urban farm acology the urban political ecology of hackney city farm

20
Payne 2010 Urban Farm-acology The Urban Political Ecology of Hackney City Farm Initial Establishment Hackney City Farm, image from Hackney City Farm Website SO 452 Urban Environments, Lent Term 2010 Alexandra Payne

Upload: emugaia

Post on 15-Nov-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Urban Agriculture

TRANSCRIPT

  • Payne2010

    Urban Farm-acology The Urban Political Ecology of Hackney City Farm

    InitialEstablishmentHackneyCityFarm,imagefromHackneyCityFarmWebsite SO 452 Urban Environments, Lent Term 2010 Alexandra Payne

  • 2

    TheUrbanenvironmentisarelationalconcept,withnecessarilysubjectiveandmoralvaluesattachedtoitscreation.Urbanpoliticalecology(UPE)isaframeworkthatcanbeusedtoexplorethesevaluesandexplainthemetabolismsbetweenhumanbeingsandtheurbanenvironmenttheycreateandlivein.(Heynenetal.,2006)UPElooksatthepoliticalandsocialrelationsthatgoverntherighttothecityandtherightofaccesstoproductivenaturalspaces.Inthiswayitisalsoanexaminationofthevaluesthatgointoourcreationofnatureandthevaluesthatgetbuiltintoourphysicalspaces.ThisessaywilluseanUrbanPoliticalEcologyframeworktoexplorethesocial,economic,politicalandspatialprocessesthatcametogethertoformthesocionatureofHackneyCityFarm,andthewayinwhichtheserelationshipscontinuetoshapethefarmanditsmeaningforthesurroundingcommunity.Historicallythenaturalhasbeenincreasinglyremovedfromtheurbanandthroughthisprocessincreasinglycontrolledbytherich.Hackneycanbeseenasaplacethatexemplifiesthisseparation,aplacewhereunevengeographicdevelopmenthasgivenwaytosocialandhealthinequalities.InconclusionIwillinvestigateHackneyCityFarm,acommunityrunfarminoneofthemostdeprivedboroughsofLondon,asapotentialremedyforsomeofthesocialailmentscreatedbythisseparation.AsoneoftheremaininglocationsinoneofthepoorestboroughsofLondonwhereresidentsoflowsocioeconomicstatushavetheopportunitytointeractwithnatureasagricultural/gardeningland,itspresencepresentsafarmacologyaspaceforhealingtheriftthathasbeencreatedbetweennatureandsociety,betweentheurbansecondnatureandnatureasmanhasimagineditinthepast.Harveyhaspointedoutthatinourcreationofhumandomains,itishardtoseewheresocietybeginsandnatureends.(Harvey,1993,p.31;28)Whatwecreatethroughourhumansocialprocessesisinherentlynaturalinthatitisaculturalrepresentationofoursociety,andthisprocessinevitablyleadstoablurringofthedistinctionsbetweentheurbanandnaturalworld.However,inLondon,thehistoricalsociopoliticalprocessesthathavemoldedthecityintoits

  • 3

    modernglobalformhavecreatedanurbanenvironmentwherethenaturalintheformofproductivelandisincreasinglyremovedfromandcrowdedoutratherthanblendedwithit.Recently,anumberoffactors,includinganincreasingpopulationandlandvalues(HackneyCouncil,2006;2007)anddecreasesinpubliclyavailablelandhavecreatedasituationinHackneywherenaturespecificallyaccesstoopenspace,andareasforgardening/growingfreshfoods,andtheotherhealthbenefitsattachedtoopenspaces(consumptionofnutritiousfoods,mentalandpsychologicalwellbeing)hasbecomeincreasinglylimitedforresidentsoflowersocioeconomicstatus.Thesocioeconomicconstructionofthecityhasturnednatureintoacommodity,nolongerapublicgoodavailableforeveryone,essentiallyprivatizingthecommons.HencetheunevengeographicdevelopmentbecameaphysicalmanifestationofsocialinequalitiesInanydiscussionofmansrelationtonatureintheformofproductivelandtheheartofthediscussionnecessarilycentersononefundamentalfacthumanbeingsmusteattolive,withoutsufficientfood,andsufficientlynutritiousfoodhumanscannotsurvive.Thereforethemostimmediatevalueofanyformofproductivelandisinitsabilitytosustainhumanlife.Humanbodiesareproducedandreproducedthroughsociometabolicprocessesthatlinktheirexistencetoexternalprocessesthatproducefood.Thesamesociometabolicprocessesthatarethemselvesconstitutedthroughrelationsofsocialandpoliticalpowerthroughawideassortmentofculturalmeanings.(Heynen,2006,p.129)The2006MayorsFoodStrategyforLondonshowedthatalthoughLondonersbenefitfromtheavailabilityofacomplexfoodnetworkthatsupportstheimmensefoodneedsofthegrowingcity,theseneedsaremetunevenly,especiallyinlowerincomeneighbourhoodandinmanypartsofLondonpeoplestruggletoaccessaffordable,nutritiousfood.(MayorofLondon,2006,p.3)Thesestrugglesthenresultintheunevenexperienceofillhealthamongdifferentsocioeconomicclasses

