the strategic road network star rating report · star rating assessment of our network is based on...
TRANSCRIPT
The strategic road network star rating reportJune 2019
At Highways England safety is our first
imperative and we aim to have the safest roads
in the world. Our road network is a vital national asset, supporting economic growth, regional development, and employment opportunity across England. It connects families, communities and businesses, enriching the lives of many citizens.
We believe no one should be harmed when travelling or working on our road network. Our work to modernise and maintain the network includes a range of safety measures: upgrading junctions, removing bottlenecks, developing higher standard A-roads, upgrading barriers and verges, and improving signage.
This report outlines progress against our commitment to ensure that, by the end of 2020 more than 90% of travel on our roads is at least 3-star rated, and that we improve the majority of 1-star and 2-star rated to 3-star rated or more. The latest data indicates that 95% of travel on our roads will be 3-star rated roads or above, meaning we have exceeded the target set in our delivery plan. We are also delivering a
targeted programme to improve the star rating of 1-star and 2-star roads. However, we are not complacent, and the detail offered through the latest version of the star rating model provides us with the opportunity to re-evaluate and further improve our roads making it safer for those travelling and working on the network.
We are also committed to working closely with the International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP), the Road Safety Foundation, Transport Research Laboratory (an iRAP centre of excellence) and the Department for Transport to inform the development of a comprehensive star rating system which is better tailored to the strategic road network. The revised model will be used to re-baseline the star rating of the network in 2020 and will continue to form part of our wider analysis of safety improvements on our network to help us make informed decisions about future investment.
Introduction
Key Headlines
� We have assessed the star rating of our network to set a baseline in 2015 and to forecast results for 2020. These are based on model version 1.0 on which our target was set. Our assessment indicates we will have met our target that 90% of travel will be on 3-star rated roads or more in both 2015 and 2020.
� We are delivering £11 billion of investment to modernise and maintain the strategic road network, these investments will deliver improvements in safety and improve the star rating of our network. This investment has been informed by our star rating work and has contributed to the development of targeted investment programmes which tackle and improve 1-star and 2-star rated roads.
� We will resurvey the network in summer 2020 to assess how this investment has further improved the star rating of the strategic road network.
� We continue to work collaboratively with partners to develop an improved star rating model which better reflects the strategic road network and provides us with further details to improve the safety of our roads in the next roads period.
Safe systems and road safety management
Many countries across the world are now adopting the safe systems philosophy, based on the principles of inevitability that crashes will occur owing to humans being error-prone, and the survivability of crashes based on known tolerances of the human body to crash forces. This requires the design of a holistic system that will protect the road user from death or serious injury when crashes do occur.
The safe systems approach includes the following principles:
1. People make mistakes that can lead to road crashes.
2. The human body has a limited physical ability to tolerate crash forces before harm occurs.
3. A shared responsibility exists amongst those who design, build and manage roads, those who use roads and vehicles, and those who provide post-crash care to prevent crashes resulting in serious injury or death.
4. All parts of the system must be strengthened to multiply their effects; and to ensure that if one part fails, road users are still protected.
We have adopted a comprehensive approach based on safe systems which maximises opportunities to reduce the number of casualties. Safe systems is a holistic approach to road safety, managed so that the elements of the road transport system combine and interact to guide users to act safely and to prevent crashes – and when crashes occur, ensure that the impact forces do not exceed limits of human tolerance that, if exceeded, result in serious injury or death.
On the road, this proactive approach moves the focus away from historical crash ‘cluster’ data. Instead, by implementing road infrastructure treatments we seek to reduce risk before people are harmed. This is not to say that crash data should not be used: historical crash data can be helpful in identifying and prioritising treatments on high risk routes, for example, because larger numbers of crashes over a longer length of road are less likely to come about by chance. This is called ‘risk mapping’ and presents colour-coded maps which indicate the relative risk of different routes based on historical crash data. Risk mapping and star rating are different, but can be used together to prioritise routes that require further investigation and investment.
iRAP star rating
iRAP star rating is a tool that assesses the safety standard of a road against safe system principles. The star ratings are based on road inspection data and provide a simple and objective measure of the level of safety which is ‘built-in’ to the road. The higher the star rating, the safer the road. The iRAP star rating model used today is the result of 20 years of development work, which began
with EuroRAP (http://www.eurorap.org) in 1999. The model is adjusted as new knowledge, new ideas, and better understanding come to light. These changes keep the model relevant, as we have seen in other sectors such as vehicle safety with EuroNCAP for example. The iRAP Global Technical Committee (GTC) oversees any changes.
