tracey griesbaum petition
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
1/26
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF IOWA FOR POLK COUNTY
TRACEY GRIESBAUM,
Plaintiff,
CL No.
vs.
THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA, BOARD OFREGENTS, and the STATE OF IOWA
Defendants.
PETITION AND JURY DEMAND
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Tracey Griesbaum, by and through her attorneys, and for her
cause of action hereby states the following:
INTRODUCTION
Disparity of Female Coaches in Education and Sports
1. More women than men attend and graduate from college today.
2. Women contribute over half of the tuition and provide their respective educational
institutions access to over half of the federal funds given to universities and colleges across the
United States.
3. Despite these contributions and a legal right to equality, women remain in second-
class status in college athletics, and they are losing ground.
4.
The primary source of continued inequality for women in college athletics is
gender bias and gender stereotypes. These biases are real, they are extensive and they are
powerful.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
2/26
5. Gender biases cause athletic departments to regularly apply double standards and
deny women full equality.
6.
Gender biases no longer have any place in our society and constitute illegal
behavior under our laws.
7. Gender bias adversely affects female coaches more strongly when they lead teams
and develop athletes in the same manner as male coaches do.
8. These biases or double standards arise from the expectations placed on women
coaches to be strong and competitive, but also mothering and nurturing towards female athletes.
Male coaches have no such expectations placed on them when coaching either gender.
9. Because of the bias, most female coaches know they are required to work very
hard to meet the double standards and adapt their coaching styles by:
a. Monitoring their language.
b. Worrying about how to make all the players happy.
c. Attempting to make the parents of the student athletes happy.
d. Monitoring how and when they challenge administration about department
policies, intercollegiate protocols, and program resources.
10.
When complaints are made against female coaches, they are considered guilty in
the eyes of administrations.
11. Where a male coach may be called tough and competitive, a female coach with
the same demeanor is called mean and abusive.
12. Even when proven innocent, usually after a protracted process, a female coach
will often have her contract terminated because gender bias created continuing doubts about her.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
3/26
13. This is what happened to Plaintiff Tracey Griesbaum.
PARTIES
14. Plaintiff Tracey Griesbaum is a resident and citizen of Iowa City, Johnson
County, Iowa.
15. Defendant The University of Iowa is located in Iowa City, Iowa, established and
maintained pursuant to Iowa Code Chapter 263.
16. The University of Iowa’s purpose of teaching, research and service is intended to
be provided to men and women on equal terms.
17. Defendant Board of Regents, the State of Iowa, resides and has its principal place
of business in Des Moines, Polk County, Iowa, established and maintained pursuant to Iowa
Code Chapter 262.
18. The Board of Regents’ purpose is to govern five public education institutions ,
including the University of Iowa and the University of Iowa Athletic Department, in the state
through policymaking, coordination, and oversight.
19. The State of Iowa resides and has its principal place of business in Des Moines,
Polk County, Iowa.
20. The acts of which Plaintiff complains occurred in Iowa City, Johnson County,
Iowa.
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
21. Prior to filing this action, Tracey Griesbaum filed charges of employment
discrimination on the basis of gender, sexual orientation, and retaliation against Defendants with
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
4/26
the Iowa Civil Rights Commission under the employment and education provisions of the Iowa
Civil Rights Act.
22.
All three of these complaints were screened in by the Iowa Civil Rights
Commission, which issued its findings on November 30, 2015.
23. Tracey Griesbaum has obtained a Right to Sue letter from the Iowa Civil Rights
Commission on December 23, 2015.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Legal and Historical Structure for These Claims
24. This is an action against the University of Iowa and the State of Iowa for
discrimination in employment and in education based on gender discrimination, sexual
orientation discrimination, and retaliation for participation in a protected activity in violation of
Plaintiff Tracey Griesbaum’s rights protected by state law.
25. This action is brought to redress Tracey Griesbaum’s rights under the Iowa Civil
Rights Act, Chapter 216 (hereinafter “ICRA”).
26. Under the ICRA women have a right to be treated equally in all aspects of
employment or education including being free from the negative effects of gender bias that
disfavor females and normally favor males in college athletics.