  • 4

    andethnicities.ThishasbeenhighlightedbybothGarrets2005casestudyofLondon,andthemorerecent2009reportATaleofTwoObescities(acollaborativeeffortbetweenLondonandNewYorkUniversities).Bothsetsofresearchfoundthatnutritionrelatedillhealthforexample,obesity,diabetes,mentaldistressandillness,andhungerwasmorelikelytobesufferedbyethnicminorities,thepoorandthedisadvantagedlivinginhighlydeprivedareasofcitieswherehealthyfoodisoftenneitheraccessiblenoraffordableandphysicalinteractionwithnatureisconstrained.(Freudenbergetal.,2009;Garnett,2005)Heynenhaspointedoutthat,historicallythequantity,qualityandvarietyoffoodpeoplehaveeatenhavebeendeterminedbytheirplaceintheireconomyandtheinstitutionalstructuresinplacewithinthoseeconomiestoproduceanddistributefood.(Heynen,2006,p.124)TheFoodStrategyalsomadethisconnectionnotingthatthosewithlowersocioeconomicstatuswerelesslikelytoliveincloseproximitytohealthylocalfoodsources.Therefore,improvingLondonershealthandreducinghealthinequalitiesdependsonincreasingsupportforlocalproducers,andtherebyensuringasecureandsafelocalfoodsupplyforthedeprived.(MayorofLondon,2006)ConnectedwiththisideaisMarxsunderstandingofsocietyandhumanhistoryasaproductionofmanslabour.HeexplainsthatMenmustbeinapositiontoliveinordertobeabletomakehistoryThefirsthistoricalactisthustheproductionofthemeanstosatisfytheseneeds,theproductionofmateriallifeitself.(MarxinSwyngedouw,2006,p.24)Itfollowsthen,thathewhocontrolsthemeansofproducinglife(productiveland)controlstheproductionofhistory,andalsothefurtherdevelopmentoftheurbanlandscape.Separationfromthelandisthereforedetrimentaltoanindividualsimmediatehealth,butalsoaffectstheirfutureabilitytointeractandprocessspaceinamannerofoneschoosing.Furthermore,ourunderstandingofthehumanbiologicalprocessesofmetabolizingfoodgoeshandinhandwiththeirinteractionwithproductivespaces.AsMichelleObama,JamieOliver,andawholeotherlonglistofpoliticalfiguresandrestauranteurs

  • 5

    cumfoodpioneershavenotedinthefightagainstbothfoodpovertyandobesityamongschoolchildreninboththeUSandEngland.Asaresult,thoseinlowerincomeneighbourhoods,cannotidentifynaturalfoods,tellthedifferencebetweenvegetablesanddonotknowwheretheirfoodcomesfromorhowitgrows.Inthiswaywecanseethatthevalueofconnectiontoproductivelandgoesbeyondtheimmediatenecessityoffoodtotheseparationofanunderstandingoftheimportanceandvalueofthatfoodandthemeansofconnectingwiththisresource.AHistoricalSeparationofProductiveLandfromthePoorTounderstandhowthedisadvantagedofHackneycametobeexcludedfromnatureitisimportanttounderstandthattherearehistoricallyspecificdimensionsto[any]urbanexperience(Gandy,2006,p64.)andthatthesesociopoliticalhistoriesarebasedonspecificvalues.Gandypointsoutthat,natureisevokedasanideologicalandmetaphoricalschemafortheinterpretationofreality(Gandy,2006,p.65).Inmodernhistory,thecityhasbeenpittedagainstnaturewiththelatterbeingviewedinstrumentallyasasetofrawmaterialstoaidinmansprogress.(Barry,1999)Duringtheindustrialera,withtheintensificationofcapitalism,naturewasastoreofrawmaterialsforhumaneconomicpurposesandthismeantthatthosewhocontrolledithadtherighttoitsexploitationfortheirproductiveneeds.Whennaturebecamenothingmorethanatoolformansprofitandmanipulationitledtoadisregardforthedestructionofnature,whichinturncausedcitiestobecomeincreasinglypolluted.Citieswereperceivedtoresideoutsidethenaturalorder(Gandy,2006,p.64)incontrasttothepurityofthecountryside.Thusthecitybecamesecondnature,somethingseparateandasidefromthedirtonwhichthecitywasbuilt.(Barry,1999)ThisvaluecanbeseeninAbercrombies1940planforLondonscontinuedurbandevelopmentwhichrestricteddevelopmentwithinagreenbelt(Thomas,1963)tokeeptheurbanfromencroachingonnature,butalsohadtheeffectoflimitingaccesstothisspacetothosewithprivatetransportation.Withinthecity,naturewasalsotobeprotected.Itwasrelegatedto

