university of toronto t-space€¦ · web viewtable s2. results from a tukey-kramer post-hoc tests...

21
Supplementary Material Supplementary Tables Table S1. Source information for estimated percent germination and dormancy breaking information, used to determine the number of seeds per petri dish and additional treatment in our experiment. Species Code Estimated Germ Percentage Germ Percentage/Dormancy Breaking info: Amsinckia menziesii 40% http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/ rmrs_2010_forbis_t001.pdf Atriplex lentiformis 10% http://npn.rngr.net/ renderNPNProtocolDetails? selectedProtocolIds=chenopodiaceae- atriplex-1394 Brassica nigra 60-80% based on our previous germination trials Bromus diandrus 60-80% based on our previous germination trials Bromus 60-80% based on our previous germination trials

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Tables

Table S1. Source information for estimated percent germination and dormancy breaking

information, used to determine the number of seeds per petri dish and additional treatment in our

experiment.

Species CodeEstimated Germ

PercentageGerm Percentage/Dormancy Breaking info:

Amsinckia

menziesii 40%

http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs_other/

rmrs_2010_forbis_t001.pdf

Atriplex lentiformis10%

http://npn.rngr.net/renderNPNProtocolDetails?

selectedProtocolIds=chenopodiaceae-atriplex-1394

Brassica nigra 60-80% based on our previous germination trials

Bromus diandrus 60-80% based on our previous germination trials

Bromus

madritensis 60-80% based on our previous germination trials

Elymus

condensatus 50% based on IRC seed farm observation

Encelia californica 30% based on our previous germination trials

Eriogonum

fasciculatum

50%

http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/beyers/

psw_2010_beyers013(montalvo)eriogonumfasciculatum

.pdf

Erodium

cicutarium 50% based on our previous germination trials

Page 2: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Eschscholzia

californica 40%

http://npn.rngr.net/renderNPNProtocolDetails?

selectedProtocolIds=papaveraceae-eschscholzia-605

Lupinus bicolor40%

http://npn.rngr.net/renderNPNProtocolDetails?

selectedProtocolIds=fabaceae-lupinus-636

Lupinus

succulentus 40% based on our previous germination trials

Malosma laurina 50%

https://books.google.com/books?

id=ZnBRmdUU_3UC&pg=PA957&lpg=PA957&dq=c

old+stratifying+seeds+malosma&source=bl&ots=Tg1d

FmEow_&sig=hIakRlMRDmvDsHrvcQ_E__8dZSI&hl

=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjI_7mLrpjKAhUOxmMKH

azLC6YQ6AEIMTAD#v=onepage&q=cold

%20stratifying%20seeds%20malosma&f=false

Penstemon

spectabilis 20%

http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?

article=1664&context=agronomyfacpub

Peritoma arborea 20% based on anecdotal planting success from IRC employee

Phacelia cicutaria 20% based on our previous germination trials

Plantago erecta 50% based on our previous germination trials

Rhus integrifolia50%

http://www.cnpssd.org/germination%20rhus

%20integ.pdf

Stipa pulchra 30% based on our previous germination trials

Page 3: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction
Page 4: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Table S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B)

treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction on germination timing. Shared letters

indicate no significant differences amongst groups (P<0.05 significance level). Mean and SE

values are also provided.

A.

Species

Mean Days to

Germination Standard Error Letter Group

Rhus integrifolia 25.70 0.9138 A

Peritoma arborea 21.45 0.5977 B

Malosma laurina 19.80 0.6089 B

Eriogonum

fasciculatum15.84

0.5752 C

Elymus condensatus 15.51 0.3663 C

Encelia californica 15.06 0.4719 C

Atriplex lentiformis 14.27 0.2475 C

Eschscholzia

californica13.76

0.4415 C

Stipa pulchra 11.59 0.2951 D

Bromus diandrus 8.96 0.3112 E

Amsinckia menziesii 8.77 0.3258 E

Bromus madritensis 7.73 0.325 EF

Lupinus bicolor 7.14 0.3715 FG

Brassica nigra 6.64 0.2931 FG

Page 5: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Erodium cicutarium 6.43 0.2577 FG

Lupinus succulentus 5.77 0.2823 G

Rhus integrifolia 25.70 0.9138 A

B.

Treatment

Mean Days to

Germination Standard Error Letter Group

soil 13.8748 13.87 A

ppfm 12.2493 12.25 B

control 12.2053 12.21 B

C.

