the use of look and say as a technique in …lib.unnes.ac.id/7567/1/10568.pdfin teaching reading to...

108
THE USE OF LOOK AND SAY AS A TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING TO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS (The Case of the Fourth Grade Students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal In the Academic Year of 2010/2011) a final project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan In English by Agnes Arum Budiana 2201407035 ENGLISH DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS SEMARANG STATE UNIVERSITY 2011

Upload: vuongcong

Post on 11-Aug-2019

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

THE USE OF LOOK AND SAY AS A TECHNIQUE

IN TEACHING READING TO ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL STUDENTS

(The Case of the Fourth Grade Students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal

In the Academic Year of 2010/2011)

a final project

submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements

for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan

In English

by

Agnes Arum Budiana

2201407035

ENGLISH DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS

SEMARANG STATE UNIVERSITY

2011

APPROVAL

This final project has been approved by the board of examination of the English

Department of Faculty of Languages and Arts Semarang State University on August 24th,

2011.

Board of Examination 1. Chairperson

Dra. Malarsih, M.Sn NIP 196106171988032001

2. Secretary Drs. Alim Sukrisno, M.A NIP 195206251981111001

3. First Examiner Drs. Jan Mujiyanto, M.Hum NIP 195312131983031002

4. Second Examiner as Second Advisor Drs. La Ode Musyaridun NIP 194612271983011001

5. Third Examiner as First Advisor Maria Johana Ari W. S.S., M.Si. NIP 197405162001122001

Approved by The Dean of the Faculty of Languages and Arts

Prof. Dr. Agus Nuryatin, M.Hum NIP 196008031989011001

iii

PERNYATAAN

Dengan ini saya, Nama : Agnes Arum Budiana NIM : 2201407035 Prodi/ Jurusan : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris/ Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris Fakultas : Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni

Menyatakan dengan sesungguhnya bahwa skripsi/ final project yang berjudul:

“The Use of Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching Reading to Elementary School Students (The Case of the Fourth Grade Students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal in the Academic Year of 2010/2011)”, Yang saya tulis dalam rangka memenuhi salah satu syarat untuk memperoleh gelar sarjana ini benar-benar merupakan karya saya sendiri yang saya hasilkan setelah melakukan penelitian, pembimbingan, diskusi dan pemaparan/ ujian. Semua kutipan baik yang langsung maupun tidak langsung, baik yang diperoleh dari sumber kepustakaan, wahana elektronik, wawancara langsung maupun sumber lainnya, telah disertai keterangan mengenai identitas sumbernya dengan cara sebagaimana yang lazim dalam penulisan karya ilmiah. Dengan demikian, walaupun Tim Penguji dan pembimbing penulisan skripsi/ final project ini telah membubuhkan tanda tangan sebagai tanda keabsahannya, seluruh karya ilmiah ini tetap menjadi tanggung jawab saya sendiri. Jika dikemudian hari ditemukan ketidakberesan, saya bersedia menerima akibatnya. Demikian, harap pernyataan ini dapat dipergunakan seperlunya. Semarang, Juli 2011 Yang membuat pernyataan Agnes Arum Budiana NIM. 2201407035

Carry your smile, spirit and surety . . .

You can touch the sky!

To

My beloved family,

Bapa Setio Budi, Ibu Ana,

Mba Tia, Ka Erfan, Fian and Dede’ Za.

My sugar,

Sapto Adi Wibowo.

My best friends.

v

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

First and foremost, I would like to thank Allah SWT, the Almighty for

blessing me with love, health, and inspiration leading to the completion of my

final project which is written to fulfill one of the requirements for the degree of

Sarjana Pendidikan in English. I realize that without assistance and guidance from

many people, I could not finish my final project. Therefore, I would love to

express my appreciation to:

(1) Prof. Dr. Agus Nuryatin, M.Hum, as the Dean of Faculty of Languages

and arts of Semarang State University

(2) Drs. Ahmad Sofwan, Ph.D as the Head of English Department of

Faculty of Languages and Arts of Semarang State University

(3) Maria Johana Ari W. S.S., M.Si., as the first advisor, who was willing to

give valuable and continuous guidance, advice as well as encouragement

in making and completing my final project

(4) Drs. La Ode Musyaridun, as the second advisor who has read my final

project and given many useful suggestions and corrections for its

improvement

(5) Dr. Jan Mujiyanto, M.Hum, as the first examiner who gives the

improvement of this final project

(6) All of the lecturers in English Department, who have given many

knowledge during my study

(7) Setio Budi, S.Pd, the Headmaster of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, for his

permission

vi

(8) All of the teachers and students in SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal for

allowing and helping me to carry out the research

(9) The students of four grade of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, for their

cooperation

(10) My beloved family, relatives and friends for giving much love and

support

(11) My sugar, who can open my eyes to be all I can be

(12) Melati, who always make me smile

(13) My beloved friends in Kost Pink Poenya Pak No for the warm and joyful

moments we have shared.

Finally, I am well aware that my final project is still far from being

excellent. Thus, I do not mind to accept any suggestion for the improvement of it.

I hope it will be useful for the readers.

Semarang, June 2011

Agnes Arum Budiana

vii

ABSTRACT

Budiana, Agnes Arum. 2011. The Use of Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching Reading to Elementary School Students (The Case of the Fourth Grade Students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal in the academic Year of 2010/2011). A final project, English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Semarang State University. Advisors: 1. Maria Johana Ari W. S.S., M.Si., 2. Drs. La Ode Musyaridun.

Keywords: Look and Say, teaching reading, elementary school students.

Elementary school students have different characteristics from adults. They easily get bored; lose interest after 10 minutes or so. The teacher of this level have got challenging task to motivate them. They need to modify the way of their teaching. So, they can use interesting technique in order to attract the students’ attention and interest. The objective of this study was to describe the application of using look and say as a technique in teaching reading to the fourth grade students of elementary school. This way hopefully, would be useful for teachers and students in language teaching learning process.

The study was an action research with two cycles. Each cycle consisted of teaching and learning process and a formative test. The difference between these cycles was on the materials used or given. There were four tests in this study: pre-test, formative test of cycle 1, formative test of cycle 2, and post-test. The result of the pre-test showed the average score was 58.10%. After having activities by using look and say, the students’ reading skill was improved. It was supported by the result of the formative tests. The average score of cycle 1 was 71.05% and the average score of cycle 2 was 82.36%. The result of the post-test indicated that the average score was 83.89%. It was higher than the average score of the pre-test.

In the questionnaire session, the students chose learning English by using look and say because it was enjoyable and lively. Furthermore, the result of the field notes written by the English teacher showed that the students were interested in the activities by using look and say to improve their reading skill.

Based on the result above, it could be concluded that the use of look and say was effective as a technique in teaching reading to elementary school students. In this study, I offer some suggestions. First, for students, it is good for them to practice reading by using look and say. Second, for teachers, they should use look and say as one of the techniques in teaching reading by regarding the students’ condition and characteristics. Third, for the next researchers, they could conduct deeper research by developing other technique.

viii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Acknowledgement ......................................................................................................... v

Abstract .......................................................................................................................... vii

Table of Contents .......................................................................................................... viii

List of Tables ................................................................................................................ xi

List of Charts ............................................................................................................... xii

List of Appendices ....................................................................................................... xiii

Chapter

I. INTODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Background of the Study ....................................................................... ................ 1

1.2 Reason for Choosing the Topic ........................................................................... .... 3

1.3 Limitation of the Study ......................................................................................... 4

1.4 Statement of the Problem ........................................................................ ............... 5

1.5 Objective of the Study ........................................................................................ ... 5

1.6 Significance of the Study ....................................................................... ............... 5

1.7 Outline of the Study .............................................................................................. 5

II. REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE .............................................. ............... 7

2.1 Review of the Previous Research .......................................................................... 7

2.2 General Concept of Reading ............................................................................... ... 8

2.3 Teaching English in Elementary School ................................................................ 11

2.4 Characteristics of Fourth Grade Students ............................................................. 12

2.5 The Look and Say Technique ................................................................................. 14

2.5.1 General Concept of Look and Say Technique ..................................... ............... 14

2.5.2 The Actions of Look and Say Technique ............................................ ............... 15

ix

2.6 Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching Reading ............................................. 16

2.7 Actions Research .................................................................................................. 17

2.7.1 Definitions of Action Research ......................................................................... 17

2.7.2 Characteristics of Action Research ................................................................... 18

2.7.3 The Cycle of Action Research .......................................................................... 19

2.8 Theoretical Framework ......................................................................................... 20

III. METHOD OF INVESTIGATION .................................................................. ... 22

3.1 Subject of Study ..................................................................................... .............. 22

3.2 Research Design ...................................................................................... .............. 22

3.2.1 Cycle 1 ............................................................................................................... 23

3.2.2 Cycle 2 ............................................................................................................. ... 24

3.3 Instruments of the Study ........................................................................ .............. 25

3.3.1 Test ...................................................................................................... .............. 25

3.3.2 Field Notes ........................................................................................... .............. 26

3.3.3 Questionnaire ................................................................................................... .. 26

3.4 Procedures of Collecting Data ............................................................... .............. 27

3.5 Criterion of Assessment ......................................................................... .............. 29

IV. DATA ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... ... 31

4.1 The Analysis of the Questionnaire ........................................................................ 31

4.2 Result of the Study ............................................................................................... 34

4.2.1 Result of the Pre-test ........................................................................... ............... 34

4.2.2 The Analysis of Cycle 1 .................................................................................. .... 37

4.2.3 The Analysis of Cycle 2 ....................................................................... ................ 41

4.2.4 Result of the Post-test ..................................................................................... .... 46

4.3 Improvement of the Students’ Reading Skill .......................................... ................ 49

x

4.5 The Overall Analysis ............................................................................................... 50

V. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS ........................................................... ..... 54

5.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................ ..... 51

5.2 Suggestions .............................................................................................................. 52

APPENDICES .............................................................................................................. 53

REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 94

xi

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1. The Activities of Cycle 1 ........................................................................................ 23

2. The Activities of Cycle 2 ........................................................................................ 24

3. The Result of Questionnaire ................................................................................... 31

4. The Result of the Pre-test ...................................................................................... 34

5. The Result of the Formative Test of Cycle 1 ........................................................ 38

6. The Result of the Formative Test of Cycle 2 ........................................................ 42

7. The Result of the Post-test .................................................................................... 46

xii

LIST OF CHARTS

Chart Page

1. The result of the Formative test of Cycle 1 ...................................................... 40

2. The result of the Formative test of Cycle 2 ...................................................... 44

3. Improvement of the Students’ Reading Skill from Pre-Test to Post-test ........ 49

xiii

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix Page

1. The Name List of the Students ........................................................................ 54

2. Lesson Plans ..................................................................................................... 56

3. The Zoo ........................................................................................................... 64

4. Occupations ..................................................................................................... 65

5. Pre-test ............................................................................................................ 66

6. Formative Test of Cycle 1 .............................................................................. 72

7. Formative Test of Cycle 2 .............................................................................. 75

8. Post-test .......................................................................................................... 77

9. Scores Analysis of the Pre-test ....................................................................... 81

10. Scores Analysis of the Formative Test of Cycle 1 .......................................... 82

11. Scores Analysis of the Formative Test of Cycle 2 .......................................... 83

12. Scores Analysis of the Post-test ...................................................................... 84

13. Questionnaire .................................................................................................. 85

14. Field Notes ...................................................................................................... 87

15. Documentations .............................................................................................. 91

16. Flash Cards ..................................................................................................... 92

1

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

In this chapter, I present background of the study, reason for choosing the topic,

limitation of the study, statement of the problem, objective of the study,

significance of the study, outline of the study.