  • 6

    appropriateandorderlyspacesparksandallotmentstowhichaccesswaslimited.Inthisway,landwithproductivevaluewascutofffromfreepublicaccess.GardenCityplannerssuchasEbenezerHowardunintentionallyreinforcedthisseparationofthepoorfromnaturewiththecreationofpristineneighbourhoodsbuiltinsuburbanareas.Althoughplannedforthepoor,theseareaswerealsoplannedaroundprivatetransportandasaresultwerecooptedbytheupperclasses,furtherconfiningthepoortotheinnercity.AsEngelspointedout,powerliesinthehandsofthosewhoown,directlyorindirectly,thefoodstuffsandmeanstoproduction.(Heynen,2006,p.134)Alongwiththisseparationofmanandnature,cametheseparationofnatureasameansofproductionfromcertainclasses.ThesesociopoliticalhistorieshadtheeffectofrestrictinggardenuseandurbanlandcultivationtowealthierclassesbylimitingaccesstoalargepartofLondonsgreenspacetothosewithprivatetransportation,privategardens,oraccesstogovernmentlicensedallotments.DomeneandSaurinotedanimportanttensionbetweencitiesincreasingenvironmentalism,thepromotionofgreenidealsandsocialjusticeissuessuchastheprovisionofgardeningareasfortheunderclassesandtheneedforurbangrowth.Theyarguethatvegetablegardenscomplywiththesustainabilitygoalsthatmanycitiesandtownsarecurrentlypursuingaroundtheworldandthereforebecomeprotectedandencouraged.[However],theymayposeobstaclestothesteadyadvanceofurbanizationandareerasedfromthecitylandscapes.(Domene&Sauri,2007,p.288)Theyseetheseproductivespacesasscenariosofconflictbetweendifferentsocialgroupsvyingforcontroloftheurbanenvironment.TheseconflictsofclassinterestarealsovisibleinLondon.Allotmentswereoriginallydevisedtocompensatethepoorfortheprivatizationofthecommons(thedesireofthewealthytohavemoreformalcontroloftheirproperty).Thisproductivelandwasformallyprotectedin1908bytheAllotmentActofParliament(Thompson,2007;Garnett2005),whichformallysetasidelandforthepoorwhocouldnotaffordspaceforgrowingfood.It

  • 7

    wasrecognizedthatthereneededtobesufficientaccesstoproductivelandforthepoorandthisspacewasmeanttoremainproportionalaspopulationsgrew,withthesuggestioninthe1940sbeingthattherebeatleastfouracresofopenlandforeverythousandcityinhabitants.(Exploring20thCenturyLondon,n.d.)However,fromthe1950stothelate80stherewasadecreaseinavailableallotmentsduetodevelopmentdemandsonland(AllotmentVegetableGrowing,n.d.)andtheproportionofallotmentsinHackneylongerrepresentsenoughlandtosufficientlyservethepopulationinanequitableormeaningfulmanner.Whilethereareover30,000activeallotmentholdersinLondon,(Garnett2005)thereareonly124remainingallotmentplotsinHackney(HackneyCouncil,2008a),hometosome212,200people(Ibid.,2010)nowherenear4acresper1000people.WhileHackneyhasthehighestacreageofparksofanyLondonborough,itisalsooneofthelargestboroughsandhassomeofthelowestpercentagesofproductivespaceavailable.(SeeAppendix)IncreasingdemandforhousingandthegentrificationofmanyareasfurtherlimitedtheuseofurbangreenspaceinHackneytotherichandtheavailabilityofopencommonareasandcommunalgardeningareas.Thishasmeantthatthepoorsaccesstoproductivelandremainslimitedandthereforesodoestheiraccesstothementalandphysicalhealthbenefitsthislandembodies.TheConstructionofHackneysEnvironmentTraditionally,Hackneywasaworkingclassarea,anditremainsoneofthepoorestboroughsinLondon:ithasconsistentlybeenoneofthemostdeprivedboroughsinEngland,rankingsecondhighestin2007,withalmostallitswardsscoringinthe20%mostdeprivedofthecountry(SeeAppendix2).ItsresidentsconsistentlyhaveloweraverageincomesperhouseholdthanaverageLondoners;italsohasthehighestnumberofitsresidentsliveincouncilhousing.(Hackney