Species Treatment

Mean Days

to

Germination Standard Error Letter Group

Rhus

integrifolia soil26.02 1.622 A

Rhus

integrifolia ppfm25.85 1.871 A

Rhus

integrifolia control25.23 1.149 A

Peritoma

arborea soil24.38 1.115 A

Malosma

laurina ppfm20.40 1.004 ABC

Page 6: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Malosma

laurina control20.11 0.871 AB

Peritoma

arborea ppfm20.05 0.856 ABD

Peritoma

arborea control19.92 1.085 ABC

Malosma

laurina soil18.88 1.228 ABCE

Eschscholzia

californica soil16.89 0.921 BCEF

Eriogonum

fasciculatum soil16.69 0.921 BCEFG

Encelia

californica soil16.69 1.005 BCEFG

Atriplex

lentiformis soil16.26 0.410 CE

Elymus

condensatus soil16.01 0.581 BCEF

Eriogonum

fasciculatum control15.99 1.029 BCEFGH

Elymus

condensatus control15.92 0.655 BCEF

Eriogonum

fasciculatum ppfm14.85 1.004 CDEFGHI

Elymus

condensatus ppfm14.59 0.615 EFGH

Page 7: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Encelia

californica control14.50 0.714 EFGH

Encelia

californica ppfm14.00 0.649 EFGHI

Atriplex

lentiformis ppfm13.77 0.397 FGH

Eschscholzia

californica ppfm12.87 0.649 FGHIJ

Atriplex

lentiformis control12.79 0.404 GHI

Stipa

pulchra soil11.93 0.516 HIJK

Stipa

pulchra ppfm11.72 0.483 HIJK

Eschscholzia

californica control11.52 0.650 HIJKLM

Stipa

pulchra control11.12 0.471 IJKL

Amsinckia

menziesii soil9.75 0.662 JKLMN

Brassica

nigra soil9.39 0.525 KLMN

Bromus

diandrus soil9.35 0.568 KLMNO

Bromus

diandrus control9.21 0.496 KLMN

Page 8: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Amsinckia

menziesii control8.56 0.483 LMNOP

Bromus

diandrus ppfm8.31 0.490 NOPQ

Bromus

madritensis soil8.21 0.545 MNOPQR

Amsinckia

menziesii ppfm8.00 0.471 NOPQR

Lupinus

bicolor soil7.99 0.668 LMNOPQRST

Erodium

cicutarium soil7.61 0.422 NOPQRS

Bromus

madritensis ppfm7.60 0.538 NOPQRST

Bromus

madritensis control7.38 0.549 NOPQRST

Lupinus

bicolor ppfm7.21 0.637 NOPQRST

Lupinus

bicolor control6.20 0.573 OPQRST

Lupinus

succulentus soil5.92 0.493 PQRST

Lupinus

succulentus control5.89 0.467 QRST

Erodium

cicutarium ppfm5.84 0.419 QRST

Page 9: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Erodium

cicutarium control5.83 0.427 QRST

Lupinus

succulentus ppfm5.51 0.441 RST

Brassica

nigra ppfm5.41 0.464 ST

Brassica

nigra control5.12 0.469 T

Rhus

integrifolia soil26.02 1.622 A

Rhus

integrifolia ppfm25.85 1.871 A

Rhus

integrifolia control25.23 1.149 A

Page 10: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Table S3. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test analyzing the effect of (A) species, (B)

treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction percent germination. Shared letters indicate

no significant differences amongst groups (P<0.05 significance level). Mean and SE values are

also provided.

A.

Species

Mean %

Germinatio

n SE Group

Brassica

nigra1.313 0.032

A

Erodium

cicutarium1.270 0.032

AB

Bromus

diandrus1.137 0.032

BC

Bromus

madritensis0.998 0.032

CD

Atriplex

lentiformis0.947 0.032

D

Stipa

pulchra0.917 0.032

D

Lupinus

succulentus0.871 0.032

D

Amsinckia

menziesii0.659 0.032

E

Lupinus 0.597 0.032 E

Page 11: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

bicolor

Elymus

condensatus0.543 0.032

EF

Eschscholzi

a californica0.441 0.032

FG

Encelia

californica0.415 0.032

FG

Peritoma

arborea0.333 0.032

GH

Eriogonum

fasciculatum0.311 0.032

GH

Malosma

laurina0.303 0.032

GH

Rhus

integrifolia0.228 0.032

H

B.

