uir.ulster.ac.ukuir.ulster.ac.uk/39851/1/cnp1460 nurse-led follow-up author copy (1)… · web...
TRANSCRIPT
Cancer Nursing Practice
Evidence and practice/service evaluation
Development, integration, and evaluation of nurse-led follow-up across five tumour sites, at a cancer unit in Northern IrelandSemple C, Lynas C (2017) Development, integration, and evaluation of nurse-led follow-up across five tumour sites, at a cancer unit in Northern Ireland. Cancer Nursing Practice.
date of submission 30 June 2017; date of acceptance 29 September 2017; doi 10.7748/cnp.2017.e1460Cherith Semple
Macmillan head and neck clinical nurse specialist/ Honorary Research Fellow, South Eastern Health
and Social Care Trust, Cancer Services, Ulster Hospital, Ulster University, Institute of Nursing &
Health Research, Belfast, Northern Ireland
Caroline Lynas
Macmillan service improvement lead, South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, [?Belfast]
Correspondence
Conflict of interest
None declared
Peer review
This article has been subject to external double-blind peer review and checked for plagiarism using automated software
We would like to thank clinical nurse specialists Martina Finn, Joanne Ogburn, Patricia Thompson,
and Paula Dempster, at South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust (SEHSCT), who were integral to
this service redesign and evaluation. We would also like to thank Dr Moyra Mills for facilitating the
focus group, and the staff of the SEHSCT safe and effective care department, for administering the
questionnaires and collating the findings.
Abstract
The traditional model of medical oncology follow-up clinics has been challenged in recent years, partly because it cannot meet the individual needs of the growing cancer survivor population. Greater personalisation of follow-up care is required to manage cancer survivors’ clinical, psychosocial, and practical care, and many organisations are attempting to achieve this through nurse-led follow-up services. This article describes a service development project, in a cancer unit in Northern Ireland, that developed, integrated, and evaluated nurse-led follow-up clinics for five tumour groups. Evaluation was undertaken through a focus group and surveys, and the article discusses the findings that suggest successful integration of nurse-led clinics requires comprehensive planning and preparation, including professional development, and risk stratification of patients, and that nurse-led clinics enhance continuity of care, and promote patient empowerment and self-management strategies. The article concludes that nurses can deliver cancer follow-up services effectively, and are well placed to provide comprehensive survivorship care for patients.
cancer, cancer nursing practice, living with and beyond cancer, nurse-led follow-up, survivorship
IntroductionAn estimated two million people in England are living with and beyond cancer (National Cancer
Survivorship Initiative (NCSI) 2013), and this number is projected to rise to 3.4 million by 2030
(Maddams et al 2012). Similar trends are reported in Northern Ireland (NI), with 63,000 people living
with cancer, and an expectation that this will increase to over 100,000 in the same timeframe
[Macmillan Cancer Support 2017]. This growing population of cancer survivors, many of whom have
co-morbidities, some of which are related to their cancer treatment, places a significant demand on
health and social care services. Further, while more people are surviving cancer, this does not mean
that they all are living well (Khan et al 2011).
The traditional model of oncology follow-up clinics has been challenged in recent years, due to
recognition that current systems cannot meet the demands of the ever-increasing cancer
population, and that many cancer survivors attending these clinics have unmet needs (Kent et al
2012). Further, research highlights a feeling of abandonment during the transition from cancer
patient to survivor (Davies and Batehup 2011). This is partly because traditional oncology follow-up
clinics focused mainly on detection of recurrence, and less on health-related quality of life (QOL)
issues (Jefford et al 2013). There is a need, therefore, for transformation of follow-up services for
people affected by cancer.
People’s needs, and situations, vary, therefore greater personalisation of follow-up care is
required to manage their clinical, psychosocial, and practical care effectively. There is increasing
emphasis on providing person-centred and risk-stratified follow-up care, supported by holistic need
assessments (HNAs), and individual care plans, and empowering patients to take a more active role
in their recovery (NCSI 2013). Within this context, many organisations are providing direct access to
nurse-led follow-up services.
