quantum limits on linear amplifiers i.what’s the problem? ii.quantum limits on noise in...
TRANSCRIPT
Quantum limits on linear amplifiers
I. What’s the problem? II. Quantum limits on noise in phase-preserving linear amplifiers.
The whole storyIII. Completely positive maps and physical ancilla states
IV. Immaculate linear amplifiers. The bad newsV. Immaculate linear amplifiers. The good news
Carlton M. CavesCenter for Quantum Information and Control, University of New Mexico
Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, University of Queenslandhttp://info.phys.unm.edu/~caves
Co-workers: Z. Jiang, S. Pandey, J. Combes; M. PianiCenter for Quantum Information and Control
I. What’s the problem?
Pinnacles National ParkCentral California
Phase-preserving linear amplifiers
Ball-and-stick (lollipop) diagram.
Phase-preserving linear amplifiers
Refer noise
to input
Added noise number
Noise temperature
added-noise
operator
output noise
input noise
added noise
gain
Zero-point noise
C. M. Caves, PRD 26, 1817 (1982).
C. M. Caves, J. Combes, Z. Jiang, and S. Pandey, PRA 86, 063802 (2012).
Ideal phase-preserving linear amplifier Parametric amplifier
Ideal phase-preserving linear amplifier
The noise is Gaussian. Circles are drawn here at half the standard deviation of the Gaussian.
A perfect linear amplifier, which only has the (blue) amplified input noise, is not physical.
Phase-preserving linear amplifiers
What about nonGaussian added noise? What about higher moments of added noise?
THE PROBLEMWhat are the quantum limits on the entire distribution of added noise?
Microwave-frequency amplifiers using superconducting technology are approaching quantum limits and are being used as linear detectors in photon-
coherence experiments. This requires more than second moments of amplifier noise.
Initial coherent state
Ideal amplification of initial coherent state
NonGaussian amplification of initial coherent state
Which of these are legitimate linear amplifiers?
Per-gyr falcon Jornada del Muerto
New Mexico
II. Quantum limits on noise in phase-preserving linear amplifiers. The
whole story
Harris hawkNear Bosque del Apache
New Mexico
What is a phase-preserving linear amplifier?Immaculate amplification of
input coherent state
Smearing probability distribution. Smears out the amplified coherent state and includes amplified input noise and added noise. For coherent-state input, it is the P function of the output.
THE PROBLEMWhat are the restrictions on the smearing
probability distribution that ensure that the amplifier map is physical (completely positive)?
This is hopeless.
If your problem involves a straightforward determination of when a class of linear operators
is positive,
FIND YOURSELF A NEW PROBLEM.
Attacking the problem. Tack 1
But we have no way to get from this to general statements about the smearing distribution, because
the joint unitary and ancilla state are too general.
Attacking the problem. Tack 2
Attacking the problem. Tack 3, the
last tack
THE PROBLEM TRANSFORMEDGiven that the amplifier map must be physical (completely positive), what are the quantum
restrictions on the ancillary mode’s initial “state” σ?
Attacking the problem. Tack 3, the
last tack
THE ANSWERAny phase-preserving linear amplifier is
equivalent to a two-mode squeezing paramp with the smearing function being a rescaled Q function of a physical initial state σ of the ancillary mode.
Attacking the problem. Tack 3, the
last tack
NonGaussian amplification of initial coherent state
To IV
The problem of characterizing an amplifier’s performance, in absolute terms and relative to quantum limits, becomes a species of “indirect
quantum-state tomography” on the effective, but imaginary ancillary-mode state σ.
Quantum limits on phase-preserving linear amplifiers
Moment constraints vs. indirect quantum-state tomography to reconstruct σ?
CW version?
To EndTo Immaculate
Western diamondback rattlesnakeMy front yard, Sandia Heights
III. Completely positive maps and physical ancilla states
When does the ancilla state have to be physical?
Z. Jiang, M. Piani, and C. M. Caves, arXiv:1203.4585 [quant-ph].
(orthogonal) Schmidt operators
When does the ancilla state have to be physical?
Why does the ancilla state for a linear amplifier have to be
physical?
To End
IV. Immaculate linear amplifiers. The bad news
On top of Sheepshead Peak, Truchas Peak in background Sangre de Cristo Range
Northern New Mexico
Immaculate linear amplifierOriginal idea (Ralph and Lund): When presented with an input coherent state, a nondeterministic
linear amplifier amplifies immaculately with probability p and punts with probability 1 – p.
.
T. C. Ralph and A. P. Lund, in QCMC, edited by A. Lvovsky (AIP, 2009), p. 155.
This is an immaculate linear amplifier, more perfect than perfect; it doesn’t even have the amplified input noise.
Immaculate linear amplifier
If the probability of working is independent of input and the amplifier is described by a phase-preserving linear-
amplifier map when it does work, then the success probability is zero, unless when it works, it is a standard
linear amplifier, with the standard amount of noise.
S. Pandey, Z. Jiang, J. Combes, and C. M. Caves, ``Quantum limits on probabilistic amplifiers,’’ arXiv:1304.3901 [quant-ph].
Probabilistic, approximate, phase-insensitive, immaculate linear amplifier
Probabilistic, approximate, phase-insensitive,
immaculate linear amplifier
Phase-insensitive immaculate amplifiers don’t do the job of linear amplification as well as deterministic linear amplifiers or, indeed, even as well as doing nothing. Perhaps, by dropping the requirement of phase insensitivity, they can find a natural home as probabilistic, phase-sensitive, amplitude-specific amplifiers.
V. Immaculate linear amplifiers. The good news
Moo Stack and the Villians of UreEshaness, Shetland
Phase-sensitive immaculate amplification of M coherent states
on a circle
State discrimination
I’m going to hand you one of two quantum states. You need to decide which one I handed you.
If you get it right, I will give you a one-week, all-expenses-paid vacation in Canberra.
If you get it wrong, I will give you a two-week, all-expenses-paid vacation in Canberra.
To avoid spending two weeks in Canberra, you will minimize your error probability.
Unambiguous state discrimination
I’m going to hand you one of two quantum states. You need to decide which one I handed you.
If you get it right, I will give you a six-month, all-expenses-paid trip around the world to any destinations of your choosing.
If you get it wrong, I will pull out my gun and shoot you dead on the spot.
I’ll let you opt out after you’ve examined the state.
You perform the USD measurement, which never gets it wrong, but has an extra outcome where you make no decision.
Reality check: We must be in the United States.
For input coherent states this far apart, you could do perfect immaculate amplification with arbitrarily large gain and with a working probability of 1/2. You would get higher working probabilities for initial states further apart.
Phase-sensitive immaculate
amplification of M coherent states on a
circle
Echidna Gorge Bungle Bungle Range
Western Australia
That’s it, folks! Thanks for your
attention.
Ideal phase-preserving linear amplifierModels
● Parametric amplifier with ancillary mode in vacuum
● Simultaneous measurement of x and p followed by creation of amplified state
● Negative-mass (inverted-oscillator) ancillary mode in vacuum
● Master equation
E. Arthurs and J. L. Kelly, Jr., Bell Syst. Tech. J. 44, 725 (1965).
R. J. Glauber, in New Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory, edited by D. M. Greenberger (NY Acad Sci, 1986), p. 336.
C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise, 3rd Ed. (Springer, 2004).
● Op-amp: another kind of linear amplifierA. A. Clerk et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010).