27. The ICRA also protects Iowans from sexual orientation discrimination.
28. The athletic system across the country at the collegiate level openly and internally
favors males in sports and devalues the rights of females to participate equally in athletics and
coaching.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
5/26
29. While women have advanced as leaders in society in general, a host of barriers
still limit progress, evidenced by the fact that women hold only about 15-20% of the leadership
positions in our country. This includes governors, legislators and Fortune 500 companies.
College athletics is a system that is even more male-centric than most organizations1, and it is
therefore at an even higher risk for gender bias when women try to step into roles long held by
males.
30. Women in college athletics live and work within a system that is rife with many
of the trappings of sexism. The current preferences and support for male sports such as football,
basketball, baseball and wrestling reflect old traditions and perceptions that women cannot
participate in sports in the same way as males. Changing this antiquated notion and creating
equal opportunity for men and women in education and athletics was part of the impetus for
Congress to pass Title IX.
31. This is not an action alleging claims under Title IX of the Education Amendments
of 1972. References to violations of Title IX or the decision to ignore rights under that statute
are included for context and to provide additional evidence of discrimination based on gender.
These facts are also evidence of gender bias and discrimination, which violates the Iowa Civil
Rights Act.
32. Title IX requires “continued progress” for women and was intended to ensure that
women would someday be permitted to participate in and enjoy the benefits of athletics in the
same way as males. No other federal law that provides for equality requires that the minority
group put up with being treated unequally for years until “society catches up.”
1 In the 2014-2015 academic year, only 33 of 353 Division I Athletic Directors were women. See NCAASport Sponsorship, Participation and Demographics Search engine (available athttp://web1.ncaa.org/rgdSearch/exec/instSearch.)
http://web1.ncaa.org/rgdSearch/exec/instSearchhttp://web1.ncaa.org/rgdSearch/exec/instSearchhttp://web1.ncaa.org/rgdSearch/exec/instSearch
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
6/26
33. Women have put up with this legally sanctioned second-class status for almost 50
years in federal law.
34.
Iowa law has no such “continuing progress” exceptions and requires equality.
The University of Iowa Athletics Department Under the Barta Administration
35. From 2006 to 2014, the Barta Administration has undermined, forced out or
terminated six highly-qualified female coaches and one administrator.
36. The decisions surrounding the departure of these six women were based on:
a. A lack of support or interest in women actually being competitive (Gayle Blevins,
Kelly Crawford, Tracey Griesbaum).
b. Female coaches requesting that Barta provide more equal facilities (Cindy
Fredrick, Mandi Kowal, Tracey Griesbaum, Sharon Dingman).
c. Overreaction to complaints of female student athletes toward their female coaches
(Blevins, Fredrick, Kowal, Dingman, and Griesbaum).
d. The responses to women who directly challenged the administration (Crawford,
Fredrick, Dingman, Griesbaum and Jane Meyer).
37. A male coach is permitted to yell, curse, threaten, throw things, be ejected from
games and push athletes to the edge of their ability even if it sometimes results in injury. This is
clear with the Iowa football, wrestling, and men’s basketball teams, which are coached by all-
male staffs.
38.
Male coaches for men’s and women’s teams are permitted to manage their staffs
and their roster to achieve successful results. Female coaches are deprived generally of such
latitude. For example:
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
7/26
a. If a male athlete leaves a program, it is rarely scrutinized.
b. If a female athlete leaves a program led by a female head coach, questions are
asked.
c. End-of-year reviews that contain student athlete complaints or criticisms are used
against female coaches.
d. Most, if not all, complaints or criticisms directed at male coaches are ignored.
The Merger of the Men’s and Women’s Athletic Departments
39. From 1973 until approximately August 2000, the University of Iowa had separate
men’s and women’s athletic departments.
40. Dr. Christine Grant served as the first women’s athletic director at the University
of Iowa after the passage of Title IX.
41. The University of Iowa Women’s Field Hockey field is named after her , in honor
of her contribution to Iowa athletics.2
42. Dr. Grant worked with the men’s athletic department to make continued progress
for women in athletics, while ensuring the University maintained a high level of competitiveness
for both male and female sports.
43.
