university of north dakota frozen fury critical design review february 2, 2015

69
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Upload: wayne-stanbrough

Post on 15-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

University of North Dakota

Frozen Fury

Critical Design ReviewFebruary 2, 2015

Jeff G.
I think we can delete this part
Page 2: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Length: 105 inchesDiameter: 6.155 inchesMass: 26.2 lbs

General Vehicle Dimensions

Center of Gravity: 57.579 inchesCenter of Pressure: 68.434Safety Margin: 1.76

Page 3: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Critical Flight and Payload Systems

Different subsystems of the rocket

Page 4: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Airframe – carbon fiber◦ Superior strength to weight ratio◦ Ease of workability

Fins – birch plywood in carbon fiber◦ Combines the strength of both materials for a more rigid,

strong, and lightweight fin

Bulk-Head/Centering ring – 0.5 inch birch plywood◦ Cabinet quality grain, few knots, and locally available

Materials and Justifications

Page 5: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Location of Launch Lugs (inches)

Location of Centering Rings (inches)Fin Dimensions (mm)

General Vehicle Dimensions

Page 6: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Fins ◦ Symmetric shape and quantity allows for ease of

construction, trapezoidal shape limits potential damage to fins upon landing

Diameter ◦ 6” diameter allows for ease of assembly and plenty of

workspace. ◦ Also allows for better utilization of scrap components, and

expansion of internal components if necessary

Materials and Justifications

Page 7: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Nose Cone Dimensions (mm)

General Vehicle Dimensions

Page 8: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Nosecone ◦ Will be purchased to insure proper functionality

West Systems Epoxy◦ Used to bind the above materials together as well as some

hardware (bolts, nuts, threaded rods)

Materials and Justifications

Page 9: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Parachute Attachment Bulkhead

Bulkhead Dimensions (inch)

Page 10: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Parachutes

Parachute type Parachute size Harness Type Harness Length Descent Rate

Drogue 36 in ripstop nylon 5ft 62 ft/s

Main 115 in ripstop nylon 5ft 16.08 ft/s

Payload 58 in ripstop nylon 5ft 22.47 ft/s

Page 11: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Deployment of Parachutes

Page 12: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Flight Analysis

Total motion vs. Time

Page 13: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Drift Analysis at 5 mph

Page 14: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Drift Analysis at 10 mph

Page 15: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Drift Analysis at 15 mph

Page 16: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Drift Analysis 20 mph

Page 17: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Drag Analysis

Drag Coefficient at 5 mph

Page 18: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

AGSE Design

Rocket in Horizontal Position

Payload System

Linear Actuator

Ignition Insertion System

ElectricalBox

Jeff G.
Needs updated picture
Page 19: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Lifted Rocket Position

Rocket in 5° to vertical Position

Jeff G.
add justification for elimination of excess frame
Page 20: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Square Tube Iron

Frame

Page 21: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Electrical Box

Basic electrical schematic Arduino board

All components for the AGSE will be housed in the black box that is on the frame.

Page 22: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Claw With Pan/Tilt Bracket

● Servo to open and close claw

● Another servo to tilt claw

Claw assembly (in)Claw assembled by the team

Page 23: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Belt/Slider Rail

Slider with belt assembly (in)

Page 24: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Payload Acquisition System

Payload acquisition assembly (in)

Page 25: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Belt/Slider Rail

Slider assembled by the team

Page 26: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Actuator Position

● Linear actuator has stall torque of 240 lbs.

Rocket actuator assembly (in)

Page 27: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Ignition Insertion System

Side view of the ignition system

Page 28: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Wire Funnel

● Mounted to the rail● Will help guide the

ignition wire into the rocket motor

Ignition system funnel (in)

Page 29: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Wire Extension Assembly

● 1, 16 tooth gear is driven by 51 RPM motor

● 2, 32 tooth gears spin rubber wheels

● Steel housing ● Will be mounted on rail

Ignition system gearbox (in)

Page 30: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Wire Spool Housing

● Steel housing for spool

● Ignition wire is coiled around spool

● Mounted to rail

Ignition system wire spool (in)

Page 31: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

● If the stability of the rocket on the rail becomes an issue, there will be guides added to the rail.

● A counter weight will be added to the end of the rail behind the wire spool to alleviate motor stress of the actuator.

Final Design Changes to be Made

Page 32: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Design Justifications

Page 33: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Justifications 54.0 mm diameter allows

for easy downscaling Black Max Propellant

provides the high visibility tracking of dense black exhaust

Manufacturer: AeroTech

Mfr. Designation: K480W

Motor Type: reload

Diameter: 54.0 mm

Length: 57.9 cm

Total Weight: 2078 g

Average Thrust: 528.67 N

Maximum Thrust: 1017.8 N

Total impulse: 2273.3 Ns

Burn Time: 4.3s

Baseline Motor Selection and Justification

Page 34: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Motor Selection: Aerotech K480W

Aerotech K480W Thrust per second

Page 35: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Thrust-to-Weight Ratio

Thrust to weight ratio 7.75:1

Page 36: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Dual deployment system Two Perfect Flight altimeters

used as a backup system◦ Measures barometric

pressure◦ “Mach” delay for safety◦ Deploys drogue parachute at

apogee◦ Deploys main parachute at

3000 ft AGL and payload parachute at 1000ft AGL

Avionics

Page 37: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Avionics: Altimeter Bay

Page 38: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Altimeter Bay Schematics

Page 39: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Payload Securing

Payload Compartment 3-D View Payload Compartment Rear View

Page 40: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Sequence Code

Page 41: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Sequence Code

Page 42: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Code

Declaration of Switches and Pins

Page 43: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Sequence Code

Initialization of Switches and Pins

Page 44: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Code

Declaration of Switches and Pins

Starting Positions

Page 45: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Code

Claw Actions

Page 46: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Code

More Claw Actions

Page 47: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Code

AGSE Actions

Page 48: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Code

AGSE Actions

Page 49: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Payload acquisition ◦ Payload is in the launch vehicle and secured

Rocket Erection ◦ Rocket is lifted to a position of 85 degrees from the

horizontal

Wire Insertion◦ Wire is fully inserted in motor and no accidental charge

ignites motor

Success Criteria for AGSE

Page 50: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Rocket launch◦ Reaching an altitude of 3000 feet at apogee.

