Thursday, March 7, 2011Daily Heraldthe Brown

Since 1891vol. cxlvi, no. 44

56 / 37

t o m o r r o w

54 / 35

t o d aynews...................2-8arts.......................9editorial.............10opinions.............11city & state........12insid

e

Campus News, 7

Movin’ on upalpert med school jumps to 28th in national rankings

Gets sweet and salty, defends its reality

post-, iNsiDe wea

therPost -

BCA ticket process hits snags again

By EMMa WohlSenior Staff Writer

Malicious outside software may have interfered with the Brown Concert Agency’s ticketing website Wednesday morning. BCA made Spring Weekend concert tickets available for sale at 8 a.m., but stu-dents were unable to access the website until 8:30 a.m.

“As many are likely aware, the TouchNet server that handles our online ticket sales (had) some trou-ble this morning,” read a notice on BCA’s website posted Wednesday morning. “As of now, all we know is that there was (an) artificially high number of requests to the TouchNet server that are likely the result of malicious software, rather than any problems stemming from BCA, (Brown Student Agencies) or TouchNet itself,” read another notice posted later in the day.

One thousand tickets for each day of the event went on sale at 8 a.m. on Brown Marketplace. BCA had worked with BSA — which manages the site where tickets were sold — and TouchNet, the company that manages the server, to ensure that high activity to the site would not cause the server

Structure complete, fitness center to open next MarchBy GrEG Jordan-dEtaMorE

Senior Staff Writer

“Let’s lift the beam!” President Ruth Simmons urged a crowd of about 150 yesterday at a “topping off ” ceremony for the new fitness and aquatics center currently un-der construction. Moments later, the last piece of steel for the build-ing’s structure fell into place.

“No longer will our cardio equipment be in the hallway or in the corner of the gym,” Michael Goldberger, director of athletics, told the crowd. The new building will be “a tremendous benefit for the entire Brown community.”

The $48.1 million project, which is entirely donor-funded, is slated to open next March, said Project Manager John Cooke.

He said the building, which will

be next to the Olney-Margolies Athletic Center, will stand out as “a classic-style brick building.” It in-cludes a fitness center, pool, varsity training center and green space for the athletic complex.

The building will provide a new permanent pool to replace the temporary aquatics bubble, which was installed January 2008 after the old Smith Swim Center was closed due to major structural problems.

“We made the best of what we had,” Sam Speroni ’11, a co-captain of the men’s swimming and diving team, told the crowd. Speroni said he is happy the new pool will open next year and added it will be “one of our finest recruiting assets.”

“It’s nice that we’ll finally have a

Housing lottery sees tears, jeers

By KylE McnaMaraContributing Writer

The first 460 housing groups arrived yesterday in Sayles Hall to select their rooms for next year during the first night of this year’s hous-ing lottery. The lottery began a few minutes after 6 p.m., kicking off a two-night event that promised to deliver tension, panic and elation.

The selections began with Anne Oram ’12, a rising fifth-year senior, who chose a single in Slater Hall with the first pick in the lottery.

Melanie Berger ’13 — the leader of the fourth group — along with another sophomore, is rooming with a rising fifth-year senior and, as a result, was elevated to a high pick for a sophomore. As the first triplet group of the night, Berger said she was sure that they would get their first-choice three-person suite on Vartan Gregorian Quad. “You can see the river from the lounge and two rooms,” Berger said, explaining the reason for their high-rise choice. “We have big plans for the lounge,” Berger said. She said she received emails from concerned three-person groups wanting to know her group’s planned pick so they could strategize.

Group six launched a slew of “no shows” that were met with rowdy applause. But as the “no shows” became more frequent, the crowd’s cheer grew quieter. “I can’t believe how many ‘no shows’ there were,”

Simmons to UCS: no more budget cutsBy david chunGSenior Staff Writer

The University does not intend to make any further budget cuts in response to the economic decline of 2008 and is moving forward with a number of initiatives including expansion of the School of Engi-neering and improvement of stu-dent residences, President Ruth Simmons told the Undergraduate Council of Students at its general body meeting last night. Simmons responded to student questions re-

garding the University’s agenda and projects.

She did not comment on the re-cent curricular changes for concen-trations controlled by the Watson Institute of International Studies but stressed that the institute’s re-search focus and identity are be-ing reexamined. The University is “legally bound” to an agreement indicating the purpose of the in-stitute that was reached by the Watson family and Brown when the institute was established. Some individuals have raised concerns

about the institute’s current focus, and its board is currently working with the University to determine what its “specific foci” should be. Simmons said she does not expect these efforts to affect students in the immediate future.

The University also intends to make strides in student housing with renovations beginning this summer. Citing the complicated process of coordinating housing placements with construction and

Simmons’ approval rating down 12 percentBy JaMiE BrEW

Contributing Writer

President Ruth Simmons’ approval rating fell to 62.5 percent this se-mester, down from 74 percent last semester, according to last month’s Herald poll. Less than half of students had an opinion of the Corporation’s job performance.

Of the 62.5 percent students who approved of Simmons, 30.3 percent strongly approved and 32.2 some-what approved. Last semester, 34.8 percent strongly approved of Sim-mons and 39.2 somewhat approved. This semester, the poll offered “Not familiar enough to answer” and “No opinion” as separate responses. Past polls offered a single response of “Don’t know / No answer.”

Two students cited Simmons’ ser-vice on the board of the Goldman Sachs Group as a possible reason for the slip in her approval ratings. Sim-mons announced in February 2010 that she would not seek reelection to the investment bank’s board.

Ronald Ehrenberg, professor of industrial labor relations and eco-nomics at Cornell, said the popularity of college presidents can fluctuate based on a multitude of factors. He said there was no single reason to expect a president’s approval rating to fall over time.

The drop in approval, instead of reflecting opposition to Simmons’ specific actions, may instead be a re-sult of a less informed student popu-lation. This semester 25.0 percent of students said they were not familiar enough to make a judgment about Simmons, up from 20.1 percent who responded “Don’t know / No answer” last semester. This semester 8 percent responded “No opinion.”

Ben Winkler ’11.5 said his opin-ion of Simmons was “not really based in much real fact,” but was “mostly in line with the student population’s hype, the idolization of Simmons as an icon.”

“I have no idea what she’s been

Greg Jordan-Detamore / HeraldA crowd looked on as the new fitness and aquatics center’s structure was completed at a ceremony yesterday.

continued on page 2

continued on page 8

continued on page 6continued on page 2

continued on page 6

Do you approve or disapprove of the way Ruth Simmons is handling her job as president of the University?

Gili Kliger / Herald

doing, but I’d trust her with my life,” he said.