1.1 Background of the Study

Language is a multi-purpose medium of expression. Language enables people to

express their feeling, thought, and mind. In social life, people use language to

communicate with others in fulfilling their daily needs. In academic

environment, language plays a role in an interactive process between student and

teacher. Student and his/her peer, student and his/her lessons. Each country may

have its own language that is used for communication by the people. English is

one of the international languages, which is used as a means of both oral and

written communication. It is the most well known language in the world which is

spoken as a first language by millions of people and used as means of

communication by many more all over the world. People in non-English

speaking countries like Japan, China, and Indonesia learn English as a second or

foreign language. We need English to get involved in international society.

Teaching English has existed in Indonesia for many years. It used to

focus on vocabulary and grammar structures. Teachers are also expected to help

students to be able to communicate in English. The language skills: listening,

speaking, reading, and writing; must be taught integratively and holistically.

2

English subject has been introduced for almost ten years in Indonesian

elementary schools. It began to be applied at fourth grade. Because the

characteristic of elementary school students are different from those of

secondary school students, our government construct curriculum, which is

suitable for young learners. English subject for elementary school covers oral

communication ability limitedly in school context. Reading and writing skills are

supposed to support oral communication learning. The materials focus on

language accompanying action. By learning English, elementary school students

are expected to be able to use English to accompany action, participate in

classroom and school interactions, and recognize simple written English.

In this study I focused on teaching reading in fourth grade students of

elementary school. Reading is the skill that children acquire first before they

have not yet learnt to write. Language learning is a hard task, which can

sometimes be frustrating. In fact, most of our language learning comes from

reading. At their age, children still find difficulty in learning their mother tongue

(Javanese) and second language (Indonesian). So since English is a foreign

language for Indonesian children, we must choose appropriate teaching methods

which will make them not afraid of English.

Young learners are often more enthusiastic and lively in learning

something new. They will make an attempt to get involved in an activity even

when they do not quite understand why or how. However, they also lose interest

more quickly and they are less able to keep themselves motivated on tasks they

find difficult. Therefore, they need an interesting techniques can be found easily

3

like using song, pictures, and cards. For this study I choose to use cards as an

alternative by using look and say technique in teaching reading.

In look and say technique, it is based on words and phrases, and makes a

lot of use of flashcards. It is usual started by teaching words which are already

familiar to the children. The teacher shows the children the word and says it

while pointing to the object. The children repeat the word. This happens several

times with each word. The introduction of the words only take a short time, and

goes quite quickly, so the teacher may spend five minutes of a thirty minute

lesson on four new words. So this technique encourages recognition of a range of

words and phrases before reading a text.

In this research, I want to find out how effective the use of look and say

is as a technique in teaching reading to the fourth grade students of SD Negeri 1

Kambangan, Tegal in the academic year of 2010/2011.

1.2 Reason for Choosing the Topic

In this study, I have chosen the topic “The Use of Look and Say as a Technique

in Teaching Reading to Elementary School Students”, because I am interested in

teaching English for young learner. Most of them usually find difficulties in

learning English because it is different in vocabulary, pronunciation and

grammatical rules from their mother tongue. Besides that the students have

unstable emotion which may disturb their language learning in the classroom.

Many teachers are still applying conventional teacher-centered method in

teaching reading. They ask the students to memorize all reading materials

4

without providing supporting aids. It creates stressful class situation that makes

the students uncreative. Whereas in fact elementary students need both auditory

and visual aids to fully understand the reading materials. Learning should be

contextualized. The materials should be related to real-life reading. Teachers

should use interactive methods and techniques in teaching reading for

elementary school students to make them enjoy the learning process.

For the reason above, I want to suggest a technique in teaching reading for

the fourth grade students of elementary school that is look and say technique.

Look and say is a learning-by-doing technique. Look and say gives visual clues

for the students to understand meaning much clearer. By using look and say

technique, I wish that teachers would get maximum outcome in teaching reading.

1.3 Limitation of the Study

In order to get a clear description of this study about using look and say as a

technique to teach reading, I limit the scope of this study as follows:

(1) The using look and say as a technique in teaching reading of simple text

for fourth grade level of students SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal.

(2) The subject of the study is the fourth grade students of SD Negeri

Kambangan 1, Tegal. Therefore, the generalization of the research

finding is applied only to the subject in question.

5

1.4 Statement of the Problem

The problem that will be discussed in this study is: How to apply look and say as

a technique in teaching reading to the fourth grade students of elementary

school?

1.5 Objective of the Study

The objectives of this study is to describe the application of look and say as a

technique in teaching reading to the fourth grade students of elementary school.

1.6 Significance of the Study

The significance of the study can be stated as follows:

(1) For students: it will suggest an alternative technique to motivate them to

learn English especially in reading. It may help students to comprehend

the reading material.

(2) For the English teacher: it will suggest an alternative method in teaching

reading to the students.

1.7 Outline of the Report

This study consists of five chapters, those are as follows:

Chapter I consists the introduction covering background of the study,

reason for choosing the topic, limitation of the study, statements of problem,

objective of the study, significance of the study, definition of terms and outline

of the study.

6

Chapter II discusses the review of related literature as the theoretical basis

for the study.

Chapter III is the method of investigation. It consists of subject of the study,

research design, instrument of the study, procedures of collecting data, validity

and reliability, method of analyzing data and criterion of assessment.

Chapter IV presents research findings, which consist of data analysis and

discussions of the result.

Chapter V consists of conclusions and suggestions of the research.

7

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

In this chapter, I present the review of related literature. It consists of review of the

previous research, general concept of reading, teaching English in elementary school,

the characteristics of fourth grade students, the look and say technique, look and say as

a technique in teaching reading, action research, and theoretical framework.

2.1 Review of the Previous Research

There are many studies conducted to know the students’ mastery of reading skills.

These studies include many studies done by the English department students of

Semarang State University (UNNES). Here are some previous studies related to this

research which are relevant in teaching English.

In 2009, Resty Anggraeni conducted a research called “Storytelling as a

Technique in Teaching Reading at Elementary School” (A Case of Fifth Year Students

of SDN Wonosekar in the Academic Year of 2008/2009). She took conclusion that

students’ reading skill achievement was improved after implementing storytelling as a

technique in teaching reading.

A research entitled “The Use of Fables to Improve the Students’ Reading

Comprehension” (A Case of the Year Eight Students of SMP Negeri 2 Juwana in the

Academic Year 2007/2008) was conducted by Kusni Hartini in 2008. She took

conclusion that the use of fables could improve the students’ reading comprehension.

The main factors affecting that successful are the students’ interest in reading fables.

8

Rizkiana Hidayati (2009) conducted a research dealing with technique for

teaching English to elementary school students. The research entitled “The Use of

Miming Stories as a Technique in Teaching Listening to Elementary School Students”

(The Case of the Fifth Grade Students of SD Negeri 1 Procot, Tegal in the Academic

Year of 2008/2009). The conclusion of her research is miming stories was effective as a

technique in teaching listening to elementary school students. The interesting technique

is able to grab students’ attention in learning English.

Dealing with the use of cards for teaching English to elementary school

students, a research entitled “Teaching Simple Noun Phrases Using Quartet Cards to

the Fifth Graders of SD 1 Mlati Kidul Kudus in the Academic Year of 2006/2007” was

conducted by Anita Mardiana in 2007. The result is the activities using quartet cards

could help the students in mastering simple noun phrases.

After reviewing the previous study, I can conclude that there are many

researchers that discussed about teaching English to Elementary school students

especially in reading, the technique in reading, and the media that was used. From the

techniques that have applied, I would like to use look and say as a technique to teach

reading to elementary school students.

2.2 General Concept of Reading

Few of us can remember the exact moment when we learned how to read. This is

mostly because we learned to read when we were very young and it is difficult to

remember our very early years. Few of us can remember the moment when we

suddenly knew that print represented meaning.

9

According to Caroline T. Linse (2006: 69), reading is a set of skills that involves

making sense and deriving meaning from the printed word. In order to read, we must be

able to decode (sound out) the printed words and also comprehend what we read. For

second-language learners there are three different elements which impact reading: the

child’s background knowledge, the child’s linguistic knowledge of the target language,

and the strategies or technique the child uses to tackle the text. For example, if a child is

going to learn how to decode letters, she must understand what different written

symbols represent. In some language such as English, Spanish, Arabic, and Korean, a

certain symbol represents a specific letter. These languages are known as alphabetic

languages. Furthermore, children who are able to read in their native language are at an

advantage over children who cannot read in their native language because they

understand the key concept that printed symbols can be used to represent spoken words.

Also, children who can read in their native language may also know that reading can be

for both pleasure and information. By developing strong literacy skills in their native

language, it will be easier for young learners to transfer those skills into English.

As a teacher of young learners, it is helpful to ascertain what reading concepts

children have acquired in their native language so we can assist in the transfer of the

relevant skills from first-language to second-language literacy (Caroline T. Linse 2006:

69).

Decoding

Decoding means finding the meaning of something, especially something written in

code (Hornby, 302). Reading decoding skills is the ability to make sense of printed

words. This involves recalling and recognizing the spoken word that is represented by

10

the printed word. In other words, reading decoding skills is the ability to understand

that a printed word represents the spoken word, and that this printed word is made of a

sequence of phonemes. To take it a step further, reading decoding skills also require the

ability to recognize the individual phonemes and phoneme blends.

In order to read, we must recognize the symbols that form or make up words.

When readers decode, they decipher individual words. Many languages use a phonetic

alphabet. In these languages, written symbols represent a specific sound or phoneme.

English has approximately 40 sounds but uses only 26 symbols. This can cause

problems for speakers of language which have a one-to-one sound-letter

correspondence, such as Russian or Spanish. Because of the exceptions to

sound/symbol correspondence in English, children can get very frustrated when they try

to decode English words. For example, the letter c is used to decode both a hard and

soft sound in English. The hard c sound, /k/, found in cat and carpet is more common

than the soft c sound, /s/, found in cereal. However in Russian, the symbol c is always

used to denote the soft /s/ sound (Caroline T. Linse: 70).

