the strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on...

12
The strategic road network star rating report June 2019

Upload: others

Post on 22-Sep-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

The strategic road network star rating reportJune 2019

Page 2: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

At Highways England safety is our first

imperative and we aim to have the safest roads

in the world. Our road network is a vital national asset, supporting economic growth, regional development, and employment opportunity across England. It connects families, communities and businesses, enriching the lives of many citizens.

We believe no one should be harmed when travelling or working on our road network. Our work to modernise and maintain the network includes a range of safety measures: upgrading junctions, removing bottlenecks, developing higher standard A-roads, upgrading barriers and verges, and improving signage.

This report outlines progress against our commitment to ensure that, by the end of 2020 more than 90% of travel on our roads is at least 3-star rated, and that we improve the majority of 1-star and 2-star rated to 3-star rated or more. The latest data indicates that 95% of travel on our roads will be 3-star rated roads or above, meaning we have exceeded the target set in our delivery plan. We are also delivering a

targeted programme to improve the star rating of 1-star and 2-star roads. However, we are not complacent, and the detail offered through the latest version of the star rating model provides us with the opportunity to re-evaluate and further improve our roads making it safer for those travelling and working on the network.

We are also committed to working closely with the International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP), the Road Safety Foundation, Transport Research Laboratory (an iRAP centre of excellence) and the Department for Transport to inform the development of a comprehensive star rating system which is better tailored to the strategic road network. The revised model will be used to re-baseline the star rating of the network in 2020 and will continue to form part of our wider analysis of safety improvements on our network to help us make informed decisions about future investment.

Introduction

Page 3: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

Key Headlines

� We have assessed the star rating of our network to set a baseline in 2015 and to forecast results for 2020. These are based on model version 1.0 on which our target was set. Our assessment indicates we will have met our target that 90% of travel will be on 3-star rated roads or more in both 2015 and 2020.

� We are delivering £11 billion of investment to modernise and maintain the strategic road network, these investments will deliver improvements in safety and improve the star rating of our network. This investment has been informed by our star rating work and has contributed to the development of targeted investment programmes which tackle and improve 1-star and 2-star rated roads.

� We will resurvey the network in summer 2020 to assess how this investment has further improved the star rating of the strategic road network.

� We continue to work collaboratively with partners to develop an improved star rating model which better reflects the strategic road network and provides us with further details to improve the safety of our roads in the next roads period.

Safe systems and road safety management

Many countries across the world are now adopting the safe systems philosophy, based on the principles of inevitability that crashes will occur owing to humans being error-prone, and the survivability of crashes based on known tolerances of the human body to crash forces. This requires the design of a holistic system that will protect the road user from death or serious injury when crashes do occur.

The safe systems approach includes the following principles:

1. People make mistakes that can lead to road crashes.

2. The human body has a limited physical ability to tolerate crash forces before harm occurs.

3. A shared responsibility exists amongst those who design, build and manage roads, those who use roads and vehicles, and those who provide post-crash care to prevent crashes resulting in serious injury or death.

4. All parts of the system must be strengthened to multiply their effects; and to ensure that if one part fails, road users are still protected.

We have adopted a comprehensive approach based on safe systems which maximises opportunities to reduce the number of casualties. Safe systems is a holistic approach to road safety, managed so that the elements of the road transport system combine and interact to guide users to act safely and to prevent crashes – and when crashes occur, ensure that the impact forces do not exceed limits of human tolerance that, if exceeded, result in serious injury or death.

On the road, this proactive approach moves the focus away from historical crash ‘cluster’ data. Instead, by implementing road infrastructure treatments we seek to reduce risk before people are harmed. This is not to say that crash data should not be used: historical crash data can be helpful in identifying and prioritising treatments on high risk routes, for example, because larger numbers of crashes over a longer length of road are less likely to come about by chance. This is called ‘risk mapping’ and presents colour-coded maps which indicate the relative risk of different routes based on historical crash data. Risk mapping and star rating are different, but can be used together to prioritise routes that require further investigation and investment.

iRAP star rating

iRAP star rating is a tool that assesses the safety standard of a road against safe system principles. The star ratings are based on road inspection data and provide a simple and objective measure of the level of safety which is ‘built-in’ to the road. The higher the star rating, the safer the road. The iRAP star rating model used today is the result of 20 years of development work, which began

Page 4: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

with EuroRAP (http://www.eurorap.org) in 1999. The model is adjusted as new knowledge, new ideas, and better understanding come to light. These changes keep the model relevant, as we have seen in other sectors such as vehicle safety with EuroNCAP for example. The iRAP Global Technical Committee (GTC) oversees any changes.

