the orchid review v.17
TRANSCRIPT
THE
ORCHID REVIEWDEVOTED TO ORCHIDOLOC
# # #
VOLUME
XVII
#
77;,
;/>/;
/
/"
it-
production
is
reset
]
Subscriptions for 1909 areVol. XVII.
now
due.[No.
JANUARY,
1909.
ORCHID REVIEW:En3ilustratefc
3ournal of rcbifcolo^
Answers
Corresponde Book, Notice of Calendar of Operatioto
record " under
t
Events of 1908 ... Notes ... John )ituary;
.-
32
PRICE SIXPENCE MONTHLY.
53NDER S 50N5ROYAL WARRANT
,
*3i
Largest Importers and Growersof Orchids in the World.vSmBSSsSHOLDERS TO THE..
.
KING.
William Bull ORCHIDS. & Sons WORLD-RENOWNEDHYBRID, ESTABLISHED AND IMPORTEDCatalogue free on application.
fa
KINO'S ROAD, CHELSEA, LONDON.
p
NOTICESORCHID REVIEWis
published regularly al the beginning of each month, let. Annua! Subscription, post free, 7/-, payable in advance. Volumes I. to XVI. can be supplied unbound at 6/-, or bound in cloth, 7/6, postage cAiirt. Cost of postage: book post, od. per volume; parcel post within the United Kingdom only, 5d. per single volume (series by weight). Also cases for binding either volume at 1/6 each, post free throughout the postal union All Subscriptions, Advertisements, Communications and Books for review, should bt addressed : The Editor of the Orchid Review, Lawn Crescent, Kew. Cheques and Postal Orders (sent as above) should be made payable to Frank Leslie & Co., and, to ensure safety in transit, should be crossed " & Co."iipplied
through the Trade
'ick
House, Paternoster Row, London, E.C
SCALE OF CHARGES FOR ADVERTISEMENTS.
ine Ji.a1r.0r interesting iteresting subjects s ten on one side of the paper only), also portraits, &c, of rar Advertisements and late news should be received not later
(wr
NOTICE OF REMOVAL.
CflflRLiESWORTHRAI5ERS,
&at
Co,
AND
GROWERS, IMPORTERS EXPORTERS OF ORCHIDS,Meaton, Bradford YorkJ
they opened their
NEW ESTABLISHMENT
HAYWARDS HEATHwhereall
correspondence,
etc.,
is
to be sent,
and from which addressin
all
business will be transacted
the future.
The Bradford Nurseries are
Closed.
THE ORCHID REVIEW.JANUARY,1909.
THE ORCHID STUD-BOOK.Itis
with great satisfaction that
we
are able to announce the completionlittle
of the Orchid Stud-Book, whose appearance has been awaited with no
impatience byIts object,list
many1
of our readers.is
a ? pointed out in the Preface,
" to provide an authentic
of existing Orchid hybrids of artificial origin, arranged on a uniform
system, so as to show at a glance the crosses that have already been
made, the adopted name of the hybrids, the worksflowering
in
which they have beenfirst
described and figured, the original raiser or exhibitor, and the date of
in short
it is
intended as a guide to the already vast literature of
the subject, and a standard of nomenclature."
Someout.
of the difficulties
met with duringarisenin
its
execution
are
pointed
" These
haveuniform
partly
through
the
same
hybrid
having
been raised independently
different
collections,raisers
but chiefly
throughall
want
of
a
system.
Someas
haveof
considered
the
seedlings
from the
same
cross
forms of one,
whilethe
others
have
given distinct names to
different seedlings out
same seed-pod.
Somethejoint
hybrids have received Latin or classical names, in accordance withor have
rules of binomial nomenclature,
been distinguished by the
names of the two
parents, while
others have
beenor
named
in
the
vernacular.
A
few have been recorded without names.lost,
In addition to this
there are
many hybrids whose parentage has been
whose records are
incomplete, contradictory, or erroneous.
Stray seedlings, loss or absence
of record of parentage, change of ownership of unflowered seedlings, the
contemporaneous flowering of the same hybrid
in different collections,
and
the naming of hybrids without reference to the work of earlier operators, have all contributed their quota to the confusion arising from themultiplicity of systems of nomenclature, and the object of the
work
is
to
provide a remedy for this confusion, so far as possible."
