UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

March 10, 2011

Rapid Acquisition

OSD CAPECost Assessment and Program Evaluation

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D

How to not make the SD the PM for rapid acquisition items

Purpose

2

• Current process requires senior leader involvement How to balance urgent needs against

the risk the system is willing to takeHow fast is it required, how much is the

department willing to pay, and how much oversight is required

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D C A P E

Current Acquisition ModelS

enio

r L

ead

er I

nvo

lvem

ent

Tota

l P

rog

ram

Co

sts

Complexity & Risk

TheaterLocal Cmd

SAE

MDA

BTR

Theater Funding

ATR

OCO

POM

COTS/GOTSPO Integration

Days Weeks Months Quarters Year Years

DSD

SD

S&T at Government Labs

Using Existing Authsand Contracts

5000CAT I

Easy with No Risk Difficult with Risk

Need to Delivery Time

ProgrammingRe-ProgrammingYear of Execution

To shorten time requires more sr ldr involvement

MRAP

SDB/C-130Laser JDAM

SM-6

MC-12 Liberty

GH

JIEDDO

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D C A P E

Rapid Acquisition Requirements Process

4

Identify Validate Prioritize

Capability Requirement Validation Pick a Solution

Develop Demonstrate

ProcureDemonstrate

Procure

Procure

OR

ORSustain & Transfer

Sustain &Transition

OR

Then Integrate to a Service or Agency

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D C A P E

How Can a Program Get an EZ-Pass?

5

• High priority JUON that must be tracked• Requires funding

Initial (break another program, colorless?) O&S costs must be signed up for

• Requires Service support or buy-in• Requires breaking thru the risk adverse nature

of the system it is being procured from• Government must take on a large integration

role Established relationships with contractors Team in place

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D C A P E

Rapid Acquisition Future Developments

6

• Standing up a DoD-wide program officeCurrent organizations are commodity specific Ad-hoc from current program offices

• Streamlining how the requirements come inJCIDS is not nimble enough How to create a more open process

• Appropriating colorless multi-year fundingKeeping Congress informed Transition/transfer to services or agencies

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D Laser JDAM

7

• CSAF directed QRC--Weapons to GWOT in 15 month

• Requirements:

• CSAF go-ahead Mar 07; Requirements signed Apr 07

• Requirements did not change even with addition of Navy

• Technology:

• Boeing initial investment, development and demonstration

• Funding:

• Initial R&D funding ($6M) from Warfighter Rapid Acquisition Program in 1 month

• Initial production funds ($20M) reprogrammed in 2 months

• Follow-on funding kept pace with need

• $6M R&D in 4 months; Navy funding in 8 months

• Team:

• Existing JDAM program office used for LJDAM

• Supported tailored processes

Enablers• Rapid receipt of initial funding• Agile support from testers• Accelerated decision process

Sep 2006 CENTAF Urgent Need for Engaging Fast Moving Targets

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D Precision Lethality MK-82

8

2009 JUON for Very Low Collateral Damage Weapon• Requirements: RAC directed QRC for USCENTCOM

• Direction from JRAC Mar 10, R&D started May 10. Requirements finalized Aug 10, 4 months into effort.

• Penetration and forward fuzing not critical to low collateral damage. Added 4 months to development effort.

• Technology:

• Composite technology integrated on a fielded system, JDAM

• Funding: Unconventional funding sources

• SPR leads to reprogramming of $11M SAF/AQ funds for tech maturation through an AFRL ongoing effort

• $29.5M RDT&E OCO money provided Aug 10

• $20M RDT&E & $31M production provided by JRAC Oct 10

• Team: AAC & AFRL Lab partnership key to success

• AFRL led tech maturation effort w/transition to AAC

• New AAC program office stood up. Fulfills Sys Integrator role

• Organic system level design and system logistics support

Enablers• Early Funding – Available for

effort• People – Committed to

Warfighter• Flexibility• Rapid decision making ability • Adapt to change daily• Agile support from testers

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Back Up Slides

9

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D

10

JCTDBreakfastClub

450 FLMs

FY06 FY07 FY08

MS C

1 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr 2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr2 Qtr 3 Qtr 4 Qtr

Technology Transition

AFRL Technology Development Program(25 Arena, Sled & Howitzer Tests)

JCTDIntegration/TestProgram

Live Flight Test

Static Live Fire Tests

Weaponeer Workshops

3 Phase Military UtilityAssessment

1 Qtr

Contract Award

Guided Test Vehicle Flights

FLM’sDD-250’d

Original Fielding Schedule (50)

