theory of cost final
DESCRIPTION
Micro EconomicsTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Cost of production - Aggregate of price paid for the factors used in producing a commodity.
Cost concepts :1.Used for accounting purposes.2.Analytical, used in economic analysis.
![Page 3: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Opportunity cost and Actual cost
Opportunity cost is the income foregone for the current best use of a resource.
Business Costs and full costs – Actual cost
or real cost i.e. all payments and contractual obligations made by the firm and is used for calculating business profits
![Page 4: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Accounting costs are the costs most often associated with the costs of producing.
Economic costs are not only the costs of producing a good, it also includes the opportunities forgone by producing this product.
Example: If a firm is producing Computers then the accounting costs are the costs incurred for producing the computers. Economic costs include the cost of producing the computers as well as opportunity cost. Suppose, If this firm could lease its office and the plant for say $100,000 then that is the oppurtunity cost.
![Page 5: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Explicit and Implicit costs – Explicit is the actual money expenses recorded in the books of accounts.
Cost not appearing in the accouning system are implicit costs. E.g. opportunity costs.
Explicit + Implicit costs = Economic costs
![Page 6: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Total Cost (TC) Total Fixed Cost (TFC) Total Variable cost (TVC) Average Fixed cost (AFC) Average Variable cost (AVC) Average total cost (ATC) Marginal cost (MC)
![Page 7: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Fixed and variable costs Total, Average and marginal costs. Short run and long run costs Incremental and sunk costs Historical and replacement costs Private and social costs
![Page 8: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Total fixed cost is the cost associated with the fixed input.
EXAMPLE:- charges such as contractual rent , insurance fee , maintenance cost , property tax, interest on the borrowed funds etc.
![Page 9: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
$
Quantity
TFC
![Page 10: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
AFC = TFC/Q
AFC is the fixed cost per unit of output.
As output increases , the total fixed cost spreads over more & more units & therefore avg. fixed cost becomes less & less.
![Page 11: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
$
Quantity
AFC
![Page 12: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Total variable cost is the cost associated with the variable input.
EXAMPLE: it includes payment to labour employed , the prices of the raw material , fuel & power used etc.
![Page 13: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
It is often drawn like a flipped over S, first getting flatter & flatter, & then steeper & steeper.This shape reflects the increasing & then decreasing marginal returns we discussed in the section on production.
$
Quantity
TVC
![Page 14: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
AVC = TVC/Q
AVC is the variable cost per unit of output.
![Page 15: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Suppose X is the amount of variable input & PX is its price.
Then, AVC = TVC/Q = (PXX)/Q
= PX(X/Q)
= PX [1/(Q/X)]
= PX [1/AP].
So since AP had an inverted U-shape, AVC must have a U-shape.
![Page 16: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
$
Quantity
AVC
![Page 17: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Quantity
TC = TFC + TVC
The TC curve looks like the TVC curve, but it is shifted up, by the amount of TFC.
$TC
TFC
![Page 18: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
$
Quantity
ATC
Like AVC, ATC is U-shaped, but it reaches its minimum after AVC reaches its minimum.
This is because ATC = AVC +AFC & AFC continues to fall & pulls down ATC.
AVC
![Page 19: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Marginal Cost (MC)
Marginal cost measures the additional cost of inputs required to produce each successive unit of output
MC = ΔTC/ ΔQ Alternatively, MC = dTC/dQ .MC is the first derivative of the TC
curve or the slope of the TC curve.
![Page 20: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Suppose the firm takes the prices of inputs as given.
Then,MC = TC/Q
= PX X/ Q
= PX [1/(Q/X)]
= PX [1/MP].
So since MP had an inverted U-shape, MC must have a U-shape.
