tim-wylie
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
1/33
COMPLIANT VS SAFE:
COMMON PRACTICE
AGAINST AS/NZS4871:2012
23rdELECTRICAL
ENGINEERING SAFETY
SEMINAR
WEDNESDAY 6thNOVEMBER
2013
TIM WYLIE
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
AMPCONTROL
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
2/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
1. What is compliant? What is safe?Understanding differences between voltage vs time exposure limits in 4871,
2067 & 3007.
2. Common practice (compliant?) examples against 4871We will explore a number of common scenarios for protection gradings and
settings against the latest revision of AS4871, and investigate simple
modifications that counter the traditional guidance and rules of thumb that can
be shown to markedly improve safety.
3. More than just an earth fault limitation?Damping the forgotten function of the NER.
4. Summary observations
PRESENTATION
OVERVIEW
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
3/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
Is there a distinction between what is compliant and whatis safe?
Traditional earth fault limits in presently in common use
are compliant eg: 5A fault limit for 1000V systems inhazardous areas
Earth loop impedance limits set out in AS2081 arecompliant
Touch potentials resulting from compliant fault limits andloop impedances are not necessarily safe under the newrevision of 4871
OVERVIEWCOMPLIANT IS NOT NECESSARILY SAFE ?
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
4/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
Any given parameter is considered to be compliant if
it is nominated as such in a Regulation, in an MDG or
in an applicable Australian Standard. The earth fault current limits set out in previous
revisions of AS/NZS2081 are generally considered
compliant.
The limits for earth loop impedance and relay trippingtimes in AS/NZS2081 are compliant.
WHAT IS
COMPLIANT ?
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
5/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
AS/NZS4871.1:2012 relates the maximum duration ofhuman exposure to prospective touch voltages that do not
usually result in harmful physiological effects on any
person subjected to that touch voltage (i.e. safe).
WHAT IS SAFE ?
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
6/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
A RECENT ADDITION TO
AS4871MAXIMUM DURATION OF 50Hz TOUCH VOLTAGE
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
7/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
AS/NZS2067:2008 Clause 1.1 indicates
This Standard does not apply to the design and erection of any
of the following:
(C) Mine site electrical installations, or parts of such installations
Defines two curves (special and normal locations).
The special location applies where there is negligible additional
body resistance (bare hands/feet, minimal additional series
impedance.
The normal curve applies in dry situations where footwear
and additional series impedance (PPE, gloves etc) are
expected.
WHAT ABOUT AS2067 ?SUBSTATIONS AND HV INSTALLATIONS EXCEDING
1kV AC
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
8/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
AS/NZS3007:2004 provides two curves sets
installations up to 1000V;
installations exceeding 1000V.
Both curve sets exceed the AS4871:2012 Lp curve
and in some instances the dry area L curve.
Using AS/NZS60479:2010, it can be demonstrated that
higher touch voltage exposures allowable underAS3007 were not intended for application in
underground wet area environments.
AS/NZS3007 CURVE
SETS ?
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
9/33
COMPARISON OF
TOUCH POTENTIAL
LIMITS
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
10/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
Each curve results from differing assumptions in clothing,
footwear, PPE and environment and so body current.
Which one is right ?Depends on the application
The definition of safe could be inferred from the
amalgam of applicable standards as the lowest voltage
versus time duration of all curve sets. The Lp curve ofAS4871:2012 closely approximates the minimum but
may not be achievable or necessary in all applications
WHY ARE THEY DIFFERENT ?WHICH ONE IS RIGHT ?
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
11/33
BASIC TOUCH
POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
12/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
TOUCH POTENTIAL
ANALYSISCONVENTIONAL TOUCH POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
For a 1000V system, phase to earth voltage is 577V, for 5A limitation
NER is ~115 Ohms
At 45 Ohm earth continuity limit, touch potential is:
577 x 45 / (45 + 115) = 162V (how hazardous is this?)
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
13/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
DURATION OF 50Hz TOUCH
VOLTAGEAS/NZS4871
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
14/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
At 162V, total protection clearance time (relay setting plus
contactor actuation time) must be ~100msec.
If the operating time of our protection exceeds 100msec we
must increase the NER impedance or reduce the return earthcontinuity limit accordingly.
The presence of an NER does not make the system safe.
Safety is reliant on active earth leakage protection.
If our active protection fails to operate we must restrict the continuoustouch potential to less than 25V to remain safe.
Active protection must properly resolve leakage current both in
terms of magnitude and frequency.
TOUCH POTENTIAL
ANALYSISCLEARANCE TIMES AT 50Hz
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
15/33
EXAMPLE 1:
DUAL 45 OHM CASE
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
16/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
DUAL 45 OHM CASETYPICAL DEVELOPMENT
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
5A earth fault limit at substation, EC relays in sub andDCB both allow up to 45 Ohms pilot earth impedance
Total return impedance for a fault at the load may be
as much as 75 Ohms
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
17/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
DUAL 45 OHM CASETYPICAL DEVELOPMENT
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM 5 Amp earth fault current limit, 35+40 = 75 Ohms earth
return impedance
Prospective touch voltage is 75/(115+75)*577 = 228V
Clearance time:
earth leakage relay 50 msec
interposing relay delay 20 msec
circuit breaker delay 130 msec the total clearance time is around 200 msec.
