the romanian rd&i system in the liubljana process perspective

THE ROMANIAN RD&I SYSTEM IN THETHE ROMANIAN RD&I SYSTEM IN THELIUBLJANA PROCESSLIUBLJANA PROCESS PERSPECTIVE PERSPECTIVE

National Authority for Scientific ResearchMinistry of Education, Research, and Innovation

Bucharest, 29 October 2009

OUTLINEOUTLINE

I. THE RD&I SYSTEM IN IN ROMANIA (Marian Enachescu)

1. Characterization 2. Main results 3. Challenges

II. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FRAMEWORK OF FP7 (Anca Ghinescu)

III. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS

1. Better Careers and More Mobility for Researchers (Adrian Curaj) 2. Research Infrastructures (Ionel Andrei)

& Structural Funds for RDI Projects (Dana Gheorghe) 3. Romanian RD in Support to JTIs and Future JPs (Rolanda Predescu) 4. Intellectual Property Protection (Rolanda Predescu)

Bucharest, October 29, 2009






& Structural Funds for RDI projects (Dana Gheorghe) 3. Romanian RD in Support to JTIs and Future JPs (Rolanda Predescu) 4. Intellectual Property Protection (Rolanda Predescu)


OUTLINEOUTLINE

GOVERNMENT ......

Ministry A

Ministry B

Ministry of Education, Research, and Innovation (MERI)

National Authority for Scientific Research (ANCS)

I.1. RD&I system in Ro - I.1. RD&I system in Ro - characterization:characterization: National Authority for Scientific Research

Mission:Mission:

To ensure the elaboration, application, monitoring and evaluation of the policies in the field of research, technology development and innovation, consistent with the strategy and the Governing Programme,

for the purpose of ensuring the enlargement of the national and international techno-logical and innovation patrimony, the sustainable economic development, the access on the internal, European and global markets, the creation of the informational knowledge-based economy, the satisfaction of the citizens' needs and growth in the quality of their lives.


I.1. RD&I system in Ro - I.1. RD&I system in Ro - characterizationcharacterization: Main chart “ “ financial flows


Innov. Council

UniversitiesUniversities

Romanian AcademyBranch AcademiesRomanian Academy

Branch Academies

National RD InstitutesNational RD Institutes

EnterprisesEnterprises

GOVERD0.41% GDP

BERD0.18%GDP

IFAAMCSIT

EU fundsContributionsto EU AB-RD&I

CNCSISCRIC

Outsourced RD&I

Core progr.

Other Ministries(sectoral progr.)

Private grants

UEFISCSU CNMP

In-house RD&I

MERI – ANCS National Plan

Consulting bodies

Executive agenciesRo.

Acad.

ANCSIntermediate

Body SOP-IEC

I.1. RD&I system in Ro - I.1. RD&I system in Ro - characterization:characterization: Structure


SectorLevel

Public Public-private interface

Private

Policy

- MERI-ANCS (National Strategy and Plan ‘07-’13)- Other ministries (now 5 sectoral plans are running) - ST Policy Council (policy mix – subject to significant improvement)

Advisory bodies: - CNCSIS - Adv.Board for RD&I - Innovation Council - CRIC

ST foresight (2005-2006)

- Confederation of employers - Trade unions

Still lacking a fruitful dialog with powerful companies

Financial4 funding agencies(GOVERD 0.41% GDP in ’08)

- UEFISCSU- AMCSIT- CNMP- IFA (limited role)

„Public private” - Project calls - Contractual outsourcing via public-private partnerships- Fiscal incentives (120% deducibility)

„Private public” Private grants (3 major foundations)

- “In house” RD&I (~ 0.18% GDP in ‘08)

- Venture funds

- Credits

Operational

- 56 public universities- 66 organizations of the Romanian Academy - Other 96 research org. (medical, agricultural)

- 46 National RD&I institutes- ~ 40 entities in the National Network for Tech. Transfer (ReNITT)

~ 1000 organizations - enterprises - research institutes - private universities - NGOs, foundations

I.1. RDI system in Ro - I.1. RDI system in Ro - characterization:characterization: Structure &processes

