the voluntary harmonisation procedure for the approval of

24
8th Annual Symposium of the European LeukemiaNet / 12th Annual Symposium of the German Competence Network "Acute and chronic Leukemias", February 1-2, Topic: European Clinical Trials Directive: Suggestions for modification and practical approaches Multinational Clinical trials in Europe and the Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) Hartmut Krafft, PhD Co-Chair CTFG Head, Clinical Trial Unit Paul-Ehrlich Institute Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 55-59 63225 Langen Germany Fax: +49 +(0)6103 771277 Telephone: +49 +(0)6103 771811 E-Mail: [email protected] http://www.pei.de

Upload: others

Post on 08-Apr-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 1

8th Annual Symposium of the European LeukemiaNet / 12th Annual Symposium of the German Competence Network "Acute and chronic Leukemias", February 1-2,

Topic: European Clinical Trials Directive: Suggestions for modification andpractical approaches

Multinational Clinical trials in Europe and the Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP)

Hartmut Krafft, PhDCo-Chair CTFG

Head, Clinical Trial UnitPaul-Ehrlich Institute

Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 55-5963225 Langen

Germany

Fax: +49 +(0)6103 771277Telephone: +49 +(0)6103 771811

E-Mail: [email protected]://www.pei.de

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 2H. Krafft Page 2H. Krafft Page 2

15 different national approaches of the Member States

Differences between approval and notification systems

Completely different documentation

Different timelines

Languages

…………

…………

Situation of clinical trials in Europe before the implementation of the Clinical Trials Directive

in 2004

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 3H. Krafft Page 3

Situation of clinical trials in Europe before CTD

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 4H. Krafft Page 4H. Krafft Page 4

15/27 Member States working with the same english versions of documents like

- Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier (IMPD)

- Protocol

- Investigators Brochure

- SmPCs

but

Situation of clinical trials after the implementation of the Clinical Trials Directive

in 2004

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 5H. Krafft Page 5H. Krafft Page 5

not harmonised are

- Assessments

- Treatment options and standards

- Some documents related to the clinical trial applications due to different interpretations of guidance documents

- Application times at the national Competent Authorities

Situation of clinical trials after the implementation of the Clinical Trials Directive

in 2004

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 6

Erleichterungen für zugelassene Arzneimittel / bereits

genehmigte Anträge auf klinische Prüfung gibt es schon seit Einführung der GCP-V in

Deutschland

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 7H. Krafft Page 7H. Krafft Page 7

The

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure

offers a solution to address

these points within the existing European legal framework

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 8

76,0

6,22

4,01

2,93

2,27

2,00

1,57

1,18

0,88

0,69

0,53

0,46

0,36

0,25

0,22

0,08

0,10

0,09

0,03

0,04

0,01

0,02

0,02

0,01

0

20

40

60

80

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Member States per clinical trial

Perc

en

t o

f clin

ical tr

ials

Distribution of Clinical Trials in Europein one Member State vs multinational in percent

Status 19.5.2010

Approx. 25000 Clinical Trial Applications

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 9H. Krafft Page 9

++

+

+

-

++

+

+

+ -

TimeCompetent Authorities Ethics Committees

Result of Clinical Trial Application

0

30

60

90

120

+

nat.approval

Present situation for the approval of a multinational Clinical Trial

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 10H. Krafft Page 10H. Krafft Page 10

The HMAs Clinical Trials Facilitation Group (CTFG)voluntary harmonisation procedure(VHP)

http://www.hma.eu/77.html

Contact and submissions:

[email protected]

or Tel.:+ 49 6103 771811

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 11H. Krafft Page 11

Ideal situation of clinical trials in Europe after VHP?

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 12H. Krafft Page 12

Key features of the Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure

Only electronic documents sent to one address (one stop shop)

Only general documents required, which are part of any clinical trial application (Protocol, Investigators brochure, Investigational Med. Product Dossier)

Reliable timelines for Sponsor and Member States

Harmonised scientific discussion resulting in harmonised applications in the Member States - no tracking of Member States specific modifications

necessary

- consolidated lists of grounds for non-acceptance, if needed

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 13H. Krafft Page 13

Max.

5 Days

The VHP consists of three phases

VHP-Phase 1:Request for a VHP at any time

- Request by sponsors including the identification of the participating NCAs and submission of a full dossier

- Decision by Member States to participate in the VHP

VHP-Phase 2: the assessment phase

- Review of the CTA by all the participating NCAs

- 1st common position around D30, total period maximum 60 days

- Administrative co-ordination by the VHP coordinator

VHP-Phase 3: the national Member States step

- Formal CTA applications to NCAs.

