ti-2515/191 inspection prepatation webinar

Regulatory Consulting Experts

TI-2515/191 Inspection Preparation Webinar

What to expect when the NRC inspects your site

Presented by: Jim Breunig PE

XCEED Engineering and Consulting P.C. 585-340-7277

[email protected]

Topics

• About XCEED

• Industry FLEX Inspection Status

• NRC Findings/Observations

• Regional Trends

• Best Practices

• Compliance Matrix Process

• Open Discussion


[email protected]

Who We Are

• We are a Professional Engineering Firm Specializing in Mechanical and Civil Design Engineering, and Regulatory Consulting

• New York State Licensed Professional Engineering Firm

• Experienced Fukushima Project Engineers


[email protected]

Recent Projects

• Tornado Wind Driven Missile Barriers

• RCP Seal Leakoff Piping Evaluation

• Modification Constructability Reviews

• 95001/95002 Inspection Preparation/Execution

• Design Verification Services


[email protected]

What to ExpectWhen the NRC comes to your site


[email protected]

Expectations

• NRC Staff Goal: Inspect Sites within 12 months of Compliance Date

• 4-6 inspectors

• 100 manhours per site reviewing your strategy

• Tabletop Review

• Field Walkdown• Most Issues found in field

• Normal Exit on Thursday


[email protected]

Industry StatusWhere are we now?


[email protected]

Where Are We Now?

• Over 25% Inspections Complete

• 17 sites complete as of tomorrow

• 50% of SEs are issued

• No significant issues identified

• Bulk of Inspections – 2017

• Remaining Inspections in 2018


[email protected]

Inspection Status


[email protected]

Courtesy of NEI FLEX V Conference – Industry Panel Inspection Lessons Learned

Upcoming Inspections (Tent.)

2017

• Prairie Island• Indian Point• Nine Mile Point• Three Mile Is.• Oyster Creek• Byron• Duane Arnold• South Texas• Hope Creek• Catawba• Beaver Valley• Dresden• Waterford


[email protected]

2018

• Fitzpatrick• Peach Bottom• Brunswick• Hatch• Farley• Oconee• Braidwood• Monticello• LaSalle• Quad Cities• Wolf Creek• Cooper• Columbia

2019

• Limerick• Susquehanna• Browns Ferry

Findings and Observations


[email protected]

NRC Findings

•Clinton (Report ML16266A301)• Green – Licensee didn’t ensure through evaluations,

calculations or analyses that the strategy would be capable of mitigating the event

• Hose Bend Radius

• Hose Coupling stress – 28 ft. drop


[email protected]

NRC Findings

•Perry (Report ML16258A452)• Green – Perry did not have a program in place for

periodic replacement of hoses with a defined shelf life.

• Green – Perry did not have PMs in place to check operation of communications equipment


[email protected]

Other Issues

•Lack of PMs• High/Low Pressure FLEX Pump PMs• Communications Equipment Checks• Hose Replacement Program

• In-Field Issues• Hose Bend Radius• Adapter clearances for SG makeup• ELAP Response trips Phase 1 pumps


[email protected]

Observations

• FSG Quality• Typos• Inconsistent label references• Links to deleted steps in other procedures

• 50.54(x) references• A licensee may take reasonable action that departs from a license condition or a

technical specification (contained in a license issued under this part) in an emergency when this action is immediately needed to protect the public health and safety and no action consistent with license conditions and technical specifications that can provide adequate or equivalent protection is immediately apparent.

• Ensure Phase Rotation Checks• FLEX Storage Temperature checks• Operational vs Design Margin• Missing Tools, Mislabeled Components


[email protected]

Regional Trends


[email protected]

Inspection Data Available


[email protected]

Region Number of Sites with Data

I 3

II 4

III 3

IV 1

ClintonDC CookGinnaHarris

HB RobinsonMcGuireMillstoneNorth Anna

PerryPilgrimPalo Verde

The data on the following pages is based on the sites identified below.