Comprehension

Comprehension is the power of understanding (Hornby: 235). And the aim of reading is

comprehension. Some individuals equate decoding with reading. Just because a learner

knows how to pronounce written words correctly, doesn’t mean that he can read.

Reading comprehension refers to reading for meaning, understanding, and

entertainment (Caroline T. Linse: 71). It involves higher-order thinking skills and is

much more complex than merely decoding specific words. Teaching children how to

derive meaning as well as analyze and synthesize what they have read is an essential

11

part of the reading process. There are two main reasons that people read: the first is for

pleasure and the second is for information.

2.3 Teaching English in Elementary School

English has been a major subject in secondary and high schools in Indonesia for years,

but it is newly applied in elementary school as a local subject. So although it is not

included to the National Final Examination subjects, English materials students get in

elementary school will be very beneficial for them in the next school levels.

There are four literacy levels mentioned at the national curriculum of English

subject: performative, functional, informational, and epistemic (KTSP, 2006). The

performative level is for elementary school level. This level breaks the code of knowing

the relationship between spoken and written symbols. It means elementary students are

able to listen, speak, read, and write simplest forms of English. This is the basis for

them to support their English learning in secondary school.

According to Hidayati (2009: 11), English in elementary school develops

language accompanying action. It emphasizes mostly spoken language that covers oral

communication ability limitedly in school context. Reading and writing skills are

supposed to support oral communication learning (listening and speaking skills). By

learning English elementary school students are expected to be able to use English to

accompany action, participate in classroom and school interactions, and recognize

simple written English. To fulfill those competences, teachers drill students many

simple adjacency pairs like instructions and commands in spoken form. But in reality

many elementary school teachers have already taught the students such difficult things

12

like grammar and long written texts. They do not utilize enjoyable teaching methods.

Of course it makes students not interested in English. Later it will create misconception

that English is boring, or even horrible. Whereas it is possible to teach English using a

learning-by-doing technique in which it will cheer up the class situation. Therefore, the

application of look and say as a technique in teaching reading is in accordance with the

focus of curriculum that is developing language accompanying action.

2.4 Characteristics of Fourth Grade Students

Most Indonesian children enter elementary school at five or six years old. So they will

be around nine years old when they are in the fourth grade. Elementary school students

obviously have different characteristics and motivation from secondary and high school

students. As a result, teachers must differ the way of teaching in every school level.

According to Scott and Ytreberg (1990: 3-4), some of the characteristics of

elementary school students as young learners which I connect with my study are as

follows:

(1) Their basic concepts are formed. They have very decided views of the world.

Respect them and respect what they want. Be realistic about what they can manage at

an individual level, then our expectations will be realistic too.

(2) They can tell the difference between fact and fiction although they may have some

difficulties distinguishing between imagination and real world. They are imaginative.

Use realia or pictures to teach new vocabulary related to concrete meanings.

13

(3) They ask question all the time. It means they have a high curiosity and they are very

active. Try to ask them to play games, role play dialogues and involve them in

competitions.

(4) They rely on the spoken word as well as the physical world to convey and

understand meaning. So don’t rely on the spoken word only. Most activities for the

younger learners should include movement and involve the senses. We need to have

plenty of objects and pictures to work with, and to make full use of the school and our

surroundings.

(5) They are able to make some decisions about their own learning. Since their

concentration and attention spans are short, variety is a must – variety of activity,

variety of pace, variety of organization, variety of voice.

(6) They have definite views about what they like and don’t like doing. Paying

attention to children’s belongings, the treasures they carry around, is another good way

to learn about their interests and development. What children put in their book bags can

be a real eye opener. For example, a boy who carries miniature basketballs in his pencil

case will most likely have a special interest in basketball. A child who carries and reads

books without any pictures has probably developed advanced cognitive skills.

(7) They have a developed sense of fairness about what happens in the classroom and

begin to question the teacher’s decisions.

(8) They are able to work with others and learn from others. We can watch children as

they interact with their peers, other teachers and their parents. By watching their

interactions, we are able to look at their development from an emotional and social

perspective (Scott and Ytreberg: 3-4).

14

According Scott and Ytreberg (1990: 4), young learners develop quickly in

learning a new language. Their learning comes from the five body senses. They watch,

listen, and imitate their teacher. They are enthusiastic in using their imagination.

Therefore using look and say technique may be appropriate for them in learning a new

language. Flash cards with pictures that are used in look and say technique will help

young learners to understand meaning much easily. This technique may cheer up the

class’ situation in which it later lengthens and strengthens their attention and

concentration span. Therefore, it may help students to be successful in learning English.

2.5 The Look and Say Technique

Using look and say technique may be one of the best ways in introducing a new

language to children because language learning is a hard task which can be sometimes

frustrating. Learning English is not easy for Indonesian children. Therefore, using this

technique may be the right choice.

2.5.1 General Concept of Look and Say Technique

According to Scott and Ytreberg (1990: 50), this technique is based on words and

phrases, and makes a lot of use of flashcards.

It is usual to start by teaching everyday words which are already familiar to the

children. The teacher shows the children the word and says it while pointing to the

object. The children repeat the word. This happens several times with each word. The

introduction of the words only takes a short time, and goes quite quickly, so the teacher

may spend five minutes of a thirty minute lesson on four new words. There are a lot of

word recognition games which can be done at this stage – matching words and pictures,

15

pointing to the object on the card, guessing which card Teddy has picked out of the hat

– and so this technique encourages recognition of a range of words and phrases before

reading a text (Scott and Ytreberg, 1990)

2.5.2 The Actions of Look and Say Technique

According to Scott and Ytreberg (1990: 51), with the look and say technique children

learn to recognize whole words or sentences rather than individual sounds. Students

will look at a word which teacher sound, and in turn will repeat the sound (the word).

Flashcards with individual words written on them are used for this technique often

accompanied with a related picture.

If teacher doesn't use a picture with the word the child will probably make a wild

guess as to what it says trying to remember what sound teacher made previously. This

is not a good technique if teacher don't include pictures.

It is also recommended with this technique to use whole short sentences rather

than individual words. Teacher writes a short sentence representing the picture

displayed. Then teacher says the sentence and ask the child to repeat it while pointing

and looking at each individual word as he/she repeats what teacher said.

By making word cards teacher can create different sentences again and again.

Teacher can use each word card first to learn individual words and then laying the word

cards together to form a sentence. The look and say approach was developed by modern

psychologists and denies the students the tools used in the Phonics system but teaches

them to learn through rote memorization. Students could become poorer readers due to

being forced to "learn to read" with the look-see methods, but if you have the teaching

16

skills to combine both it would benefit your students enormously (Scott and Ytreberg,

1990).

2.6 Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching Reading

Teachers often use ‘look and say’ as part of vocabulary teaching. So when children

learn to say a new word they learn to read it (Slattery and Willis: 67). Teacher can help

children with whole word recognition by using printed material as much as she can in

her classroom. Of course, the new words are learnt in context. This can also be done

with phrases. Children use the same recognition skills when they are remembering a

word or short phrase. There are a lot of word recognition games which can be done at

this stage: matching words and pictures, recognizing the correct word, and reading

words. Teachers could use these activities before children read a story or say a rhyme

which includes these words.

In matching words and pictures games for example, children match the written

words to the picture on the board. Teacher asks students to look at the words on cards

and say it loudly. Then students put them beside the matching picture on the

blackboard. According to Slattery and Willis (2001: 75), the activities show how

teacher can:

(1) Focus on new words in context. It means we had better focus on new words that

students don’t know before and related to the text that is discussed in context.

(2) Teach sound and letter/word recognition at the same time. So when students learn to

say a new word they learn to read it.

17

(3) Get children to match sound and written word. We can help students with whole

word recognition by using printed material as much as we can in our classroom, e.g.

word cards used for labeling and directions. Of course, the new words are learnt in

context.

(4) Repeat constantly to teach pronunciation. We could drill some words or phrases in

order to get student’s good pronunciation.

(5) Let children have fun while learning to read. Since they have short attention span,

teacher should vary their techniques to break the boredom. They should give varied

activities as handwriting, games, songs etc (Slattery and Willis 2001: 75).

2.7 Action Research

The study I conducted was an action research. Action research is the most familiar

research used in educational world today.

2.7.1 Definitions of Action Research

Many practitioners in education have conducted action research for years. Action

research itself has some definitions. Action research utilizes a series of methodologies

and approaches. Although action research is generally identified with qualitative

approaches, it can incorporate both qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Practitioners stated here refer to teachers. So action research is also called

“teacher-research”. Therefore, Cochron-Smith and Lytle in Johnson defined teacher-

research as systematic and intentional inquiry carried out by teacher (1993: 215)

18

From the definitions above, it can be concluded that action research is a systematic

and intentional research conducted in a classroom with the purpose of improving the

effectiveness of teaching and learning process.

2.7.2 Characteristics of Action Research

Unlike other researchers, action research has special characteristics which are different

from others. Priyono in Subyantoro (2007: 9-10) gives six characteristics of action

research as follow:

(1) On-the job problem-oriented. It means the subject of the study is the real problem

that becomes teacher’s main responsibility at school;

(2) Problem-solving oriented. The goal of action research is to sole problems in

classroom;

(3) Improvement oriented. All school components such as teachers, headmaster, and

students, must change and improve better for the sake of the school itself;

(4) Multiple data collection. Action research utilizes several methods of data collecting,

like observation, test, interview, questionnaire, etc;

(5) Cyclic. Action research consists of four cycles: planning, observing, acting, and

reflecting;

(6) Participatory (collaborative). The researcher cooperates with other practitioners to

enhance the validity of the research (Priyono in Subyantoro 2007: 9-10).

19

2.7.3 The Cycle of Action Research

Action research is cyclical. The process does not necessarily have to stop at any

particular point. Information gained from previous research may open new avenues of

research. That is why action research is ongoing.

There are four guiding steps in every cycle of action research, as shown in

figure below.

Cycle I Cycle II

------ -----

(1) Planning

In the first step researcher has to be firmly know what he/she want to investigate. Then

she develops some question about the chosen area. Later she will establish a plan to

answer these questions. The plan includes constructing lesson plans, choosing methods

of collecting and analyzing data, preparing instruments and documentation.

(2) Acting

In this step researcher applies the planning actions to solve the problems.

Planning Planning

Reflection Acting Acting Reflection

Observation Observation

20

(3) Observation

Observation is the activity of collecting data, either qualitative or quantitative data, to

identify to what degree result of the actions reaches the objective of the study.

(4) Reflection

Reflection is the activity of critically evaluating the change of the students, teacher and

class situation after conducting the actions.