Dr. Grant was able to add women’s athletic programs (rowing and soccer) and
supported the coaching methods of female coaches, such as Gayle Blevins, which permitted her
to reach Hall of Fame status in coaching.
2 See http://btn.com/2012/10/12/title-ix-retrospective-profiling-dr-christine-grant/; see also
http://now.uiowa.edu/2014/11/media-advisory-christine-grant-discuss-politics-sport-college-education-nov-11
http://btn.com/2012/10/12/title-ix-retrospective-profiling-dr-christine-grant/http://btn.com/2012/10/12/title-ix-retrospective-profiling-dr-christine-grant/http://btn.com/2012/10/12/title-ix-retrospective-profiling-dr-christine-grant/http://now.uiowa.edu/2014/11/media-advisory-christine-grant-discuss-politics-sport-college-education-nov-11http://now.uiowa.edu/2014/11/media-advisory-christine-grant-discuss-politics-sport-college-education-nov-11http://now.uiowa.edu/2014/11/media-advisory-christine-grant-discuss-politics-sport-college-education-nov-11http://now.uiowa.edu/2014/11/media-advisory-christine-grant-discuss-politics-sport-college-education-nov-11http://now.uiowa.edu/2014/11/media-advisory-christine-grant-discuss-politics-sport-college-education-nov-11http://btn.com/2012/10/12/title-ix-retrospective-profiling-dr-christine-grant/
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
8/26
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
9/26
52. From August 2000 until August 2006, the University of Iowa, under the direction
of Bob Bowlsby, generally met these conditions and was committed to achieving gender equity.
53.
In 2006, Gary Barta replaced Bob Bowlsby as the Director of Athletics.
54. Mr. Barta could have continued down a similar path as Bob Bowlsby and helped
women’s athletics progress.
55. Instead, Mr. Barta chose to prevent resources from being directed to women’s
sports so that the University could maintain and possibly increase its financial support to the
male sports of football, basketball and wrestling.
56.
Starting around 2008, the Barta administration began to direct more support and
resources to the tier one male sports.
57. Gary Barta chose to ignore the Merger Memorandum and hired a male to work in
the No. 2 position as Deputy Director.
58. Gary Barta chose to pay the male administrator over $70,000 more than the
female who previously had that position.
59. The decision by the Barta administration to stop the need for “continued progress”
as required by Title IX constitutes a gender-based violation of the Iowa Civil Rights Act.
Evidence of Removing Similar Female Coaches Because of Gender and/or Sexual
Orientation
60. From 2006 to 2014, the Barta administration pushed out or fired six highly
qualified female coaches and removed its strongest and most powerful female from
administration.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
10/26
61. After Barta took over as the director of athletics, the department began a pattern
of undermining, intimidating and terminating coaches as well as covering-up violations of the
law to keep resources from women’s programs.
62. In December 2007, the first of the six females, Cindy Fredrick, was pushed out of
University of Iowa athletics when the Barta administration terminated her as the women’s
volleyball coach.
63. The excuse used to remove Coach Fredrick was her record and player complaints.
64. Regarding her record it is important to note the following:
a.
Coach Fredrick inherited a poorly supported volleyball program when she arrived
at Iowa, as evidenced by the lack of a separate floor for volleyball.
b. Prior to coming to Iowa, Coach Fredrick had success in turning around women’s
volleyball programs.
c. Coach Fredrick was only given four seasons to turn around the volleyball
program; the University of Iowa’s position is that it generally takes approximately
seven years to turn around a program.
d. Coach Fredrick was not given the resources to turn her program around.4
4 Athletic Director Barta handed the women’s volleyball program to a male after firing two women whocoached without the benefit of a separate volleyball floor. There is other evidence of support for the malevolleyball coach including marketing efforts that show that administration did not really get behind the program until a male was put in charge, as well as the fact that the University paid the male coachsubstantially more than the two females. The same disparity occurred in the rowing program. RowingCoach Kowal was removed and replaced with a male coach. When her male replacement left voluntarily,he was replaced with another man.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
11/26
65. Coach Fredrick also challenged the administration regarding equal distribution of
resources for women’s sports and questioned the University’s practice of elevating the
importance of complaints from female student athletes.
