the voluntary harmonisation procedure for the approval of
TRANSCRIPT
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 1
8th Annual Symposium of the European LeukemiaNet / 12th Annual Symposium of the German Competence Network "Acute and chronic Leukemias", February 1-2,
Topic: European Clinical Trials Directive: Suggestions for modification andpractical approaches
Multinational Clinical trials in Europe and the Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP)
Hartmut Krafft, PhDCo-Chair CTFG
Head, Clinical Trial UnitPaul-Ehrlich Institute
Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 55-5963225 Langen
Germany
Fax: +49 +(0)6103 771277Telephone: +49 +(0)6103 771811
E-Mail: [email protected]://www.pei.de
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 2H. Krafft Page 2H. Krafft Page 2
15 different national approaches of the Member States
Differences between approval and notification systems
Completely different documentation
Different timelines
Languages
…………
…………
Situation of clinical trials in Europe before the implementation of the Clinical Trials Directive
in 2004
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 3H. Krafft Page 3
Situation of clinical trials in Europe before CTD
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 4H. Krafft Page 4H. Krafft Page 4
15/27 Member States working with the same english versions of documents like
- Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier (IMPD)
- Protocol
- Investigators Brochure
- SmPCs
but
Situation of clinical trials after the implementation of the Clinical Trials Directive
in 2004
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 5H. Krafft Page 5H. Krafft Page 5
not harmonised are
- Assessments
- Treatment options and standards
- Some documents related to the clinical trial applications due to different interpretations of guidance documents
- Application times at the national Competent Authorities
Situation of clinical trials after the implementation of the Clinical Trials Directive
in 2004
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 6
Erleichterungen für zugelassene Arzneimittel / bereits
genehmigte Anträge auf klinische Prüfung gibt es schon seit Einführung der GCP-V in
Deutschland
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 7H. Krafft Page 7H. Krafft Page 7
The
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure
offers a solution to address
these points within the existing European legal framework
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 8
76,0
6,22
4,01
2,93
2,27
2,00
1,57
1,18
0,88
0,69
0,53
0,46
0,36
0,25
0,22
0,08
0,10
0,09
0,03
0,04
0,01
0,02
0,02
0,01
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Member States per clinical trial
Perc
en
t o
f clin
ical tr
ials
Distribution of Clinical Trials in Europein one Member State vs multinational in percent
Status 19.5.2010
Approx. 25000 Clinical Trial Applications
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 9H. Krafft Page 9
++
+
+
-
++
+
+
+ -
TimeCompetent Authorities Ethics Committees
Result of Clinical Trial Application
0
30
60
90
120
+
nat.approval
Present situation for the approval of a multinational Clinical Trial
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 10H. Krafft Page 10H. Krafft Page 10
The HMAs Clinical Trials Facilitation Group (CTFG)voluntary harmonisation procedure(VHP)
http://www.hma.eu/77.html
Contact and submissions:
or Tel.:+ 49 6103 771811
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 11H. Krafft Page 11
Ideal situation of clinical trials in Europe after VHP?
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 12H. Krafft Page 12
Key features of the Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure
Only electronic documents sent to one address (one stop shop)
Only general documents required, which are part of any clinical trial application (Protocol, Investigators brochure, Investigational Med. Product Dossier)
Reliable timelines for Sponsor and Member States
Harmonised scientific discussion resulting in harmonised applications in the Member States - no tracking of Member States specific modifications
necessary
- consolidated lists of grounds for non-acceptance, if needed
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 13H. Krafft Page 13
Max.
5 Days
The VHP consists of three phases
VHP-Phase 1:Request for a VHP at any time
- Request by sponsors including the identification of the participating NCAs and submission of a full dossier
- Decision by Member States to participate in the VHP
VHP-Phase 2: the assessment phase
- Review of the CTA by all the participating NCAs
- 1st common position around D30, total period maximum 60 days
- Administrative co-ordination by the VHP coordinator
VHP-Phase 3: the national Member States step
- Formal CTA applications to NCAs.
