u.s. v. alcoa world alumina (plea agreement)
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
1/52
UNITED STATESDISTRICTCOURT THEWESTERN DISTRICTOFPENNSYLVANIA
UNITEDSTATES OFAMERICACRIMINALNO.
v.
ALCOAWORLD ALUMINA LLC,
Defendant.
Count FCPAAnti-BriberyProvision,
15 U.S.C. 78dd-2 18 U.S.C. 2
P L E A A G R E E ME N T
TheUnitedStatesofAmerica,by and through the Fraud SectionoftheCriminalDivision
oftheUnitedStatesDepartment of Justice and theUnitedStatesAttorney'sOfficefor the
Districtof Pennsylvania (the"UnitedStates"or the "Department"), and the defendant,
AlcoaWorldAluminaLLC(the "Defendant"), by and through its undersigned attorneys, and
throughits authorized representative, pursuant to authority granted by Defendant's Board of
Member Representatives, hereby submit and enter into this plea agreement (the "Agreement"),
pursuant to Rule ofthe Federal Rules ofCriminalProcedure. The terms andconditionsofthisAgreement are asfollows:
Pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. the Defendant agreesto waive itsrighttograndjuryindictment and itsrightto challenge venue in theDistrictCourt for the Western
Districto f Pennsylvania, and to pleadguiltyto a one-countInformationcharging the Defendant
withone count ofviolatingthe anti-bribery provisionsofthe Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of
("FCPA"),as amended, Title UnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-2, andTitle United
TheDefendant's Agreement
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
2/52
StatesCode, Section2. Uponacceptanceby the Courtof thisAgreement, the Defendant further
agreesto persist in that plea through sentencing and, as setforthbelow, to cooperate fully with
the Department in its investigation intoallmatters related to the conduct charged in the
Information.
2. The Defendantunderstandsandagreesthat this Agreement is between the
Department and the Defendant anddoesnotbindany otherdivisionor sectionofthe Department
ofJustice or any other federal,state,orlocalprosecuting, administrative, or regulatory authority.
Nevertheless, the Department willbringthis Agreement and the cooperationofthe Defendant, its
director indirect affiliates, subsidiaries, andmajority shareholder to the attention of other
prosecuting authorities or otheragencies,i frequested by the Defendant.
The Defendantagreesthat this Agreementwil lbe executed by an authorized
corporate representative. The Defendant furtheragreesthat a resolutiondulyadopted by the
Defendant's Board of Member Representatives, attached to this Agreement asExhibit 1, or in
similarform,authorizes the Defendant to enter into this Agreement and take all necessarysteps
to effectuate this Agreement, and that the signatures on this Agreement by the Defendant and its
counsel are authorized by the Defendant's Board of Member Representatives on behalfof the
Defendant. In connectionwiththis Agreement, the Defendant wi l l also provide to the
Department acertified resolutionofthe Board ofDirectorsofAlcoa Inc., attached asExhibit2
hereto, or in similarform,that provides thatAlcoa Inc. ("Alcoa"),and its subsidiaries, divisions,
groups and affiliates, except for the Defendant,agreeto certain undertakings as setforth inthis
Agreement inexchangefor theUnitedStates'agreement in paragraph 20.
4. Except as may otherwise be agreed by the parties hereto in connectionwitha
particulartransaction, the Defendantagreesthat if ,at any timewhilethe Defendant has
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
3/52
obligationsunder this Agreement, the Defendant sells, merges, or transfers allor substantially all
of itsbusinessoperations as they exist asofthedateo fthisAgreement, whether such sale(s)
is/are structured as a stock orassetsale, merger, or transfer, the Defendant shall include in any
contract for sale, merger, or transfer aprovisionfullybindingthe purchaser(s) or any
successor(s)in interest thereto to theguaranteesandobligationsdescribed inthis Agreement.
5. The Defendant waives any statute oflimitationswithregard to any conduct
relatingto corrupt payments and related internal accounting controls or books and records
violationsas dateofthis Agreement through the full termofthe Defendant's probation anduntilall ofthe Defendant's obligationsunder this Agreement have been satisfied.
6. The Defendantagreesandrepresentsthat it has the full legalright,power, and
authorityto enter intoand performall ofits obligations under this Agreement.
7. The Defendantagreesto pay theUnitedStatesacriminal inthe amount of$209,000,000 in equal annual installments of Thefirstpayment shall be madein full on or before the tenth (10)businessday after thedateofthe entryo fthe judgment of
convictionfollowingthe Defendant's sentencing, and the second,third,fourthand fifth
payments shall be due infull, respectively, on thefirst, second,third,and fourth-year
anniversaries ofthe entryo fthe judgment ofconviction. The Defendantagreestowire transfer
thesepayments to the Clerk ofthe Court for theUnitedStatesDistrictCourt for the Western
Districto fPennsylvania. The Defendant furtheragreesto pay the Clerkofthe Court for the
UnitedStatesDistrictCourt for the WesternDistrictof Pennsylvania the mandatory special
assessmentof$400withinten businessdays fromthedateof entry ofthe judgment ofconviction. The Defendant acknowledges that no tax deductions may be sought in connection
withthe payment ofthe
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
4/52
As a resultofthe conduct as setforth inthe Statement of Facts,attached asExhibit3 hereto, the partiesagreethe Departmentcouldinstituteaciviland/or
criminalforfeiture action against certain funds held by the Defendant and that such fundswould
beforfeitablepursuant toTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section andTitle28,UnitedStatesCode, Section The Defendant hereby acknowledges that at least wasinvolved intransactions described inExhibit3inviolationofTitle UnitedStatesCode,Section78dd-2 andTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section2. The Defendant herebyagreestoadministrativelyforfeitto theUnitedStatesthe sum of $14,000,000 (the "ForfeitureAmount").
The Defendant andAlcoaherebyagreethat,inthe event the funds used to pay the Forfeiture
Amountare notdirectlytraceable to the transactions, the monies used to pay the Forfeiture
Amountshall be considered substituteresfor the purpose offorfeitureto theUnitedStates
pursuant toTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section and the Defendant andAlcoareleaseanyandallright,title,interest, and claims they may have to such funds. Toaccomplishthis
administrativeforfeiture,the Defendantagreesto pay the ForfeitureAmountplus any associated
transferfeeswithinten(10)business daysofthe date ofentryofthejudgmentofconviction
followingthe Defendant's sentencing by check orwiretransfer made payable to theUnited
StatesInternalRevenueService-Criminal Investigation. The Defendant andAlcoaagreeto sign
anyadditionaldocumentsnecessaryto completeforfeiture ofthefunds. The Defendant and
Alcoatake nopositionas to thedispositionofthe funds after payment andwaiveany statutory or
proceduralnotice requirementswithrespect to theUnited dispositionofthefunds. TheDefendant andAlcoa knowinglyandvoluntarilywaive anyclaimor defense they may have
under theEighthAmendmentoftheUnitedStatesConstitution,includinganyclaimof excessive
fineorpenaltywithrespect to theforfeited assets. Inthe event ofabreachofthisAgreement,
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
5/52
the Defendant andAlcoaacknowledge that theUnitedStatesmaypursueadditionalciviland
criminalforfeiture inexcessofthe Forfeiture Amount.
9. The Defendantagreesto abide byallterms and obligationsofthis Agreement as
described herein,including,but notlimitedto, the following:
a. to pleadguiltyas setforth inthis Agreement;
b. to abide by all sentencing stipulations contained in this Agreement;
c. toappear,through itsdulyappointed representatives, as ordered for all
courtappearances,and obey any other ongoing court order in this matter;
d. to commit no further crimes;
e. to betruthful atalltimeswiththe Court;
f. to pay the applicable and specialassessment;andg. to continue to participate in and abide by the Corporate Compliance
Program established byAlcoa,whichAlcoahasseparately agreedto continue to implement and
maintain,attached asExhibit4.
The Defendant agreesto continue tocooperatefully withthe Department, the
InternalRevenueService-CriminalInvestigationsDivision(the"IRS"),the Federal Bureau of
Investigation(the"FBF'),and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") in a
manner consistentwithapplicable law and regulations, in any and all matters relating to the
conduct described in this Agreement andExhibit3, and other conduct under investigationby the
Department that has commenced before or during the termofthisAgreement,untilthedateupon
whichallinvestigations and prosecutions arising out of such conduct are concluded, whether or
notthoseinvestigations and prosecutions are concludedwithinthe term of Defendant's probation
inparagraph Attherequestof the Department, the Defendant shallalso cooperate fully
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
6/52
withforeign law enforcement authorities andagenciesand theMultilateralDevelopment Banks
("MDBs"). Such cooperation shall include, but not belimitedto, the following:
a. The Defendant shall, to the extent consistent withthe foregoing, truthfully
disclose to the Department allfactualinformationnot protected by avalidclaimo f attorney-
client privilegeorworkproduct doctrine protectionwithrespectto the activitiesDefendant, Alcoaand their affiliates, theirpresentand former member representatives, directors,
officers,employees,agents,consultants, contractors, and subcontractors, concerningallmatters
relatingto corrupt payments to foreignpublicofficials or to employees ofprivatecustomersor
concerning related internal controls or books and records violationsaboutwhichthe Defendant
orAlcoahaveany knowledge and aboutwhichthe Department, theFBI,the IRS, the SEC, or, at
therequestofthe Department, any foreign law enforcement authorities andagenciesandMDBs,
shallinquire;
b. The Defendant shall provide to the Department, uponrequest,any non-
privilegedor non-protected document, record, or other tangible evidence relating to such corrupt
payments to foreignpublicofficials or to employees of privatecustomersaboutwhichthe
aforementioned authorities andagenciesshall inquireofthe Defendant, to the directionofthe Department; and
c. The Defendant shallensurethat the Department is givenaccessto all
current, and to the extent possible, former member representatives, officers, employees,agents,
and consultants of the Defendant andAlcoafor interviews and testimony in theUnitedStates
relatingto such payments.
