

    Alcoa's exclusive distributorinthe region."

    On or about August 22, 2004, Executive Asentan email to his supervisor

    documentingwithmore specificity certain items that werediscussedat the meeting. Among

    them, Executive A noted that"[w]e agreedto supply [ConsultantA] withpricingindications for

    supply to [AAAC]by 8/24 so he canhavethesefor his meeting [inBahrain]with [OfficialC].

    We mentionedpricingclose to 14%." Executive A's emailalsonoted that"[Official C] is

    holdingon to publishing[Alba's]aluminatender[to the market]untilhe has further discussions

    with [ConsultantA ]on 8/29." Thepricingterms per metric ton of alumina that Executive A

    quoted to Consultant A at the meeting in London werelessthan thepricingterms forAlbathat

    Executive A had quoted toOfficial C approximately one month earlier.

    On or aroundSeptember29, 2004, Executive A facilitated s tendering abidto supplyAlbaup to milliontons of alumina for tenyearscommencing in 2005.

    40. On or about October 8, 2004, Attorney 1, the in-house attorney responsible for

    supporting the aluminabusiness, suggestedterminating the consultingagreementthat Alcoa had

    entered withConsultantA,as "the terms of [ConsultantA's] currentengagementcreated a lot of

    anxiety in the organization." Executive A advised that the consultancyagreementshould not be

    terminateduntilAlcoa hadsecureda new long-term alumina supplyagreementwithAlba.

    On or about Official CcausedAlbatoaccept stenderofferfor aten-yearsupply of alumina.

    11

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    43/52

    42. On or about December 2004, Executive AcausedAlcoaofAustraliatoenterapurportedten-yeardistributorshipagreementwithAlumetandAAAC to purportedly supply

    themwithup to milliontonsof alumina forsaletoAlbafrom2005to 2014. From2005to2009, the price term was 13.9% ofLMEminus$0.25per ton of alumina. From 2010 to 2014,

    the pricedecreasedto ofLMEminus$0.25per ton of alumina. Executive A consciouslydisregarded the fact that Alcoa ofAustraliawould continue to supply alumina directly toAlba

    that was purportedly being "distributed" through Alumet and AAAC.

    On or about March 4, 2005, arepresentativeof Consultant Asentthe CEO of

    Albaafinal,unexecuted contract for the purported supplyagreementbetween AAACandAlba.

    44. On or aboutJune8, 2005, the finalagreementnegotiated between AAAC and

    Albawas signed by Alba's CEO on behalfofAlba. Theagreement'seffectivedatewasJanuary

    1,2005, and its term was through December 2014. Theagreementprovided that AAACwouldsupplyAlbawith 1.508 millionmetrictonsof alumina in 2005, and 1.6 millionmetric

    tonsof alumina thereafter foreachremaining contractyear. From2005to 2009, the price

    formula in theagreementresulted in anaverageprice toAlbaof 14.98% ofLMEper metric ton

    ofalumina. From through the price formula in theagreementresulted in anaverageprice toAlbaof 14.42 % ofLMEper metric ton of alumina. Albawas required tobearthecost

    ofshipping and insurance.

    ConsultantA's Mark-up on Alumina Sales From2005to2009

    As a result ofALCOAWORLDALUMINA

    s conduct, through Executive

    A, from2005through 2009, Alumet andAAACreceived inexcessof $188millionon theup of aluminasalestoAlba. This money was transferred from the initialaccountsinwhich

    12

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    44/52

    paymentfromAlbawas received through various bank accounts controlledby Consultant A,

    includingaccounts in thenameofshellentitiesAlumetandULECOat RBC in Guernsey.

    Additional CorruptPaymentsto Official C

    46. From 2005 through 2006, Consultant Amademillionsin corrupt payments from

    the account ofULECOat RBC in Guernsey through the account ofLaFoscainLuxembourgto

    accounts that were beneficially owned byOfficialC under clientcodenamesatABN AMRO

    BankinLuxembourgandLGTBank in Liechtenstein.