66. In 2010, Larissa Libby, gymnastics coach, publicly challenged these same issues
(lack of support and problems with facilities).
67. After this challenge, the female gymnastics coach was brought in, chastised, and
told to “not do that again” or risk termination.5
68. During the 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 seasons, Hall of Fame softball coach Gayle
Blevins was not supported by the University of Iowa when a male assistant coach undermined
her authority with her players.6.
69. In addition, a female player’s parent made a public challenge to Coach Blevins.
70. Coach Blevins understood that the University would not support her in response
to this parent’s complaint.
71. As a result of the University of Iowa Administration’s actions and lack of support,
coach Blevins retired in June of 2010.7
72. On or about June 15, 2011, the University of Iowa terminated women’s golf
coach, Kelly Crawford.
5 See generally http://www.hawkeyesports.com/sports/w-gym/mtt/larissa_libby_233112.html. 6 Studies show that a male hired to be an assistant to a female coach or who is a peer of a female coach,may have doubts about the decisions of the female coach. These doubts are normally powered by gender
stereotypes. See Burton, Borland, Mazerolle – “They cannot seem to get past the gender issue”:Experiences of young female athletic trainers in NCAA Division I intercollegiate athletics, SportsManagement Review 15, p. 304-317 (2012) (“male coaches of male sports perpetuated a stereotype offemale incompetence in the male domain of sport by continually challenging the professional decisions ofour participants.”)7 In her 31 years as a head coach, Blevins compiled a record of 1,245 wins, 588 losses and 5 ties. At thetime of her retirement, Blevins was the second-winningest softball coach in NCAA DivisionI history. She never had a losing season.
http://www.hawkeyesports.com/sports/w-gym/mtt/larissa_libby_233112.htmlhttp://www.hawkeyesports.com/sports/w-gym/mtt/larissa_libby_233112.htmlhttp://www.hawkeyesports.com/sports/w-gym/mtt/larissa_libby_233112.htmlhttp://www.hawkeyesports.com/sports/w-gym/mtt/larissa_libby_233112.html
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
12/26
73. Initially, the alleged reasons for her termination were “poor reviews” by the
players.
74.
When Coach Crawford challenged this, the reason given to her to justify her
termination was changed to the commonly used excuse of her “record.” Records for male
coaches in baseball, track and tennis were not similarly scrutinized.
75. Coach Crawford’s termination was unlike the men’s programs that had poor
records (baseball, track and tennis), because those male coaches were normally not fired or if
terminated had been provided more time to turn programs around.
a.
As with Coach Fredrick, Coach Crawford had a strong history of coaching or
developing programs prior to coming to Iowa.8
b. As with Coach Fredrick, Coach Crawford was not given seven years to turn
around her program as she was fired after five years (2006-2011).9
c. While replaced by a female, Coach Crawford eventually learned that the real
reason she was being removed was to make way to replace her with a male coach,
Mark Hankins. Mr. Hankins was going to be offered the job to coach both men
and women’s golf.
d.
The plan to replace the female coach with a male was sidelined after the female
student athletes reported that they did not want to play for Mr. Hankins given his
treatment of the male players.
8 Coach Crawford was the first head golf coach at UC Irvine and led the program for six years. Duringthat short time she led that program to a No. 13 ranking in the country.9 Coach Crawford was also told by the Barta Administration, specifically by administrator Fred Mims,that “she was not going to be able to turn the program around.”
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
13/26
e. Unlike the investigations launched into the behavior of female coaches based on
athlete complaints, Athletic Director Barta did not investigate these complaints
about the male golf coach. Instead, he continued to support Mr. Hankins including
providing Mr. Hankins with a promotion to the postion of assistant to the athletic
director on August 5, 2014, the day after Coach Griesbaum was terminated.
f. Prior to this time, Mr. Hankins had been provided a number of other privileges
denied to female coaches including; a) not being investigated for player
complaints; b) being permitted to engage in fundraising for his program; c) being
permitted to purchase an expensive travel van denied to female programs; and d)
being allowed to challenge administration in a manner denied to female coaches.
