threat assessment team (tat) orientation developed by usps eap/wei program september 2006 threat...
TRANSCRIPT
TTHREAT HREAT AASSESSMENT SSESSMENT TTEAMEAM
((TATTAT) ORIENTATION) ORIENTATION
Developed by
USPS EAP/WEI Program
September 2006
Threat Assessment Team Members
ORIENTATION AWARENESS
UPON COMPLETION OF THIS ORIENTATION, THE PARTICIPANT SHOULD BE AWARE OF:
USPS commitment to a strategic plan for reducing violence in the workplace
USPS approach to Threat Assessment Team process
Importance of implementing a local Threat Assessment Team
2
TRAINING OBJECTIVES
UPON COMPLETION OF THIS ORIENTATION, THE PARTICIPANTS SHOULD BE ABLE TO
HAVE A WORKING KNOWLEDGE OF:
USPS commitment to preventing violence in the workplace
USPS approach to the Threat Assessment Team process including:
investigating, identifying and analyzing cause(s)
suggesting a course of action maintaining appropriate records
3
TRAINING OBJECTIVES
The importance of implementing a local Threat Assessment Team
Addressing violence prevention issues
Recognizing situations or conditions which could lead to violence
Understanding the difference between Threat Assessment Teams and Emergency Management Teams
4
WORKPLACE VIOLENCE
The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration defines workplace violence as the
following:
Threatening, intimidating, abusive, harassing, or violent behavior that is verbal, written, or physical toward others, including co-workers, customers, contractors, suppliers, and visitors to the company
Physically fighting, including pushing, shoving, slapping and punching, on company premises or while conducting company business
5
WORKPLACE VIOLENCE
Possessing firearms, explosives, or other weapons that are intended by their design or function to inflict fatal injury
Willfully destroying company property or the property of others engaged in company business
Engaging in acts of sabotage designed to damage the effectiveness of the company or any individual associated with it.
6
WORKPLACE VIOLENCE
Any definition of workplace violence must be broad enough to encompass the full range of behaviors that can cause injury, damage property, impede the normal course of work, or make workers, managers, and customers fear for their safety.
ASIS International. (2005) Workplace Violence and Prevention Response. Alexandria, VA
7
NON-FATAL WORKPLACE VIOLENCE
8
Non-Fatal Workplace Assaults
Average 33,000 incidents of Workplace Violence per week in America
Majority are simple assaults
Of all violent crimes, 18% occurred at work
NIOSH, 1992-1999 BJS, National Crime Victimization Survey
NON-FATAL WORKPLACE VIOLENCE
9
Each year 1.7 million workers fell victim to non-fatal workplace violence
Non-fatal violent crime = simple or aggravated assault, robbery, or rape/sexual assault
95% of these 1.7 million incidents were simple assaults
RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS FOR WORKPLACE VIOLENCE
10
Knowledge of the scale of workplace violence remains incomplete
Not a consistent system of data collection or standardized or uniform definitions
Data regarding the less severe forms of workplace violence are particularly sparse
Data is also weak with respect to the economic and human costs of workplace violence and the effectiveness of known strategies
RESEARCH & PROGRAM TRENDS
Classification System (Type І, ІІ, ІІІ, ІV) (common to research reviews and programs)
Categorizes workplace violence incidents according to the relationship of the
perpetrator to the victim (not to be associated with our priority 4 rating scale) Can prove helpful to those seeking to
better understand the issue
Helpful in developing prevention and response strategies
11
RESEARCH & PROGRAM TRENDS
Type І:
Offender has no legitimate relationship to the workplace or the victim and usually enters the workplace to commit a criminal action such as a robbery or theft.
This type also includes terrorist and hate crimes such as the World Trade Center and the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building attacks.
12
RESEARCH & PROGRAM TRENDS
Type ІІ:
This offender is the recipient of some service provided by the victim or workplace and may be either a current or former client, patient, or customer.
13
RESEARCH & PROGRAM TRENDS
Type ІІІ: This offender has an employment-related
involvement with the workplace.
The act of violence is usually committed by a current or former employee, supervisor, or manager who has a dispute with another employee of the workplace.
This type of workplace violence is usually referred to as the “disgruntled employee”.
