The Spring Branch Coalition of The Coalition of Behavioral Health ServicesDrug Free Communities GrantProject Director: Dr. Sandy Olson, Ph.DEvaluation Firm: Knowledge Informatics and Research ServicesLead Evaluator: J. Valdez

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Source: COMET Reporting System Logic Model

Source: COMET Reporting System Logic ModelThe Spring Branch Community, specifically the north of I-10 side.

Adolescents, specifically those ages 12-17 and in Grades 6 through 12.

Hispanics and those of low socioeconomic status.

CDFSB (N=11) Locally Developed Community Stakeholder Survey

Source: 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12

Source: 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12

Source: 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12

Source: 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12

Source: 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12Remember this speaks of Region 6 Schools and without a power analysis it, we can not say much statistically. But we can use this as a baseline expectation.

We should expect alcohol to be the most used substance for kids as young as 10 yrs old and very likely about a 1/3 of kids 15 or older will likely be using alcohol.

Parents are delivering the message of their disapproval, but are becoming complacent or burning-out on stating their disapproval as children grow older, concerning alcohol.

The substance use is harmful message is out there to about of kids grades 7-12, but parental fatigue for stating their disapproval, risk taking is being sought by younger children, and counter message experience is causing the harm message to wane in terms of impact.

Justifies efforts that go beyond the conventional deliver the message of harm approach, and should also be augmented by efforts derived by strategies that can impact the environment.

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Ranking for Geographical Priority TargetingVariable(All)Row LabelsLocal SurveyRegion VISpring Branch ISDAlcoholGendersF2.00M2.00GradesG065.00G0710.002.00G083.0011.00G0913.00G1015.00G1116.00G1214.00MarijuanaGendersF1.001.00M4.004.00GradesG063.00G071.003.00G084.002.006.00G093.005.002.00G103.004.007.00G111.007.00G126.008.00TobaccoGendersF3.002.00M3.00GradesG062.00G072.004.00G083.003.00G098.001.00G109.005.00G113.0012.00G1217.00

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 1CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey 2

Remember this analysis assumes establishment of problem issues at Region 6, SBISD Schools, and Community Area Surveyed and without a power analysis it, we can not say much statistically. But we can use this as a baseline expectation.

Coalition Policy (Regional Level) efforts should try targeting efforts to pass policy preventing adolescents of post driving age and alcohol issues.

Augments efforts that utilize limited resources through the efficient implementation of strategies that can most impact the environment in which the highest concentration of problem issue is contained.

Source: Region VI - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12 Spring Branch ISD - 2008 Texas School Survey of Substance Use: Grade 7-12CDFSB (N=66 ) Locally Adapted CTC 2002 Student Substance Use Survey

Coalition Partner Network (SBISD level) efforts should try assisting or promoting activity and time targeting risk and protective factors for Males use of Alcohol and Marijuana, specifically those in the Seventh and Ninth grades.Coalition (Local level) efforts should try prevention activities that target Eleventh Grade Females use of Marijuana, Seventh Grade females use of Tobacco and Alcohol, followed by female of all grade use of all three substance.

Web based system designed to help your Coalition use SAMHSA's Strategic Prevention Framework (SPF)5 SPF stepsAssessmentCapacityPlanningImplementationEvaluationRequired progressreports submitted through COMETManages your Coalition more effectively

Target Risk FactorsCommunityFactors inthe community that fosters drug useFamilyFactors in the home that fosters drug useSchoolFactors in school that fosters drug usePeer- IndividualFactors dealing with friends and peers of the child

Target Risk FactorsCommunityFactors inthe community that fosters drug useFamilyFactors in the home that fosters drug useSchoolFactors in school that fosters drug usePeer- IndividualFactors dealing with friends and peers of the child

Coalition ActivitiesNeeds AssessmentNeeds of the grantCommunity AssessmentOverall look at the communityCommunity Events and MeetingsAny event that helps solve the problemCoalition MeetingsThis meeting today, discussion of grantCoalition Evaluation MeetingsEvaluation of efforts in communityCollection of Baseline DataCollection of data in community for evaluationLegislative IssuesIssues brought to State House floor for next season

Risk and protective factorsKeeping in line with coalition factors and those in the narrativeCombining factors that overlapAssessment activitiesKnowing what activities that have been done by the coalition and what activities are planned for the futureAlso which activities are improving the community and which are not working or negatively impacting the community

*********************He we have three maps :

Most left and top @(0,0) is a mapping of geocoded narcotic crime (2005-2009) per Census 2000 population density in a light to dark percentage gradient (as show in legend below map) with a darken red boarder highlighting the Spring Branch area zipcodes (77080 and 77055),

2nd on the right we have two maps

the upper map shows a red heat intensity clustering of SA related crimes incident (shown as the yellow torch within a blue exterior circle) by census 2000 census track population density,

the lower map displays a geocoded snapshot (super-neighborhood/census 2000 census tracks/zip code) taken of TABC site licensure data taken in 12/2008 with symbols for TABC licensed geocoded sites having licenses not soon or past an expiration date as a white inner symbol within a dark exterior and those symbols that are displayed in a reverse coloring (dark inner symbol within a white circular exterior) represents those geocoded sites with TABC licenses end dates within target window (0m-06m) for TABC license end dates (a heat intensity clustering of the distribution of all TABC sites per Census 2000 census track population density using same red grades as upper map is also shown on this lower map, but the results of the analysis had too little variation and was too uniform to provide any indication of high concentration in TABC license site distribution)

Parallel SA crime concentration and geocoded TABC licensed site distribution patterns occur when overlayed by eye, but further analysis need to be done.**