  • 8

    Council2008b,2009)WhilethoseinlowersocioeconomicgroupscontinuetoliveinHackney,ithasbeguntoattractamuchmoregentrifiedpopulationasGustavo,thefarmsEnvironmentalandEnterpriseManagerpointsout:IlivejustdowntheroadinTowerHamlets.Itsprettysimilarintermsofwealth;both[areas]areamongthemostdeprivedinLondon.TowerHamletsisquiteBangladeshi,[while]ethnicallyHackneyisveryTurkishandCaribbean.Theolderwhitecommunity,oldEastEnders,peoplewhoworkedinthefactoriesaremoreworkingclassHackneyhasprobablybenefitedmorefromgentrification.Whichisagoodthingandabadthing,uptoapointInterviewer:untilthecommunityhastomoveoutGustavo:whichhasstartedtohappenImeanthisareawasadump.Butnow[HegesturestowardsthegentrifiedmotherbabypairsintheCafspace](Payne,2010b)ThisGentrificationhasaffectedthepoorsaccesstoproductivegreenspaceintwoways.First,asaresultofchangesinpopulationandspeculation,housingpriceshaverisen184%inthelast10years.(HackneyCouncil2006;Nationwide,2009)Thishascausedhigherdemandforopenspacetobedevelopedandcreatedadisincentivefordeveloperstoincludegardens.Itisestimatedthatoverthelast5yearssome7,900acresofgardenandgreenspacewaslostinLondon,mostlyduetonewdevelopments(Smyth,2009,para.3).Second,housingunitsthatstillincludegardens,ornewerbuildingswithrooftopgardensincludedonpreviouslyopenspace,areoftentooexpensiveforlowerclassresidentsofHackneytoafford.ThesefactorshavedisproportionatelyaffectedHackneyspoorpopulations,resultinginanunintentionalenvironmentalclassism.AsDomeneandSaurihavepointedout,thekindoflandscapeswecreatearelinkedtowiderissuesofurbandevelopment,urbansustainability,andthesocialpreferencesforcertainurbannaturesoverothersinacontextofrapidurbangrowthandincreasingcompetitionforlandneithersocioenvironmentalchangesnorenvironmentalplanningaresociallyorecologicallyneutral.(Domene&Sauri,2007,p.288)

  • 9

    Inthiswaywecanalsoseethebeginningofabourgeoisieenvironmentalism,wheretherichvalueaccesstogardensandgreenspace,andhaveinfinitelymoreaccesstousingandshapingthesespacesthroughtheircontrolofcapital.ThiscanbeseeninLondon,wheretheaffluenthaveeasieraccesstolandoutsidethecity,alongwiththebuyingpowertoaffordhousingwithterracegardenswithinthecityandthechoicetoliveinapartmentswithrooftopgardensorothergardeningareas,thepoordonot.Althoughtherehasbeenafocusonrenewedsustainabilityandenvironmentalism,thegreeningofLondonhasyettotrulyaffectLondonspoor,especiallythoseinHackney.UrbanFarmingasAcologyHavingreviewedthemajorissuesthathaverestrictedtheaccessofthepoortogardeningandagriculturalspacesinLondon,itisimportanttopointoutanexception.InsouthHackney,attheheartoftwoofLondonspoorestboroughsandjustdowntheroadfromthelivelybustleofBroadwayMarketliesHackneyCityFarms.Onanygivendayyoucanseeaspacealivewithlocalparentsandtheirchildren,pettingtheanimalsandtakingclassesinthegarden;youngmotherswithstrollerscrowdingnoisilyintothecafrentedoutatthefrontofthepremise;childrenfromlocalschoolslearningaboutsustainabilityandgrowingfood;andvisitorsofallwalksoflifepoppingtheirheadsintoenjoythefruitsofanunlikelyurbanmetabolism.ThefarmitselfissurroundedbyoneofthemostdeprivedandunderresourcedinnercityareasintheUK,withhighlevelsofunemployment,manyyoungpeoplenotinschool[nor]employment,(Pounds,2007,p.6)andwheremanychildrenaresoremovedfromnaturethattheyhaveneverseenfarmanimals.Nordotheyknowwhattheirfoodlookslikeinitsnaturalform,orwhereitcomesfrom.(Payne,2009a)Thefarmslocationinthemidstofthisareahasmadeitavaluablecommunityresource;asortofFarmacology,aremedyforthesocialillsembodiedinthehistorically