The work " Part I.been
is
divided into two parts
:
contains an enumeration of the species and hybrids which have used as parents, these being arranged in alphabetical sequence,
followed by the
name
of the resulting hybrid.
The name
of the
first
parent
"
[January, 1909.in
s
THE ORCHID REVIEWthe alphabetical series)allis
(in
given
in
heavy typeit
the centre of the
column, and
the species with whichleft,
has been crossed are arranged
alphabetically on the
with the resulting hybrid on the right.
Each
parent appears againof any given
in its
ownof
alphabetical position, and thus the hybridsallits
species appear
together.parents,
name
of the hybrid by
means
Having found the one turns to Part II., where its. . .
history
and other
details are given.
Part
I.
serves the double purpose of
indicating the
name
of any given hybrid
whose parents are known, and of
shewing with what others a given species has been crossed."
Part(3)
II.
contains
(1)
an alphabetical enumeration of existing hybrids,(2) (4)
each under
its
adopted name, followed by
thethe
names
of
its
parents, or
references to descriptions
and
figures,
name
of the raiser
exhibitor, (5) date of first flowering,in
and
(6)
synonymy, these being followed
a few cases by"
(7)
a short additional note.
A
few explanatory
details
are given under these several headings.1.
Names.
Ina
allis
cases
correct name, but this
not
we have aimed at adopting the earliest Part II. invariably the name first published.of
commences withasit'
few suggestions for securing greater uniformity
practice than at present exists, and the following paragraph
may be
repeated,
has been our guide throughout
:
Hybrids raised between species should receive
specific
names, Latin orShort
classical, consisting of a single
word
the use, however, of two short wordsthose exceeding six syllables being
being permissible where they can be connected with a hyphen.
names should be used
for preference,
considered inadmissible.'
\ names adopted are then given. " 2. Parents. The names of the parents are given in their alphabetical sequence, and in most cases where the seed parent is definitely recorded\ But in many cases the record is not clear, \ the sign ? follows the name.Some examplesof the
and where doubt exists the sign has been omitted. Raisers might help to and to correct any that are known to be fill up some of these blanks,References and figureslatterit is
may
be
left
to explain themselves, but of the
remarked
:
" Except in cases where they are unduly numerous, anlist
attempt has been made to give a completehowever, mere repetitions" Thiswillin the
of published figures, (avoiding,
same work)." The next point that we note is that of Synonymy, under which we:
findat
has proved
an
unusually
difficult
subject.
A
glance
page 97
show
that the well-known hybrid between Cattleya Mossiae
and Lajlia purpurata (Lseliocattleya X Canhamiana) has been recorded under nineteen distinct names, while Paphiopedilum X aureum has nearly The latter may be an exceptional case, and a good forty synonyms.
January, 1909.]
THE ORCHID REVIEW.
3
example of the wide diversity of character often shown by secondary hybrids (even out of the same capsule), which seem to defy all attempts to
name themand even
satisfactorily, but generally
speaking there has been a careless
reckless multiplication of
synonymy.still
or contradictory records have provedto ascertain
But hybrids with imperfect more difficult. It was impossible
whether they should be regarded as distinct or as forms of
and many such have had to be omitted because of the sheer impossibility of knowing where to put them. The records or the plants may exist somewhere, and if so we hope that the absence of the names will be detected, and that such information will be forthcoming as A similar difficulty may have led to will serve to clear up their history. some of them being inserted in the wrong place, and if so we hope the The synonyms are arranged as far as possible errors will be pointed out.somethingelse,
chronologically, which shows the history of any given hybrid better than an
alphabetical arrangement."
addenda down to the end of A paragraph relating to 1907, and a complete Index of Synonyms. omissions may be summarised by saying that a certain number of hybrids There are 120figures in half-tone, a long
whose parentage could not be ascertained have been omitted until the necessary information is forthcoming, and this should afford an opportunity for the ingenuity of our readers, which we hope they will not lose sight of.
The next paragraph is of general interest. " Secondary and more Complex Hybrids.complex parentage.hybridsit is felt
A great deal of
difficulty
has been experienced in dealing with secondary hybrids and those of more
Although we have treated them the same as primaryis
that the plan
not satisfactory.