Nurse-led care continues to expand, with the recognised extended role of nurses, combined with
the need to modernise health care services, and provide cost-effective care. Caird et al (2010) found
that nurse-led interventions, provided or led by nurses, positively affected management of patients
with long-term conditions, including cancer. The authors concluded that nurse-led care can be more
beneficial than medical-led care, in terms of physical outcomes, psychosocial aspects, and patient
satisfaction, and does not impair cancer patients’ long-term survival. Despite the rapid growth in
nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics, development has been ad hoc, and poorly evaluated (Farrell
2015), and there is a lack of evidence on how to develop effective nurse-led clinics, and demonstrate
meaningful improvement in service-delivery from professionals’ perspectives.
Transforming Cancer Follow Up (TCFU) was introduced in NI in 2010 [Northern Ireland Cancer
Network, 2010], and is the result of a strategic partnership between Macmillan Cancer Support, the
Health and Social Care Board, and the Public Health Agency. The aim of TCFU is to test new models
of cancer follow up across NI, focusing on improving the quality of patients’ aftercare experience,
promoting health and wellbeing, reducing inefficiencies in hospital follow up, and enhancing service
coordination and integration. Part of the redesign and transformation of follow-up cancer care at the
South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust (SEHSCT), one of the five integrated Health and Social
Care Trusts in NI, was the development and delivery of nurse-led follow up across five tumour sites.
Each year at SEHSCT, 2,200 new patients are diagnosed with cancer, and 2,600 oncology
treatments are delivered. This article describes a service development project which aimed to
develop, implement, and evaluate nurse-led cancer follow up, as part of a service redesign
programme. The objectives were to:
1.Develop and implement pathways for nurse-led cancer follow up across five tumour groups,
namely, head and neck, colorectal, prostate, haematology, and gynaecological.
2. Explore clinical nurse specialists’ (CNSs’) views of developing and delivering nurse-led cancer
follow-up clinics.
3. Determine patients’ views and experience of nurse-led cancer follow up clinics.
4. Ascertain consultants’ views of CNSs undertaking follow-up clinics, within their tumour-specific
cancer teams.
MethodA focus group and surveys were used to generate data for the evaluation phase of the service-
development project, which was led by a Macmillan service improvement lead, and CNS. This project
was approved and supported by the SEHSCT quality improvement department, called safe and
effective care. Data were collected between October 2016 and March 2017. The procedure, sample,
and data analysis are outlined separately for each objective.
Objective 1: development of nurse-led cancer follow-up serviceComprehensive planning was an essential part of the project, particularly in relation to the
advanced practice roles of the CNSs who would be leading the follow-up clinics, including clinical
assessment with examination for tumour detection, and ordering relevant investigations. It was
essential that the CNSs identified potential deficits in their skill and knowledge base, and structures
were put in place to support their professional development before the start of the nurse-led clinics.
During the development phase there was only one nurse per tumour group conducting the clinics,
and therefore no clinics were held during study and annual leave periods.
The Macmillan service improvement lead, and the trust’s cancer services manager, worked
alongside, and supported, each CNS individually, to develop and integrate the new model of follow-
up care for their tumour-specific group. The following framework was used to ensure the CNSs were
equipped for, and competent to undertake, these new roles:
Professional development. The CNSs undertook a health assessment accredited module at the
local university, and had advanced communication skills training.
Work-based learning. The CNSs were all senior nurses with more than three years’ experience
with their tumour group. Before commencing nurse-led clinics, each CNS worked alongside
tumour-specific medical consultants, which was an opportunity to gain knowledge about disease-
specific cancer management.
Professional and clinical competencies. CNSs’ professional competencies were assessed by the
cancer services manager using a schedule which included values and attitudes on professional
accountability, maintaining standards, and patient safety underpinning safe and effective nurse-
led clinics. The CNSs’ clinical competencies were assessed by senior, tumour-specific medical
consultants. Each CNS had a skills- and knowledge-based competency schedule, relevant to their
area of practice, which included skills in clinical assessment (history taking, physical examination,
assessing response to treatment, assessing toxicity), and knowledge of clinical management,
including ordering, and interpreting, relevant investigations. The CNSs were ratified to lead the
nurse-led clinics only when deemed professionally and clinically competent.