In the last ten years, the most significant change has been to move from a 4-star model that only dealt with crash severity to a 5-star model that includes both crash severity and likelihood. The star rating assessment of our network is based on the original version of the model, version 1.0 (v1.0) on which our 2015-2020 target was established.
We have also reviewed and used the current version of the model, version 3.02 (v3.02), identifying a range of areas where it can be enhanced. For example, we have commissioned the development of a shunt module which will feed into future model development and will have a global impact. Star rating not only provides a good and easily understood safety performance indicator, but also provides a rich data source for practitioners. The data collected provides a road safety inventory every 100m along the surveyed network,
allowing a better appreciation of the safety condition of the network; for example, with just a click, a practitioner can see how much of the network has unprotected roadside obstacles, or how much of the network has shoulder rumble strips (known as raised rib edge lines). The survey data also assists with the planning, appraisal and prioritisation of safety countermeasures. New designs can also be star rated, and star rating performance requirements, minimum 3-star, can be built into contracts to challenge design teams.
The star rating of a road depends on a variety of factors relating to the nature of the road. As a result, motorways, with fewer merging junctions and more roadside barrier, normally have higher star ratings than non-motorways. Similarly, dual carriageways, with opposing flows of traffic being physically separated, tend to have higher star ratings than single carriageways. These differences in star ratings reflect the real differences in crash risk: on our network in 2017, motorways have an average of 12 fatal and serious crashes per billion vehicle miles travelled, dual carriageway A-roads have 24 fatal and serious crashes per billion vehicle miles, and single carriageways have 77 fatal and serious crashes per billion vehicle miles.
Part of a global programme
England is far from the only place in the world to have embraced iRAP star ratings. For example, the World Health Organisation has said that, by 2030, all new roads should achieve technical standards for all road users that take road safety into account, or meet a 3-star or better. The following countries / states are amongst those to have adopted targets based on star ratings:
� The Netherlands: No 1-star or 2-star national roads by 2020. This target was set around a decade ago. It should be noted that the network of national roads has only limited sections of single carriageway.
� Sweden: 75% of travel on 3-star or better by 2020 and approaching 100% by 2025. This analysis is being done by modelling rather than re-surveying, based on the policy of introducing wire-rope barriers on all medians.
� New Zealand: Roads of national significance to be 4-star. This is based on a locally adopted version of the model.
� Australia (Tasmania & Queensland): Minimum 3-star related targets for national highways.
� Malaysia: 3-star or better by 2020 for 75% of travel on high volume networks.
Star rating our road network
To undertake iRAP surveys, our roads were videoed. The images were then used to record road features known to influence crash severity every 100m along the network. The star ratings are produced in the programme by assigning a roadside, central reservation and junction score to each 100-metre section of road. The scores are based on detailed inspections and decades of research into the relative risk associated with different road infrastructure features. This data, along with traffic flows and speeds, were combined with information about pedestrian and bicyclist road use, and calibrated using crash data. The data was then uploaded into the iRAP analysis tools (vida.irap.org).
Having assigned a score for each part of the road, they are then combined to form an overall score and star rating. A 4-star road is likely to have safety barriers at the side of the road and in the central reservation, and to have junctions with motorway-style slip roads. On this type of road, road users are significantly less likely to be killed or seriously injured in the event of a crash than if they were travelling on a 1-star road. Low scoring sections have hazardous fixed objects close to the road, frequent junctions and no head-on protection from oncoming traffic, such as a central barrier. For more detail about the model, please refer to the technical specifications area of irap.org.
Our road safety performance
In 2017, there were 1,542 crashes on our road network which resulted in someone being killed or seriously injured; 619 of these crashes were on motorways, 605 were on A-road dual carriageways and 318 were on A-road single carriageways. Overall, these figures represented a reduction of around 9% in the number of such crashes compared with the 2016 figures, and around 11% in the fatal and serious crash rate.
EuroRAP risk mapping
Risk mapping presents colour-coded maps that indicate the relative risk of different roads given their traffic volumes. The risk map for our network, covering the 2014-16 period, is presented overleaf, displaying the fatal and serious crash rate in coloured bands according to a standardised EuroRAP scale. Most of the strategic road network is in EuroRAP’s ‘low risk’ or ‘low-medium risk’ bands.
There are, however, some ‘medium risk’ and ‘medium-high risk’ roads on this network; the longest sections of these are around Hastings and, according to the Star Rating results, these also contain 1-star or 2-star rated road sections.The risk of a road alongside its star rating are important factors in identifying those locations where investment is required. For example, locations which are high risk and low star rating should be prioritised.
M20
M25M25
M40
M40
M6
M11
M57
M62
A1(M)
M53
M1
M25
M40
M6
M62
M25
M2M3
M27
M4M4M5
M5
M50
M5
M1 M11
M42
M6
M1
M1
M54
M6
M65
M55
M6
M6
M60M62 M18
M1
A1(M)
M3
M6M1
M1
A1(M)
M66
M40
M61
M1
M56
A1(M)
A3(M)
M4
M23
M18M62
M5
M20
M58
A1(M)
M1
M6
M60
M1
M5
M25
M180
M56
M6 TollM69
M49 M4
M62
M32
M26
M62
M65
M42
A66A66
A590
A66
A19A69
A1
A1A69
A1
A1
A174
A66A6 6
A19
A6 4
A64
A168
A64
A1
A64
A19
A63A63
A180
A1
A1
A628
A56
A616
A585
A38
A5
A49
A38
A5
A5
A49
A5
A49
A49
A46
A40
A4
6
A46
A5
A45
A43
A5
A5
A45
A14
A46
A52
A46
A1
A52
A5 2
A46
A1
A46
A1 20
A12
A47
A47
A12
A1
A14
A1
A14
A14
A 14
A11
A1 4
A14
A12
A47
A1 2
A 120
A47
A1
A 12
A120
A11A4
21
A 47A1
A11
A5
A5
A5
A5
A21
A259
A259
A20
A2
A2 4 9
A2 1
A207 0
A2 7
A2
A27
A23
A27
A3
A3
A3
A27
A3
A303
A36
A35
A31
A31
A303A36
A303
A35
A31
A36
A303
A35
A303
A30
A30
A30
A30
A30
A30
A3 8A38
A38
A30
A419
A417
A34
A40
A34
A34A3 4
A50
A50A50
A42
A458
A483
SkiptonSkipton
DarlingtonDarlington
DurhamDurham
HarrogateHarrogate
HexhamHexhamCarlisleCarlisle
ConsettConsett
HartlepoolHartlepoolBishop AucklandBishop AucklandPenrithPenrith
BarnardBarnardCastleCastle
GuisboroughGuisborough WhitbyWhitby
WindermereWindermere
KendalKendal ScarboroughScarboroughThirskThirsk
Kirkby LonsdaleKirkby Lonsdale
MaltonMaltonRiponRipon
BridlingtonBridlington
AlnwickAlnwick
MorpethMorpeth
TynemouthTynemouth
WorkingtonWorkington
WhitehavenWhitehaven
BroughBrough
MarketMarketWeightonWeighton
KeswickKeswick
Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle upon TyneSunderlandSunderland
MiddlesbroughMiddlesbrough
YorkYork
KingstonKingstonupon Hullupon HullPrestonPreston
ClitheroeClitheroe
BlackburnBlackburn
LancasterLancasterBarrow-in-Barrow-in-
FurnessFurness
FleetwoodFleetwood
SouthportSouthport
BlackpoolBlackpool
LIVERPOOLLIVERPOOL
ImminghamImminghamScunthorpeScunthorpe
GrimsbyGrimsby
GooleGoole
LouthLouth
SkegnessSkegness
BostonBoston CromerCromer
ThetfordThetford DissDiss
Bury StBury StEdmundsEdmunds
FakenhamFakenham
GreatGreatYarmouthYarmouth
LowestoftLowestoft
NorwichNorwich
IpswichIpswich
LeekLeekChesterChester
ChesterfieldChesterfield
CreweCreweAshbourneAshbourne
MacclesfieldMacclesfield
Stoke- Stoke-on-Trenton-Trent
WarringtonWarrington
BuryBuryMANCHESTERMANCHESTER
BoltonBolton
BurnleyBurnleyBRADFORDBRADFORD
LEEDSLEEDSSelbySelby
HuddersfieldHuddersfield
DoncasterDoncasterBarnsleyBarnsley
BuxtonBuxton
SheffieldSheffield GainsboroughGainsboroughWorksopWorksop
LincolnLincoln
Newark-on-TrentNewark-on-TrentMansfieldMansfield
SleafordSleaford
GranthamGrantham
SpaldingSpalding
NottinghamNottinghamDerbyDerby
UttoxeterUttoxeter
StaffordStafford
LichfieldLichfieldupon Trentupon Trent
BurtonBurton MeltonMeltonMowbrayMowbray
StamfordStamford WisbechWisbech
King’sKing’sLynnLynn
PeterboroughPeterboroughLeicesterLeicester
ElyEly
00FelixstoweFelixstowe
HarwichHarwich
Clacton-Clacton-on-Seaon-Sea
ChelmsfordChelmsford
ColchesterColchester
SudburySudbury
BasildonBasildonSouthend-on-SeaSouthend-on-Sea
MargateMargate
RamsgateRamsgate
SheernessSheerness
CanterburyCanterbury
HarlowHarlow
BraintreeBraintree
OswestryOswestry
NewportNewportShrewsburyShrewsbury
TelfordTelfordWolverhamptonWolverhamptonBridgnorthBridgnorth
BIRMINGHAMBIRMINGHAM
LeominsterLeominsterWorcesterWorcester
RedditchRedditch
KidderminsterKidderminsterRugbyRugbyCoventryCoventry
HerefordHereford
upon-Avonupon-AvonStratford-Stratford-
EveshamEveshamBanburyBanbury
CheltenhamCheltenham
KetteringKettering
NorthamptonNorthampton
HuntingdonHuntingdon
CambridgeCambridge
NewmarketNewmarket
HinckleyHinckley
DaventryDaventryWarwickWarwick StSt
NeotsNeots
BedfordBedford
RoystonRoyston
StevenageStevenage
Milton KeynesMilton KeynesBuckinghamBuckingham
BicesterBicester
AylesburyAylesbury
LutonLuton
StStAlbansAlbans
RomfordRomford
LONDONLONDONRochesterRochester
DartfordDartford
DoverDoverFolkestoneFolkestone
AshfordAshford
MaidstoneMaidstoneSevenoaksSevenoaks
RoyalRoyalTunbridgeTunbridge
WellsWells
CrawleyCrawley
GuildfordGuildford
HorshamHorsham
LewesLewesHastingsHastings
BrightonBrighton
WokingWokingDorkingDorking
BracknellBracknell
WatfordWatfordHigh WycombeHigh Wycombe
MaidenheadMaidenhead
ReadingReading
NewburyNewbury
CirencesterCirencester OxfordOxford
GloucesterGloucester
SwindonSwindon
ChippenhamChippenhamBristolBristol
BidefordBidefordBarnstapleBarnstaple
TivertonTiverton
PaigntonPaigntonTorquayTorquay
WeymouthWeymouth
FarehamFareham
BridportBridportBognorBognorRegisRegis
ExmouthExmouth
PortsmouthPortsmouth
BournemouthBournemouthIsle of Wight Isle of Wight
St AustellSt AustellTruroTruro
FalmouthFalmouth
PlymouthPlymouth
LauncestonLaunceston
BodminBodminNewquayNewquay
PenzancePenzance
ExeterExeter
TavistockTavistock
BridgwaterBridgwater
TauntonTaunton
BathBath
SheptonSheptonMalletMallet
StreetStreet
YeovilYeovilBlandfordBlandford
ForumForum
WarminsterWarminsterBasingstokeBasingstokeAndoverAndover
WinchesterWinchesterSalisburySalisbury
FarnhamFarnham
SouthamptonSouthamptonRingwoodRingwood
DorchesterDorchesterPoolePoole
PetersfieldPetersfield
Berwick-Berwick-upon-Tweedupon-Tweed
Road Assessment Programme Risk Rating
Low risk (safest) roads
Low-medium risk roads
Medium risk roads
Medium-high risk roads
High risk roads
Scale20 40 miles0
20 40 60 km0
Unrated roads
Roads not on the SRN
Risk rating of England’s strategic road network
This map shows the statistical risk of death or serious injury occurring on England’s strategic road network for 2014-2016. These risk ratings inform our investment plans, along with analysis of the star rating data. The risk is calculated by comparing the frequency of road crashes resulting in death and serious injury on every stretch of road with how much traffic each road is carrying. For example, the risk on a road carrying 10,000 vehicles a day with 20 crashes is ten times the risk on a road that has the same number of crashes but which carries 100,000 vehicles. For more information on the Road Safety Foundation go to www.roadsafetyfoundation.org. For more information on the statistical background to this research, visit the EuroRAP website at www.eurorap.org
© Road Safety Foundation 2018. Digital Map Data © Collins Bartholomew Ltd 2018. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2018. The Foundation is indebted to the Department for Transport (DfT) for allowing use of data in creating the map. This work
has been financially supported by Ageas. Crash information is for 2014-2016. Traffic is calculated using the averages for 2014-2016 weighted by section length. The roads shown are based on the 2015 network but the map excludes the centres of major cities. No results are presented for
roads shown in grey - these are roads that are not statistically robust enough for analysis. Risk rates on road sections vary but it is expected that, on average, those off the A road network will have higher rates than sections on it. Generally, motorways and high quality dual carriageway roads
function in a similar way and are safer than single carriageway or mixed carriageway roads. Prepared under licence from EuroRAP AISBL using Risk Bands 2020 protocols © Copyright EuroRAP AISBL.This map may not be reproduced without the consent of the Road Safety Foundation.
Star rating performance
We have assessed our network based on the iRAP model (version 1.0) on which the target was established. This indicates that by 2020 95% of travel on our network will be on roads rated 3-star
or 4-star and that we will have exceeded the 90%
target by 2020, using version 1.0 of the model.
Our assessment of star ratings in 2020 is based on the programme of major projects which will be completed by March 2020. These estimates are, by their nature, conservative as they do not reflect the impacts or include the result of designated funds targeting single carriageways, the safety and congestion fund, and other improvements and enhancements which cannot be accurately represented and forecast within the model given the nature of improvements. The full effect on the star rating performance resulting from these improvements will only be fully understood when the network is re-surveyed in 2020. These conservative estimates have been compared with the 2015 Star Ratings below.
The percentage of traffic on our network travelling on roads that is forecast to be rated 3-star or above in 2020 is expected to increase only slightly between 2015 and 2020. However, projections suggest there will be a shift upwards in the star ratings above the 3-star threshold: the percentage of travel which is on 4-star roads is expected to go up from 56.1% to 59.6% and the percentage on 3-star roads is expected to fall from 38.7% to 35.3%.
5%
60% 35%
Percentage travel 2020 by star rating
23%
70%Motorways
5%
63%
32%
Dual carriageway A-roads
2%4%
36% 58%
Single carriageway A-roads
1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star
100% 100%
90% 90%
80% 80%
70% 70%
60% 60%
50% 50%
40% 40%
30% 30%
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
2015 results87.2 billion vehicle km
2020 forecast99.7 billion vehicle km
Perc
enta
ge o
f tra
ffic
56.1%
38.7%
5.0%0.2%
59.6%
35.3%
4.9%0.2%
M20
M25M25
M40
M40
M6
M11
M57
M62
A1(M)
M53
M1
M25
M40
M6
M62
M25
M2M3
M27
M4
M4M5
M5
M50
M5
M1 M11
M42
M6
M1
M1
M54
M6
M65
M55
M6
M6
M60M62 M18
M1
A1(M)
M3
M6M1
M1
A1(M)
M66
M40
M61
M1
M56
A1(M)
A3(M)
M4
M23
M18M62
M5
M20
M58
A1(M)
M1
M6
M60
M1
M5
M25
M180
M56
M6 Toll
M69
M49 M4
M62
M32
M26
M62
M65
M42
A66A66
A590
A66
A19A69
A1
A1
A69
A1
A1
A174
A66A6 6
A19
A6 4
A64
A168
A64
A1
A64
A19
A63A63
A180
A1
A1
A628
A56
A616
A585
A38
A5
A49
A38
A5
A5
A49
A5
A49
A49
A46
A40
A4
6
A46
A5
A45
A43
A5
A5
A45
A14
A46
A52
A46
A1
A52
A5 2
A46
A1
A46
A1 20
A12
A47
A47
A12
A1
A14
A1
A14
A14
A 14
A11
A1 4
A14
A12
A47
A1 2
A 120
A47
A1
A 12
A120
A11A4
21
A 47A1
A11
A5
A5
A5
A5
A21
A259
A259
A20
A2
A2 4 9
A2 1