Students also tended to have fairly limited knowledge of the Corpora-tion, the University’s highest gov-

erning body. The Corporation is re-sponsible for choosing the president, approving the University budget and making high-level policy decisions. About 42.9 percent of student re-spondents this semester, including 55.9 percent of first-years, said they

were not familiar enough with the Corporation to make a judgment. A further 15.9 percent responded that they had no opinion of the Cor-poration.

Thirty percent of respondents ap-proved and 11.1 percent disapproved.

This represents a dramatic de-cline in student awareness of the body from the most recent previous poll on student approval of the Corporation, which was conducted in spring 2009 and showed only 37 percent respond-ing “Don’t know / No answer.”

Michael Becker ’13 said he strong-ly disapproves of many recent actions taken by the Corporation, which he said is operating with “a very strong profit motive.”

Becker, who said he was attracted to Brown because of its active stu-dents and professors and Corpora-tion members who seemed to be interested in social justice, cited the Corporation’s efforts to make tenure more selective and the administra-tion’s handling of negotiations with Brown Dining Services workers as two reasons why he believes that ap-propriate concern for the employees and the community “has not been reflected in the policies of either Sim-mons or the Corporation.”

“It’s a little unnerving — what is the Corporation?” asked Nam Pham ’13, adding that while he did not know much about its operations, he suspected that it “may not have Brown’s best interests in mind.”

“I don’t really know what the Cor-poration does other than that they make decisions,” said Hana Ward ’11. “I don’t know who they are, if they are here on campus a lot or where they are. They’re pretty anonymous.”

Ben Schreckinger, PresidentSydney Ember, Vice President

Matthew Burrows, TreasurerIsha Gulati, Secretary

The Brown Daily Herald (USPS 067.740) is an independent newspaper serving the Brown University community daily since 1891. It is published Monday through Fri-day during the academic year, excluding vacations, once during Commencement, once during Orientation and once in July by The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. Single copy free for each member of the community. POSTMASTER please send corrections to P.O. Box 2538, Providence, RI 02906. Periodicals postage paid at Providence, R.I. Subscription prices: $280 one year daily, $140 one semester daily. Copyright 2011 by The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. All rights reserved.

www.browndailyherald.com195 Angell St., Providence, R.I.

Daily Heraldthe Brown

edIToRIAl(401) 351-3372

herald@browndailyherald.com

BuSIneSS(401) 351-3360

gm@browndailyherald.com

Campus news2 the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

4 P.m.

Slavery’s Capitalism Conference:

Keynote Address, Salomon 101

7 P.m.

Glenn Greenwald: “Civil Liberties in

the Age of Obama,” Salomon 001

7 P.m.

MCM@50: Passion, Theory, Practice,

MacMillan 117

8 P.m.

BUGS presents: “Princess Ida!”

Alumnae Hall Auditorium

SHARPE REFECTORY VERNEY-WOOLLEY DINING HALL

LUNCH

DINNER

Roast Turkey with Stuffing, BBQ Beef Ribs, Carrots Vichy, Flourless Raspberry Black Satin Fudge Cake

Roast Turkey, Vegan Roasted Vegetable Stew, Mashed Potatoes,

Raspberry Satin Fudge Cake

BBQ Beef Ribs, Basmati Rice Pilaf, French Toast, Sausage Patties, Oatmeal Butterscotch Cookies

Asian Sesame Chicken Salad, Crispy Thai Tofu, Cucumber and Chickpea

Salad, Oatmeal Butterscotch Cookies

TODAY APRIL 07 TOmORROW APRIL 8

AC R O S S TO B e A R

S U D O K U

M e n U

C A L e n DA R

to crash, said Abby Schreiber ’11, BCA’s booking chair.

Students were frustrated by the website’s problems. “The website crashed three times in the process of putting (the tickets) in my cart,” said Ben Peipert ’13, adding that he was able to buy his tickets after 35 minutes of reloading the page.

“I got on before eight and re-freshed the page, but it wouldn’t load,” said Joshua Prenner ’14, who said he was unable to purchase tickets.

Based on last year’s online ticket sales, students said they were not surprised by the website’s slow speed.

Last year,“I waited up until 8:30

and didn’t get tickets,” Peipert said. “I kind of expected it,” Prenner

added. “I heard the site crashes.” But he said he thought the sales might go smoother because tickets are being released over the span of three days.

“After it happened last year, we were frustrated and upset, so we really sat down to strategize,” Sch-reiber said. Part of the strategy was stretching the process over three days and limiting ticket sales to one per student, she said.

“Although the situation is still being fully diagnosed, it is my un-derstanding that whatever slight delay there was today was not nec-essarily related to what happened last year, as extra precautions were made by Brown — BCA and BSA

— and TouchNet to address the issues from last year,” she wrote in an email to The Herald.

“Anything that was in our con-trol, we did,” Schreiber said, add-ing that the problems are not “an issue of human error on the part of BCA, BSA or even the company handling the sales.”

BCA posted on its website this morning that the issues would be resolved for today’s and tomor-row’s sales, but an updated post later in the day did not mention how the problems would affect later sales.

Schreiber said she is not wor-ried, and students should not be either. “Take a deep breath — we have two more days of ticket sales,” she said.

Slow BCA ticket site frustrates buyerscontinued from page 1

Poll: students unfamiliar with Corp.continued from page 1

Got tips?

herald@

browndailyherald.com

Campus news 3the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

New methods shed light on brain science behind decisionsBy Sofia caStEllo y ticKEll

Staff Writer

In a tiny beige room in Sidney Frank Hall, the doors to decision-making are being unlocked. Moni-tors hum and chairs swivel as the next study participant prepares to take her turn, leaving her backpack by the door and signing off on a consent form.

A bucket of salty electrolyte solution sits on the table. What appears to be a complicated swim-ming cap made of white mesh and dotted with blue and red elec-trodes floats in the liquid. This apparatus measures neural activity for an EEG, or electroencephalo-gram, which enables researchers to monitor the brain’s activity dur-ing a task and record its levels in specific areas.

Jim Cavanagh, a postdoctoral research assistant in the Labora-tory of Neural Computation and Cognition, extracts the dripping apparatus and brings it over to rest on the participant’s head. This new kind of recorder no longer re-quires the use of messy conductive gel, he explains, as he massages the dots into the participant’s scalp. The device can gather readings using nothing but water, and it straps on easily, so the process of preparation is relatively short.

“It takes a lot of process-ing to pull out exactly what we were doing, but until then, it just looks like this ocean of activity,” Cavanagh explains, pointing to a landscape of squiggly black lines etched across the screen of a large monitor.

These imaging methods, along with behavioral analysis, can vali-date researchers’ hypotheses about which regions of the brain are in-volved in cognitive processes, adds Anne Collins, the postdoc who developed the task, from her perch on a black chair.