Documentation. Trust guidelines and protocols were developed for each tumour group, and these
were authorised by the senior management team.
Medical support. Face-to-face nurse-led clinics initially ran concurrently with medical clinics, to
ensure clinical support was available if needed.
Organisation infrastructure. This included set-up of clinic templates, physical location of clinics,
dictation devices, and secretarial support.
Risk stratification: Each tumour-specific team developed and agreed pathways that included risk
stratification, to identify which patients were lower risk, and therefore suitable for nurse-led
follow up. For example, the head and neck team defined lower-risk patients as those who had
reached two-years post-treatment and disease-free. The premise and necessity of risk
stratification in each tumour-specific team will be re-evaluated on completion of the project, but
it was necessary to include this at the start of the project to minimise barriers from medical staff,
increase CNSs’ confidence before they started the nurse-led clinics, and to manage capacity.
Each site-specific CNS embedded the following survivorship principles into their clinic:
Complete holistic needs assessment.
Monitor for disease relapse, and detection of new cancers.
Monitor for late-effects of treatment, provide high-quality advice, and/or signpost to relevant
services.
Health promotion.
Active engagement of patients in their own health and wellbeing.
Education on self-surveillance.
Ensure patients are aware of point of contact, and rapid access to specialist advice if required.
Improve waiting times.
Table 1 shows the format of the five, tumour-specific nurse-led follow-up clinics.
Table 1: Format of nurse-led cancer clinics for each tumour site
Tumour site Clinic format Risk-stratification criteria for
nurse-led follow-up (*shared care
between clinical nurse specialist
and consultant)
Grade of
clinical
nurse
specialis
t
Time allocated
for review
Head and neck
Face to face
Treated surgically
Two years’ post treatment (no disease relapse)
Band 7 20 min
Colorectal Face to face
Two years’ post treatment (stage 1-2)
Band 7 20 min
Prostate Face to face
Watchful waiting, active surveillance (*), raised PSA [Prostate Specific
Band 7 20 min
Antigen], negative biopsy, hormone treatment
Haematology Face to face
Two years’ post treatment
Band 7 20mins
Gynaecological
Telephone Six months (stage 1A grade 1 or 2) (*)
Band 7 20 min
The duration of each nurse-led clinic appointment was 20 minutes, compared to an average of 10
minutes in the traditional medical-led follow-up clinics. The number of patients attending the clinics
vary between two and five, depending on the needs, and clinical capacity, of each tumour-specific
patient group. Since the format of the gynaecological clinic is telephone-based, there is no physical
examination, but the following content is covered with the aid of a proforma:
Results of tumour markers.
Holistic needs assessment findings.
Signposting/referral as required, for example for counselling, incontinence adviser, or
psychosexual counselling services.
Education about signs and symptoms of recurrence.
Rapid access policy.
Objective 2: Explore the CNSs’ views of developing, implementing, and delivering nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics
A focus group, comprising of four CNSs who deliver the nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics, was
conducted by an experienced qualitative researcher working in cancer services, fully appraised, and
involved in TCFU in NI, but independent of the local cancer team. The second author provided each
CNS with written information on background, rationale, timing, and location of the focus group.
Ground rules about participants’ opinions, and confidentiality, were set at the start of the focus
group. A topic guide was devised with the following five broad topics:
Preparation and planning.
Key enablers during development phase.
Perceived benefits of nurse-led clinics.
Challenges confronted.
Effects and highlights of nurse-led clinics.
Detailed field notes were made by a management interim in cancer services, who was also
unknown to the CNS participants, who recorded quotes or important phrases, main points and
themes, for each question discussed, as well as inconsistencies and non-verbal information or
activities. The experienced qualitative researcher noted the salient points.
Immediately after the focus group, the group facilitator (the experienced qualitative researcher)
and the assistant (the management interim for cancer services), had a debriefing, and noted
emerging themes and interpretations. Soon after the focus group the field notes were reviewed, and
a draft report was produced, which included relevant quotes. The draft report was shared with the
CNSs participants for verification, accuracy, and resonance of the data. The findings were then
finalised.
A short self-developed questionnaire was also completed at the commencement of the focus
group to capture the CNSs’ demographic details.
Objective 3: Ascertain patients’ views and experience of nurse-led cancer follow-up clinicsA patient satisfaction survey was devised by two senior nurses with oncology, research, and
service development experience. Feedback on length, structure, and format was sought from the
five CNSs who deliver the clinics, and to ensure the questions were representative of their tumour
group. The final version of the survey comprised of 18 questions, and four subsections covering
demographics, care received, patient enablement to ‘manage your health’, and overall satisfaction
of the service and suggestions for improvement. The survey included open (n=4) and closed-ended
questions (n=14), to generate quantitative and qualitative data.
A live-status check was performed on all patients who attended the nurse-led cancer follow-up
clinics from September 2015 to August 2016, from which 210 potential participants were identified.
They were sent a copy of the survey in September 2016, with a cover letter highlighting that their
confidentiality would be maintained. This may seem a small sample size across five tumour groups,
but this service development project included one nurse per tumour group, each commencing a new
service for patients that were stratified as low-risk for disease relapse. Anonymity for respondents
was protected, as patients were not asked to include their names, and a free-post return envelope
was enclosed with the survey.
SPSS v 22.0 was used to analysis the quantitative data, and the qualitative data were presented
verbatim, grouped, and themed.
Objective 4: Ascertain consultants’ views of nurses performing nurse-led cancer follow-up clinicsAn online, anonymous survey was developed by the same two senior nurses, and questions were
reviewed and refined based on feedback from other CNSs involved in the project. This final survey
comprised nine questions, eight of which were Likert-style, and one of which was open ended, and
was administered through Survey Monkey.
All 17 SEHSCT consultants working with the five, site-specific CNSs delivering the nurse-led follow-
up clinics, were sent the survey to their trust email address. SPSS v 22.0 was used to analyse the
descriptive, quantitative data.
FindingsCNSs’ views of developing, implementing, and delivering nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics
Four of the five CNSs who lead the clinics participated in the focus group. One was unable to
attend due to a sudden family bereavement. All four participants were registered nurses for over 20
years, had worked as cancer CNSs for a median of 11 to 15 years, and had a BSc degree in nursing.
One CNS had a doctoral degree. They represented head and neck, haematology, prostate, and
gynaecology tumour sites.
Four broad themes were identified from the focus group data, essential planning and preparation
required, challenges to overcome, key enablers, and benefits of the new service. These are discussed
below.
Essential planning and preparation required
Participants considered professional development, in the form of undertaking an accredited
health assessment module, and having in-depth and up-to-date knowledge on managing the site-
specific disease, as an essential part of the planning phase. They also reported the need to gain skills,
and to feel competent in conducting relevant physical examinations for detecting recurrence. This
included having the opportunity to shadow medical consultants, and undergo a period of
observation and feedback.
Another important facet of the planning phase was to agree supervision and mentoring from
medical consultants when starting the clinics, and ensure risk-stratification was incorporated for
patients in lower risk categories.
The planning phase enabled collation of essential documents, including trust guidelines, written
information for patients, and letter templates, and the participants reported the need to agree on
physical environment and resources, including clinic rooms with the necessary equipment, and
administrative support for setting up clinic templates, booking clinics, and typing letters. Participants
advocated that CNSs should consider each of these components before establishing nurse-led cancer
follow-up clinics.
Key enablers
These were identified as CNSs demonstrating a passion for, and commitment to, service redesign,
support from medical consultants as champions of change, support from management in cancer
services, having an experienced and skilled workforce to undertake nurse-led clinics, and strategic
drivers, such as TCFU in NI, and the NCSI in the UK.
Challenges to overcome
The most common challenge identified by the participants was lack of secretarial support, which
resulted in an unnecessary workload, for example allocating appointments and retrieving charts.