76. In May 2012, the University of Iowa removed rowing coach Mandi Kowal.
77. During her career, Coach Kowal was expected to compete without access to key
facilities, such as a boathouse.
78. After working hard to obtain a boathouse, she was removed and replaced with a
male coach.
79. A female student athlete complained about training while injured. The complaint
was enabled by the gender stereotypes of administration and used against Coach Kowal.
80. After Coach Kowal was fired in part for the athlete complaint, the coaching
methods of the male rowing coach who replaced her were objectively more aggressive than
methods used by Coach Kowal.
81. In January 2014, the University of Iowa removed the women’s volleyball coach
Sharon Dingman.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
14/26
82. Coach Dingman was removed after advocating for resources and she was replaced
by a man who was given more pay and increased support.
83.
As with Coach Fredrick and Coach Crawford, Coach Dingman had success prior
to coming to the University of Iowa.
84. Coach Dingman was finally able to obtain a new floor for volleyball but was then
fired before she had any real chance to take advantage of it.
85. Since leaving the University of Iowa, Coach Dingman has been nominated for
coach of the year.
86.
In addition to paying the male coach of the volleyball team more than the female
coach, Defendants also pay the women’s basketball coach substantially less than the men’s
basketball coach for performing similar work.10
Tracey Griesbaum Was Improperly Fired
87. The next discriminatory removal of a female coach by the Barta Administration
occurred with the termination of the Plaintiff, Tracey Griesbaum on August 4, 2014.
88. Coach Griesbaum had been at Iowa for 22 years, 14 of which she served as head
coach.
89. Coach Griesbaum maintained a competitive program including leading the team
to three Big Ten Tournament Championships, one regular season Big Ten Championship, six
NCAA Tournament appearances, and the 2008 NCAA Final Four.
10 Defendants will likely try to use women’s basketball as an example to say that female programs are notreceiving less than male programs and also distinguish women’s basketball as a tier one sport. DespiteDefendants’ misplaced effort, there is no reason that the coach of the women’s basketball team should be
paid hundreds of thousands of dollars less than the coach of the men’s basketball team. The differences in pay for men’s and women’s basketball coaches after 2009 are a direct violation of Iowa’s equal pay
provision under the Iowa Civil Rights Act.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
15/26
90. Coach Griesbaum has been an example to all coaches, male and female, in the
area of proper and effective coaching methods.
91.
In the course of leading a successful, highly competitive field hockey program,
Coach Griesbaum received occasional complaints from players and their parents.
92. In May 2014, an investigation was launched against Coach Griesbaum based on
an anonymous complaint made by the parent of a student athlete.
93. More than 40 interviews were conducted and no policy violations were found,
still Barta terminated Coach Griesbaum on August 4, 2014.
94.
Coach Griesbaum was terminated because of double standards in coaching.
95. Coach Griesbaum’s coaching methods were not only proper, they were well
within the standards for Division I athletic programs, and commended by Athletic Director
Barta.
Tracey Griesbaum Was Targeted and Fired for Illegal Reasons
96. Consistent with this pattern of terminating female coaches who received player
complaints; on or about April 30, 2014, a female student athlete and/or her parents pressured the
University of Iowa to investigate the coaching methods of Tracey Griesbaum.
97. Coach Griesbaum was accused of conduct described as “ bullying,” “verbal
harassment,” and “intimidation.”11
98.
The University of Iowa’s reaction to the complaint reveals the gender-based
double standard in place when receiving female student athlete complaints compared with male
student athlete complaints.
11 See University of Iowa Athletics Department Memo from Gary Barta to Tracey Griesbaum dated July11, 2014.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
16/26
99. Coach Griesbaum is not known for yelling, screaming or intimidating players.
100. There is no evidence that Coach Griesbaum ever used foul or abusive language.
101.
The vast majority of Coach Griesbaum’s former players confirmed during the
investigation that she was fair and fostered a healthy environment for the student athletes both on
and off the field.
102. The investigation concluded that Coach Griesbaum did not violate any University
of Iowa policies.
103. Despite the investigation exonerating Coach Griesbaum, Gary Barta still used his
own biases and stereotypes about how women should coach compared to men and instructed
Coach Griesbaum to change her coaching methods.