![Page 21: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
$
Quantity
MC
![Page 22: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
$
Quantity
MC ATC
AVC
![Page 23: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Assumptions : Labour (variable) and capital (fixed) are two
factor inputs. Price of labor : Rs.10/unit Price of capital : Rs.25/unit
![Page 24: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Units of capital
Units of labour
TP TFC TVC TC
4 0 0 100 0 100
4 1 2 100 10 110
4 2 5 100 20 120
4 3 10 100 30 130
4 4 15 100 40 140
4 5 18 100 50 150
4 6 20 100 60 160
4 7 21 100 70 170
![Page 25: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
FC remains constant at all levels of output TVC varies with output TVC does not change in the same
proportion TC varies in the same proportion as the
TVC.
![Page 26: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
The graph above is also a result of linear cost function i.e.
TC = a + bQa = TFC, Q = quantity produced, TC = total
costb = change in TVC due to change in QAC= a/Q + bMC = bAVC = b
![Page 28: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Q TFC TVC TC AFC AVC ATC MC
0 100 0 100 - - -
1 100 25 125 100 25 125 25
2 100 40 140 50 20 70 15
3 100 50 150 33.3 16.6 50 10
4 100 60 160 25 15 40 10
5 100 80 180 20 16 36 20
6 100 110 210 16.3 18.3 35 30
7 100 150 250 14.2 21.4 35.7 40
8 100 300 400 12.5 37.5 50 150
9 100 500 600 11.1 55.6 66.7 200
10 100 900 1000 10 90 100 400
![Page 29: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
AFC decreases as the output increases. AVC first decreases and then increases as
the output increases. ATC first decreases , remains constant and
then increases as the output increases. MC first decreases and then increases as
the output increases. When the average cost is minimum, MC=AC
![Page 30: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
AVC is U shaped indicating its three phases i) Decreasing ii) Constant iii) increasing.
Corresponds to the law of variable proportions.
ATC : vertical summation of AFC and AVC curves.
It is U shaped indicating that if the output is increased, initially the average cost decreases, remains constant and then starts rising .
![Page 32: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
ATC = AFC + AVC ATC falls in the beginning since AFC and
AVC both decrease. At a certain point, even though AVC starts
rising, ATC continues to fall because of predominance of falling AFC curve over the rising AVC curve.
With further expansion of output, AVC takes over AFC and hence ATC starts rising.
![Page 33: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The point at which the rise of AVC nullifies the falling AFC, ATC is constant.
The distance between ATC and AVC narrows down as the curve moves up.
Economic reason – Fixed cost is important for a firm till the normal capacity is exhausted. Beyond that, more and more variable inputs are added to increase output .
![Page 34: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
There is also a relationship between marginal costs and average total costs.
◦ Average total cost is equal to total cost divided by the number of units produced.
◦ Marginal cost is the change in total cost due to a one-unit change in the production rate.
![Page 35: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
When marginal costs are less than average variable costs, the latter must fall.
When marginal costs are greater than average variable costs, the latter must rise.
![Page 36: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
When AC is minimum, MC is equal to AC .
At this point , MC cuts AC from below.
This is the optimization point of cost to output in the short run .
![Page 37: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Question
◦ What do you think—is there a predictable relationship between the production function and AVC, ATC, and MC?
![Page 38: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
Answer
◦ As long as marginal physical product rises, marginal cost will fall, and when marginal physical product starts to fall (after reaching the point of diminishing marginal product), marginal cost will begin to rise.
![Page 39: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Firms’ short-run cost curves are a reflection of the law of diminishing marginal product.
Given any constant price of the variable input, marginal costs decline as long as the marginal product of the variable resource is rising.
![Page 40: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
At the point at which diminishing marginal product begins, marginal costs begin to rise as the marginal product of the variable input begins to decline.
![Page 41: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
If the wage rate is constant, then the labor cost associated with each additional unit of output will decline as long as the marginal physical product of labor increases.
![Page 42: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
/ / /
![Page 43: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
![Page 44: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
![Page 45: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
![Page 46: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
![Page 47: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Lon
g R
un
Tota
l C
ost
LTC
LTC
QTotal Product
All inputs are variable in the long run. There are no fixed costs.