    47. Underthesecircumstances, ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC,through

    Executive A, consciously disregarded the fact that the mark-up imposed by Consultant A on

    AlumetandAAAC'ssalesofaluminatoAlbawas facilitatingcorrupt payments to government

    whocontrolledAlba's tenderprocess.

    IV. ALCOA WORLDALUMINALLC Caused Alcoa to ExtendMaterially

    Significant LinesofCredit to ConsultantA

    48. Consultant A sought alineofcreditfromAlcoato cover the cost ofalumina

    shipments toAlbauntilAlbaremitted payment toAlumetandAAAC. ConsultantA,however,

    refused to provide financialstatementsforAlumetorAAAC to Alcoa's credit department, which

    wasnormallyrequired for a significant extension ofcreditto athird-party. Notwithstandingthis,

    inor around December 2004,ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC,through ExecutiveA, sought

    and received approval to extend credit to Consultant A's companies and therebycausedAlcoa's

    creditdepartment to extend a $23millionlineofcredittoAlumetandAAAC.

    49. Thereafter, ineachof contractyears2005 through 2009,Alcoacontinued to grant

    businessunitoverrides to extendmateriallyincreasing credit lines to Consultant A's purported

    distributorships. By 2007,Alcoawas extending a creditlineof$58milliontoAlumetand

    13

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    45/52

    AAAC. During this period, Alcoa granted Alumet andAAAC credit lines that were significantly

    greaterthanthosegranted by Alcoa to any other third-party.

    50. Byfacilitatingthe extension of credit to ConsultantA,Executive A enabled the

    purported distributorshipschemebyallowingConsultant A to defer paying Alcoa ofAustralia

    forthemulti-milliondollar shipments of alumina toAlbauntilAlumet andAAAC received

    payment from Alba.

    14

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    46/52

    E X H I B I T 4

    CO RPO RATE CO MPLIANCE PRO G R AM

    Inorder toaddressany deficiencies in its internal controls, compliance code, policies,

    and procedures regarding compliancewiththe Foreign Corrupt Practices ActU.S.C.78dd-l, and other applicableanti-corruptionlaws,AFCOA INC. (the"Company")agreesto continue to conduct, in a manner consistent with all ofits obligations

    under this Agreement, appropriate reviews ofits existing internal controls, policies, and

    procedures.

    Wherenecessaryand appropriate, the Companyagreesto adopt new or to modify

    existinginternal controls, compliance code, policies, and procedures in order toensurethat it

    maintains: (a) a system ofinternalaccounting controls designed toensurethat the Company

    makesandkeepsfairandaccuratebooks, records, and accounts; and (b) a rigorousanti-

    corruptioncompliance program that includes policies and procedures designed to detect and

    deter violationsofthe FCPA and other applicableanti-corruptionlaws. At aminimum,this

    should include, but not belimitedto, thefollowingelements to the extent they are notaheady

    partof the Company's existing internal controls, compliance code, policies, and procedures:

    Commitment

    The Companywil lensurethat its directors and senior management provide

    strong,explicit,andvisiblesupport and commitment to its corporatepolicyagainstviolationsof

    theanti-corruptionlaws and its compliance code.

    Policies and Procedures

    2. The Company wil ldevelop and promulgate a clearly articulated and visible

    corporate policyagainstviolationsofthe FCPA and other applicable foreign law counterparts

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    47/52

    (collectively,the"anti-corruption laws,"),which policyshall bememorializedin awritten

    compliance code.

    The Companywil ldevelop and promulgate compliance policies and procedures

    designed to reduce the prospect ofviolations anti-corruptionlaws and the Company'scompliance code, and the Companywi l ltake appropriatemeasurestoencourageand support the

    observanceof ethics and compliance policies and procedures againstviolation anti-corruptionlaws by personnel ata ll levelsofthe Company. Theseanti-corruptionpoliciesand

    procedures shall apply to all directors, and employees and, wherenecessaryandappropriate, outside parties acting on behalfof the Company in aforeignjurisdiction,including

    but notlimited to, agentsand intermediaries, consultants, representatives, distributors,teaming

    partners, contractors and suppliers, consortia, andjointventure partners(collectively,"agents

    andbusinesspartners"). The Company shallnotify allemployees that compliancewiththe

    policiesand procedures is the duty ofindividualsata ll levelso f the company. Suchpoliciesand

    procedures shalladdress:

    a. gifts;

    b. hospitality,entertainment, andexpenses;

    c. customer travel;

    d. politicalcontributions;

    e. charitable donations and sponsorships;

    f. facilitationpayments; and

    g. solicitationandextortion.

