toward the development of evidence-based anti-counterfeit ... · • abercrombie & fitch jeans...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Toward the Development of Evidence-Based Anti-Counterfeit Strategy for the
Bearings Industry
Jeremy M. Wilson
October 7, 2010
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• MSU as the intellectual hub of anti-counterfeit strategy
• The A-CAPPP’s evidence-based approach
• The value of analysis
• How the A-CAPPP is informing decision-making
• Examples of how the A-CAPPP can assist ABMA
• Potential opportunities for ABMA-A-CAPPP partnerships
Agenda
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• MSU as the intellectual hub of anti-counterfeit strategy
• The A-CAPPP’s evidence-based approach
• The value of analysis
• How the A-CAPPP is informing decision-making
• Examples of how the A-CAPPP can assist ABMA
• Potential opportunities for ABMA-A-CAPPP partnerships
Agenda
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
MSU: The Intellectual Hub of Anti-Counterfeiting Strategy
• Despite the staggering impact of counterfeiting, virtually no scientific leadership exists to guide the response
• Interdisciplinary expertise, a practical, collaborative approach, and a renowned international reputation led industry to seek out MSU to establish and lead the discipline
• University rallied to launch A-CAPPP
• Our goal is to become the trusted partner and resource for industry, government, and academic translational research and guidance
– We aim to inform decision-making at all levels
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
What Makes MSU Unique?• Independent and objective
• Analytical and evidence-based “Safe Space”
• Non-profit with mission to inform
• Breadth and depth of a world-renowned research university
Criminal Justice
Engineering
Consumer Behavior
Public Health
Law
Business
Packaging
SupplyChain
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Education
Outreach
Research
The A-CAPPP is Multi-Dimensional
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• MSU as the intellectual hub of anti-counterfeit strategy
• The A-CAPPP’s evidence-based approach
• The value of analysis
• How the A-CAPPP is informing decision-making
• Examples of how the A-CAPPP can assist ABMA
• Potential opportunities for ABMA-A-CAPPP partnerships
Agenda
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Established Tenets of Crime Prevention Theory Guide Our Thinking
• The first component is problem-solving
– Data should guide analysis of specific problems
– Responses are evidence-based and tailored to the problem
• “SARA” is key to problem-solving
– SARA is a systematic process for examining all relevant data related to a recurring problem
Scanning AssessmentResponseAnalysis
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Established Tenets of Crime Prevention Theory Guide Our Thinking
• The second component is the crime triangle
– The crime triangle identifies the basic elements that comprise any problem
• We must analyze and understand these elements in order to solve problems
Source: Center for Problem-Oriented Policing
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
SARA and the Triangle are Linked
Scanning AssessmentResponseAnalysis
We must obtain data and conduct analyses that relate to the crime triangle
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Increasing the effort the offender must make to carry out the crime
• Increasing the risks the offender must face in completing the crime
• Reducing the rewards or benefits the offender expects to obtain from the crime
• Removing excuses that offenders may use to “rationalize” or justify their actions
• Reducing or avoiding provocations that may tempt or incite offenders into criminal acts
Situational Crime Prevention Provides Techniques to Reduce Crime Opportunities
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Problem-Solving Has Proven Successful in Addressing Other Forms of Crime
• Youth homicides – The Boston Gun Project
– 63% reduction in homicides
– 32% reduction in shots-fired calls
– 25% reduction in gun assaults
– 44% reduction in youth gun assaults
• Burglaries at apartment complexes
• Thefts at construction sites
• Street prostitution
• Graffiti
• Vehicle burglary
• Overt drug markets
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
So What Does This Framework Tell Us?