Primary hybrids usually
combine the characters of their parents in such a way that they can easily be recognised, and the variations assumed by different individuals from the same seed pod or the same cross are seldom great enough to prevent them from being recognised, and had the matter gone no furthermost of thedifficulties
could have been got over with very
little
trouble.
But we now have hybrids of almost every degree of complexityhybrids recrossed with theirhybrids;
primary-
own
parents, or crossed with other species or
hybridsin equal four,
derived from two species in
which the
parents are
combinedspecies,
and
in
unequal proportions
;
hybrids derived from three;
from
and one even from
five species
and while some of thesein
complex hybrids vary enormously between themselves they also cases resemble others that are known to have been derived fromcrosses.
some
different
In short there are hybrids whose parentage cannot be fixed withtheir characters,
any degree of certainty by an analysis of
because of theis
amount
of reversion that has taken place.
Then
there
that
curious
complication that certain crosses which from their parentage appear to be
4distinct, yet
THE ORCHID REVIEW.on analysis proveidentical.
[January, 1909.
same hybrid may be obtained in two Odontoglossum nobile crossed with O. X spectabile would appeardistinct hybrid
put the case differently, the For example, different ways.to be a
To
from O.
X
Rolfeae crossed with O.
X
armainvillierense, but
an analysis of parentage shows that both are composed of half O. nobile, a quarter O. crispum, and a quarter O. Harryanum. The two have been leftunder their respective names of O.it
X percultum and
O.
X
Ossultoni, but
is
at least a question
whether they ought not to have been regarded asis
forms of one.perplexing facts
Andit
this
only a type of a series.
Owing
to these
becomes a question whether secondary and more complex hybrids may not in the future have to be treated in a different wayfrom primary ones, or atchains of hybrids thatflorists' flowers,all
events have to be classified separately.
Theup by
species in certain genera are
now becoming
so completely linked
we may have to treat these complex forms purely as selecting and naming only such as show distinct improvepredecessors and ignoring the remainder.inevitable in the near future."
ments onselective
their
Some
such
method seems almostis
Following the Preface
the " History of Orchid Hybridisation," inin
which the more important events are discussed and then comearticles
chronological sequence,
on "Generic Hybrids," the "Specific Composition
of Hybrids," in which the various grades of complexity are discussed, and
the "Variability of Hybrids." Six pages are next devoted to the " Literature of Orchid Hybrids," a chronological arrangement beingfollowed,
and fourteen others to a chapter on " Hybridising and Raisingof the
Orchids from Seed."
The bulk
work
is
naturally devoted to the enumeration of species
and hybrids used as parents, and to that of their hybrid offspring, which fills 312 pages, both being alphabetical the arrangement and details, \however, have already been mentioned.eleven closely printed pages, andis
The "Index
of
Synonyms"
fills
followed by the " List of Illustrations,"appropriatelyfirst
120 in number.
Thean
Frontispiece,
enough, shows a
fine
specimen of CalantheFinally,
X
Dominyi, thearrangement
hybrid Orchid raised by hand." Future
comes
for
Supplements,"
as
follows
:
" Itis
is
inevitable that a
work of
this kind, dealing
with a subject which
become out of The preceding pages contain the hybrids recorded up to the end of date. 1907, so far as their history could be ascertained, but a large number have been recorded since, and almost every meeting of importance bringsprogressing with such rapid strides, should very quicklyadditionsto
the
list.
It
is
intended to publish future additions in the
Orchid Review, sofor
as to prevent the
1908 have already been collected,
work from falling out of date. Those and a first instalment will appear in
January, 1909.]
THE ORCHID REVIEW.will
5
an early number of that work, after which the recordstime to time as the materials accumulate.tunity of correcting any errors that
be continued from
This
will also afford
an oppor-
may
be pointed out, and of including
any hybrids that have been omitted for want of information. It is quite probable that materials exist which will enable the origin of some of these doubtful hybrids to be cleared up, and it is hoped that any such informationwill
be forthcoming.
