theme 2 – public sector and mixed economy public economics 1

23
Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Upload: leslie-gaines

Post on 13-Jan-2016

234 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy

Public Economics

1

Page 2: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Public Sector and the Economy

2

Page 3: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

3

Page 4: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

The Size of Government

• How to measure the size of government– Number of workers– Annual expenditures

• Types of government expenditure– Purchases of goods and services– Transfers of income– Interest payments

• Budget documents– Unified budget– Regulatory budget

4

Page 5: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

5

Page 6: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

6

Page 7: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

7

Government spending, % of GDP

1870 1913 1920 1937 1960 1980 1990 1996  

Austria - - 14.7 15.2 35.7 48.1 48.6 51.7  

Belgium - - - 21.8 30.3 58.6 54.8 54.3  

Canada - - 13.3 18.6 28.6 38.8 46.0 44.7  

France 12.6 17.0 27.6 29.0 34.6 46.1 49.8 54.5  

Germany 10.0 14.8 25.0 42.4 32.4 47.9 45.1 49.0  

Italy 11.9 11.1 22.5 24.5 30.1 41.9 53.2 52.9  

Japan 8.8 8.3 14.8 25.4 17.5 32.0 31.7 36.2  

Netherlands 9.1 9.0 13.5 19.0 33.7 55.2 54.0 49.9  

Norway 3.7 8.3 13.7 - 29.9 37.5 53.8 45.5  

Spain - 8.3 9.3 18.4 18.8 32.2 42.0 43.3  

Sweden 5.7 6.3 8.1 10.4 31.0 60.1 59.1 64.7  

Switzerland - 2.7 4.6 6.1 17.2 32.8 33.5 37.6  

Britain 9.4 12.7 26.2 30.0 32.2 43.0 39.9 41.9  

United States 3.9 1.8 7.0 8.6 27.0 31.8 33.3 33.3  

AVERAGE 8.3 9.1 15.4 18.3* 28.5 43.3 46.1 47.1  

Australia - - - - 21.2 31.6 34.7 36.6  

Ireland - - - - 28.0 48.9 41.2 37.6  

New Zealand - - - - 26.9 38.1 41.3 47.1  

AVERAGE - - - - 25.4 39.5 39.1 40.4  

TOTAL AVERAGE 8.3 9.1 15.4 20.7 27.9 42.6 44.8 45.9  

Source: IMF *Average without Germany, Japan and Spain undergoing war or war preparations at his time  

Page 8: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

8

Page 9: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

9

Page 10: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

10

Page 11: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

11

Page 12: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

12

The future The future of the of the state...state...

Page 13: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Reasons for government growth

• Macro models

– Wagner and the stages of development

– Peacock and Wiseman’s displacement effect

• Micro models

– Baumol’s unbalanced productivity growth

– Brown and Jackson’s microeconomic model

– Role of politicians, bureaucrats and interest groups.

13

Page 14: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

14

Depends on chosen economic system…

What are the Legitimate Economic Functions of a Government?

Least

individual

freedom

Most

individual

freedom

• Centrally Planned Socialism: Government owns all resources and makes all important economic decisions

• Decentralized Capitalist Economy: Limited government; individuals and firms make all important economic decisions

Page 15: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

15

1. Public expenditure theory

– What government expenditures do we expect, and why?

– How should government carry out its desired functions?

2. Theory of taxation

– What principles should guide design of government tax policy

3. Theory of fiscal federalism

Three Normative Aspects of Public Sector Economics

Page 16: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

16

• Efficiency is mainly a positive concept• Economists measure efficiency as Pareto Optimality

• Definition: An economy-wide allocation of resources is efficient if in order to increase one person’s utility at least one other person’s utility must be decreased

Example

• An allocation in which I have everything and you have nothing is an ‘efficient’ allocation (Pareto Optimal)

– The only way to make you better off is to take some away from me

Two Goals of Economies1: EFFICIENCY

Page 17: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

17

Consider all ‘efficient’ points given our existing resources• Called the Utility Possibility Frontier

(Efficiency continued…)

1. Must be downward sloping• To increase 1’s utility we must

take utility away from 2

2. Points below line are attainable but not efficient

• Could give some to both 1 and 2 and make them both better off (Pareto Superior moves)

3. Points beyond line are unattainable• Would require giving more

utility to both 1 and 2 which is impossible

Page 18: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

18

Equity is mainly a normative concept

End-results equity

• Asks whether outcomes are fair.

– For example: Is it fair that over half of income in the country goes to 20% of households? If not, what should be done to correct it?

Process equity

• Asks whether rules determining process are fair, regardless of allocation.

– For example: Do children of wealthy families start with an advantage due to their family’s wealth? If so, then what should be done to level the playing field?

2: EQUITY (FAIRNESS)

Page 19: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Allocative function

– Market failures distort the allocation of resources in the economy

– Incomplete markets

• Characteristics of goods and services prevent efficient supply

• Existence of externalities.

19

Page 20: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Distributive function

– Fairness

– Inequality in income distribution

– Criteria for evaluation.

20

Page 21: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Stabilisation function– Macro-economic objectives

– 3 premises of stabilisation (Keynes):

• The market economy is inherently unstable

• Macroeconomic instability is a form of market failure that is highly costly to an economy

• Governments are able to stabilise the economy by means of appropriate macroeconomic policies.

– New Classical Macroeconomics

– Neo-Keynesian theory.

21

Page 22: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Direct versus indirect government intervention

•Direct government intervention refers to the actual participation of government in the economy.

•Indirect government intervention to the regulatory function of government.

22

Page 23: Theme 2 – Public Sector and Mixed Economy Public Economics 1

Direct versus indirect government intervention

Direct intervention– Actual participation in the

economy

– Tax individuals and companies

– Borrow on financial markets

– Execute budgeted spending

– Examples:• National defence

• Electricity

• Infrastructure

• Provision of school text books

Indirect intervention– Regulatory function

– Enacting law or proclaiming legally binding rule

– Indirect taxes and subsidies

– Examples:• Labour laws

• Anti-tobacco laws

23