2.8 Theoretical Framework

In this study, I focus on teaching reading in fourth grade students of elementary school

by using look and say technique. Reading is the skill that children acquire first before

they have not yet learnt to write. Language learning is a hard task, which can

sometimes be frustrating. In fact, most of our language learning comes from reading.

So since English is a foreign language for Indonesian children, we must choose

appropriate teaching methods which will make them not afraid of English.

According Scott and Ytreberg (1990: 45), young learners are often more

enthusiastic and lively in learning something new. They will make an attempt to get

involved in an activity even when they do not quite understand why or how. However,

they also lose interest more quickly and they are less able to keep themselves motivated

on tasks they find difficult. Therefore, they need an interesting techniques can be found

easily like using song, pictures, and cards. For this study I choose to use cards as an

alternative by using look and say technique in teaching reading.

The study is an action research with two cycles. Each cycle consist of teaching

and learning process and a formative test. The difference between these cycles is on the

21

materials used or given. There are four tests in this study: pre-test, formative test of

cycle 1, formative test of cycle 2, and post-test. Students will be given treatments by

using look and say as a technique in teaching reading.

The objective of this research is to describe the application of look and say as a

technique in teaching reading to fourth grade students of elementary school. And the

subject of this study is fourth grade students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal.

22

CHAPTER III

METHOD OF INVESTIGATION

This chapter presents method of investigation which is divided into five subsections:

subject of the study, research design, instruments of study, procedures of collecting

data, and criterion of assessment.

3.1 Subject of Study

To reach the objective of the study, I conducted an action research at SD Negeri

Kambangan 1 Tegal. This elementary school is located at Lebaksiu sub district in

Tegal regency. There were six grades. I decided to choose the fourth grade students

because they were in the first year of learning English. Teacher needed to reinforce

their motivation in learning English. In class there were 38 students consisting of 24

boys and 14 girls. I took all the students at the subject.

3.2 Research Design

I conducted two cycles (cycle 1 and cycle 2) in this research. Every cycle of this

research consists of four phases. They are planning, action, observation and

reflection. The orders of activities during the research were presented more clearly as

the table next page.

23

3.2.1 Cycle 1

Table 1. The activities of Cycle 1

Planning Selecting a problem as the topic for the study.

Finding an institution to do an action research (SD Negeri

Kambangan 1 Tegal).

Asking the principal of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal for

permission to conduct the study there.

Constructing teaching plans and instruments of the study (test items,

field note sheets, and questionnaire).

Action First Activity (Pre-test)

Explaining materials briefly and giving a pre-test.

Second Activity (Treatment)

1. Developing a background understanding of the text to

the students.

2. Reading the text.

3. Explaining the key words of the text.

4. Reading the text again and practicing look and say

technique to convey the whole content of the text.

5. Giving a formative test to the students.

Observation Analyzing and collecting the result of the action. Its purpose is to

know to what extent the result of “action” reaches the objective.

24

Reflection Finding out the significant progress from the first activity to the last

activity.

3.2.2 Cycle 2

Table 2. The Activities of Cycle 2

Planning Focusing on the unsolved problem.

Modify the teaching plans.

Action First Activity (Treatment)

1. Developing a background understanding of the text to

the students.

2. Reading the second text.

3. Explaining the key words of the text.

4. Reading the text again and practicing look and say

technique.

5. Giving a formative test to the students to check the

students’ progress.

Second Activity (Post-Test)

1. Reviewing all materials given.

2. Giving a post-test to compare the difference of the

results of the students between before and after using look

and say technique.

25

3. Distributing the questionnaire to know the students’

interest and opinion about the use of look and say technique

in teaching English.

Observation Analyzing and collecting the result of the action to know to what

extent it reaches the objective.

Reflection Finding out the significant progress of the whole processes of the

study.

Analyzing the result of field notes and questionnaire.

3.3 Instruments of the Study

To support my study, I utilized three kinds of instruments: tests, field notes and

questionnaire. These instruments were appropriate to the school environment

and could be used effectively and efficiently to collect the data needed.

3.3.1 Test

A test is a method of measuring a person’s ability, knowledge, or performance in

given domain (Brown, 2004, 3). Test plays an important role in teaching and learning

experience.

The tests used in this research are pre-test, two formative tests and post test.

The pre-test was conducted to check the students’ reading ability in comprehending

the materials. The students were given 25 items of multiple choices test. If the

students’ results of the pre-test are lower than the criterion, I will begin to conduct

26

action research cycles by using the new technique. There were two cycles. In the end

of every cycle, I presented 10 items of multiple choices as formative test to know the

result of the students after they had been treated by using look and say in the action.

After all of the cycles are done, I gave post-test to compare the difference of

the results of the students between before and after the look and say treatments given

to them. In this test, I presented 25 items of multiple choices test.

3.3.2 Field Notes

Field notes were used to collect qualitative data. Field notes described the situation

and the activities during the teaching and learning process. By using field notes, I

could know whether the teaching and learning process was making progress or

declined.

In this study, I wanted to observe, to check, and to take notes about:

(1) The class situation during teaching and learning process;

(2) The implementation of look and say technique in teaching and learning process;

(3) The participation of the students in teaching and learning process;

(4) The condition of reading ability of the students.

3.3.3 Questionnaire

Questionnaire is a list of questions to be answered by a number of people. The

purpose of distributing questionnaire in this study was to collect information from the

27

students about the factors that may influence their improvement in reading. To

calculate the result of questionnaire, the formula is on next page:

∑x = the number of students’ answer

n = the total number of the students

I selected close questionnaire to be filled out by the students because it was relatively

easy to construct and easy to analyze. The responses were only “Yes” and “No”. The

questionnaire was used to find out:

(1) The students’ interest in learning English, especially reading;

(2) The advantages students got after using look and say technique;

(3) The students’ opinion about the continuity of the program conducted during the

action research.

3.4 Procedures of Collecting Data

In doing the action research, I use the several appropriate techniques and methods. To

carry out my study, I have to collect the data containing some information needed for

the research. Mc Niff (1997: 76) states there is a list of techniques, which can be used

to gather the evidence in the reconnaissance and monitoring phases of action

research.

The percentage (%) = x 100%

28

According to the Mc Niff’s techniques, each of them has advantages and

disadvantages in their use. In this research, in order to collect the data, I use the pre-

test and post-test, field notes, and questionnaires. I take the pre-test and post-test

based on the considerations that generally they are not expensive. The aims of using

pre and post tests are to know the students’ response during the activities, to see their

abilities in mastering the reading materials and their progress, to gather information

and to find a simple way for students to answer the specific predetermined questions.

The test (sometimes called ‘quiz’) can be seen either as a general observational

procedure, akin to the case study, protocol or experiment, for eliciting data on how

users behave in particular dictionary reference situations, or as a way of measuring

the knowledge or performance of an individual or group inrelation to achievable

proficiency levels before, during or after courses on dictionary skills (Hartman, 2001:

119).

I decide to use multiple choice test type based on the following

considerations:

(1) Multiple choice test type is economical in term of the number of item that

can be answered in a short period of testing time

(2) Students’ test paper can be easily and quickly scored

(3) Since the correct answers are limited in number, objective test type will

not make examinees have different interpretation of studet’s test paper (Harris,

1969: 2)

29

Meanwhile, the other technique in collecting data is the use of field notes. The

aim is to have the document about the situation of the class where I am conducting

the action research. Mc Niff (1997: 77) says that the use of field notes is more than

keeping a record book as a kind of diary which would record only ground covered

and material used. He says further that the document is a significant aspect of the

action. Therefore I pay attention to the students’ response during the activity

objectively. I systematically keep notes of the class situation, either while the lesson

is in progress or immediately afterwards. Beside field notes, a questionnaire is also

given. I take the questionnaire because they are highly specific, easy and

comparative. I give some questions to the students in a paper related to the teaching

and learning process, and English teaching. The students answer the questions

honestly.

3.5 Criterion of Assessment

I will know the students’ success and the failure in doing this action research by

referring to the criterion of Department of Education and Culture.

To find the degree of the students’ achievement in each activity, from pre-test

up to post-test, the score of each student was counted individually by using the

following formula:

The percentage .

30

While the average of the students’ result was counted by using the following

formula:

The average of the students’ result = .

The criterion says that the students can be said to be successful if they can

achieve 65% of the material and a class can be said to have mastered in learning if it

can achieve 85% of the material presented (Depdikbud, 2004: 29). In this action

research, I used that indicator to determine whether an activity could be continued to

the next activity or should be repeated by applying the amended plan.

31

CHAPTER IV

DATA ANALYSIS

4.1 The Analysis of the Questionnaire

One of the activities in this research was distributing the questionnaire. It was conducted after the

students had finished doing the post-test on 4 June 2011. The students were given questionnaire

sheet and they had to answer the questions by choosing ‘yes’ or ‘no’ options for each question.

The questionnaire contained three aspects: the students’ interest in learning English, especially

reading (question numbers 1,2,3,4, and 5); the advantages students got after using look and say

technique (question numbers 6,7, and 8); and the students’ opinion about the continuity of the

program conducted during the action research (question numbers 9 and 10). The formula to

calculate the percentage of questionnaire is as follow:

∑x = the number of students’ answer

n = the total number of the students.

The following table shows the result of this activity.

Table 7. The Result of Questionnaire

Aspect Item YES NO

X % X %

The students’

interest in

1. Apakah kamu menyukai pelajaran

bahasa Inggris?

38

100

0

0

The percentage (%) = x 100%

32

learning

English

2. Menurut kamu apakah pelajaran bahasa

Inggris sangat berguna dalam kehidupan

sehari-hari?

32

84.21

6

15.79

3. Apakah kamu menyukai pelajaran

membaca bahasa Inggris?

34

89.47

4

10.52

4. Menurut kamu apakah reading

(membaca) itu menyenangkan?

38

100

0

0

5. Apakah kamu mengalami kesulitan

dalam membaca teks bahasa Inggris?

28

73.68

10

26.31

The

advantages of

the technique

6. Apakah kamu menyukai teknik look and

say (lihat dan ucapkan) yang telah

diberikan?

33

86.84

5

13.15

7. Apakah dengan menggunakan teknik

look and say (melihat dan

mengucapkan) dapat membantu kamu

dalam pelajaran reading (membaca)?

37

97.36

1

2.63

8. Menurut kamu apakah cara pengajaran

yang telah diberikan dapat

mempermudah kamu dalam membaca

dan memahami teks berbahasa Inggris?

38

100

0

0

The continuity

of the

technique

9. Apakah kegiatan seperti ini menambah

kebiasaan kamu dalam belajar bahasa

Inggris?

34

89.47

4

10.52

10. Apakah kegiatan ini perlu dilakukan

terus menerus?