This is being addressed, and an administrative support worker is being recruited. Some participants
identified resource issues, such as lack of clinic rooms, and suggested that more planning time was
required.
Another challenge was managing additional workload, which for some CNSs meant reconfiguring
their job plan, with less available time for direct support of patients and families in the inpatient
setting. Some CNSs shared that engagement from medical colleagues was initially problematic, and
this was centred around their perceived lack of clarity about legal responsibility for medical clinicians
if recurrence was undetected by a CNS. Inequity also existed as some of the CNSs had completed
additional training, enabling them to request imaging investigations such as CT and ultrasound scans
within agreed protocols.
Participants felt strongly about maintaining the ‘essence’ of nursing in the nurse-led follow-up
clinics, especially if the clinics were perceived as a way of meeting waiting list targets. There was a
consensus that this new model should demonstrate added value for patients, with a holistic, person-
centred approach, and a focus on survivorship.
Finally, some participants said they lacked confidence initially, but that supervision and
professional support improved this.
Benefits of nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics
The participants considered that delivering nurse-led clinics added to their professionalism and
job satisfaction. Before attending the nurse-led clinics, patients complete a holistic needs
assessment, and the CNSs highlighted the value of this to identify unmet needs, and enable timely
referral to other members of the team, such as physiotherapists, psychologists, or dietitians. Longer
clinic appointments provided additional time to address patients’ psychosocial needs, and educate
them about disease surveillance, and health promotion. They also reported improved continuity of
follow-up care, due to seeing the same CNS at review appointments. Finally, the CNSs perceived
that patients were generally seen on time, and there was a reduced waiting time, compared to the
traditional model of follow-up care.
Patients’ views and experience of nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics114 surveys were returned, giving a response rate of 54%. Findings are reported under the four
subsections of the survey.
Participant demographics
Table 2 shows the participants’ demographic details.
Table 2: Demographics of patients who completed the patient satisfaction survey
Gender Male = 59 (53%)
Female = 53 (47%)
Age 45 and under = 2 (2%)
46 - 60 = 22 (20%)
61 - 75 = 50 (45%)
over 75 = 37 (33%)
Tumour site Head and neck = 11 (10%)
Colorectal = 29 (26%)
Prostate = 28 (25%)
Haematology = 17 (15%)
Gynaecological = 26 (23%)
Care and information received
All patients attending the nurse-led clinics completed a validated HNA tool. Those with head and
neck cancer completed a disease-specific tool, the Patient Concern Inventory [Rogers et al 2009),
while those in the other tumour groups completed the Cancer Concern Checklist [Macmillan Cancer
Support 2017). The nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics were conducted face-to-face in outpatients
(n=101, 89%), apart from the gynaecological service (n=13, 11%) which was telephone based. Of
those who had face-to-face follow-up visits, three-quarters (n=60, 74%) reported they had a physical
examination as part of their review.
Most respondents reported that they discussed previous treatment (n=88, 96%), results of blood
tests or investigations (n=91, 93%), current physical problems (n=87, 94%), new symptoms (n=83,
94%), further planned investigations and appointments (n=87, 96%), and how to contact the
specialist service between formal review appointments if problems arise (n= 93, 95%), during the
follow-up session.
Managing your health (patient enablement)
Participants were asked to identify the three most frequently reported cancer-related concerns,
out of a list of 15 items, that they sought advice on during their nurse-led clinic appointments. The
most frequent concerns were fear of the cancer returning (n=33, 38%), tiredness/fatigue (n=27,
32%), and ability to manage day-to-day activities (n=22, 26%).
There was an emphasis on promoting self-management during the follow-up visits, which is
shown in Table 3, and most participants were given adequate information to enable them to
understand their illness, keep healthy, cope and adjust to their cancer, and access their specialist
team.