    4. The Companywil l ensurethat it has a system offinancialand accounting

    procedures, includinga system ofinternalcontrols, reasonably designed toensurethe

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    48/52

    maintenanceoffair andaccuratebooks, records, andaccounts. This system should be designed

    to providereasonableassurancesthat:

    a. transactionsare executed inaccordancewithmanagement'sgeneral or

    specific authorization;

    b. transactionsare recorded asnecessaryto permit preparation of financial

    in conformitywithgenerallyacceptedaccounting principles or any other criteria

    applicable to suchstatements,and to maintain accountability forassets;

    c. accesstoassetsis permitted only inaccordancewithmanagement's

    general or specific authorization; and

    d. the recorded accountability forassetsis compared withthe existingassets

    atreasonableintervals and appropriate action is takenwithrespectto any differences.

    Periodic Risk-Based Review

    5. The Company wi l l developthesecompliance policies andprocedureson the

    basisof a periodic riskassessmentaddressingthe individualcircumstances Company, inparticular the foreign bribery risks facing the Company,including,but notlimitedto, its

    geographical organization, interactionswithvarioustypesand levels of government officials,

    industrialsectorsof operation, involvementinjointventure arrangements, importance oflicenses

    and permits inthe Company's operations, degreeof governmental oversight and inspection, and

    volume and importance ofgoodsand personnel clearing throughcustomsand immigration.

    6. The Company shall review its anti-corruption compliance policies and

    proceduresnolessthan annually andupdatethem as appropriate toensuretheir continued

    effectiveness, taking into account relevant developments in thefieldand evolving international

    and industrystandards.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    49/52

    Proper Oversight andIndependence

    7. The Company will assignresponsibilityto one or more senior corporate

    executives of the Company for the implementation and oversightofthe Company's anti-

    corruptioncompliance code, policies, and procedures. Such corporate shallhavetheauthorityto reportdirectlyto independent monitoringbodies,includinginternal audit, the

    Company's Board ofDirectors,or any appropriate committee of the Board ofDirectors,and

    shallhaveanadequatelevelof autonomyfrommanagement aswellas sufficientresourcesand

    authorityto maintain such autonomy.

    Training andGuidance

    8. The Companywil limplement mechanisms designed toensurethat itsanti-

    corruptioncompliance code, policies, and procedures are effectively communicated to all

    directors, officers, employees, and, wherenecessaryand appropriate,agentsandbusiness

    partners. Thesemechanisms shallinclude:(a) periodictrainingfor all directors and officers, all

    employees in positions of leadership or trust, positions that require suchtraining(e.g., internal

    audit,sales,legal, compliance, finance), or positions that otherwiseposeacorruptionriskto the

    Company, and, wherenecessaryand appropriate,agentsandbusinesspartners; and (b)

    corresponding certifications by all such directors, officers, employees,agents,andbusiness

    partners, certifying compliancewiththetraining requirements.

    9. The Companywil lmaintain,or wherenecessaryestablish, an effective system

    for providingguidance and advice to directors, officers, employees, and, wherenecessaryand

    appropriate,agentsandbusinesspartners, oncomplyingwiththe Company's anti-corruption

    compliance code, policies, and procedures, includingwhen they need advice on an urgentbasis

    or in anyforeignjurisdictioninwhichthe Companyoperates.

