transit coordinating committee · raquel chavarria, e-tran 1) tcc coordination (garner/all, 20...
TRANSCRIPT
TCC Agenda February 21, 2018
Transit Coordinating Committee February 21, 2018 – TCC 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. SACOG Rivers Rooms 1415 L Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA Members of the public wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at the beginning of the meeting. We ask that members of the public request to speak and keep their remarks brief. Testimony will be limited to a total of ten (10) minutes. Conference Call Option - Please contact Azadeh Doherty ([email protected]), Barbara VaughanBechtold ([email protected]), Caroline Payne ([email protected]), or the SACOG receptionist (916) 321-9000 for Conference Call information. Please do not put your phone on hold during the conference call; instead please hang up and call back when you’re free.
1) TCC Coordination (Garner/All, 20 minutes)
a. Public Comment on non-agenda topics b. Brief introductions and sharing of significant news about transit systems c. Joint Transit Operator Project or Training Opportunities d. General TCC Information
February 22nd Webinar Overview of the 2018 SACOG Regional Funding Program - Please note that the target audience for this webinar is potential project sponsors
DUE February 23rd – Caltrans Transportation Planning Grants http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tpp/grants.html March 1st 2018 Cleaner Air Cap & Trade Summit - Register by February 28th Much appreciation to our regional transit operator partners in assisting SACOG with FTA Triennial Audit Call for Projects – 2019 MTIP and MTP/SCS (Caceres & Holtzen)
2) Review and Approve December 13, 2017 TCC Minutes (All, 5 minutes)
3) Civic Lab Discussion (Corless/Porter /All, 30 minutes)
Civic Lab Government Relations and Public Affairs Committee Item 2-5-18
4) Regional Zero-Emission Bus Planning and Coordination 2030 (Nico Bouwkamp, Frontier Energy, SMAQMD Contractor/All, 30 minutes)
see presentation – ZEV (Bus) Readiness in the Sacramento Region 5) Targeted Green Infrastructure Program (Duarte, SMAQMD/All, 10 minutes)
Targeted Green Infrastructure Funding Awards – FY 2017-18 6) SACOG Allocation Methodology for PUC 99313/LCTOP Funding (Payne/All, 10 minutes)
LCTOP 99313 Allocation for FY 2017-18 7) Connect Card Update (Courtright, RT/All, 5 minutes)
8) Meetings/Events/Updates (All, 5 minutes)
a. Meetings or Events b. Updates on Other Items
9) Set Next Meeting Dates (All, 5 minutes) a. Potential Operator Only – TAM Subcommittee meeting on Wednesday, March 21, 2018 – at SACOG b. Next TCC meeting on Wednesday, April 18, 2018 – at SACOG c. Adjourn TCC
The SACOG meeting facility is accessible to the disabled. If requested, this agenda and documents in the agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Persons seeking an alternative format should contact SACOG for further information. In addition, a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in a public meeting should contact SACOG by phone at 916-321-9000, TDD at 916-321-9550, e-mail ([email protected]) or in person as soon as possible and preferably at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
TCC Minutes December 13, 2017
Transit Coordinating Committee December 13, 2017 – TCC 9:00 a.m. to 11:15 a.m. SACOG Rivers Rooms 1415 L Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA Members of the public wishing to address the committee on any item not on the agenda may do so at the beginning of the meeting. We ask that members of the public request to speak and keep their remarks brief. Testimony will be limited to a total of ten (10) minutes. Conference Call Option - Please contact Azadeh Doherty ([email protected]), Barbara VaughanBechtold ([email protected]), Caroline Payne ([email protected]), or the SACOG receptionist (916) 321-9000 for Conference Call information. Please do not put your phone on hold