university of washingtoncomputing & communications campus network design: wired vs. wireless...

34
University of Washington Computing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing & Communications September 2001

Post on 19-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN:Wired vs. Wireless

Terry GrayDirector,

Networks & Distributed ComputingUW Computing & Communications

September 2001

Page 2: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Scope of UW Networking• UW Campus Networks

– Seattle– Tacoma– Bothell/CCC

• Medical Centers (net design)– UW Physicians Network– UW Medical Center– Harborview Medical Center

• Pacific/NorthWest Gigapop– Pacific Wave exchange point– Pacific Light Rail

• Statewide K20 Network

Page 3: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Pacific Northwest Gigapop

Page 4: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Baseline Connectivity

• Shared 10Mbps HD

• Switched 10Mbps HD

• Switched 10/100Mbps FD– backed by GE switch/router infrastructure

• Goal: Switched 10/100 FD for all; GE for a few

• Reality: Cat3 wireplant upgrade will take multiple years and multiple millions of dollars

Page 5: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Advanced Services• Multicast

– Partially deployed– Older routers need to be replaced

• QoS– Laissez faire? Premium service?– Best with FD connections.

• VoIP– Needs QoS, extra-high availability– POE desirable; implies UPS in closets

• IPv6

Page 6: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Premium Services?

• Wide-area QoS chargeback?

• Preferred access to Internet for a fee?

• Lots of interesting policy and tech issues...

Page 7: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Mistakes We Didn't Make

• FDDI to the desk• VLANs• ATM• Various "cut-thru IP switching" digressions

• Claim: Staying with pure IP and Ethernet has served UW very well...

Page 8: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Current Statistics• Avg Backbone traffic: nearly 2 TB/day• Peak Inbound traffic: 100 Mbps (40 in 1999)• Peak Outbound traffic: 160 Mbps (20 in 1999)• Doubling time: Less than 2 years!!• Hosts: over 50,000• Modems: over 2,000• Switched subnets: 70% (30% in 1999)• 10/100 FD subnets: 25% (5% in 1999)• Cat 5 buildings: 10%

Page 9: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

UW-S Building/Subnet Status

Depts Dorms Hospitals TOTAL

Buildings 193 Cat 3 175 Cat 5 18

Subnets 269- 41 - 310

10Mbps 85 100Mbps 1311000Mbps 94

Page 10: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

GigE Buildings

• Physics/Astronomy• Fisheries Center• new Ocean• Lander Hall• McCarty Hall• Parrington Hall• Edmondson Pavillion• Mary Gates Hall• OUG Library

• part of Electrical Engr.• part of HS K wing• part of HS T wing • part of Johnson Hall• part of Savery• part of Thomson Hall• part of 4545

Page 11: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Simplified Network Topology

Router Router

BorderRouter

CoreSwitch

EdgeSwitch

Edge Switch

InteriorSwitch

InteriorSwitch

Gigapop Internet2

DesktopDesktop

Internet

Fed Nets4

30

300

1000+Branch Site

50,000

PBX

Page 12: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Page 13: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Number of Devices

Page 14: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Backbone Traffic

Page 15: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Border Traffic 1999

Page 16: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Border Traffic 2001

Page 17: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Recurring Theme: Explosive Growth

• More users• More devices• Longer use• New (bandwidth-intensive) applications

– e.g. remote collaboration tools– audio/video streaming– tele-immersion– distance learning

Page 18: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Networking Hot List• Campus building/subnet upgrades• Backbone upgrades (production, experimental)• Regional networking• Network Hardening• Security• Advanced Services• Wireless• Management/diagnostic tools

Page 19: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Success Metrics

• 10/100 FD connections: xx%

• Multicast deployment: xx%

• QoS deployment: xx%

• Dept’l wireless coverage: xx%

• Router center hardening: xx%

• Backbone capacity

• IPv6 capable routers

Page 20: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

On to Wireless...