- CTA approval by NCAs within short timelines (after positive VHP)

Max. 60 Days

10 Days

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 14H. Krafft Page 14H. Krafft Page 14

Summary of VHP-Substantial Amendments (VHP-SA)

Offered for successful VHPs after national approval of the initial Clinical Trial Applications

One-stop-shop for submission

VHP-SA accepts electronic submissions only

Approval after 20 days, if none of participating Member State raises internally GNAs

Approval after 35 days, if GNAs are resolved after the final internal discussion

Rejection after 35 days giving reasons for GNA to the applicant

Resubmission after rejection in shorter time lines possible

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 15

VHP with ATMPs and GMOs

Points under Discussion within the Clinical Trials Facilitation Group

- General acceptance of VHPs with ATMPs

- Standard timelines for ATMPs

- Problems with GMO:

- Additional national requirements e.g release certificates for the Release of GMO / external boards

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 16H. Krafft Page 16

Experience with VHP

http://www.bfarm.de/cln_103/EN/drugs/1_befAuth/clinTrials/meetings/meetings-node-en.html

International CTFG Workshop on the Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) for the Assessment of Multinational Clinical Trial Applications, 30 April 2010, Bonn

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011

Distribution of Sponsors of VHPs

H. Krafft Page 17

Sponsor No. of VHP CountryActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd 5 SWITZERLANDAgence nationale de recherche sur le sida et les hépatites viraleshépatites virales (ANRS

1 FRANCE

Amgen Inc 3 United States of AmericaARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1 United States of AmericaBaxter Innovations GmbH 2 AUSTRIAbioprojet 2 FRANCEBristol-Myers Squibb International Corporation 1 BELGIUMCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 1 UNITED KINGDOMCentocor BV 1 NETHERLANDSCephalon, Inc. 2 USADr. Falk Pharma GmbH 1 GERMANYEORTC 4 BELGIUMExcited States, LLC 1 United States of AmericaF.Hoffmann-La Roche 2 SWITZERLANDFresenius Biotech GmbH 1 GERMANYGilead Sciences International Ltd 1 UNITED KINGDOMGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals 9 BELGIUMHANNOVER CLlNICAL TRIAL CENTER GMBH 1 GERMANYInnovacell Biotechnologie AG 1 AUSTRIAMerck & Co., Inc. 1 United States of AmericaMerck KGaA 1 GERMANYMerck Serono 2 GERMANYMolMed S.p.a 1 ITALYMorphotek Inc. 1 United States of AmericaMovetis NV 1 BELGIUMNycomed GmbH 1 GERMANYOrfagen 1 FRANCEShire-Movetis NV 2 BELGIUMUniversity of Birmingham 1 UNITED KINGDOMWyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc 1 United States of America

Status 17.1.2011

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 18H. Krafft Page 18

Participating Member States in 52 VHPs

Country rejects joining VHP

Poland

The following MS weren‘t yet selected for a VHP:

EstoniaMaltaCyprusLuxemburgSloveniaLithuania

Country Number of VHP

GERMANY 39

FRANCE 32

SPAIN 29

BELGIUM 19

UNITED KINGDOM 19

NETHERLANDS 16

HUNGARY 15

CZECH REPUBLIC 13

SWEDEN 12

AUSTRIA 12

PORTUGAL 7

DENMARK 7

ROMANIA 6

GREECE 5

FINLAND 4

IRELAND 3

ITALY 2

BULGARIA 2

NORWAY 2

LATVIA 1

ICELAND 1

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 19H. Krafft Page 19

VHP numbers (March 2009 - 31. Jan. 2011)

55 applications - 44 standard VHP

- 11 accelerated VHP (Pandemic Influenza Vaccines)

43 finished positive - 1 negative (GNA not addressed)

- 3 withdrawals (before dossier subm.)

- 8 ongoing

Leading MS: UK;FR;DE;CZ;DK;ES

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 20H. Krafft Page 20

Summary results of the standard VHP Average time used for a VHP: 51 days (SD 8,3 days)

(Min. 29 days; Max. 68 days)mean 2009: 52 days; mean 2010: 47 days

Mean of 7 Member States per standard VHP- Range 2-18 Member States

Time until national CTA by applicant: mean ~30d- Range 1-139 days

Time for national approval by NCAs: mean ~19d- Range 0-101 days

Commercial applicants 85%, Non-commercial applicants 15%

Biologicals 43% Chemicals 57%

Status 10.11.2010

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 21

VHP without lMS VHP with lMS

GNA with/out a leading MS in the same VHP

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 22

244

189

142

643

174

224

345

176 172

393

328 328

190

265

460426

177

560

734

119

240

358

9372

782

0

250

500

750

1000

VH

P w

ith 1

8 M

SV

HP

mean

Comparison of approval times of 23 multinational clinical trials with 18 Member States vs VHP

from the first application date to the last approval date by the national Competent Authorities

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 23H. Krafft Page 23H. Krafft Page 23

Conclusions on VHP

The Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure is an efficient tool to achieve harmonised and quick approvals of clinical trials in many Member States of the EU in one procedure

VHP offers a one-stop-shop for CTAs

VHP accepts electronic submissions only

Time lines for applicants and Competent Authorities are reliable and are met

Substantial Amendments are now included in the VHP

Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 24

Thank you for your attentionand I„m ready for discussion