In the last ten years, the most significant change has been to move from a 4-star model that only dealt with crash severity to a 5-star model that includes both crash severity and likelihood. The star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target was established.

We have also reviewed and used the current version of the model, version 3.02 (v3.02), identifying a range of areas where it can be enhanced. For example, we have commissioned the development of a shunt module which will feed into future model development and will have a global impact. Star rating not only provides a good and easily understood safety performance indicator, but also provides a rich data source for practitioners. The data collected provides a road safety inventory every 100m along the surveyed network,

allowing a better appreciation of the safety condition of the network; for example, with just a click, a practitioner can see how much of the network has unprotected roadside obstacles, or how much of the network has shoulder rumble strips (known as raised rib edge lines). The survey data also assists with the planning, appraisal and prioritisation of safety countermeasures. New designs can also be star rated, and star rating performance requirements, minimum 3-star, can be built into contracts to challenge design teams.

The star rating of a road depends on a variety of factors relating to the nature of the road. As a result, motorways, with fewer merging junctions and more roadside barrier, normally have higher star ratings than non-motorways. Similarly, dual carriageways, with opposing flows of traffic being physically separated, tend to have higher star ratings than single carriageways. These differences in star ratings reflect the real differences in crash risk: on our network in 2017, motorways have an average of 12 fatal and serious crashes per billion vehicle miles travelled, dual carriageway A-roads have 24 fatal and serious crashes per billion vehicle miles, and single carriageways have 77 fatal and serious crashes per billion vehicle miles.

Part of a global programme

England is far from the only place in the world to have embraced iRAP star ratings. For example, the World Health Organisation has said that, by 2030, all new roads should achieve technical standards for all road users that take road safety into account, or meet a 3-star or better. The following countries / states are amongst those to have adopted targets based on star ratings:

� The Netherlands: No 1-star or 2-star national roads by 2020. This target was set around a decade ago. It should be noted that the network of national roads has only limited sections of single carriageway.

� Sweden: 75% of travel on 3-star or better by 2020 and approaching 100% by 2025. This analysis is being done by modelling rather than re-surveying, based on the policy of introducing wire-rope barriers on all medians.

� New Zealand: Roads of national significance to be 4-star. This is based on a locally adopted version of the model.

� Australia (Tasmania & Queensland): Minimum 3-star related targets for national highways.

� Malaysia: 3-star or better by 2020 for 75% of travel on high volume networks.

Page 5: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

Star rating our road network

To undertake iRAP surveys, our roads were videoed. The images were then used to record road features known to influence crash severity every 100m along the network. The star ratings are produced in the programme by assigning a roadside, central reservation and junction score to each 100-metre section of road. The scores are based on detailed inspections and decades of research into the relative risk associated with different road infrastructure features. This data, along with traffic flows and speeds, were combined with information about pedestrian and bicyclist road use, and calibrated using crash data. The data was then uploaded into the iRAP analysis tools (vida.irap.org).

Having assigned a score for each part of the road, they are then combined to form an overall score and star rating. A 4-star road is likely to have safety barriers at the side of the road and in the central reservation, and to have junctions with motorway-style slip roads. On this type of road, road users are significantly less likely to be killed or seriously injured in the event of a crash than if they were travelling on a 1-star road. Low scoring sections have hazardous fixed objects close to the road, frequent junctions and no head-on protection from oncoming traffic, such as a central barrier. For more detail about the model, please refer to the technical specifications area of irap.org.

Our road safety performance

In 2017, there were 1,542 crashes on our road network which resulted in someone being killed or seriously injured; 619 of these crashes were on motorways, 605 were on A-road dual carriageways and 318 were on A-road single carriageways. Overall, these figures represented a reduction of around 9% in the number of such crashes compared with the 2016 figures, and around 11% in the fatal and serious crash rate.

EuroRAP risk mapping

Risk mapping presents colour-coded maps that indicate the relative risk of different roads given their traffic volumes. The risk map for our network, covering the 2014-16 period, is presented overleaf, displaying the fatal and serious crash rate in coloured bands according to a standardised EuroRAP scale. Most of the strategic road network is in EuroRAP’s ‘low risk’ or ‘low-medium risk’ bands.

There are, however, some ‘medium risk’ and ‘medium-high risk’ roads on this network; the longest sections of these are around Hastings and, according to the Star Rating results, these also contain 1-star or 2-star rated road sections.The risk of a road alongside its star rating are important factors in identifying those locations where investment is required. For example, locations which are high risk and low star rating should be prioritised.

Page 6: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

M20

M25M25

M40

M40

M6

M11

M57

M62

A1(M)

M53

M1

M25

M40

M6

M62

M25

M2M3

M27

M4M4M5

M5

M50

M5

M1 M11

M42

M6

M1

M1

M54

M6

M65

M55

M6

M6

M60M62 M18

M1

A1(M)

M3

M6M1

M1

A1(M)

M66

M40

M61

M1

M56

A1(M)

A3(M)

M4

M23

M18M62

M5

M20

M58

A1(M)

M1

M6

M60

M1

M5

M25

M180

M56

M6 TollM69

M49 M4

M62

M32

M26

M62

M65

M42

A66A66

A590

A66

A19A69

A1

A1A69

A1

A1

A174

A66A6 6

A19

A6 4

A64

A168

A64

A1

A64

A19

A63A63

A180

A1

A1

A628

A56

A616

A585

A38

A5

A49

A38

A5

A5

A49

A5

A49

A49

A46

A40

A4

6

A46

A5

A45

A43

A5

A5

A45

A14

A46

A52

A46

A1

A52

A5 2

A46

A1

A46

A1 20

A12

A47

A47

A12

A1

A14

A1

A14

A14

A 14

A11

A1 4

A14

A12

A47

A1 2

A 120

A47

A1

A 12

A120

A11A4

21

A 47A1

A11

A5

A5

A5

A5

A21

A259

A259

A20

A2

A2 4 9

A2 1

A207 0

A2 7

A2

A27

A23

A27

A3

A3

A3

A27

A3

A303

A36

A35

A31

A31

A303A36

A303

A35

A31

A36

A303

A35

A303

A30

A30

A30

A30

A30

A30

A3 8A38

A38

A30

A419

A417

A34

A40

A34

A34A3 4

A50

A50A50

A42

A458

A483

SkiptonSkipton

DarlingtonDarlington

DurhamDurham

HarrogateHarrogate

HexhamHexhamCarlisleCarlisle

ConsettConsett

HartlepoolHartlepoolBishop AucklandBishop AucklandPenrithPenrith

BarnardBarnardCastleCastle

GuisboroughGuisborough WhitbyWhitby

WindermereWindermere

KendalKendal ScarboroughScarboroughThirskThirsk

Kirkby LonsdaleKirkby Lonsdale

MaltonMaltonRiponRipon

BridlingtonBridlington

AlnwickAlnwick

MorpethMorpeth

TynemouthTynemouth

WorkingtonWorkington

WhitehavenWhitehaven

BroughBrough

MarketMarketWeightonWeighton

KeswickKeswick

Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle upon TyneSunderlandSunderland

MiddlesbroughMiddlesbrough

YorkYork

KingstonKingstonupon Hullupon HullPrestonPreston

ClitheroeClitheroe

BlackburnBlackburn

LancasterLancasterBarrow-in-Barrow-in-

FurnessFurness

FleetwoodFleetwood

SouthportSouthport

BlackpoolBlackpool

LIVERPOOLLIVERPOOL

ImminghamImminghamScunthorpeScunthorpe

GrimsbyGrimsby

GooleGoole

LouthLouth

SkegnessSkegness

BostonBoston CromerCromer

ThetfordThetford DissDiss

Bury StBury StEdmundsEdmunds

FakenhamFakenham

GreatGreatYarmouthYarmouth

LowestoftLowestoft

NorwichNorwich

IpswichIpswich

LeekLeekChesterChester

ChesterfieldChesterfield

CreweCreweAshbourneAshbourne

MacclesfieldMacclesfield

Stoke- Stoke-on-Trenton-Trent

WarringtonWarrington

BuryBuryMANCHESTERMANCHESTER

BoltonBolton

BurnleyBurnleyBRADFORDBRADFORD

LEEDSLEEDSSelbySelby

HuddersfieldHuddersfield

DoncasterDoncasterBarnsleyBarnsley

BuxtonBuxton

SheffieldSheffield GainsboroughGainsboroughWorksopWorksop

LincolnLincoln

Newark-on-TrentNewark-on-TrentMansfieldMansfield

SleafordSleaford

GranthamGrantham

SpaldingSpalding

NottinghamNottinghamDerbyDerby

UttoxeterUttoxeter

StaffordStafford

LichfieldLichfieldupon Trentupon Trent

BurtonBurton MeltonMeltonMowbrayMowbray

StamfordStamford WisbechWisbech

King’sKing’sLynnLynn

PeterboroughPeterboroughLeicesterLeicester

ElyEly

00FelixstoweFelixstowe

HarwichHarwich

Clacton-Clacton-on-Seaon-Sea

ChelmsfordChelmsford

ColchesterColchester

SudburySudbury

BasildonBasildonSouthend-on-SeaSouthend-on-Sea

MargateMargate

RamsgateRamsgate

SheernessSheerness

CanterburyCanterbury

HarlowHarlow

BraintreeBraintree

OswestryOswestry

NewportNewportShrewsburyShrewsbury

TelfordTelfordWolverhamptonWolverhamptonBridgnorthBridgnorth

BIRMINGHAMBIRMINGHAM

LeominsterLeominsterWorcesterWorcester

RedditchRedditch

KidderminsterKidderminsterRugbyRugbyCoventryCoventry

HerefordHereford

upon-Avonupon-AvonStratford-Stratford-

EveshamEveshamBanburyBanbury

CheltenhamCheltenham

KetteringKettering

NorthamptonNorthampton

HuntingdonHuntingdon

CambridgeCambridge

NewmarketNewmarket

HinckleyHinckley

DaventryDaventryWarwickWarwick StSt

NeotsNeots

BedfordBedford

RoystonRoyston

StevenageStevenage

Milton KeynesMilton KeynesBuckinghamBuckingham

BicesterBicester

AylesburyAylesbury

LutonLuton

StStAlbansAlbans

RomfordRomford

LONDONLONDONRochesterRochester

DartfordDartford

DoverDoverFolkestoneFolkestone

AshfordAshford

MaidstoneMaidstoneSevenoaksSevenoaks

RoyalRoyalTunbridgeTunbridge

WellsWells

CrawleyCrawley

GuildfordGuildford

HorshamHorsham

LewesLewesHastingsHastings

BrightonBrighton

WokingWokingDorkingDorking

BracknellBracknell

WatfordWatfordHigh WycombeHigh Wycombe

MaidenheadMaidenhead

ReadingReading

NewburyNewbury

CirencesterCirencester OxfordOxford

GloucesterGloucester

SwindonSwindon

ChippenhamChippenhamBristolBristol

BidefordBidefordBarnstapleBarnstaple

TivertonTiverton

PaigntonPaigntonTorquayTorquay

WeymouthWeymouth

FarehamFareham

BridportBridportBognorBognorRegisRegis

ExmouthExmouth

PortsmouthPortsmouth

BournemouthBournemouthIsle of Wight Isle of Wight

St AustellSt AustellTruroTruro

FalmouthFalmouth

PlymouthPlymouth

LauncestonLaunceston

BodminBodminNewquayNewquay

PenzancePenzance

ExeterExeter

TavistockTavistock

BridgwaterBridgwater

TauntonTaunton

BathBath

SheptonSheptonMalletMallet

StreetStreet

YeovilYeovilBlandfordBlandford

ForumForum

WarminsterWarminsterBasingstokeBasingstokeAndoverAndover

WinchesterWinchesterSalisburySalisbury

FarnhamFarnham

SouthamptonSouthamptonRingwoodRingwood

DorchesterDorchesterPoolePoole

PetersfieldPetersfield

Berwick-Berwick-upon-Tweedupon-Tweed

Road Assessment Programme Risk Rating

Low risk (safest) roads

Low-medium risk roads

Medium risk roads

Medium-high risk roads

High risk roads

Scale20 40 miles0

20 40 60 km0

Unrated roads

Roads not on the SRN

Risk rating of England’s strategic road network

This map shows the statistical risk of death or serious injury occurring on England’s strategic road network for 2014-2016. These risk ratings inform our investment plans, along with analysis of the star rating data. The risk is calculated by comparing the frequency of road crashes resulting in death and serious injury on every stretch of road with how much traffic each road is carrying. For example, the risk on a road carrying 10,000 vehicles a day with 20 crashes is ten times the risk on a road that has the same number of crashes but which carries 100,000 vehicles. For more information on the Road Safety Foundation go to www.roadsafetyfoundation.org. For more information on the statistical background to this research, visit the EuroRAP website at www.eurorap.org

