upstream)satellite-derived)flow)signals)for) river)discharge...
TRANSCRIPT
Upstream Satellite-‐derived Flow Signals for River Discharge Predic;on
Tom Hopson1 F. A. Hirpa2; T. De Groeve3; G. R.
Brakenridge4; M. Gebremichael2; P. J. Restrepo5
1
2Uconn; 3Joint Res Counc; 4U. of CO; 5Office Hydro Devel
Outline I. Monitoring river flows using Satellite-‐based
Passive-‐Microwave data II. Case study: Bangladesh’s vulnerability to
flooding a) Es;ma;ng flood wave celerity b) River discharge es;ma;on “nowcas;ng” c) Discharge forecas;ng
III. Future Work
Data and data services to be discussed are available at the Flood Observatory http://floodobservatory.colorado.edu/
-‐-‐ Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer -‐ Earth Observing System (AMSR-‐E) & NASA TRMM (Future: Global Precipita;on Measurement System) -‐ -‐ U;lizing 36-‐37Ghz (unaffected by cloud) -‐ -‐ pixel size ~20km -‐ -‐ ~2day complete global coverage (night-‐;me brightness temperatures) -‐ -‐ data range: 1997 to present
Objec&ve Monitoring of River Stage and Flow: Satellite-‐based Passive Microwave Radiometer
Other Approaches: satellite al;meter-‐derived water level (and discharge derived through ra;ng curve): e.g. Birkee, 1998; Alsdorf et al. 2000; Jung et al. 2010, Papa et al. 2010, Alsdorf et al. 2011, Biancamaria et al. 2011
One day of data collec;on (high la;tudes revisited most frequently)
=> On average, global coverage 1-‐2 days
MODIS sequence of 2006 Winter Flooding 2/24/2006 C/M: 1.004 3/15/2006 C/M: 1.029 3/22/2006 C/M: 1.095
!"#$%&"'"#"(#)*+# ,)%*-#.*&&/#/"("0(1&2#)2/#3)44125##
6%&0""/1257#&.#(8"#9(8#:2("%2)(1&2)*#:;<=>?#<&2."%"20"#@#$&(8"2AB%5C#;D"/"2C#?)-#EFFG#H+#I)2/5%"2C#J+#KB*/"2#)2/#L+#M)2#/"#N)**"C#"/7+#
!"#$%&'$()*(#+,--.#/$(*)01.&2#+-'#*&)(3!-')*(#2)0&2#-*#$#')%&'4#5-6&%&'7#03)2#-*,"#'&)*+-'8&2#03&#+)'20#9'-!,&/#-+#03&#/$*1$,#6-':#$22-8)$0&.#6)03#&20$!,)23)*(#*&6#/-*)0-')*(#2)0&24#
;-#-%&'8-/)27#$#*&6#0&83*)<1$2#.&%&,-9&.#0-#12&#$,,#'&8-'.&.#!')(30*&22#0&/9&'$01'&#%$,1&2#)*#03-/9,&0-%&'$(&#-+# 03&#(,-!&7#$!$*.-*)*(# 03&# 2)0&=!$2&.# +,--.#/-*)0-')*(4#;3)2# 0&83*)<1&# '&21,02# )*#/-'&#$881'$0&# +,--.#&%&*0#.&0&80)-*#$*.7#!&8$12&#-+#)02#8-/9,&0$0)$,#8-%&'$(&7#)*#&$',"#,-6='&2-,10)-*#+,--.#/$99)*(4#
!"#$%&%'%()*
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
+,--,-.*/0,.12-344*23563072803*
K*20&$.#-+#-*,"#'&0$)*)*(#03&#-!2&'%$0)-*#%$,1&2#)*#$#+)E&.#'$.)12#$'-1*.#$#9'&.&+)*&.#(&-('$93)8#,-8$0)-*#@$#2)0&D7#-*$*#$,2-#!)*#$,,#-!2&'%$0)-*#%$,1&2#)*#$#9'&.&+)*&.#(').4#LS-2&#$#(').#-+#MBBB#!"#ABBB#9)E&,2#&<1$,,"#29$8&.#)*#$*#1*=9'-N&80&.#(&-('$93)8#29$8&#+'-/#OPBL#0-#OPBQ#$*.#RBS#0-#RBT4#U0#03&#&<1$0-'7#&$83#9)E&,#8-''&29-*.2#0-#$*#$'&$#-+#$'-1*.#OBB:/A7#&<1)%$,&*0#0-#03&#+)&,.#-+#%)&6#-+#03&#UHTV=Q#)*20'1/&*04#S&$'#03	-,&27#%$,1&2#-+#&$83#UHTV=Q#9)E&,#$'&#$00')!10&.#0-#/-'$*#-*&#!)*7#$88-'.)*(#0-#03	'-N&80)-*#9$'$/&0&'2#@,-*()01.)*$,#20'&083D4#
#
!"#$%&'()'*"+&,-./&0'12&3+4'.50'#%"0,-./&0'1%"#6+4'-%"#6+5&//'+&78&%.+$%&'0&+&%7"5.+"95'39%'.'+.%#&+'29:.+"95'1+6":;'%&0'2"5&4)'<%"#6+5&//'+&78&%.+$%&/'93'/=.+6'8">&2/'109++&0'2"5&4'.%&'.++%"-$+&0'+9'+6&'5&.%&/+'19?&%2.88"5#4'+.%#&+'1/"+&'9%'8">&2'
%&/8&:+"?&2@4)'
;3&# 8--'.)*$0&2# -+# (').# 9)E&,2# '&9'&2&*0# 03&# 8&*0'&# 9-)*0# -+# 03&# (').# 9)E&,4# ;3&# 8--'.)*$0&2# -+# 26$03# 9)E&,2# $,2-#'&9'&2&*0#03&*0'	-)*0#-+#2&*2-'#-!2&'%$0)-*24#T6$03#9)E&,2#$'&#$22)(*&.#0-#03,-2&20#(').#9)E&,7# )4&4#$#*&$'&20#*&)(3!-'#2$/9,)*(#$99'-$834#K+#/-'$*#-*&#-!2&'%$0)-*#+$,,2#)*#03$/&#(').#9)E&,7#03&)'#!')(30*&22#0&/9&'$01'&#%$,1&2#$'&#$%&'$(&.4#;3)2#)2#03$2&#)*#3)(3#,$0)01.&27#63&'&#.)++&'&*0#26$032#-+#$#2)*(,&#.$"#-%&',$94#
#
Example: Wabash River, Indiana, USA
Black square shows measurement pixel. White square is calibra;on pixel.
