the think quest project

65

Click here to load reader

Upload: esu-helwan

Post on 16-Apr-2017

1.693 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The think quest project

THE THINK QUEST

COMPETITION

Page 2: The think quest project

THE PROBLEM TITLE:

The Risks of Nuclear Reactors

Page 3: The think quest project

TEAM NAME : The Challenger

THE TEAM MEMBERS: Fatma Hanafy Mohammed Hanafy. Marwa Yehya Galal Gad. Naira Tarek Saleh Mohamed Abd Alla . Shaimaa Esam Abd_Elsalam.

THE COACHE’S NAME -:Zeinab Hanafy Mohammed Hanafy.

TEAM WORK

Page 4: The think quest project

4

introduction

Page 5: The think quest project

INTRODUCTION

Page 6: The think quest project

6

NUCLEAR REACTOR

The Definition-:

A nuclear reactor is a device to initiate and control a sustained nuclear chain reaction.

Page 7: The think quest project

7

History:-

The Enrico Fermi and Leo Chilard were the first to:-

1) Built a nuclear reactor at the University of Chicago in 1942.

2) Used the first nuclear reactors in the forties of the twentieth century to generate plutonium [t] of nuclear weapons.

3) Then used the other reactors in the Navy for the conduct of submarines .

Page 8: The think quest project

8

In the mid-fifties of the twentieth century were in the Soviet Union and other Western countries Research on the use of nuclear reactors for non-military purposes.

In 1951, electrical energy produced for the first time from the nuclear-powered generators.

The first reactor generates electricity for commercial purposes was built in Russia in 1954. And began operating the first nuclear reactor to generate electricity in the United States in 1957.

History (cont.):-

Page 9: The think quest project

9

Having created hundreds of reactors in many countries stop built in some countries, including the United States (in the eighties),

and that was for economic reasons and then re-consider that in 2004,

and will build new nuclear reactors to generate electricity because it does not cause the release of gases harmful to the environment .

The history (cont.):-

Page 10: The think quest project

10

Uses-:

The most common use of nuclear reactors is for the generation of electric energy and for the power in some ships.

Heat from nuclear fission is used to raise steam, which runs through turbines, which in turn powers either ship's propulsion or electrical generators.

Page 11: The think quest project

11

Nuclear power provides the world with more than 16% of electric power;

– they provide 35% of the needs of the European Union.

– Japan gets 30% of its electricity from nuclear energy,

– Belgium, Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia and South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, Slovenia and Ukraine relies on nuclear power to provide the third of its energy.

Uses (cont.)-:

Page 12: The think quest project

12

When an atom undergoes fission it splits into smaller atoms, other particles and releases energy.

It turns out that it is possible to harness the energy of this process on a large enough scale for it to be a viable way of producing energy.

How Nuclear Reactors Work-:

Page 13: The think quest project

13

How Nuclear Reactors Work (cont.)-:

Page 14: The think quest project

14

The fundamental point about nuclear energy is that the energy content of 1 gram of Uranium is equivalent to approximately 3 tonnes of coal.

This means that we need to consume

about 3 million times less material with Nuclear Power compared to using Coal or any other Fossil Fuel.

How Nuclear Reactors Work (cont.)-:

Page 15: The think quest project

15

This substantially reduces the volumes of fuel and waste of nuclear power compared to Fossil Fuels.

Nuclear power stations that generate energy occupy small areas of land compared to power stations that rely on solar energy or wind power

How Nuclear Reactors Work (cont.)-:

Page 16: The think quest project

16

The Different Types of Nuclear Reactors:-

There are a number of different types of Nuclear Reactors currently in operation throughout the world. Some of the most common types are described here.

Page 17: The think quest project

17

1 (PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS

Page 19: The think quest project

19

3 (HIGH TEMPERATURE GAS COOLED REACTORS

Page 20: The think quest project

20

4 (HEAVY WATER REACTORS

Page 21: The think quest project

RISKS OF NUCLEAR

RADIATION AND ITS

ACCIDENTS

Page 22: The think quest project

22

RISKS OF NUCLEAR RADIATION AND ITS ACCIDENTS:-

Any imbalances that might occur in a nuclear reactor could cause a human catastrophe of unforeseeable consequences,

such as disaster Chernobyl which resulted in thousands of tonnes of radioactive material that leaked into the atmosphere,

As the output fuel of the nuclear reactor is considered hazardous materials ,

its effects continuous for thousands of years and can not be disposed of it easily.

Page 24: The think quest project

24

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS GENERATE TYPES OF WASTE:-

High level waste:- Includes the fuel

used in the nuclear reactor called spent fuel. It is highly radioactive and very dangerous. A special disposal site is needed for this type of spent fuel

Page 25: The think quest project

25

Low level waste:-

can come from

nuclear reactors or from hospitals or universities. Low-level waste is not as dangerous as high-level waste

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS GENERATE TYPES OF WASTE (CONT.):-

Page 26: The think quest project

26

WASTE STREAMS:-

Nuclear power has at least four waste streams that contaminate and degrade land:-

1) they create Spent nuclear fuel at the reactor site (including plutonium waste)

2) they produce tailings at uranium mines and mills

3) during operation they routinely release small amounts of Radioactive isotopes

4) during accidents they can release large quantities of radioactivity

Page 27: The think quest project

27

METHODS OF DISPOSAL OF NUCLEAR WASTE - :

Disposal of nuclear waste is done in several ways vary according to the strength of outgoing radiation,

including "the weak and medium," where is placed after cooling in the earth,

and surrounded by a layer of cement or rocks,

Page 28: The think quest project

28

THE IMPACT OF RADIATION ON LIVING ORGANISMS - :

nuclear radiation at large doses of radiation caused in deformities and disabilities are difficult to treat

and may be them effect reach to the extent of death for who infected with it,

also nuclear radiation affects directly on the components of living cells as a result of interactions not related to the natural interactions in the cell

Page 29: The think quest project

29

AND the evidence on the harmful effects on people is the risk of cancer where:-

There have been several epidemiological studies that claim to demonstrate increased risk of various diseases,

especially cancers, among people who live near nuclear facilities.

THE IMPACT OF RADIATION ON LIVING ORGANISMS - :

Page 30: The think quest project

30

Among recent studies, a widely cited 2007 meta-analysis of 17 research papers was published in the European Journal of Cancer Care.

It offered evidence of elevated leukemia rates among children living near 136 nuclear facilities in:-

the United Kingdom, Canada, France, United States, Germany, Japan, and

Spain.

THE IMPACT OF RADIATION ON LIVING ORGANISMS - :

Page 31: The think quest project

31

Also these radiations affect on aquatic where there is another type of the pollution is the thermal pollution which is produced by using the water of oceans.

or seas or rivers in large quantities for cooling the reactor

and which are thrown in the source after that ,so them temperature is increased resulted

THE IMPACT OF RADIATION ON LIVING ORGANISMS - :

Page 32: The think quest project

32

imbalance in the environmental system (Eco-system)

and damage all the aquatic which are living in the water

where it decreases the rate of dissolved

oxygen in the water and required for the life of marine organisms.

THE IMPACT OF RADIATION ON LIVING ORGANISMS - :

Page 33: The think quest project

33

And to overcome this problem, some states put laws committed these stations by cooling hot water before throwing them in the sea

or lakes, and some stations established artificial lakes for them to use them in cooling purposes

THE IMPACT OF RADIATION ON LIVING ORGANISMS - :

Page 34: The think quest project

34

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY BY NUCLEAR REACTORS AND PRODUCTION IT BY THERMAL STATIONS:-

The amount of radioactive waste resulting from the nuclear fission in the stations of producting electricity by nuclear reactors is limited compared to the amount of waste in thermal stations powered by fossil such as oil or coal ,

the nuclear waste reach to (3 mg/kwh) compared to about (700 gm /kwh) of carbon dioxide in normal thermal stations

Page 35: The think quest project

35

A nuclear power plant may be safer than a coal power plant, but it still hurts the surrounding environment.

Page 36: The think quest project

36

but this tiny quantity of nuclear radiation may be fatal or may cause deformities and distortions there isn't a treat for them.

For this, all countries that use nuclear energy for electricity production are working to disposal from radioactive waste by buring them in deep geological layers beneath the surface of the earth away from the people,

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY BY NUCLEAR REACTORS AND PRODUCTION IT BY THERMAL STATIONS (CONT.):-

Page 37: The think quest project

37

and may the effectiveness of radiation continues for centuries but for thousands of years,

until the radiation dies down or reach to a level equivalent to natural radiation So scientists are trying currently to generate nuclear energy through nuclear fusion instead of nuclear fission

COMPARISON BETWEEN THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRICITY BY NUCLEAR REACTORS AND PRODUCTION IT BY THERMAL STATIONS (CONT.):-

Page 38: The think quest project

38

TO SHOW THE DANGEROUS OF NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS CLEARLY THESE ARE

EXAMPLES FOR THEM:-

Page 39: The think quest project

39

FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS:-

In March 2011 an earthquake and tsunami caused damage that led to explosions and partial meltdowns

at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant in Japan.

Page 40: The think quest project

40

Radiation levels at the stricken Fukushima I power plant have varied up to 1,000 mSv/h

(millisievert per hour), which is a level that can cause radiation sickness to occur at a later time following a one hour exposure.

The level of radiation within the 20 km exclusion zone surrounding the power plant is such that people have been advised to evacuate,

FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS (CONT.):-

Page 41: The think quest project

41

and people within the 20-30km zone are being advised to stay indoors.

Explosions and a fire have resulted in dangerous levels of radiation, sparking a stock market collapse later, the UK, France

and some other countries told their

nationals to consider leaving Tokyo, in response to fears of spreading nuclear contamination.

FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS (CONT.):-

Page 42: The think quest project

42

New Scientist has reported that emissions of radioactive iodine

and cesium from the crippled Fukushima I nuclear plant have approached levels evident after the Chernobyl disaster in 1986.

FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS (CONT.):-

Page 43: The think quest project

43

As of April 2011, water is still being poured into the damaged reactors to cool melting fuel rods. John Price,

a former member of the Safety Policy Unit at the UK's National Nuclear Corporation,

has said that it "might be 100 years before melting fuel rods can be safely removed from Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant".

FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS (CONT.):-

Page 45: The think quest project

45

CHERNOBYL DISASTER:-

Map showing Caesium-137 contamination in Belarus, Russia, and Ukraine as of 1996.

Page 46: The think quest project

46

The 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine was the world's worst nuclear power plant accident, resulting in an estimated 4,056 deaths.

Large amounts of radioactive contamination were spread across Europe, and cesium and strontium contaminated many agricultural products, livestock and soil.

The accident necessitated the evacuation of 300,000 people from Kiev

CHERNOBYL DISASTER (CONT.):-

Page 47: The think quest project

47

Chernobyl disaster

The nuclear reactor after the disaster. Reactor 4 (center). Turbine building (lower left). Reactor 3 (center right).

Page 48: The think quest project

48

-ALSO THESE ARE STATISTICS ABOUT:

Cost(in

millions2006 $)

Description Location Date

US$443 Electrician's error causes fire in the main trough that destroys control lines and five main coolant pumps

Greifswald, East

Germany

December 7, 1975

Nuclear power plant accidents with more than US$300 million in property damage, to 2009:-

Page 49: The think quest project

49

Cost(in millions

2006 $)

Description Location Date

US$1,700 Severe corrosion of reactor and release of radioactivity into the

plant area, necessitating total decommission

Jaslovské Bohunice,

Czechoslovakia

February 22, 1977

US$2,400 Loss of coolant and partial core meltdown, see Three Mile Island

accident and Three Mile Island accident health

effects

Middletown, Pennsylvania,

US

March 28, 1979

US$1,830 Instrumentation systems malfunction during

startup, which led to suspension of operations at all three Browns Ferry

Units - operations restarted in 1991 for unit 2, in 1995 for unit 3, and

(after a $1.8 billion recommissioning

operation) in 2007 for unit 3

Athens, Alabama, US

March 9, 1985

Page 50: The think quest project

50

Cost(in

millions

2006 $)

Description Location

Date

US$1,001

Recurring equipment problems force emergency

shutdown of Boston Edison's Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant

Plymouth, Massachus

etts, US April 11, 1986

US$6,700

Steam explosion and meltdown with 4,057 deaths

(see Chernobyl disaster) necessitating the evacuation of 300,000 people from the most severely contaminated areas of Belarus, Russia, and

Ukraine, and dispersing radioactive material across

Europe (see Chernobyl disaster effects)

Chernobyl, near the town of Pripyat, Ukraine

April 26, 1986

Page 51: The think quest project

SOLUTIONS

Page 52: The think quest project

52

2- team Idea .s

1-Proce dures for

nuclearsafeguar

ds .

Solutions

Page 53: The think quest project

53

1-PROCEDURES FOR NUCLEAR SAFEGUARDSInternational organizations which interested in matters of protection and nuclear safety recommended by the establishment of national committees set the rules and regulations that govern all practices involving ionizing radiation or radioactive sources in order to take advantage of the benefits of nuclear energy and its positive aspects in various fields with the reduction of risks posed by it to the acceptable limit.

Page 54: The think quest project

54

IT CAN BE RECOMMENDED FOR THE FOLLOWING:

1 - Spreading awareness of the risks and the dissemination of nuclear safety culture among employees radiation or radioactive materials at all levels.

2 - Provide all equipment and technical equipment necessary for the protection and safety.

3 - Providing human expertise with knowledge of procedures for the protection and safety.

4 -Implementation of all nuclear measurements that aim to ensure the protection measures required..

Page 55: The think quest project

55

CONTINUED PROCEDURES FOR NUCLEAR SAFEGUARDS:

5 - Set standards and requirements for all practices, which include exposure to radiation and to identify the official.

6 - The existence of effective planning in

the event of an emergency are known in advance for employees and that perceptions of the development potential of the various incidents based on the experience Available.

Page 56: The think quest project

56

CONTINUED PROCEDURES FOR NUCLEAR SAFEGUARDS:

7 - And there must be an effective administrative organization inside the building used to identify sources of radioactive radiation intensity to be always in the permitted levels of radioactive sources and be stored in safe places and kept in the protective armor in the case of non-use.

Preferably at the creation of a new reactor to be of the type of reactor CAESAR

Page 57: The think quest project

57

OVERVIEW OF THE REACTOR CAESAR Claudio able Vilpon nuclear scientist

and director of the Center of advanced energy at the University of Maryland American innovation and design of advanced reactor "CAESAR" for the production of electricity without causing any radioactive contamination, or the spread of nuclear radiation.

Unlike traditional nuclear reactors operated arms and fuel uranium-238 supplied by about 4% of uranium 235.

Page 58: The think quest project

58

CONTINUED OVERVIEW OF THE REACTOR CAESAR :

When the collision of neutron seed uranium 235 splits off to the nuclei and the amount of energy in the form of heat and more of the neutrinos that hit other atoms.

And controls «mediator» between the fuel rods entered to slow down some of the neutrinos are moving slowly enough so that they splitting nucleus of atoms.

But after two or three years of operation of the reactor, it becomes uranium-235 atoms remaining is insufficient appears to need a new fuel rods.

Page 59: The think quest project

59

CONTINUED OVERVIEW OF THE :REACTOR CAESAR But Caeser reactor depends on the uranium-

238 atoms fission within the fuel rods by neutrons moving at an appropriate speed as a result of the presence of steam as a mediator in the reactor, to control the density accurately, to delay the passage of neutrinos to obtain the required fission of uranium-238 atom.

And the occurrence of nuclear reaction accompanied by the launching of the energy and the launch of more neutrinos, which in turn hit other uranium seed and so on. Caeser and the reactor can run for decades without the need to re-fuel it.

Page 60: The think quest project

60

SOLUTIONS CURRENTLY BEING IMPLEMENTED:

Because water used to cool the reactors are loaded with radiation .

And to overcome this problem, some states put laws committed these stations by cooling hot water before throwing them in the sea or lakes, and some stations established artificial lakes for them to use them in cooling purposes .

Page 61: The think quest project

61

2 -THE TEAM'S IDEAS 1 -Because the concepts of rolling stock for radiological

hazards may sometimes have negative effects as what people may be followed by action in the case of radiation accidents and because of exaggerated fears may lead to negative effects on its own. One of the challenges we face to make sure that the general public have accurate information and concepts in the case of radiation accidents until there is no reaction exaggerated.

-And so it can work on the establishment of scientific material received conferences or taught in schools aimed at educating students the dangers of reactors and nuclear radiation and raise awareness of they need to do in the event of a nuclear disaster (an emergency).

Page 62: The think quest project

62

CONTINUED THE TEAM'S IDEAS2-  Establishment the Assembly on the

idea at an international level like the idea of the insurance company where the participation of nations with nuclear reactors and the amount of money can be joined with scientists.

- In the event of any disruption or disaster Assembly intervene to resolve the imbalance and reduce the risks and be physical and scientific assistance.

Page 63: The think quest project

63

CONTINUED THE TEAM'S IDEAS

3 -Support scientific research to develop procedures for nuclear safeguards.

4- Manufacture of electric-powered chillers to cool the water used in cooling nuclear reactors. Using a fraction of the electricity produced by the reactor and to minimize the risk of radiation that exists. in order to reduce ocean water used in the reactor cooling circuits .

Page 64: The think quest project

64

CONTINUED THE TEAM'S IDEAS:

5- For injured people: establishment a specialized health organizations to treat these people.

These solutions not only contribute to the protection of the environment and the health of living organisms, but also contribute to the promotion and protection of the economy at the international level and global

Page 65: The think quest project

THANKS