LONG-RUN TOTAL COST CURVE
![Page 48: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
The LAC curve is an envelop curve of all possible plant sizes. Also known as “planning curve”
It traces the lowest average cost of producing each level of output.
It is U-shaped because of ◦ Economies of Scale◦ Diseconomies of Scale
![Page 49: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
LAC
SAC1
Q0
COST
SAC2
LONG-RUN AVERAGE COST CURVE
![Page 50: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
LAC
Q0
COST
SAC1
q0
![Page 51: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
LAC
Q0
COST
SAC1
q0
SAC2
Building a larger sized plant (size 2) will result in a lower average cost of producing q0
![Page 52: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
LAC
Q0
COST
SAC1
q0
SAC2
Likewise, a larger sized plant (size 3) will result to a lower average cost of producing q1
q1
SAC3
![Page 53: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Envelope curve
• LRAC can never cut SRAC but it will be tangential to each SRAC at some point.
• Average cost can not be higher in the long run than in the short run;
•Explanation;1.Any adjustment which will reduce costs
possible to be made in the short run must also be possible in the long run
2.It is not always possible in the short run to produce a given output in the cheapest possible way as all the factors are not variable.
![Page 54: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
properties U-shaped curve.Based on assumption of unchanging technology.LRAC is flatter curve than the SRAC. In economics ,we define long period as that during which size of the organization can be altered to meet changed conditions.Normally; Output increases and average costs also increases But in long run, size of the firm Can be increased therefore Variable costs are likely to rise less sharply. Hence a flatter curve.
Long run average cost curve Minimum
efficient scale is the lowest output level for which LRAC is minimized
![Page 55: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
LAC
SAC1
Q0
COST
SAC2
LONG-RUN AVERAGE COST CURVE
Q1
Economies of Scale
Diseconomies of Scale
![Page 56: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
LAC
SAC1
Q0
COST
LONG-RUN AVERAGE and MARGINAL COST CURVES
Q1
LMC
SMC1
SMC2
SAC2
![Page 57: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Long-run Average Cost (LAC) curve ◦ is U-shaped. ◦ the envelope of all the short-run average
cost curves; ◦ driven by economies and diseconomies of
size. Long-run Marginal Cost (LMC) curve
◦ Also U-shaped; ◦ intersects LAC at LAC’s minimum point.
![Page 58: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
MC = ΔTC/ΔQor MC = dTC/dQ
![Page 59: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
MC < ATC when ATC is decreasing,
MC > ATC when ATC is increasing, &
MC = ATC when ATC is at its minimum.
![Page 60: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
long run MC & short run marginal cost will be equal at that output.
That is, the LR MC & SR MC will intersect at that output.
![Page 61: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
The condition for optimisation is the same as Short run curve.
LAC= LMC= SAC= SMC LAC and SAC are at their minimum.
![Page 62: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
![Page 63: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
![Page 64: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
In the long run, all inputs are variable.◦ What makes up LRAC?
![Page 65: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Labor Specialization: Jobs can be subdivided and workers performing very specialized tasks can become very efficient at their jobs.
Managerial Specialization: Management can also specialize in a larger firm (in areas such as marketing, personnel, or finance).
Equipment that is technologically efficient but only effectively utilized with a large volume of production can be used.