104. Coach Griesbaum stood firm that she had done nothing wrong and that changing
her coaching methods would hurt the field hockey program.
105. Coach Griesbaum refused to succumb to gender stereotypes and being held to a
different standard than males.
106. Gary Barta would never have instructed a male coach to make changes after a
report exonerated them.
107. Coach Griesbaum was fired a few days later on August 4, 2014.
108. There is no male coach who has been fired because of a student athlete’s
complaint.
109. There are numerous videos of male coaches using foul language, screaming at
athletes, throwing objects and being ejected from games.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
17/26
110. On January 26, 2011, 13 male athletes were hospitalized after what was described
as a punitive workout.
111.
The male coaches responsible for the workout are still secure in their positions.
112. Despite the fact that a lawsuit was filed and settled against the University of Iowa
for a documented injury to a football player, Defendants have supported, provided raises, and
otherwise honored the strength and conditioning coach who was found to have overworked and
exposed the student athlete to substantial physical harm.
113. Under the current administration, the behavior of male coaches has not warranted
investigations let alone discipline or termination.
114. Overreacting to a female student athlete concern against a female coach while
ignoring the physical risks of harm to male players who similarly complain about male coaches
is gender discrimination.
115. Had Tracey Griesbaum been a male with the same coaching methods, skills and
winning record, she would not have been investigated or terminated.
The Barta Administration Discrimination Based on Refusal to Investigate
116. On multiple occasions, Coach Griesbaum requested that the Defendants simply
investigate the extent to which her gender or sexual orientation were a factor in the decisions that
led to her termination.
117. Despite the Defendants having policies that complaints of discrimination will be
investigated, not one person or department within the University investigated her concerns.
118. University of Iowa administration is aware or should be aware of the very high
risks of stereotype or gender bias that place female coaches and student athletes at risk:
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
18/26
a. The University should be aware that female players and parents of female players
will report behavior of female coaches differently (more frequently and for less
risk of physical harm) than male players or parents of male players will report on
the behavior of a male coach.12
b. University of Iowa administration is aware or should be aware that players of any
gender, and parents of any athlete, will hold women in leadership (coaching)
positions to higher standards than they place on men in leadership positions.
c. University of Iowa administration is aware or should be aware that male and
female players and parents of male and female players will hold female leaders
more responsible for the emotional reactions of young student athletes (such as
“she was mean to me,” “she is intimidating,” or “I feel bad about myself”) and yet
not hold male leaders responsible in the same way.
119. University of Iowa administration is aware or should be aware that male student
athletes are discouraged from reporting emotional upset resulting from the behavior of male
coaches and are discouraged from reporting risk of physical harm based on the behavior of male
coaches.
120.
Denial and refusal to investigate the risk of gender and/or sexual orientation bias
is itself evidence of such bias.
121. From September 2014 through December 2015, the Barta administration was
provided multiple opportunities to investigate whether gender bias had influenced the process
12 Morrongiello, B. A., & Zdzieborski, D., Normand, J., (2010) Understanding gender differences inchildren’s risk taking and injury: A comparison of mothers’ and fathers’ reactions to sons and daughters
misbehaving in ways that lead to injury, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31 322-329, p.328. (internal citations omitted).
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
19/26
that led to the removal of Tracey Griesbaum and whether sexual orientation had been a factor.
The requests for investigation and reconsideration came from multiple interests and stakeholders
including:
a. Coach Griesbaum, who on at least three occasions asked for investigation from
the Defendants.
b. Several student athletes who were members of the 2014 field hockey squad.
c. Alumni and parents of current and former student athletes.
d. Former coaches and athletic department staff.
e.
Former and current athletic professionals outside of the University of Iowa,
including but not limited to coaches, umpires, athletic trainers, and doctors.
122. The University of Iowa and Gary Barta failed to investigate any of these concerns
of any of these stakeholders.
Additional Evidence of Sexual Orientation Bias
123. Coach Griesbaum is a gay woman.
124. Coach Griesbaum’s personal relationship with her partner, Jane Meyer, was
disclosed to the University of Iowa to ensure they were in compliance with University policy.
125.