50

Residuals Sustainment

Focused Lethality Munition (FLM)

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D

15 Month Timeline

Laser JDAM

11

J A S O N D J F M D

J A M J J A S O N

JFY07 FY08 FY09

Direction

F

DON 1st 50Requirement

AF 1st 50Requirement

M

AF 400thRequirement

M

AF R&D $

AF Prod $

Navy Rqmt

Final AF $

50 100 200

300Long-Lead Procurement

50 100

AF Units

Navy Units

FDR1

FDR2

FCA

Producibility Enhancements

FAAT 1/OUE

FAAT 2

Stationary Target Eval

Obj A/C Integration and Moving/Maneuvering Target Eval

PRR1

NavyFY08 Funds

PRR2 (Elbit)

PRR2 (ESA)

1st OperationalEngagement

Milestones

Contract Actions - UCA - Definitization

Qualification - Design

- Logistics

- Software (Blk 7)

- AF Testing

- Navy Testing

Operational UnitProduction

Fielding

400

200

FDR1/PRR1/FAAT 1 – SDD+ ConfigurationFDR2/PRR2/FAAT 2 – LRIP Configuration

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D

BLU-129/B QRC Schedule

12

AF

RAA

FY2010 FY2011

50 RAA

M NJ A S O D J F M A JMM A J A S NO D J F MFY2012

SRR CDR

Arenas

PHST

Warhead Aging Study

TRR

Design Margin Lethality

SledDesign Margin Sleds

A/C Flt Certification

EOD Eval

Flt Clear(O)

Final TDP Post-IOC TRR

Objective Live Flights

Risk Reduction CFP - Captive Flt ProfileCTV - Controlled Test Vehicle DVT - Design Verification TestingEGTV - Environmental Guided Test VehicleIM – Insensitive MunitionsPHST – Packaging, Handling, Storage, TransportationRAA – Required Assets AvailableTDP – Technical Data Package

WARHEAD MANUFACTURING

5-month post-IOC Transition from QRC

CTV

Fielding Recommendation

RISK REDUCTIONANDQRC RDT&E

DIRECTIONRQMNTSFUNDINGCONTRACTS

RR CA

JRAC Direction

RDT&E OCO $

AFRL $

Sled

4.5-month RR

Ground Rules/Assumptions• No key requirements changes• BLU-129 ~ legacy MK82 (except roll inertia)• No JDAM OFP change allowed• Receive IM waiver for initial fielding • Receive high priority on test range • JDAM / LJDAM kits and fuzes are GFE• Warhead characterization, design margin and

objective testing post-IOC• Paveway II certification dates TBD

AF Rqmt’s

DT/OT OUE Rpt

J

JTCG/MEWeaponeering

DoN Rqmt’s

Capability Transition Review

Closeout

Time Now

RDT&E CA

PDR

CFP

NNMSB Approval

Fit Checks

Arena

Structural Data Package

EGTVs

Case DVTs

Qual

AFSEO

FAI/PCA

RDT&E/Prod Reprog $

TRL Readiness Review

Initial TDP

8-month IOC

McAlester Qual

Margin DVTs

Navy safe Sep/Cats & Traps

Navy Fleet Clearance

E3/HERO

PRR

Prod CA

USN Exp Quals

IM/Haz Class Tests

Warhead Surveillance Plan

USN Flt Test

Environmental /Safety

Lethality Evaluation Point

Test Clear (T)

Tech Orders

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

O S D Focused Lethality Munition (FLM)

13

2006 Urgent Need for Low Collateral Damage Weapon• SECAF directed JCTD--Weapons to GWOT in 18 mos

• Requirements: Well defined from JCTD process

• Limited blast zone and focused lethality

• Requirements were fluid. Penetration requirement reduced

• Technology:

• Composite technology integrated on a fielded system, SDB

• Funding: Out of cycle JCTD

• SAF/AQ found $10M. Initial $6M went directly to AFRL, $3.6M managed by AAC for AFRL.

• Follow on funding from misc sources including $10M BTR from SDB I and SDB II.

• Team: AAC & AFRL Lab partnership key to success

• AFRL led tech maturation effort w/transition to AAC

• SDB program office supplemented for FLM effort

• Partnered w/National Labs for composite design expertise

Enablers• Accelerated Funding• People & Teamwork • Leadership • Vision, Strategy, Focus• Accepting failure and taking risk• Mature Technologies• Clear and Valid Requirement• Agile support from testers