A207 0
A2 7
A2
A27
A23
A27
A3
A3
A3
A27
A3
A303
A36
A35
A31
A31
A303A36
A303
A35
A31
A36
A303
A35
A303
A30
A30
A30
A30
A30
A30
A3 8A38
A38
A30
A419
A417
A34
A40
A34
A34A3 4
A50
A50A50
A42
A458
A483
SkiptonSkipton
DarlingtonDarlington
DurhamDurham
HarrogateHarrogate
HexhamHexhamCarlisleCarlisle
ConsettConsett
HartlepoolHartlepoolBishop AucklandBishop AucklandPenrithPenrith
BarnardBarnardCastleCastle
GuisboroughGuisborough WhitbyWhitby
WindermereWindermere
KendalKendal ScarboroughScarboroughThirskThirsk
Kirkby LonsdaleKirkby Lonsdale
MaltonMaltonRiponRipon
BridlingtonBridlington
AlnwickAlnwick
MorpethMorpeth
TynemouthTynemouth
WorkingtonWorkington
WhitehavenWhitehaven
BroughBrough
MarketMarketWeightonWeighton
KeswickKeswick
Newcastle upon TyneNewcastle upon TyneSunderlandSunderland
MiddlesbroughMiddlesbrough
YorkYork
KingstonKingstonupon Hullupon HullPrestonPreston
ClitheroeClitheroe
BlackburnBlackburn
LancasterLancaster
Barrow-in-Barrow-in-FurnessFurness
FleetwoodFleetwood
SouthportSouthport
BlackpoolBlackpool
LIVERPOOLLIVERPOOL
ImminghamImminghamScunthorpeScunthorpe
GrimsbyGrimsby
GooleGoole
LouthLouth
SkegnessSkegness
BostonBoston CromerCromer
ThetfordThetford DissDiss
Bury StBury StEdmundsEdmunds
FakenhamFakenham
GreatGreatYarmouthYarmouth
LowestoftLowestoft
NorwichNorwich
IpswichIpswich
LeekLeekChesterChester
ChesterfieldChesterfield
CreweCreweAshbourneAshbourne
MacclesfieldMacclesfield
Stoke- Stoke-on-Trenton-Trent
WarringtonWarrington
BuryBuryMANCHESTERMANCHESTER
BoltonBolton
BurnleyBurnley
BRADFORDBRADFORD
LEEDSLEEDSSelbySelby
HuddersfieldHuddersfield
DoncasterDoncasterBarnsleyBarnsley
BuxtonBuxton
SheffieldSheffield GainsboroughGainsboroughWorksopWorksop
LincolnLincoln
Newark-on-TrentNewark-on-TrentMansfieldMansfield
SleafordSleaford
GranthamGrantham
SpaldingSpalding
NottinghamNottinghamDerbyDerby
UttoxeterUttoxeter
StaffordStafford
LichfieldLichfieldupon Trentupon Trent
BurtonBurton MeltonMeltonMowbrayMowbray
StamfordStamford WisbechWisbech
King’sKing’sLynnLynn
PeterboroughPeterboroughLeicesterLeicester
ElyEly
00
FelixstoweFelixstoweHarwichHarwich
Clacton-Clacton-on-Seaon-Sea
ChelmsfordChelmsford
ColchesterColchester
SudburySudbury
BasildonBasildonSouthend-on-SeaSouthend-on-Sea
MargateMargate
RamsgateRamsgate
SheernessSheerness
CanterburyCanterbury
HarlowHarlow
BraintreeBraintree
OswestryOswestry
NewportNewportShrewsburyShrewsbury
TelfordTelfordWolverhamptonWolverhampton
BridgnorthBridgnorth
BIRMINGHAMBIRMINGHAM
LeominsterLeominsterWorcesterWorcester
RedditchRedditch
KidderminsterKidderminsterRugbyRugbyCoventryCoventry
HerefordHereford
upon-Avonupon-AvonStratford-Stratford-
EveshamEveshamBanburyBanbury
CheltenhamCheltenham
KetteringKettering
NorthamptonNorthampton
HuntingdonHuntingdon
CambridgeCambridge
NewmarketNewmarket
HinckleyHinckley
DaventryDaventryWarwickWarwick StSt
NeotsNeots
BedfordBedford
RoystonRoyston
StevenageStevenage
Milton KeynesMilton KeynesBuckinghamBuckingham
BicesterBicester
AylesburyAylesbury
LutonLuton
StStAlbansAlbans
RomfordRomford
LONDONLONDONRochesterRochester
DartfordDartford
DoverDoverFolkestoneFolkestone
AshfordAshford
MaidstoneMaidstoneSevenoaksSevenoaks
RoyalRoyalTunbridgeTunbridge
WellsWells
CrawleyCrawley
GuildfordGuildford
HorshamHorsham
LewesLewesHastingsHastings
BrightonBrighton
WokingWokingDorkingDorking
BracknellBracknell
WatfordWatfordHigh WycombeHigh Wycombe
MaidenheadMaidenhead
ReadingReading
NewburyNewbury