Table 3: Support and information provided at nurse-led follow-up clinic to enable self-
management
Yes
n= (percentage of those who
answered the question)
No
n= (percentage of those who
answered the question)
Understand your illness, including the side-effects of treatment
88 (98%) 2 (2%)
Keep yourself healthy 100 (99%) 1 (1%)
Cope and adjust to life after a cancer diagnosis
87 (98%) 2 (2%)
Access your team if you have a cancer-related concern
86 (95%) 5 (5%)
Access support services, such as counselling, benefits advice
57 (86%) 9 (14%)
When respondents were asked how attending the nurse-led clinic affected their confidence in
managing their health, the results were overwhelmingly positive (Figure 1).
Figure 1: How attending the nurse-led clinic affected patients’ confidence to manage their health
Very co
nfident
Fairly co
nfident
Unsure
Not very
confident
Not at a
ll confident
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
No. o
f res
pond
ents
Consultants views of nurses-led cancer follow-up clinicsTen of the 17 medical consultants completed the online survey, giving a response rate of 59%.
Most (n=9, 90%) had no concerns or reservations about transferring patients from medical to nurse-
led follow-up, and identified disadvantages of medical-led follow-up, including overbooked clinics
(n=7, 70%), patients not seen on time (n=8, 80%), rushed consultations (n=6, 60%), and lack of
opportunity to address QOL issues (n=8, 80%). The consultants recognised that review clinics should
address a range of survivorship issues, and this is illustrated in Figure 2. Response options were yes,
no, and unsure (see below).
Figure 2: Important issues to address in cancer review clinics
Patien
t educati
on on self-m
anage
ment
Fear o
f recu
rrence
Phsyical
symptoms
Emotional s
ymptoms
Finan
ical co
ncerns
Healthy li
ving
Work-rel
ated iss
ues0123456789
10
Yes No Unsure
Consultants were asked what, if any, measures increased their confidence in the transition from
medical-led to nurse-led follow-up clinics, and their responses are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Factors that increase consultants’ confidence in transition to nurse-led clinics
02468
10
The top two potential benefits of nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics, according to the consultants,
were more time to provide psychological support (n=8, 80%), and the opportunity for patients to
raise QOL issues. The two main disadvantages were greater potential for burnout of consultants
because they are managing a more complex patient caseload (n=5, 50%), and added demands
caused by providing support for CNSs leading the clinics (n=5, 50%). Half of the consultants were’
very satisfied’, and two were ‘satisfied’ with the current nurse-led follow-up provision in their area
of practice, while three were ‘unsure’. None of the consultants where dissatisfied, or very
dissatisfied with the nurse-led clinics.
DiscussionAt a time of straitened resources in healthcare provision, we cannot afford to make poor choices
in service delivery. Without the right evaluation, it is difficult to know which innovations are worth
adopting. The costs of implementing untested innovations, and ignoring lessons learned elsewhere,
are substantial (Lamont et al 2016). Nurse-led follow-up for cancer patients is a complex
intervention, with many interrelated components, as both the profession, and the process of
delivery, continue to evolve. Development and integration of nurse-led cancer follow-up in this
cancer unit was multi-faceted, therefore the evaluation incorporates findings from the three main
stakeholders, patients, CNSs, and consultants.
The findings demonstrate that fundamental steps in the successful development and integration
of nurse-led clinics are adequate planning, and methodical preparation. Staff professional
development, work-based learning, competencies, documentation, medical support, organisational
infrastructure, and patient risk stratification, are core elements that should be considered during
development, and could be used as a framework to guide this essential phase. Careful attention
must be paid to professional development to ensure that nurses are adequately equipped for the
extended role. Findings from this evaluation suggests there is a need for a period of learning and
adjustment before CNSs feel confident to lead follow-up services.
Farrell (2016) divides the drivers for initiating nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics into two main
categories, to meet patients’ needs, and to promote efficiency in service delivery. The TCFU in NI
[Northern Ireland Cancer Network, 2010] has this dual focus, recognising that people with cancer
were not having their needs addressed within traditional, medical-led follow-up services, and the
increased pressures on clinical services. Irrespective of the drivers for change, it is important that the
following survivorship components are an integral part of nurse-led cancer follow-up care, to ensure
patients’ needs are central, and that standards of care are based on their needs:
Provision of adequate education, and sign-posting information, to enable patients to take
responsibility for their care.