Most Common Things Inspectors Look At


[email protected]

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Region I Region II Region III Region IV

Nu

mb

er

of

Do

cum

en

ts R

evie

we

d

DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Procedures Reviewed Issues Reviewed Misc Training Work Orders Drawings Calcs Mods

*Raw WO and Issues Data is at the end of the presentation

Findings and Issue Trends


[email protected]

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Region I Region II Region III Region IV

Issu

es

and

Fin

din

gs

Do

cum

en

ts R

evie

we

d

F INDINGS AND ISSUES

Docs Reviewed Issues Findings

Issues Summary


[email protected]

PM Issues13%

Documentation61%

Field Misc.16%

Labeling Error10%

ISSUES SUMMARYPM Issues Documentation Field Misc. Labeling Error

Best Practices


[email protected]

Best Practices

•Present strategies on Day 1• Timelines help• Use visuals – maps/drawings/schematics

•Simulator can be used, but not necessary

•Computer Demonstration of multi-source dose assessment

•Provide FSGs and procedures to the team (current revision!)


[email protected]

Best Practices Cont.

•Keep support team in close proximity to the NRC

• Resolve issues quickly

•Provide computers to the support team to allow them to continue working

• Reduces stress

•Use knowledge base appropriately• NRC will ask many people same question to gauge

alignment and understanding• Use FLEX knowledge base


[email protected]

Best Practices Cont.

• Operations Ownership• Operators should lead the strategy presentation

• Shows understanding and ownership

• All operators should be knowledgeable of strategies


[email protected]

Compliance MatrixA method for Self Assessment


[email protected]

Self Assessments

• Using TI-2515/191 for self assessment• Break TI into requirements (~74 requirements)

• Document compliance for each one

• Pros:• Manageable list of requirements

• Cons:• TI accounts for only 8.7% of requirements


[email protected]

Self Assessments

• Using NEI 12-06 for Self Assessments• Break into requirements (~499 Requirements)

• Document compliance for each one

• Pros:• More detail for FLEX

• Cons:• Missing Dose Assessment, SFP, Communications


[email protected]

Self Assessments

• Guidance and other Regulatory Documents• EA 12-049 – FLEX Order

• EA 12-051 – SFP Level

• TI-2515/191 – Inspection Manual

• NEI 12-06 - FLEX

• NEI 12-01 – Communications

• NEI 12-02 – SFP Level

• JLD-ISG-2012-01 - FLEX

• JLD-ISG-2012-03 – SFP Level


[email protected]

Self Assessments

• 862 Requirements• EA 12-049 – 19

• EA 12-051 – 37

• TI-2515/191 – 74

• NEI 12-06 - 499

• NEI 12-01 – 96

• NEI 12-02 – 111

• JLD-ISG-2012-01 - 20

• JLD-ISG-2012-03 – 6


[email protected]

A Thorough Self Assessment

• How do you know if you’re in compliance with all of these requirements?


[email protected]

Solution

• Step 1: COLLECT & ANALYZE• Requirement Basis Documents (Orders, Guidance, FAQs, IERs, etc.)

• Step 2: EXTRACT• Extract requirements, maintaining source references

• Step 3: ORGANIZE• Organize Requirements into categories

• Step 4: REVIEW• Site Basis Documents (calculations, procedures, NRC submittals, program

plans, UFSAR, etc.)

• Step 5: DOCUMENT• Compliance for each requirement• Maintain Source References

• Step 6: GENERATE• Database and Report


[email protected] 31

Step 1: Collect and Analyze

• The scope of the compliance matrix is determined by the site• NRC order

• EA-12-049

• EA-12-051

• NEI 12-06

• NEI 12-01

• NEI 12-02

• 50.54(f)

• INPO IER

• etc.


[email protected]

Step 2: Requirement Extraction

• Requirements are extracted from guidance documents while maintaining source references.

• Maintaining source references allows the end user to reference back to the main document for each compliance requirement.


[email protected]

Step 2: Requirement Extraction


[email protected]

Requirement

Requirement ID

Step 3: Requirement Categorization

• Categorization allows for simplified searching and reports

• Requirements are categorized based on compliance attributes.

• Some requirements require multiple attributes. For example, NEI 12-06 section 1.3 states:

“To the extent practical, generic thermal hydraulic analyses will be developed to support plant specific decision-making.”

• This requirement involves Thermal Hydraulic analyses for the following critical functions:

• Spent Fuel Pool

• Reactor Coolant System

• Containment

• This requirement is therefore categorized as a Critical Function


[email protected]

Step 3: Requirement Categorization

• The FLEX requirement categories are broken down as follows:

• Boundary Conditions

• Deployment

• Critical Functions

• FLEX Support Guidelines (FSGs)

• Hazards

• Phases

• Protection

• Maintenance

• National Safer Response Center (NSRC)

• Submittal

36

Step 4: Site Documentation Review

• Documents reviewed include, but are not limited to the following:

• UFSAR

• Hydraulic Calculations

• Electrical Calculations

• Structural Calculations

• FSGs

• Site Emergency Procedures (EOPs, AOIs, EOIs, etc.)