The researchers tap some se-cret commands onto a keyboard, and off the participant goes. She is presented with a series of simple exercises. Shapes and colors flash before her eyes, but as fingers try to move quickly, her eyelids be-come heavy.

Meanwhile, the cap on her head takes careful measurements of her neural activity, tracking valuable data that will help to untangle the complicated processes behind de-cision-making. It is so accurate that it is possible to discern the blink of an eye in the resulting graph.

In this experiment, the cap specifically measures interactions between the prefrontal cortex and the basal ganglia, two sections of the brain involved in decision-making.

“It’s like a game of telephone,” explains Christina Figueroa, a lab manager. “While your prefrontal cortex is telling a different part of your brain to do something or perform a certain action, that other area will loop back around and tell the prefrontal cortex to do something or not do something.”

Figueroa goes on to describe the basal ganglia as a “dam,” with lots of different paths and op-tions coming in from other parts of the brain. She says it acts as a

“gatekeeper,” driven by certain neurotransmitters to select what behaviors are ultimately executed.

Figueroa’s research team looks to combine the two aspects of cognition that tend to be studied separately — the learning and the structural — in order to gain a fuller picture of the system. Much of the lab’s work centers on using computational models to predict human behavior.

“A Parkinson’s patient versus a healthy senior can perform dif-ferently on a task, and that can tell us something about how the brain works and build a computational model to perform the same way,” Collins says.

The lab can have 10 to 12 proj-ects running at once, all of which investigate the learning and deci-sion-making process.

“When you actually break it down to your daily activities, you make decisions every moment of every day, whether it’s to get up in the morning, where you’re going to go,” Figueroa says. “You can see how vital that process is to under-standing ourselves.”

The decision-making process can be influenced by everything from environment to genetics, and experiments require careful tinkering to tease apart the influ-ence of different factors and hone in on fundamental processes. “In order to tap into those, we need to create tasks simple enough to be able to pinpoint certain func-tions,” Figueroa says. “It can’t be a videogame.”

Figueroa admits that psy-chological testing is “somewhat

notorious” for its uneventful ex-periments — the research team has had participants fall asleep at the monitor, or click the same button disinterestedly through-out the session. “We can’t use that data, because it’s not measuring the learning and decision making process,” Figueroa says. “It’s not giving us a good baseline or a good understanding. … It’s not compa-rable to any other participants.”

It can be difficult to understand the significance of an experiment as a participant. Access to infor-mation on a study is limited prior to the experiment because this knowledge can affect the way par-ticipants perform on a task.

“Only afterwards can you find out how cool our research really is,” Figueroa says, adding that she enjoys the debriefing process be-cause it gives subjects an idea of the importance of what they are doing beyond the compensation they receive.

“Imagine if you were really, re-ally curious about evolution and you had no Darwin and you had no book,” Figueroa says. “With-out participants, it’s like having no books in the library, nowhere to go to get that information.”

U. child care service gains popularity

By Sarah ManconEStaff Writer

Now in its second year, the Univer-sity’s subsidized care program for family of faculty and staff members has received overwhelmingly posi-tive feedback, according to Drew Murphy, director of benefits for human resources. About 340 — or 7.5 percent — of employees are registered for the program.

Between 18 and 20 employees used subsidized care each month in 2010, purchasing 4,850 total hours of care, including 400 elder care hours, Murphy said. The program is advertised as backup care, to be used in emergencies or while em-ployees are traveling.

The co-pay for backup care is $2 per hour for in-center care and $4 per hour for home care for up to three children, Murphy said.

Work Options Group provided child care when the program began September 2008, but the company

continued on page 4

was taken over by Bright Horizons Family Solutions January 2009,

Murphy said.The number of faculty and staff

members using the program has continued to grow. “I think more

and more as the program is used and people hear from their col-leagues that it has worked out well, the utilization is growing,” Murphy said.

Faculty and staff used backup care during the winter to deal with snow and school cancellations, and usage was “almost 30 percent up in December,” he said. The number of backup-care hours used in De-cember increased from 364 hours in 2008 to 473 this year.

Parents are always reluctant to let a stranger care for their children. But, Murphy said,“Bright Horizons has a pretty rigorous screening pro-cess.”

Erika Edwards, assistant pro-fessor of biology, who has used the program multiple times, said many of the providers are regis-tered nurses. “Bright Horizons is basically vouching the caregivers for me,” she said.

“You’re getting a professional. You’re not just getting a babysitter — these are backup care providers,” Murphy said. “I guess I look at it as somebody comes up to your house and watches your children for $4 an hour. That’s a good deal.”

The program saves Edwards “a lot of money,” she said.

The program also allows faculty and staff members to come to work when they may not have previously been able to do so, Murphy said. It can be used anywhere in the country.

While traveling, Edwards was able to work in one room and have her son in the next room with a caregiver. She could go back and forth between the rooms to nurse. “That is the ultimate in accommo-dating a mother’s needs,” she added.

But “Brown could benefit from a more centralized and heavily subsidized daycare for infants,” Edwards said.

The Brown/Fox Point Early Childhood Education Center re-serves over half of its spots for chil-dren of faculty, staff and students, while infants are cared for at the

Taft Avenue Daycare Center. “Taft Avenue is not really up to par, and it’s not really convenient,” Edwards said.

“It’s very, very small, so it cer-tainly can’t accommodate the needs of the entire university and young kids,” said Vazira Zamindar, associ-ate professor of history.

“More child care and affordable child care would be a really good development for Brown,” Zamin-dar said.

— with additional reporting by Shefali Luthra

Campus news4 the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

Employee participation in backup child care program increasescontinued from page 3

Advertisement

said Eric Stix ’12. “It’s ridiculous.”The cheers were quickly coun-

teracted by boos prior to group 30 as more rooms in New Dorm were selected. As the night progressed, cheers and jeers gained new life and the audience returned to its familiar energetic roars.

Technical difficulties during the lottery — including brief “site er-ror” screens — did not appear to af-fect people’s ability to select rooms.

While early groups were more likely to receive their first picks, groups at the end of the double digits knew they needed to strat-egize. “We would prefer two suites on the same floor in (Young Or-chard Apartments),” Stix said. The remaining three members in Stix’s

group of 12 said they were trying to get a triple or three singles in the dorm.

By the time the group was called, all Young Orchard singles and triples were taken, so the group opted to take the two suites on the fourth floor as planned, and put the group of three in a suite on the third floor. “It worked out really nice,” Stix said.

“We have a notecard of rooms in Young O,” said Andrew Leber ’12, one of the seven members of group 104. He said his group was looking for apartment style dorms to house a group of three and a group of four. “We want a kitchen, singles and a bathroom in each,” Leber said about their ideal apartments.

A little while later, Leber sealed his group’s fate. “We got both first

picks,” Leber said. “We looked at rooms in the past, and it looked like we were going to get both of these,” he added.