Jane Meyer was the SWA and the No. 2 person in the athletic department until her
forced removal and reassignment in December 2014.
126. Coach Griesbaum did not report to Jane Meyer and there was no oversight by
Jane Meyer of the field hockey program.
127. The University of Iowa cleared the relationship and indicated it was not in any
way in violation of University policies.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
20/26
128. The University of Iowa also determined that no management plan was needed
because there was no direct reporting structure.
129.
Other familial relationships exist between family members and spouses
throughout the university, including husband/wife teams, father/daughter teams, and sibling
teams.
130. Many of these other relationships require management plans by the University of
Iowa, but Coach Griesbaum’s relationship did not.
131. The two most recognizable familial employment relationships in Iowa athletics
are on the football team, where the head coach hired his son as an assistant coach, and the
wrestling team, where the head coach hired his twin brother as associate head coach.
132. Unlike Coach Griesbaum and her partner ’s familial/employment relationship, the
other familial/employment relationships were required to be cleared and subject to a
management plan that required a reporting line change.
133. Gary Barta did not care about the clearance and held her sexual orientation
against Tracey Griesbaum, just like he had held the sexual orientation against other female
coaches.
134.
Gary Barta has a history of terminating gay female coaches once their
relationships are made public, including after the public adoption of a baby with the wife of the
rowing coach and two months after a volleyball coach announced her marriage to her partner.
135.
Former President Sally Mason made statements to the Des Moines Register
Editorial Board that the University was unaware of Coach Griesbaum’s relationship.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
21/26
136. Former President Mason’s statements speaking on behalf of the University of
Iowa were false.
137.
Regardless of the falsity of the statement, the University of Iowa publicly
admitted that they were holding the relationship with Tracey Griesbaum against her partner, Jane
Meyer.
Post-Employment Retaliation
Punishment of Jane Meyer to Intimidate Tracey Griesbaum - Protected Activity
138. After Coach Griesbaum challenged the University’s termination and requested
investigation, she was subjected to retaliation with the punishment of her partner, Jane Meyer.
139. Jane Meyer was removed from the department of athletics on December 5, 2014.
140. Specifically, Jane Meyer was informed by Gary Barta that due to the threat of
Coach Griesbaum’s lawsuit, Jane Meyer would need to be removed from the department of
athletics.
141. The University of Iowa retaliated against Tracey Griesbaum for bringing concerns
of gender discrimination, sexual orientation discrimination and retaliation to its attention by
threatening her partner.
142.
The University of Iowa believes and tells its employees that it is permissible to
remove a long-term employee from her position if a family member, partner or spouse has
threatened legal action against the University.
143.
The University of Iowa’s decision to remove Jane Meyer from the University of
Iowa Athletics Department has derailed Jane Meyer’s career.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
22/26
144. Each day that Coach Griesbaum’s partner is kept out of the athletic department
hurts her career in athletics and therefore is intended to and causes harm to Tracey Griesbaum.
145.
The University of Iowa’s removal of Jane Meyer from the athletics department
will discourage anyone from making a complaint of discrimination or retaliation to the
University, particularly a spouse or family member also employed at the University of Iowa.
Retaliation in Future Employment
146. As a result of the Defendants’ actions in terminating Coach Griesbaum, she has
been unable to obtain employment in a coaching capacity.
147.
Coach Griesbaum has not even been able to obtain a volunteer coaching position
where she would have agreed to work for free, in an effort to get back into athletics.
148. Gary Barta has influenced future employers to not hire Coach Griesbaum to work
at other universities around the country.
149. Gary Barta’s actions on behalf of Defendant the University of Iowa has further
derailed Coach Griesbaum’s career.
CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I
VIOLATION OF THE IOWA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION IN EMPLOYMENT
150. Plaintiff Tracey Griesbaum re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 149 as if fully set
forth herein.
151.
Under the provisions of Iowa Code Chapter 216, it is unlawful for an employer to
discriminate against an employee on the basis of gender or to retaliate against her for engaging in
activity protected by Chapter 216.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
23/26
152. Defendant’s conduct was a motivating factor in that it has discriminated against
Tracey Griesbaum with respect to failing to treat her equally to male employees, allowing her to
be discriminated against by her supervisor, subjecting her to different and heightened scrutiny,
holding her to different and higher standards, and removing her from her position a few days
after refusing to abide by a request to lower her coaching standards so she could reduce
complaints by student athletes.