14
RESEARCH & PROGRAM TRENDS
Type ІV This offender has an indirect involvement with the workplace because of a relationship with an employee and may be a current or former spouse or partner, someone who was in a dating relationship with the employee, or a relative or friend.
Usually follows the employee into the workplace from the outside, however, the relationship could have workplace origins as well.
15National Victim Assistance Academy (2002). Workplace Violence. Chapter 22. Participants’ Resource Guide. U.S. Department of Justice.
16
We take pause to honor and
remember those postal
employees whom we have
lost to the hands of violence.
Memorial in Edmond, Oklahoma
HISTORICAL PERSEPCTIVE
17
National Headlines from USPS History
The next few slides present a limited chronology of workplace violence incidents and/or fatalities
The list is not intended to be a comprehensive report or record, the intent is to review a number of incidents that tended to capture local and/or national headlines
These slides also provide a backdrop for discussion of stories and impact from individuals of what might be their own experience
Note: Facilitator can use the supplemental presentation that provides a brief description as to the listed incidents
HISTORICAL PERSEPCTIVE
18
National Headlines from USPS History
YEAR LOCATION VIOLENCE TOLL
2006 Baker City, OR 1 postal worker killed
2006 Goleta, CA6 postal workers killed, 1 suicide (previous employee)
2002 Kearny, NJ 1 postal worker killed, 3 wounded
1998 Dallas, TX 1 postal worker killed
1997 Milwaukee, WI1 postal worker killed, 2 wounded, 1 suicide
1997 Denver, CO 7 postal workers held hostage
1997 Miami Beach, FL1 civilian killed, 1 civilian wounded, 1 suicide
1996 Las Vegas, NV 1 postal worker killed
1996 Paterson, NJ 1 supervisor wounded by employee
HISTORICAL PERSEPCTIVE
19
National Headlines from USPS History
YEAR LOCATION VIOLENCE TOLL
1995 Palatine, IL 2 postal workers wounded by co-worker
1995 City of Industry, CA 1 postal worker killed
1995 Montclair, NJ 4 customers killed, 1 wounded
1993 Dearborn, MI2 postal workers killed, 2 wounded, 1 suicide
1993 Dana Point, CA1 postal worker killed, 1 wounded & 1 civilian (mother) killed, 4 wounded
1992 Citrus Heights, CA 1 postal worked suicide in post office
1991 Royal Oak, MI4 postal killed, 6 wounded, 1 suicide, 3 civilians shot
1991 Ridgewood, NJ 3 postal workers killed, 1 civilian killed
HISTORICAL PERSEPCTIVE
20
National Headlines from USPS History
YEAR LOCATION VIOLENCE TOLL
1989 Escondido, CA2 postal workers killed, 1 civilian killed, 1 suicide
1989 Boston, MA Post office sprayed with automatic rifle
1989 Poway, CA 1 postal worked killed himself in post office
1988 New Orleans, LA 1 postal worker killed, 3 wounded, 1 blinded
1988 Chelsea, MA 1 postal worker killed
1986 Edmond, OK14 postal workers killed, 6 wounded, 1 suicide
1985 New York, NY 1 postal worker wounded
1985 Atlanta, GA 1 postal worker wounded, 2 killed
1983 Anniston, AL 1 postal worker wounded, 1 killed
1983 Johnston, SC 2 postal workers wounded, 1 killed
WORKPLACE HOMICIDE
Over the last decade, the number of deaths have declined steadily
Peaked in 1994 at 1,080 deaths
There were 551 workplace homicides in 2004 (the most recent year for which data is available at this
update, statistics updated yearly through refresher)
551 is a 13% decline from 2003, and a sharp decline from a record high of 1,080 in 1994 (These figures exclude the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks)
21
WORKPLACE HOMICIDE
22
10801036
927860
714651 677
643609 632
559 564
50
250
450
650
850
1050
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