© Road Safety Foundation 2018. Digital Map Data © Collins Bartholomew Ltd 2018. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2018. The Foundation is indebted to the Department for Transport (DfT) for allowing use of data in creating the map. This work

has been financially supported by Ageas. Crash information is for 2014-2016. Traffic is calculated using the averages for 2014-2016 weighted by section length. The roads shown are based on the 2015 network but the map excludes the centres of major cities. No results are presented for

roads shown in grey - these are roads that are not statistically robust enough for analysis. Risk rates on road sections vary but it is expected that, on average, those off the A road network will have higher rates than sections on it. Generally, motorways and high quality dual carriageway roads

function in a similar way and are safer than single carriageway or mixed carriageway roads. Prepared under licence from EuroRAP AISBL using Risk Bands 2020 protocols © Copyright EuroRAP AISBL.This map may not be reproduced without the consent of the Road Safety Foundation.

Page 7: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

Star rating performance

We have assessed our network based on the iRAP model (version 1.0) on which the target was established. This indicates that by 2020 95% of travel on our network will be on roads rated 3-star

or 4-star and that we will have exceeded the 90%

target by 2020, using version 1.0 of the model.

Our assessment of star ratings in 2020 is based on the programme of major projects which will be completed by March 2020. These estimates are, by their nature, conservative as they do not reflect the impacts or include the result of designated funds targeting single carriageways, the safety and congestion fund, and other improvements and enhancements which cannot be accurately represented and forecast within the model given the nature of improvements. The full effect on the star rating performance resulting from these improvements will only be fully understood when the network is re-surveyed in 2020. These conservative estimates have been compared with the 2015 Star Ratings below.

The percentage of traffic on our network travelling on roads that is forecast to be rated 3-star or above in 2020 is expected to increase only slightly between 2015 and 2020. However, projections suggest there will be a shift upwards in the star ratings above the 3-star threshold: the percentage of travel which is on 4-star roads is expected to go up from 56.1% to 59.6% and the percentage on 3-star roads is expected to fall from 38.7% to 35.3%.

5%

60% 35%

Percentage travel 2020 by star rating

23%

70%Motorways

5%

63%

32%

Dual carriageway A-roads

2%4%

36% 58%

Single carriageway A-roads

1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star

100% 100%

90% 90%

80% 80%

70% 70%

60% 60%

50% 50%

40% 40%

30% 30%

20% 20%

10% 10%

0% 0%

2015 results87.2 billion vehicle km

2020 forecast99.7 billion vehicle km

Perc

enta

ge o

f tra

ffic

56.1%

38.7%

5.0%0.2%

59.6%

35.3%

4.9%0.2%

Page 8: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

M20

M25M25

M40

M40

M6

M11

M57

M62

A1(M)

M53

M1

M25

M40

M6

M62

M25

M2M3

M27

M4

M4M5

M5

M50

M5

M1 M11

M42

M6

M1

M1

M54

M6

M65

M55

M6

M6

M60M62 M18

M1

A1(M)

M3

M6M1

M1

A1(M)

M66

M40

M61

M1

M56

A1(M)

A3(M)

M4

M23

M18M62

M5

M20

M58

A1(M)