Group 118 was a little less sure they would get their first picks. The group of seven was looking for singles, with six hoping to be on one floor in Andrews Hall. As rooms in Andrews were claimed, the group grew worried. “I refuse to do physical exercise. So if I’m all the way in Pembroke, I better have a nice room,” said group member Christen Dillard ’12.

The group was able to get six singles in East Andrews on two consecutive floors. “I’m happy,” Dil-lard said. “I have an okay room, so I’m okay with walking. The sinks make up for the distance, and I’m with my friends.”

Cries emerged as the last singles in New Dorm were taken by group 123. There were similar reactions when group 162 took the last An-drews singles. The crowd booed in the early 300s as the last gender-neutral triples in Pembroke were snatched.

Group 326 wanted Hegeman, a prime choice for many rising ju-niors, “because of its prime locale and its classy fire escapes,” said group member Joanna Zhang ’13. The group got its dorm of choice. “We just made the cut. Bitches were sniping that shit up,” Zhang said. “We didn’t get the primest of the prime, but we are still living there.”

Campus news6 the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

Cries of chagrin shake housing lottery

the impracticality of renovating an entire dorm at once, Simmons said the administration is working to gradually improve on-campus housing and hopes students will benefit from the changes within the next few years. The University is currently investigating the pos-sibility of hiring an outside firm that could bring changes quickly and efficiently to campus, she said.

In response to ongoing campus discussion about the possibility of bringing the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps back to Brown, Simmons said she is “not at all sure” what might happen. Because Brown is not a “follower,” she said she does not believe the decisions of other universities, including Harvard and Columbia, to lift their bans on the ROTC program will affect the University.

“Brown always goes its own way,” but the community should consider the idea, debate and ask questions, she said.

Simmons also reviewed the Uni-versity’s response to the economic downturn. At the onset of the crisis, the University faced pressure to im-mediately cut up to $100 million from its budget, Simmons said. She said she found the proposed cut “very unappealing” and recom-mended a three-step cut, spread

over a three-year period. She said she believed the University could make the necessary adjustments and recover from the crisis with time.

Following $30 million cuts from the budgets in fiscal years 2010 and 2011, Simmons said she does not anticipate additional cuts. “Brown has been very lucky,” she added.

The University modified projects that were in progress at the time of the economic crisis to reduce costs. Plans for a new building for the Alpert Medical School were sus-pended, and the University changed course to renovate the school’s ex-isting building. The administration also decided to renovate the Met-calf Research Laboratory instead of constructing a building for the Department of Cognitive, Linguis-tic and Psychological Sciences.

The University consolidated ad-ministrative services but decided to “insulate certain segments of the campus,” Simmons said, including students and academic programs.

At the meeting, Simmons also advised the council to focus on communication efforts to elicit donations to the student activities endowment. Stephen Robert ’62 P’91 promised a contribution of $1 million to the fund March 10. Sim-mons recommended UCS develop a marketing strategy to target and persuade potential donors.

Simmons addresses ROTC,response to economic crisis

continued from page 1

continued from page 1

By JEffrEy handlErStaff Writer

After an aberration last year, the Alpert Medical School jumped 21 spots to 28th in the U.S. News and World Report primary care rankings. Except for last year, when it ranked 49th, the Med School’s primary care ranking has hovered in the 20s for the past several years.

It also jumped three spots in the research ranking this year, from 32nd to 29th. The research ranking depends in part on fund-ing from the National Institutes of Health, said Edward Wing, dean of

medicine and biological sciences. The increase in the research rank-ing over recent years “represents what Brown has done, which is to improve its reputation steadily in research,” he said.

The Med School ranks 28th in primary care, a category deter-mined by academic reputation. Factors in the rankings include grade point average, MCAT scores, faculty-to-student ratio and per-centage of graduating students entering careers in primary care. “Brown has always ranked very high in that,” Wing said.

From 2007 to 2011, the Med

School ranked between 23rd and 29th in primary care every year except for 2010, when its rank-ing dropped to 49th. “The only thing we can think of is it must have been some mistake. It’s not consistent with the previous four or five years,” Wing said. “Nothing happened here in terms of some-thing unusual in primary care.”

In an email to The Herald, Rob-ert Morse, director of data research for U.S. News and World Report attributed the dramatic swing in Alpert’s primary care rankings to a change in the way the Med School reports the percentage of students entering primary care residen-cies. Wing did not respond to a follow-up request for comment on Morse’s explanation.

Wing is pleased with both of the Medical School’s rankings, he said. “In both of the categories we’re in the top quarter of medi-cal schools in the country. … Our students are terrific, and we keep getting better each year.”

“Unlike some other very estab-lished schools which don’t change very much, we’re a dynamic school, which is on the move,” he said.

Campus news 7the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

Med School’s jumps in rankings

thanks for reading, Mark Suckerbergs!

home,” said Michael McVicker ’13, a member of the swimming team.

one building, three namesThe new athletic building has

three sections, each with its own name — the Nelson Fitness Cen-

ter, the Katherine Moran Coleman Aquatics Center and the David Zucconi ’55 Varsity Strength and Conditioning Center.

The fitness center will include a roughly 10,000-square-foot workout space with large windows overlooking Hope Street and three dance studios, said Tom Bold, as-sociate athletic director for facili-ties.

The central section of the build-ing is the aquatics center, which will feature a 56-meter pool with seating for spectators and will host the water polo and swimming and diving teams. The temporary aquatics bubble cannot be used for competition, so the teams cur-rently have to travel elsewhere for meets.

The varsity strength and con-ditioning center, which will be three times larger than the cur-rent space, will be on the rear end of the building facing the athletic fields, said Stephen Maiorisi, vice president for Facilities Manage-ment.

But it will not have a public connection to the rest of the build-ing, he said, because its users will be limited to varsity athletes.

The top of the building will fea-ture a clock tower with the original cupola from Marvel Gymnasium, which was demolished in summer 2002, according to a University statement.

The new center will also include

environmentally friendly features, including solar panels — which will both supply electricity and provide hot water — and energy-efficient lighting and insulation, Cooke said.

The project is currently on schedule, and work on the build-ing has been going well despite the tough winter, he said, adding that the first floor’s concrete slab has been poured, and the others will be soon, after which walls can be put up. The pool is almost fully excavated, and much of the plumbing and drainage is in place, he said.

a ‘front yard’ for athletics“We’ve been talking about the

need for a fitness space for ath-letics since at least the late ’90s,” Bold said.

The squeeze for athletic space was relieved partially by the cre-ation of three satellite gyms. But those are only “Band-aids,” Bold said. There is still a shortage of athletic space, he said, citing how busy the OMAC is in the after-noons. The new athletic facility “certainly will address that need,” he said.