1994 - 2005
WORKPLACE HOMICIDE
23
While there was a decline in the rates of occupational homicide for the
health services and public administration industries, this decline
was not as great as the overall decline in occupational homicide
rates
Trend Line (1994 – 2005) Facts
Jenkins, L. Trends in workplace homicide, U.S., 1993-2002. The 7th World Conference on Injury Prevention and Safety Promotion, Vienna, Austria, June 6th-9th 2004. Vienna, Austria: Kuratorium für Schutz und Sicherheit/Institut Sicher Leben, 2004 Jun; :342
WORKPLACE HOMICIDE
24
When looking at the circumstance of the homicide, only homicides which
were robbery related has demonstrated a significant decline
Trend Line (1994 – 2005) Facts
WORKPLACE HOMICIDE
25
Neither the circumstances of violence by disgruntled customers/clients,
disgruntled workers/former workers, nor domestic violence demonstrated a significant decline in the number of occupational homicides during this
period
Trend Line (1994 – 2005) Facts
Hendricks, S. Anderson, K. Jenkins, L. (2005). Trends in rates of occupational homicides, 2005 National Injury Prevention and Control Conference, May 9-11, 2005, Denver, Colorado. Atlanta,
GA: Centers and Disease Control and Prevention, 2005 May; :105 (for slides 20, 21, & 22)
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ISWORKPLACE VIOLENCE
In the case of domestic violence, often what starts at home is completed at work
For employees being stalked, the workplace is the one location where the victim can
usually be found
Employees can change phone numbers and move, but most can’t switch jobs to avoid a stalker
Must also consider if the stalker/abuser is a postal employee as well, in the same
facility/station, on the same shift, etc.Kaufer, S. & Mattman, J. (2001) ‘Workplace Violence, A Manager’s Guide’,
Workplace Violence Research Institute, Palm Springs, CA. 26
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
As the statistics below show, employers can no longer consider domestic violence a private matter. It is a serious workplace issue that affects a company’s bottom line.
17% of women murdered at work are killed by their batterer 60,000 incidents of workplace violence involved
intimate partners 74 - 96% of victims are harassed at work by their batterer 50% of victims missed an average of 3 work days per
month due to abuse 30 - 44% of victims lost at least one job due to abuse Domestic violence cost businesses between $3 - 5 billion annually
27
VIOLENCE IN AMERICA
Contributing Factors Why Violence May Occur:
Societal Factors: drugs and alcohol availability of guns externalized blame reactions to diversity social disconnectedness economic downturn media glorification of violence violence themed video games and music
28
VIOLENCE IN AMERICA
Contributing Factors Why Violence May Occur:
Organizational Factors: job overload high stress environment reorganization, restructure poor labor / management relations poor or changing management styles poor hiring practices inadequate security no response to inappropriate behavior no employee counseling (EAP)
29
VIOLENCE IN AMERICA
Contributing Factors Why Violence May Occur:
Personal Factors: family / marital problems financial problems domestic problems drug and/or alcohol abuse loss of job, raise or promotion loss of relationship misdirected affections unmanaged stress
30
SKETCH OF SOCIAL TRENDS
31
Increase in Societal Tolerance of Violence Acceptance of violence as a form of communication (This first statement is a strong statement. Take some time for discussion. How do you see violence perceived pre- and post- 9/11? What about global implications?)