Rocket recovery◦ The recovery system deploying properly at the appropriate

altitude and recovering the rocket on the ground such that it is deemed reusable for future launches

Payload◦ The payload should be ejected from the rocket at 1,000 feet

and return to the ground with its own parachute.

Success Criteria for Launch Vehicle

Page 51: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Rocket Flight Stabilityin Static Margin Diagram

The center of gravity is forward of the center of pressure (closer to the nosecone)

Rocket Flight Static Margin10.855

Center of Pressure68.434 in

Center of Gravity57.579 in

Kinetic Energy ft-lbs

Drogue 1562.95

Main Parachute 68.17

Payload Parachute 70.29

Page 52: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

The minimum rod speed that ensures a stable flight is generally between 30 fps (20 mph) to 45 fps (30 mph).

Exit rail velocity: 69.5 ft/s

A pair of rail beads will be used to ensure the rocket reaches adequate speed off of the rail while maintaining proper orientation

Vehicle Safety

Page 53: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Critique Score 1/51 = Bad

5 = Good

Comments

Is this design safe? 4 This design will allow for ease of construction and eliminate safety concerns associated with more complex construction methods

Is this design limiting? 4 Altitude is expected to be reached and the design will accommodate larger motors and payload components

Does this design meet the requirements of the payload/rocket?

4 This current rocket design satisfies the requirements for the projected payload.

Will this design land safely? Parachute sizes, impact absorbing design?

4 The current size rocket and parachutes have the rocket descending rapidly under drogue, but slowing to under 25 ft/s under main.

Does this design maximize performance?

3 The rocket has been designed to accommodate the payload as well as larger motors as the design is refined.

Are the materials selected the best for this scenario?

4 Carbon fiber is a strong yet lightweight material that we have had success with in years prior. Past experience with phenolic tubing has yielded structural failure.

Any additional comments?

------- Conduct additional tests and review plan to ensure continued safety

Plan for Vehicle Safety Verification and Testing

Page 54: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Physics Day at UND - November 12, 2014 This is a program for local middle school to high school

students to learn about the many different facets of physics.◦ Gave a presentation about rocketry◦ Introduced them to the USLI program and shared our past history

with the competition◦ 200 students attended

Educational Engagement

Page 55: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Outreach at Grand Forks area middle school

Our team is still in the process of scheduling a date to visit the local middle schools.

◦ Give a brief lecture about rocketry◦ We will build and launch balloon rockets◦ Have a Q & A session about rocketry◦ Expect to reach about 30-80 students.

Educational Engagement

Page 56: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

UND Physics and Astronomy Talk -February 23rd.

○ In an hour long talk, we will detail rocketry throughout the ages and hold a demonstration of our current AGSE. The average attendance for these talks is 30-50 students and other interested parties.

Educational Engagement

Page 57: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Two sub-scale launches were performed to verify the recovery system and the main design (fins, nosecone).

There were minor complications in each of the launches.

Vehicle Testing

Page 58: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Length ratio of subscale I: 1:1.75

Length ratio of subscale II : 1:1.4

Fins ratio: 1:2.25

Diameter ratio: 1:2

Scale Launches

Page 59: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Aerotech 1211W-M

● Total Impulse: 460 N/s● Motor Diameter: 1.5 in● Motor Length: 9.82 in

Parachutes:

● Drogue: 30 inches● Main parachute: 28 inches● Payload Parachute: 36 inches

Motor and parachutes

Page 60: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Rocket: ● Length: 60.875 inches● Diameter: 3 inches● Mass with motors: 28.2 ounces● Stability Margin: 1.3

Subscale Launch I

Page 61: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Subscale Launch I Simulation

Apogee: 2815 ft Maximum velocity: 930 ft/s

Page 62: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Subscale Launch I Flight

Deployment of Time (s) Altitude (ft) Velocity (mph)

Drogue 13.65 2804 15

Main parachutes 71.90 600 35

Apogee: 2811 ft.

Page 63: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

● Lack of space● Increased charge● Weakened bond

Flight I Complications

Page 64: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Rocket: ● Length: 73.75 inches● Diameter: 3 inches● Mass with motors: 31.9 ounces● Stability Margin: 2.37

Subscale Launch II

Page 65: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Subscale Launch II Simulation

Apogee: 2801 ft Maximum velocity: 881 ft/s

Page 66: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Subscale Launch II Flight

Deployment of Time (s) Altitude (ft) Velocity (mph)

Drogue 13.6 2619 18

Main parachutes 62.05 600 35

Apogee: 2621 ft.

Page 67: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

● Obstruction when preparing break pin’s holes● Slight wobble during launch● Parachute Complications

Flight II Complications

Page 68: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

In the coming weeks, the team will be working on:

- For the AGSE: Cutting the frame and welding itBuilding of Ignition and lifting systemFinishing the payload acquisition systemPositioning of the different switchesImplementing the electrical system

- For the rocket: Ordering of the rocket cylinders Building of the Fins

Building of the Payload securing

Near-Future Work

Page 69: University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015

Questions?