1000120014001600180020002200240026002800
19-J
un-0
219
-Jul
-02
18-A
ug-0
217
-Sep
-02
17-O
ct-0
216
-Nov
-02
16-D
ec-0
215
-Jan
-03
14-F
eb-0
316
-Mar
-03
15-A
pr-0
315
-May
-03
14-J
un-0
314
-Jul
-03
13-A
ug-0
312
-Sep
-03
12-O
ct-0
311
-Nov
-03
11-D
ec-0
310
-Jan
-04
9-Fe
b-04
10-M
ar-0
49-
Apr
-04
9-M
ay-0
48-
Jun-
048-
Jul-0
47-
Aug
-04
6-S
ep-0
46-
Oct
-04
5-N
ov-0
45-
Dec
-04
4-Ja
n-05
3-Fe
b-05
5-M
ar-0
54-
Apr
-05
4-M
ay-0
53-
Jun-
053-
Jul-0
52-
Aug
-05
1-S
ep-0
51-
Oct
-05
31-O
ct-0
530
-Nov
-05
30-D
ec-0
529
-Jan
-06
28-F
eb-0
630
-Mar
-06
29-A
pr-0
629
-May
-06
28-J
un-0
628
-Jul
-06
27-A
ug-0
6
AM
SR
-E ra
dian
ce,
degr
ees
K x
10
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Est
imat
ed D
isch
arge
(m3/
sec)
Brakenridge, et al, 1998, 2005, 2007
GDACS, JRC Gridded Approach
De Groeve, et al, 2009, 2010
=> Use “M/C” ra;o
s =MC=Tb,measurementTb,calibration
Hardinge Bridge gauge (Ganges)
Gauging data reference: Hopson 2005; Hopson and Webster 2010
Bahadurabad gauge (Brahmaputra)
Ganges
Brahmaputra
CorrelaUon vs. lag Ume and distance between Gage Q & satellite signals
Ganges Brahmaputra
Es;ma;ng the kinema;c wave celerity
Assump;ons (large): hydraulic parameters homogenous; rainfall predominantly upper-‐catchment; wave speed varia;on with depth lower-‐order; dynamic wave effects lower-‐order (confirmed through ra;ng curve analysis – not shown), etc. Independent analysis: Kleitz-‐Seddon Law for kinema;c wave celerity c: W channel top-‐width, Q discharge, y the river stage. Brahmaputra at Bahadurabad: 4m/s < c < 8m/s; Ganges at Hardinge Bridge: 2m/s < c < 6m/s.
c = 1W
dQdy
Genera;on of Nowcasts and Forecasts
Regressor and model selec;on procedure: i) Correlate all variables with gauged observa;ons
ii) Sort in decreasing level
iii) Select using step-‐wise forward-‐selec;on using K-‐fold cross-‐valida;on and RMSE cost func;on
iv) Repeat ii) – iii) for all lead-‐;mes
Discharge es;ma;on “Nowcas;ng”
Ganges 2003 Brahmaputra 2007
1-‐, 5-‐, 15-‐day Forecasts
Skill Scores
Nash-‐Sutcliffe efficiency (frac;on of variance explained): -‐-‐ 80% (1-‐day) to 55% (15-‐day)
explained
Now, generate a forecast including “persistence”: -‐-‐ satellite informa;on improves forecasts by 10-‐20% at all lead-‐;mes
SS =Aforc − ArefAperf − Aref
Future Work Blend with ECMWF-‐derived forecasts
(Hopson and Webster 2010; Opera&onal in 2003)
2007 Brahmaputra Ensemble Forecasts and Danger Level Probabili;es
7-10 day Ensemble Forecasts 7-10 day Danger Levels
7 day 8 day
9 day 10 day
7 day 8 day
9 day 10 day
Summary
§ Satellite-‐based passive microwave imagery useful tool for monitoring river condi;ons for limited-‐gauged basins § Useful for es;ma;ng:
-‐-‐ flood wave celerity -‐-‐ discharge es;mates (nowcasts) including filling in missing data
§ Combined with other methodologies, a poten;ally useful tool for flood forecas;ng of large river basins
Further ques;ons: [email protected]