the story of the quantum
DESCRIPTION
The Story of the Quantum. 量子的故事. 2006.11.11 Academia Sinica. In the past century, the progress in physics is tremendous: Elementary particles, atoms, nuclei, solid states, …, cosmology. Physics Technologies Our lives World. Pillars of modern physics: (1) Relativity - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Story of the Quantum
量子的故事
2006.11.11 Academia Sinica
![Page 2: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
In the past century, the progress in physics is tremendous:
Elementary particles, atoms, nuclei, solid states, …, cosmology
Physics Technologies Our lives World
![Page 3: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Pillars of modern physics:
(1) Relativity
(2) Quantum theory
…
![Page 4: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Theory of Relativity (1905, 1915):
Structure of space-timeMotion at high speeds
Well accepted by everybody!
3-d space + time = 4-d space-time
![Page 5: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Quantum Theory (1901-1930)
Physics of the microscopic world
g.s. ~ 0.1 nanometer ~
Predictions are all correct, but …Underlying physics is controversial!
“Wavefunction”
![Page 6: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
--- Albert Einstein (1879-1955, German, Swiss, US)
Nobel Prize: 1921
(for photoelectric effect)
“Quantum mechanics: Real black magic calculus”
1999
![Page 7: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
--- Niels Bohr (1885-1962, Danish)
Nobel Prize: 1922
(for atomic model)
"And anyone who thinks they can talk about quantum theory without feeling dizzy hasn't yet understood the first thing about it."
![Page 8: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
--- Richard Feynman (1918-1988, American)
Nobel Prize: 1965 (for QED)
“I think I can safely say that no one understands quantum mechanics”
![Page 9: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Quantum Revolution:
Began 1901: Max Planck (1858-1947)
Nobel Prize: 1918
Ended 1930: Paul Dirac (1902-1984)
Nobel Prize: 1933
![Page 10: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
George Gamow (1904-1968, Ukrainian, US)
1948: CMB T~
Alpha-Bethe-Gamow
1965
![Page 11: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Physics at the end of 19th century
Issac Newton (1643-1727)
1687: Principia (Philosophiae Naturalis Principia
Mathematica)
Alexander Pope: “Nature and nature's laws lay hid in night;
God said "Let Newton be" and all was light.”
![Page 12: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Leonhard Euler (1707-1783, Swiss)
Joseph-Louis Lagrange(1736-1813, Italian French)
Pierre-Simon Laplace(1749-1827, French)
William Hamilton(1805-1865, Irish)
![Page 13: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
A mechanical, deterministic world view:
Laplace (~1800): A being equipped with unlimited computational p
ower, and given complete knowledge of the positions and momenta of all particles at one instance of time, could use Newton’s equation to predict the future and retrodict the past of the whole universe with certainty.
![Page 14: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Statistical mechanics:
Ludwig Boltzmann (1844-1906, Austrian)
--- Boltzmann equation (1872)
--- (1877)
Willard Gibbs (1839-1903, American)
--- Gibbs ensembles (1876)
![Page 16: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
James Maxwell (1831-1879)“Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism” (1873)
Maxwell’s equations (1864):--- Unification of Electricity
and Magnetism
--- Maxwell eq. wave equation
wave velocity=speed of light
Light is electromagnetic wave
![Page 17: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Thus, at 1900, it seems that the classical theories of Newton and Maxwell are able to explain everything on earth and in the sky.
Well, almost …
Cracks in classical physics: (1) Nature of light (2) Blackbody radiation (3) Spectrum of hydrogen
![Page 18: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Nature of Light: Particle or wave?
Newton: Particle(1643-1727, English)
Christiaan Huygens: Wave(1629-1695, Dutch)
![Page 19: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Thomas Young (1773-1829, English)
“The last person who knows everything”(1) Double slit (1801)
(2) Young’s Modulus
(3) Vision of color
(4) Heart and arteries
(5) Translation of Rosetta stone (1918)
![Page 20: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Waves interfer:
(1) Flickr: naughton321 (2) Flickr: Mr. 7
![Page 21: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Double-slit experiment
x
![Page 22: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Black-body radiation
A blackbody is a theoretical object which absorbs radiation of all wavelengths. (Reflects nothing, therefore black)
(Jean-RayleighUltraviolet catastrophe)
Black-bodyTemp = T
![Page 24: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Birth of the quantum
Max Planck (1858-1947, German)
(1901, Berlin)
Nobel Prize: 1918
So, light is particles!
![Page 25: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
(2) Photoelectric effect (first observed 1839 by Becquerel )
Critical frequencyBelow: no emission, no matter how intenseAbove: emission, even weak
![Page 26: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Albert Einstein (1879-1955, German, Swiss, US)
1905 (annus mirabilis, year of wonders)
(1) Brownian motion(2) Photoelectric effect(3) Special relativity
Note: In 1905, he was a third-class examiner in the Patent Office in Berne, i.e., an amateur physicist!
![Page 27: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Explanation of photoelectric effect
W = Work function
= Minimum energy needed to kick out an electron
Therefore, if E < W, no electron at all
if E > W, some electrons, no matter how
dim is the light
Again, light is particles, not wave!
![Page 28: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Spectrum of Hydrogen
Johann Balmer (1825-1898, Swiss)
Bamler Series (1885):
No one cared much about this result in 1885, because no one knew what atoms are!
![Page 29: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Note:
Electron (1897): J. J. Thomson
(1856-1940, English)
Nobel prize: 1906
Nucleus (1911): Ernest Rutherford (1871-1937, NZ, English) Nobel prize: 1908 (Chemistry, radioactivity of atoms)
![Page 30: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Atomic model
Electron:
J. J. Thomson, 1897
Nucleus:
E. Rutherford, 1911
plum pudding
Problem: circulating electron radiates!How does one stablize the atom?
![Page 31: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
The Bohr atom (1913)
--- Niels Bohr (1885-1962, Danish)
Nobel Prize: 1922
(for atomic structure)
Semi-classical model of H atom: rules, not theory
![Page 32: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
1914, Bohr became famous after the success of his atomic model, and the Royal Danish Academy of Science gave him financial support to set up an Physics Institute.
The fund was actually donated by Carlsberg Brewery (beer)!
The Institute quickly became the center of quantum science in the 1920s and 1930s, due to Bohr’s genius and his personality.
![Page 33: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Birth of Quantum Theory (1925)
Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976, German)Nobel Prize: 1932
Matrix Mechanics:
Matrices:
p and x are represented as matrices of infinite dimension
Commutation relation/Quantization condition
![Page 34: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Wave Mechanics (precursor)
1924: Louis de Broglie (1892-1987, French) Nobel Prize: 1929
Ph.D. thesis: Electron as wave
If undulating light has particle nature, may be
particles like electrons have wave properties too!
![Page 35: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Wave Mechanics (1926) (a few months after Heisenberg)
Erwin Schrodinger (1887-1961, Austrian)Nobel Prize: 1933
Schrodinger Equation: The state of a particle is represented by a “wavefunction” which satisfies
Where H(p,x)
![Page 36: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Note: • 1925: Heisenberg was recuperating in a North S
ea island after an severe attack of hay fever. (summer, 1925)
• 1926: Schrodinger was recuperating in Arosa (a 1700m alpine resort) due to suspected tuberculosis, in the company of a girlfriend.
(Christmas, 1925- early 1926) (The identity of the lady of Arosa was never known.)
![Page 37: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Max Born (1882-1970, German) Nobel Prize: 1954
Paul Dirac (1902-1984, English) Nobel Prize: 1933
Theories of Heisenberg and Schrodinger are in fact equivalent!
![Page 38: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Relativistic quantum mechanics
(Schrodinger equation + special relativity)
Paul Dirac (1928)
Dirac equation
--- for electron, not photon
--- gives the correct magnetic moment
But…It had negative energy solutions!
![Page 39: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Dirac:
All the negative levels have already been occupied by other electrons!
Pauli principle then excludes other electrons from these levels.
(1) One-body becomes many-body…
(2) Is the negative electron sea observable?
![Page 40: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Dirac: hole = proton (In the old days, physicists are much more conservative at proposing new particles.)
In 1932 Carl Anderson found positron(1905-1991; Nobel prize: 1936)
Dirac said yes!
![Page 41: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Later we found that “Dirac sea” is actually not necessary!
So, sometimes one could get the right answer for the wrong reason!
(That is, if you are clever enough!)
Story: Dirac and fish
![Page 42: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Nobel Prizes:
1932: W. Heisenberg
"for the creation of QM…"
1933: E. Schrodinger and P. Dirac
"for the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory"
Prizes conferred in the same year 1933 (no prize given in 1931 and 1932)
![Page 43: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
W. Pauli: Heisenberg over Schrodinger(1) Matrix mechanics precedes wave mechanics.
(2) Matrix mechanics is more original, for wave mechanics relies on the idea of de Broglie.
A. Einstein: Schrodinger over Heisenberg “I have the impression that the concepts created by
him (Schrodinger) will extend further than those of Heisenberg.”
![Page 44: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Heisenberg:
Schrodinger:
![Page 45: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
As we shall see, the physical principle presented by QM is so revolutionary that it totally changed our understanding of nature forever!
Deterministic vs Probabilistic (classical) (quantum)
![Page 46: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
(1) Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
(2) Superposition Principle
However, QM itself needs an interpretation itself! Why?
Quantum mechanics so successful that it can explain all quantum phenomena!
![Page 47: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
What is this thing called wavefunction?
Copenhagen Interpretation (1927):
Heisenberg BohrMax Born
![Page 48: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
(1) = Probability density
(2) Measurement (or disturbance) causes wavefunction collapse.
Remember: Newtonian mechanics is deterministic!Probability occurs in Newtonian mechanics Too, but in a different context, e.g. dice
Probability =
![Page 49: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Double-slit experiment:
Feynman:
“…a phenomenon which is absolutely impossible to explain in any classical way, and which has in it the heart of quantum mechanics. In reality, it contains the only mystery.”
![Page 50: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Double-slit experiment with electron:
An electron is interfering with itself, not with other electrons!
Electrons: C. Jonsson (Tubingen, Germany, 1961)Single electron: P. G. Merli et al. (Bologna, Italy, 1974)Single electron: A. Tonomura et al. (Hitachi, Japan, 1989)
Like dice
Tonomura et al. (1989)
![Page 51: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Wave or Particle?
Copenhagen (Bohr, Heisenberg, Born):
--- depends on how you observe it, before observation, it is just a quantum state represented by .
Not acceptable to many people!
![Page 52: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Source of the trouble: Quantum particles do not have deterministic
trajectories like classical ones. (Counterintuitive!)
So physical process cannot be understood in intuitive terms.
In the double-slit experiment, the photon/electron must go through both slits in order to form interference pattern.
![Page 53: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
If one tries to find out which way it goes, then no interference pattern will be seen, because…
Disturbance due to measurement causes
“wavefunction collapse”
But how does it happen?No answer from the Copenhagen School
![Page 54: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Superposition: If there are two routes by which you can go home, then you could actually go home via both routes!
Measurement: However if someone tries to find out which way you take, then they will find you on one and only one of the routes.
In everyday language:
![Page 55: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Einstein is very upset by the CopenhagenInterpretation:
(1) God does not play dice!(2) Is the moon there when no one is looking at it?
Einstein & Bohr, debating QM (1920s)
Hot and long debates with Bohr et al.
![Page 56: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
(1) One of the founders of the quantum concept
(2) A first, thought there must be something wrong with the quantum theory.
(3) After much debate with Bohr, he finally was convinced that QM gives correct results, but it could not be the final theory. It is incomplete!
Einstein:
![Page 57: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Einstein’s last attack on QM:
Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (1935):
“Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?
![Page 58: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
EPR:“if, without in any way disturbing a system, we can predict with certainty the value of a physical quantity, then there exists an element of physical reality corresponding to this physical quantity.”
EPR Paradox: Issue unsolved!
Two-body superposition 1: red, 2: blue
“Entangled state”
![Page 59: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Schrodinger’s Cat (1935, after EPR)
Schrodinger was also not satisfied with the probabilistic interpretation…
What if: cat person?Descartes: ``cogito, ergo sum”
![Page 60: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Delay choice experiments
(John Wheeler)
![Page 61: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Bohr: “No phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is
an observed phenomenon” (…rephrased by John Wheeler)
Einstein: “You believe in a dice-playing God and I in
perfect laws in the world of things existing as real objects, …”
Bishop Berkeley (1700s): “to be is to be perceived”
Bohr: Before observation, one cannot attribute classical qualities to the particle.
![Page 62: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
What is reality or real object?
Is an electron in a state of
reality?
But this is philosophy!
![Page 63: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Hidden Variables?
Reasonable hidden variable theories are shown to be not possible!
![Page 64: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
John Bell (1964):
If 1 and 2 are separated by large distance, then measurement done on 1 should not affect that done on 2.
A. Aspect (1982):
Experiments show that that is not the case!
There is influence! In fact, it seems to be faster than the speed of light!
![Page 65: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Many-worlds interpretation (Multiverse)
Hugh Everett (1957)
Each line represents a history of particle or even person
![Page 66: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
R. Feynman:
“We cannot make the mystery go away by ‘explaining’ how it works. We will just tell you how it work.”
In other words, it is a black box.
“I think I can safely say that no one understands quantum mechanics”
![Page 67: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Actually, since 1930’s, most physicists just accepted the quantum theory as a useful tool, and do not worry too much about the interpretation problem, etc.
And by doing so, tremendous progresses have been made in many areas of physics:
elementary particles, atom, nucleus, solid-state, …, cosmology
~1,000 terms, improvement needs >10,000 more terms (2006/11/3)
![Page 68: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Applications of a particle’s quantum nature:
(1) Uncertainty and wavefunction collapse Quantum cryptography (1970, 1980’s)
(2) Wavefunction superposition
Quantum computing (1990’s)
Classical bit
Quantum bit
![Page 69: The Story of the Quantum](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062517/56813900550346895da0b866/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Conclusion
The mystery of the quantum remains
with us today as much as in 1920s.
No breakthrough is in sight, but …
Maybe none is needed.Maybe, that is the way it is!
And maybe, you will find one!