• Problems must be specifically and accurately defined
• The process must be data-driven
• The solution must be focused
• Assessment must be ongoing
These principles can and should be applied to product counterfeiting
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• MSU as the intellectual hub of anti-counterfeit strategy
• The A-CAPPP’s evidence-based approach
• The value of analysis
• How the A-CAPPP is informing decision-making
• Examples of how the A-CAPPP can assist ABMA
• Potential opportunities for ABMA-A-CAPPP partnerships
Agenda
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Research and AnalysisImproves Understanding of a Problem and
Shapes Discourse
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Research and AnalysisHelps to Create Solutions to Problems
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Research and AnalysisDetermines If and How Strategies are Effective
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Research and AnalysisCreates and Facilitates Promising Practices
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Research and AnalysisInforms Resource Allocation
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• MSU as the intellectual hub of anti-counterfeit strategy
• The A-CAPPP’s evidence-based approach
• The value of analysis
• How the A-CAPPP is informing decision-making
• Examples of how the A-CAPPP can assist ABMA
• Potential opportunities for ABMA-A-CAPPP partnerships
Agenda
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Drawing on a Promising Approach—The Extremist Crime Database
• Open source domestic terrorism database
• Includes violent and financial crimes committed by members of far right, far left, and Al Qaeda (1990-2008)
• Includes incident, victim, suspect and group information—all collected from open sources
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
The Database Illustrates the Usefulness of Open-Source Data to Inform Decision-Making
• Developed/refined domestic terrorism training curriculum
• Consulted with law enforcement to better assess risk priorities
• Helped to develop proactive and reactive responses to extremist groups
• Indicated types of information that should be collected and shared
• Briefings and partnerships requested by US House of Representatives, DHS, CIA, FBI, Secret Service, and the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism
• Analyses have led to multiple grant awards, research publications, policy memoranda, and student dissertations
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
The A-CAPPP Product CounterfeitingIncident Database
• All US-related cases since 2000
• Drawing from open sources
• We have identified 800+ cases thus far—the search continues
• Cases involve various products from several industry sectors, but we have started with those pertaining to pharmaceuticals
This is the first empirical, open-source database constructed to develop evidence-based policy
lessons on product counterfeiting
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
The Database Aids Problem Solving
Example: A counterfeit pharmaceutical case
Iggy Prints
Albers Medical Distributors
H.D. Smith Wholesale Drugs
Jackson Memorial Hospital
Cardinal HealthFDA
Miami-Dade PD
Florida Department of Health
Broward County State Attorney
Florida Department of Law Enforcement
Florida’s Bureau of Statewide Pharmaceutical Services
New York Attorney General
19 individuals across several states
Hundreds of elderly patients and Medicaid users
Likely contributed to the deaths of some cancer and AIDS patients (Chief of FDLE)
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
The Database Aids Problem Solving
• We can identify the factors that contribute to the problem
• We can identify problem “controllers” (e.g., guardians)
• Knowledge of the process informs the intervention—prevention, detection, investigation, and response
• For longer-term research opportunities, the database also allows
– Systematic risk assessment (products, offenders, victims, contexts, etc.) to drive risk governance and communication
– Ongoing monitoring and evaluation
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
The Database Employs a SystematicThree-Step Process
• ONE: Identifying incidents
• TWO: Searching open-sources
• THREE: Coding open-source information
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Our Process is Working: Rx Incidents
Case identification
- Over 3,100 sources identified and scanned
Open source search
Coding
- Identified 568 incidents for all products
- Another 253 incidents to cross-check and add
- 75 Rx incidents from initial sample (568)
- 64 new Rx cases found in search files so far- 30 more search files to scan for new cases
- Cancer/AIDS Rx case: 354 pages
- Botox case: 72 pages
- Online Rx case: 122 pages
- Blood glucose strips case: 70 pages
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
We Have Information On Seizures by Quantity, Dollar Value, and Agency
• Ford auto parts
– $700K worth of brake pads, tail lights, ignition coils, water pumps, etc.; NYPD made arrests Dec. 2009; defendants charged with Trademark Counterfeiting and face up to 15 years
• Gucci shoes
– 15K pairs; retail value $3.8M; CBP in Norfolk, VA
• Women’s sunglasses
– Over 43K pairs; retail value $7.9M; CBP in Los Angeles, CA
• Luxury handbags, clothing, accessories
– Over 1,600 items; domestic value over $1M; ICE in Denver, CO
• Abercrombie & Fitch jeans
– Over 14K pairs; retail value $1.1M; CBP in Norfolk, VA
• NFL merchandise: About 2,500 jerseys/shirts; retail value over $300K; ICE, Phoenix PD and Glendale PD in Glendale, AZ
We can learn about the discovery and scope of product counterfeiting from seizure data
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Baby formula
– FDA investigated and assisted by The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
– Detailed information on arrest, conviction and sentencing for two offenders
• Soft drinks/water
– Trademark holder granted injunction and award of damages
• Misbranded mineral water
– Investigated by IRS and FDA
– Detailed information about indictment, search warrants, conviction and sentencing
• Adulterated seafood
– Investigated by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Law Enforcement; DHS; ICE; US Air Force; DOD
– Detailed information on indictment and trial date
• Adulterated caviar
– Investigated by US Fish and Wildlife Service, DHS and ICE
– Detailed information about sentencing and fines
We Also have Information On Investigationand Case Outcome
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
We have Information On Investigation and Case Outcome –An Example Timeline
• Adulterated deer meat investigated by Indiana Department of
Natural Resources and FDA
– Detailed information on conviction, sentencing and criminal
fines for two offenders
FEB 2004: Indiana Dept.