Original visions of a new ath-letic center were larger, but they were not financially feasible, Bold said. Through the planning pro-cess, “we got to a point where the size could meet the budget.”

The new facility will help ease

some of the burden on the OMAC, though the OMAC “will still be a busy place” because of the indoor track and basketball courts, Bold said. Some fitness equipment will stay in the OMAC, and the satellite gyms will remain open.

The fourth part of the project is the Ittleson Quadrangle, a new green space outside the building on what is currently a parking lot, which will create a “front yard” for the athletic complex, Maiorisi said. It will be a location for students to meet, gather and hang out, he added.

Construction on the football field-sized quad will begin soon and will likely be completed around October, before the build-ing itself opens, Cooke said.

“I think the campus can always use more green space,” Bold said, though he added that some people are worried about the loss of park-ing.

There will still be a small park-ing area that will be used for hand-icapped parking for major events, and for drop-off and pick-up only, Maiorisi said. To compensate, the land currently home to the tem-porary aquatics bubble will be de-veloped into a parking lot when the bubble comes down, he said.

But “the bubble will not be taken down until we’re in the new facility,” Bold said.

“That’s going to be a little bit of a squeeze for a while,” Cooke said.

Campus news8 the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

New athletic center to include varsity team space, ‘green’ featurescontinued from page 1

Arts & Culture 9the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

BB & Z | Cole Pruitt, Andrew Seiden, Valerie Hsiung and Dan Ricker

Cloud Buddies! | David emanuel

Dot Comic | eshan Mitra and Brendan Hainline

CO M I C S

Noser commits murder in first-ever theatrical performanceBy KriStina fazzalaro

artS & Culture editor

Every murder mystery has its key components — an eccen-tric detective generally prone to monologues, a suspicious butler, a weapon and a thunderclap or two. A barrel of laughs, though, might not make the shortlist for integral ingredients — unless the writers behind the whodunit are the Brown Noser’s dynamic writ-ing duo Jamie Brew ’12 and Hallie Cantor ’11.

“The Storm of Mystery” — the Noser’s first-ever theatrical per-formance, to be staged tonight in Andrews Dining Hall — prom-ises audiences a plot full of twists and turns imbued with the clever comedy already appreciated by

the Noser’s readers. It combines sharp one-liners with deliciously entertaining back-and-forth com-mentary to provide something for everyone.

The production opens at the country house of Samuel Marlowe (David Brescia-Weiller ’14). An as-piring detective novelist, Marlowe has decided to crack the psychol-ogy of the human heart by staging a murder at his house with the per-fect cast of characters, including an eccentric older woman, a wealthy business man, two beautiful young women and a butler-in-chief.

The butler, Horace (David Ja-cobs ’14), steps up to the plate to listen to Marlowe’s expository monologues as he delineates the plot of his novel. The interactions between all of the cast members

are well-done, but Brescia-Weiller and Jacobs are especially hilarious. They deliver their banter rapidly, keeping the audience on its toes throughout the night.

Brew, a Herald contributing writer, said the idea to write a mur-der mystery first came to him and Cantor before winter break. They finished the script upon their ar-rival to campus in January, and from there, the production took off.

Though written by editors of the Noser, casting was open to all students. The assembled cast knows how to deliver a laugh, jib-ing with the Noser’s characteris-tic facetious tone. Cast members simultaneously provide depth to their characters that could have easily been written off as rote

personalities from past murder mysteries.

The key to the play’s success is due to both the work of the ac-tors and the attention to detail the writers paid when creating their characters. Brew and Cantor have successfully breathed new life into an old genre, oftentimes by doing what they do best — making fun of it. For example, Brescia-Weiller’s detective is more a caricature of Poirot, Poe and Holmes all rolled into one super-eccentric sleuth.

The setting of the production — Andrews Dining Hall — adds to the play’s overall ambiance. The carpeted floor and wall of windows successfully transport the audience to Marlowe’s country house. To play upon the production’s setting, generally associated with dining,

the Noser provides dinner for some members of the audience. Unfortunately, the 100 audience members who purchased addi-tional tickets made available due to high demand, will go hungry tonight — they will just have to fill up on laughter.

But they will certainly leave stuffed to the brim. The produc-tion is witty and chock-full of laughs while keeping the audience in suspense as scripted fantasy be-comes real in Marlowe’s house.

A clever original script, not short on monologues, promises danger and laughter lurking behind every corner.

Become our fan on Facebookfor news updates and more

facebook.com/browndailyherald

editorial10 the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

C O R R E C T I O N S P O L I C YThe Brown Daily Herald is committed to providing the Brown University community with the most accurate information possible. Corrections may be submitted up to seven calendar days after publication.

C O M M E N TA R Y P O L I C YThe editorial is the majority opinion of the editorial page board of The Brown Daily Herald. The editorial viewpoint does not necessarily reflect the views of The Brown Daily Herald, Inc. Columns, letters and comics reflect the opinions of their authors only.

L E T T E R S T O T H E E D I T O R P O L I C YSend letters to letters@browndailyherald.com. Include a telephone number with all letters. The Herald reserves the right to edit all letters for length and clarity and cannot assure the publication of any letter. Please limit letters to 250 words. Under special circumstances writers may request anonymity, but no letter will be printed if the author’s identity is unknown to the editors. Announcements of events will not be printed.

A D V E R T I S I N G P O L I C YThe Brown Daily Herald, Inc. reserves the right to accept or decline any advertisement at its discretion.

e D I TO R I A L CO M I C b y e r i k s tay t o n

“Bitches were sniping that shit up.”— Joanna Zhang ’13, on suites in Hegeman Hall

See lottery on page 1.

e D I TO R I A L

Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan visited the University of New Hampshire Monday, the same day President Obama officially announced his campaign for re-election. But this visit was no campaign rally. Instead, Biden and Duncan kicked off an effort to remind public schools and colleges of their responsibility under federal law to deal with sexual violence.

The U.S. Department of Education reports that “nearly 20 percent of college women will be victims of attempted or actual sexual assault, as will about 6 percent of undergraduate men.” Not here, we might respond, but as Duncan pointed out, “Every school would like to believe it is immune from sexual violence, but the facts suggest otherwise.” Indeed, Trish Bakaitis-Glover, sexual assault response and prevention program coordinator with Health Services, told The Herald last year that she has no reason to believe that the statistics would be different at Brown.

Federal law mandates that colleges receiving federal money devise “comprehensive guidelines for filing complaints, helping victims, disciplin-ing perpetrators and monitoring campus climates” in response to sexual violence. Brown administrators are surely well-intentioned, but regulatory pressure to improve the University’s response to sexual violence is welcome nonetheless. We hope the renewed emphasis on these regulations is last-ing, not merely a temporary reminder. Because few things can damage a campus’s reputation like rape and sexual assault, administrators have strong incentives to keep the details of sexual violence as quiet as possible. Furthermore, it is all too easy to lose sight of a response plan’s importance until tragedy strikes.

