tim-wylie

Upload: msiantex

Post on 03-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    1/33

    COMPLIANT VS SAFE:

    COMMON PRACTICE

    AGAINST AS/NZS4871:2012

    23rdELECTRICAL

    ENGINEERING SAFETY

    SEMINAR

    WEDNESDAY 6thNOVEMBER

    2013

    TIM WYLIE

    CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER

    AMPCONTROL

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    2/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    1. What is compliant? What is safe?Understanding differences between voltage vs time exposure limits in 4871,

    2067 & 3007.

    2. Common practice (compliant?) examples against 4871We will explore a number of common scenarios for protection gradings and

    settings against the latest revision of AS4871, and investigate simple

    modifications that counter the traditional guidance and rules of thumb that can

    be shown to markedly improve safety.

    3. More than just an earth fault limitation?Damping the forgotten function of the NER.

    4. Summary observations

    PRESENTATION

    OVERVIEW

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    3/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    Is there a distinction between what is compliant and whatis safe?

    Traditional earth fault limits in presently in common use

    are compliant eg: 5A fault limit for 1000V systems inhazardous areas

    Earth loop impedance limits set out in AS2081 arecompliant

    Touch potentials resulting from compliant fault limits andloop impedances are not necessarily safe under the newrevision of 4871

    OVERVIEWCOMPLIANT IS NOT NECESSARILY SAFE ?

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    4/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    Any given parameter is considered to be compliant if

    it is nominated as such in a Regulation, in an MDG or

    in an applicable Australian Standard. The earth fault current limits set out in previous

    revisions of AS/NZS2081 are generally considered

    compliant.

    The limits for earth loop impedance and relay trippingtimes in AS/NZS2081 are compliant.

    WHAT IS

    COMPLIANT ?

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    5/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    AS/NZS4871.1:2012 relates the maximum duration ofhuman exposure to prospective touch voltages that do not

    usually result in harmful physiological effects on any

    person subjected to that touch voltage (i.e. safe).

    WHAT IS SAFE ?

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    6/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    A RECENT ADDITION TO

    AS4871MAXIMUM DURATION OF 50Hz TOUCH VOLTAGE

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    7/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    AS/NZS2067:2008 Clause 1.1 indicates

    This Standard does not apply to the design and erection of any

    of the following:

    (C) Mine site electrical installations, or parts of such installations

    Defines two curves (special and normal locations).

    The special location applies where there is negligible additional

    body resistance (bare hands/feet, minimal additional series

    impedance.

    The normal curve applies in dry situations where footwear

    and additional series impedance (PPE, gloves etc) are

    expected.

    WHAT ABOUT AS2067 ?SUBSTATIONS AND HV INSTALLATIONS EXCEDING

    1kV AC

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    8/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    AS/NZS3007:2004 provides two curves sets

    installations up to 1000V;

    installations exceeding 1000V.

    Both curve sets exceed the AS4871:2012 Lp curve

    and in some instances the dry area L curve.

    Using AS/NZS60479:2010, it can be demonstrated that

    higher touch voltage exposures allowable underAS3007 were not intended for application in

    underground wet area environments.

    AS/NZS3007 CURVE

    SETS ?

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    9/33

    COMPARISON OF

    TOUCH POTENTIAL

    LIMITS

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    10/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    Each curve results from differing assumptions in clothing,

    footwear, PPE and environment and so body current.

    Which one is right ?Depends on the application

    The definition of safe could be inferred from the

    amalgam of applicable standards as the lowest voltage

    versus time duration of all curve sets. The Lp curve ofAS4871:2012 closely approximates the minimum but

    may not be achievable or necessary in all applications

    WHY ARE THEY DIFFERENT ?WHICH ONE IS RIGHT ?

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    11/33

    BASIC TOUCH

    POTENTIAL ANALYSIS

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    12/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    TOUCH POTENTIAL

    ANALYSISCONVENTIONAL TOUCH POTENTIAL ANALYSIS

    For a 1000V system, phase to earth voltage is 577V, for 5A limitation

    NER is ~115 Ohms

    At 45 Ohm earth continuity limit, touch potential is:

    577 x 45 / (45 + 115) = 162V (how hazardous is this?)

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    13/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    DURATION OF 50Hz TOUCH

    VOLTAGEAS/NZS4871

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    14/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    At 162V, total protection clearance time (relay setting plus

    contactor actuation time) must be ~100msec.

    If the operating time of our protection exceeds 100msec we

    must increase the NER impedance or reduce the return earthcontinuity limit accordingly.

    The presence of an NER does not make the system safe.

    Safety is reliant on active earth leakage protection.

    If our active protection fails to operate we must restrict the continuoustouch potential to less than 25V to remain safe.

    Active protection must properly resolve leakage current both in

    terms of magnitude and frequency.

    TOUCH POTENTIAL

    ANALYSISCLEARANCE TIMES AT 50Hz

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    15/33

    EXAMPLE 1:

    DUAL 45 OHM CASE

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    16/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    DUAL 45 OHM CASETYPICAL DEVELOPMENT

    ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

    5A earth fault limit at substation, EC relays in sub andDCB both allow up to 45 Ohms pilot earth impedance

    Total return impedance for a fault at the load may be

    as much as 75 Ohms

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    17/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    DUAL 45 OHM CASETYPICAL DEVELOPMENT

    ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 5 Amp earth fault current limit, 35+40 = 75 Ohms earth

    return impedance

    Prospective touch voltage is 75/(115+75)*577 = 228V

    Clearance time:

    earth leakage relay 50 msec

    interposing relay delay 20 msec

    circuit breaker delay 130 msec the total clearance time is around 200 msec.