during the conference call; instead please hang up and call back when you’re free. Attendees: Lisa Cappellari, Paratransit, Inc. Brian James, El Dorado County Transit Jen Pollum, Shasta RTA Jose Luis Caceres, SACOG Sharon Sprowls, SACOG Teri Duarte, SMAQMD Tiffani Fink, Paratransit, Inc. John Clark, BCAG Mary Pooler, Citrus Heights Keith Martin, Yuba-Sutter Transit Mike Costa, e-tran Teri Sheets, Unitrans Jeff Flynn, Unitrans Lynne Goldsmith, public advocate Mike Dour, Roseville Transit Matt Mauk, Folsom Stage Line Will Garner, Placer County Transit, TCC Chair Mike Luken, Yolo County Transportation District Terry Bassett, Yolo County Transportation District James Boyle, Sacramento Regional Transit District Mike Rosson, BCAG Diego Ayala, SACOG Hilda Iorga, SACOG Caroline Payne, SACOG Nancy Iseri, ACC Rides Jeff Tardiguila, public advocate Raquel Chavarria, e-tran
1) TCC Coordination (Garner/All, 20 minutes)
a. Public Comment on non-agenda topics b. Brief introductions and sharing of significant news about transit systems RT – RT lowering student fares next 6 months to see if can bring back student ridership, TransLoc micro transit pilot
planned for Citrus Heights in the New Year (2018). SACOG – FTA is requiring an RFP for procurement of the Transit Asset Management Tool. The group can select a vendor
after the full process. Other places have sole sourced since FTA initially funded the Cambridge Systematics TransAm tool. Have until October 2018 to complete TAM planning.
PCT – PCT/TART will postpone winter service in Tahoe, and curtail service because of lack of operators and maintenance workers. Cutting back on expansion plans funded by hotel tax, though this is not as acute of an issue since not seasonal.
YCTD – Recreational marijuana legalization is having effect on operator/transit workers’ ability to pass physicals. YCTD – West Sacramento is planning on starting on demand service, A TCC subgroup may want to discuss the impacts to
other operator transfers of RT lowering student fares. a. Joint Transit Operator Project or Training Opportunities – SACOG – Hilda Iorga, SACOG staff, sent about an email to
everyone regarding White belt/Lean 6 sigma training in February. This training is California specific regarding streamlining our state/local process. Cal Human Resources will be running the training.
TCC Minutes December 13, 2017
b. General TCC Information DUE December 21st: SB 1 – STA State of Good Repair project listings to SACOG – Based on SACOG Board
meeting dates. Only need letter at this point but resolution will need to come from agencies at as soon as possible. YCTD – Releasing a 12 year service RFP.
Delivery Plan Project updates: DUE 5 PM, January 5, 2018 for projects using CMAQ or STIP funds – This only applies to a handful of operators in region. Tell SACOG your schedule if you will be turning in paperwork this year. Let SACOG know if you already submitted request for CMAQ transfer to FTA. YCTD – There may be a 13c implication for TDM Grant to West Sacramento for their on demand transit service, due to overlap with existing YCTD services and potential loss of existing YCTD operator jobs if on demand service causes YCTD to make service reductions.
Other – YCTD – Civic Lab Process 2nd meeting – 6 of 9 projects are transit projects. One of the things that TCC needs to watch out for that there was a general lack of coordination at the regional level. Civic Lab leaders at SACOG unaware of TCC. Have transit staff participate in future Civic Lab meetings. Disconnect at meeting. SACOG Civic Lab staff had no clue how many operators were in the room at the meeting.
YCTD – Have transit operators lean forward. PI – How will Civic Lab funding will work with Discretionary 5307 process? YCTD – Have discussion at TCC about micro transit, rural transit, ZEVs. Standing Civic Lab report item. Talk to Raef.
2) Review and Approve October 18, 2017 TCC Minutes (All, 5 minutes) – Approved as is unanimously.