Sufficient time and encouragement/prompts, such as HNA, to enable patients to raise questions
and concerns.
Health promotion.
Emotional support.
Contact details of a person patients can contact when needed.
The model of care delivered and evaluated here was nurse-led, rather than ‘nurse-alone’, care,
which is an important distinction. For CNSs to function in a nurse-led role requires the support of the
multi-professional team, with the medical consultant as a pivotal team member. In this project, close
collaboration between the CNSs and medical consultants was embedded in the planning and
initiating phase, and included an agreed risk stratification approach for each tumour site team,
completion of clinical competency framework between CNSs and tumour-specific consultants, and
mentoring/shadowing.
One of the concerns about the evolution of nurse-led follow up is the effect on CNSs’ existing
roles, and the risk of diluting the therapeutic effect of nursing through greater emphasis on the
technical aspects of clinical care (Richardson et al 2002). To effectively undertake this extended role,
CNSs must be able to combine technical aspects of clinical care, with compassionate person-centred
care. Although some of the CNSs in this service evaluation acknowledged the need to reconfigure
their job plans, resulting in less direct contact with inpatients, at the same time they reported how
this extended role increased their job satisfaction, and enhanced their professional role as nurses.
The CNSs recognised the importance of enhancing and widening the breadth of service delivery at
the nurse-led follow-up visits, compared to the traditional medical follow-up care, and focusing on
patient education, empowerment, and health promotion. Nurses have an important role to play in
follow-up care, are well placed to undertake this, and can deliver survivorship care effectively (NCSI
2013), and nurse-led clinics offer them the opportunity to do this.
Patients and medical consultants agreed that nurse-led follow-up provides an opportunity for
clinical assessment of response to treatment, and psychological support, patient empowerment and
education. The British Medical Association (2015) highlighted the considerable benefits of working in
partnership with patients to empower them to take more control over their health, and to make
informed decisions about what services to access when in need of care, therefore supporting them
to become effective collaborators in their health care. Empowerment is an important consideration
for future post-treatment management of patients with cancer, because of the increasing number of
survivors, with wide ranging physical and psychological challenges.
The medical consultants in this evaluation were keenly aware of the shortcomings of medical-led
follow-up, including hurried clinics and lack of continuity, which translates into consultations that are
less conducive to patients expressing their concerns or asking questions. Despite this, the literature
suggests that, in the UK, Australia, and the US, most oncologists prefer oncologist-based models of
follow-up care, instead of delegating, or sharing this responsibility with primary care or CNSs
(Jeffords et al 2013). However, CNSs and nurse practitioners consistently express enthusiasm for
involvement in survivorship care, in a supportive environment, and welcome the opportunity
develop nurse-led follow-up clinics (Wells et al 2015). Given the apparent opposing views within
the literature, it is important to focus on key enablers for successful implementation of nurse-led
clinics, such as structured pathways, a skilled and experienced workforce, identifying champions
for change, and CNSs who can demonstrate leadership, passion, and commitment to service
redesign.
Nurse-led cancer follow-up is a complex intervention, and it is challenging to extract precisely
what components add to its effectiveness. However, this evaluation highlights some important
aspects that are valued by patients, and explain why they considered their experience of nurse-led
cancer follow-up clinics positively, for example continuity of care, complemented by the
development of rapport, and establishment of a trusting relationship with the nurses. Additional
aspects highlighted by patients were evidence of expert knowledge, and relevant information
provision by the CNSs. Importantly, all patient participants wanted to continue with nurse-led
follow-up. It is clear that giving patients sufficient time to explore and discuss their concerns, in
addition to the therapeutic value of continuity and good communication, are pivotal to delivery of
effective nurse-led clinics (Faithful and Hunt 2005).
Limitations The findings of this service evaluation should be interpreted with caution, as they reflect a small-
scale project in one cancer unit. The patient data were collected using a self-designed, non-validated
survey, which has inherent pitfalls, including positive bias, and patient satisfaction is not always
linked to quality improvement. Critics could argue that improved satisfaction with nurse-led clinics is
attributable to reduction in waiting times, or longer consultation times, rather than to the care
provided.