Events that took place last semester at University of Notre Dame un-derscore these points. Elizabeth Seeberg, a freshman at a nearby college, reported Sept. 1 that a Notre Dame football player sexually assaulted her the previous night. Campus police did not even interview the accused until 14 days after the report, and a few days after Seeberg committed suicide. While the accused continued to play in football games, the university did all it could to keep the story quiet. A few days after Seeberg’s report, another freshman told campus police she was sexually assaulted. Again, police did not interview the accused until 11 days later.

Brown has its own history of questionable responses to sexual violence. In 1997, the University settled a suit brought by Adam Lack, who was suspended for sexual misconduct before later being exonerated, and the University is a defendant in an ongoing case brought by William McCor-mick, who was compelled to leave after being accused of rape. Both cases raise questions about due process afforded to students accused of sexual violence. And, following a 1996 University Disciplinary Committee deci-sion not to hear a student’s sexual assault allegations, Brown was briefly investigated by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights.

While Brown maintains many laudable programs aimed at stemming sexual violence, these tribulations underscore the difficulty of handling accusations. We hope increased federal attention will ensure administra-tors stay focused on improving our policies, but students play perhaps an even greater role in combating sexual violence.

Yale is currently under investigation by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights for failing to eliminate a “hostile sexual environ-ment” after several high-profile incidents. Brown students have not made headlines in similar fashion, but we know such behavior occurs here. Even the most effective administrative response cannot change campus culture — only students can. We must strive to make Brown a place where sexual violence is completely unacceptable and where victims receive proper attention without stigma.

editorials are written by The herald’s editorial page board. Send comments to editorials@browndailyherald.com.

Q U OT e O F T H e DAythe brown daily herald

Kristina fazzalaroluisa robledorebecca Ballhausclaire Peracchiotalia Kaganhannah Moseralex Bellnicole Bouchertony Bakshiashley McdonnellEthan Mccoytyler rosenbaumhunter fastMichael fitzpatrick

abe Pressmanalex yulyStephanie londonhilary rosenthalnick Sinnott-armstrongJonathan Bateman

Graphics editorGraphics editor

photo editorphoto editorphoto editor

sports photo editor

Graphics & photos

Business

dan towneGili Kligeranna MigliaccioKatie Wilson

production

copy desk chiefdesign editordesign editordesign editor

editorial

arts & culture editorarts & culture editor

city & state editorcity & state editor

Features editorFeatures editor

news editornews editor

sports editorsports editor

asst. sports editoreditorial page editor

opinions editoropinions editor

Editors-in-chiEf

Sydney EmberBen Schreckinger

sEnior Editors

dan alexandernicole friedman

Julien ouellet

dEputy ManaGinG Editors

Brigitta Greeneanne Speyer

BloG dailY Heralddavid WinerMatt Klimerman

editor-in-chiefManaging editor

GEnEral ManaGErs

Matthew Burrowsisha Gulati

officE ManaGEr

Shawn reilly

dirEctors

aditi Bhatiadanielle MarshakMargot Grinberglisa Berlin

ManaGErs

hao tranalec KacewSiena delisservalery ScholemJared davislauren BossoEmily zhengnikita KhadloyaJames Engarjun vaidyaWebber Xu

salesFinance

alumni relationsspecial projects

national salesUniversity department sales

University student Group salesrecruiter sales

sales and communicationsBusiness operations

Business analyticsalumni engagement

special projectsspecial projectsspecial projects

Post- maGazineKate doyle editor-in-chief

Elephant in the room

opinions 11the Brown Daily heraldthursday, March 7, 2011

Recently, the Graduate School published a new policy for sixth-year funding. In short, it asks graduate students to com-pete and be ranked against each other for a limited pool of money that would go to-ward their sixth year of doctoral study. Although it is characterized by the Grad School as increasing clarity and efficiency, it strikes me as antithetical to the Univer-sity’s stated values.

Marc Howard Ross, a professor of po-litical science at Bryn Mawr College, de-fines policy as the distribution of tangible and symbolic benefits. In other words, all policies increase or decrease particular benefits or, more clearly, resources. What is more, policies reflect a community’s values. As Cris Shore and Susan Wright argue, policies are anthropological arti-facts. Although these authors write about policies in terms of government, their in-sight can be extrapolated to policies at any level. In this way, we can think of the new policy for sixth-year funding both as dis-tributing symbolic and tangible benefits as well as a statement on our values as a University.

Here is a University statement that re-flects on graduate students relating to

the Plan for Academic Enrichment: “To-day’s graduate students take courses, cre-ate knowledge, support faculty research and contribute to the teaching and men-toring of our undergraduates. Directing PAE resources to support the Graduate School has yielded significant results, as evidenced by the record numbers of ap-plicants, improved selectivity and our competitiveness with the very best of our peers.”

The statement recognizes the symbol-ic and tangible effects of quality gradu-ate students — they play a central role not only in the production of knowledge in their own disciplines but also in guid-ing undergraduate students. In addition, the plan comments on a particular culture that is cultivated for undergraduate, grad-uate and medical students alike — inde-pendence, energy, maturity, responsibility and self-directedness. Inevitably, mone-tary commitments are made to ensure the very best graduate students are attract-ed and supported while at Brown. What,

then, does it mean for this culture when doctoral students shift their energies to-ward being ranked at the top?

Speaking in March, Peter Weber, dean of the Grad School, clarified that most students who request sixth-year funding are candidates in the social sciences and humanities — and that external fund-ing for them is quite limited. It is simply the case that it usually takes around sev-en years for such candidates to complete

their dissertation work. This group will therefore be disproportionately affected by the new policy. Also aggravating is the fact that the amount of money they need to compete for remains unclear, and the criteria by which they will be ranked re-mains similarly vague.

As it stands, the statements and guide-lines define five years as the standard — the time by which graduate students should be done with their dissertation work. Because five years is characterized as normal, failure to stick to this deadline calls for a loss of funding. But those who

know of the process say that five years is unrealistic — especially for students in the social sciences and humanities.

As I think about this, I am not clear what problem this policy seeks to ad-dress. Are we simply out of money? Are new buildings needed? Are we trying to teach doctoral candidates to compete for funding so they are ready in the future? I am not sure. But this policy strikes me as having a negative effect on collegiality among the doctorate cohorts. Sure, com-petition can be healthy. In fact, all Brown students had to compete against peers to make it here. But how does one regulate such competition within a close commu-nity like ours? It seems unnecessary.