of Natural Resources contacts FDA for
investigative assistance
MAY 2005: Offender B sentenced 1 year
incarceration, 2 years supervised
release, over $500K in fines
JUL 2004: Offender A and B
indicted on 38 offenses each
DEC 2004: Offender A convicted after 8-day
trial
JAN 2005: Offender B
convicted after 8-day trial
APR 2005: Offender A
sentenced 1 year probation and $3K fine
We can learn how product counterfeiting cases are processed in the criminal justice system
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
We Have Identified Cases Linked to International Organized Crime
• Asian organized crime
– ICE’s “Operation Panda” in 2003
– Targeted 5 groups in NYC’s Chinatown areas
– Loosely partnered to support various illicit activities
– In 2004, 51 people charged with racketeering, attempted murder, alien smuggling, money laundering and illegal gambling
• Also charged with trafficking in counterfeit goods
• $4 million in counterfeited luxury goods seized
• In a potentially related case, the leader of New York’s “Lim Organization” was sentenced to 151 months for attempted murder and illegal gambling
– Court records also cited his group’s involvement in trafficking in counterfeit goods from 2002 to 2004
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
We Have Identified Cases Linkedto Terrorist Groups
• In 2006, 19 individuals in Detroit charged with operating a racketeering enterprise
– Counterfeit Viagra
– Counterfeit “Zig-Zag” cigarette papers
• Estimated value of $16 million
– Counterfeit cigarette tax stamps
• Court records indicate profits went to Hezbollah
• Several involved have been convicted or pled guilty
– Ordered to pay restitution to trademark holders
– Will be removed from US after serving prison sentences
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Our Data Articulate the Nature of Product Counterfeiting Risk and Formal Responses
• The scope of the problem within and across industries
• The basic elements and processes of the problem—the “chemistry of the crime”
• How the criminal justice system processes the problem
– The agencies that discover it
– The agencies that investigate it
– Case outcomes
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• In the infancy stage, our data collection already provides rich information
• The open-source approach holds promise for informing policy, practice, and decision-making by providing evidence that aids problem-solving
• By articulating process, participants, and other features we can identify points of intervention
• Proven tenets of crime prevention theory can guide the substance and goals of interventions
What Does This Tell Us So Far?
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
We’re Also Developing, Testing, and Evaluating Innovations and Programs (1)
• Biosensors that rapidly detect non-specific chemical and biological contaminants
– Is food good or bad?