The non-response rate was 46% for the patient survey, and 41% for the consultant survey, which
is relatively high, and no information on non-respondents was collected. It could be argued that non-
respondents hold less favourable views on nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics, adding positive bias to
the findings. Further, the authors did not undertake an economic comparison between nurse-led
and medical-led follow-up, therefore cost-effectiveness was not evaluated.
ConclusionTraditional models of cancer follow-up care often do not address patients’ survivorship needs, and
recent cancer policies recommend reviewing current service provision, and considering innovative
ways of addressing the needs of the increasing numbers of cancer survivors, within a survivorship
framework. The findings of this service evaluation suggest that nurses can develop and integrate
patient-focused, nurse-led cancer follow-up services effectively, and are well placed to provide
comprehensive survivorship care. The project has allowed CNSs to demonstrate their value to the
organisation, through leading, developing, and delivering care endorsed by patients and medical
colleagues. However, there is a need for further research, as there is uncertainty about cost-
effectiveness of nurse-led clinics, and precisely which components enhance wellbeing, and promote
quality of life.
Implications for practice Comprehensive planning and preparation is necessary to enable CNSs to develop the skills and
competencies required to deliver safe and effective nurse-led cancer follow-up clinics.
Patients appear satisfied with this nurse-led follow-up service, particularly the continuity,
empowerment, and delivery of holistic care.
Nurse-led cancer follow-up can address unmet needs, and survivorship issues.
Nurse-led follow-up appears feasible, but further research should incorporate evaluation of
patient outcomes and wellbeing, and cost-effectiveness.
British Medical Association (2015) Quality First: Managing Workload to Deliver Safe Patient Care.
file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/
TempState/Downloads/Workload-Management-Document-130516.pdf (Last accessed: 15 November
2017.)
Caird J, Rees R, Kavanagh J et al (2010) The Socioeconomic Value of Nursing and Midwifery: A
Rapid Systematic Review of Reviews. EPPI Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of
Education, University of London.
Davies N, Batehup L (2011) Towards a personalized approach to aftercare: a review of follow-up in
the UK. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 5, 2, 142-151
Farrell C (2015) Advanced Nursing Practice and Nurse-Led Clinics in Oncology. Routledge, Oxon.
Faithfull S, Hunt G (2005) Exploring nursing values in the development of a nurse-led service.
Nursing Ethics. 12, 5, 440-452.
Jefford M, Rowland J, Grunfeld E et al (2013) Implementing improved post-treatment care for
cancer survivors in England, with reflections from Australia, Canada and the USA. British Journal of
Cancer. 108, 1, 14 -20.
Kent E, Arora N, Rowland J et al (2012) Health information needs and health-related quality of life
in a diverse population of long-term cancer survivors. Patient Education and Counselling. 89, 2, 345-
352.
Khan N, Mant D, Carpenter L et al (2011) Long-term health outcomes in a British cohort of breast,
colorectal and prostate cancer survivors: a database study. British Journal of Cancer. 105, 1, 29-37.
Lamont N, de Pury J, Fulop N et al (2016) New approaches to evaluating complex health and care
systems. British Medical Journal. 352.
Maddams J, Utley M, Møller H (2012) Projections of cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom,
2010-2040. British Journal of Cancer. 107, 7, 1195-1202.
National Cancer Survivorship Initiative (2013) Living With and Beyond Cancer: Taking Action to
Improve Outcome www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/
181054/9333-TSO-2900664-NCSI_Report_FINAL.pdf (Last accessed: 30 June 2017.)
Richardson A, Halliday D, Wilson-Barnett J (2002) Evaluating the Impact of Introducing Lung and
Colorectal Nurse Specialists into the South East London Cancer Network. King’s College University,
London.
Wells M, Semple C, Lane C (2015) A national survey of healthcare professionals’ views on models
of follow-up, holistic needs assessment and survivorship care for patients with head and neck
cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care. 24, 6, 873-883.