The Defendantagreesthat i f itor any ofitsdirect or indirect affiliates or
subsidiariesissuesapressreleaseor holds apressconference in connectionwiththis Agreement,
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
7/52
the Defendant shallfirstconsultwiththe Department to determine whether (a) the textreleaseor proposedstatementsat anypressconference are true andaccuratewithrespectto
matters between the Department and the Defendant andAlcoa;and (b) the Department has no
objectionto thereleaseor statement. Statementsat anypressconference concerning this matter
shallbe consistentwiththispressrelease.
Alcoa's Agreement
12. Inexchangefor theUnitedStates'agreement inparagraph Alcoaagreesthat itand its subsidiaries, divisions, groups and affiliates will fulfill the commitments and be bound to
the terms outlined inparagraphs8, 9(g), and 13 to 19 of this Agreement and inExhibits2 and 4
attached hereto.
Alcoaagreestoguarantee,secureandensuredelivery by the Defendant of all
payments duefromthe Defendant under the Agreement;provided,however, that suchguarantee
shallbe expressly conditioned upon the Court'sacceptanceofthe Agreement and entryjudgment consistentwith all ofthe Agreement. Alcoaacknowledges that no taxdeductions may be sought in connectionwiththe payment
Alcoaagreesnot to institute or participate in any proceeding to interferewith,
alter, or bar enforcement of any penalty, specialassessmentor forfeiture order imposed onthe Defendant pursuant to this Agreement pursuant to the automatic stay or otherprovisionUnitedStatesBankruptcy Code.
Except as may otherwise be
by the parties hereto in connectionwitha
particulartransaction,Alcoaagreesthat if ,at any timewhile Alcoa stillhas obligations and
commitments to theUnitedStatesas set forth inthis Agreement,Alcoasells, merges, or transfers
all or substantially all ofitsbusinessoperations as they exist as date Agreement,
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
8/52
whether such sale(s) is/are structured as a stock orassetsale, merger, or transfer,Alcoashall
includein any contract for sale, merger, or transfer aprovisionfully bindingthe purchaser(s) or
any in interest thereto to theguaranteesandobligationsdescribed in this Agreement.Alcoaagreesthat i t and its subsidiaries,divisions,groups and affiliates shall
continue to cooperate fully on matters and in a manner substantiallysimilarto the cooperation
requiredoftheDefendant in paragraphs withthe Department, theIRS,theFBI,and theSEC. Such cooperation shall be in a manner consistentwithapplicable law and regulations.
Thisincludes cooperatingfullyin anyinvestigationofAlcoaand its subsidiaries, divisions,
groups andaffiliates,and any ofitspresent and formerofficers,directors, employees,agentsand
consultants, or any other party, in any andallmattersrelatingto this Agreement andExhibit3.
Alcoaagreesthat i f itor any ofitsdirect or indirect affiliates or subsidiaries
issuesapressreleaseor holds apressconference in connectionwiththis Agreement,Alcoashall
first consultwiththe Department to determine whether (a) the text of thereleaseor proposed
statementsat anypressconference are true and accurate withrespect to matters between the
Department and the Defendant andAlcoa;and (b) the Department has no objection to therelease
orstatement. Statements at anypressconference concerning this matter shall be consistent with
thispressrelease.
Other than as may benecessarywithrespect todefenseo fcivil litigationor
arbitration relatingto this matter,Alcoawaivesallrights,whetherasserteddirectlyor by a
representative, to request or receivefromany department or agency oftheUnitedStatesany
records pertaining to theinvestigationor prosecution case,includingwithoutlimitationany records that may be sought under the Freedom ofInformationAct, Title5,UnitedStates
Code, Section 552, or the PrivacyAct, Title5,UnitedStatesCode, Section 552a.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
9/52
Alcoawaives alldefenses basedon thestatuteoflimitations,venue,speedytrial
under theUnitedStatesConstitutionand theSpeedyTrialAct, and any and all constitutional and
defenseswithrespectto any prosecution ofAlcoathat is not time-barred on
thedatethat this Agreement is signed related to or arisingfromthe conduct charged in the
Informationto be filedagainst the Defendant, in the event thatAlcoa failstofulfill its
commitments as setforth in this Agreement for anyreason,provided such prosecution is brought
withinone year of such breach or failure plus the remaining time periodof thestatuteo f
limitationsas of thedatethat this Agreement is signed.
The United Agreement20. Inexchangefor theguiltyplea ofthe Defendant and the complete fulfillmentof
all of the Defendant's and Alcoa's obligations as setforthin this Agreement, the Department
agreesthat itwil lnot file additionalcriminalchargesagainst the Defendant orAlcoa,or any of
theirdirect or indirect affiliates or subsidiaries, relating to (a) any ofthe conduct described in the
Statement of Facts, attached asExhibit3, or thecriminalinformation filedpursuant to this
Agreement or (b)informationdisclosed by the Defendant orAlcoato the Departmentpriorto the
dateofthisAgreement. This paragraphdoesnot provide any protection against prosecution for
any corrupt payments, false accounting, or failure to implement internal controls or
circumventionofinternalcontrols,if any, madeinthe future by the Defendant orAlcoa. This
Agreementdoesnot close or preclude the investigation or prosecution of any naturalpersons,
includingany officers, directors, member representatives, employees, agents,or consultants of
the Defendant orAlcoa,who mayhave beeninvolvedin any ofthe matters setforth in the
Information,Statement of Facts, or in any other matters.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
10/52
FactualBasis
The Defendant is pleadingguiltybecauseit isguiltyof the charge contained in the
Information. The Defendant admits,agrees,and stipulatesonlythat the factual allegationswith
respect to its conduct as setforth inthe Statement of Facts, attached hereto asExhibit3 and
incorporated herein, are true and correct, that it is responsible for theactsofitsofficers and
employees describedinthe Statement of Facts, and that the Statement ofFactsaccurately reflects
the Defendant's criminalconduct.
Defendant's WaiverofRights, Includingthe Right to Appeal
22. Federal Rule ofCriminalProcedure and Federal RuleofEvidence limittheadmissibilityo fstatementsmade in the course ofplea proceedings or plea discussions in both
civilandcriminalproceedings, i ftheguiltyplea is laterwithdrawn. The Defendant expressly
warrants that it has discussed theseruleswithits counsel and understands them. Solely to the
extent setforthbelow,the Defendantvoluntarilywaives and gives up the rights enumerated in
Federal Rule ofCriminalProcedure and Federal Rule of Evidence Specifically, theDefendant understands andagreesthat anystatementsthat it makes in the course ofitsguilty
plea or in connectionwiththe Agreement are admissible against it for any purpose in any U.S.
federalcriminalproceeding if,even though the Department has fulfilled allo fitsobligations
under this Agreement and the Court has imposed the agreed-upon sentence,the Defendant
nevertheless withdrawsitsguiltyplea.
23. The Defendant is satisfied that the Defendant's attorneys have rendered effective
assistance. The Defendant understands that by enteringintothis Agreement, the Defendant
surrenders certain rights as providedinthis Agreement. The Defendant understands that the
rightsofcriminaldefendants include the following:
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
11/52
a. I f the Defendant had persisted in a plea of notguiltyto the charges, the
Defendantwouldhave therightto aspeedyjurytrial withtheassistanceofcounsel. Thetrial
may be conducted by a judgesitting withoutajury i fthe Defendant, theUnitedStates,and the
Courtallagree.
b. At atrial,theUnitedStateswouldbe required to present its witnesses and
other evidence against the Defendant. The Defendantwouldbe able to confront and cross-
examineadversewitnesses. Inturn,the Defendantcould,butwouldnot be requiredto,present
witnesses and other evidence on itsownbehalf. I fthe witnesses for the Defendantwouldnot
appearvoluntarily,the Defendantcouldrequire theirattendancethrough the subpoena power of
the Court.
c. At atrial,no inference ofguiltcouldbe drawnfromthe Defendant's
refusalto present evidence. However,i fthe Defendant desired to do so, itcould present
evidence on itsownbehalf.
24. The Defendant also understands thatTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section 3742,affordsa defendant therightto appeal thesentence imposed. Nonetheless, the Defendant
knowinglywaives therightto appeal theconvictionandsentenceimposed by the Court,
providedthat suchsentenceis consistentwiththe terms Agreement, in exchange forconcessions made by theUnitedStatesinthis Agreement. This Agreementdoesnot affect the
rightsorobligationsoftheUnitedStatesas setforthinTitle UnitedStatesCode, Section3742(b).
25. The Defendant is also aware that theUnitedStatesConstitutionand the laws of
theUnitedStatesaffordthe Defendant therightto contest or"collaterallyattack" itsconviction
orsentenceafter theconvictionhas become final. Knowingthat, the Defendant knowingly
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
12/52
waives therightto contest or"collaterallyattack" the Defendant's plea,conviction,andsentence,
providedthat suchsentenceis consistentwiththe termsofthis Agreement, bymeanspost-convictionproceeding.
26. Other than as may benecessarywithrespect todefenseofcivillitigationor
arbitration relatingto this matter, the Defendant also hereby waivesallrights,whetherasserted
directlyor by a representative, to request or receive fromany department or agency UnitedStatesany records pertaining to theinvestigationor prosecutionofthiscase,including without
limitationany records that may be sought under the Freedom ofInformationAct, Title5,United
StatesCode, Section 552, or the PrivacyAct, Title5,UnitedStatesCode, Section 552a.
