university of missouri system board of curators resources & planning committee: accountability...
TRANSCRIPT
UMSYSTEM.EDUUMSYSTEM.EDU 1
Resources & Planning Committee
President’s Accountability MeasuresAugust 20, 2009
UMSYSTEM.EDU 2
Strategic Directions
• A roadmap for strengthening and enhancing• teaching and learning• research and discovery• service and engagement• economic development • the administrative functions that support these strategic
themes• Nine goals with detailed enabling strategies• Aligned with campus strategic plans• Report on campus and system office actions during
2009
UMSYSTEM.EDU 3
Efficiency & Effectiveness Report FY 2009
• Commitment to responsible stewardship of University assets and resources
• Cost management $ 37.6 million• Cost avoidance $ 26.6• Revenue enhancement $ 27.0• Strategic reallocation $ 7.1
Total Impact $ 98.3 million• +Build America Bonds 40.0 million• +Benefit changes 12.0 million
UMSYSTEM.EDU 4
Funding/FTE Student FTE Enrollment
University of MissouriEfficiency Measures
FY2001-2009
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009$0
$4,000
$8,000
$12,000
$16,000
$20,000
$24,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
State Appr./FTE Net Tuition/FTE Funding/FTE Adj. for Inflation (HEPI) Total Funding/FTE Adj. for Inflation(CPI)FTE Enrollment
25% Efficiency
Est.
11% Efficiency
UMSYSTEM.EDU 5
President’s Accountability Measures
Background
• President’s initiative to promote transparency and accountability regarding the University’s overall performance
• “A Strategic Direction for the University System” outlined first draft of the measures (October 2008)
UMSYSTEM.EDU 6
President’s Accountability Measures
Measures Aligned with Strategic Directions Five Themes
• Teaching & Learning• Economic Development• Research & Discovery• Community Service & Engagement• Developing & Managing Human, Financial &
Physical Resources
UMSYSTEM.EDU 7
President’s Accountability Measures
Principles of Identifying Measures
• Most meaningful measures under each theme• Common data sources & definitions across
campuses• Externally-validated sources• Comparator peer data availability• Include measures from CBHE Coordinated Plan
and from the Voluntary System of Accountability
UMSYSTEM.EDU 8
President’s Accountability Measures
Process of Developing Measures
• Task Force began in August 2008• Four campuses and UM System represented• UM System IR maintained the official report template• Report template & core measures finished March
2009• Historical data, benchmarks, & comparator peer averages populated
April 2009 & revised July/August 2009• Campuses given option to add campus-specific measures• Campus targets in August 2009
UMSYSTEM.EDU 9
President’s Accountability Measures
Components of Notebook
1. Guide to the President’s Accountability Measures
2. Campus reports: historical data, benchmarks, comparator peer averages, targets, indicators, source
3. Campus comparator peer groups4. Operational definitions and complete data
sources
UMSYSTEM.EDU 10
President’s Accountability MeasuresComponents of the Report
• Three years of historical data• Indicator: green, yellow, red• Campus three-year target• Benchmark (best in class)• Comparator peer average• Source• Voluntary System of Accountability or Coordinated
Plan component • Data definition/notes
UMSYSTEM.EDU 11
President’s Accountability Measures
• Next Step: Outside “audit” of measures• Validity and reasonableness of measures, targets,
benchmarks and peer comparisons
• Annual Process• In collaboration with the campuses, UM System IR
responsible for maintaining & updating report• Annual update shared with Board of Curators at
December meeting• Considered dynamic document