  • 10

    constructedurbanenvironmentofHackney,whichseparatesethnicminoritiesandlowersocioeconomicclassesfromnatureintheformofproductivespacesandthereforefromnumerousformsofpersonalwellbeingAcologyisthescienceofremedies(Acology,n.d.)andthatispreciselywhaturbanfarmshavethepotentialtobe:specificsocionaturesthatcanaidinassuagingthesocialandphysicalailmentsofsociety.UrbanFarmingandgardeninghavelongbeenshowntoimproveindividualandcommunityhealthandwellbeing(Thompson,2007,p.162).IthasbeenshowninEnglandthatproximitytogardensandgreenspacesinthecitycanreducesocialandhealthinequalitiesandthaturbangreenspaceimprovesyourhealth.(Freudenbergetal.,2009;Smythe,2009;)However,inLondon,itisusuallythemostdeprivedpopulationswhohavetheleastaccesstospaceforgardeningandurbanfoodcultivationformeaningfulandproductiveinteractionwiththeland,whichbringsalongwithitsocialandhealthbenefits(bothphysicalandmental).Asnotedabovethehistoricseparationofmenfromnatureintheformofproductiveresourceshasledtoastateofphysicalandsocialdetriment.Urbanfarmsgavethepotentialtoremedytheseills.Thisideaseemstohavebeenpickedupinrecentyearsasmanycitiesacrosstheworldhavebegunfocusingonurbanagricultureasameansofreintroducingproductivenatureintourbanfooddesertsinimpoverishedareas.Londonhasrecentlybeguntofocusonhealthyeatingandlifestyles,andinthe2006FoodStrategyforLondontheMayorsofficehighlightedtheimportanceofeatingfreshfoodsandoutlinedtheneedtosupportopportunitiesforsmallscalefoodproductionforindividualsandcommunities(MayorofLondon)inordertobringhealthyfoodbackintotheurbanlandscapeandmakeitlessexpensiveandmoreeasilyaccessibletolowerincomeindividualswhosufferunjustlyfromhealthissuesbroughtonbyfoodinequality(MayorofLondon).Inrecentyearstherehasalsobeenanincreasedinterestinlocaleating,organicfoods,

  • 11

    sustainability,etc,broughtonbyglobaleffortstoreducecarbonfootprintsandaddressotherenvironmentalissues.RelatingwiththeLandTheidentityofthefarmisinherentlytiedupwithitslocationinaseverelydeprivedarea,itsreclamationofaBrownfieldsiteintheinnercity,itsstatusasalocalruncharityanditsrelianceongrantsandsocialenterpriseforsurvival.ThevalueofHackneyCityFarmtothecommunitymustthereforebeunderstoodthroughitssocial,environmental,andpoliticalrelationships,asidentitiesshiftwithachangingcontext,dependantuponthepointofreferenceandcanbeunderstooddifferentlydependingonthevantagepointoftheirformationandfunction.(FriedmaninHarvey,1996,p.7)Theserelationshipswillbeexploredinmoredetailbelow.Hackneyfarmsspecificlocationisaprimaryentrypointforunderstandingitsvalue.First,itrepresentsthereunionofsomeofthecitiespoorestandmostdeprivedcitizenswithproductivelandthattheywouldnototherwisehavehadaccessto.ThelocationofthefarminthemiddleofthecityandattheheartoftwoofLondonspoorestboroughsmakesiseasilyaccessibletoresidentsinanumberofways;itisineasywalkingdistanceformanyofitsvisitorsandclosetoanumberofpublictransportlinkstotherestofthepopulation.Furthermore,HackneyCityFarmisfreeandopenyearroundtothegeneralpublic:unliketheallotmentsystemthereisnoneedtoapplyandwaitforaplottoopenup,nortopayarentalfeetomaintainlicensetousethespace.Itthereforepresentstheopportunityforpeopleofallclassestointeractwithnaturewithoutmanyoftheconstraintsthathavehistoricallylimitedthisinteraction.Sincetheconstructionoftheurbanenvironmentisarelationalconstructwithmoralandsubjectivevaluesattached.Itmatterswhocreatesenvironmentsbecausethatdictateswhose

  • 12

    valuesarerepresented.ThelocalcommunitystartedHackneyCityFarmin1984indirectresponsetotheneedsoftheircommunity.AsCharlieputit:Itwasstartedasacohesionproject.Thepeoplegottogetherandsaid,lookattheurbanenvironmentwerelivingin,werebringingupawholegenerationofchildrenthathavenoideaaboutfood,aboutanimals,aboutanythingbecauseweveallbecomesodivorcedfromthat.Itsasocialprojectprimarily.(Payne,2010a)Today,HackneyCityFarmisstillmanagedanddrivenbylocalpeople.Itisacharityandvoluntaryorganization,aregisteredenvironmentalbody:itisasocialenterpriseandavibrantcommunityresource.Itsmainaim,asstatedintheFarmBusinessPlan,is:Toenhanceandimprovethequalityoflifeforinnercitypeople,especiallythoseinneighbourhoodsandcommunitiessurroundingHackneyCityFarm,byaddressingsocial,economicandenvironmentalissuesandprovidingappropriateandmuchneedededucational,training,healthandrecreationalopportunities,withinaframeworkofcityfarmingandlocalenvironmentalimprovement.ToengenderandfosteragreenecofriendlycommunitywithinahealthyandmuchimprovedareaofLondonwhilstalsobringingtogetherdisparatecommunitiesinareassurroundingtheFarmaroundtheissuesofimprovingthequalityoftheirlivesandtheirenvironment.(Pounds,2007,7)TheFarmwasstartedonbrownfieldlandandhasauniquerelationshipwiththelanditwasstartedon,asbothGustavoandCharliepointedout:TheFarmsbeenaroundforover25yearsorsoItwasreallyallslumhousinganditgotclearedandtheymadeapark(Payne,2009a)TheBoroughowns[theland],whywegetitonsuchgoodterm?Itwasderelictland,andinthe80stheseguyscameinandwerereallyconvertingapieceofdisusedspaceItwasabrewery,beforethatabuttonfactory[andthen]theareawastotallybombedoutinthewarInthe80stheymanagedtonegotiatea100yearcontractwiththecouncil(Payne,2009b)Thefarmslocationonoldindustriallandisareentryofproductivenatureintoapreviouslypollutedlandscape.Asenvironmentalinequalityoftenleadstosocialinequality,thereforeimprovingtheenvironmentalqualityofanareathenhasthe