27. The Defendant waives alldefenses basedon the statute oflimitationsand venue
withrespect to any prosecution that is not time-barred on thedatethat this Agreement is signed
inthe event that: (a) theconvictionis later vacated for any reason; (b) the Defendant or Alcoa
violatesthis Agreement; or (c) the plea is laterwithdrawn,provided such prosecution is brought
withinone year of any such vacation ofconviction,violationof agreement, orwithdrawalofplea
plus the remaining time period statute oflimitationsasofthedatethat this Agreement issigned. The Department free to take anypositionon appeal or any other post-judgment matter.
28. The Defendant waives alldefensesto its conduct charged inthe Information
basedon venue,speedytrialunder the UnitesStatesConstitutionand the SpeedyTrialAct,and
any and allconstitutionalandnon-jurisdictional defects.
29. The Defendant acknowledges that no threats have been made against the
Defendant and that the Defendant is pleadingguiltyfreely andvoluntarilybecausethe Defendant
isguilty.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
13/52
Penalty
30. The statutorymaximumsentencethat the Court can impose for aviolationofTitle
UnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-2, is a of $2,000,000 ortwicethegrosspecuniary gainorgrosspecuniary loss resultingfromthe offense, whichever isgreatest,Title UnitedStatesCode, Section and(d); years' probation,Title UnitedStatesCode, Section
and a mandatory specialassessmentof $400,Title18,UnitedStatesCode, Section
3013(a)(2)(B).
The Defendant hereby stipulates andagreesnot to institute or participate in any
proceeding to interferewith,alter, or bar enforcement of anyfine,penalty, specialassessmentor
forfeiture order pursuant to the automatic stay or otherprovisiono ftheUnitedStatesBankruptcy
Code.
32. The Defendantagreesthatnothingi nthis Agreement is intended toreleasethe
Defendant fromany and allofthe Defendant's excise and income taxliabilitiesand reporting
obligationsfor any and all income not properly reported and/or legallyorillegallyobtained or
derived.
Sentencing Recommendation
TheUnitedStatesand the Defendantagreethat pursuant to UnitedStates v.
Booker,543 U.S. 220 (2005), the Court must determine an advisory sentencing guidelinerange
pursuant to theUnitedStatesSentencing Guidelines. The Court wil lthen determine areasonable
sentencewithinthe statutoryrangeafter considering the advisory sentencing guidelinerangeand
the factors listed inTitle 18,UnitedStatesCode, Section 3553(a). The parties' agreement herein
toany guideline sentencing factors constitutesproofofthosefactors sufficient to satisfy the
applicable burden of proof.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
14/52
34. The UnitedStatesand the Defendantagreethat afaithful applicationofthe
UnitedStatesSentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) to determine the applicable rangeyields thefollowing analysis:
a. The 2012 U.S.S.G. are applicable to this matter.
b. Offense Based upon U.S.S.G. 2C1.1,the total offense level is 48,calculated as follows:
(a)(2) BaseOffense Level
(1) MultipleBribes
Value of benefit received
Morethan $400,000,000
Offense involvedahigh-leveldecision-making
public official
TOTAL
c. BaseFine. Based upon U.S.S.G. 8C2.4(a)(l) and 2Cl.l(d),thebase
fineis $446,000,000 (the pecuniary gainfrom the offense)
d. CulpabilityScore. Based upon U.S.S.G.
the culpabilityscoreis5, calculated as follows:
(a) BaseCulpabilityScore 5
(4) the organization had 50 or more employees and
anindividualwithinsubstantial authority
personnel participatedin,condoned, or was
willfully ignorantofthe offense +2
(g)(1) The organizationfullycooperated in the
investigationand clearly demonstrated recognitionand affirmativeacceptanceof responsibilityfor its
criminalconduct
-2
12
+2
+30
+4
48
TOTAL 5
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
15/52
Calculationo fFine Range:
BaseFine $446,000,000
Multipliers 1.0(min)/2.0(max)
Fine Range $446,000,000 / $892,000,000
35. Pursuant to Rule Federal Rules ofCriminalProcedure, theUnitedStatesand the Defendantagreethat thefollowingrepresentsthe appropriatedisposition
of thecase:
Defendantagreethat the appropriatedispositiono fthiscaseis, andagreeto recommendjointly,
that the Court impose asentencerequiringthe Defendant to pay to theUnitedStatesacriminal
fineof $209,000,000. Becausethe immediate paymentofthe entirefine "wouldposean undue
burden on" the Defendant andAlcoa,U.S.S.G. 8C3.2(b),theUnitedStatesand the Defendant
agreethat the entire shall be paid in equal annual installments of withthefirstpayment due infull on or before the tenth businessday after thedateof the entry ofthe judgment ofconviction. Thereafter, the second,third,fourthandfifth payments shall each be
due infull,respectively, on thefirst, second,third,and fourth-year anniversaries ofthedateof
the entryo fjudgment ofconviction("the recommended sentence"). TheUnitedStatesand the
Defendant have agreed that afineof $209,000,000 is the appropriatedispositionbasedon the
following factors andthosein U.S.C.3553(a): (a) the impact of a penalty withintheguidelinesrange on thefinancial conditionofthe Defendant's majority shareholder, Alcoa,and
itspotential to "substantiallyjeopardiz[e]"Alcoa'sabilityto compete,seeU.S.S.G. 8C3.3(b),
including,but notlimitedto, itsabilitytofundits sustaining andimprovingcapital expenditures,
a. Fine. Pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. theUnitedStatesand the
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
16/52
itsabilityto invest inresearchand development, itsabilityto fund its pension obligations, and its
abilityto maintainnecessarycashreservesto fund its operations andmeetitsliabilities;(b) the
significant remedy being imposed on the Defendant's majorityshareholder,Alcoa, by the U.S.
Securities andExchangeCommission for Alcoa's conduct inthis matter; (c) after learningallegations of FCPAviolations,Alcoa's Board of Directors appointed a Special Committee of
the Board of Directors tooverseean internal investigation by independent counsel; (d) the
substantial cooperation provided to the Department by the Defendant's majorityshareholder,
Alcoa,including conducting an extensive internal investigation,voluntarilymakingemployees
available for interviews, andcollecting,analyzing, and organizing voluminous evidence and
informationfor the Department; (e) the remedial efforts already undertaken and to be undertaken
bythe Defendant's majorityshareholder,Alcoa, which affect both the Defendant's operations
andthoseofAlcoa, includingthehiringof new senior legal and ethics and compliance officers
and the implementation ofenhanceddue diligence reviews ofthe retentionofthird-partyagents
and consultants; and (f) Alcoa'sseparatecommitment to ensuring that its anti-corruption
compliance programwil lbe maintained to continue to satisfy theminimumelementsset forthin
Exhibit4 to this Agreement.
b. Mandatory SpecialAssessment. The Defendant shall pay to the Clerk of
the Court for the UnitedStatesDistrictCourt for the WesternDistrictof Pennsylvania withinten
businessdaysofthedateofthe entry of the judgment ofconvictionthe mandatory special
assessmentof $400.
c. A Term of Four Years Probation. A four-year termofprobation shall be
imposed on the Defendant. The term of probation shall include the following mandatory and
discretionary special conditions,pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 3563(a) and (b): (i) The Defendant
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
17/52
shallnot commit another federal,stateorlocalcrime;(ii)the Defendant shall provide the
probationofficer withanyinformationor documents requested by the probationofficer; (iii)the
Defendant shallnotify the Court of any materialchangeinthe Defendant's economic
circumstances that might affect the Defendant's abilityto pay the fines and other financial
obligationssetforthherein; and(iv)the Defendant shall pay thecriminal setforthinparagraph 35(a) above.
d. Court NotBound. This Agreement is presented to the Court pursuant to
Fed. R.Crim.P. The Defendantunderstandsthat, i fthe Court rejects thisAgreement, the Court must: (a)informthe parties that the Court rejects the Agreement; (b)
advise the Defendant's counsel that the Court is not required tofollowthe Agreement and afford
the Defendant theopportunitytowithdrawits plea; and (c) advise the Defendant that i fthe plea
isnotwithdrawn,the Court maydisposeofthiscaselessfavorably toward the Defendant than
the Agreement contemplated. I fthe Court this Agreement pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P.theUnitedStatesand the Defendantagreethat the Defendant wi l lbeallowedto
withdrawits plea, and that neither the Defendant nor theUnitedStatesshall be bound by the
provisionsofthisAgreement. I fthe Defendantwithdrawsits plea ofguiltyunder the
circumstances described in the immediately precedingsentence,this Agreement, theguiltyplea,
and any statementmadein thecourseof any proceeding under Fed. R.Crim.P. regarding theguiltyplea or this Agreement, ormadeinthecourseofplea discussions withan attorney for the
UnitedStates,shall not be admissible against the Defendant in anycriminalorcivil proceeding.
The Defendant, however, alsounderstandsthat i fthe Courtacceptsthis Agreement, the Court is
bound by the sentencing provisionsinparagraphs35(a), (b) and (c).
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
18/52
36. The parties furtheragree,withthe permission of the Court, to waive the
requirement ofapre-sentenceinvestigationreport pursuant to Federal Rule ofCriminal
Procedure 32(c)(l)(A)(ii),basedon afindingby the Court that the record contains information
sufficient toenablethe Court to meaningfully exercise its sentencing power. The partiesagree,
however, that in the event the Court orders the preparation of apre-sentenceinvestigationreport
priorto sentencing, such orderwi l lnot affect the Agreement set forthherein. Inthe event the
Courtso orders, the Department wil l fully informthe preparer of thepre-sentencereport and the
Courtofthe facts and law related to the Defendant's case.
37. The parties furtheragreeto ask the Court's permission to combine the entryplea and sentencing into one proceeding, and to conduct the plea and sentencing hearings Defendant in one proceeding. The partiesagree,however, that inthe event the Court orders that
the entry guiltyplea and sentencing hearing occur atseparateproceedings, such an orderwillnot affect the Agreement setforthherein.