3) Presentation on North State Express Bus Service (Redding to Sacramento) (Jennifer Pollom, Shasta RTA/All, 15 minutes) see attachments April 2016 TIRCP Application – http://srta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3444 Shasta RTA is in the midst of business plan and looking for TICRP funding and is working with SJJPA to solidify operations funding with – 5 ZEV buses for green line and an opportunity for rural service to buy buses. Want to co-locating charging stations and make them available to other operators with ZEVs. Worked a little with City of Sacramento about a driver and bus area under highway 50 and connections with Yolobus to the airport, and heavy rail with San Joaquins and Capitol Corridor. Shasta RTA would like to get examples of existing transfer agreements. Learn more about Connect Card and the possibility of becoming part of that system. YCTD – Have any ridership forecast been done or cost estimates? Can’t share that information yet. Other operators may be offering applications for competing service(s). Shasta RTA – Currently there is only minimal Greyhound service between Redding and Sacramento, with no midday service. Amtrak through way bus service requires a train ticket, which adds additional cost. Amtrak is considering curtailing northern Amtrak bus service in Chico. YCTD. – What would funding source be? Shasta RTA – SJJPA could fund I-5 service if Amtrak service was curtailed. Feasibility study was completed in 2016. Ridership survey of 750 people has been done. 5311(f) funds – fund existing services and is a Caltrans goal. Less 5311 funding if available.
PCT – Looking at serving commuter or general service. Shasta RTA – Not much connection to south urban areas. Large majority looking to go to Sacramento International Airport, 30% of survey respondents looking to come to Sacramento for business as needed. One of the goals of this service would be to decrease number of SOVs on I-5. Jeff T (public) – How accessible will service be? Will there be lavatories on-board and will they be accessible? Shasta RTA – Currently looking at accessibility including how to access the vehicle (either lift or ramp), having electrical outlets (charging electric wheelchairs), interior accessibility etc. Trip time to airport 2 hours 10 minutes, and 2 ½ hours for downtown Sacramento.
PCT – Over the road coach? Shasta RTA – Looking at over the road coaches that will have bike storage on outside of buses to avoid boxing. The TCC meeting was recommended as a place to come and discuss this proposed interregional transit service.
PCT – Bus congestion in downtown Sacramento currently and issue. Shasta RTA – Look at how buses will travel through the downtown Sacramento area.
4) BCAG Chico to Sacramento Commuter Bus Service (Michael Rosson, BCAG/All, 15 minutes) see attachments BCAG – John Clark, ED, Mike Rosson, Transit Manager – Looked at feasibility study of transit service from
Chico to Sacramento. Would have good ridership on service. Have 3,000 residents that work in the Sacramento area. Can view the study on the Planning tab on BCAG website http://www.bcag.org/documents/planning/Butte%20to%20Sac%20Study/Butte%20County%20Commuter%20Plan%20Web.pdf . Expect 40% farebox recovery. There would be 2 AM and 2 PM buses, Oroville, Marysville then on to Sacramento. Taking item to BCAG Board for approval to apply for TIRCP and LCTOP funding.
TCC Minutes December 13, 2017
$3.5 million for TIRCP and $1.9 million for LCTOP. Three hybrid MCI buses. Oroville rail depot would act as the interim park and ride and a hub for rail service.
BCAG – Morning buses would be staggered and align with Sacramento service to allow transfer over to other commuter routes, rail service, and airport service. Have met with Yuba-Sutter Transit, RT and SACOG. Would like to get support for grant submittal. MCIs are ADA accessible and are commuter coaches. 2 hour one-way ride and will have WiFi, lavatories, etc. Vehicles will be fueled with renewable diesel as the current fleet, and will use for hybrid diesel electric. Plan to have 70-80 one-way trips per day.
YCTD – LCTOP is for operations. Does Butte county area have enough LCTOP? BCAG - The LCTOP amount is for over a three year period. BCAG would contribute $300,000 in LTF and fare revenue. PCT – What is the target date to start service?