24

63.15

14

36.84

The result of the data analysis showed that there were thirty eight students answering

‘yes’ for item number (1). It meant that all of the students liked English. In item number (2),

33

15.79% of the students thought that English was not beneficial for their daily life although they

liked it. But 32 students or more than half of the class considered that learning English had a

good effect to their life. English is the only compulsory foreign language in Indonesian

elementary school as well as high school. The knowledge of English students get in all school

levels will prepare them to get involved in international society.

For item number (3), 89.47% of the class responded ‘yes’. Only four students were

uninterested in reading to English. In item number (4), all of the students thought that reading to

English was fun as they also liked English subject. Ten students or about 26.3% of the class had

difficulties in reading to English text. This was shown by the result of item number (5). It

becomes a challenge for the teacher to modify the way of teaching English at school.

In item number (6), most of the students like look and say technique. It reached 86.84%

of the students who answered ‘yes’. For item number (7), thirty seven students or about 97% of

the class agreed that look and say technique could help them in reading to English. In item

number (8), it showed that all of the students answered ‘yes’. It means that the way of teaching

reading during the research helped them to understand English materials. 100% of the students

were more interested in teaching and learning activities which used an interactive technique. It

helped the students to sustain their attention. The technique gave the students visual clues to

understand the content of the text much easier and clearer.

The result of item number (9) was thirty four students chose ‘yes’. The activities during

the research enhanced their English learning habit to a better one. But unfortunately, 36.84% of

the class disagreed if the teacher often used look and say technique in teaching reading. This

technique is just one of many alternative techniques to teach English. Teacher should be wise to

choose which one is suitable for the students.

34

The questionnaire was mostly answered with ‘YES’ or positive response and followed by

the significant result on the post-test. In addition, it can be concluded that look and say helped

the students in learning reading to English.

4.2 Result of the Study

In this chapter I am going to present the result of the data analysis from the research activities.

The quantitative data were obtained from the evaluation tests which were taken from the pre-test,

the formative test of cycle 1, the formative test of cycle 2, and the post test. I also got the

qualitative/non-test data from the observations during teaching and learning processes.

4.2.1 Result of the Pre-test

The pre-test was conducted at the beginning of the research on 1 June 2011. There were 38

students who took the test. The purpose of this test was to check the students’ reading ability.

The test consisted of 25 multiple-choice items. The result of the students’ achievement in the

pre-test can be seen as follows.

Table 3. The Result of the Pre-test

No. Test Code The Right Score %

1. P-1 20 80

2. P-2 19 76

3. P-3 14 56

4. P-4 16 64

5. P-5 8 32

6. P-6 10 40

35

7. P-7 10 40

8. P-8 10 40

9. P-9 14 56

10. P-10 13 52

11. P-11 11 44

12. P-12 18 72

13. P-13 17 68

14. P-14 21 84

15. P-15 15 60

16. P-16 14 56

17. P-17 24 96

18. P-18 15 60

19. P-19 14 56

20. P-20 21 84

21. P-21 9 36

22. P-22 9 36

23. P-23 14 56

24. P-24 18 72

25. P-25 8 32

26. P-26 18 72

27. P-27 17 68

28. P-28 13 52

29. P-29 13 52

36

30. P-30 15 60

31. P-31 18 72

32. P-32 14 56

33. P-33 6 24

34. P-34 20 80

35. P-35 19 76

36. P-36 11 44

37. P-37 14 56

38. P-38 12 48

∑ = 38 ∑ = 552 ∑ = 2208

The average of the students’ result = The total number of the percentage The number of the students

= 2208% 38 = 58.1%. The average of the students’ scores was 58.1%. According to the criterion of assessment

of Department of National Education, the class was classified unsuccessful.

This result was influenced by the students’ behaviors during teaching and learning

processes. Some students did not pay attention to the teacher. Some students looked sleepy and

bored. There were also some who talked to each other. Even there was a male student bothering

his female friends. The noisy surroundings were hardly conducive to concentrated study.

Therefore, the students needed a new technique in teaching English, especially reading.

37

4.2.2 The Analysis of Cycle 1

The activities of cycle 1 began on 2 June 2011. The whole thirty eight students followed the

teaching and learning processes. The English teacher, Mrs. Santi, joined the class and supervised

me. During the processes I made use of two languages: English and Indonesian.

The topic used in this cycle was ‘The Zoo’. In this activity, the students were given

vocabulary related to the topic. I also gave some commands to the students, such as raise your

hand, stand up, look at the picture, say it loudly, come forward, and sit down.

At the beginning of the class, I read the text and asked the students to repeat after me.

After it was over, I explained the key words of the text. While the class was listening to me, I

practiced look and say technique to convey the whole content of the text. I provided some

teaching aids to help the students to know what they were going to do in these activities. I

showed many flash cards, some pictures, and some words related to the pictures. Then, I put the

pictures on the blackboard.

In the next session, I explained briefly about the method used in teaching learning

process. I showed the flashcards one by one and I asked the students to look and say it loudly. To

check the understanding of the students, I asked them to guess what pictures were about. The

students answered it orally. I explained the procedures they had to do. They had to match

between the pictures and the words appropriately.

At the end of the lesson, I gave a formative test to the students. The purpose was to find

how well the students had mastered the materials. I also wanted to find on what aspect remedial

action was necessary. The test consisted of 10 multiple-choice items. The result of the students’

achievement in the test can be seen on next page.

38

Table 4. The result of the Formative test of Cycle 1

No. Test Code The Right Score %

1. P-1 9 90

2. P-2 10 100

3. P-3 3 30

4. P-4 9 90

5. P-5 4 40

6. P-6 4 40

7. P-7 4 40

8. P-8 4 40

9. P-9 6 60

10. P-10 10 100

11. P-11 9 90

12. P-12 10 100

13. P-13 9 90

14. P-14 10 100

15. P-15 9 90

16. P-16 7 70

17. P-17 10 100

18. P-18 10 100

19. P-19 4 40

20. P-20 10 100

21. P-21 4 40

39

22. P-22 8 80

23. P-23 9 90

24. P-24 6 60

25. P-25 3 30

26. P-26 9 90

27. P-27 4 40

28. P-28 4 40

29. P-29 4 40

30. P-30 9 90

31. P-31 4 40

32. P-32 10 100

33. P-33 9 90

34. P-34 9 90

35. P-35 7 70

36. P-36 3 30

37. P-37 9 90

38. P-38 8 80

∑ = 38 ∑ = 270 ∑ = 2700

The average of the students’ result = The total number of the percentage The number of the students

= 2700% 38

= 71.05%.

40

The average of the students’ test result was 71.05%. It was higher than the Department of

National Education’s criterion of assessment. So it was proved to be successful.

The score analysis of the students’ achievement in the formative test of cycle 1 also can

be seen in the diagram as follows.

The diagram above showed that there was an improvement in the test which was

conducted. Most of the students could answer the questions correctly. The average score in this

test was much higher than the pre-test and higher than the standard score. Unfortunately, there

were twenty students that could not answer items number (3) correctly. It meant that some

students’ scores still under the standard given even their score had improved.

During the teaching and learning processes, I asked the English teacher to supervise me

and fill out the field notes sheet. She observed four matters as follows.

Figure 4.1 The result of the Formative test of Cycle 1

41

(1) The Class Situation

The situation of the class was quite conducive. I asked the students not to be afraid of

me. Soon they could enjoy the time, although an atmosphere of tension still filled the

class.

(2) The Participation of the students

The students’ enthusiasm had increased since the first meeting. Although there were

some students who still looked tired, but there was no more student bothering others.

Every time I asked a question to the students, they responded quickly. Some students

did not seriously follow me when practicing look and say technique. They need to

adapt to the new method I offered.

(3) The Implementation of Look and Say Technique

The implementation of look and say technique in cycle 1 could be said quite working

regarding to the students’ result on the formative test. The situation of the class

became more conducive than the first meeting (Pre-test). The students started up

actively to interact with the teacher (I). The first text I used did not contain very

difficult words so it was relatively easy to be understood.

(4) The Condition of Reading Ability of the Students

Looking at the students’ result on the formative test, it could be concluded that the

reading ability of the students had increased, although it was not very significant.

4.2.3 The Analysis of Cycle 2

After the activities of cycle 1 had been completed, the next activity was starting cycle 2. Cycle 2

began on Friday, 3 June 2011. It was also followed by 38 students. Again, Mrs. Santi supervised

me during the activities. I still utilized two languages: English and Indonesian.

42

At the beginning, I made a review about the last meeting. I asked them whether they

enjoyed it or not. They spontaneously answered ‘yes’ in unison. I informed the students that I

would give them another text entitled ‘Occupations’.

I read the text of ‘Occupations’ sentence by sentence, and the students repeated it. Then

in the next session the students were doing the same activities like in cycle 1. I gave some clues

to the students, and we were playing the game. The game was named Pictures-Board game. I

read the role of the game and they did it based on the role.

I drilled some words and asked the students to repeat after me. I asked the students to

read the text of ‘Occupations’ in Indonesian, sentence by sentence. Then I conducted a formative

test in the form of 10 multiple-choice items. The result of the test can be seen as follows.

Table 5. The result of the Formative test of Cycle 2

No. Test Code The Right Score %

1. P-1 10 100

2. P-2 10 100

3. P-3 6 60

4. P-4 9 90

5. P-5 5 50

6. P-6 5 50

7. P-7 9 90

8. P-8 6 60

9. P-9 9 90

10. P-10 10 100

11. P-11 9 90

43

12. P-12 10 100

13. P-13 9 90

14. P-14 10 100

15. P-15 10 100

16. P-16 10 100

17. P-17 10 10

18. P-18 10 10

19. P-19 8 80

20. P-20 10 100

21. P-21 8 80

22. P-22 10 100

23. P-23 10 100

24. P-24 8 80

25. P-25 5 50

26. P-26 10 100

27. P-27 10 100

28. P-28 9 90

29. P-29 9 90

30. P-30 10 100

31. P-31 5 50

32. P-32 10 100

33. P-33 10 100

34. P-34 9 90

44

35. P-35 8 80

36. P-36 5 50

37. P-37 10 100

38. P-38 10 100

∑ = 38 ∑ = 331 ∑ = 3130

The average of the students’ result = The total number of the percentage The number of the students

= 3130% 38

= 82.36%

The average achievement of the students in the formative test of cycle 2 was 82.36%.

According to the criterion of assessment provided by National Education Department, 82.36%

was said to be successful. Besides, when I compared the result of this test with the previous test,

it was clear that the result was higher than before. Therefore, it could be concluded that cycle 2

was successful.

The score analysis of the students’ achievement in the formative test of cycle 2 also can

be seen in the diagram as follows.

Figure 4.2 The result of the Formative Test of Cycle 2

45

The diagram above showed the result of the formative test of cycle 2 was amazing. It

showed that there was a significant improvement in this test. Most of the students could answer

correctly in every item of the test. The average score of the students was increased from the

result of cycle one. After being treated for two cycles, most of them were better in reading.