153. Defendants’ decisions to fire Tracey Griesbaum was discriminatory and resulted
in the loss of her career.
154.
After Tracey Griesbaum asked the University of Iowa to investigate her
termination, Defendants retaliated against her in an effort to dissuade her from dropping her civil
rights claims by removing her partner from her long-time position of over 14 years in the athletic
department.
155. As a proximate result of Defendant’s actions, as outlined above, Tracey
Griesbaum has in the past and will in the future suffer mental and emotional harm, anguish,
humiliation, embarrassment, loss of dignity, lost wages and benefits, and lost earning capacity.
COUNT II
VIOLATION OF THE IOWA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION IN
EMPLOYMENT
156. Tracey Griesbaum re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 155 as if fully set forth herein.
157.
Under the provisions of Iowa Code Chapter 216, it is unlawful for an employer to
discriminate against an employee on the basis of sexual orientation or to retaliate against her for
engaging in activity protected by Chapter 216.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
24/26
158. Defendant’s conduct was a motivating factor in that it has discriminated against
Tracey Griesbaum with respect to failing to treat her equally to heterosexual employees,
allowing her to be discriminated against, subjecting her to different and heightened scrutiny at
work, holding her to different and higher standards, and retaliating against her for engaging in
conduct protected by Chapter 216, in violation of Chapter 216.
159. After Tracey Griesbaum made her sexual orientation more public, she was
discriminated against in the terms and conditions of her employment.
160. After Tracey Griesbaum asked Defendants to investigate whether she was being
discriminated against, her partner was removed from her long-time position in retaliation.
161. As a proximate result of Defendant’s actions, as outlined above, Tracey
Griesbaum has in the past and will in the future suffer mental and emotional harm, anguish,
humiliation, embarrassment, loss of dignity, physical harm, lost wages and benefits, lost earning
capacity, and career derailment.
COUNT III
VIOLATION OF THE IOWA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT
GENDER AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION AND RETALIATION
ON THE BASIS OF EDUCATION
162.
Plaintiff repleads paragraphs 1 through 161 as if set forth herein.
163. The University of Iowa is an “educational institution” within the meaning of
section 216.9 of the Iowa Code.
164.
Tracey Griesbaum refused to provide her student athletes a lesser experience
because Gary Barta did not want her to coach her team in any manner other than one that would
not generate one concern by a student athlete.
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
25/26
165. This standard was never applied to any male coaches.
166. As a proximate result of the University of Iowa’s actions, Tracey Griesbaum has
in the past and will in the future suffer injuries and damages set forth above.
RELIEF REQUESTED FOR COUNTS I, II AND III:
WHEREFORE, for Counts I, II and III, Plaintiff Tracey Griesbaum respectfully requests
the Court grant the following relief:
A. Grant equitable relief in the form of orders requiring Defendant to do the
following:
i. Refrain from engaging in any employment practice whichdiscriminates on the basis of gender or sexual orientation and violates Chapter216; and
ii. Engage in a multi-sport investigation into the coaching practices andmethods used by male and female coaches. Create a standard and acceptedcoaching methods handbook that shall be applied to all coaches regardless ofgender or sexual orientation.
iii. Provide implicit bias training and monitoring to prevent theoperation of bias or stereotypes impacting female coaches in hiring, assessmentof coaching methods, pay, performance, investigations or termination.
iv. Provide training regarding how to effectively avoid engaging ineducational discriminatory practices and to report to the court once every sixmonths for a period of three years on the training provided and on itseffectiveness; and
v. Require that all disciplinary, demotion and hiring decisionsregarding its employees be reviewed by outside legal counsel for compliancewith Iowa laws and regulations prior to implementation; and
vi. Monitor the workplace environment to assure that employees are not being treated differently in the department of athletics and report annually to thecourt for a period of three years on its monitoring; and
-
8/20/2019 Tracey Griesbaum petition
26/26