• Covert DNA markings, taggants (multicolored nanoparticles added to a product), and tracers (inert chemical compounds) recognized only by manufacturers
• Sensor systems that engage in dynamic behavior only when directly stimulated by a user
These technologies increase offenders’ risk of apprehension and decrease harm to victims
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
We’re Also Developing, Testing, and Evaluating Innovations and Programs (2)
• Development of industry and company risk assessment tools
– Planning and reviewing scenarios
– Prioritizing corporate-wide risks
– Assessing product-specific counterfeiting risk
– Communication of risk and countermeasures
– Implications for “target hardening”
• Review of the Nigerian 2010 Anti-Counterfeiting and Substandard Program
– Lessons for enhancing specific forms of guardians
Other innovations will be developed and tested as we “learn” about product counterfeiting
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Other Projects Aim at Addressing the Crime Triangle (1)
• Multi-client studies/mini-conference
– Originally conceived as a quick analysis of an industry-defined problem to help shape immediate decisions
– Used to fill the “donut hole of research”
– Clients engage experts and learn from analysis prior to publication
– Recent topic was the “Role of consumers in product authentication”
• Increase crime effort by enabling potential victims
– Planning: Economically-motivated adulteration
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Other Projects Aim at Addressing the Crime Triangle (2)
• Estimating the return on investment for pharmaceutical counterfeiting
– Examining the ease and attractiveness of offending
• Counterfeiting and terrorist financing
– Identify attributes of offenders and their handlers
• Counterfeiting case studies (with the FBI)
– Understand characteristics and roles of offenders, places, guardians, and controllers
• Federal enforcement of product counterfeiting violations
– Increase apprehension risk and crime effort by improving guardianship
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
Other Projects Focus on Landscaping and Forecasting
• Economic impact of counterfeiting
• Product counterfeiting in Australia
• Product counterfeit sales, interventions, and displacement on the internet
• Review of the current state of counterfeiting and moving forward
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Packaging: innovations to increase risk
• Engineering: data mining and modeling to connect crime triangle elements
• Law: governance of intellectual property rights to enhance controllers
• Supply-chain: tightening distribution to increase risk and effort
• Communications: vigilance-increasing strategies to increase risk and effort; message tailoring
• Public health: create risk models and response strategies to increase effort and reduce harm
We’re Looking to Develop New Areas
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• MSU as the intellectual hub of anti-counterfeit strategy
• The A-CAPPP’s evidence-based approach
• The value of analysis
• How the A-CAPPP is informing decision-making
• Examples of how the A-CAPPP can assist ABMA
• Potential opportunities for ABMA-A-CAPPP partnerships
Agenda
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Articulate the risk and place it in context—internally and externally
– Extent and form of threat
– Existence of vulnerabilities
– Assessment of consequences
Research and Analysis Can Help ABMA and Its Members—Collectively and Individually
Threat
Vulnerability Consequences
Risk
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Articulate the risk and place it in context—internally and externally
• Development of evidence-based anti-counterfeit strategy to mitigate risk
– Formulate strategies
– Assess factors that facilitate and impede strategies
– Evaluate cost and effectiveness of strategies
Research and Analysis Can Help ABMA and Its Members—Collectively and Individually
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Articulate the risk and place it in context—internally and externally
• Development of evidence-based anti-counterfeit strategy to mitigate risk
• Inform resource allocation
• Identify promising practices and emerging trends
Research and Analysis Can Help ABMA and Its Members—Collectively and Individually
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Provide safe space for information sharing and learning
• Leverage partnerships with other industries, government agencies, and associations
• Train and educate staff to improve decision-making
Education Can Help ABMA and Its Members—Collectively and Individually
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• MSU as the intellectual hub of anti-counterfeit strategy
• The A-CAPPP’s evidence-based approach
• The value of analysis
• How the A-CAPPP is informing decision-making
• Examples of how the A-CAPPP can assist ABMA
• Potential opportunities for ABMA-A-CAPPP partnerships
Agenda
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Use publicly available information to chart the landscape of counterfeit risk to the bearings industry
• Raise awareness and shape discourse
• Serve as a reference source
• Products: briefings, webinar, A-CAPPP Paper, and trade article
A “Quick-Look” Industry Risk Assessment
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Individually and collectively examine the extent to which and how bearings manufacturers are
– Exposed to risk
– Assess risk
– Respond to risk
• Develop promising practices to mitigate risks based on organizational case studies
– Collection and analysis of primary and secondary data
• Manufacturers remain anonymous
• Products: briefings, A-CAPPP Paper, and journal article
An In-depth Organizational Risk Assessment
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Construction of open- or closed-source counterfeit bearings database for use by ABMA and the A-CAPPP
• Development of empirical lessons on
– The chemistry of the crime
– The nature of the risk
– Intervention strategies for prevention, detection, investigation, and response
– Ongoing trends within and among industries
• Products: ongoing briefings, webinars, A-CAPPP Papers, and trade and journal articles
Long-Term, Data-Driven Anti-Counterfeit Capacity Building
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees1010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees
• Increase awareness of product counterfeiting and mitigation strategies through training and peer-to-peer discussion
• Choice of location
– On-campus
– On-site
– Prior or subsequent to a conference/meeting
• Choice of participants
– By company
– By industry
– By position
Executive Education “On Demand”
© 2010 Michigan State University Board of Trustees