Breachof Agreement
38. The Defendantagreesthat if itbreachesthe terms ofthis Agreement, commits any
federal crimesubsequentto thedateofthis Agreement, or has provided or provides deliberately
false, incomplete, or misleadinginformationin connectionwiththis Agreement, the Department
may, in its sole discretion, characterize such conduct as a breach Agreement. Inthe eventofsuch a breach, (a) the Departmentwil lbe free fromits obligations under the Agreement and
may take whateverpositionit believes appropriate as to thesentence;(b) the Defendant wil lnot
havetherighttowithdrawtheguiltyplea; (c) the Defendant shall befully subject tocriminal
prosecution for any other crimes that it has committed,if any, includingperjury and obstruction
ofjustice;and (d) the Departmentwil lbe free to use against the Defendant, directly and
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
19/52
indirectly,in anycriminalorcivilproceeding any informationor materials provided by theDefendant andAlcoapursuant to this Agreement, aswellas the admitted Statement of Facts.
39. In the event of a breach ofthis Agreement by the Defendant, i fthe Department
electsto pursuecriminalchargesor anycivilor administrative action that was notfiledas a
result of this Agreement, then:
a. The Defendantagreesthat any applicablestatuteoflimitationsistolled
between thedateofthe Defendant's signingofthis Agreement and the discovery by the
Department of any breach by the Defendant, plus one year; and
b. The Defendant gives up alldefenses basedon thestatuteoflimitations
relatingto the facts and conduct describedinthe Statement ofFactsand thecriminal information
tobefiledagainst the Defendant pursuant to this Agreement, anyclaimof delay,or anyspeedytrialclaimwithrespectto any such prosecution or action, except to the extent that
suchdefensesexisted asofthedateofthe signingofthis Agreement.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
20/52
Complete Agreement
40. This documentstatesthe fullextent ofthe agreement between the parties. There
are no other promises or agreements, expressorimplied. Any modification Agreementshallbevalidonly i fsetforthinwritingin a supplemental or revised plea agreement signed by
allparties.
AGREED:
FOR ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC:
Date:January
Date:January
By:
By:
DECHERTBy: Robert J.Jossen
No. 1393719Jonathan R. StreeterN Y No. 5034186Counsel for
AlcoaWorldAlumina LLC
THE DEPARTMENTOFJUSTICE:
JEFFREYH . KNOX
Chief,Fraud Section
CriminalDivision,Department of Justice
By:
AdamG.DeputyChief, Fraud SectionNY ID No. 2657567
AndrewN .Gentin
DC ID No. 459889
AllanJ. Medina
AndrewH .Warren
TrialAttorneys,Fraud Section
By:
DAVID J. IIICKTON
AttorneyPA No. 34524
Date: January 2014
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
21/52
OF F I C ER ' S C E R T I F I C A T E
I have read this Agreement and carefully reviewed every part ofitwithoutside counsel
for AlcoaWorldAluminaLLC (the "Defendant"). I understand the terms ofthisAgreement and
voluntarilyagree,on behalf of the Defendant, to each ofits terms. Before signing this
Agreement, I consulted outside counsel for the Defendant. Counselfullyadvised meof the
rightsofthe Defendant, ofpossibledefenses, ofthe Sentencing Guidelines' provisions, and of
theconsequencesof enteringintothis Agreement.
I have carefully reviewed the terms Agreementwiththe BoardofMemberRepresentatives of the Defendant. I have advised andcausedoutside counsel for the Defendant
to advise the Board ofMemberRepresentatives fully ofthe rights of the Defendant, of possible
defenses, ofthe Sentencing Guidelines' provisions, ando ftheconsequenceso f enteringintothe
Agreement.
I have read this Statement ofFactsand carefully reviewed every part o fitwithoutside
counsel for the Defendant. Ivoluntarilyagree,on behalfofthe Defendant, that the Statement of
Facts, to the extentinvolvingthe conductofthe Defendant, is true and accurate.
No promises or inducements have been made other thanthosecontained in this
Agreement. Furthermore, no one has threatened or forced me, or to my knowledge any person
authorizingthis Agreement on behalf ofthe Defendant, in any way to enterintothis Agreement.
I am also satisfiedwithoutside counsel's representation inthismatter. Icertifythat I am
/ / /
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
22/52
Secretary ofAlcoaWorldAluminaLLCand that Ihave beendulyauthorized by the Defendant
toexecute this Agreement on behalfofthe Defendant.
Date: January ft , 2014
ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC
Secretary
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
23/52
C E R T I F I C A T E OFCOUNSE L
We are counsel for AlcoaWorldAluminaLLC(the "Defendant") in the matter covered
bythis Agreement. In connectionwithsuch representation, wehaveexamined the relevant
documentsandhave discussedthetermsofthis Agreement withthe Defendant's Board of
MemberRepresentatives. Basedon our review of the foregoing materials anddiscussions,we
are of the opinion that therepresentativeof the Defendant signing this Agreement hasbeenduly
authorized toenterinto this Agreement on behalf Defendant and that this Agreement hasbeenduly andvalidlyauthorized, executed, and delivered on behalf of the Defendant and is a
validand binding obligationofthe Defendant. Further, wehavecarefully reviewed thetermsof
this Agreement withthe BoardofMemberRepresentativesand the Legal Counsel and Company
SecretaryofAlcoaWorldAluminaLLC. Wehavefully advised themofthe rightsDefendant, of possibledefenses, Sentencing Guidelines' provisions and of theconsequencesof entering into this Agreement.
Wehavecarefully reviewed theabove StatementofFactswithour client. To our
knowledge, the decision of the Defendant to stipulate tothesefacts, to the extent involvingthe
conduct Defendant, basedon the authorization Board of MemberRepresentatives,isan informed and voluntary one.
Toour knowledge, the decisiono fthe Defendant toenterinto this Agreement,basedon
the authorizationofthe Board of MemberRepresentatives,is an informed and voluntary one.
Date: January , 2014
By: Robert J.Jossen
JonathanR.Streeter
Counsel for AlcoaWorldAlumina LLC
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
24/52
E X H IB IT1
C E R T I F I C A T E OF CORPORATE RESOLUTIONSO F
A L C O A WORLD ALUMINA L L C
A copyofthe executed Certificate of Corporate Resolutions ofAlcoaWorldAlumina
LLC is annexed hereto asExhibit
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
25/52
A L C O A W O R L D ALUMINA L L C
C E R T I F I C A T E OF C O R P O R A T E RESOLUTIONS
I , Jeffrey D. Heeter, do hereby certify that I am the Secretary ofAlcoa World Alumina
LLC(the "Company"), a majority-owned subsidiary ofAlcoaInc. formed under the lawsStateof Delaware and maintaining its principal place ofbusinessin Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,
and that the following is an accurate excerpt of certain resolutions adopted by the Board ofMember Representatives of the Company at a meeting held on December 9, atwhich aquorumwaspresent:
WH EREAS, the Board of Member Representatives of the Company has
been informed by its counsel of a proposed settlement with the United States
Department of Justice ("DOJ") in relation to certain matters which have been
under investigation by DOJ (the "Proposed Settlement"), and the key terms of the
Proposed Settlementhave beenreviewedwiththe members of the Board;
WH EREAS,the Proposed Settlement contemplates:
(1) The Company pleading guilty to one count ofviolating the anti-
bribery provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of as amended,pursuant to a plea agreement withthe DOJ (the "Plea Agreement");
(2) the government and the Company agreeing to recommend to the
Court a of $209,000,000 payable in equal annual installments of$41,800,000, as appropriate under the circumstances; and the Company agreeing
topay to theUnited Statesan administrative, non-refundable forfeiture amount of
$14,000,000;
(3) the Court retaining the ability toacceptor the terms of thePlea Agreement under Fed. R.Crim.P.
(4) imposition on the Company of certain commitments set out in the
Plea Agreement;
(5) the Company agreeing to include in any agreement for the sale,
merger or transfer ofallor substantially all ofitsbusinessoperations as they exist
onthedate Plea Agreement the requirement that thesuccessororpurchasercompany abide by the commitments set out inclauses(2) and (4) above; and
(6) The Company agreeing to (a) a knowing waiver of its rights to a
speedy trialpursuant to the SixthAmendment to theUnited StatesConstitution,Title United States Code, Section and Federal Rule of CriminalProcedure (b) a knowing waiver forpurposes of the Plea Agreement andany charges by the United States arising out of the conduct described in the
Statement ofFacts attached to the Plea Agreement or the criminal Information
any with respectto venue, andconsentsto the entry of aguiltyplea, asprovided pursuant to the terms of the Plea Agreement, in the United States
DistrictCourt for the WesternDistrictof Pennsylvania; and (c) aknowingwaiver
of anydefenses basedon thestatuteo flimitationsfor any prosecution relating to
the conduct described i n the Statement of Facts, criminalInformation,or relating
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
26/52
to conduct known to the DOJpriorto thedateonwhichthe Plea Agreement was
signed that is not time-barred by the applicablestatuteoflimitationson thedateof
the signingofthe Plea Agreement.
NOW, T HE RE FO RE , BE IT:
R E S O L V E D , that the Board of Member Representatives Company,after thorough consideration ofal l relevantissues,includingconsidering thecostsand benefits of settlement, and considering the advice and conclusions of outside
legalcounsel and management, deemsit advisable and in thebestinterests of the
Company and its relevant constituencies for the Board of Member
Representatives to approve the key terms of the Proposed Settlement that have
beenreviewedwiththe Board at this meeting, and such key terms ProposedSettlement be and they hereby are approved substantially as presented at this
meeting; and
F U R T H E R R E S O L V E D , that the proper officers and Member
Representatives of the Company, and counsel for the Company, are eachhereby
authorized and directed to execute and deliver allagreements, instruments anddocuments, and to take such other and further actions whichin theopinionof any
of them may be necessary or desirable to achieve the purposes of or to
consummate the Proposed Settlement and the resolution of the investigation of
past payments and practices referenced in the Plea Agreement, including
appearing before the United States District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania to enter a plea ofguiltyon behalf of the Company andaccept the
sentence Court, the taldng of any such action or the execution and deliveryof any such agreements, instruments or documents to be conclusive evidence of
the authority to take, execute or deliver thesame.