BCAG – Would like to start mid-2019. Mainly need to get buses ordered. Have been in discussion with MCI. Have a piggyback procurement available to join and would take 1 to 1.5 years to get vehicles. Yuba-Sutter Transit was involved with the LSC study. We want to coordinate with Yuba-Sutter Transit and RT to make sure we are interlining and not negatively affecting route structure.
BCAG – We will keep the group apprised of progress.
5) SB 1 Non-Transit Specific Funding Opportunities (Caceres/All, 20 minutes) a. see attachments – see presentation. SHOPP – 2/3 for highway maintenance. Local Streets and Roads Program, ATP,
Local Partnership Program, Congested Corridors, and Trade Corridors Program, Caltrans Planning Grants, STIP. Local Streets and Roads – Goes directly to cities and counties – CIP – move up transit projects, more money for transit related improvements. Goes directly to CTC to tell them what will be done with funds. YCTD – May be future discretionary process for SGR and will be up to SACOG. SACOG – Allowing SACOG to have control of SGR allocation. Future years may be a discretionary pot. No decision has been made. ATP – Doubled in size, can build safe routes to transit or at transit facilities. All competitive. Revising guidelines this year. YCTD – Could be used to expand bike share? SACOG – Will check into that and get back. Local Partnership Program – new Prop 1B self-help counties. Voter approved sales tax for transportation. Give money for projects or match. Any City or County with voter approved tax or fee for transportation. Unitrans – approved fee for Unitrans transit service. Contact CTC or Jose Luis. No definition of voter. Broke into two with formula and discretionary. 50% formula and 50% competitive. 2/3 threshold tax. Based on revenue and population north south split so one isn’t competing against the other. Roseville. – Fees for roadway improvements but not voter approved. Small set aside for additional funds for these type of entities. 10% of funds? Paratransit, Inc. – Do layered taxes get taken into account? SACOG – Yes more money taken in then more distributed. Have to demonstrate have tax/fee voter approved 2/3. 50% competitive – 90% of that can only be competed for by self-help entities – probably fair share distribution, prioritize projects and may have GHG improvements. 10% for everyone else that may have a fee that was not voter approved – looking at total revenue. Split it again – will compete only with like size cities/entities. Guidelines are posted. Eligible if owner of fee. STA is owner of Sacramento Measure A. Probably going to use current STA formula. SACOG not involved. Your tax collector and CTC are the only ones involved. Paratransit, Inc. – SB 1 language, cap and trade may reconsider maintenance of existing services. Chamber working on this can include as legislative policy changes. SACOG – Congested Corridors – definition of congestion is vague. Program “shall” be multimodal. Caltrans probably applicant and will be looking for transit partners since highway projects must be multimodal (transit, bike/ped, local feeder etc.). Hard to apply and deliver on same schedule. Not sure how much can we expect to get since we’re competing with Bay Area and southern CA. Caltrans planning grants. Stabilize the STIP. Jeff T. (public) – Rural representation on the CTC commission? SB 1 for trains only a portion of passenger rail. SACOG – Congested Corridors will likely have passenger rail.
6) Toll/Transportation Development Credits (Iorga/All, 15 minutes) – Not new money. See handout. SACOG will need to decide whether to allow Toll credits for match for discretionary 5307/5339 round.
7) Connect Card Update (Googins, LTK/All, 5 minutes) Mari and Gary – launched at RT in November 2016. Rest of operators now launched. Biggest transition is corporate accounts – large increase from that. RT is planning on stopping selling paper passes at end of 2017. Rest of transit agencies hopefully will follow (poss. 1st quarter 2018). By summer next year at the latest. Paratransit, Inc. – Will still have paper pass with RT sticker. Casey Courtright is the person at RT to follow up. It may be possible to create a Connect Card ID with decal integrated. Raley’s retail partnership is currently at a minimal number of stores that are Connect Card is partnered with and may have five more stores than those that exist. RT – Walgreens is a big partner with the Jacksonville and Bay Area universal fare car programs. Connect Card – Clipper Card issues in SF. Ticket vending machines will have CC functionality. Looking at libraries and other civic locations to partner with at retail location too.