Increased accessibility to weapons
Less Control Over Work Environment Lack of careers, commitment, loyalty Job vs. career
Downsizing, Re-engineering Do more with less Loss of middle management
SKETCH OF SOCIAL TRENDS
32
Substance Abuse
Psychological Factors Increasing stress Breakdown of support systems Nuclear families Extended families Sense of neighborhood/community
Change Increasing pace of change Particularly organizational/work change Insatiable electronic media demands (24/7 news, internet)
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
PMG Henderson charged the commission to detail concrete steps for the Post Office to make the safest possible environment for all its employees
Conducted the most comprehensive survey ever conducted of
workplace violence in our nation
33
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE Bottom Line Conclusions:
“Going Postal” is a myth, a bad rap. Postal workers are no more likely to physically assault, sexually harass, or verbally abuse their co-workers than employees in the national workforce
Postal employees are only one third as likely as those in the national workforce to be victims of homicide at work
The level of violence throughout the American workplace is unacceptably high; in the year before
the study was released – 1 in 20 workers was physically assaulted, 1 in 6 was sexually
harassed, and 1 in 3 was verbally abused34
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
35
Three Highest Industrial Homicide Rates (National Comparison):
Retail Stores
Public Administration (including police)
Transportation/Mass Transit
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
36
0.260.50
0.77
1.321.66
2.10
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Workplace Homicide Rates By IndustryWorkplace Homicide Rates By IndustryPer 100,000 workers annually, 1992-98
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
USPS Workplace Homicides 1986-2005
Of 30 incidents:
16 were perpetrated by postal employees
14 perpetrated by non-postal employees
55 killed, including 49 postal employees
34 were murdered by current or former co-workers
37
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
National Workforce Demographics
Risk of Victimization: Highest Risk
Men 3 times more likely than women
Incidence rate rises with age
Higher for those 65 and older
African Americans are twice as likely as Caucasians
38
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
USPS Workplace Homicides 1986-2005
Of the homicides perpetrated by postal employees 14 out of 16 had:
violent histories
mental illness
substance abuse
and/or criminal convictions
39
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
Comparison to National Workforce
Postal employees scored as:
less angry
less aggressive
less hostile
less depressed
less stressed
than those in the national workforce40
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
41
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
Fly Off TheHandle
TroubleControlling
Temper
FriendsThink
"Hothead"
Flare UpQuickly
Am EvenTempered
USPS
NationalWorkforce
Anger: USPS vs. national workforceAnger: USPS vs. national workforce
18%
7%3%
25%
6%4% 7%4%
75%69%
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
Comparison to National Workforce
Postal employees:
have more negative attitudes about work, co-workers, and management
believe they are more likely to be a victim of workplace violence
greatest fears involve other co-workers
42
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
Comparison to National Workforce
Although postal workers are one-third less likely than the national workforce to be victims of violence at work, postal workers express six times more fear of becoming a victim than non-postal employees.
43
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
17%
3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
% EmployeesExpressing Fear of
WPV
USPS
NationalWorkforce
Comparison to National Workforce
44
Believe likelier than average worker to be victim of Believe likelier than average worker to be victim of co-worker violenceco-worker violence
0.26
0.77
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
Incidence ofWorkplace
Homicides per100,000
USPS
NationalWorkforce
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
Comparison to National Workforce
Postal workers are:
Six times more likely to believe they are at greater risk
What do you believe may be behind this perception that is not based on actual facts?
45
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
Comparison to National Workforce
Postal workers are:
less likely to agree that their employer takes action to protect them
more likely to say they fear being robbed or attacked
more likely to agree that management tries to provoke employees to violence
46
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
Postal workers are no more likely than those in the national workforce to:
physically assault
sexually harass or
verbally abuse their co-workers
47
CALIFANO COMMISSION ROLE
48
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Physical Assault Sexual Harassment Verbal Abuse
USPS
NationalWorkforce
Victimization by coworkersVictimization by coworkers
12%
3%
25%
4%
14%
30%
VIOLENCE PREVENTION
Workplace violence is now recognized as a specific category of violent crime that calls for distinct responses from employers, law enforcement, and the community.
This recognition is relatively recent. Prior to the Edmond shootings, the few research and preventive efforts that existed were focused on particular issues – ……….
49
National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime. (2002). Workplace violence: issues in response. Critical Incident Response Group. FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia.
VIOLENCE PREVENTION
50
Watson, Eleanor Lynn (2006). Active inaction-symbolic politics, agenda denial or incubation period: twenty years of U.S. workplace violence research and prevention activity, Dissertation, West Virginia University, [On-line Abstract].
The first national data on the incidence of workplace homicide was published by NIOSH in 1989.
This publication demonstrated on a national basis that homicide was the third leading cause of occupational injury death, exceeded only by motor vehicle crashes and machine related deaths.
This document also identified that homicide was the leading cause of injury death for women in the workplace. Prior to this publication, homicide had not been seriously regarded as an occupational health and safety issue.
VIOLENCE PREVENTION
Mass murder on the job by disgruntled employees are media-intensive events. However, these mass murders, while serious, are relatively infrequent events.
It is the threats, harassment, bullying, domestic violence, stalking, emotional abuse, intimidation, and other forms of behavior and physical violence that, if left unchecked, may result in more serious violent behavior.
These are the behaviors that supervisors and managers have to deal with every day.
51
National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime. (2002). Workplace violence: issues in response. Critical Incident Response Group. FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia.