„the uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will...

23
„The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some basic questions about neutrinos.“ Bahcall et al. Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 033012 Theoretical Status of the Double Beta Decay Amand Faessler, Tuebingen TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Upload: miles-jenkins

Post on 18-Jan-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Neutrinoless Double Beta- Decay Probability TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

„The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle

obstacle to answering some basic questions about neutrinos.“

Bahcall et al. Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 033012

Theoretical Status of the Double Beta Decay

Amand Faessler, TuebingenTAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Page 2: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Oνββ-Decay (forbidden in Standard Model)

only for massive Majorana Neutrinos ν = νc

P

P

n n

Left

Left

ν Phase Space106 x 2νββ

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Page 3: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Neutrinoless Double Beta-

Decay Probability

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Page 4: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

QRPA Tuebingen 2008

QRPA and RQRPA (Tuebingen) with errors from Basis Size, exp. 2-Neutrino Decay, axial Coupling Constant gA = 1.25 and 1.00

and Short Range Correlations ( UCOM + Jastrow)

Page 5: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

QRPA Tuebingen 2008

Blue triangles: Shell model of Strassburg and Madrid group only 4 to 5 single nucleon levels

Page 6: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Green Squares IBM2 of Barea and Iachello 2009

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

IBM2 Barea, Iachello 2009QRPA Tuebingen 2008SM Courier et al.

Page 7: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Rodin Saleh Kovalenko Faessler

Petr Vogel

Gutsche

SimkovicTAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Page 8: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Tuebingen Jyväskylä

Page 9: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Shell Model basis: 1f5/2, 2p3/2, 2p1/2, 1g9/2

SM+Spin-Orbit: 1f5/2, 2p3/2, 2p1/2, 1g9/2, 1f7/2, 1g7/2

1f5/2, 2p3/2, 2p1/2, 1g9/2, 1f7/2, 1g7/2, 1d5/2, 1d3/2, 2s1/2

Neutron-Neutron -> Proton-Proton relative

Angular Momentum for the Pair : Neutron x Neutron Proton x Proton

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Page 10: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

IBM Angular Momentum for the Pair : Neutron x Neutron Proton x Proton

0+

2+

Page 11: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Can one distiguish experimentally betweenQuasi-Particle Random Phase

(QRPA) and the Shell Model (SM)?

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

QRPAGT /2 ~ SMGT

QRPA Fermi/5 ~ SMFermihttp://Arxiv.org/abs/0906.1759 Rodin and Faessler: One can measure the Fermi contribution.

Page 12: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Can one distiguish experimentally betweenQuasi-Particle Random Phase

(QRPA) and the Shell Model (SM) ?

Due to TZ = 2 only the isotensor part of the „Coulomb interaction“ can contribute.

Since the strong Interaction commutes with Isospin, replace „Coulomb“ VC by the total Hamiltonian Htotal.

Page 13: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Can one distiguish experimentally between QRPA and SM ? Use Closure!

Page 14: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

0+ + DIAS 0+

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

0+ Isobaric(i) Analog State

Can one distiguish experimentally between QRPA and SM ?

Page 15: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

0+ + DIAS 0+

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

0+ Isobaric Analog State

Can one distiguish experimentally between QRPA and SM ?

(p,n); (3He,3H)(n,p); (d,2p); (3H, 3He)

Page 16: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Overconstraining the 2by adjusting gpp und gA

to -, EC and 2 for 116Cd and 100Mo (Bari+Tuebingen)

-

EC

1+

0+

116Cd 100Mo

0+

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

1+1+

Page 17: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Solid points: Overconstrained results large and small basis.Open circle QRPA 3 basis sets and gA = 1.00.

Only theoretical 1errors.

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Page 18: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Renormalized QRPA 0 Half Lives calculated in TUE with the Bonn CD force and Jastrow

correlations for quenched gA = 1.00; errors from 2 experiments

for <m> = 50 meV 76Ge 76Se T(1/2) [years] = (1.10+-0.13)* 1027

82Se 82Kr T(1/2) [years] = (3.50+-0.42)* 1026

100Mo 100Ru T(1/2) [years] = (3.33+-0.45)* 1026

128Te 128Xe T(1/2) [years] = (7.35+-1.00)* 1027

150Nd 150Sm T(1/2) [years] = (3.55+-0.50)* 1025

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

But 150Nd + 150Sm is deformed!

Page 19: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Kay, Schiffer et al. Phys. Rev. C79 (2009) 021301

Proton removal reactions: v2

76Ge(d,3He)75Ga; 76Se(d,3He)

Proton additon reactions: u2

76Ge(3He,d)77As; 76Se(3He,d)

f7/2

p3/2

p1/2

f5/2

g9/2

28

40

5076

32Ge44

p = 0.10

7634Se42

p= 0.16 Neutron vacancy u2

Proton occupancy v2

Double Beta Decay System 76Ge 76Se.

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Ge – Seexperiment

Se – Geexperiment

Fn

Fp

Page 20: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Adjutment of the Neutron Levels to reproduce the Occupation of Schiffer et al. from Simkovic, Faessler and Vogel : Phys. Rev. C79(2009) 015502 and also Suhonen and Civitarese: Phys. Lett. B668 (2008) 277

50

40

Page 21: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Omega

1/2

3/2

5/2

7/29/2

g 9/2

p 1/2

f 5/2

1/2

3/2

5/21/2

1/2

3/2p3/2

Deformation 2

Single neutron energies for N = 42

jN = 28

Page 22: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Deformation affects the occupation Probabilities of neutrons mainly.

Parity < 0; deformed mixed: p1/2, p3/2 ,f5/2> 0: g9/2

exp exp

2 = 0.12 = 0.16

2 = 0.232 = 0.26

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009

Page 23: „The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some

Summary: Neutrino Mass from Exp. Klapdor et al. Mod. Phys. Lett.

A21,1547(2006) ; 76Ge T(1/2; 0) = (2.23 +0.44 -0.31) x 1025 years; 6

Theory with R-QRPA and gA = 1.25 (Tuebingen)<m()> = 0.22 [eV] (exp+-0.02;theor+-0.01) Bonn CD, Consistent Brückner Correlations <m()> = 0.24 [eV] (exp+-0.02; theor+-0.01) Argonne, Consistent Brückner Correlations Shell Model 4 to 5 levels (Strassburg + Madrid): <m()> ~ 0.45 [eV] Jastrow CorrelationsTHE END

TAUP2009, Wednesday, July first 2009