TCC Minutes December 13, 2017
YCTD – Hanger card concept? Connect Car – Card based system and have to wait until evening uploads. Could have pre-valued cards, but retailers don’t want to deal with that. Exploring an account based system. Card info would live in the cloud. YCTD – Why can’t the system work like buying a movie card where value is there instantly? Connect Card – Buses can’t query back office since buses don’t have cellular connections. YCTD – RT voted to lower student RT passes. Connect Card – Cost to deliver low student fee will be absorbed by RT, so no change to transfer agreements. RT. – Will verify for group. Connect Card – Have been talking to North State Transit agency to join Connect Card and have system set up for others to join. Like Paratransit, and NNTMA. Bike share has also been talking about integration. Connect Card – CC fully deployed and operational. Staffing challenges in customer service area and in process of making sure call center is staffed as needed. YCTD – Mobile fare payment and customer service may affect rider buy-in. YCTD – Make mobile fare app MOU a front burner issue. Connect Card – We understand the value of corporate accounts. Connect Card can save even small businesses with corporate accounts. Save on FICA 15% with pre-tax payment. TPAs and vouchers are expensive and can be done away with. YCTD – Some users “hoard” vouchers and have too much to put on CC - $360 max.
8) Meetings/Events/Updates (All, 5 minutes)
a. Meetings or Events- Matt Pinkerton RT Acting Internal Accountability Auditor – FTA Triennial Request. b. Updates on Other Items
9) Set Next Meeting Dates (All, 5 minutes) a. Potential Operator Only – TAM Subcommittee meeting on Wednesday, January 17, 2018 – at SACOG – Tiffani willing to do RFP review. b. Next TCC meeting on Wednesday, February 21, 2018 – at SACOG c. Adjourn TCC
Post TCC TAM Update:
A. Transit Asset Management (Sprowls/All, 30 minutes) Update/Tool Funding Discussion
The SACOG meeting facility is accessible to the disabled. If requested, this agenda and documents in the agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Persons seeking an alternative format should contact SACOG for further information. In addition, a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in a public meeting should contact SACOG by phone at 916-321-9000, TDD at 916-321-9550, e-mail ([email protected]) or in person as soon as possible and preferably at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
Government Relations & Public Affairs Committee Meeting Date: 02/05/18
Agenda Item No.: 2018-February-10 Subject: Civic Lab Update Action Consent Information R&F Report Workshop Prepared by: Raef Porter Approved by: Erik Johnson Attachments: Y N
1. Issue: SACOG has conducted three Civic Lab workshops, and is finalizing the calendar for
the remaining sessions. 2. Recommendation: None. This item is for information only.
3. Background: SACOG selected and began working with the nine Civic Lab teams in
September. The attached document provides an overview of the teams and the mobility problems they have identified.
4. Discussion/Analysis: The full-day Civic Lab workshop sessions with all teams began in October, with additional workshops held in December and January. Workshops included:
October: Speakers from UC Davis Institute for Transportation Studies talking about autonomous, shared, and electric modes of transportation. The workshop also included a team-based work session on goal-setting.
December: A facilitated day of discussion and exercises focused on a deeper understanding of the problem, and creating a project charter to address that problem.
January: A panel on formulating a pilot, innovative methods for procurement, involving vendors in the scoping process, and joint development of projects. The second half of the day focused on moving from the team charter to an early call for proposals.
The next Civic Lab workshop is scheduled for February 14th. The workshop will include a session on how to evaluate a pilot project, and a half-day vendor showcase where teams will have the opportunity to talk with various vendors working on mobility solutions. This will be where teams begin to change the focus from a mobility challenge to solutions. Subsequent workshops will move more toward solutions, and begin to lay out the plan to launch a pilot.