" In order that future recordsthatraiserswill
may
be as complete as possible,information
it is
hopedtheir
forward
the
necessary
respecting
productions, as they reach the flowering stage, accompanied by a flower asa voucher of authenticity, and this remark applies equally to any old hybrid
which has been overlooked or omitted, or whose origin has been incorrectly given. If raisers will compare the work with their own private records, and let us know the result, some important information may be elicited, for
we have reason
to believe that there are hybrids in existence
whose
origin
Hybrids that have not yet reached the flowering stage are outside the scope of the work.has never been properly recorded.
Schedule for Information respecting Additional OrchidHybrids.1.
Seedparent.
2.
Pollen parent.Raiser.
3.
Name
(if
any).
4.6. 8.
5.
Exhibitor.
Date of
first
flowering.
7.
Record of publication orexhibition(if
Any
additional information,
any).
1.
Calanthe Masuca.
2.
Calanthe furcata.Veitch.
3.5.
Calanthe
X Dominyi.p. 4.
4. 6.
October, 1856.
7.
Gard. Chron. 1858,
8.
The
first
hybrid Orchid
raised by hand.
"
The above
is
only intended as a rough guide as to the kind of informa-
tion desired,
and
its
arrangement.
Some
of the pointsto beit is
may
not be known,If,
and others
will necessarily in
some cases have
left
blank.
however,
there are doubts about the actual parentage,of accuracy this will be pointed out.raiser,
hoped thatis
in the interests
The
exhibitor
not always the actual
and sometimes theis
latter is
not certainly, known, but the complete
record"
desired as often as possible.is
The above form
obviously not suitable for corrections and criticisms
of existing records, which when necessary we hope to receive. " All communications should be addressed to the Editor."
6
THE ORCHID REVIEW.
[January, 1909.
EVENTS OF
I908.
In summarising the horticultural events of the past year
we may
first
mention the great Quinquennial Exhibition at Ghent, which also celebrated As usual, it brought together the leading the Society's Centenary. horticulturalists of Europe, while the display of Orchids was certainly veryfine,
and what
it
might have been
is
difficult
to imagine, for prizesfilled,
werein
offered in eighty-one classes,
though only twenty-seven were
and
several of these there
was only a single exhibit. The group staged by M. Firmin Lambeau, of Brussels, which gained the Gold Medal offered by His Majesty the King of the Belgians, was excellent, and that staged, not forcompetition, by Major G. L. Holford, of Westonbirt, was remarkable infeet,
every respect, occupying an area of over 300 square
and containing
many
very fine specimens and some brilliant
novelties
The group
of
hybrid Odontoglossums exhibited in a long glass case by M. Ch. Vuylsteke,of Loochristi,
was equally remarkable, nothing
like
it
having been staged
Other
Exhibitions.
The great shows held by the Royal Horticultural Society at the Inner Temple Gardens and at Holland House have never been surpassed, perhapsnot equalled, in the brilliant display of Orchids brought together, while theusual fortnightly meetings have rarely failed to produce a fine
show
ofof
Orchids,
or
some
brilliant
novelty.also
The Manchester and
North
England Orchid Society havevarious
had a very successful year, and the
Cup Competitions have
led to a keen but friendly rivalry, all of
which
testifies to
the growing popularity of these beautiful plants.
Novelties.
Theorigin,
striking novelties of the year have been almost exclusively of hybrid
and the progress which has been made
in
this
departmentof
is
remarkable, and seems likely to increase year by year.
A number
new
species have been described, several interesting in themselves, but nothing
of striking horticultural merit.
Several fine varieties of existing species,
however, have appeared, andccerulea Charlesworthii,
among them
the beautiful albinos,
Vanda
Cypripedium Charlesworthii Bromilowianum, andHybrids.
C. macranthum album.
Hybrid novelties have been so numerous that one hardly knows where One of the most brilliant, however, is Odontioda Charlesto begin. worthii, whose uniform crimson colour came as a surprise, considering thatone parent was the strongly marked Odontoglossum Harryanum. O. St.Fuscien, O. keighlyensis and O. Thwaitesii are also very promisingacquisitions.
Diacattleya Colmanise and Chondropetalum Fletcheri are also interesting generic crosses, though in the latter the Zygopetalum
January, 1909]
THE ORCHID REVIEW.Additions were
7
parent exerts a greatly preponderating influence.
made
to
most of the large showy genera, but as weelsewhere they
shall
have to summarise themto say
may
be passed over.