Government

RD&I policy Ministry of Education, Research and Innovation (MERI) - National Authority for Scientific Research (ANCS)

Other ministries

Romanian Academy

Branch Academies

ST Policy Council, Consulting bodies (CNCSIS, Adv.Board-RD&I, Innov. Council, CRIC), Groups of experts, ST foresight

Consultation

National RDI ProgrammesInstruments

Executive agencies: UEFISCSU, CNMP, AMCSIT, IFA, Intermediate BodyImplemen-

tation

Public UniversitiesBranch Academies

InstitutesRomanian Academy

Institutes

PrivatePrivate

UniversitiesResearch Institutes

EnterprisesAssociations, Foundations

GrantsNational RDI Plan Core Progs. Sectoral Progr.

European Progs. Other


Other FP 7 SOP-IEC CERN,…

OperationNational

R&D Institutes

ReNITT

ELI,…

I.1. RD&I system in Ro - I.1. RD&I system in Ro - characterizationcharacterization: National Strategy 2007-2013

Bricks of the 2007-2013 RD&I policy

Internal: First national wide-spreading foresight exercise

External: Accession to EU Na

tio

na

l Str

ate

gy

Nat

ion

al P

lan

Creating and developing S&T knowledge

Strategic Objectives Increasing competitiveness of Ro. economy

Raising quality of life


...

Implementation: National Plan ’07-’13 and synergical programmes as well.

Basic assumption: Towards 1% of GDP until 2013 ?

Na

tio

na

l S

tra

teg

y

Na

tio

na

l P

lan

I.1. RD&I system in Ro - I.1. RD&I system in Ro - characterizationcharacterization: National Plan 2007-2013

Principles: Multi-annual allocation, pre-financing, investment model

Programme 1. Human ResourcesIncreasing the number of researchers and improving their professional performances

Programme 2. CapacitiesDevelopment of RDI infrastructures and their better connection and use at national and international level

Programme 3. Ideas Generation of high level S&T results, contributing to a higher international visibility and recognition for Romanian research

Programme 4. Partnerships in priority RD&I fieldsPromotion of ST partnerships leading to innovative technologies, products and services for solving complex problems in key application areas

Programme 5. InnovationPromotion of industry-led research, technological development and innovation, based on the absorption of research results, for improving economic competitiveness and the quality of life

Programme 6. Institutional performancePromoting the continuity and stability of RD institutions, through the development of their own strategies, in accordance with the National RD&I Strategy


I.1. RD&I system in RoI.1. RD&I system in Ro - - characterizationcharacterization: synergical instruments


Research of Excellence programme (CEEX, 2005-2008), to structuring and building the Romanian Research Area in order to become fully compatible with the European and international standards of performance.

Core RD programmes of the national RD institutions, in order to sustaining long-term strategic objectives, specific to the sectors in which these institutions are performing.

Sectoral Operational Programme for “Increasing the Economic Competitiveness” Priority Axis 2 – „Increasing the economic competitiveness through research and innovation” (SOP-IEC), to increasing the Romanian enterprises productivity and reducing the productivity gaps with respect to EU 27 by the following channels:

- increasing the research capacity by the development of research infrastructures and by attracting young people and highly qualified specialists;

- strengthening the knowledge supply from universities and RD institutes;

- stimulate technology transfers based on the cooperation between RD institutions and enterprises;

- stimulate innovation demand from enterprises.

Three programmes focused on basic research of the Romanian Academy

I.1. RD&I system in RoI.1. RD&I system in Ro - - characterizationcharacterization: system capacity


Increasing trends …BUT comparing to UE-27 (2007)• The share of researchers in total employment

35,2%oo in Romania << 92%oo UE 27 • The share of employees from RD activities in total employment

47,9 %oo in Romania << 155%oo UE 27.