CirencesterCirencester OxfordOxford
GloucesterGloucester
SwindonSwindon
ChippenhamChippenhamBristolBristol
BidefordBidefordBarnstapleBarnstaple
TivertonTiverton
PaigntonPaigntonTorquayTorquay
WeymouthWeymouth
FarehamFareham
BridportBridportBognorBognorRegisRegis
ExmouthExmouth
PortsmouthPortsmouth
BournemouthBournemouthIsle of Wight Isle of Wight
St AustellSt AustellTruroTruro
FalmouthFalmouth
PlymouthPlymouth
LauncestonLaunceston
BodminBodminNewquayNewquay
PenzancePenzance
ExeterExeter
TavistockTavistock
BridgwaterBridgwater
TauntonTaunton
BathBath
SheptonSheptonMalletMallet
StreetStreet
YeovilYeovilBlandfordBlandford
ForumForum
WarminsterWarminsterBasingstokeBasingstokeAndoverAndover
WinchesterWinchesterSalisburySalisbury
FarnhamFarnham
SouthamptonSouthamptonRingwoodRingwood
DorchesterDorchesterPoolePoole
PetersfieldPetersfield
Berwick-Berwick-upon-Tweedupon-Tweed
Star Ratings
Roads not on the SRN
Scale20 40 miles0
20 40 60 km0
Highways England strategic road network vehicle occupant star ratings (version 1.0) 2020
Star ratings provide a simple and objective measure of the level of safety ‘built in’ to the road for the safety of vehicle occupants. Using iRAP v1.0, 4-star roads are the safest, and 1-star roads are the least safe. Star ratings are based on road inspection data collected through surveys and analysis. Further details at: www.irap.org
Prepared under licence from iRAP using protocol version v1 © Copyright iRAP and EuroRAP 2019. This map may not be reproduced without the written consent of Road Safety Foundation. Digital Map Data © Collins Bartholomew Ltd 2019. Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2019.
Star rating forecasts for 2020
While all travel on our motorways is already on 3-star or above sections, we expect there will be an increase in the proportion of this travel which is on 4-star sections. We predict a similar upward shift in the star ratings of travel on our dual carriageways, including a small reduction in the modest amount of travel on 2-star sections. The percentage of travel on single carriageways which are rated 3-star or above is expected to fall slightly between 2015 and 2020 due to the increased risk of head-on crashes resulting from increased projected travel levels. However, it is on these roads that we will see the effect of wider improvements which have not been captured in our current forecast. Travel on single carriageways accounts for only a small proportion of travel on our network. Overall, there is expected to be a shift upwards in the star rating on the strategic road network because of planned infrastructure investments.
Our approach – applying star rating
Targeted safety programmes - addressing 1 and 2 star roads
Our designated funds safety programme is delivering targeted route treatments for single carriageway corridors where the star ratings are generally lower, for example on the A49, A47 and A21 corridors. We are investing £77m by the end of this roads period (end of March 2020) on these corridors delivering a range of improvements. These include enhanced lining and signing, creating safer verges through removal of obstacles, improving visibility through vegetation clearance, improved vulnerable road user facilities, localised widening, overtaking bans and speed limit reviews. To date we have invested approximately £44m delivering over 90 schemes on our single carriageways.