Suffice
it
that
among
the
complex hybrids of Cypripediums some striking novelties appeared, of them being certificated by the R.H.S.
several
interesting This genus has rapidly novelties were recorded, without reckoning varieties of hybrids previously recorded. Probably the most striking addition was O. X maculatissimum,
Odontoglossums. come to the front, for over a dozen
exhibited by
M. Ch. Vuylsteke
at
H. Grogan, Esq., from O. X J. the most interesting. O. X hibernicum, O. X Clytie, and O. X Eleanor, raised by Messrs. Charlesworth & Co., and O. X Zenobia, O. X Nerissa, and O. X Nemea, raised by De Barri Crawshay, Esq., were also attractiveadditions to thelist.
Ghent, while O. X Groganias, raised by Uroskinneri and O. Edwardii, was one o
Several others also flowered with Mr. Crawshay.
Certificated Orchids.
Thenovelties.
certificated
Orchids of the year contain a large proportion of Fifty-one First-class Certificates were awarded by the Royalgiven to hybrids,
Horticultural Society,, and of these thirty-eight wereeither
new
or of very recent origin.
and three varieties with nine, six of them hybrids, the others being C. Charlesworthii Bromilowianum,C.bellatulum,Exhim'svar., and the old Siberian C. macranthumten hybrids(the latter certificated
Odontoglossum heads the list, with of O. crispum. Then comes Cypripedium
under the name of C. ventricosum).
Of
the eight
Cattleyas four were hybrids, two of them being forms of the beautiful albino C. x Suzanne Hye de Crom. There were four Brassocattleyas, three
and three Vandas, including the beautiful albino V. ccerulea Charlesworthii and a coloured form of the species, two Odontiodas, both of them forms of the brilliant O. Charlesworthii, two Sophrocattleyas, and Genera claiming but a single two Cymbidiums, both forms of C. insigne, representative were Dendrobium, Calanthe, Phaius, Miltonia and Stanhopea, all hybrids but the last, which was a form of the fine old S. tigrina. TheLaeliocattleyas,
Awards
of Merit
we have
not attempted to analyse, nor yet the numerous
awards of the Manchester Orchid Society.
Some remarkablecomepages.
facts respecting
the
inheritance
of Albinism
haveour
to light during the year,
which have been very
fully discussed in
the object of obtaining albino hybrids, albino varieties of different species have been intercrossed, and now that the seedlings are
With
beginning to flower an unexpected condition of things has revealed itself, the hybrids having in many cases reverted to ordinary coloured forms.
Hybrids between Cypripedium insigne Sanders? and C.
X
Maudiae, C,
3
THE ORCHID REVIEW.i.
[January, 1909.
callosum Sanderse, and C.
Dorothy have
in
every case reverted to coloured
forms, while hybrids with C. bellatulum album have also partially reverted,as
shown by the
figures at pp.
104, 105 of our last volume.
Seedlings
obtained by crossing together albino varieties of Cattleya labiata have alsoyielded ordinary coloured forms, and thus were equally disappointing.
But
a batch of hybrids raised from Cypripedium
figures Sanderianum retained the albino character, as of C. X Rossetti with its two parents given at pp. 265-267 of the same volume. This seems to show that the two varieties of C. insigne mentioned, Sanderae and Sanderianum, are constitutionally much more distinct than would appear from their characters. Further observations on the
X Maudiae and C. may be seen by the
insigne
subject will be awaited with interest, for differences of opinion exist as to
the cause.
Ournamely:
Illustrations.have
Several novelties of the year
been illustrated
in
our
pages,
Chrondropetalum Fletcheri,
p. 56.
Cypripedium
X
Rossetti, p. 265.
Diacattleya Colmaniae, p. 80.
X Crawshayanum, Thompson's var., p. 177. Odontoglossum X egregium, Madame Jules Hye de Crom, p. Odontoglossum X maculatissimum, p. 169.Odontoglossum
209.
Vanda
ccerulea Charlesworthii, p. 361.