Indicator Unit Reference 2006

2008

1 Employees from RD activity # 42 220 43 502

2 Researchers from RD activity # 30 122 30 864

3 PhDs # 12 309 14 228

4 Public investments in RDI infrastructure (share of public RD expenditure)

MLei(%)

115 700

(10.1)

728 600

(35.0)

Source: INS 2009

I.2 RD&I system in Ro - I.2 RD&I system in Ro - resultsresults: output dynamic

Indicator Unit Reference 2006

2008

1 ISI indexed Romanian journals # 11 54

2 National patents applications / granted # 965 / 527 867 / 484

3 International patents applications / granted (EU, USA, Japan)

# 38 / 11 NA*)

However is low

4 Scientific articles published in ISI indexed journals

# /year 5 030 8 938

5 Citations # /year 18 038 26 966

Source: ANCS, ISI Web of Knowledge - Thomson Reuters, Eurostat


Excepting the patent statistic, the trends are positive

Specific policy measures:• Rewarding the authors of ISI publications and patents.• Improving the RD&I managerial skills by supporting specific actions e.g. training, international mobilities etc.

I.2 RD&I system in Ro - I.2 RD&I system in Ro - resultsresults: positive impact on economy

Indicator Unit Reference(year)

Last value (year)

1 Business expenditure for RD (BERD) as share of GDP

% 0.14(2006)

0.18(2008)

2 Share of enterprises with innovation activities (Community Innovation Survey - INS)

% 19.3(2004)

21.2(2006)

3 Share of employees in High-Tech manufacturing industry

% of totaloccup.

0.4(2004)

5.66(2007)

4 Share of employees in knowledge-intensive services

% of totaloccup.

1.5(2004)

14.40(2007)

5 High-Tech exports % of total exports

3.8(2004)

3.8(2006)

6 SME’s accessing public RDI funds via the national programmes*) #

600(2006)

810(2008)

7 ST parks*)

# 7(2006)

4(2008)

Sources: INS, *)ANCS, Eurostat



I.2 RD&I system in RoI.2 RD&I system in Ro - results - results: significant achievements

• Among the highest growth rates in Europe of some of the indicators related to innovation (e.g. share of employees in knowledge-intensive services, organizational innovation, share of innovative enterprises)

“… Bulgaria and Romania have been improving their performance the fastest.”(EIS 2008-Comparative analysis of innovation performance, 2009)

• Increase of BERD (but caution, because GDP diminished in 2008)

• Significant investments in RD infrastructure (in the first two years ’08-’09, the programme Capacities accounted for the largest share of expenditure with respect to its total, multi-annual budget)

• New or new levels of international collaborations (pan-European research infrastructures, candidacy to CERN, supporting the FP7 Ro partners etc.)

• Significant improvements of the quality of human resources (frontier research in the Ro Ideas programme, supporting the mobility of researchers via the Human Resources programme and billateral cooperation etc.)


I.2 RD&I system in RoI.2 RD&I system in Ro - results - results: significant achievements • More than half of the number of researchers are still belonging to exact, natural, and engineering sciences

The effectiveness is obvious, but again, comparing with UE-27

• The share of HiTech exports in total exports3.80% in Romania << 15.96% UE 27

• The share of personnel working or with tertiary education in ST fields in total employment

22.97% in Romania << 39.25% UE 27. • The share of employees in HiTech and Mid-Tech manufacturing in

total employment 5.66% in Romania < 6.69% UE 27 close enough

• The share of employees in knowledge based services in total employment

14.40% in Romania << 32.94% UE 27.


I.2 RD&I system in Ro I.2 RD&I system in Ro - resultsresults: still to do

I.3 RD&I system in RoI.3 RD&I system in Ro - challenges - challenges

• Improve the absorption capacity of the RD&I system, including the structural funds

• Sub-optimal functionality of some public RD institutions - e.g. project and programme monitoring, lack of integrated info system dedicated to RD activities, resources, and outputs.

• Sub-optimal functionality of ReNITT

• Global crisis led to public under-financing

• Provisioned effects upon unemployment, so that the competition for Hum.Res. in ST will increase


Government RD Expenditure - share in GDP

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% GDP

According to the multiannual planning when launching the National Strategy

Spent budget (for 2009 - provisioned)

I.3. RD&I system in RoI.3. RD&I system in Ro - challenges- challenges: public funding


Government Expenditure for RD Activities by Main Actors

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2007 2008 2009

Mill

ion

Lei

MECI-ANCS Romanian Academy Other Ministries

??

Political decision on diminishing the share of ANCS inpublic financing hasto be balanced by:

• Improving the efficiency of RD expenditure

• Competing for other financing sources: private, EU, Asian etc.

• Improving the public acceptance for research and innovation

OUTLINEOUTLINE








II. International Cooperation in the Framework of FP7 –

Comparison to some member states and Turkey

Inhabitants (mil.)

EU contribution for national participants

(K euro)

EU contribution

at 1 mil.inhabitants

(K euro)

National participants in

project proposals


project proposals

per mil. inhabitants


projects retained for

funding


projects retained for funding per

mil. inhabitants

Success ratefor

participants(%)

EU average contribution in funded proiect

(K euro)

RO 21,6 41.009 1.947 2.207 102 313 15 14,18 131

BG 7,7 26.161 3.398 1.452 189 252 33 15,98 104CY 0.8 12.302 15.378 641 801 105 131 16,38 117FI 5,3 200.955 37.916 2.651 500 615 116 23,20 327

GR 11,2 222.656 19.879 5.757 514 888 79 15,42 251LT 3,4 11.870 3.491 575 169 95 28 16,52 119PL 38,1 97.508 2.559 3.177 83 570 15 17,94 171PT 10,6 85.864 8.100 2.447 231 445 42 18,19 193SI 2,0 39.359 19.680 1.439 718 226 113 15,71 174HU 10,1 59.028 5.869 2.209 219 414 41 18,74 143EU 500 7.302.781 14.606 113.985 228 24598 49 21,59 297TR 73,5 35.021 476 1.682 23 216 3 12,84 162RO/EU (%)

4,32 0,56 13,33 1,94 44,74 1,27 30,61 65,68 44,11

4,32% x EU 4,32% x EU 4,32% x EU

Alin. to

EU level

315.480 14.606 4.924 228 1.062 49 21,59 297


Table data source: interpretation of European Commission’s data by Romania’s Permanent Representation to EU. Statistics rely on the results of 90 calls of FP7 and available information up to January 10, 2009.

Conclusions Level of Romania’s participation in FP7 compared to EU average is low

if we take into account two factors:

I. weight of RO population to EU (4,32%)

II. RO GDP (close to 1% of EU GDP in 2007; increase from 48,4 bil. Є in 2002 to 115 bil. Є in 2007)

If we apply the ratio RO GDP/EU GDP of 0,98% to the budget of 7,3 bil. EUR for the 90 calls it results a contribution of 71,567 mil. EUR.

If we compare it to the actual EU contribution for RO participants in selected projects (i.e. 41 mil. EUR) we have a recovery rate of 57,3%.

II. International Cooperation in the Framework of FP7 – Comparison to some member states and Turkey


The NMS have a satisfactory participation to FP7

Lack of communication between potential cooperation partners and in consortium

More confidence is needed towards the NCP networks

Results of the first calls have shown up: level of integration into the ERA research capacity at national level integration degree in the EU strategies ability to find project partners success of NMS close connected to their participation in projects coordinated by EU 15

Structural funds – their efficient use could represent a major support in consolidating of strong S&T areas and NMS integration in the ERA

Guidelines for development of the National Research Strategies: Link with industry (ETPs) and increased cooperation with industry Research fields and themes in accordance with the National Research Strategy National Research Strategy harmonyzed with the European Strategic Research Agenda




• Information!– http//:cordis.europa.eu/fp7– NCP– ROST

• Identify valuable partners!• Pro-active attitude!• Knowledge and apply of rules!• Presence in FP7!

