understanding the long-term implications of severe
TRANSCRIPT
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation
Wolfgang Weiss (Germany), UNSCEAR
International Experts’ Meeting on Decommissioning and Remediation after a Nuclear Accident Organized in connection with the implementation of theIAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety
Understanding the Long -Term Implications
of Severe Radiological Accidents (including Infrastructure and Resource Needs)
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 3
Characteristics of the Process
During the remediation process, theapplication of the radiation protectionprinciples „justification “ and „optimization “has to be conducted with great care todeploy remediation actions which are theresult of a balance between objectiveelements (exposure, costs, etc.) andsubjective elements (public perception,anxiety, political pressure, etc.).
PreparednessResponse Recovery
Early Intermediate Late
Planning
Stage
Event/Respons
e Initiation
Crisis
Managemen
t
Consequenc
e
Managemen
t
Transition
to
Recovery
(including
recovery
planning)
Recovery/Long-
term
Rehabilitation
Emergency Exposure Situation
Existing
Exposure
Situation
Emergency Management Timeline
Available information or Stakeholder involvement
Homma 2012
Past experience
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 5
Long -term experience of chronic exposuresituations is readily available from nucleartest sites (Bikini, Maralinga), nuclearaccidents (Kyshtym, Palomares, Chernobyl,Fukushima), or radiological source accidents(Goiaˆnia).
UNSCEARs Chernobyl experience
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 6
Challenges
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 8
The available experience clearly showsthat all dimensions of the daily life of theinhabitants within contaminated areas, aswell as the social and economic activities,are affected resulting in complex situationswhich cannot be managed with radiationprotection considerations alone.
Multiple dimensions
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 9
Remediation actions must address allrelevant dimensions such as health,environmental, economic, social,psychological, cultural, ethical, political ,etc..
Following WHO's definition health is:"A state of complete physical, mental andsocial well-being, and not merely theabsence of disease".
The responsibilities of authorities
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 10
The first priority of strategies implementedby authorities is to protect people with thehighest exposures, and in parallel toreduce all individual exposures to as low asreasonably achievable. This impliesassessments of the dose distribution,comparison of the doses with the referencelevel, and subsequent optimisation ofprotection .
There is a strong need for transparency ofthe underlying processes.
Key elements of implementation strategies
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 11
Clean-up of buildings, remediation of soilsand vegetation, changes in animalhusbandry, monitoring of the environmentand produce, provision of clean foodstuffs,managing of waste (resulting from clean -upor from unmarketable contaminated goods),provision of information, guidance,instruction and equipment (e.g. formeasurements), health surveillance,education of children, information forparticular exposed groups and the public atlarge, etc..
Dose-dependent health effects
Clinical effects• Acute radiation
syndrome• Local injuries
Clinical effects• Acute radiation
syndrome• Local injuries
CancerCancer
Hereditary effects
Hereditary effects
Other• Fetal effects• Cataracts• Cardiovascular
Other• Fetal effects• Cataracts• Cardiovascular
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 12
Late health effects – Chernobyl
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 13
The major health consequences from theradiation exposure of the ARS survivorsremain skin injuries and radiation -inducedcataracts. A high prevalence of nervoussystem diseases among the survivors hasbeen registered . Similarly, there have beenreports of a high percentage ofcardiovascular and gastrointestinal diseases.Among the ARS survivors there have been afew confirmed cases of solid cancer.
Late health effects – Chernobyl
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 14
A substantial increase in the incidence ofthyroid cancer has occurred in the threerepublics since the Chernobyl accidentamong those exposed as children oradolescents. The increase of thyroidcancer among children and adolescentsbegan to appear about 5 years after theaccident and persisted up until 2005.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 15
In order to guide decision -making on publichealth resource management, and given thatthere is a latent period between exposure andthe appearance of any increased incidence instochastic effects, attempts have been madeto predict the health impact on populationsexposed to radiation by applying radiationrisk models to the estimates of populationdose.
Late health effects – Chernobyl
Interpretation of radiation risk projections
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 16
The interpretation and communication ofradiation risk projections is fraught withmany difficulties, and it is not easy tocommunicate the intrinsic scientific limi-tations of attribution of health effectsadequately. There are no biomarkers specificto radiation available and it is not possible tostate scientifically that radiation caused aparticular cancer in an individual . This meansthat in terms of specific individuals, it isimpossible to determine whether theircancers are due to the effects of radiation orto other causes.
Attribution of health effects at low doses
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 17
Due to the great uncertainties in riskestimates at very low doses, UNSCEARdoes not recommend multiplying very lowdoses by large numbers of individuals toestimate numbers of radiation -inducedhealth effects within a population exposedto incremental doses at levels equivalentto or lower than natural background levels.
Options to evaluate long term cancer risks
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 18
Two types of studies are considered byUNSCEAR when evaluating the cancer risk topopulations exposed during the Chernobylaccident:• geographical correlation studies relating
aggregated rates of disease with averageexposure and
• analytical studies ( case-control or cohort )where individual information is used .
Other causes of health effects
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 19
The Chernobyl accident is known to havehad major effects that are not related to theradiation exposure. They include effectsbrought on by anxiety about the future anddistress , and any resulting changes in diet,smoking habits, alcohol consumption andother lifestyle factors, and are essentiallyunrelated to any actual radiation exposure.
Other causes of health effects
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 20
The Chernobyl Forum concluded that stresssymptoms, increased levels of depression,anxiety (including post-traumatic stresssymptoms ), and medically unexplainedphysical symptoms , have been found in theexposed populations compared to controlgroups. Mostly, these conditions weresubclinical and did not meet the criteria forclassification as psychiatric disorders.
Effects of similar nature have been observedafter the Fukushima nuclear accident.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 22
Needs identified by ICRP
• a monitoring record system beestablished under the responsibility ofthe relevant authorities.
• health registries be established for thepopulation residing in the affectedareas.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 23
Needs identified by ICRP
Quantifcation of the intrinsic uncertainties isan integral part of the estimation of theannual doses. Whenever possible, annualdoses should be reported as a distribution ofpossible values rather than as single pointvalues. Radioactive residues are usuallyunevenly distributed, creating situations ofheterogeneous prolonged exposure. Theseneed to be addressed on a case-by-casebasis by making realistic assumptions aboutthe pattern of people's exposure.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 24
In most cases in long -term exposuresituations, the level of exposure is drivenby individual behaviour .
It is an obligation of the authorities tofacilitate processes to allow inhabitants todefine, optimise, and apply their own(„self-help “ ) protective actions.
Needs identified by ICRP
Thank you for your attention
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 26
Contact details: [email protected]