Like in cycle 1, Mrs. Santi, the English teacher, accompanied me during the activities of

cycle 2. I asked her to fill out the field notes sheet again. From the notes she wrote, I could

describe the result of observation as follows.

(1) The Class Situation

The situation in the class was even more conducive than in cycle 1. The students were not

afraid of me anymore and they could enjoy the processes. There was a cheerful

atmosphere when the students played the pictures-board game.

(2) The Participation of the Students

Most of the students paid attention fully to what I said. It showed how enthusiastic they

were in following the lesson. There was no more sleepy student. Everyone spoke up

loudly and looked very happy.

(3) The Implementation of Look and Say Technique

The second text, ‘Occupation’, has a higher level of difficulty than the first text, ‘The

Zoo’. But because of the interesting teaching aids and their enthusiasm, the students

could understand the text well. The look and say technique helped the students to reduce

stress they feel in studying English. The implementation of this technique in cycle 2

could be said successful with reference to the students’ result on formative test.

46

(4) The Condition of Reading Ability of the Students

The students could sustain their concentration in reading to the written text. Concerning

the students’ result on the formative test, it could be seen that the reading ability of the

students had risen up. Most of the students carried out the command correctly after

reading it only once.

4.2.4 Result of the Post-test

The post-test or final test was held on Saturday, 4 June 2011. All of the students took the test. It

was the same as the pre-test that consisted of 25 multiple-choice items. The purpose of the post-

test was to compare the difference of the results of the students between before and after using

look and say technique. The result presented as follows.

Table 6. The Result of the Post-test

No. Test Code The Right Score %

1. P-1 24 96

2. P-2 24 96

3. P-3 18 72

4. P-4 22 88

5. P-5 20 80

6. P-6 19 76

7. P-7 18 72

8. P-8 18 72

9. P-9 19 76

10. P-10 22 88

47

11. P-11 19 76

12. P-12 24 96

13. P-13 24 96

14. P-14 25 100

15. P-15 21 84

16. P-16 23 92

17. P-17 25 100

18. P-18 23 92

19. P-19 17 68

20. P-20 25 100

21. P-21 20 80

22. P-22 18 72

23. P-23 21 84

24. P-24 24 96

25. P-25 18 72

26. P-26 25 100

27. P-27 21 84

28. P-28 21 84

29. P-29 18 72

30. P-30 23 92

31. P-31 18 72

32. P-32 18 72

33. P-33 17 68

48

34. P-34 25 100

35. P-35 21 84

36. P-36 18 72

37. P-37 20 80

38. P-38 21 84

∑ = 38 ∑ = 797 ∑ = 3188

The result of the data analysis above showed that:

The mean of the students’ result = The total number of the percentage The number of the students

= 3188% 38

= 83.89%

The median of the students’ result =

=

= 84

The mood of the students’ result = 72 (Score that appeared frequently)

The lowest score of the students’ result = 68

The highest score of the students’ result = 100

The achievement of the post-test was 83.89%. Comparing the result to the criterion of

assessment of National Education Department, it could be concluded that teaching and learning

process was successful.

49

4.3 Improvement of the Students’ Reading Skill In conducting this action research, the four tests were distributed in order to know the students’

ability in reading. The result of each test showed improvements of the students’ ability in

reading. The percentages of the tests were showed in the diagram next page.

The diagram above showed that there was an improvement in every test which was

conducted. The average score of the pre-test was only 58.10. It was lower than the criterion of

the assessment from the minimal standard of the school that was 65. The students had problems

in every aspect of reading, including fluency, pronunciation, content, and grammar. Many of

them were poor in vocabulary. In cycle one test, there was much improvement. The average

score was 71.05 which meant it was much higher than the pre-test and higher than the standard

score. It increased 12.95 point from the pre-test. In this test, the students could understand some

vocabulary and the content of the text. After knowing the result of cycle one, I found that some

students’ scores still under the standard given even their score had improved. Therefore, I

conducted the cycle two. In the end of cycle two, I distributed a test. The result was amazing.

The average was 82.36 or increased 11.31 from the result of cycle one. After being treated for

two cycles, most of them were better in reading. The last test was post-test. In this test, the

average score was 83.89 or increased 25.79 compared to pre-test.

Figure 4.3 Improvement of the Students’ Reading Skill from Pre-Test to Post-test

50

4.4 The Overall Analysis

The average score from the pre-test to the post-test is presented below.

Pre-test Cycle 1 Cycle 2 Post-test

58.10% 71.05% 82.36% 83.89%

Mean of the whole test:

= 73.85%

The data showed that there was an improvement of reading skill. As regards the

percentage in the pre-test, the students achieved 58.1%. In cycle 1 they got 71.05%, whereas in

cycle 2 they obtained 82.36%. In the last test, the post-test, they successfully reached 83.89%.

The improvement of the students’ reading skill proved that look and say was effective to

be used in teaching reading to elementary school students.

51

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

This chapter presents conclusions of the study based on the result of the study and suggestions

for the students, teachers, and next researchers.

5.1 Conclusions

After conducting the research, I can conclude that look and say was effective as a technique in

teaching reading to elementary school students. The students were interested in activities by

using look and say technique in learning reading. This technique improved the reading skill of

the fourth grade students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal in the academic year of 2010/2011.

It could be drawn from the results of the formative test of cycle 1, the formative test of cycle 2,

and the post-test. The average score of the pre-test was 58.1%. After the activities by using look

and say were given, in cycle 1, the average score of the test was 71.05%. It was higher than the

result of the pre-test or it increased 12.95. Meanwhile, in cycle 2 the average score increased to

82.36%. It was 11.31 higher than the result of cycle 1. The average score of the post-test was

83.89%. So it totally increased 25.79, which was higher than the pre-test.

Furthermore, it can also be concluded that the students like to learn reading by using look

and say technique. It was drawn from the field notes which were filled by the English teacher.

The field notes showed that the students were in interested in activities by using look and say

technique to improve their reading skill. Moreover, based on the analysis of the questionnaire,

the students choose learning English by using look and say technique because it was enjoyable,

colorful, and lively.

52

5.2 Suggestions

Look and say is only an alternative technique in teaching reading. There are still so many

techniques which can be used. Using look and say as a technique in teaching reading helps the

teacher and gives much opportunity for the students to be more active in the teaching and

learning process.

There are some suggestions I want to offer as follows.

(1) For the students: they should regularly practice to read to English by reading to other

written text;

(2) For teachers: look and say is an interesting technique to teach reading to children. That is

why they should use it as one of the techniques in teaching reading to make students

more motivated to read to English because children need enjoyable and lively learning

experiences;

(3) There are still so many techniques to introduce written text to children that not have been

tried yet. I suggest that the next researcher conduct deeper research by developing other

techniques such phonics that is based on letters and sounds.

Finally, I hope that the results of this research can be useful for the readers. The readers

may have more information about the use of look and say as a technique in teaching reading to

elementary school students. This research can be one of the references for the next researchers in

conducting other researches.

53

54

The Name List of the Students

No. Student’s Name Test Code

1. Agung Hasan Mulyantoro

P-1

2. Ananda Nurjanatul Istiqomah

P-2

3. Rizki Aji Andika

P-3

4. Rudi Alwan

P-4

5. Mualimin

P-5

6. Bagus Setiawan

P-6

7. M. Rizki Maulana

P-7

8. Masduki Baihaki

P-8

9. M. Riski Luki Saputra

P-9

10. Adela Kalviana Dewi

P-10

11. Agus Saputra

P-11

12. A. Dimas Riski Pangestu

P-12

13. A. Reynaldy Saputra

P-13

14. Dimas Asmara Wibowo

P-14

15. Dinda Nur Fadila

P-15

16. Dwi Saputra

P-16

17. Harum Putri Asyifa

P-17

18. Huni Andini

P-18

19. Iin Febrianti

P-19

55

20. Khanifatul Mila

P-20

21. M. Ade Imam Fauzi

P-21

22. Meike Lutfatul Nafsiah

P-22

23. Mayang Sari Dwi Saputri

P-23

24. M. Alwi Mufti Aji

P-24

25. M. Fahmi

P-25

26. M. Febriano Hagi

P-26

27. M. Ilham Sarur Romadhon

P-27

28. M. Irfan Rifai

P-28

29. M. Sahrul Mubin

P-29

30. Nurul Ilmi

P-30

31. Sarif Triana

P-31

32. Satria Wibowo

P-32

33. Siti Nurul Anisa

P-33

34. Tamala Widiastuti

P-34

35. M. Abdy Pratama

P-35

36. Yusi Kartika Dewi

P-36

37. Nadia Lestari

P-37

38. Fadlur Rohman

P-38

56

LESSON PLAN

School : SD Negeri kambangan 1

Subject : English

Year/ Semester : IV (fourth)/ II

Standard Competence : 7. Memahami tulisan bahasa Inggris sangat sederhana dalam

konteks kelas.

Basic Competence : 7.2 Memahami kalimat dan pesan tertulis sangat sederhana

Indicator : To identify the information in very simple text.

Text Type : Transactional

Theme : Animals

Skill : Reading

Time allotment : 2 x 35 minutes

1. Objectives

By the end of the lesson the students are able to:

a. Identify the information in the form of simple text.

b. Answer the questions related to the text.

2. Materials

a. A text about animals.

The Zoo

Yudi goes to the zoo. The zoo has many kinds of animals. Yudi sees

monkeys, snakes, giraffes, elephants, birds, and a lion. Monkeys like to

eat banana and seeds. Snakes like to eat frog and its body is long.

57

Giraffes have a long neck. Elephants have large ears and a long trunk. And

birds can fly in the sky.

Yudi likes the lion the best. He hears the lion roars. The roar is so

loud. Yudi has to cover his ears. Yudi is not afraid of the lion. The lion is

in a cage.

b. Basic expressions:

Attention, please!

Raise your hand, please!

Look at the picture, please!

Say it loudly, please!

Come forward, please!

3. Teaching Method: Look and Say technique.

4. Teaching and learning activities

a. BKOF

1) Teacher opens the lesson by greeting students.

2) Teacher checks the roll.

3) Teacher asks the students whether they like animals or not.

4) Teacher shows flashcards about animals.

b. MOT

1) Teacher reads the text.

2) Teacher explains the key words of the text.

3) Teacher asks students to repeat after her.

4) Teacher read the text again and practices look and say technique to convey the

whole content of the text.

c. JCOT

1) Teacher shows the flashcards and asks the students to look and say it loudly.

2) Teacher asks students to match between the pictures on the blackboard and the

written words appropriately.

58

d. ICOT

1) Teacher gives a formative test to the students.

5. Resources

a. Intisari Bahasa Inggris by Purwantoro.

b. Flash cards.

c. Pictures.

d. Written words.

Approved by: ..................................

Head Master English Teacher

NIP. NIP.