– Evaluators– Experts in working groups – “Register your organisation” - CORDIS

Key to success




E.C. COM(2008)317, “Better carriers and more mobility: a European partnership for researchers”

Working group on EPR in RO: set up on October 2009

Members of the WG relevant stakeholders for the 4 key areas: ANCS, UEFISCSU, CNPAS, MAI-ORI Mandate of the WG on EPR: contribute to the identification of the priority actions in line with the EC proposals and according to the specific situation and needs in Romania

Goals: - set up a National Action Plan with specific objectives and actions to achieve the aims of EPR

- support its implementation




OUTLINEOUTLINE

I. THE RDI SYSTEM IN IN ROMANIA (Marian Enachescu)







III.1. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS – Better Careers and More Mobility for Researchers


OUTLINEOUTLINE








State of the art (2006):

Romanian RD infrastructure below the European level

Sub-optimal use of the existing facilities

Concentration in the Bucharest region

III.2. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS:III.2. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS:

Research infrastructures


Specific measures in line with National Strategy & Liubljana initiatives:

Institutional: establishing the Romanian Committee for Research Infrastructures (CRIC)

Financial support: - Specific calls for research laboratories in universities - GRID based infrastructure under development by dedicated consortium

Operational: establishing regulation and operative rules to accessing the national and international libraries, facilities, and data bases




CRIC

Mission: Establishing the priorities for establishing, developing, and using the research infrastructures.

Role: Advisory body of ANCS in both positions of scientific council for the Capacities programme, and strategic consulting forum of the Ro scientific community. Activity: Drawing out of a roadmap to be followed in building and operation of such infrastructures, as well as accessing the

international research facilities.






CRIC roadmap established 19 national priorities,

advised Romanian contribution in 9 ESFRI-agreed pan-European facilities

- Extreme Light Infrastructure - ELI - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research - FAIR - Production and study of rare isotope radioactive beams - Spiral2 - Underwater Neutrino Observatory - KM3NET - European Bio-Banking and Biomolecular Resources - BBMRI, - ERICON – Aurora Borealis, - Research Infrastructures Network for Research in Biodiversity - LIFE WATCH - Council of European Social Science Data Archives - CESSDA - Common Language Resources and Technology Initiative – CLARIN

as well as the accession to

“Centre Européen pour la Récherche Nucléaire” – CERN E- infrastructures


OUTLINEOUTLINE








PRIORITY AXIS 2 KEY AREAS OF INTERVENTION OPERATIONS

2. Research, Technological Development and Innovation for Competitiveness

2.1 R&D partnerships between universities/research institutes, and enterprises for generating results directly applicable in economy

2.1.1 Joint R&D projects between universities/research institutes, and enterprises2.1.2 Complex research projects fostering the participation of high-level international experts

2.2 Investments in RDI infrastructure and related administrative capacity

2.2.1 Development of the existing R&Dinfrastructure and the creation of newinfrastructures2.2.2 Development of poles of excellence2.2.3 Development of networks of R&D centres (GRID, GEANT)2.2.4 Strengthening administrative capacity

2.3 RDI support for enterprises 2.3.1 Support for high-tech start-ups and spin-offs2.3.2 Development of R&D infrastructure in enterprises and creation of new R&D jobs2.3.3 Promoting innovation in enterprises


III.2. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS:III.2. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS:Structural Funds for RDI projects

BUDGET PRIORITY AXIS 2 2007-2013

• ERDF: 537 mil eur (21% of SOP-IEC funds)• State budget: 109 mil eurTotal: 646 mil eur

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1

mill

ion

eu

r

total Axis

launched until 1st Oct

contracted+ selected



No of submitted vs selected/contracted projects per operation

0

50

100

150

200

O211 O212 O221 O222 O223 O224 O231 O232 O233

submittedselected/contracted



Submitted 646 projects

Contracted 79 projects

To be contracted 147 projects

Total Axis

OUTLINEOUTLINE








III.3. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESSADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS – Romanian R&D in support to JTIs & Future JPs

RO / Participation in 4 JTIs: • ARTEMIS (embedded systems) • ENIAC (nanotechnologies)• IMI (innovative medicines) • CLEAN SKY (aeronautics)

RO / Intention of participation in 4 JPs:• HEALTH• FOOD• WATER• CULTURAL HERITAGE


• RD&I National Plan 2007-2013• The distribution of projects by S&T priority fields and by prog’s / Relevant domains

S&T PRIORITY FIELDS accor-ding to the National Strategy

Human Res.

