„the uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will...
DESCRIPTION
Neutrinoless Double Beta- Decay Probability TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009TRANSCRIPT
„The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle
obstacle to answering some basic questions about neutrinos.“
Bahcall et al. Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 033012
Theoretical Status of the Double Beta Decay
Amand Faessler, TuebingenTAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Oνββ-Decay (forbidden in Standard Model)
only for massive Majorana Neutrinos ν = νc
P
P
n n
Left
Left
ν Phase Space106 x 2νββ
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Neutrinoless Double Beta-
Decay Probability
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
QRPA Tuebingen 2008
QRPA and RQRPA (Tuebingen) with errors from Basis Size, exp. 2-Neutrino Decay, axial Coupling Constant gA = 1.25 and 1.00
and Short Range Correlations ( UCOM + Jastrow)
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
QRPA Tuebingen 2008
Blue triangles: Shell model of Strassburg and Madrid group only 4 to 5 single nucleon levels
Green Squares IBM2 of Barea and Iachello 2009
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
IBM2 Barea, Iachello 2009QRPA Tuebingen 2008SM Courier et al.
Rodin Saleh Kovalenko Faessler
Petr Vogel
Gutsche
SimkovicTAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Tuebingen Jyväskylä
Shell Model basis: 1f5/2, 2p3/2, 2p1/2, 1g9/2
SM+Spin-Orbit: 1f5/2, 2p3/2, 2p1/2, 1g9/2, 1f7/2, 1g7/2
1f5/2, 2p3/2, 2p1/2, 1g9/2, 1f7/2, 1g7/2, 1d5/2, 1d3/2, 2s1/2
Neutron-Neutron -> Proton-Proton relative
Angular Momentum for the Pair : Neutron x Neutron Proton x Proton
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
IBM Angular Momentum for the Pair : Neutron x Neutron Proton x Proton
0+
2+
Can one distiguish experimentally betweenQuasi-Particle Random Phase
(QRPA) and the Shell Model (SM)?
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
QRPAGT /2 ~ SMGT
QRPA Fermi/5 ~ SMFermihttp://Arxiv.org/abs/0906.1759 Rodin and Faessler: One can measure the Fermi contribution.
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Can one distiguish experimentally betweenQuasi-Particle Random Phase
(QRPA) and the Shell Model (SM) ?
Due to TZ = 2 only the isotensor part of the „Coulomb interaction“ can contribute.
Since the strong Interaction commutes with Isospin, replace „Coulomb“ VC by the total Hamiltonian Htotal.
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Can one distiguish experimentally between QRPA and SM ? Use Closure!
0+ + DIAS 0+
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
0+ Isobaric(i) Analog State
Can one distiguish experimentally between QRPA and SM ?
0+ + DIAS 0+
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
0+ Isobaric Analog State
Can one distiguish experimentally between QRPA and SM ?
(p,n); (3He,3H)(n,p); (d,2p); (3H, 3He)
Overconstraining the 2by adjusting gpp und gA
to -, EC and 2 for 116Cd and 100Mo (Bari+Tuebingen)
-
EC
1+
0+
116Cd 100Mo
0+
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
1+1+
Solid points: Overconstrained results large and small basis.Open circle QRPA 3 basis sets and gA = 1.00.
Only theoretical 1errors.
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Renormalized QRPA 0 Half Lives calculated in TUE with the Bonn CD force and Jastrow
correlations for quenched gA = 1.00; errors from 2 experiments
for <m> = 50 meV 76Ge 76Se T(1/2) [years] = (1.10+-0.13)* 1027
82Se 82Kr T(1/2) [years] = (3.50+-0.42)* 1026
100Mo 100Ru T(1/2) [years] = (3.33+-0.45)* 1026
128Te 128Xe T(1/2) [years] = (7.35+-1.00)* 1027
150Nd 150Sm T(1/2) [years] = (3.55+-0.50)* 1025
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
But 150Nd + 150Sm is deformed!
Kay, Schiffer et al. Phys. Rev. C79 (2009) 021301
Proton removal reactions: v2
76Ge(d,3He)75Ga; 76Se(d,3He)
Proton additon reactions: u2
76Ge(3He,d)77As; 76Se(3He,d)
f7/2
p3/2
p1/2
f5/2
g9/2
28
40
5076
32Ge44
p = 0.10
7634Se42
p= 0.16 Neutron vacancy u2
Proton occupancy v2
Double Beta Decay System 76Ge 76Se.
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Ge – Seexperiment
Se – Geexperiment
Fn
Fp
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Adjutment of the Neutron Levels to reproduce the Occupation of Schiffer et al. from Simkovic, Faessler and Vogel : Phys. Rev. C79(2009) 015502 and also Suhonen and Civitarese: Phys. Lett. B668 (2008) 277
50
40
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Omega
1/2
3/2
5/2
7/29/2
g 9/2
p 1/2
f 5/2
1/2
3/2
5/21/2
1/2
3/2p3/2
Deformation 2
Single neutron energies for N = 42
jN = 28
Deformation affects the occupation Probabilities of neutrons mainly.
Parity < 0; deformed mixed: p1/2, p3/2 ,f5/2> 0: g9/2
exp exp
2 = 0.12 = 0.16
2 = 0.232 = 0.26
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009
Summary: Neutrino Mass from Exp. Klapdor et al. Mod. Phys. Lett.
A21,1547(2006) ; 76Ge T(1/2; 0) = (2.23 +0.44 -0.31) x 1025 years; 6
Theory with R-QRPA and gA = 1.25 (Tuebingen)<m()> = 0.22 [eV] (exp+-0.02;theor+-0.01) Bonn CD, Consistent Brückner Correlations <m()> = 0.24 [eV] (exp+-0.02; theor+-0.01) Argonne, Consistent Brückner Correlations Shell Model 4 to 5 levels (Strassburg + Madrid): <m()> ~ 0.45 [eV] Jastrow CorrelationsTHE END
TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009