the quadrennial review process for staff scientists and staff clinicians
DESCRIPTION
The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians. December 16, 2009. QuickTime™ and a. decompressor. are needed to see this picture. Background. Purpose: To evaluate continuation/placement of the SS/SC For possible salary adjustment - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Quadrennial Review Process
for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians
December 16, 2009
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
![Page 2: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Purpose:• To evaluate continuation/placement of the SS/SC • For possible salary adjustment• To enable the SD to report on allocation of these personnel
Process:• Standardized to fairly evaluate SS/SC despite many roles
• PRP and CRP provide core expertise for the Quad Review Panels
• PRP/CRP review SS/SC appointments and promotions, know level of accomplishment expected
Background
![Page 3: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Review Criteria
• Scientific evaluation and determination of the overall contributions of the SS/SC to the research program of their PI
• Review period is the last four years (2006-2009)
• Review should be based on how the SS/SC fulfills their role in the Lab/Branch – whether it’s providing an essential core service, functioning like a PI, or giving scientific continuity to their PI’s program.
• Reviewers consider mitigating issues such as the scientific environment, mentoring (or lack of it) by the PI, a poorly prepared package, etc.
• Success can be judged through both independent scientific achievement and contributions to collaborations
![Page 4: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Performance MeasuresStaff Scientists:
Performance is measured against the following elements: interactions with other scientists, scientific productivity, other achievements, and evidence of being up-to-date scientifically and technically.Measures of performance include collaborations, awards, presented lectures, course work, mentoring/teaching, participation in Special Interest Groups, etc.
Staff Clinicians:
Performance is measured against the following elements: interactions with other physicians and scientists, scientific and/or clinical productivity, other achievements, and evidence of being up-to-date scientifically and clinically.
Measures of performance include patient care responsibilities, clinical skills, collaborations, awards, presented lectures, mentoring/teaching, participation in IRB-approved protocols, etc.
![Page 5: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Quad Review Package
You and your PI should assemble the package together.
Package contains: Check Sheet
Standardized Recommending memo from PI2 letters of recommendation from collaboratorsStandardized CV and biblioBSC RecommendationsReview Report
Packages are due to CCR ARC by Friday January 29, 2010.
![Page 6: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Staff Scientist Recommending Memo
Your PI is asked to describe your accomplishments in the following areas:
1. Scientific Productivity2. Scientific Presentations3. Participation in Special Interest Groups, Tech Transfer, Involvement in GMP production, INDs, etc.4. Collaborations5. Mentoring/Teaching6. Continuing Education (training programs participated in)7. Awards8. Other significant achievements9. Description of Core activities, list of collaborators and/or users: (For Facility Heads who are not reviewed by the BSC)
![Page 7: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Staff Clinicians Recommending Memo
Your PI is asked to describe your accomplishments in the following areas:
1. Patient care responsibilities and specialized clinical skills
2. Role in IRB-approved protocols3. Intramural collaborations and other intramural activities (faculties,
working groups, advisory boards, committees)4. Scientific productivity5. Scientific presentations6. Intramural/extramural activities (editorial boards, cooperative
groups, scientific societies, meeting organization)7. Mentoring and teaching8. Awards and other accomplishments
![Page 8: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Standardized CV
Membership in Scientific Societies/Professional Associations:Honors & Scientific Recognition: - Awards received - Fellowships received - Editorial Board of Scientific Journal - Reviewer for Scientific Journals - Membership in Reviewing Boards (grant application boards etc.) - Invited Lectureships - ChairpersonshipsFunding: - Grants and Funding Received - Technology Transfer - CRADA relationshipsPatents: - Employee Invention Reports - Patent applications - Patents awarded
![Page 9: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Standardized CV
Collaborations: - Intramural - ExtramuralScientific Community Activities: - Academic appointments - Mentoring - Participation in Intramural Faculties & Special Interest Groups - Participation In Intramural CommitteesClinical Trial Participation – role:Investigational New Drug (IND) Applications Submitted:FDA approvals:Consultant Appointments:Institutional Review Boards:Proposals submitted and approvedCore/Program Accomplishments:
PRESENTATIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
![Page 10: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SS Quad Review Panel
CCR PRP provides the core expertise: - 12 scientists representing a cross-section of CCR research meet monthly to review Staff Scientist appointments - familiar with accomplishments expected from Staff Scientists
- ad hoc reviewers are recruited to assist with the Quad Review
Three reviewers are assigned to evaluate each package - reviewers submit brief evaluations and preliminary score - reviews compiled and grouped by rank
Review meeting begins with a discussion of the review criteria - Individual packages are discussed - rankings adjusted taking into consideration mitigating issues such as scientific environment, mentoring, duties, etc.
![Page 11: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
SS Quad Report
Rank 1-1.9 Outstanding 2-2.9 Excellent 3-3.9 Good 4-4.9 Satisfactory 5 Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement in Productivity Collaboration Participation in faculties/special interest groups Scientific presentations Teaching/mentoring Continuing education/training Core activities Other
![Page 12: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SC Quad Report
RankTop 10% - Outstanding
Top 25% - Excellent
Top 50% - Good
Lower 50% - Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement inPatient care
Clinical translational research
Teaching/mentoring
Other
![Page 13: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SS Quad Results
50
Outstanding Excellent Good Satisfactory
Quad Review Scores 2006-2009
Nu
mb
er o
f S
taff
Sci
enti
sts
(T
ota
l 110
)
10
40
30
16
1
4648
20
![Page 14: The Quadrennial Review Process for Staff Scientists and Staff Clinicians](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56813ff7550346895dab1e43/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Due Dates
Packages are due to the CCR ARC by January 29, 2010.
The actual review will occur in March 2010.
Results will be sent out in April 2010.