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    18/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    DURATION OF 50Hz TOUCH

    VOLTAGEAS/NZS4871

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    19/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    DUAL 45 OHM CASESUMMARY OBSERVATIONS

    On one hand: scenario is arguably compliant with olderstandards revisions since the key operating

    parameters are consistent with:

    5A Earth fault limit45 Ohm earth return impedance limit

    Typical of previously accepted practice

    On the other hand: Prospective touch voltage

    clearance times are to the right of the safe area underthe Lp curve in AS/NZS4871

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    20/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    200msec clearance time for the Lp curve requires

    110V touch potential limit

    Can adjust the NER, E/C limit or both With 75 Ohms return earth impedance, the NER

    value can be back calculated to limit the maximum

    earth fault current to around 1.8A

    With a tripping ratio of 10:1, experience indicates a180mA trip current may be impractical in many

    applications we will come back to this.

    DUAL 45 OHM

    CASEAN ALTERNATE SOLUTION

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    21/33

    EXAMPLE 2:COMMON GRADING

    SETTINGS

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    22/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    TYPICAL GRADINGTYPICAL DEVELOPMENT

    ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

    Resultant touch voltage is 134V

    Clearance time 400msec (E/L relay 250msec,

    interposing relay 20msec, CB delay 130msec)

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    23/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    DURATION OF 50Hz TOUCH

    VOLTAGEAS/NZS4871

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    24/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    COMMON GRADING

    SETTINGSAN ALTERNATE SOLUTION At 400msec clearance time, touch voltage reqd ~57V

    Back calculate current limitation for 35 Ohm return

    impedance as 1.8A (same as previous example)

    What about 10:1 tripping ratio?Under 4871:2012 test current for E/L relay is 120% or 1.2:1

    Typical tripping ratios in UK are 3:1, US are 2.5:1

    Tripping ratio should be maintained high as possible,

    but at 350mA trip (5:1) system would be safe

    Increased trip current avoids sympathetic trips on

    unfaulted outlets and relays still proven/tested to trip

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    25/33

    DAMPING FORGOTTEN

    FUNCTION OF THE

    NER

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    26/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    LESS CURRENT IS BETTER

    ?WHY NOT REDUCE THE EARTH FAULT CURRENTLIMITATION FUTHER ?

    In previous examples, the situation with regard to risk

    from touch potential and delivered energy is

    demonstrably improved as the fault current limit is

    reduced

    Touch potential hazard and the delivered fault energy

    can both be reduced to zero if the NER impedance is

    made infinite What is the upper limit for NER impedance ?

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    27/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    NER AND COMMON MODE

    DAMPINGINDUCTIVE FAULTS IN MOTOR OR TRANSFORMERWINDINGS

    Capacitance to earth dominated by cabling Large fault inductances can be created in winding faults (several

    Henry), common mode resonant frequency may approach 50Hz or a

    harmonic frequency of 50Hz

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    28/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    In a practical 11kV system with an inductive fault:

    Earth fault limit 50mA, up to 40 times nominal insulation

    stress

    Earth fault limit 5A, 3 times nominal insulation stress

    Earth fault limit 10A, 1.2 times (so acceptable)

    In any practical system, the NER impedance can be nolarger than would afford sufficient damping to prevent

    excessive insulation stress in case of an inductive fault.

    NER AND COMMON MODE

    DAMPINGA PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    29/33

    SUMMARYOBSERVATIONS

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    30/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    Recent changes to AS/NZS4871 are more significantthan generally appreciated

    Previously compliant elements are not necessarily

    compliant when configured in a practical system Removal of prescriptive limits on key parameters (earth

    fault limit, trip settings and clearance times) requires all

    design settings to be examined from first principles

    We must be able to justify all protection parameters(regardless of if they fall below the Lp curve or not) as

    being as low as reasonably practical

    SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    31/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    Complete an audit against AS/NZS4871

    Carefully consider the fundamental system parameters:

    earth fault limitation

    return earth impedance limit

    tripping ratio and total clearance times

    There is an increasing need to review underground

    substations:Compliance against AS/NZS4871

    Safety Bulletin SB11-04 (variable speed drives & fitment of

    wideband earth leakage, NER dissipation ratings etc)

    SUMMARY OBSERVATIONSA PROACTIVE APPROACH

  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    32/33

    Copyright Ampcontrol 2013

    Contacts

    ResTech: Steve Clifton [email protected]

    Ampcontrol: Tim [email protected]

    ResTech Two Day Short Course

    Principles and pitfalls associated with electrical protection in

    earth fault limited systems

    Day 1: Theoretical background and framework

    Day 2: Investigation & real world case studies

    Register your interest online at:

    restech.net.au/earthfaultseminar

    FURTHER ASSISTANCE &

    INFORMATIONCONTACT RESTECH OR AMPCONTROL

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie

    33/33

    QUESTIONS?