- CTA approval by NCAs within short timelines (after positive VHP)
Max. 60 Days
10 Days
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 14H. Krafft Page 14H. Krafft Page 14
Summary of VHP-Substantial Amendments (VHP-SA)
Offered for successful VHPs after national approval of the initial Clinical Trial Applications
One-stop-shop for submission
VHP-SA accepts electronic submissions only
Approval after 20 days, if none of participating Member State raises internally GNAs
Approval after 35 days, if GNAs are resolved after the final internal discussion
Rejection after 35 days giving reasons for GNA to the applicant
Resubmission after rejection in shorter time lines possible
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 15
VHP with ATMPs and GMOs
Points under Discussion within the Clinical Trials Facilitation Group
- General acceptance of VHPs with ATMPs
- Standard timelines for ATMPs
- Problems with GMO:
- Additional national requirements e.g release certificates for the Release of GMO / external boards
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 16H. Krafft Page 16
Experience with VHP
http://www.bfarm.de/cln_103/EN/drugs/1_befAuth/clinTrials/meetings/meetings-node-en.html
International CTFG Workshop on the Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure (VHP) for the Assessment of Multinational Clinical Trial Applications, 30 April 2010, Bonn
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011
Distribution of Sponsors of VHPs
H. Krafft Page 17
Sponsor No. of VHP CountryActelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd 5 SWITZERLANDAgence nationale de recherche sur le sida et les hépatites viraleshépatites virales (ANRS
1 FRANCE
Amgen Inc 3 United States of AmericaARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1 United States of AmericaBaxter Innovations GmbH 2 AUSTRIAbioprojet 2 FRANCEBristol-Myers Squibb International Corporation 1 BELGIUMCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 1 UNITED KINGDOMCentocor BV 1 NETHERLANDSCephalon, Inc. 2 USADr. Falk Pharma GmbH 1 GERMANYEORTC 4 BELGIUMExcited States, LLC 1 United States of AmericaF.Hoffmann-La Roche 2 SWITZERLANDFresenius Biotech GmbH 1 GERMANYGilead Sciences International Ltd 1 UNITED KINGDOMGlaxoSmithKline Biologicals 9 BELGIUMHANNOVER CLlNICAL TRIAL CENTER GMBH 1 GERMANYInnovacell Biotechnologie AG 1 AUSTRIAMerck & Co., Inc. 1 United States of AmericaMerck KGaA 1 GERMANYMerck Serono 2 GERMANYMolMed S.p.a 1 ITALYMorphotek Inc. 1 United States of AmericaMovetis NV 1 BELGIUMNycomed GmbH 1 GERMANYOrfagen 1 FRANCEShire-Movetis NV 2 BELGIUMUniversity of Birmingham 1 UNITED KINGDOMWyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc 1 United States of America
Status 17.1.2011
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 18H. Krafft Page 18
Participating Member States in 52 VHPs
Country rejects joining VHP
Poland
The following MS weren‘t yet selected for a VHP:
EstoniaMaltaCyprusLuxemburgSloveniaLithuania
Country Number of VHP
GERMANY 39
FRANCE 32
SPAIN 29
BELGIUM 19
UNITED KINGDOM 19
NETHERLANDS 16
HUNGARY 15
CZECH REPUBLIC 13
SWEDEN 12
AUSTRIA 12
PORTUGAL 7
DENMARK 7
ROMANIA 6
GREECE 5
FINLAND 4
IRELAND 3
ITALY 2
BULGARIA 2
NORWAY 2
LATVIA 1
ICELAND 1
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 19H. Krafft Page 19
VHP numbers (March 2009 - 31. Jan. 2011)
55 applications - 44 standard VHP
- 11 accelerated VHP (Pandemic Influenza Vaccines)
43 finished positive - 1 negative (GNA not addressed)
- 3 withdrawals (before dossier subm.)
- 8 ongoing
Leading MS: UK;FR;DE;CZ;DK;ES
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 20H. Krafft Page 20
Summary results of the standard VHP Average time used for a VHP: 51 days (SD 8,3 days)
(Min. 29 days; Max. 68 days)mean 2009: 52 days; mean 2010: 47 days
Mean of 7 Member States per standard VHP- Range 2-18 Member States
Time until national CTA by applicant: mean ~30d- Range 1-139 days
Time for national approval by NCAs: mean ~19d- Range 0-101 days
Commercial applicants 85%, Non-commercial applicants 15%
Biologicals 43% Chemicals 57%
Status 10.11.2010
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 21
VHP without lMS VHP with lMS
GNA with/out a leading MS in the same VHP
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 22
244
189
142
643
174
224
345
176 172
393
328 328
190
265
460426
177
560
734
119
240
358
9372
782
0
250
500
750
1000
VH
P w
ith 1
8 M
SV
HP
mean
Comparison of approval times of 23 multinational clinical trials with 18 Member States vs VHP
from the first application date to the last approval date by the national Competent Authorities
Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure; Mannheim; 1.2.2011 H. Krafft Page 23H. Krafft Page 23H. Krafft Page 23
Conclusions on VHP
The Voluntary Harmonisation Procedure is an efficient tool to achieve harmonised and quick approvals of clinical trials in many Member States of the EU in one procedure
VHP offers a one-stop-shop for CTAs
VHP accepts electronic submissions only
Time lines for applicants and Competent Authorities are reliable and are met
Substantial Amendments are now included in the VHP