I further certify that the aforesaid resolutionshavenotbeenamended or revoked in any
respectand remain infullforce and effect on thedateof thiscertification.
IN WITNESS W H E R E O F , Ihaveexecuted this Certificate on January 8,
Jeffrey D. Heeter
Secretary
AlcoaWorldAlumina LLC
Signed before me this dayNotary inand for the ofPennsylvania , / /
2014.
NotarialJennifer Notary Public
of Pittsburgh, Allegheny CountyCommission June6, 2017
OF
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
27/52
E X H IB IT2
C E R T I F I C A T E OF CORPORATE RESOLUTIONSOF
A L C O A INC.
Acopy of the executed Certificate of Corporate Resolutions ofAlcoaInc. is annexed
heretoasExhibit2.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
28/52
ALCOA INC.
C E R T I F I C A T E OF CORPORATE RESO LUTIO NS
I , Brenda A. Hart, do hereby certify that I am an Assistant Secretary ofAlcoaInc. (the
"Company"), a company incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,and that the following is an accurate excerpt o f certain resolutions adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Company at a meeting held on December 6, at which a quorum waspresent:
WHEREAS, the Board ofDirectorsof the Company has been informed
by its counsel of a proposed settlement with the United StatesDepartment of
Justice ("DOJ") inrelationto certain matterswhichhave been underinvestigation
by DOJ (the "Proposed Settlement"), and the key terms of the Proposed
Settlement have been reviewedwiththe members ofthe Board;
WHEREAS, the Proposed Settlement contemplates:
(1) The Company's majority-owned affiliated entity, Alcoa World
Alumina LLC, pleading guilty to one count of violating the anti-bribery
provisionsof the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of as amended, pursuant toa plea agreementwiththe DOJ (the "PleaAgreement");
(2) the government and Alcoa World Alumina LLC agreeing to
recommend to the Court a of $209,000,000, payable in equal annualinstallmentsof $41,800,000 byAlcoa World Alumina LLC as appropriate under
the circumstances; andAlcoaWorldAluminaLLC agreeing to pay to theUnited
Statesanadministrative,non-refundableforfeiture amount of $14,000,000;
(3) the Court retaining the ability to accept or the terms of thePlea Agreement under Fed. R.Crim.P.
(4) impositionof certain commitments set out in the Plea Agreement
on the Company and onAlcoa World Alumina LLC, including the Company's
guaranteeto theUnited Statesof the payment byAlcoa World Alumina LLC of
the fine and forfeiture amount to be imposed onAlcoa WorldAlumina LLC under the Plea Agreement and the continued implementation and
maintenance of ananti-corruption compliance program as specified by the Plea
Agreement;
(5) the Company agreeing to include in any agreement for the sale,
merger or transfer ofall or substantially all ofitsbusinessoperations as they exist
on thedateof the Plea Agreement the requirement that thesuccessoror purchaser
company abide by the commitments set out inclauses(2) and (4) above; and
(6) The Company agreeing to (a) aknowingwaiver of its rights to a
speedy trialpursuant to the SixthAmendment to theUnited StatesConstitution,
Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161, and Federal Rule of Criminal
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
29/52
Procedure 48(b); (b) aknowingwaiver forpurposesof the Plea Agreement and
any charges by the United States arising out of the conduct described in the
Statement ofFacts attached to the Plea Agreement or criminal Information any
objectionwithrespect to venue in theUnitedStatesDistrictCourt for the Western
Districtof Pennsylvania; and (c) aknowingwaiver of anydefenses basedon the
statute oflimitationsfor any prosecution relating to the conduct described in theStatement of Facts, criminalInformation,orrelatingto conductknownto the DOJ
priorto thedateonwhichthe Plea Agreement was signed that is not time-barred
by the applicable statute of limitations on the date of the signing of the Plea
Agreement.
NOW, TH ER EF OR E, BE IT:
R E S O L V E D , that the Board ofDirectorsof the Company, after thorough
consideration ofallrelevantissues,includingconsidering thecostsand benefits of
settlement, and considering the advice and conclusions of outside legal counsel
and management, and upon the recommendation of the Special Committee
comprisingthe Senior Advisors to the Board,deemsit advisable and in thebest
interests of the Company and its relevant constituencies for the Board ofDirectors
to approve the key terms ofthe Proposed Settlement that have been reviewedwith
the Board at this meeting, and such key terms of the Proposed Settlement be and
they hereby are approved substantially as presented at this meeting; and
F U R T H E R R E S O L V E D , that the proper officers of the Company and
counsel for the Company are each hereby authorized and directed to take such
actions as are necessary to effect the Proposed Settlement, including the
guaranteesof the Company to the United States,and to execute and deliver all
agreements, instruments and documents and to take such other and further actions
whichin theopinionof any ofthemmay benecessaryor desirable to achieve thepurposesof or to consummate the Proposed Settlement and the resolution of the
investigation of past payments and practices by Alcoa World AluminaLLC
referenced in the Plea Agreement, including appearing before the UnitedStates
District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania at the time the Plea
Agreement is accepted by the Court to confirm the Company's undertakings
pursuant to the Plea Agreement, the taking of any such action or the execution
and delivery of any such agreements, instruments or documents to be conclusive
evidence ofthe authority to take, execute or deliver thesame.
I further certify that the aforesaid resolutions have not been amended or revoked in any
respect and remain infull force and effect on thedate certification.IN WITNESS WH E R E O F ,I have executed this Certificate on January 6th, 2014.
BrendaA .Hart
Assistant Secretary
AlcoaInc.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
30/52
Signedbeforemethis dayofJanuary, 2014.Notary Publicinand for the StateofNew York
Notary Public,StateofNew YorkNo. 02LA6245285
Qualified inNew YorkCountyExpires July
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
31/52
EXff lBIT 3
STATEMENT OF FACTS
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
32/52
E X H IB IT3
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Thefollowing Statement ofFactsis incorporated by reference as partofthe Plea
Agreement (the "Agreement") between theUnitedStatesDepartment o f Justice, Criminal
Division,Fraud Section (the "Department") and the Defendant,ALCOAWORLD ALUMINA
LLC. ALCOAWORLDALUMINALLCherebyagreesand stipulates that the following
information,to the extent itrelatesto its actions and the actions ofitsofficers and employees, is
true and accurate. ALCOAWORLDALUMINALLCdoesnot admit to the conduct of any
other entity or person, andreferencesto such conduct are for backgroundpurposesonly.
ALCOAWORLDALUMINALLCadmits,accepts,and acknowledges that it is responsible for
theactsofitsofficers or employees, as setforthbelow. ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC
furtheragreesthat itwil lneither contest theadmissibilityof, nor contradict, this Statement of
Factswithrespectto its actions or the actions ofitsofficers or employees in any prosecution ofit
arisingfroma breachof
the Agreement.
I f thismatter were to proceed totrial,the Department has represented that itwouldprove
beyond areasonabledoubt, by admissible evidence, the facts alleged below, and that this
evidencewouldestablish the following:
Relevant Entities and Individuals
TheDefendant
Defendant A L C O A W O R L D ALUMINA L L Cwas aLimited Liability
Company formed under Delaware lawwhichmaintained itsprincipalplace ofbusinessin
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in the WesternDistrictof Pennsylvania. ALCOAWORLD
ALUMINALLCowned and operated (eitherdirectlyorindirectly)bauxiteminingand alumina
1
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
33/52
refiningassetsinNorthAmerica,Europe, SouthAmerica,Africaand the Caribbean. ALCOA
WORLDALUMINALLCwas a "domestic concern"withinthe meaning of the FCPA,TitleUnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-2(a).
Relevant Alcoa Entities
2. AlcoaInc.("Alcoa")was acorporationorganized under the laws of the
Commonwealth ofPennsylvania. Until2006, Alcoa'sprincipalplace ofbusinesswas in
Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,i nthe WesternDistrictofPennsylvania. In 2006,Alcoamoved its
principalplace ofbusinessto NewYork,NewYork. Alcoaissued and maintained aclasso f
publiclytraded securities registered pursuant to Section
ofthe Securities Exchange Act of
whichwere traded on the NewYorkStock Exchange. Alcoawas therefore an"issuer"
withinthe meaning FCPA,Title 15,UnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-l(a).Alcoawas aglobalproviderofprimaryaluminiumand fabricatedaluminium.
Alcoawasalsoaglobalprovider of smeltergradealumina, the rawmaterialthat is supplied to
smelters to produce aluminium. Alcoarefined aluminafrombauxite it extractedfromits global
miningoperations. Alcoaoperatedworldwidethrough subsidiaries andaffiliated entities in
NorthAmerica,Asia,Australia,Europe, SouthAmerica,Africaand the Caribbean.
4. AlcoaWorldAluminaandChemicals("AWAC")was an unincorporated global
bauxiteminingand aluminarefiningenterprise formed in betweenAlcoaandAluminaLimited ("Alumina"),themajority andminorityowners ofAWAC,respectively. AWAC
conducted its operations by and through the coordinatedactivityof severalaffiliated enterprise
companies,witheachenterprise company being owned byAlcoaandAluminainproportionto
theirrespective ownership interests in theAWACenterprise. Inmatters of strategy andpolicy,
theAWACenterprise companies receiveddirectionand counselfroma "StrategicCouncil"that
2
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
34/52
was chaired byAlcoa. AWACwas a "domestic concern"withinthe meaningofthe FCPA,Title
UnitedStatesCode, Section 78dd-2(a).