Treatment

Mean %

Germinatio

n SE

Letter

Group

ppfm 0.750 0.014 A

control 0.733 0.014 A

soil 0.632 0.014 B

C.

Species Treatment Mean % SE Letter Group

Page 12: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Germination

Brassica nigra ppfm 1.459 0.055 A

Brassica nigra control 1.426 0.055 A

Erodium cicutarium ppfm 1.314 0.055 AB

Bromus diandrus ppfm 1.259 0.055 ABC

Erodium cicutarium soil 1.257 0.055 ABCD

Erodium cicutarium control 1.240 0.055 ABCDE

Bromus diandrus control 1.221 0.055 ABCDEF

Brassica nigra soil 1.053 0.055 BCDEFG

Bromus madritensis ppfm 1.017 0.055 BCDEFGH

Bromus madritensis soil 0.993 0.055 CDEFGH

Bromus madritensis control 0.984 0.055 CDEFGH

Stipa pulchra control 0.972 0.055 CDEFGH

Atriplex lentiformis ppfm 0.969 0.055 CDEFGH

Lupinus succulentus ppfm 0.949 0.055 DEFGHI

Atriplex lentiformis control 0.945 0.055 EFGHI

Stipa pulchra ppfm 0.932 0.055 EFGHI

Bromus diandrus soil 0.930 0.055 EFGHI

Atriplex lentiformis soil 0.926 0.055 FGHI

Lupinus succulentus control 0.863 0.055 GHIJ

Stipa pulchra soil 0.845 0.055 GHIJK

Lupinus succulentus soil 0.799 0.055 GHIJKL

Page 13: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Amsinckia menziesii ppfm 0.757 0.055 GHIJKLM

Amsinckia menziesii control 0.731 0.055 HIJKLM

Lupinus bicolor control 0.657 0.055 IJKLMN

Lupinus bicolor ppfm 0.585 0.055 JKLMNO

Elymus condensatus soil 0.581 0.055 JKLMNO

Lupinus bicolor soil 0.548 0.055 KLMNO

Elymus condensatus ppfm 0.544 0.055 KLMNOP

Encelia californica ppfm 0.509 0.055 LMNOP

Eschscholzia

californica ppfm0.508 0.055

LMNOP

Elymus condensatus control 0.503 0.055 LMNOP

Amsinckia menziesii soil 0.489 0.055 MNOPQ

Eschscholzia

californica control0.467 0.055

MNOPQ

Encelia californica control 0.452 0.055 MNOPQ

Peritoma arborea ppfm 0.412 0.055 NOPQ

Malosma laurina control 0.365 0.055 NOPQ

Eschscholzia

californica soil0.348 0.055

NOPQ

Eriogonum

fasciculatum soil0.346 0.055

OPQ

Rhus integrifolia control 0.314 0.055 OPQ

Malosma laurina ppfm 0.307 0.055 OPQ

Eriogonum ppfm 0.294 0.055 OPQ

Page 14: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

fasciculatum

Peritoma arborea soil 0.294 0.055 OPQ

Eriogonum

fasciculatum control0.294 0.055

OPQ

Peritoma arborea control 0.291 0.055 OPQ

Encelia californica soil 0.283 0.055 OPQ

Malosma laurina soil 0.237 0.055 PQ

Rhus integrifolia ppfm 0.189 0.055 Q

Rhus integrifolia soil 0.181 0.055 Q

Page 15: University of Toronto T-Space€¦ · Web viewTable S2. Results from a Tukey-Kramer post-hoc tests on the effect of (A) species, (B) treatment, and (C) species-by-treatment interaction

Table S4. Pearson correlation coefficients and P-values associated with mean germination

timing (MGT), mean percent germination (MPG), and seed weight (g).

Pearson Correlation Coefficients,

N=18 P-values

Control MPG MGT Weight_g Control MPG MGT Weight_g

MPG 1 -0.69735 -0.28855 MPG . 0.0013 0.2456

MGT 1 0.36179 MGT . 0.1401

Weight_g 1

Weight_

g .

PPFM MPG MGT Weight_g Control MPG MGT Weight_g

MPG 1 -0.6988 -0.26186 MPG . 0.0013 0.2939

MGT 1 0.52166 MGT . 0.0264

Weight_g 1

Weight_

g .

Soil MPG MGT Weight_g Control MPG MGT Weight_g

MPG 1 -0.38978 -0.2693 MPG . 0.1098 0.2799

MGT 1 0.54665 MGT . 0.0189

Weight_g 1

Weight_

g .