Page 21: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Wireless Categories

• Wireless by Purpose– Point-to-Point links– Access networks

• Wireless by Spectrum– Infrared– RF– Optical

Page 22: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Wireless RF by Range• PAN/HAN (Personal/Home-Area-Network)

– Bluetooth– HomeRF

• LAN (Local-Area-Network)– IEEE 802.11– ETSI HiperLAN2

• MAN (Metro-Area-Network)– LMDS, “Fixed Wireless”

• WAN (Wide-Area-Network)– Ricochet (R.I.P.)– CDPD– 2.5G, 3G, etc, etc, etc

Page 23: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

LAN Wireless Standards

• IEEE 802.11 2.4GHz, 1-2Mbps, FHSS, DSSS

• IEEE 802.11b 2.4Ghz, 11Mbps DSSS (WiFi)

• IEEE 802.11a 5Ghz, 54Mbps

• ETSI HiperLAN2 5Ghz, 54Mbps, TDMA

• In US, all use unlicensed “ISM” bands

Page 24: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

802.11 ISSUES

• Network Design, esp. Topology

• Access control

• Security

• Compatibility

• Interference

• Relation to Bluetooth, HomeRF, etc

• Obsolescence

Page 25: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

ROAMING ISSUES

• Layer 2 (802.11) vs. Layer 3 (Mobile IP)

• Vendor incompatibility

• LAN vs. WAN

• We will support L2 roaming within a building by dedicating one subnet for all access points in the building.

Page 26: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Policy Issues

• Part of campus network infrastructure

• Want to encourage small-scale deployments with minimum overhead, but coordination needed to avoid interference

• Large-scale deployments need to be coordinated by C&C

• Campus-wide access control policy

Page 27: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

UW-S Wireless Deployment

• C&C Pilot Project– Kane Hall, Rm. 130– Mary Gates Hall– Gerberding Hall– Odegaard Undergraduate Library

• Other wireless projects– CS, C&C, Business, MCIS, ...

Page 28: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Pilot Project Objectives

• Provide 11 Mb coverage throughout selected facilities.

• Allow roaming within facility space.

• Develop suitable policies.

• Gain operational experience.

Page 29: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Pilot Project Lessons Learned

• Success depends on cooperation w/dep’ts

• It takes more wire than you think!

• Site surveys & frequency sweeps needed.

• WEP is not secure; use SSH, SSL, etc.

• Technology still evolving

• 2.4GHz phones interfere badly

Page 30: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Wired vs. Wireless Issues

• Server suitability• Performance• Performance variation• Price/Performance• Interference• Technology maturity• Advanced services• Security

Page 31: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

802.11a: Successor?

• Faster• Shorter distance• More power consumption• Probably won’t replace 802.11b• Probably need WAPs for both

Page 32: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Infrastructure Requirements

Phones Wired Wireless

Closets YES YES YES

Conduit YES YES YES

Wireplant YES YES Much

Switches Maybe YES Some

WAPs NO NO YES

Page 33: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Conclusions

• Wireless is very addictive.

• It will be very popular.

• It will be very problematic.

• The dust has not settled.

• In offices, it is not a replacement for wired.

• In classrooms, lounges, etc, it is… but that still requires some wired infrastructure.

Page 34: University of WashingtonComputing & Communications CAMPUS NETWORK DESIGN: Wired vs. Wireless Terry Gray Director, Networks & Distributed Computing UW Computing

University of Washington Computing & Communications

Wireless References• Open Group: www.openwirelessdata.org• Wireless Ethernet Compatibility Alliance (WECA)• Wireless LAN Association (WLANA)• Portable Computer & Communications Association (PCCA)• Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)• WAP Forum• Bluetooth Special Interest Group• Mobile Wireless Internet Forum (MWIF)• Wireless Information Networks Forum (WINForum)• HiperLAN2 Global Forum• Wireless Data Forum