The female flowers of Cycnoches Egertonianum and Ccelogyne Mooreana have not previously been figured. Losses during the Year. Three well-known Orchidists have passed away duringdeath of the Marquis de Wavrin, of Ghent, in February
the
handsome
the year.
The
last, left
a blank in
the ranks of Belgian Orchidists, and his fine collection was sold during the
Ghent week.in
Later in the year another enthusiastic Orchidist passed away the person of Frau Ida Brandt, of Zurich, from whose collection we have
received
many
interesting Orchids,
and who had been a subscriber
to this
work almost from the commencement.
John Carder has been familiar to Orchidists for many years as an importer of Odontogiossums, but his death took place early in December. An Obituary notice appears onof
The name
another page.
So much
for the events of the past year, those of the
coming one cannotquota
be foreseen, but
we may
at least anticipate that
it
will contribute its
to the general progress of Orchidology.
The
preparations of the hybridist
are
now on a
vast scale.
May
the harvest be equal to his most sanguine
anticipations.
January, 1909.]
THE ORCHID REVIEW.
9
PAPHIOPEDILUM NIVEUM VAR GLORIA MUNDI.Theannexedfigure represents a
remarkably
fine
form of Paphiopedilum
niveum from the collection of E. D. Bostock, Esq., Holly House, Stone, Some Staff., and is reproduced from a photograph kindly sent by him. time previously a living flower was received, one of the finest we have yetseen of this beautiful species.
The
colour
is
pure white, with a few very
minute purple dots on the
petals.
The
species varies very
but large-flowered forms are rare, and prized accordingly.
much in size, The species is a
Fig.
1.
Paphiopedilum niveum var. Gloria Mundi.Islands, north of Penang,
native of the
Langkawi
where
it
is
said toit
growis
on limestone mountains, generally on the western
sides,
where
not
much exposedalso
to the sun
;
often in the crevices of the sloping rocks, butlike
seldom on the perpendicular escarpmentsequatorial zone, aboutin
many
other Cypripedes.
It
grows on the Tembilan Islands, another small group within the
midway between Singapore and Sarawak.
Growinghouse,
such a situation
it
naturally requires a light position in a
warm
with very careful watering.
io
THE ORCHID REVIEW.
[January, 1909.
CALENDAR OF OPERATIONS FOR JANUARY.By W.J.
Morgan, Rann Lea Gardens,
Rainhill, Lanes.will
Dendrobium Wardianum. Plants that have been properly rested pushing their buds, and in many cases flowering during this month.should be stagedin
be
Theytill
a light position, and given a
little
extra watertill
the
flowers are properly developed, and then kept aof flower,
little
drier
they pass out
when they can be removed to their growing quarters. Where a house cannot be set aside for them they will grow well in a plant stove or vinery. D. aureum, X Curtisii, X Doris, and a host of other hybrids willalso be pushing their flower buds,
and should be given similar treatment.
Where
several potting mixtures have been tried notes should be taken whilst
the plants are in flower as to which gives the best harvest of flowers, as
some mixtures
give fine bulbs but few flowers, whereas, inis
most
cases,
quantity of flower
the chief aim, so that
if
notes are taken whilst the
plants are in flower a satisfactory result can be obtained again next season.
Here we are always trying fresh mixtures and treatments during growing seasons, and I have found in many cases that flowers are better guides thangrowths, but generally speaking with DendrobesgetI
find the best thing
is
to
them growingis
as soon as possible after flowering,
and
them a long growing season, or give very high temperatures at any time. Where the Dendrobes are housedthey grow, thatgiveat present
them ripen and not rush themlet
as
give a temperature of 55 to 6o, plenty of moisture in the atmosphere, and ventilate on every fine or mild day. So long as it is donecarefully, a
we
good syringing
is
better than too
much water with
the watering
can, and also keeps the plants clean and provides a good growing atmos-
phere, but afterwards a
the day,
if only
for
must be given some time during half an hour, or spot will soon show on the bulbs andlittle
ventilation
young growths. Aerides, Angr^cums and Vandas are a beautiful class of Orchids, which have been rather neglected of late years, probably because the showyhybrid Cattleyas and Laelias have replaced them, and are more useful as decorative plants. In any case we do not see such fine specimens shown
was the case a few years ago. Many of the varieties are only of botanical interest, though some of the larger flowering species are very handsome when in flower. Practically the whole of them like a stove temperature, withas
perhaps the exception of Vanda coerulea, which generally does better in a temperature of about 6o to 65 Until we get brighter weather they should.
all
be kept on the dry
side.