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
18/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
DURATION OF 50Hz TOUCH
VOLTAGEAS/NZS4871
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
19/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
DUAL 45 OHM CASESUMMARY OBSERVATIONS
On one hand: scenario is arguably compliant with olderstandards revisions since the key operating
parameters are consistent with:
5A Earth fault limit45 Ohm earth return impedance limit
Typical of previously accepted practice
On the other hand: Prospective touch voltage
clearance times are to the right of the safe area underthe Lp curve in AS/NZS4871
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
20/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
200msec clearance time for the Lp curve requires
110V touch potential limit
Can adjust the NER, E/C limit or both With 75 Ohms return earth impedance, the NER
value can be back calculated to limit the maximum
earth fault current to around 1.8A
With a tripping ratio of 10:1, experience indicates a180mA trip current may be impractical in many
applications we will come back to this.
DUAL 45 OHM
CASEAN ALTERNATE SOLUTION
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
21/33
EXAMPLE 2:COMMON GRADING
SETTINGS
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
22/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
TYPICAL GRADINGTYPICAL DEVELOPMENT
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
Resultant touch voltage is 134V
Clearance time 400msec (E/L relay 250msec,
interposing relay 20msec, CB delay 130msec)
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
23/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
DURATION OF 50Hz TOUCH
VOLTAGEAS/NZS4871
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
24/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
COMMON GRADING
SETTINGSAN ALTERNATE SOLUTION At 400msec clearance time, touch voltage reqd ~57V
Back calculate current limitation for 35 Ohm return
impedance as 1.8A (same as previous example)
What about 10:1 tripping ratio?Under 4871:2012 test current for E/L relay is 120% or 1.2:1
Typical tripping ratios in UK are 3:1, US are 2.5:1
Tripping ratio should be maintained high as possible,
but at 350mA trip (5:1) system would be safe
Increased trip current avoids sympathetic trips on
unfaulted outlets and relays still proven/tested to trip
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
25/33
DAMPING FORGOTTEN
FUNCTION OF THE
NER
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
26/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
LESS CURRENT IS BETTER
?WHY NOT REDUCE THE EARTH FAULT CURRENTLIMITATION FUTHER ?
In previous examples, the situation with regard to risk
from touch potential and delivered energy is
demonstrably improved as the fault current limit is
reduced
Touch potential hazard and the delivered fault energy
can both be reduced to zero if the NER impedance is
made infinite What is the upper limit for NER impedance ?
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
27/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
NER AND COMMON MODE
DAMPINGINDUCTIVE FAULTS IN MOTOR OR TRANSFORMERWINDINGS
Capacitance to earth dominated by cabling Large fault inductances can be created in winding faults (several
Henry), common mode resonant frequency may approach 50Hz or a
harmonic frequency of 50Hz
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
28/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
In a practical 11kV system with an inductive fault:
Earth fault limit 50mA, up to 40 times nominal insulation
stress
Earth fault limit 5A, 3 times nominal insulation stress
Earth fault limit 10A, 1.2 times (so acceptable)
In any practical system, the NER impedance can be nolarger than would afford sufficient damping to prevent
excessive insulation stress in case of an inductive fault.
NER AND COMMON MODE
DAMPINGA PRACTICAL EXAMPLE
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
29/33
SUMMARYOBSERVATIONS
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
30/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
Recent changes to AS/NZS4871 are more significantthan generally appreciated
Previously compliant elements are not necessarily
compliant when configured in a practical system Removal of prescriptive limits on key parameters (earth
fault limit, trip settings and clearance times) requires all
design settings to be examined from first principles
We must be able to justify all protection parameters(regardless of if they fall below the Lp curve or not) as
being as low as reasonably practical
SUMMARY OBSERVATIONS
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
31/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
Complete an audit against AS/NZS4871
Carefully consider the fundamental system parameters:
earth fault limitation
return earth impedance limit
tripping ratio and total clearance times
There is an increasing need to review underground
substations:Compliance against AS/NZS4871
Safety Bulletin SB11-04 (variable speed drives & fitment of
wideband earth leakage, NER dissipation ratings etc)
SUMMARY OBSERVATIONSA PROACTIVE APPROACH
-
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
32/33
Copyright Ampcontrol 2013
Contacts
ResTech: Steve Clifton [email protected]
Ampcontrol: Tim [email protected]
ResTech Two Day Short Course
Principles and pitfalls associated with electrical protection in
earth fault limited systems
Day 1: Theoretical background and framework
Day 2: Investigation & real world case studies
Register your interest online at:
restech.net.au/earthfaultseminar
FURTHER ASSISTANCE &
INFORMATIONCONTACT RESTECH OR AMPCONTROL
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/12/2019 Tim-Wylie
33/33
QUESTIONS?