M1

M6

M60

M1

M5

M25

M180

M56

M6 Toll

M69

M49 M4

M62

M32

M26

M62

M65

M42

A66A66

A590

A66

A19A69

A1

A1

A69

A1

A1

A174

A66A6 6

A19

A6 4

A64

A168

A64

A1

A64

A19

A63A63

A180

A1

A1

A628

A56

A616

A585

A38

A5

A49

A38

A5

A5

A49

A5

A49

A49

A46

A40

A4

6

A46

A5

A45

A43

A5

A5

A45

A14

A46

A52

A46

A1

A52

A5 2

A46

A1

A46

A1 20

A12

A47

A47

A12

A1

A14

A1

A14

A14

A 14

A11

A1 4

A14

A12

A47

A1 2

A 120

A47

A1

A 12

A120

A11A4

21

A 47A1

A11

A5

A5

A5

A5

A21

A259

A259

A20

A2

A2 4 9

A2 1

A207 0

A2 7

A2

A27

A23

A27

A3

A3

A3

A27

A3

A303

A36

A35

A31

A31

A303A36

A303

A35

A31

A36

A303

A35

A303

A30

A30

A30

A30

A30

A30

A3 8A38

A38

A30

A419

A417

A34

A40

A34

A34A3 4

A50

A50A50

A42

A458

A483

SkiptonSkipton

DarlingtonDarlington

DurhamDurham

HarrogateHarrogate

HexhamHexhamCarlisleCarlisle

ConsettConsett

HartlepoolHartlepoolBishop AucklandBishop AucklandPenrithPenrith

BarnardBarnardCastleCastle

GuisboroughGuisborough WhitbyWhitby

WindermereWindermere

KendalKendal ScarboroughScarboroughThirskThirsk

Kirkby LonsdaleKirkby Lonsdale

MaltonMaltonRiponRipon

BridlingtonBridlington

AlnwickAlnwick

MorpethMorpeth

TynemouthTynemouth

WorkingtonWorkington

WhitehavenWhitehaven

BroughBrough

MarketMarketWeightonWeighton

KeswickKeswick

Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle upon TyneSunderlandSunderland