  • 13

    potentialtolimitthesocialandenvironmentalinjusticesufferedbythelocalpopulation.AnotherimportantpartofHackneyCityFarmsrelationshiptotheareaisthelowcosthundredyearleasetheyobtainedfromthecouncilontheplot(presumablybecausethelandwasanundervaluedindustrialsite.)Thislongtermleasemeansthatthefarmissomewhatprotectedfromtherisinglandvaluationanddevelopmentpressuresinthearea.Thisallowsthefarmtoresist(atleasttemporarily)thecapitalistforcesthathavecontributedtotheremovalofurbanagriculturalspacesfromthecity.Howeveritdoesntchangethecircumstancesfacingthetargetbeneficiariesofthefarminthesurroundingneighbourhood.Theincreasingrisingpropertyvalueandrisingrentsintheareameanthatthosewhodonotownarestartingtobepushedout.Currentlythefeelingofthefarmsworkersisthattheyaresuccessfulinservinglowerincomefamiliesinthearea,butgentrificationisanoftaddressedtopic,asCharlieandGustavbothpointout,currently:ThefarmreflectsmuchmoreaccuratelythedemographicoftheareaThelowerincomefamilies,itspeoplelikethatweareaimingatsomethingthatthefarmwassetupandmanagedtostartwithWhenthefarmwasstarteduptherewasnttheyummymummydemographic,andweareaware,particularlywiththisideaofthisgardenprojectinthepark,[that]itcouldeasilybegetcooptedbythemiddleclasswhohavethetime,themoney,arealreadyinterestedingrowingtheirownvegetables(Payne,2009a)Anotherproblemtheyoftenfaceisthefactthat,evenwiththelowrent,theymuststillfindmoneytoruntheirdailyoperations.AlargepartofthismoneycomesintheformofGrantsfromsustainability,Farm,andeducationaltrusts,aswellastheNationalLotteryandanumberofcorporatesponsors.Havingawidebaseisveryimportantasitagainallowsthefarmtobemuchmorestable,however,asChrispointsout,relyingmostlyongrantscanbedifficult:Itsfindingthemoney[thatstheproblem].Myjobispaidforbythenationallottery.Itpaysfortheregularemployeestimeandthingslikeexpenses,butifwewantedtobuildagreenhouse.thecapitalcostscantcomeoutofthelotteryfunding,youcantbuythings,capitalthings,thingsyoucanownandsell,soIwonderifvegetablescount?IfIwanttobuysupplies,howdoIpayforthatitcanbequiteexpensive.Thatsafundingthingforthe

  • 14

    farmifwewanttogrowfoodtosellproduceenoughfoodtosellitsexpensivesowehavetofindotherfunding(Payne,2009a)Theseeconomicconstraintscreateatensionbetweenwhohasthefinalsayovertheactivitiesatthefarm,aspurchasesmustfallinlinewiththeguidelinesforgrantmoney.However,thishasstillhadabeneficialside,ithascausedthefarmtoreachouttootherinstitutionsinthecommunity,aswellasencouragesocialenterprise.Inthiswaytheeconomictensionshavealsobeenbeneficial,astheyhavecausedthefarmtodeepenitsconnectionswithinothercommunityorganizations.FoodforThoughtWhileHackneyCityFarmtechnicallyconstitutesproductiveland,thefarmdoesnotcurrentlyproduceenoughfoodtosellyet,andthereforedoesntservethepurposeofprovidingnutritionalbenefitstolocals.AlthoughtheyhaverestructuredtheoriginalgardenstobemoreproductiveandplantoopenacommunitygardeninLondonFieldsinabandonedareatogrowcheapproduce,theirlackofsufficientfoodproductioncallsintoquestionthebenefititsuppliestothelocalcommunity.However,DomeneandSauridiscussthefactthatassocionaturesgardenshavephysicalandsymbolicmeaningsandthattheirworthgoesbeyondtheirphysicalproductivecapacitytomoralanddiscursiverealmstheyaresymbolsofwhatwevalue,adesiretouseurbanbetter,thesenseofbeingusefultoothers,areconnectionwiththeland.InthiswayHackneyCityFarmsprovidesanumberoffurtherbenefittomembersoflowersocioeconomicgroups.Theyofferjuniorandadultgardeningcoursesandruneducationalprogramsonsustainability,eatinglocally,andgrowingvegetablesforlocalschools.TheseprogramsprovideinteractionwithnatureandagriculturetosomeofthepoorestchildreninHackney,manyofwhodonothaveaccesstoanysortofgardenintheirhomes,ortoagriculturallandoutsidethecity.ThefarmalsosupportsaGreenAmbassadorprogram,whichworkswithlocalcommunityleaders,teachingthemabouttheimportanceoftheenvironmentandsustainabilitysothattheycanengendertheseideasintothe