Capa-cities Ideas

Partner-ships

Inno-vation TOTAL

New materials, innovative processes and products 378 57 187 228 159 999

Basic sciences 212 37 161 33 0 443Energy 46 25 62 136 25 294Biotehnology, biology and

genetics 47 18 45 105 5 220Socio-economic and humanistic

research 367 27 337 119 2 852Health 188 38 183 158 11 578ITC 215 40 125 138 30 538Agriculture, food safety and

security 98 32 116 149 5 400Environment 96 34 67 167 28 392Space and security 16 23 4 121 20 184

TOTAL 1663 331 1287 1354 285 4920 / 2092 (42.5%)

III.3. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS -ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS - Romanian R&D in support to JTIs & Future JPs: Synergic

support for participation

• RD&I National Plan 2007-2013/ Programme Capacities • 2008/ Total value: 242.2 Mlei (~ 60.5 MEur)• The distribution of investment projects for RD infrastructures by ST priority fields / Relevant domains

S&T PRIORITY FIELDS according to the National RD&I Strategy

Module 1(RD Infrastructures)

ICT 25Health 24Environment 19Agriculture, food safety and security 18Space and security (+ aeronautics) 12Socio-economic and humanistic research 6Materials, innovative processes and products 38Basic Sciences 22Energy 10Biotechnologies, biology and genetics 5Total 179 / 104 (58%)

III.3. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS -ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS - Romanian R&D in support to JTIs & Future JPs: Synergic



International support / RO participation in

16 ERA NETs (including SEE EraNet+) 9 ESFRI projects (including ELI, FAIR) 8 ETPs (including hydrogen & fuel cells,

photovoltaics, “Food for life”)

III.3. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS -ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS - Romanian R&D in support to JTIs & Futur JPs: Synergic



CLEAN SKY– NATIONAL R&D INSTITUTE FOR AEROSPACE «ELIE

CARAFOLI» - INCAS BUCHAREST / WWW.INCAS.RO

ENIAC – NATIONAL R&D INSTITUTE FOR MICROTECHNOLOGIES –

IMT BUCHAREST / WWW.IMT.RO

– «MICROELECTRONICA SA» / WWW.MICROEL.RO IMI

– NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL R&D www.ncpri.ro

ARTEMIS─ THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY / RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE WWW.RACAI.RO

III.3. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS -ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS - Romanian R&D in support to JTIs & Future JPs: RD

organizations involved in JTIs


OUTLINEOUTLINE








National IPR Protection bodies:

STATE OFFICE FOR INVENTIONS AND MARKS - OSIM ROMANIAN OFFICE FOR AUTHOR’S RIGHTS - ORDA

• OSIM – receiving office for:

– National patents– EPs: applications according to the European Patent Convention

(EPC) (through OSIM for EPO) – Patents under PCT: applications according to the Patent

Cooperation Treaty (PCT)• electronic filing of patent applications (PDF) available (OSIM ORDER no. 112/21)• filings can be done using the EPO system: EPO Online Filing (EPO-OLF), with a smart

card issued by EPO• OSIM continues to accept traditional filings on paper

III.4. ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS -ADAPTING TO THE LIUBLJANA PROCESS - Intellectual Property Protection


NATIONAL LEGISLATION (I)

Patents

• PATENT LAW No. 64/1991* republished (August 2007)

• Law No 93/1998 on transitional protection of patents for inventions

• Law No 11/1991 on the repression of unfair competition Trademarks

• Law no. 84/1998 on Marks and Geographical Indications

Industrial design

• Design Law No. 129/1992 republished (December 2007)



NATIONAL LEGISLATION (II)

Utility models

• Law No. 350/ 2007on Utility Models Topographies of semiconductor products

• Law no. 16/ 1995 on the protection of topographies of semiconductor products republished (December 2005)

Plants varieties

• Law no. 255/1998 on the protection of the new plant varieties –republished (January 2007)

Government Ordinance no. 41/1998*) on the fees in the industrial property protection field

Law no. 8/1996 on author rights republished (August 2006)



Thank Thank you !you !


the romanian rd&i system in the liubljana process perspective

Documents

romanian rdi system

house rdi

national rdi institutes

field of research

scientific research

rdi projects dana gheorghe

ro characterization

future jps rolanda predescu