MiddlesbroughMiddlesbrough

YorkYork

KingstonKingstonupon Hullupon HullPrestonPreston

ClitheroeClitheroe

BlackburnBlackburn

LancasterLancaster

Barrow-in-Barrow-in-FurnessFurness

FleetwoodFleetwood

SouthportSouthport

BlackpoolBlackpool

LIVERPOOLLIVERPOOL

ImminghamImminghamScunthorpeScunthorpe

GrimsbyGrimsby

GooleGoole

LouthLouth

SkegnessSkegness

BostonBoston CromerCromer

ThetfordThetford DissDiss

Bury StBury StEdmundsEdmunds

FakenhamFakenham

GreatGreatYarmouthYarmouth

LowestoftLowestoft

NorwichNorwich

IpswichIpswich

LeekLeekChesterChester

ChesterfieldChesterfield

CreweCreweAshbourneAshbourne

MacclesfieldMacclesfield

Stoke- Stoke-on-Trenton-Trent

WarringtonWarrington

BuryBuryMANCHESTERMANCHESTER

BoltonBolton

BurnleyBurnley

BRADFORDBRADFORD

LEEDSLEEDSSelbySelby

HuddersfieldHuddersfield

DoncasterDoncasterBarnsleyBarnsley

BuxtonBuxton

SheffieldSheffield GainsboroughGainsboroughWorksopWorksop

LincolnLincoln

Newark-on-TrentNewark-on-TrentMansfieldMansfield

SleafordSleaford

GranthamGrantham

SpaldingSpalding

NottinghamNottinghamDerbyDerby

UttoxeterUttoxeter

StaffordStafford

LichfieldLichfieldupon Trentupon Trent

BurtonBurton MeltonMeltonMowbrayMowbray

StamfordStamford WisbechWisbech

King’sKing’sLynnLynn

PeterboroughPeterboroughLeicesterLeicester

ElyEly

00

FelixstoweFelixstoweHarwichHarwich

Clacton-Clacton-on-Seaon-Sea

ChelmsfordChelmsford

ColchesterColchester

SudburySudbury

BasildonBasildonSouthend-on-SeaSouthend-on-Sea

MargateMargate

RamsgateRamsgate

SheernessSheerness

CanterburyCanterbury

HarlowHarlow

BraintreeBraintree

OswestryOswestry

NewportNewportShrewsburyShrewsbury

TelfordTelfordWolverhamptonWolverhampton

BridgnorthBridgnorth

BIRMINGHAMBIRMINGHAM

LeominsterLeominsterWorcesterWorcester

RedditchRedditch

KidderminsterKidderminsterRugbyRugbyCoventryCoventry

HerefordHereford

upon-Avonupon-AvonStratford-Stratford-

EveshamEveshamBanburyBanbury

CheltenhamCheltenham

KetteringKettering

NorthamptonNorthampton

HuntingdonHuntingdon

CambridgeCambridge

NewmarketNewmarket

HinckleyHinckley

DaventryDaventryWarwickWarwick StSt

NeotsNeots

BedfordBedford

RoystonRoyston

StevenageStevenage

Milton KeynesMilton KeynesBuckinghamBuckingham

BicesterBicester

AylesburyAylesbury

LutonLuton

StStAlbansAlbans

RomfordRomford

LONDONLONDONRochesterRochester

DartfordDartford

DoverDoverFolkestoneFolkestone

AshfordAshford

MaidstoneMaidstoneSevenoaksSevenoaks

RoyalRoyalTunbridgeTunbridge

WellsWells

CrawleyCrawley

GuildfordGuildford

HorshamHorsham

LewesLewesHastingsHastings

BrightonBrighton

WokingWokingDorkingDorking

BracknellBracknell

WatfordWatfordHigh WycombeHigh Wycombe

MaidenheadMaidenhead

ReadingReading

NewburyNewbury

CirencesterCirencester OxfordOxford

GloucesterGloucester

SwindonSwindon

ChippenhamChippenhamBristolBristol

BidefordBidefordBarnstapleBarnstaple

TivertonTiverton

PaigntonPaigntonTorquayTorquay

WeymouthWeymouth

FarehamFareham

BridportBridportBognorBognorRegisRegis

ExmouthExmouth

PortsmouthPortsmouth

BournemouthBournemouthIsle of Wight Isle of Wight

St AustellSt AustellTruroTruro

FalmouthFalmouth

PlymouthPlymouth

LauncestonLaunceston

BodminBodminNewquayNewquay

PenzancePenzance

ExeterExeter

TavistockTavistock

BridgwaterBridgwater

TauntonTaunton

BathBath

SheptonSheptonMalletMallet

StreetStreet

YeovilYeovilBlandfordBlandford

ForumForum

WarminsterWarminsterBasingstokeBasingstokeAndoverAndover

WinchesterWinchesterSalisburySalisbury

FarnhamFarnham

SouthamptonSouthamptonRingwoodRingwood

DorchesterDorchesterPoolePoole

PetersfieldPetersfield

Berwick-Berwick-upon-Tweedupon-Tweed

Star Ratings

Roads not on the SRN

Scale20 40 miles0

20 40 60 km0

Highways England strategic road network vehicle occupant star ratings (version 1.0) 2020

Star ratings provide a simple and objective measure of the level of safety ‘built in’ to the road for the safety of vehicle occupants. Using iRAP v1.0, 4-star roads are the safest, and 1-star roads are the least safe. Star ratings are based on road inspection data collected through surveys and analysis. Further details at: www.irap.org

Prepared under licence from iRAP using protocol version v1 © Copyright iRAP and EuroRAP 2019. This map may not be reproduced without the written consent of Road Safety Foundation. Digital Map Data © Collins Bartholomew Ltd 2019. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2019.

Page 9: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

Star rating forecasts for 2020

While all travel on our motorways is already on 3-star or above sections, we expect there will be an increase in the proportion of this travel which is on 4-star sections. We predict a similar upward shift in the star ratings of travel on our dual carriageways, including a small reduction in the modest amount of travel on 2-star sections. The percentage of travel on single carriageways which are rated 3-star or above is expected to fall slightly between 2015 and 2020 due to the increased risk of head-on crashes resulting from increased projected travel levels. However, it is on these roads that we will see the effect of wider improvements which have not been captured in our current forecast. Travel on single carriageways accounts for only a small proportion of travel on our network. Overall, there is expected to be a shift upwards in the star rating on the strategic road network because of planned infrastructure investments.

Our approach – applying star rating

Targeted safety programmes - addressing 1 and 2 star roads

Our designated funds safety programme is delivering targeted route treatments for single carriageway corridors where the star ratings are generally lower, for example on the A49, A47 and A21 corridors. We are investing £77m by the end of this roads period (end of March 2020) on these corridors delivering a range of improvements. These include enhanced lining and signing, creating safer verges through removal of obstacles, improving visibility through vegetation clearance, improved vulnerable road user facilities, localised widening, overtaking bans and speed limit reviews. To date we have invested approximately £44m delivering over 90 schemes on our single carriageways.