Do
not dryto
them
so as to shrivel the leaves
;
just
enough water should be givento root again,
keep the leaves plump, until theygiven.
commence
when an ample supply can be
They
also
then enjoy a good syringing overhead on fine days.
During the winter
January,
1909.]
THE ORCHID REVIEW.with a smallscale,
11
months theyspongedoff
will get infested
which
if
not carefullyIf
soon disfigures the leaves, causing them to turn yellow.it
neglected this soon spreads, and ants will distributeplant or a batch of plantsif
over the whole of a
not checked.in
Spraying occasionally with alot
good insecticide
will
keep them
check and save a
of sponging, other-
wise they are not troubled with insect pests.the most part remain long in perfection.
They
are not difficult plants to
grow, and their beautiful and curious flowers are always admired, and for
C02LOGYNE cristata, and its var., &c, will soon be flowering,considerable time in perfection.
varietiesin
alba,
Lemoniana, Trentham,
a temperature of 65 and will last a Give enough water to keep the bulbs
plump, or the flowersleft
will be small,
and the plantsit
will suffer
if
flowers are
on long.
Where
the flowers are wanted for decorative purposes the
plants must be kept in a
plump
condition, or
will take a long
time to pull
them round again
after theystill
have flowered. These are generally termed oldin quantity,
fashioned Orchids,
where white flowers are wanted
they
are very hard to beat.
As a winter -flowering Orchid I do not see much chance of their being replaced by any hybrids, especially at the price Ccelogynes can be bought at, and they will grow in a cold frame during summer, only requiring heat during winter and at their flowering season. Scale seems to be the only thing that bothers them, and this can easily bekept
down by
spraying.
Miltonias.freely
Miltonia
vexillaria, Roezlii,
now
the days are getting lighter,
and X Bleuana will be growing and will make stronger growths.
Leaves which have been made during dull weather, and are weak, will soon strengthen with sunlight to help them, and a little ventilation will give themthat bronzy colour so
much admired by growers
of these beautiful flowers.
Those plants that were potted in the autumn will be well-established by now, and will require an abundance of water at the roots, as the sun willsoon help to dry them, andfire
heat has to be used pretty strong yet.it
Although the sun gives aits
little
help in the middle of the dayfires
soon loses
power, and
it is
not advisable to drop thefor,
much
until next
month.
and the plants sprayed or fumigated The best plan is to spray occasionally and preas soon as any are seen. vent them from making any appearance at all, for it saves a lot of trouble and at the same time prevents the plants from being disfigured. Frequentlyin dull
Thrip must be carefully watched
weather the young leaves
will be seen to
be stuck together, and
if
not released will be crippled.nail run
The handlewill
of a budding knife or
thumb
gently along the leaves will release them.
A
temperature of 6o
to 65
grow best in stove temperature. Keep a moist growing atmosphere, and ventilate whenever possible. Awill suit
them, but M. Roezlii
light spraying
overhead on fine days will keep the leaves
fresh,
and
also
12
THE ORCHID REVIEW.Do
[January, 1909.
keep thrip down.
not drown the plants; just a light spraying will
make them look happy. Cypripediums of thestage.
insigne class will mostly be past their flowering
once.
These should be examined and those that require potting done at Good turfy loam, crushed crocks, and one-third leaves suits this class
first-rate.
Some growers
object to using loam, but, in
my
opinion, there
is
no comparison between flowers grown in loam and those grown in peat. We have tried divisions of the same plant, grown side by side in the same house, under the same treatment, and in comparing flowers the loam-grownplants always
come much
finer
and make much
finer plants.
If locality
has
anything to do with growing Cypripediums,
there
ought to be
someget
magnificent results shown where pure air can be counted as an advantage.
Here we layfresh air free
in
a
very bleak position, and the only time that
we
from sulphur fumes
get bothered with thrip, so fogs for aftershift,all.
when the wind is perhaps we have somethingis
west.to
We
do not
thank the smokyyears.