• SAFER Playbooks

• Equipment Specifications

• Regulatory Submittals (OIPs, Order responses, etc.)


[email protected] 37

Step 5: Compliance Determination

• Each requirement category has unique attributes for which compliance must be documented

• Hazards• Seismic

• Flood

• Wind

• Temperature

• Phases• Phase 1

• Phase 2

• Phase 3

• Etc.

• Compliance is documented for each attribute of every requirement


[email protected]

Step 6: Compliance Documentation

• Compliance is documented within a Microsoft Access Database

• Compliance is searchable, and easily updatable.• Database provides a user-friendly tool for continued upkeep of

program documentation

• Cross linking allows in-depth compliance documentation• The following items are linked to each requirement as applicable:

• FLEX Equipment• References• Assumptions• NRC Open Items for each site• Accepted Alternative Strategies

• Database is accompanied by a final report detailing alternate strategies, findings, and regulatory vulnerabilities


[email protected]

Benefits During Inspection

•Increased NRC response time

•Searchable – documented bases

•Get’s team up to speed

•Everyone can be the expert


[email protected]

Open Discussion

•We Covered• About XCEED• Industry FLEX Inspection Status• NRC Findings/Observations• Regional Trends• Best Practices• Compliance Matrix Process• Open Discussion


[email protected]

Raw WO Data(note not all WOs are reported here)

• WO 200539430; PY-P67 Storm Drain and Sewer; 08/13/14

• WO 200579446; FLEX Electrical Modification and Testing; 04/22/15

• WO 200657240; FLEX Generator 1 PM; 06/15/16

• WO 200674418; FLEX Elect Water Transfer Pump PM; 07/21/16

• WO 01904390; Spent Fuel Pool Level Calibration (1LTFC221A); 06/22/2016

• WO 01904392; Spent Fuel Pool Level Calibration (1LTFC221B); 06/22/2016

• WO 01886012; FLEX D/G 1FX01KA Extent of Condition Opex; 2/2/16

• WO 01684636; 2SX02AB, Work Order to Perform Pipe Inspection; 12/10/13

• 55465872–01; MTRI, 1–RLI–502–CRI, Replace Unit; 06/09/15

• 1–0410–15; SFPI Installation Checklist; 08/26/14

• 55462958–01; Large FLEX Diesel Driven Booster Pump Functional Test; 09/25/15

• 55455157–01; Booster Pump Capability Test; Model WO

• 55431240–04; 2–EL–01 FLEX Generator Phase Checks; 03/17/15

• 55431244–20; 2–EL–03 FLEX Generator Phase Checks; 02/16/15

• 55432175–14; Perform Phase Rotation Accumulator Tank #4 Outlet Valve; 04/08/15




• 55432305–04; Perform (Bump) Rotation for Both BA Pump/Motors; 09/19/14

• 55437624–05; Perform Phase Rotation Check of 1–11D2; 09/28/14

• 55437627–44; Perform Run In on 5 Flex Diesel Generators and Document Phase

• 55437627–58; Perform Load Testing on 5 Flex Diesel Generators and Document

• 55437627–69; 480/600VAC Step up XFMR Testing; 10/12/14

• 55437696–17; Perform Phase Rotation Test at 1–EZC–A–5C; 10/14/14

• 55437696–18; Perform Phase Rotation Test at 1–EZC–B–1C; 10/14/14

• 55437696–19; Perform Phase Rotation Test at 1–EZC–C–5C; 10/14/14

• 55437696–20; Perform Phase Rotation Test at 1–EZC–D–1C; 10/14/14

• 55263614–04; Install Winterization: (Non-Power Block)

• WO 20076846-01, FLEX SFP Level Indication System Calibration, Completed December 8,

• WO 20076846-02, Replace Backup Batteries in FLEX SFP Level Control Panel, Completed

• WO 13306664, FLEX RCS Injection Pump Evaluation

• WO 13502944, Functional Test of Portable FLEX Equipment, Revision 1

• WO 20089566, Quarterly Functional Tests of FLEX Equipment, Completed December 1, 2016