  • 15

    community.Inallthesewaysthefarmservestoreconnectpeoplewiththeconceptoffoodgrowth,sustainability,understandingofnatureandwherefoodcomesfrom.Whilenotsupplyingtheactualnutrition,itchangespeoplesconnectiontofoodandproductivespaceandgivesthemthechancetointeractinamoreindepthwaythanjustwalkingthroughorsittinginapark.PlantingnewseedsIftheUrbanenvironmentisarelationalconcept,withnecessarilysubjectiveandmoralvaluesattachedtoitscreation,thenitcanbeimpliedthatbyadjustingourvaluesandchangingourwayofunderstandingandrelatingtotheurbanenvironmentwecancreatemoreequitableplaces.EnriquePenelosa,mayorofBogota,hassaid,Citiesareaboutawayoflife...Peoplebehavethewaytheyaretreatedandifthecitytreatsthemwelltheyrespondinkind[Therefore]wehavetocreateasocietywhereotherthingsarevalued(E2,n.d.).Thephysicalwayweconstructthecityisimportantbecauseitisasymbolofourvalues.UrbanModernityisaparticularsetofprocessesofsociometabolictransformations[that]promisesexactlythepossibilityoftheactive,democraticandempoweringcreationofthosesociophysicalenvironmentswewishtoinhabit,andhumanagentsaredifferentfromotherformsoflifeintheirorganiccapacitytowishdifferently,toimaginedifferentpossiblefutures,toactdifferentlyinwaysdrivenandshapedbyhumandrives,desires,andimaginations.(Swyngedow,2006,p24)Whatwebuildisaphysicalmanifestationofourvalues,recreatedthroughouttimeandreinforcedbythatwhichwecreate.Thisiswhythehistoricalseparationofmanandnaturehasprovensodetrimental.Whenweseparatefromnatureweseparateourselvesliterallyfromthatwhichweneedtoproduceandreproduce.Wehavetheabilitytomoveforwardfromhere,tomakeurbanfarming,asfarmacology,anewpolemicagainsttheseparationofsocietyfromnature.Societiesandindividualshaveaninherentandinseparableroleincreatingtheurbanenvironmentsaroundthem.Allsocietiesareinthe

  • 16

    processofcreatingandrecreatingtheirnaturalenvironments,andbecauseofthisoururbanenvironmentsreflectbacka"naturalizationofthesocialassumptionsthatsculptedsuchlandscapesinthefirstplace.(Smith,2006,p.xiv)Wecreatenewvaluesthiswayandengenderthemovertime.Pounds(2007)hascalledHackneyCityfarmalearningopportunityasalivingexhibit.Itisasymbolandalivingsocionaturethatisconstantlyredevelopingandhastheabilitytorecreateitself,andtosetanexampleforthecreationofothersimilarplaces.Therefore,ifwerevolutionizeourwaysofthinkingabouttheurbanenvironmentandourcitieswecantransformtheplaceswecreate.

  • 17

    Appendix1GraphsofLandUseInHackney

    Region London Borough Land Use (Square metres (m2))

    London Hackney Tower Hamlets Total Area of All Land Types 394,440.50 4,709.32 6,097.81 Area of Domestic Gardens 94,061.74 872.36 448.22 Area of Green space 150,773.84 1,093.95 926.92 As a percentage of All Land Types London Hackney Tower Hamlets Area of Domestic Gardens 23.85% 18.52% 7.35% Area of Green space 38.22% 23.23% 15.20% Area per Person London Hackney Tower Hamlets Population 7,619,800 212,200 220,500.0 Area of Domestic Gardens 0.05 0.02 0.01 Area of Green space 0.08 0.02 0.02

