there is no constitutional right to smoke ! smoke free housing seminar july 16, 2012
DESCRIPTION
THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012. Fair Housing Project Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County, Inc. Presented by: Jean Marie Middleton, Esquire WITH ASSISTANCE FROM Nazli Sonmez Matt . - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE!
SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINARJuly 16, 2012
Fair Housing ProjectLegal Aid Society of Palm Beach County, Inc.
Presented by: Jean Marie Middleton, Esquire WITH ASSISTANCE FROM Nazli Sonmez Matt
![Page 2: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
SO…..WHAT DOES FAIR HOUSING HAVE TO DO WITH SMOKE-FREE HOUSING????
![Page 3: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT 1968 was amended to include
Title VIII, Fair Housing Act (FHA)
One week after the assassination
of Martin Luther King, Jr.
![Page 4: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Main purposes of the Act to protect tenant/buyer of a dwelling from being discriminated
by seller/landlord by making it unlawful for a person or entity to:
Refuse or deny to sell or rent a dwelling after a bona-fide offer.
Refuse or deny to negotiate to sell or rent a dwelling after a bona-fide offer.
Refuse or deny to make available of a dwelling after a bona-fide offer.
Discriminate in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling.
![Page 5: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Who is protected?protected classes include:Race, Color,Natural origin,Religion,Gender, Disability, and,Familial status.
![Page 6: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
UNDER FHASMOKERS ARE NOT A PROTECTED CLASS
![Page 7: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
IN FLORIDASMOKERS ARE NOT A PROTECTED CLASS EITHER
![Page 8: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
FLORIDA CLEAN INDOOR AIR ACT
Prohibition.—A person may not smoke in an enclosed indoor workplace, except as otherwise provided in s. 386.2045.
Florida Clean Indoor Air Act was enacted in 1985.
Legislative intent was to protect people from health hazards of second-hand tobacco smoking and to implement a constitutional health initiative.
In November 2002, 71% of Florida residents voted for a constitutional amendment to prohibit smoking in all enclosed indoor workplaces.
The smoke-free law became effective July 1, 2003.
![Page 9: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2011 Amendment to Florida Clean Indoor Air Act
Chapter 2011-108, Laws of Florida amended the Indoor Air Act to clarify that the regulation of smoking is preempted to the STATE and any smoking regulations of municipalities or county ordinances cannot be broader than the state Act
Outdoor smoking on school district property was specifically exempted from the Act.
![Page 10: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Does Florida Clean Indoor Air Act prohibit smoking in residences?Florida Clean Indoor Air Act does
NOT prohibit smoking in private residences.
Smoking is not permitted when the private residence is used commercially for the purpose of:◦Child care◦Adult care◦Health care
![Page 11: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
AGO 2011-15 & OUTDOOR SMOKING
Current AG- Pam Bondi opines that the St. Johns River Water Management District CANNOT adopt a policy to prohibit smoking at outdoor locations by all persons.
HOWEVER, they could regulate outdoor smoking by their employees as a personnel matter.
The State Clean Indoor Air Act preempts municipal or local policies
![Page 12: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
HOW CAN HUD ENCOURAGE SMOKE FREE HOUSING?FEDERAL POLICIES ARE NOT SUBJECT
TO STATE LIMITATIONS
FEDERAL AGENCIES LIKE HUD have authority over public housing
Public Housing Authorities and recipients of HUD funds for housing
BECAUSE Florida Indoor Clean Air Act does not cover private residences HUD policies can.
![Page 13: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
WHAT CAN A LANDLORD OR PROPERTY MANAGER DO?
A landlord or property manager can adopt 100% smoke-free policy.
A landlord or property manager can enforce a smoke-free requirement through the lease agreement.
![Page 14: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
LEGALITIES OF A SMOKE FREE POLICY
Q. is there a right to smoke?
A. no legally protected right to smoke so housing providers can legally create smoke free policies in:common areas, units; any other part of the property that they own or control.
There is a fundamental right of privacy; BUTThe right to privacy does NOT include smoking
![Page 15: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Q. Are smoke free laws discriminatory against people who smoke?
A. No. smokers are not a protected class and smoking is not a protected activity
![Page 16: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CONSEQUENSES FOR PROVIDERS WHO DON’T HAVE SMOKE FREE POLICES
1. Tenants w/ disabilities may have special
rights 2. If their disability is worse by secondhand smoke, they can
request a reasonable accommodation 3. Subjects housing providers to future liabilities
![Page 17: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
DISCLOSUREof smoke-free policies requiredLegally required by some states [CA Civil Code Section 1947.5(b)]Every prospective tenant must be
notified where smoking is and is NOT permitted
The policy Must be in all leasesbe very careful with language translations- if not careful it will translate that people “ARE free to smoke”.
![Page 18: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
RECENT CASES
City of North Miami vs. Kurtz- (Miami) “right to smoke is not included within the penumbra of fundamental rights protected under [the federal constitution’s privacy provisions]”
Merrill v. Bosser- (Broward) defendant liable where amount of smoke gave rise to a disturbance of possession…due to excessive secondhand smoke
![Page 19: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
OTHER STATESIn Re: HUD and Kirk & Guilford Management Corp. and Park Towers Apts. – (IL) conciliation agreement requiring no-smoking policy; violator could be evicted
Gainsborough St. Realty Trust v. Haile-(Mass.)-Landlord suing for non-payment of rent lost. Held: amount of smoke from bar below Haile’s apartment deemed “unfit for smokers & nonsmokers alike”.
McCormick v. Moran-(NY) Held: excessive smoking...caused tobacco smoke residue…creating offensive odor and a potential health risk that may arise to others who may use the premises.”
![Page 20: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
CASES CONTINUEDHeck v. Whitehurst Co.- (Ohio) landlord failed to make repairs to keep apartment in a “fair and habitable condition”. Ordered to make repairs w/n 21 days; abate rent by 50% & pay tenant $639.
Zangrando v. Kuder-(Ohio) Plaintiff asked defendant to move 30 feet away to smoke. Defendant refused and condo association would not get involved. After defendant moved away, plaintiff filed suit and lost.
Harwood Capital Corp. v. Carey (Mass.)- “jury finds heavy smoking to be gounds for eviction.” Landlord breached lease prohibiting tenants from creating a nuisance or engaging in activity that substantially interfered in the rights of other building occupants.
![Page 21: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Poyck v. Bryant, et al (NY) Held: “secondhand smoke is just as insidious and invasive as …noxious odors, smoke odors, chemical fumes, excessive noise and water leaks and extreme dust penetration.”
![Page 22: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
CONCLUSIONSmoking is not a constitutional or legal
rightNo federal, state or local laws prohibit
landlord, housing authority or condominium association from adopting 100% smoke free policies.
Smoke-Free housing policies DO NOT infringe on individual rights
Smokers are NOT a protected classSmoke-Free policies are like any other
lease agreement provision
![Page 23: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SMOKE ! SMOKE FREE HOUSING SEMINAR July 16, 2012](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022052914/5681693b550346895de0a919/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)