Defendant WORLDALUMINALLCwas anAWAC enterprisecompany. Beginning in or around 2000, executives atALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC's
offices in Pittsburgh andKnoxville,Tennessee,assumedprimary responsibility for all of
relationships withglobal alumina customers, includingAluminiumBahrain B.S.C.
("Alba"),a state-owned and state-controlled aluminiumsmelter in Bahrain. ALCOAWORLD
ALUMINALLCpersonnel responsible forthesefunctions reportedindirectlytoAlcoapersonnel
inNewYork.
6. Alcoa ofAustralia Limited("Alcoa ofAustralia")was theAWAC enterprise
company that owned and operatedAWAC'sbauxiteminingand aluminarefiningassetsin
Australia. Alcoa of Australia'sprincipalplace ofbusinesswas in Melbourne,Australia,until
and was thereafter in Perth,Australia. Alcoa ofAustraliaowned and operated mines in
WesternAustraliathat extracted bauxite,whichAlcoa ofAustraliathenprocessedinto smelter
gradealumina in refineries it owned and operated. Alcoa ofAustraliasold the smeltergrade
aluminatoaluminiumsmelters it owned in thestateofVictoria,Australia, aswellas to
customersand aluminatradersaround theworld.
RelevantALCOA WORLDALUMINA LLC Individual
7. Executive Aheld a seniorsalesand marketing position atALCOA WORLD
ALUMINALLC in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, starting in or around 2000, when he took over
responsibilityfor the relationshipwithAlba.
TheIntermediaryandRelatedEntities
3
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
35/52
8. Consultant Awas an international middleman who resided in London and was a
citizenofCanada,Jordan, and the UnitedKingdom. Consultant A hadclosecontactswith
certainmembersof Bahrain's RoyalFamily,someofwhomwere senior officials in the
Government of Bahrain. Consultant A metwithALCOAWORLDALUMINALLC executives
inLondon, NewYork,andelsewheretodiscussmattersrelating to the alumina supply
relationshipwithAlba.
9. Limited was a shell entity controlled by Consultant A andincorporated in theBritishVirgin Islands,withits purportedplacesofbusinessin Australia,
Guernsey,and Switzerland. Alumet had no legitimatebusinessoperations and no history in the
aluminabusiness. Alumet held banlcaccountsat the Royal Bank ofCanada("RBC") in
Switzerland and the Channel Islands.
AA Alumina and ChemicalsLtd. ("AAAC")was a shell entity controlled by
Consultant A and incorporated in theBritishVirginIslands,withits purportedplacesofbusiness
inAustralia,Guernsey,and Switzerland. AAAChad no legitimatebusinessoperations and no
history in the aluminabusiness. AAACheld bankaccountsat RBC in Switzerland and the
Channel Islands.
Consultant A held an account at RBCGuernseyin thenameofUnited Legal
Engineering Co.("ULECO"),a shell entity, that contained funds from, among othersources,the
purportedsalesof alumina toAlbaby Alumet andAAACon behalf ofAlcoaofAustralia,as
explained more fully in theparagraphsalleged below. Consultant Asometimesuseda ULECO
bank account to wire money directly orindirectlytoaccountsbeneficially owned by officials of
the Kingdom of Bahrain.
4
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
36/52
Consultant Aalsomaintained a bankaccountat HSBC in Luxembourgunderthe
nameofanothershell company, La Consultant A would wire money toOfficial Cthrough thataccountfromULECO'saccountat RBCGuernsey.
RelevantEntities and Foreign Officials in Bahrain
13. AluminiumBahrain B.S.C. ("Alba") was an aluminiumsmelteroperating in
Bahrain. Thestateholding company of the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Mumtalakat, which was
controlled by the MinistryofFinance, held 77percentofthe sharesofAlba. The Saudi Basic
Industries Corporation("SABIC"),which was and controlled by the governmentofthe Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, held a 20percentminoritystakeinAlba,andthreepercentof
Alba'sshareswere held by a German investment group. The ofprofitsearnedby Albabelonged to the Mumtalakat, though partoftheprofitwas permitted to beusedby Alba for its
operations. TheMinistryofFinancehad toapproveanychangein Alba's capital structure and
had to be consulted on any major capital projects orcontractsmaterial to Alba's operations.
Members Royal Family of Bahrain andrepresentativesof the government sat on the BoardofDirectors ofAlba,controlled its Board, and had primary authority in selecting its chief
executive officer and chief financial officer. Accordingly,Alba was an"agency"and
"instrumentality" o f the Government of Bahrain and Alba's directors, officers andemployees
were "foreign officials"withinthe meaning ofthe FCPA,Title UnitedSatesCode, Section78dd-2(h)(2)(A).
14. OfficialA was amemberof Royal Family andservedas amemberofthe board of directors ofAlbafrom 1982 to 1997. From 1988 to 1990,OfficialA wasalsoa
memberofAlba'stendercommittee, which wasresponsiblein part for awarding contractsto Alba's suppliers, suchas Alcoa entities supplying alumina to Alba. As an officer ofAlba,
5
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
37/52
OfficialA was a "foreignofficial" withinthe meaningofthe FCPA,Title UnitedStatesCode, Section78dd-2(h)(2)(A).
OfficialB served on Alba's boardfrom atleast1986 to 2000 as a representative
of SABIC. From 1988 to 1990,OfficialBalsoserved on Alba'stendercommittee with Official
A. As anofficer ofAlba,OfficialB was a "foreignofficial" withinthe meaningofthe FCPA,
Title UnitedStatesCode, Section78dd-2(h)(2)(A).16. OfficialC was a senior member of Bahrain's RoyalFamily,a senior government
official ofBahrainfrom atleast1995 to 2005, and served as ahigh-rankingofficer ofAlba from
to 2005. As ahigh-rankingofficer ofAlba,OfficialC was extremelyinfluentialover the
assignment of contracts to Alba's suppliers. Official C relied on Consultant A toassisthimin
opening international bankaccountsusing variousaliasesor shell entities for thepurposeof
receivingcorrupt funds fromkickbacksfromAlba's suppliers. As anofficer ofAlbaand a
senior governmentofficial, Official C was a "foreignofficial" withinthe meaning FCPA,Title UnitedStatesCode, Section78dd-2(h)(2)(A).
THE CORRUPTION SCHEMEIN BAHRAIN
Background
17. From 1989 to approximately 1996,AlcoaofAustraliamanaged its long term
supplyrelationshipwithAlba. As partofthatrelationship,AlcoaofAustraliaretained
Consultant A toassistin long-term contract negotiationswithAlbaandBahrainigovernment
officials. By 2000, whenALCOAWORLDALUMINALLCassumeddirect oversightofthe
Albarelationship,Consultant A was playing a significant role in the relationship betweenAlcoa
ofAustraliaandAlba. Executive A, who inherited theAlbaoversight relationship as partofhis
6
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
38/52
duties atALCOAWORLDALUMINALLC,becamethe primary liaisonwithConsultant A
regarding theAlbarelationship.
Overview
In or around 2002,ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC,through Executive A,
causedAlcoa ofAustraliatoenterinto a purported distributorship for thesaleof approximately
onemilliontonsof alumina annually toAlbathrough Consultant A's shell companies, Alumet
and AAAC.
In or around 2004,ALCOAWORLDALUMIN A LLC,through Executive A,
coordinated anotherpurported distributionagreementthat involvedthesaleof up to 1.78 million
tonsof alumina toAlbaeveryyearthrough Alumet andAAAC. This corruptarrangementlasted
through on or about December 2009.20. As partofthe 2002 and 2004 purported distributorshipagreements,Consultant A
imposed a mark-up on andAAAC'spurportedsalesof alumina toAlbaandusedthemark-up fromthosesalesto enrich himself and pay bribes to senior government officials of
Bahrain. ALCOAWORLDALUMIN A LLC,through Executive A, consciously disregarded the
fact that Consultant A would pay bribes to senior government officials fromthe mark-up on
aluminasalestoAlba.
/. ALCOA WORLDAL LLC, throughExecutive A, EnlargedConsultantA's Role in the AluminaSupplyRelationship
By 2000, Executive A, who was thenbasedin WORLD ALUMINALLC'soffices in Pittsburgh, hadassumeddirect responsibility for managing theAlba
relationship.
7
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
39/52
22. FromAprilto December 2001,Executive A took aseriesofstepstocauseAlumet
andAAACtobecomeAlcoa of Australia's purported distributors for all ofitssalesof alumina to
Alba.
23. On or aboutApril 12, Executive A wrote toOfficial C to advise him that"Alcoawishes" to extend the"presentsupply contract [withAlba]forthreeyearsto December
24. On or around August after receiving arequestfromAlbato continue theexistingsupplyarrangementsthrough December 2003, Executive A facilitated Alba's entering
intoan extensionofthe existing alumina supply arrangement through December 2003.
25. On or about February 2002, Executive AcausedAlcoa ofAustraliatoenterintoa purporteddistributionagreementwithAlumetandAAACfor the supply of approximately
onemilliontons of alumina intended forsaletoAlba.
26. Executive A knew that Alcoa ofAustraliawouldcontinue to ship alumina directly
toAlba. Executive A consciously disregarded the fact that the purported contractual
arrangement he craftedwithConsultant AwouldpermitAlumetand/or AAACto mark-upsales
toAlbaof aluminafromAlcoa ofAustralia. In or around February 2002, Alcoa ofAustralia
ceasedto invoiceAlbadirectly for shipments o f alumina.
TheMark-Up and CommissionPaymentsFrom2002Through2004
27. From 2002 to 2004, Executive A, acting on behalf ofALCOA WORLD
ALUMINA LLC,causedAAACto receive inexcessof $79millionin mark-ups on alumina
salestoAlba.