59

LESSON PLAN

School : SD Negeri kambangan 1

Subject : English

Year/ Semester : IV (fourth)/ II

Standard Competence : 7. Memahami tulisan bahasa Inggris sangat sederhana dalam

konteks kelas.

Basic Competence : 7.2 Memahami kalimat dan pesan tertulis sangat sederhana

Indicator : To identify the information in very simple text.

Text Type : Transactional

Theme : Occupations

Skill : Reading

Time allotment : 2 x 35 minutes

6. Objectives

By the end of the lesson the students are able to:

c. Identify the information in the form of simple text.

d. Answer the questions related to the text.

7. Materials

c. A text about occupations.

Occupations

There are many kinds of occupations that everyone need. The teacher is

very important because she can makes other people clever. The doctor

makes other people health. The nurse takes care about sick people. The

farmer plants the rice on the field rice. The fisherman works on the sea

60

to catch fish. The pilot flies the plane. And police protects people from

criminals. So occupation or job are very various.

d. Vocabulary related to the theme:

Occupations

teacher

doctor

nurse

farmer

fisherman

pilot

police

job

e. Basic expressions:

Attention, please!

Look at the picture, please!

Stand up, please!

Sit down, please!

8. Teaching Method: Look and Say technique.

9. Teaching and learning activities:

a. BKOF

1) Teacher opens the lesson by greeting students.

2) Teacher checks the roll.

3) Teacher makes a review about the last meeting.

b. MOT

1) Teacher reads the text

2) Teacher explains the key words of the text.

3) Teacher asks students to repeat after her.

4) Teacher reads the text again and practices look and say technique to convey the

whole content of the text.

61

c. JCOT

1) Teacher shows the flashcards and asks the students to look and say it loudly.

2) Teacher asks students to match between the pictures on the blackboard and the

written sentences appropriately.

3) Teacher drills some vocabulary and asks students to repeat after her.

4) Teacher asks students to read the text in Indonesian sentence by sentence.

d. ICOT

1) Teacher gives formative test to the students.

10. Resources

e. Intisari Bahasa Inggris by Purwantoro.

f. Flash cards.

g. Pictures.

h. Written sentences.

Approved by: ..................................

Head Master English Teacher

NIP. NIP.

62

LESSON PLAN

School : SD Negeri kambangan 1

Subject : English

Year/ Semester : IV (fourth)/ II

Standard Competence : 7. Memahami tulisan bahasa Inggris sangat sederhana dalam

konteks kelas.

Basic Competence : 7.2 Memahami kalimat dan pesan tertulis sangat sederhana

Indicator : To identify the information in very simple text.

Text Type : Transactional

Theme : Animals and Occupations

Skill : Reading

Time allotment : 2 x 35 minutes

11. Objectives

By the end of the lesson the students are able to:

e. Identify the information in the form of simple text.

f. Answer the questions related to the text.

12. Materials: A review of previous materials.

13. Teaching method: Look and Say technique.

14. Teaching and learning activities

a. BKOF

1) Teacher opens the lesson by greeting students.

2) Teacher checks the roll.

3) Teacher asks the students to give opinion about the previous materials.

63

b. MOT

1) Teacher reads the written texts.

2) Teacher explain the key words of the text.

c. JCOT

1) Teacher and students read the text together with good pronunciation.

d. ICOT

1) Teacher gives a post-test to the students.

2) Teacher distributes questionnaire to the students.

15. Resources: written texts.

Approved by: ......................................

Head Master English Teacher

NIP. NIP.

64

The Zoo

Yudi goes to the zoo. The zoo has many kinds of animals.

Yudi sees monkeys, snakes, giraffes, elephants, birds, and a

lion. Monkeys like to eat banana and seeds. Snakes like to eat

frog and its body is long. Giraffes have a long neck. Elephants

have large ears and a long trunk. And birds can fly in the sky.

Yudi likes the lion the best. He hears the lion roars. The

roar is so loud. Yudi has to cover his ears. Yudi is not afraid of

the lion. The lion is in a cage.

65

Occupations

There are many kinds of occupations that everyone need.

The teacher is very important because she can makes other

people clever. The doctor makes other people health. The

nurse takes care about sick people. The farmer plants the rice

on the field rice. The fisherman works on the sea to catch

fish. The pilot flies the plane. And police protects people from

criminals. So occupation or job are very various.

66

PRE TEST

READING TEST

NAME :

CLASS : IV (Four)

Choose the correct answer by crossing a, b, c, or d!

1. What am I?

I can swim in the water.

a. Bird c. Fish

b. Cat d. Frog

2. I see an .... in the zoo.

a. Bird c. Lion

b. Elephant d. Deer

3. This is my ....

a. Duck c. Cat

b. Hen d. Cock

67

4. It is my ....

a. Sheep c. Horse

b. Cow d. Goat

5. Agnes has a white ....

a. Duck c. Bird

b. Hen d. Cat

6. What’s animal is this?

This is a ....

a. Giraffe c. Hen

b. Lion d. Horse

7. .... is pet animal.

a. Cat c. Lion

b. Tiger d. Crocodile

8. I want to buy a bird in the ....

a. Bookshop c. Pet shop

b. Grocery d. Butcher

68

9. I have ivory, long nose and big ear. I am a ....

a. Dog c. Goat

b. Rabbit d. Elephant

10. I will ride a ....

a. Horse c. Pigeon

b. Pig d. Goat

11. I can jump. I live in the land, but I can live in the water too.

I am a ....

a. Bird c. Goat

b. Frog d. Chicken

12. The .... has a long body.

It is a wild animal.

a. Snake c. Cat

b. Tiger d. Scorpion

13. It is from Sumatra.

This animal is ....

a. Cat c. Ant

b. Spider d. Tiger

69

14. Have you got a horse? Yes ....

a. She has c. I have

b. He has d. They have

15. A goat eats ....

a. Bones c. Mouse

b. Grass d. Bread

16. Monkey eats ....

a. Corn c. Banana

b. Orange d. Mango

17. Is this a bird? .... It is a butterfly.

a. Yes, it is c. No, it is not

b. Yes, it is not d. No, it is

70

18. She is an assistant of the doctor.

She is a ....

a. Policewoman c. Doctor

b. Nurse d. Teacher

19. He can cut your hair. He is a ....

a. Engineer c. Nurse

b. Barber d. Soldier

20. Lala is studying English in the classroom. She is a ....

a. Student c. Actress

b. Singer d. Headmaster

21. If you are sick, you go to the ....

a. Teacher c. Soldier

b. Doctor d. Farmer

22. She is teaching in classroom.

She is a ....

a. Teacher c. Nurse

b. Doctor d. Farmer

71

23. A nurse work at a .....

a. Library c. Office

b. School d. Hospital

24. Mr. Crap brings a car. He is a ....

a. Driver c. Barber

b. Teacher d. Pilot

25. Mr. Robert is working. He makes table, chairs, and cupboard.

He is a ....

a. Gardener c. Baker

b. Carpenter d. Barber

72

FORMATIVE TEST OF CYCLE I

READING TEST

NAME :

CLASS : IV (Four)

Choose the correct answer by crossing a, b, c, or d!

1. Where does Yudi go?

He goes to the ....

a. Bank

b. Zoo

c. Garden

d. Hospital

2. The zoo has many kinds of ....

a. Animals

b. Flowers

c. Fruits

d. Vegetables

3. Yudi does not see .... in the zoo.

a. Monkeys

b. Birds

c. Fish

d. Elephants

73

4. My body is long. I like to eat frog.

I am a ....

a. Snake

b. Bird

c. Giraffe

d. Monkey

5. I have a long neck. I am a ....

a. Snake

b. Bird

c. Giraffe

d. Monkey

6. I have large ears and a long trunk.

I am a ....

a. Snake

b. Lion

c. Fish

d. Elephant

7. I like to eat banana and seeds.

I am a ....

a. Monkey

b. Cat

c. Horse

d. Bird

74

8. I can fly in the sky.

I am a ....

a. Monkey

b. Cat

c. Horse

d. Bird

9. What does Yudi like the best?

a. Lion

b. Monkey

c. Snake

d. Bird

10. Where is the lion?

The lion is in a ....

a. forest

b. cage

c. field

d. jungle

75

FORMATIVE TEST OF CYCLE II

READING TEST

NAME :

CLASS : IV (Four)

Choose the correct answer by crossing a, b, c, or d!

1. He can makes other people clever.

He is a ....

a. Teacher c. Policeman

b. Nurse d. Farmer

2. He protects people from criminal.

He is a ....

a. Teacher c. Policeman

b. Doctor d. Farmer

3. She take cares the patience.

She is a ....

a. Soldier c. Dentist

b. Nurse d. Pilot

4. He makes other people health.

He is a ....

a. Teacher c. Policeman

b. Doctor d. Farmer

5. He plants the rice on the field rice.

He is a ....

a. Engineer c. Farmer

b. Breeder d. Doctor

6. He works on the sea to catch fish.

He is a ....

a. Soldier c. Farmer

b. Breeder d. Fisherman

7. He flies the plane.

He is a ....

a. Policeman c. Farmer

b. Pilot d. Fisherman

76

8. She is an assistant of the doctor.

She is a ....

a. Nurse c. Police woman

b. Midwife d. Librarian

9. She is teaching in classroom.

She is a ....

a. Nurse c. Midwife

b. Teacher d. Librarian

10. My grandfather is in the field rice.

He is a ....

a. Doctor c. Pilot

b. Farmer d. Fisherman

77

POST TEST

READING TEST

NAME :

CLASS : IV (Four)

Choose the correct answer by crossing a, b, c, or d!

26. What am I?

I can swim in the water.

c. Bird c. Fish

d. Cat d. Frog

27. I see an .... in the zoo.

c. Bird c. Lion

d. Elephant d. Deer

28. This is my ....

c. Duck c. Cat

d. Hen d. Cock

29. It is my ....

c. Sheep c. Horse

d. Cow d. Goat

30. Agnes has a white ....

c. Duck c. Bird

d. Hen d. Cat

31. What’s animal is this?

This is a ....

c. Giraffe c. Hen

d. Lion d. Horse

78

32. .... is pet animal.

c. Cat c. Lion

d. Tiger d. Crocodile

33. I want to buy a bird in the ....

c. Bookshop c. Pet shop

d. Grocery d. Butcher

34. I have ivory, long nose and big ear. I

am a ....

c. Dog c. Goat

d. Rabbit d. Elephant

35. I will ride a ....

c. Horse c. Pigeon

d. Pig d. Goat

36. I can jump. I live in

the land, but I can live in the water

too.

I am a ....

c. Bird c. Goat

d. Frog d. Chicken

37. The .... has a long

body.