  • 18

    Appendix2

  • 19

    ReferencesandBibliographyacology. (n.d.). Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary. Retrieved April 22, 2010, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/acology Allotment Vegetable Growing. History of Allotments in England Retrieved on March 1st, 2010 from: http://www.allotment.org.uk/articles/Allotment-History.php Barry, J. (1999) Environment and Social Theory. London: Routledge. Department of Neighborhoods and Communities (DCLG) (2010) Land Use Statistics (Generalised Land Use Database), Retrieved on April 20, 2010: http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadTableView.do?a=7&b=276754&c=hackney&d=13&e=8&g=334074&i=1001x1003x1004&m=0&r=1&s=1271773565134&enc=1&dsFamilyId=1201 Domene E. and Saur D. (2007). Urbanization and class-produced natures: Vegetable gardens in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region, Geoforum, 38, 287-298. E2 (n.d.) E2 design Series II Bogot: Building a Sustainable City Podcast, retrieved on March 30th from: http://www.e2-series.com/ with follow up from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuaXcRtgPzE Exploring 20th Century London. Retrieved on March 3 2010 from: http://www.20thcenturylondon.org.uk/server.php?show=conInformationRecord.286 Freudenberg, N., Libman, K., and Okeefe. A Tale of Two ObesCities: Comparing responses to childhood obesity in London and New York City. New York and London: City University of New York and London Metropolitain University Childhood Obesity Collaborative, January 2010. Gandy, M. (2006) Urban Nature and the Ecological imaginary in In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, eds. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., and Swyngedouw, E. London: Routledge. Chapter 4, pp. 63 74. Garnett, T. (2005) Urban Agriculture in London: Rethinking Our Food Economy in Growing Cities, Growing Food: Urban Agriculture on the Policy Agenda, retrieved on April 15th, 2010 from: http://www.ruaf.org/node/90 Government Office for London (GOL). (2007). Indices of Deprivation 2007. Retrieved April 22, 2010 from: http://www.london.gov.uk/search/google_appliance/deprivation%202007%20briefing Hackney Allotment Society.(2009). Retrieved on February 28th 2010 from: http://www.hackneyallotments.org.uk/ Hackney City Farm (HCF) organization website; Retrieved on April 20, 2010: http://www.hackneycityfarm.co.uk/ Hackney Council. (2007). Haggerston Ward Profile Report. Strategic Policy and Research, Customer and Corporate Services. Hackney Council. (2006). Hackney Borough Profile. Hackney Council. (2008a) Hackney Directory: Hackney Allotment Society. Retrieved on February 28th 2010 from: http://www.hackney.gov.uk/servapps/hackneydirectory/details.aspx?OrgID=2720 Hackney Council. (2008b). Hackney Sustainable Community Strategy. Hackney Council. (2009). Hackney Local Development Frameworkc Hackney Council. (2010, Feb. 1)a. Deprivation in Hackney. Retrieved on February 28th 2010 from: http://www.hackney.gov.uk/xp-factsandfigures-deprivation.htm Hackney Council. (2010, Feb. 1)b. Hackneys Population. Retrieved on February 28th 2010 from: http://www.hackney.gov.uk/xp-factsandfigures-mye.htm

  • 20

    Harvey, D. (1993) The nature of environment: dialectics of social and environmental change. The Socialist Register 30: p 1 51. Harvey, D (1996) Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell. Heynen, N. (2006) Justice of Eating in the City in In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, eds. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., and Swyngedouw, E. London: Routledge. Chapter 8, pp. 129 142. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., and Swyngedouw, E. (2006) Urban Political Ecology in In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, eds. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., and Swyngedouw, E. London: Routledge. Chapter 1, pp. 1 20. Mayor of London. (May 2006). Healthy and Sustainable Food For London: Mayors Food Strategy for London, Summary. London Development Agency: London. Nationwide. (2009) Housing Prices: Historical Q2. Retrieved on April 22, 2010 from: http://www.nationwide.co.uk/hpi/historical/Q2_2009.pdf Office for National Statistics. (2001) Hackney Profile 2001 Census. Retrieved on February 28th, 2010 from: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001/profiles/00AM.asp#work Office for National Statistics (2008) Population Estimate: Mid-2008 UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: 27/08/09, Table 8: Retrieved on April 20, 2010 from: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=15106 Payne, A. (2010a) Interview by Candidate # 11549 with Charlie Sayle, Volunteer & Education Manager, Hackney City Farm. Friday, February 12th, 2010, 10 am. Payne, A. (2010b) Interview by Candidate # 11549 with Gustavo Montes de Oca, Environmental and Enterprise Manager, Hackney City Farm. Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010, 10 am. Pounds, C. (2007) Hackney City Farm Business Plan 2006-2010. Unpublished. Hackney City Farm LTD. Smith, N. (2006) Foreward in In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, eds. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., and Swyngedouw, E. London: Routledge. Foreward, pp. xi xv. Smyth, C. (2009, September 9). Urban Green Space is Good for Your Health Claims Researcher. The Times Online. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/earth-environment/article6826772.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797084 Swyngedouw, E. (2006) Metabolic Urbanization in In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, eds. Heynen, N., Kaika, M., and Swyngedouw, E. London: Routledge. Chapter 1, pp. 21 39. Thomas, D. (1963) London's Green Belt: The Evolution of an Idea. The Geographical Journal, Vol. 129, No. 1 (Mar., 1963), pp. 14-24. Thompson, S. Corkey, L., and Judd, B. (2007). The role of Community Gardens in Sustaining Healthy Communities. Paper presented at the Third State of Australian Cities Conference, Adelaide, November 2007.accessed 24 August 2007.