Motorways
Dual Carriageways
Single Carriageways
1 star 2 star 3 star 4 star
71.8%
30.8%
63.9%
5.2%0.1%
4.2%
36.2%
57.4%
2.2%
28.2%23.2%
32.1%
62.7%
5.1%0.1%
4.1%
35.8%
58.1%
2.0%
76.8%60% 60%
80% 80%
40% 40%
20% 20%
90%
100%
90%
100%
50% 50%
70% 70%
30% 30%
10% 10%
0% 0%2015 results87.2 billion vehicle km
2020 forecast99.7 billion vehicle km
Perc
enta
ge o
f tra
ffic
100% 100%
60% 60%
80% 80%
40% 40%
20% 20%
90% 90%
50% 50%
70% 70%
30% 30%
10% 10%
0% 0%2015 results37.3 billion vehicle km
2020 forecast43.7 billion vehicle km
Perc
enta
ge o
f tra
ffic
100% 100%
60% 60%
80% 80%
40% 40%
20% 20%
90% 90%
50% 50%
70% 70%
30% 30%
10% 10%
0% 0%2015 results8.2 billion vehicle km
2020 forecast9.2 billion vehicle km
Perc
enta
ge o
f tra
ffic
This includes improvements on the A64 between York and Scarbourgh, where we are investing over £3m in 2019/20 introducing village ‘gateways’, lower speed limits as appropriate, improved pedestrian crossing routes, improved bus stop facilities, dedicated right turns and additional footways, applied consistently throughout the route. This work will alleviate inconsistencies on the A64 in relation to speed limit application, signage and enforcement, while balancing the needs of all road users.
These improvements are also supported by wider investments as outlined in our safety and congestion programme, which will invest £220m by the end of this roads period, and deliver significant safety improvements across the network; for example, improved safer junction arrangements on A64 at Barton Hill (see pictures to the right).
These programmes have been informed by our assessment of the networks star rating. We have also trained over 80 of our engineers to use the iRAP data to help them to develop proactive road safety engineering solutions which will improve safety and the star rating of our network.
Our work on star rating has also been used to inform and develop new infrastructure solutions to prevent collisions on the single carriageways. For example, the introduction of hard shoulder rumble strips (raised rib edge lines) as part of new planned investments. It is also informing the development of our new design standards to ensure that our roads will meet, if not exceed, the 3-star requirement.
Future proofing the iRAP model
Working closely with the Road Safety Foundation and iRAP we have invested in the development of the model, for example incorporating shunts and improving the coding of junctions. This makes it more sensitive to the specific needs of the strategic road network while also benefiting other iRAP users around the world.
A64 improvements
It is envisaged that these developments will form the basis of a new model to assess the network when it is re-surveyed in 2020. We are also working collaboratively with local authorities to apply iRAP in a targeted manner on their networks, and to support the development of plans for the major roads network.
Developing new performance metrics
We are committed to implementing a safe system across our network. We are working towards our vision that no-one should be harmed whilst working or travelling on our network and that everyone gets home safe and well. Taking a proactive approach to road risk management is an integral part of our strategy. We are in the process of identifying the most appropriate interim casualty targets, such as the reduction in the number of fatal and serious injured casualties by 2030. We are also developing a range of performance indicators to support the achievement of this target, which are likely to include a measure of road design safety using the most up-to-date (3.02) version of the iRAP model.
For more information please email the Strategic Safety Team at: [email protected]
If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information,please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.
© Crown copyright 2019.
You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence:
visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/
write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email [email protected].
Mapping (where present): © Crown copyright and database rights 2019 OS 100030649. You are permitted to use this data solely to enable you to respond to, or interact with, the organisation that provided you with the data. You are not permitted to copy, sub-licence, distribute or sell any of this data to third parties in any form.
This document is also available on our website at www.highwaysengland.co.uk
For an accessible version of this publication please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.
If you have any enquiries about this publication email [email protected] or call 0300 123 5000*. Please quote the Highways England publications code PR20/19.
Highways England creative job number BHM19_0122
*Calls to 03 numbers cost no more than a national rate call to an 01 or 02 number and must count towards any inclusive minutes in the same way as 01 and 02 calls.
These rules apply to calls from any type of line including mobile, BT, other fixed line or payphone. Calls may be recorded or monitored.
Printed on paper from well-managed forests and other controlled sources when issued directly by Highways England.
Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford GU1 4LZ
Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363
If you need help accessing this or any other Highways England information,please call 0300 123 5000 and we will help you.