28. AAACalsoreceived a commission under the terms of the 2002distribution
agreement. The purported 2002distributionagreementprovided for a commission of of
8
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
40/52
allpaymentsmadebyAAACtoAlcoaofAustraliafor alumina. From 2002 to 2004,Alcoaof
AustraliapaidAAACa commission of $493,509.
ConsultantAChanneled CorruptPaymentsto Government Officials
From2002through2004
29. From 2002 through 2004, Consultant Amadecorrupt payments toOfficialsB and
Cfrombankaccountsat RBC in Guernsey heldinthenameofAlumetandULECO.
II. Executive A Retained ConsultantA For
Joint VentureNegotiations betweenAlcoa andAlba
30. In 2002,Alcoawas attempting to negotiate ajointventurewithAlba,inwhich
AlcoawouldsupplyAlbawithaluminafromtheAWACsystem'ssmelters, and, inexchange,
AlbawouldsupplyAlcoawithaluminium. Executive A participated in the negotiations for
Alcoaand retained Consultant A toprivatelylobbyOfficial C on behalf of Alcoa'sposition. On
oraboutApril27, 2002, Executive AcausedAlcoatoentera consultingagreementwith
Consultant A pursuant towhichConsultant Awouldreceive an $8million"successfee"based
onlimitedspecified negotiation "advice andassistancetoAlcoa" i fthejointventure were
successful.
As part of the negotiations, Executive A proposedajointventure structure that
contemplated supplying alumina toAlbathrough adistributor.
32. On or about March 26, 2003, an in-house attorney in Alcoa's legal department
sentan email asking Executive A toexplainthe role of thedistributor. On or aboutMarch27,
2003, Executive A responded that"[t]heDistributorshiprol[e]is something the Bahrain
Government wants" and thatAlcoa"shouldn't get tooinvolvedwithhow theDistributorand the
Government interact. We are currentlysellingthe alumna we supply toAlbathrough a
9
\
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
41/52
Distributor." Inresponse,the in-house attorney wrote that "wewi l lneedto understand the
Distributor's role completely . . . for Foreign Corrupt Practice Actpurposes."
OnSeptember 2003, Alcoa andAlbaagreedto a Memorandum ofUnderstanding ("MOU") outliningan equity investment by Alcoa inAlbaandprovidingfor
alumina to be sold to the Government of Bahrain, as majorityshareholderofAlba,"directly or
through anassociatedcompany ofAlcoasatisfactory to GoB [Government of Bahrain] and
Alcoa." TheMOUwas approved byOfficial C on behalfofAlba. However, thejointventure
negotiations fellthrough, and Consultant A wasneverpaid the $8millionsuccessfee.
34. Within 17daysofthe signingoftheMOU,Consultant A transferred $2millionto
Official C's account atDeutscheBank inGeneva,Switzerland,from aULECObank account at
RBCinGuernsey.
III. ALCOA WORLDALUMINA LLC, Through Executive A, Alcoa ofAustraliato Secure a2005Long-Term AluminaSupplyDealwithAlba
By the summer of2004,Alcoa ofAustraliawas supplying approximately one
millionmetrictonsof alumina annually toAlba,but wasinvoicing Alba indirectlythrough
Consultant A's companies. Alba's obligationsunderpre-existing supply arrangementswith
AlcoaofAustraliawere set to expire at the end of 2004.
36. In the summer of 2004, Executive A and one ofhis supervisors, anothersenior
member ofALCOAWORLDALUMINALLC's global aluminasalesdepartment, sought to
securea new long term alumina supplyagreementwithAlba. On or around August 5, 2004,
Executive A and his supervisor were advised by a former senior Alcoa executive who had a
relationshipwithConsultant A that i f they attempted to negotiate a direct contractual relationship
between Alcoa ofAustraliaandAlba,rather than negotiate a supplyarrangementthrough
10
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
42/52
Consultant A and one ofhis companies, someor all ofAlba'sbusinesscould be lost to another
aluminasupplier.
On or about August 2004, Executive A and his supervisor metwithConsultant A at Consultant A's LondonOffice todiscussusing Consultant A's companies "as
Alcoa's exclusive distributorinthe region."
On or about August 22, 2004, Executive Asentan email to his supervisor
documentingwithmore specificity certain items that werediscussedat the meeting. Among
them, Executive A noted that"[w]e agreedto supply [ConsultantA] withpricingindications for
supply to [AAAC]by 8/24 so he canhavethesefor his meeting [inBahrain]with [OfficialC].
We mentionedpricingclose to 14%." Executive A's emailalsonoted that"[Official C] is
holdingon to publishing[Alba's]aluminatender[to the market]untilhe has further discussions
with [ConsultantA ]on 8/29." Thepricingterms per metric ton of alumina that Executive A
quoted to Consultant A at the meeting in London werelessthan thepricingterms forAlbathat
Executive A had quoted toOfficial C approximately one month earlier.
On or aroundSeptember29, 2004, Executive A facilitated s tendering abidto supplyAlbaup to milliontons of alumina for tenyearscommencing in 2005.
40. On or about October 8, 2004, Attorney 1, the in-house attorney responsible for
supporting the aluminabusiness, suggestedterminating the consultingagreementthat Alcoa had
entered withConsultantA,as "the terms of [ConsultantA's] currentengagementcreated a lot of
anxiety in the organization." Executive A advised that the consultancyagreementshould not be
terminateduntilAlcoa hadsecureda new long-term alumina supplyagreementwithAlba.
On or about Official CcausedAlbatoaccept stenderofferfor aten-yearsupply of alumina.
11
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
43/52
42. On or about December 2004, Executive AcausedAlcoaofAustraliatoenterapurportedten-yeardistributorshipagreementwithAlumetandAAAC to purportedly supply
themwithup to milliontonsof alumina forsaletoAlbafrom2005to 2014. From2005to2009, the price term was 13.9% ofLMEminus$0.25per ton of alumina. From 2010 to 2014,
the pricedecreasedto ofLMEminus$0.25per ton of alumina. Executive A consciouslydisregarded the fact that Alcoa ofAustraliawould continue to supply alumina directly toAlba
that was purportedly being "distributed" through Alumet and AAAC.
On or about March 4, 2005, arepresentativeof Consultant Asentthe CEO of
Albaafinal,unexecuted contract for the purported supplyagreementbetween AAACandAlba.
44. On or aboutJune8, 2005, the finalagreementnegotiated between AAAC and
Albawas signed by Alba's CEO on behalfofAlba. Theagreement'seffectivedatewasJanuary
1,2005, and its term was through December 2014. Theagreementprovided that AAACwouldsupplyAlbawith 1.508 millionmetrictonsof alumina in 2005, and 1.6 millionmetric
tonsof alumina thereafter foreachremaining contractyear. From2005to 2009, the price
formula in theagreementresulted in anaverageprice toAlbaof 14.98% ofLMEper metric ton
ofalumina. From through the price formula in theagreementresulted in anaverageprice toAlbaof 14.42 % ofLMEper metric ton of alumina. Albawas required tobearthecost
ofshipping and insurance.
ConsultantA's Mark-up on Alumina Sales From2005to2009
As a result ofALCOAWORLDALUMINA
s conduct, through Executive
A, from2005through 2009, Alumet andAAACreceived inexcessof $188millionon theup of aluminasalestoAlba. This money was transferred from the initialaccountsinwhich
12
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
44/52
paymentfromAlbawas received through various bank accounts controlledby Consultant A,
includingaccounts in thenameofshellentitiesAlumetandULECOat RBC in Guernsey.
Additional CorruptPaymentsto Official C
46. From 2005 through 2006, Consultant Amademillionsin corrupt payments from
the account ofULECOat RBC in Guernsey through the account ofLaFoscainLuxembourgto
accounts that were beneficially owned byOfficialC under clientcodenamesatABN AMRO
BankinLuxembourgandLGTBank in Liechtenstein.
47. Underthesecircumstances, ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC,through
Executive A, consciously disregarded the fact that the mark-up imposed by Consultant A on
AlumetandAAAC'ssalesofaluminatoAlbawas facilitatingcorrupt payments to government
whocontrolledAlba's tenderprocess.
IV. ALCOA WORLDALUMINALLC Caused Alcoa to ExtendMaterially
Significant LinesofCredit to ConsultantA
48. Consultant A sought alineofcreditfromAlcoato cover the cost ofalumina
shipments toAlbauntilAlbaremitted payment toAlumetandAAAC. ConsultantA,however,
refused to provide financialstatementsforAlumetorAAAC to Alcoa's credit department, which
wasnormallyrequired for a significant extension ofcreditto athird-party. Notwithstandingthis,
inor around December 2004,ALCOAWORLDALUMINA LLC,through ExecutiveA, sought
and received approval to extend credit to Consultant A's companies and therebycausedAlcoa's
creditdepartment to extend a $23millionlineofcredittoAlumetandAAAC.
49. Thereafter, ineachof contractyears2005 through 2009,Alcoacontinued to grant
businessunitoverrides to extendmateriallyincreasing credit lines to Consultant A's purported
distributorships. By 2007,Alcoawas extending a creditlineof$58milliontoAlumetand
13
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
45/52
AAAC. During this period, Alcoa granted Alumet andAAAC credit lines that were significantly
greaterthanthosegranted by Alcoa to any other third-party.
50. Byfacilitatingthe extension of credit to ConsultantA,Executive A enabled the
purported distributorshipschemebyallowingConsultant A to defer paying Alcoa ofAustralia
forthemulti-milliondollar shipments of alumina toAlbauntilAlumet andAAAC received
payment from Alba.