The Grad School does much to support students. Their current support of gradu-ate students should not be overlooked. But if we offer so many tangible and symbolic benefits to recruit the very best graduate students, we should also commit to their success while at Brown for as long as pos-sible. Yes, we should demand the very best from every single one of our graduate stu-dents — but as a University, we should be ready to match that commitment. Let’s not be sidetracked by policies that com-promise our investment and our values as a community of scholars.

Hector najera is a graduate student focusing in education.

Compromising University values

I understand that a massacre of people by the Libyan government would have been a tragedy — one that U.S. fighter planes helped to avert. But lives are lives, and I don’t believe Americans care as much as we say we do about the Libyan people. Is a good deed still good if the intentions aren’t right? Are lives lost on the opposing side any less precious?

I don’t believe that Americans are in-nocent — maybe confused, but innocent, never. When the U.S. government wages selfish wars, the American people feign in-nocence. But all the while we know in our hearts that we have no reason — no earthly reason — to trust our government, or Pres-ident Barack Obama for that matter. If our governing officials had the moral rectitude they claim to have — to which all the stupid adults who support this war also lay claim — then there wouldn’t be men and women eating out of trash cans. Can you imagine, in our own country, real human beings eat-ing out of the trash? And the White House officials have the nerve to say that the Unit-ed States of America is the keeper of moral uprightness in the world?

Some say we are there because Qaddafi is killing his own civilians. If this is true, what about the genocide in Darfur — why didn’t the U.S. conduct air raids then? How about the repression that has been hap-pening in Bahrain for the past year? What

hypocrisy! Morally speaking, they should have ousted a significant number of dicta-tors long ago, such as Arab monarchs who don’t allow their people to criticize govern-ment policy or to protest, as we have seen. Even in the U.A.E., one of the countries in the Middle East most friendly to the West, there is no democratic outlet for the peo-ple. The attitude of the government is this: If you don’t like it, leave. The American

government knows this, but I wonder, will they say anything?

This hypocrisy is so clear, and yet CNN, MSNBC and all the other liberal news net-works act like chickens without heads, leaping on the bandwagon with the wave of Obama’s hand. Why are the smartest talk-ing heads in the American media suddenly silent? Why?

Furthermore, America clearly does not respect Muslim lives in general. Ameri-can Muslim lives perhaps, but as far as the rest of them — my brothers and sisters —

are concerned, the American government doesn’t give a damn. To it, my brothers and sisters are just casualties. To get side-tracked a bit, people talk — and talk and talk — about improving the relationship between the Muslim community and the wider American community. Well, here’s an a solution: Tell the U.S. government to stop killing my brothers and sisters, get out of their land and stop pretending to be

morally superior by ousting a dictator with whom it was friendly only a couple years ago —read: Qaddafi.

Why do Americans have to pretend to be the heroes — the world has changed, and people no longer see America in that kind of light. We’ve shown our true colors more than once — Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Viet-nam — all examples of Americans shame-lessly killing other countries’ citizens.

One need only listen to the way Obama talks about Libyans — as helpless people, so thankful to great, big, strong America for

coming in and saving them from the nasty villain. It’s a set up. Some are thankful, but others aren’t — are we going to hear their story? Or are we just going to get the stan-dard, frustrating nonsense that America is once again standing up for the little guy — never mind that the little guy is standing on huge oil wells.

Perhaps this is irrelevant in this day and age, when governments act independently of their people’s will, but I don’t remember Obama or any of his officials ever asking if we, the American people, wanted to go to war in Libya. I may have voted, but that doesn’t mean I authorize more wars. There are American fighter jets in Libya that in-dict me with every bomb they drop, and I wonder why I was not even asked whether I thought this was a good idea. One min-ute all the talking heads are babbling about the madman Qaddafi, and the next we are dropping bombs on his forces. Do they take me for a fool? Doesn’t this sound like a set up? If we had had some balanced re-porting on Qaddafi, with some historical perspective on past relations between Libya and the U.S., then wouldn’t all the Obama administration’s grand visions of portray-ing themselves as the moral paragon for the world have been dashed by the people’s insistence that it fix the problems in this country?

There President Obama stands, lying to the American public, just as President George W. Bush did. It’s Deja vu.

nida Abdulla ’11.5 is an english concen-trator from new Jersey. She can be con-

tacted at nida_abdulla@brown.edu.

Another selfish war

Perhaps this is irrelevant in this day and age, when governments act independently of their people’s will,

but I don’t remember Obama or any of his officials ever asking if we, the American people,

wanted to go to war in Libya.

yes, we should demand the very best from every single one of our graduate students — but as a University we

should be ready to match that commitment. Let’s not be sidetracked by policies that compromise our investment

and our values as a community of scholars.

By nIDA ABDULLAGuest Columnist

By HeCTOR nAJeRAopinions Columnist

Daily Heraldthe Brown

City & Statethursday, March 7, 2011

R.I. workers may face immigration checksBy clairE SchlESSinGEr

Contributing Writer

The Rhode Island Senate Judiciary Committee heard a bill March 22 that would require all non-govern-mental employers with more than three employees to check the im-migration status of job applicants in E-Verify, a federal employment verification database.

The committee recommended the bill be held for further study. But state Sen. Marc Cote, D-Woonsocket and North Smith-field, who proposed the bill in February, said he is hopeful the bill — with 20 co-sponsors and several other senators supporting it — will pass.

E-Verify is currently voluntary for employers in Rhode Island. About 2,800 employers in the state use E-Verify, according to Cote. Under the proposed bill, 18,000 companies would use it. Cote said over 95 percent of em-ployers who currently use E-Ver-ify are satisfied with the system because it is free, web-based and easy to use.

The only current procedure for checking the legality of job applicants is the I-9, a federal job registration form filed with the Department of Labor, but there is no mechanism to verify if the information provided is true. Job applicants can participate in fraudulent document trafficking to acquire counterfeit forms of identification and work authori-zation documents, Cote said. Such an operation was discovered in Pawtucket in February, he added.

There are an estimated 20,000 illegal immigrants in R.I., accord-ing to the Pew Hispanic Center, Cote said. In light of the state’s struggling economy and double-digit unemployment rate, the bill is designed to take care of Rhode Islanders, Cote said.

Colleen Conley, president and founder of the Rhode Island Tea Party, echoed this viewpoint. She said the Tea Party sees undocu-mented workers not as a social issue but as a fiscal one. The Tea

Party supports the bill because it sends the message that the state is serious about making sure citi-zens receive “whatever few jobs” are available, she said. The bill would show Rhode Island is not putting out a “welcome mat” for illegal immigrants thinking of coming to the state to look for a job, she said.

She said that illegal immigra-tion also puts a financial burden on taxpayers because they receive free healthcare, public education and English as a Second Language programs.

But Juan Garcia, president of Immigrants in Action, said Rhode Island’s Hispanic com-munity brings “more economic power to the state.” Rhode Island benefits on many levels if more people are working, regardless of their citizenship status, he said.