![Page 66: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
The Long-Run Cost Function
• Reasons for Economies of Scale…Increasing returns to scaleSpecialization in the use of labor and
capital• Economies in maintaining inventory• Discounts from bulk purchases• Lower cost of raising capital funds• Spreading promotional and R&D costs
Management efficiencies
![Page 67: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF LARGE SCALE PRODUCTION
Specialization
Economy of labour
Economics of buying and
selling
Overhead charges
Rent
![Page 68: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
ECONOMIES OF SCALE
INTERNAL ECONOMIES
EXTERNAL ECONOMIES
Reduction in costs when the scale of production increases
is called
![Page 69: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
INTERNAL ECONOMIES
Economies in Production
Economies in
Marketing
Technological Advantages
Advantages of divisions of labour & Specialization
Large scale production provides opportunities for technological advances
Large scale production workers of varying skills & qualifications are employed which facilitates division of labour as per specialization
.. Large scale selling of firms own products
.. Advertising cost .. Large scale distribution
.. Large scale purchase of raw materials & other inputs
Improves the overall performance of the firm
![Page 70: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Managerial Economies
Transport & Storage Economies
.. Specialization in managerial activities
.. Mechanization of managerial functions
.. Improves managerial efficiency
.. Efficient management of the transport function
.. Proper utilization of storage facilities
.. Helps in reducing transportation and storage costs
![Page 71: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
CAUSES OF INTERNAL ECONOMIES
SIZE Big Machine
Bigger capacity lower Energy less labour
LIMITING PROCESS
MergersSpreading of
costs
TECHNIQUE
Superior Technique
Shorter period of time
SPECIALI - ZATION
Division of Labour
Increase in efficiency
![Page 72: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
COMMERCIAL ECONOMIES
Aggregation
Financial economies
Wide Market
Credit facilities
Encourages investment
Managerial economies
RISK BEARING ECONOMIES Spreading
RisksDiversification
![Page 73: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
CAUSES OF EXTERNAL ECONOMIES
CONCENTRATION
Advantages of locality
Common Pool of Knowledge of localityReduced transportation cost
INFORMATION
DISINTEGRATION
Breaking up processes
The benefits which companies derive from trade publications and technical journalsBy virtue of location, common pool of research can be created and benefits can be shared
Knowledge sharing
Breaking up of processes which can be handled by specialist firms
![Page 74: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Expansion of the management hierarchy leads to problems of communication, coordination, and bureaucratic red tape, and the possibility that decisions will fail to mesh. (“The left hand doesn’t seem to know what the right hand is doing.”) The result is reduced efficiency.
In large facilities, workers may feel alienated and may shirk (not work as much as they should). Then additional supervision may be required and that adds to costs.
![Page 75: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
The Long-Run Cost Function
• Reasons for Diseconomies of Scale…Decreasing returns to scaleInput market imperfections e.g. wage rate driven upManagement coordination and controlproblemsDisproportionate rise in transportation costsDisproportionate rise in staff and indirect labour
![Page 76: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
In the long run, a firm exercises its choicewith regard to the size of the plant andscale of production, on the basis of long runaverage cost. Selection of the optimal plant size accordingto the expected demand. Avoid unnecessary costs due to
inappropriateplant size.
![Page 77: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
The reasons for the LAC curve being L shaped are as follows :
Technological progress :In economics theory,technological is assumed to be constant.But technology changes in real life.Due to this,the average cost decline and does not rise
![Page 78: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Learning by doing :The LAC curve completely slopes completely downwards due to learning by doing.Since the efficiency of firm increases due to continuous work,it is able to reduce cost.As the output is increased,there is not only the increase in knowledge of many things,there is also an improvement in the management of plant.Due to this LAC curve is L shaped
![Page 79: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Management technique :According to the modern management theory,appropriate administrative structure is available to operate the plant of each size.There exists appropriate management technique in different levels of management.The management technique is available in large and small size.The cost of different management first fall up to certain plant size.The managerial cost slowly increases to very large level of output.
![Page 80: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
![Page 81: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Break even point (BEP) is located at that level of output or sales at which net income or profit is zero.
BEP is located at that level of output at which the price or AR is equal to AC.
Contribution margin = Price – AVC Formula for calculating BEP=TFC/ P- AVC where P- AVC
![Page 82: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
BEP in terms of sales value BEP = FC/ Contribution ratioContribution ratio = TR-TVC/ TR BEA can be used for determining ‘safety
margin’ regarding the extent to which the firm can permit a decline in sales without causing losses.
Safety Margin = Sales- BEQ/ Sales *100
![Page 83: Theory of cost final](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081413/546653f8af7959c1628b4fd9/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
BEA can be useful in determining the target profit sales volume.
Target profit sales vol = TFC- Target profit / Contri. Margin