• WO 20066530, Quarterly Functional Tests of FLEX Equipment, Completed September 7, 2016

• WO 20083777, Annual Operational Tests of FLEX Equipment, Completed June 1, 2016

• WO 20118050, FLEX RCS and AFW Equipment Semi-Annual Standby Walkdown, Completed

• Work Order 2009877-21, Quarterly Permanent FLEX Storage Building, Dated 3/31/2016


[email protected]

Issues Summary (note not all issues are reported here)

• - 2016-09739; 2016 NRC FLEX Inspection: High Temperature Hose Routing from ADHR;

• - 2016-09746; 2016 NRC FLEX Inspection: PM Development for FLEX Communications

• - 2016-09747; 2016 NRC FLEX Inspection: Periodic Testing of FLEX Satellite Phones; 8/10/16

• - 2016-09750; 2016 NRC FLEX Inspection: Tool Storage Issues; 8/10/16

• - 2016-09776; 2016 NRC FLEX Inspection: FLEX High Temperature Hose Replacement

• - 2016-09788; 2016 NRC Flex Inspection: Enhancement Opportunity for 744 Series Drawings;

• - 2016-09817; 2016 NRC FLEX Inspection: Improvement to PDB-R0003 Guidance; 08/12/16

• CR 1028391, BDB Unavailability Tracking Guidance Requires Revision

• CR 1028407, NRC TI-191 Inspection Identified a Potential Issue with Timeliness of Off-Site

• CR 1028362, No Documented Evaluation of the SWPH Temperature was Performed with 1-FPP-2 running Under ELAP

• AR 02684223; FLEX Inventory Discrepancy; 6/21/16

• AR 02684308; FLEX Enhancement Tracking; 6/22/16

• AR 02684975; FLEX Equipment PM Identified Minor Issues that were not Corrected;

• AR 02683833; Licensee Needs to Procure Additional Debris Removal Tools; 6/30/16

• AR 01293078; Revise EOF Procedure to Assist Sites in Obtaining Fuel and Water

• AR 02685173; Failure to Test Unit 2 Essential Service Water Piping to Full Pressure;

• AR 02685356; FLEX Storage Building Not In Accordance with Design; 6/24/16

• GT 2016–5194; FSG–401 Attachment 3 Title Error; 04/25/16

• AR 2016–5222; FLEX Support Guide; Add Overall Map and Deployment Path; 04/25/16

• AR 2016–5280; Copy of FSG–511 Located at ISFSI Fuel Mule Not Current; 04/26/16

• AR 2016–5281; DC Deep Load Shed Breakers are Inconsistently Labeled; 04/26/16

• AR 2016–5287; Tracking of CAT Loaders While they are in Use; 04/26/16

• AR 2016–5288; Assess if Recovery Procedure EOF-002 Can be Improved; 04/26/16

• AR 2016–5290; Procedure 1–OHP–4027–FSG–201, Figure 3, Depicts a Hose Storage

• AR 2016–5291; Mismatch Between Procedure and Breaker Label; 04/26/16

• AR 2016–5292; Procedure 2–OHP–4027–FSG–201, Figure 3, Depicts a Hose Storage

• AR 2016–5293; FLEX Storage Box Stored too Near to TDAFWP Piping; 04/26/16

• AR 2016–5317; Add direction to FSG–311 to Provide Strainer Backwash Direction;

• AR 2016–5334; Error in FLEX Equipment Staging Procedure on Alternate Power

• AR 2016–5339; Assess the Deep Load Shed Procedure to see if Operating Crews can

• AR 2016–5340; Procedures 1(2)-OHP–4027–FSG–6; “Alternative CST Makeup;” does

• AR 2016–5343; Add Labeling for FLEX to Several Hose Reels; 04/27/16

• AR 2016–5344; ECA 0.0 Takes the Time to Strip Loads off of Buses that are not

• AR 2016–5356; Improve the Usability and Efficiency of Various Strategy Options;

• AR 2016–5397; Evaluate if Establishing Temperature Checks in the FLEX Storage

• AR 2016–5398; Prioritization of Hydrogen Ignitor Energization Enhancement; 04/28/16

• AR 2016–5374; A Non-installed Valve was Incorporated into 1–OHP–4027–FSG–2;

• 2086588, Equipment Description in FSG different than in-field conditions


[email protected]

ti-2515/191 inspection prepatation webinar

Business