Plants that need re-potting should be given a liberaldisturb
so as not to
them again
forif
at
least
two
Large
specimens must be carefully handled, androots, not just
not broken up they can bein
dropped into a larger pot, and lumps of compost worked
between thea plantis
pushed down to the bottom of the pot.
When
not
to be potted for
two or three years, it is worth doing well. Orchids are not much trouble to pot when compared with Chrysanthemums, yet how seldomwill
one sees Orchids, which
have to stand two or three years, well potted,
Chrysanthemums have been potted, which have only to stand in the same pot for two months, and yet the Orchid flowers will last longer than a whole batch of Chrysanthemums and will not want halfcarefully the
and how
as
much
attention.
If
only a fraction of the attention given in potting
other things was extended to the Orchids what a different resultsee.
we shouldfill
In potting
we crock our
pots as for ordinary plants, not half
them
with crocks, then gradually work lumps of material between the roots,filling
up with
finer
mixture as we go on, so that the plant has the same
rooting
medium
at the
bottom
of the pot as at the top.
We
do not top up
with moss, but just finish
off neatly
about an inch or so from the rim,has beenfor aI
according to the size of the pot.usingit
If the material
damped
before
will settle firmly,I
and not require wateringin favour of top-dressing.it,
few days after
potting.
am
not
much
would rather pot a
Cypripedium than top-dressthey are potted, as they areflowers are wanted they
as Cypripediums are so different in rootingIt
and growing from the majority of Orchids.
much matter when always growing and rooting. Of course if finedoes not
must be potted a reasonable time before their flowering season. Newly potted plants should be staged by themselves, then no mistakes will be made in watering. Syringe between the pots each
January, 1909]
THE ORCHID KEVlZW
\%
day, and overhead as well, and the plants will soon get established again, especially if the temperature can b?. raised 5 to io to help them to startagain.
If
Temperatures should be kept the blinds are run down at nightboileris
as even as possible during thisit
month.
will
be found a great help, especially
where a
not over large.
The
temperatures should run about as follows
:
Cool house, night 50
,
day 55,
.
Intermediate house, night 55 day6o. Cattleya house, night 6o, day 65.
Stove or East Indian house, night 65
,
day
7-
Houses should be damped so as to prevent a fiery smell being noticed when entering them, always remembering one is growing Orchids, not Cacti.Orchidswill not thrive in a
dry atmosphere.:
EPIDENDRUMWhen(O.R.xi. p. 6) it
x
KEWENSE A MENDELIAN EXPERIMENT.Epidendrum X kewense was described:
the interesting
six years
ago
was remarked
"
A
few flowers have been
self-fertilised,
and
if
the hybrid proves fertile the results should be specially interesting, for
Mendel's theory assumes that the gemmules of hybrids remain pure, andthereforeself- fertilised
seedlings ought to revert in certain characters."to nothing,
The
fertilised flowers
came(all
and
I
therefore fertilised the hybrid with
both
its
parents
being in flower together), and also reversed the crosses,p. 58).
with results that have already been described {O.R. xv.later,
Over a yearto self-
when
the plants were stronger, another attempt was
made
fertilise
the flowers, and this time a good capsule and abundance of seedsxiv. p.
were obtained (O.R.
272
;
xv. p. 58).its first
And now one
of the seedlings,
and with others, some of which are showing spikes, has been sent to Kew. The first result is that E. X kewense has reproduced itself true from seed, for parent and offspringflowers,
raised at Burford, has
expanded
resemble each other almost as closely as in the case of seedlings of a pure Whether the other seedlings will behave in the same way remains species.to be proved, so that further discussion of the subjectIt
may
be postponed.
may, however, be added that about six other spikes are showing, also spikes on the secondary hybrids between E. X kewense and both its original parents, while E. X kewense is already in flower, so that there should be some interesting material for comparison very shortly. Boththese secondary hybrids produced
weak
spikes last year, but the results
were held over
in the
hope that
this year a
more
definite opinion of the
whole
problem could be formed. It would be interesting to self-fertilise E. X O'Brienianum, for the parents show well-marked differences, both in floral
and vegetative characters.
R. A. Rolfe.
I4
THE ORCHID REVIEW.
[January,
t
9 o