Cindy Butler, legislative di-rector for the Rhode Island State Council of the Society for Human Resource Management, wrote in her testimony to the Senate com-mittee that although the council is “committed to hiring only work-authorized individuals,” E-Verify is the “wrong choice” for Rhode Island. She cited problems of “er-roneous tentative non-confirma-tions,” a mistake that arises from the system failing to understand hyphenated, abbreviated or mul-tiple surnames. These types of names, more common among employees of Hispanic and Arab descent, can lead to a dispropor-tionate number of hiring denials among these ethnic groups and can be considered discrimination, she said.

But Terry Gorman, executive director of Rhode Islanders for Immigration Law Enforcement, said E-Verify is 99.6 percent ac-curate.

If an employer checks an ap-plicant’s status in E-Verify and discovers a problem with im-migration status, the applicant has eight days to contact the U.S. Social Security Administration to clear up the problem. This time frame can be extended if Social

Security officials believe there is potential for an administrative error, such as an overlooked name change.

But Alexandra Filindra, a Brown postdoctoral research as-sociate in public policy special-izing in American immigrations, said the process to correct this is “complicated and onerous,” so immigrants could be penalized because of errors in the database.

“E-Verify continues to remain vulnerable to identity theft,” But-ler said, because “unauthorized workers (can) use stolen or bor-rowed Social Security numbers” and other fake identification.

E-Verify only addresses a mi-nor part of the complicated is-sue of immigration, Filindra said. For example, though it checks the status of employees, there is no mechanism to ensure that em-ployers will not hire the illegal applicants anyway and “abuse undocumented labor,” she said. She added that the private labor market is where many abuses oc-cur, and since many illegal im-migrants are hired by families to be babysitters, house cleaners or landscapers — which “falls out of the scope of E-Verify” — the bill would do nothing to address the social costs or labor abuses as-sociated with illegal immigration.

The E-Verify bill is an “in-sufficient and erroneous way to go about solving the problem” of undocumented immigration, Filindra said. She said the bill would not deter illegal immi-grants from coming to Rhode Island and would do nothing to address the “presence of 10 mil-lion undocumented people (in the United States) who are not likely to go away.”

Under former governor Don-ald Carcieri ’65, the state used E-Verify to check the status of all state job applicants. Gov. Lin-coln Chafee ’75 P’14 ended the practice when he took office in January. Mike Trainor, spokesman for Chafee, said the governor’s position remains unchanged and called E-Verify a “divisive tool.”

ProJo sees print circulation drop, considers online pay wallBy MorGan JohnSon

Staff Writer

Facing declining advertising reve-nue and circulation, national news-papers like the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal are erecting pay walls to stay afloat. The Providence Journal could be next.

The ProJo, the state’s largest newspaper, first announced its intention to limit online content to paying subscribers and update its website in November 2009, though it has not yet told the pub-lic or its reporting staff when the pay wall will go into effect. Last month, the paper’s management promoted then-vice president of

business and interactive develop-ment Deborah Tomilson to oversee its online strategy.

The paper has lost 10 percent of its print circulation in the last year — double the nationwide average decline. The number of visitors to the ProJo’s website fell last year from 1.26 to 1.19 million.

The ProJo’s parent company, A. H. Belo, has also suffered sig-nificant revenue losses — $124.2 million last year — according to its latest financial filings.

“The Journal’s had a lot of cut-backs in the last few years,” WRNI political analyst Scott MacKay told The Herald. Flagging advertising revenue is a big reason for the upcoming pay wall, MacKay said.

Advertising revenue depended on companies in industries that fared poorly during the recent eco-nomic downturn, said Journal re-porter John Hill. “Everyone in the business has been thinking about it,” he said of pay walls. “Regardless of whether it works or not, I think it’s important that they’re trying it.”

The newspaper has outlined the planned format for its new website. It would feature short summaries of articles for free and limit ac-cess to full articles to subscribers, Hill said.

Many newspapers across the country are turning to pay walls, but other methods have proven successful, MacKay said. Other publications have made their ar-

ticles available on devices such as the iPad and Kindle. “I think some of the other papers are ahead of the ProJo in getting in that line,” MacKay said.

Tomilson will also be tasked with boosting “the newspaper’s presence on emerging digital plat-forms and devices,” according to a March 20 ProJo article.

A pay wall might prove more successful for the ProJo than for papers like A.H. Belo’s Dallas Morning News, which faces more regional competition. “The other guy might try to undercut you and go free,” Hill said. The ProJo’s dominance in Rhode Island allows more latitude for a paywall, he said.

Improving the paper’s website

will be critical to the pay wall’s success, since the current website is less user-friendly than those of other news organizations, MacKay said. “They should update their website if they’re going to charge money for it,” he said.

The New York Times intro-duced its own pay wall March 28. Currently, Brown’s dining halls provide 170 copies of the Times and 120 copies of the ProJo on weekdays, according to Residen-tial Dining Director Claire Sidla.

Pay walls are a good idea, said Julia Dahlin ’12. “I think that free news is an unsustainable model that leads to really bad journalism,” she said. “We need to be paying for content.”

Mayor and city labor union strike pay deal

By Kat thorntonSenior Staff Writer

Providence Mayor Angel Taveras signed an agreement Wednesday morning with the city’s largest labor union that will affect nearly 900 workers and save more than $26 million over the next four years. The city faces a $180 mil-lion two-year budget deficit.

The deal, approved unanimous-ly by members of Local 1033 of the Laborers’ International Union of North America, will affect city department workers — excluding police officers, firefighters, teach-ers and city management. The con-tract must also be approved by the Providence City Council.

Local 1033 agreed to a 1 per-cent pay cut effective July 1, a raise in health care co-payments, a wage freeze until January 2012 and a 15 percent reduction in starting salaries for new employees. The union also gave up the 1 percent cost-of-living adjustment that workers received in their previ-

ous contract.In exchange, the city prom-

ised there would be no layoffs for union workers.

“If we all join in sacrifice to-gether, we will get our financial house in order,” Taveras said.

Donald Iannazzi, business manager of the Local 1033, agreed that the city’s financial problems required concessions from the union.

“We had a desire to cause our city to survive in the crazy fiscal turmoil we find ourselves in,” Ian-nazzi said.

“It is certainly going to put a strain on our working families,” Iannazzi said, adding that the av-erage union employee now earns $31,000 annually. But he said the alternative would be a “lose-lose situation” because it would hurt both the workers and the city in the long term.

“We would rather all make con-cessions than have one member of our family unable to put food on their table,” he said.

9 9 P u r P l e B a l lo o n s

Lydia yamaguchi / HeraldPurple balloons adorned the Main Green yesterday to publicize Relay for Life.

Get The Herald delivered daily to your inbox — browndailyherald.com/register