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    50/52

    Internal Reporting and Investigation

    The Companywillmaintain,or wherenecessaryestablish, an effective system

    for internal and, where possible, confidential reporting by, and protection of, directors, officers,

    employees, and, where appropriate,agentsandbusinesspartners concerningviolationsanti-corruptionlaws or the Company'santi-corruptioncompliance code, policies, and

    procedures.

    The Companywillmaintain,or wherenecessaryestablish, an effective and

    reliableprocesswithsufficientresourcesfor responding to, investigating, and documenting

    allegations ofviolationsof theanti-corruptionlaws or the Company's anti-corruption

    compliance code, policies, and procedures.

    Enforcement and Discipline

    The Company willimplement mechanisms designed to effectively enforce its

    compliance code, policies, and procedures, includingappropriately compliance anddiscipliningviolations.

    The Companywillinstitute appropriate disciplinaryprocedures toaddress,

    among other things,violationsoftheanti-corruptionlaws and the Company's anti-corruption

    compliance code, policies, and procedures by the Company's directors, officers, and employees.

    Such procedures should be applied consistently andfairly, regardlesso f thepositionheld by, or

    perceived importance of, the director,officer,or employee. The Company shall implement

    procedures toensurethat where misconduct is discovered,reasonablestepsare taken to remedy

    the harm resultingfromsuch misconduct, and toensurethat appropriatestepsare taken to

    prevent furthersimilarmisconduct, includingassessingthe internal controls, compliance code,

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    51/52

    policies,and procedures andmaking modificationsnecessarytoensuretheoverallanti-

    corruptioncompliance program is effective.

    Third-PartyRelationships

    14. The Companywil l instituteappropriate risk-based due diligence and compliance

    requirements pertaining to the retention and oversight ofall agentsandbusinesspartners,

    including:

    a. properly documented duediligence pertainingto thehiringand

    appropriate and regular oversight ofagentsandbusinesspartners;

    b. informingagentsandbusinesspartners of the Company'scommitmentto

    abidingbyanti-corruptionlaws, ando fthe Company'santi-corruptioncompliance code,

    policies,and procedures; and

    c. seeking areciprocalcommitmentfromagentsandbusinesspartners.

    Wherenecessaryand appropriate, the Companywil l include standard provisions

    inagreements, contracts, and renewals thereofwith allagentsandbusinesspartners that are

    reasonably calculated to preventviolationsof theanti-corruptionlaws,whichmay, depending

    uponthe circumstances, include: (a)anti-corruptionrepresentations and undertakingsrelatingto

    compliancewiththeanti-corruptionlaws;(b) rights to conduct audits of the books and records of

    the agent orbusinesspartner toensurecompliancewiththe foregoing; and (c) rights to terminate

    an agent orbusinesspartner as a result of any breach oftheanti-corruptionlaws, the Company's

    compliance code,policies,or procedures, or the representations and undertakings related to such

    matters.

    Mergers and Acquisitions

  • 7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)

    52/52

    The Companywil ldevelop and implement policies and procedures for mergers

    and acquisitionsrequiringthat the Company conduct appropriate risk-based due diligence on

    potentialnewbusinessentities,includingappropriate FCPA andanti-corruptiondue diligence by

    legal,accounting, and compliance personnel.

    The Companywil lensurethat the Company's compliance code, policies, and

    procedures regarding theanti-corruptionlaws apply asquicklyas is practicable to newly

    acquiredbusinessesor entities mergedwiththe Company andwil lpromptly:

    a. trainthe directors, officers, employees,agents,andbusinesspartners

    consistentwithParagraph 8 above on theanti-corruptionlaws and the Company's compliance

    code, policies, and procedures regardinganti-corruptionlaws; and

    b. where warranted, conduct an audit ofallnewly acquiredormergedbusinessesasquicklyas practicable.

    Monitoring and Testing

    The Companywil l conduct periodic reviews and testing ofitsanti-corruption

    compliance code, policies, and procedures designed to evaluate and improve their effectiveness

    inpreventing and detectingviolationsofanti-corruptionlaws and the Company'santi-corruption

    compliance code, policies, and procedures, taking into account relevant developments inthe field

    andevolvinginternational and industrystandards.