type and image gestalt theory german term, roughly translates as the whole is greater than the sum...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Type and Image
Gestalt theory
Gestalt theory
Gestalt theory
Gestalt theory
German term, roughly translates asThe whole is greater than the sum of
its parts
Gestalt theory
German term, roughly translates asThe whole is greater than the sum of
its parts
In this case, the “arranged” dots communicate a meaning beyond simply saying “dots”. They connote a further meaning
How this relates to design
• A communication designer’s “dots” are used to connote a meaning beyond the obvious
• Our “dots” arephotographyillustrationcopywritingtypelayoutcolouretc
How this relates to design
Denotative meaning vs connotative meaning
How this relates to design
Denotative meaning vs connotative meaning
Denotation: direct meaning of a word, sign (symbol) or image
How this relates to design
Denotative meaning vs connotative meaning
Denotation: direct meaning of a word, sign (symbol) or image
Connotation: a second level of meaning added to the first
How this relates to design
Communication designers manipulate this “play” between denotation and connotation to add meaning to a whole, to infuse the “dots” with power
How this relates to design
The first and most powerful way we do this is through type and image and the relationship between the two.
Let’s look at how.
Does this communicate a message?
Does this communicate a message?
Will people read it?
Does this communicate a message?
Will people read it?
Will they be motivated to read it if they don’t
have to?
Does this communicate a message?
Does this communicate a message?
Will people read it?
Will they be motivated to read it if they don’t
have to?
What real role does good typography have
in communicating message?
Does this communicate a message?
Will people read it?
Will they be motivated to read it if they don’t
have to?
What real role does good typography have
in communicating message?
What role does image have with the
message?
So...
if the goal is to communicate a message to people who require the information, then good typography can only make the message clearer, easier to read. There is no inherent need to “design” the type on the page. Readership will not be affected.
So...if the goal is to communicate a message to people who require the information, then good typography can only make the message clearer, easier to read. There is no inherent need to “design” the type on the page. Readership will not be affected.
Connotative meaning…image can connote the relative “seriousness” of the content
Zoo Newsletter
Does this communicate a message?
Zoo Newsletter
Does this communicate a message?
Are people any more like to read it?
Zoo Newsletter
Does this communicate a message?
Are people any more likely to read it?
Why?
Zoo Newsletter
Does this communicate a message?
Are people any more like to read it?
Why?
What real role does image have in communicating message?
Zoo Newsletter
Does this communicate a message?
Are people any more like to read it?
Why?
What real role does image have in communicating message?
gives an immediate sense of content
So...
if the goal is to communicate a message to people who are only passively interested in the message, then image can attract them to read, typography can maintain their interest by making it easy to read.
So...
if the goal is to communicate a message to people who are only passively interested in the message, then image can attract them to read, typography can maintain their interest by making it easy to read.
Connotative meaning…
the zoo is a fun place, come and see it
But what is our most difficult and yet our most common audience for virtually any design?
someone who doesn’t care about our message and really doesn’t want to read it.
someone who doesn’t care about our message and really doesn’t want to read it.
For them, our goal is to first command attention usually with a connotative message (ie the “hook”), and then keep it long enough to get them to read something, a denotative message (ie the “text”).
Getting attention is often the easiest, certainly the most fun as a designer/advertiser
The point
The point
On its own, - the photo simply denotes a scarred
man
The point
On its own, - the photo simply denotes a scarred
man- the type denotes something
obvious
The point
On its own, - the photo simply denotes a scarred
man- the type denotes something obviousTogether, the connotative meaning is
a powerful anti drinking and driving message
So How do we do this
Type alone
Effective use of design elements…and principles…
to get eye into page
Images alonecan be very powerful, dramatic
but open to interpretation (or misinterpretation)
on its own, the image is ambiguous, type adds meaning
but open to interpretation (or misinterpretation)
on its own, the image is ambiguous, type adds meaning
So type and image together are often more powerful than either alone
text can add detail where images catch interest
can add a punchline to a funny image
can add a punchline to a funny image
connotation:Volkswagen is as solid and dependable as a mule
But in order to work, the relationship between type and image in crucial. They need to belong together, to seem harmonious so message is consistent.
a few examples
how are type/image interconnected?
how does each enhance the message of the other?
What is the connotative meaning?
Final Result
when there are sufficient relationships between text/image, they can be seen as one complete “whole”
Final Result
when there are sufficient relationships between text/image, they can be seen as one complete “whole”
one element (type or image) can’t exist without the other--both rely interdependently on the other to communicate one complete message.
A good test, can I remove one or the other without affecting either the design or the meaning?
How do we integrate type?
Many theories/philosophies
Image and type can be connected through
• Separation• Fusion• Fragmentation• Inversion
From Fragmented relationshipsType, Image, Message: A Graphic Design Layout Workshop
By Nancy Skolos and Tom Wedell
Separation
SeparationLayering– Type
superimposed, but distinct from image
SeparationBorder or
Frame– Type
contained outside image
SeparationWindows
(Compartments)
– Image and type in separate areas
FusionText and image
more strongly connected
FusionOptical Effect– Connected
with perspective or other optical effect
FusionShared Surface
or Texture– Type and
image woven together into surface
FusionMotion or
Gesture– Both are
affected by an implied force (movement) or gesture
FragmentationType and
image disturb/disrupt each other
FragmentationIrregularities– Elements are
torn/divided
FragmentationDisplacement– Graphic
element and type seem frozen, almost as if one frame of animation
FragmentationInterruption– Type and
image intrude upon each other
FragmentationExaggeration– Actions
amplified through scale, colour, complexity
InversionType and
image exchange roles
InversionHyper-realism– Type
photographed or otherwise seamlessly part of image
InversionBuilding Blocks– Image
constructed with letters
InversionFrames– Letters
become frames for images
Summary
• Many techniques to relate type to image
• We’ve looked at a few. • Generally least useful is Separation,
ie putting type in border or frame• Others more difficult to work with
but much more creative results.
Sample
• Start with a photo (maybe)
Sample
• Add some type
Sample
• Different ideas
Sample
• Hate it? Start over with another idea for type
Sample
• The final combines elements from all three concepts
• (in reality there would be dozens of these trials)