It is a wild animal.

c. Snake c. Cat

d. Tiger d. Scorpion

38. It is from Sumatra.

This animal is ....

c. Cat c. Ant

d. Spider d. Tiger

39. Have you got a

horse? Yes ....

c. She has c. I have

d. He has d. They have

79

40. A goat eats ....

c. Bones c. Mouse

d. Grass d. Bread

41. Monkey eats ....

c. Corn c. Banana

d. Orange d. Mango

42. Is this a bird? .... It is

a butterfly.

c. Yes, it is c. No, it is not

d. Yes, it is not d. No, it is

43. She is an assistant of

the doctor.

She is a ....

c. Policewoman c. Doctor

d. Nurse d. Teacher

44. He can cut your hair. He is a ....

c. Engineer c. Nurse

d. Barber d. Soldier

45. Lala is studying English in the

classroom. She is a ....

c. Student c. Actress

d. Singer d. Headmaster

46. If you are sick, you

go to the ....

c. Teacher c. Soldier

d. Doctor d. Farmer

47. She is teaching in

classroom.

She is a ....

c. Teacher c. Nurse

d. Doctor d. Farmer

80

48. A nurse work at a .....

c. Library c. Office

d. School d. Hospital

49. Mr. Crap brings a car. He is a ....

c. Driver c. Barber

d. Teacher d. Pilot

50. Mr. Robert is working. He makes table, chairs, and cupboard.

He is a ....

c. Gardener c. Baker

d. Carpenter d. Barber

Score Analysis of the Pre-test

No Students Code

Score Per Item Total Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

1. P-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 20 2. P-2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 19 3. P-3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 14 4. P-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 16 5. P-5 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 6. P-6 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 10 7. P-7 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 10 8. P-8 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 10 9. P-9 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 14

10. P-10 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 13 11. P-11 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 12. P-12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 18 13. P-13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 17 14. P-14 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 21 15. P-15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 15 16. P-16 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 14 17. P-17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 24 18. P-18 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 15 19. P-19 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 14 20. P-20 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 21 21. P-21 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 22. P-22 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 9 23. P-23 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 14 24. P-24 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 18 25. P-25 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 26. P-26 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 18 27. P-27 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 17 28. P-28 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 13 29. P-29 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13 30. P-30 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 15 31. P-31 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 18 32. P-32 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 14 33. P-33 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 34. P-34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 20 35. P-35 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 19 36. P-36 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 37. P-37 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 14 38. P-38 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 ∑ 38 38 28 35 31 31 33 11 6 8 33 18 34 32 17 12 34 10 14 17 16 35 22 10 20 7 552

81

82

SCORE ANALYSIS OF THE FORMATIVE TEST OF CYCLE 1

No Students Code

Score Per Item Total Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1. P-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9 2. P-2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 3. P-3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 4. P-4 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 5. P-5 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 6. P-6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 7. P-7 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 8. P-8 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 9. P-9 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 6

10. P-10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 11. P-11 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 12. P-12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 13. P-13 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9 14. P-14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 15. P-15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9 16. P-16 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7 17. P-17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 18. P-18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 19. P-19 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 20. P-20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 21. P-21 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 22. P-22 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8 23. P-23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9 24. P-24 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 6 25. P-25 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 26. P-26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9 27. P-27 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 4 28. P-28 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 29. P-29 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 30. P-30 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 31. P-31 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 32. P-32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 33. P-33 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 34. P-34 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 35. P-35 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 7 36. P-36 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 37. P-37 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9 38. P-38 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 8 ∑ 38 37 37 16 20 22 24 30 30 31 23 270

83

SCORE ANALYSIS OF THE FORMATIVE TEST OF CYCLE 2

No Students Code

Score Per item Total Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1. P-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 2. P-2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 3. P-3 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 6 4. P-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 9 5. P-5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 5 6. P-6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 5 7. P-7 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 8. P-8 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 6 9. P-9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 9

10. P-10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 11. P-11 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 12. P-12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 13. P-13 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9 14. P-14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 15. P-15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 16. P-16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 17. P-17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 18. P-18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 19. P-19 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8 20. P-20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 21. P-21 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 8 22. P-22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 23. P-23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 24. P-24 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 25. P-25 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 5 26. P-26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 27. P-27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 28. P-28 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 29. P-29 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 30. P-30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 31. P-31 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 5 32. P-32 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 33. P-33 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 34. P-34 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 35. P-35 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 8 36. P-36 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 5 37. P-37 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 38. P-38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 ∑ 38 34 35 26 32 33 33 36 36 34 31 331

Score Analysis of the Post-test

No Students Code

Score Per Item Total Score 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

1. P-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 24 2. P-2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 24 3. P-3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 18 4. P-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 22 5. P-5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 20 6. P-6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 19 7. P-7 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 18 8. P-8 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 18 9. P-9 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 19 10. P-10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 22 11. P-11 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 19 12. P-12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 24 13. P-13 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 24 14. P-14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 15. P-15 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 16. P-16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 17. P-17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 18. P-18 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 19. P-19 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 17 20. P-20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 21. P-21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 20 22. P-22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 18 23. P-23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 21 24. P-24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 24 25. P-25 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 18 26. P-26 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 27. P-27 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 21 28. P-28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 21 29. P-29 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 18 30. P-30 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 23 31. P-31 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 18 32. P-32 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 18 33. P-33 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 17 34. P-34 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 35. P-35 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 21 36. P-36 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 18 37. P-37 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 38. P-38 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 21 ∑ 38 38 37 38 34 37 33 35 28 30 33 28 34 38 22 23 36 25 34 25 28 37 32 24 33 35 797

84

85

QUESTIONNAIRE

The Use of Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching Reading

to Elementary School Students

(The Case of the Fourth Grade Students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1 Tegal

in the Academic Year of 2008/2009)

Nama :

No Absen :

Berilah tanda check (√) pada kolom respon yang kamu anggap benar!

No Pertanyaan Respon

Ya Tidak

1. Apakah kamu menyukai pelajaran bahasa Inggris?

2. Menurut kamu apakah pelajaran bahasa Inggris sangat berguna

dalam kehidupan sehari-hari?

3. Apakah kamu menyukai pelajaran membaca bahasa Inggris?

4. Menurut kamu apakah reading (membaca) itu menyenangkan?

5. Apakah kamu mengalami kesulitan dalam membaca teks

bahasa Inggris?

86

6. Apakah kamu menyukai teknik look and say (lihat dan

ucapkan) yang telah diberikan?

7. Apakah dengan menggunakan teknik look and say (melihat

dan mengucapkan) dapat membantu kamu dalam pelajaran

reading (membaca)?

8. Menurut kamu apakah cara pengajaran yang telah diberikan

dapat mempermudah kamu dalam membaca dan memahami

teks berbahasa Inggris?

9. Apakah kegiatan seperti ini menambah kebiasaan kamu dalam

belajar bahasa Inggris?

10. Apakah kegiatan ini perlu dilakukan terus menerus?

87

FIELD NOTES

The Use of Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching Reading

to Elementary School Students

(The Case of the Fourth Grade Students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1 Tegal

in the Academic Year of 2010/2011)

Meeting : Second Meeting

Date : 2 June 2011

Material : The Zoo

No Questionnaire Scale Comment

Good Enough Bad

1. How is the class situation during

teaching and learning process?

2. How is the students’ attention to the

lesson?

3. How is the implementation of look and

say in teaching learning process?

88

4. How is the material which teacher

explained to the students?

5. How is the interaction between the

students and teacher?

6. How is the students’ reading ability after

using look and say in teaching and

learning process?

Kambangan , ..............................

Observer,

.....................................................

89

FIELD NOTES

The Use of Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching Reading

to Elementary School Students

(The Case of the Fourth Grade Students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1 Tegal

in the Academic Year of 2010/2011)

Meeting : Third Meeting

Date : 3 June 2011

Material : Occupations

No Questionnaire Scale Comment

Good Enough Bad

1. How is the class situation during

teaching and learning process?

2. How is the students’ attention to the

lesson?

3. How is the implementation of look and

say in teaching learning process?

90

4. How is the material which teacher

explained to the students?

5. How is the interaction between the

students and teacher?

6. How is the students’ reading ability after

using look and say in teaching and

learning process?

Kambangan , ..............................

Observer,

.....................................................

91

DOCUMENTATIONS

92

93

94

REFERENCES

Linse, Caroline T. 2006. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Hornby , A.S. 1995. Oxford Advance Learners Dictionary (5th Ed. by J. Crowther). London: Oxford University Press.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Hidayati, Rizkiana. 2009. The Use of Miming Stories as a Technique in Teaching Listening to Elementary School Students (The Case of Study of the Fifth Grade Students of SD Negeri 1 Procot, Tegal in the Academic Year of 2008/2009). A Final project. Semarang State University: English Department.

Scott, Wendy A. and Lisbeth H. Ytreberg. 1990. Teaching English to Children. New York: Longman, Inc.

Slattery, Mary and Jane Willis. 2001. English for Primary Teachers. London: Oxford University Press.

Johnson, Donna M. 1993. Approaches to Research in Second Language Learning. New York: Longman.

Mujiyanto, Y. 2007. Petunjuk Penulisan Skripsi. Semarang: English Department of UNNES Press

Subyantoro. 2007. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Semarang: Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Press.

Brown, H.D. 2004. Language Assesment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pierson Education, Inc.

Mc Niff, J. 1992. Action Research: Principles and Practice. New York: Macmillan Education Ltd.

Hartman R. 2001. Teaching and Researching Lexicography Applied Linguistic in Action. London: Longman.

Harris, David, P. 1969. Teaching English as a Second Language. USA: Mc. Graw Hill, Inc.

Depdikbud Provinsi Jawa Tengah (2005), Kurikulum Tahun 2004: Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris untuk Sekolah Dasar/ Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Semarang.

95

Purwantoro and M. Ikhsan. 2007. Intisari Bahasa Inggris. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Widyartanti, Yunita. 2008. The Use of Story Reading Activities as a Means of Developing Vocabulary in Elementary School (The Case of the Fifth Grade Students of SD Wangunrejo 01 Pati in the Academic Year of 2007/2008). A Final Project. Semarang State University: English Department.

Anggraeni, Resty. 2009. Storytelling as a Technique in Teaching Reading at Elementary School (A Case of Fifth Year Students of SDN Wonosekar in the Academic Year of 2008/2009). A Final Project. Semarang State University: English Department.

Hartini, Kusni. 2008. The Use of Fables to Improve the Students’ Reading Comprehension (A Case of the Year Eight Students of SMP Negeri 2 Juwana in the Academic Year 2007/2008). A Final Project. Semarang State University: English Department.

Mardiana, Anita. 2007. Teaching Simple Noun Phrases Using Quartet Cards to the Fifth Graders of SD 1 Mlati Kidul Kudus in the Academic Year of 2006/2007. A Final Project. Semarang State University: English Department.

Look and Say Method. Outline at: http://teachingtreasures.comau/homeschool/reading-methods/lookandsay.html [accessed 15/07/2010]