Motorways

Dual Carriageways

Single Carriageways

1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star

71.8%

30.8%

63.9%

5.2%0.1%

4.2%

36.2%

57.4%

2.2%

28.2%23.2%

32.1%

62.7%

5.1%0.1%

4.1%

35.8%

58.1%

2.0%

76.8%60% 60%

80% 80%

40% 40%

20% 20%

90%

100%

90%

100%

50% 50%

70% 70%

30% 30%

10% 10%

0% 0%2015 results87.2 billion vehicle km

2020 forecast99.7 billion vehicle km

Perc

enta

ge o

f tra

ffic

100% 100%

60% 60%

80% 80%

40% 40%

20% 20%

90% 90%

50% 50%

70% 70%

30% 30%

10% 10%

0% 0%2015 results37.3 billion vehicle km

2020 forecast43.7 billion vehicle km

Perc

enta

ge o

f tra

ffic

100% 100%

60% 60%

80% 80%

40% 40%

20% 20%

90% 90%

50% 50%

70% 70%

30% 30%

10% 10%

0% 0%2015 results8.2 billion vehicle km

2020 forecast9.2 billion vehicle km

Perc

enta

ge o

f tra

ffic

Page 10: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

This includes improvements on the A64 between York and Scarbourgh, where we are investing over £3m in 2019/20 introducing village ‘gateways’, lower speed limits as appropriate, improved pedestrian crossing routes, improved bus stop facilities, dedicated right turns and additional footways, applied consistently throughout the route. This work will alleviate inconsistencies on the A64 in relation to speed limit application, signage and enforcement, while balancing the needs of all road users.

These improvements are also supported by wider investments as outlined in our safety and congestion programme, which will invest £220m by the end of this roads period, and deliver significant safety improvements across the network; for example, improved safer junction arrangements on A64 at Barton Hill (see pictures to the right).

These programmes have been informed by our assessment of the networks star rating. We have also trained over 80 of our engineers to use the iRAP data to help them to develop proactive road safety engineering solutions which will improve safety and the star rating of our network.

Our work on star rating has also been used to inform and develop new infrastructure solutions to prevent collisions on the single carriageways. For example, the introduction of hard shoulder rumble strips (raised rib edge lines) as part of new planned investments. It is also informing the development of our new design standards to ensure that our roads will meet, if not exceed, the 3-star requirement.

Future proofing the iRAP model

Working closely with the Road Safety Foundation and iRAP we have invested in the development of the model, for example incorporating shunts and improving the coding of junctions. This makes it more sensitive to the specific needs of the strategic road network while also benefiting other iRAP users around the world.

A64 improvements

Page 11: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

It is envisaged that these developments will form the basis of a new model to assess the network when it is re-surveyed in 2020. We are also working collaboratively with local authorities to apply iRAP in a targeted manner on their networks, and to support the development of plans for the major roads network.

Developing new performance metrics

We are committed to implementing a safe system across our network. We are working towards our vision that no-one should be harmed whilst working or travelling on our network and that everyone gets home safe and well. Taking a proactive approach to road risk management is an integral part of our strategy. We are in the process of identifying the most appropriate interim casualty targets, such as the reduction in the number of fatal and serious injured casualties by 2030. We are also developing a range of performance indicators to support the achievement of this target, which are likely to include a measure of road design safety using the most up-to-date (3.02) version of the iRAP model.

For more information please email the Strategic Safety Team at: [email protected]

Page 12: The strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target

If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information,please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.

© Crown copyright 2019.

You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence:

visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/

write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email [email protected].

Mapping (where present): © Crown copyright and database rights 2019 OS 100030649. You are permitted to use this data solely to enable you to respond to, or interact with, the organisation that provided you with the data. You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.

This document is also available on our website at www.highwaysengland.co.uk

For an accessible version of this publication please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.

If you have any enquiries about this publication email [email protected] or call 0300 123 5000*. Please quote the Highways England publications code PR20/19.

Highways England creative job number BHM19_0122

*Calls to 03 numbers cost no more than a national rate call to an 01 or 02 number and must count towards any inclusive minutes in the same way as 01 and 02 calls.

These rules apply to calls from any type of line including mobile, BT, other fixed line or payphone. Calls may be recorded or monitored.

Printed on paper from well-managed forests and other controlled sources when issued directly by Highways England.

Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford GU1 4LZ

Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363

If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information,please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.