5. Fiscal Impact/Grant Information: There is no fiscal impact at this time.
G o v e r n m e n t R e l a t i o n s & P u b l i c A f f a i r s C o m m i t t e e P a g e | 2
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment - Final Projects 2017
Lead Agency Identified Partners Issue
El Dorado CountyEl Dorado County Transit, Apple Hill Growers
How can you solve congestion at Apple Hill?
Yuba Sutter Transit LGC Civic Spark Is there a residential TDM solution for suburban and rural areas?
Sacramento AQMD, and SMUD
Historic Monterey Trail District How to provide ZEV solutions in disadvantaged communities
Citrus Heights, City of Folsom, City of Rancho Cordova, and Sacramento County
Sacramento RT, TMAs, Greater Folsom Partnership, Los Rios CCD
Are there new and better solutions to providing transit access in suburban areas?
Elk Grove Unified School District, Paratransit
North State BIA How can you move youth to jobs?
City of DavisUC Davis, Capitol Corridor JPA, Unitrans
Are these new mobility solutions that can reduce parking impacts at the Amtrak station?
Yolo County Transportation District
Yolo County, Knights Landing CSD, Dunnigan CSD
Are there new mobility solutions that can help provide better transit service in rural areas?
Final Projects
How do you move students from 65th LRT station to campus, is there an opportunity for an AV shuttle pilot project?
Sacramento State University
Yolo County Transportation District
How do you site mobility hubs that take advantage of disruptive technologies, and fit within the fabric of a city?
City of Woodland, Yolo County, UC Davis Planning
City of Sacramento, Sacramento RT
Attachment
Regional zero-emission bus
planning and coordination
by 2030ZEV Readiness for the Sacramento region
February 21, 2018
2
Objectives Develop a blueprint for stations and vehicles
Identify messaging, policies, incentives and procedures that will increase ZEV number (and regional barriers that will inhibit adoption)
Create a self-assessment tool for stakeholders
Identify municipal and business fleet opportunities for ZEV adoption
Timeline Between now and 2030 (~10 years ahead)
GoalCreate a new regional plan that targets adoption of ZEVs by high-mileage drivers throughout the Sacramento area.
3
High-mileage drivers Passenger car commuters
TNC riders, taxi users
Transit operators
MD/HD trucks
Stations / infrastructure Public DC fast chargers
Public H2 stations
ZEV fleet infrastructure
4
Innovative Clean Transit Rule By 2040, all California transit buses to be zero-emission buses○ Effectively (per 12 yr FTA life), after 1/1/2029, only ZEB acquisition
Rule targeted for adoption at June 2018 CARB Board meeting○ Currently staff regulatory proposal under review
Qualifying zero-emission bus technologies○ Battery electric
○ Fuel cell electric
○ Trolley electric
5
SACOG region transit agency Urban buses
Other vehicles
Grand total
Sacramento Regional Transit District1 203 7 210
Yolo County Transportation District1 55 7 62
e‐Tran2 50 10 60
Unitrans2 45 4 49
Roseville Transit2 36 14 50
Yuba‐Sutter Transit Authority 17 34 51
El Dorado Transit3 16 34 50
Placer County Transit5,6 23 32 55
Auburn Transit6 5
Paratransit Inc.6 0 181 181
City of Folsom 5 3 8
Regional totals
Transit agency w/ routes into SACOG
Urban buses
Other vehicles
Grand total
San Joaquin RTD1 76 37 113
Fairfield and Suisun Transit (FAST)4 48 12 60
Amador Regional Transit6 3 7 10
Tahoe‐Truckee Area Regional Transit 17 17
Others?
1 CARB Advanced Clean Transit Regulations Proposal 2015: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/bus/actdiscussiondocument.pdf2 Communication Unitrans 1/26, City of Roseville 2/7, and e‐Tran 2/133 Communication EDCAQMD: Demand response buses and vans – 22, Local Rural Fixed Route Buses – 12, Commuter Urban Bus Route Buses – 164 Table 4: FAST Vehicle Fleet (as of August 1, 2015): http://fasttransit.wpengine.com/wp‐content/uploads/2016/05/FAST‐SRTP‐2016‐06‐03‐Draft‐v3.1.pdf5 Communication PCAPCD 2/146 2015 CTA Transit Operating Statistics & APTA National Transit Database 2015
+
6
Total transit revenue vehicles in region
County Total vehicles* Total passengers*Sacramento 595 27,834,356Yolo 117 5,635,476Placer 111 1,286,821El Dorado 96 1,004,976Sutter/Yuba 51 1,296,622
Regional total 970 37,058,251
* 2015 Transit revenue vehicles per California county ‐ California Transit Association
7
Discussion about shared interests/topics Regional needs and strategy
Regional collaboration on ZEB technology and policy
Coordination on ZEB demo/pilot projects○ Joint projects
○ Pilot projects vs. full rollout project (reflecting current operations)
Maintenance staff training/education
Demand charges○ PG&E
○ SMUD
○ Roseville Electric
Summary of TGIF Awards Selected by Lottery FY 2017‐18
AWARDEES Rank Transit Agency Amount Requested Award 1 Folsom Stage Line $9,000 $9,000
Up to 12 stops Seating for two attached to sign poles
2 City of Elk Grove (E‐tran) $30,800 $30,800
11 stops with existing shelters Replacement solar lighting
3 Yuba‐Sutter Transit Authority $30,000 $30,000
Evelyn Drive at Martel Drive High‐capacity shelter and related amenities
4 Yolo County Transportation District $40,000 $10,200
Matmor at E. Main ‐ ADA shelter, solar lighting W. Main Street at Community Lane ‐ Bus shelter, solar lighting
_______ ______ TOTAL $109,800 $80,000
WAIT LIST 5 Sacramento Regional Transit – $40,000
7 high‐ridership stops Shelters, pads, trees as needed
POPULATIONAS A ALLOCATION 2/
JURISDICTION POPULATION 1/ % OF TOTAL
SACRAMENTO COUNTYUnincorporated 580,126 30.81% $720,081 3/
Citrus Heights 86,372 4.59% $107,209 4/
Elk Grove 168,118 8.93% $208,676Folsom 77,310 4.11% $95,961Regional 25,471 1.35% $31,616 5/
Regional 844 0.04% $1,046 5/
Rancho Cordova 72,267 3.84% $89,701 4/
Sacramento 486,111 25.81% $603,386 4/
SUTTER COUNTYUnincorporated 20,862 1.11% $25,895Live Oak 8,366 0.44% $10,384Yuba City 67,386 3.58% $83,643
YOLO COUNTYUnincorporated 29,244 1.55% $36,299Davis 67,731 3.60% $84,071West Sacramento 52,797 2.80% $65,534Winters 7,135 0.38% $8,856Woodland 58,615 3.11% $72,756
YUBA COUNTYUnincorporated 58,741 3.12% $72,912Marysville 12,061 0.64% $14,971Wheatland 3,526 0.19% $4,377
TOTAL 1,883,083 100.00% $2,337,374
1. Sources: Report E-5, Department of Finance, Demographic Research Unit, 1/1/2016
2. Entire amount must be used for transportation planning and mass transportation purposes.
3. Of this amount, 95.2% (the percent of Unincorporated Sacramento County's population which is within the Sacramento Regional
Transit District) or $685,517 is reserved in whole for SRTD. The balance of $34,564 is reserved
for an eligible regional project.
4. Entire amount is reserved for SRTD for a total of $800,296
5. Available for an eligible regional project.
Regional Share of Statewide PUC Allocation: 5% of annual proceeds
February 2018SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
ALLOCATION OF LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM (LCTOP)FY 2017-18
PUBLIC UTILITY CODE SECTION 99313
9931310:56 AM:2/8/2018 LCTOP Allocations FY17-18.xls