14
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
46/52
E X H I B I T 4
CO RPO RATE CO MPLIANCE PRO G R AM
Inorder toaddressany deficiencies in its internal controls, compliance code, policies,
and procedures regarding compliancewiththe Foreign Corrupt Practices ActU.S.C.78dd-l, and other applicableanti-corruptionlaws,AFCOA INC. (the"Company")agreesto continue to conduct, in a manner consistent with all ofits obligations
under this Agreement, appropriate reviews ofits existing internal controls, policies, and
procedures.
Wherenecessaryand appropriate, the Companyagreesto adopt new or to modify
existinginternal controls, compliance code, policies, and procedures in order toensurethat it
maintains: (a) a system ofinternalaccounting controls designed toensurethat the Company
makesandkeepsfairandaccuratebooks, records, and accounts; and (b) a rigorousanti-
corruptioncompliance program that includes policies and procedures designed to detect and
deter violationsofthe FCPA and other applicableanti-corruptionlaws. At aminimum,this
should include, but not belimitedto, thefollowingelements to the extent they are notaheady
partof the Company's existing internal controls, compliance code, policies, and procedures:
Commitment
The Companywil lensurethat its directors and senior management provide
strong,explicit,andvisiblesupport and commitment to its corporatepolicyagainstviolationsof
theanti-corruptionlaws and its compliance code.
Policies and Procedures
2. The Company wil ldevelop and promulgate a clearly articulated and visible
corporate policyagainstviolationsofthe FCPA and other applicable foreign law counterparts
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
47/52
(collectively,the"anti-corruption laws,"),which policyshall bememorializedin awritten
compliance code.
The Companywil ldevelop and promulgate compliance policies and procedures
designed to reduce the prospect ofviolations anti-corruptionlaws and the Company'scompliance code, and the Companywi l ltake appropriatemeasurestoencourageand support the
observanceof ethics and compliance policies and procedures againstviolation anti-corruptionlaws by personnel ata ll levelsofthe Company. Theseanti-corruptionpoliciesand
procedures shall apply to all directors, and employees and, wherenecessaryandappropriate, outside parties acting on behalfof the Company in aforeignjurisdiction,including
but notlimited to, agentsand intermediaries, consultants, representatives, distributors,teaming
partners, contractors and suppliers, consortia, andjointventure partners(collectively,"agents
andbusinesspartners"). The Company shallnotify allemployees that compliancewiththe
policiesand procedures is the duty ofindividualsata ll levelso f the company. Suchpoliciesand
procedures shalladdress:
a. gifts;
b. hospitality,entertainment, andexpenses;
c. customer travel;
d. politicalcontributions;
e. charitable donations and sponsorships;
f. facilitationpayments; and
g. solicitationandextortion.
4. The Companywil l ensurethat it has a system offinancialand accounting
procedures, includinga system ofinternalcontrols, reasonably designed toensurethe
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
48/52
maintenanceoffair andaccuratebooks, records, andaccounts. This system should be designed
to providereasonableassurancesthat:
a. transactionsare executed inaccordancewithmanagement'sgeneral or
specific authorization;
b. transactionsare recorded asnecessaryto permit preparation of financial
in conformitywithgenerallyacceptedaccounting principles or any other criteria
applicable to suchstatements,and to maintain accountability forassets;
c. accesstoassetsis permitted only inaccordancewithmanagement's
general or specific authorization; and
d. the recorded accountability forassetsis compared withthe existingassets
atreasonableintervals and appropriate action is takenwithrespectto any differences.
Periodic Risk-Based Review
5. The Company wi l l developthesecompliance policies andprocedureson the
basisof a periodic riskassessmentaddressingthe individualcircumstances Company, inparticular the foreign bribery risks facing the Company,including,but notlimitedto, its
geographical organization, interactionswithvarioustypesand levels of government officials,
industrialsectorsof operation, involvementinjointventure arrangements, importance oflicenses
and permits inthe Company's operations, degreeof governmental oversight and inspection, and
volume and importance ofgoodsand personnel clearing throughcustomsand immigration.
6. The Company shall review its anti-corruption compliance policies and
proceduresnolessthan annually andupdatethem as appropriate toensuretheir continued
effectiveness, taking into account relevant developments in thefieldand evolving international
and industrystandards.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
49/52
Proper Oversight andIndependence
7. The Company will assignresponsibilityto one or more senior corporate
executives of the Company for the implementation and oversightofthe Company's anti-
corruptioncompliance code, policies, and procedures. Such corporate shallhavetheauthorityto reportdirectlyto independent monitoringbodies,includinginternal audit, the
Company's Board ofDirectors,or any appropriate committee of the Board ofDirectors,and
shallhaveanadequatelevelof autonomyfrommanagement aswellas sufficientresourcesand
authorityto maintain such autonomy.
Training andGuidance
8. The Companywil limplement mechanisms designed toensurethat itsanti-
corruptioncompliance code, policies, and procedures are effectively communicated to all
directors, officers, employees, and, wherenecessaryand appropriate,agentsandbusiness
partners. Thesemechanisms shallinclude:(a) periodictrainingfor all directors and officers, all
employees in positions of leadership or trust, positions that require suchtraining(e.g., internal
audit,sales,legal, compliance, finance), or positions that otherwiseposeacorruptionriskto the
Company, and, wherenecessaryand appropriate,agentsandbusinesspartners; and (b)
corresponding certifications by all such directors, officers, employees,agents,andbusiness
partners, certifying compliancewiththetraining requirements.
9. The Companywil lmaintain,or wherenecessaryestablish, an effective system
for providingguidance and advice to directors, officers, employees, and, wherenecessaryand
appropriate,agentsandbusinesspartners, oncomplyingwiththe Company's anti-corruption
compliance code, policies, and procedures, includingwhen they need advice on an urgentbasis
or in anyforeignjurisdictioninwhichthe Companyoperates.
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
50/52
Internal Reporting and Investigation
The Companywillmaintain,or wherenecessaryestablish, an effective system
for internal and, where possible, confidential reporting by, and protection of, directors, officers,
employees, and, where appropriate,agentsandbusinesspartners concerningviolationsanti-corruptionlaws or the Company'santi-corruptioncompliance code, policies, and
procedures.
The Companywillmaintain,or wherenecessaryestablish, an effective and
reliableprocesswithsufficientresourcesfor responding to, investigating, and documenting
allegations ofviolationsof theanti-corruptionlaws or the Company's anti-corruption
compliance code, policies, and procedures.
Enforcement and Discipline
The Company willimplement mechanisms designed to effectively enforce its
compliance code, policies, and procedures, includingappropriately compliance anddiscipliningviolations.
The Companywillinstitute appropriate disciplinaryprocedures toaddress,
among other things,violationsoftheanti-corruptionlaws and the Company's anti-corruption
compliance code, policies, and procedures by the Company's directors, officers, and employees.
Such procedures should be applied consistently andfairly, regardlesso f thepositionheld by, or
perceived importance of, the director,officer,or employee. The Company shall implement
procedures toensurethat where misconduct is discovered,reasonablestepsare taken to remedy
the harm resultingfromsuch misconduct, and toensurethat appropriatestepsare taken to
prevent furthersimilarmisconduct, includingassessingthe internal controls, compliance code,
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
51/52
policies,and procedures andmaking modificationsnecessarytoensuretheoverallanti-
corruptioncompliance program is effective.
Third-PartyRelationships
14. The Companywil l instituteappropriate risk-based due diligence and compliance
requirements pertaining to the retention and oversight ofall agentsandbusinesspartners,
including:
a. properly documented duediligence pertainingto thehiringand
appropriate and regular oversight ofagentsandbusinesspartners;
b. informingagentsandbusinesspartners of the Company'scommitmentto
abidingbyanti-corruptionlaws, ando fthe Company'santi-corruptioncompliance code,
policies,and procedures; and
c. seeking areciprocalcommitmentfromagentsandbusinesspartners.
Wherenecessaryand appropriate, the Companywil l include standard provisions
inagreements, contracts, and renewals thereofwith allagentsandbusinesspartners that are
reasonably calculated to preventviolationsof theanti-corruptionlaws,whichmay, depending
uponthe circumstances, include: (a)anti-corruptionrepresentations and undertakingsrelatingto
compliancewiththeanti-corruptionlaws;(b) rights to conduct audits of the books and records of
the agent orbusinesspartner toensurecompliancewiththe foregoing; and (c) rights to terminate
an agent orbusinesspartner as a result of any breach oftheanti-corruptionlaws, the Company's
compliance code,policies,or procedures, or the representations and undertakings related to such
matters.
Mergers and Acquisitions
-
7/27/2019 U.S. v. Alcoa World Alumina (Plea Agreement)
52/52
The Companywil ldevelop and implement policies and procedures for mergers
and acquisitionsrequiringthat the Company conduct appropriate risk-based due diligence on
potentialnewbusinessentities,includingappropriate FCPA andanti-corruptiondue diligence by
legal,accounting, and compliance personnel.
The Companywil lensurethat the Company's compliance code, policies, and
procedures regarding theanti-corruptionlaws apply asquicklyas is practicable to newly
acquiredbusinessesor entities mergedwiththe Company andwil lpromptly:
a. trainthe directors, officers, employees,agents,andbusinesspartners
consistentwithParagraph 8 above on theanti-corruptionlaws and the Company's compliance
code, policies, and procedures regardinganti-corruptionlaws; and
b. where warranted, conduct an audit ofallnewly acquiredormergedbusinessesasquicklyas practicable.
Monitoring and Testing
The Companywil l conduct periodic reviews and testing ofitsanti-corruption
compliance code, policies, and procedures designed to evaluate and improve their effectiveness
inpreventing and detectingviolationsofanti-corruptionlaws and the Company'santi-corruption
compliance code, policies, and procedures, taking into account relevant developments inthe field
andevolvinginternational and industrystandards.