WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.

The Namibian Chapter

Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020

Decade of Action cover.indd 1Decade of Action cover.indd 1 5/31/12 9:12 AM5/31/12 9:12 AM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. i

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

Table of ContentsFOREWORD ..................................................................................................................................... ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... iii

ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. v

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................11.1 Current Namibia Road Safety Situation ..............................................................................................11.2 Namibia Road Safety Strategy (2009-2030) ......................................................................................21.3 Global Plan for DoA ..........................................................................................................................2

2. HIGH LEVEL STATEMENTS ............................................................................................................3

3. STRATEGIC THEMES ....................................................................................................................4

4. OBJECTIVES & STRATEGY MAP ....................................................................................................64.1 Objectives.........................................................................................................................................64.2. Strategy Map ....................................................................................................................................6

5. UNDERSTANDING THE SCORECARD ..............................................................................................95.1 Scorecard Components .....................................................................................................................95.2 Defi ning good Performance Indicators (PIs) ......................................................................................95.3 Targets & Benchmarking ..................................................................................................................95.4 Initiatives ........................................................................................................................................10

6. COSTING & BUDGETING .............................................................................................................11

7. CSFS FOR SUCCESSFUL STRATEGY EXECUTION .........................................................................14THEME A: ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT [PILLAR 1] .............................................................................17THEME B: EDUCATION [PILLAR 4] ..........................................................................................................21THEME C: ENFORCEMENT [PILLAR 4] ....................................................................................................24THEME D: ENGINEERING: VEHICLES [PILLAR 3] ....................................................................................27THEME E: ENGINEERING: ROADS [PILLAR 2] .........................................................................................30THEME F: EMERGENCY RESPONSE [PILLAR 5] ......................................................................................34OUTPUTS & OUTCOMES .........................................................................................................................38

Decade of Action.indd iDecade of Action.indd i 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.ii

FOREWORD Over the past few years, substantive efforts have been undertaken in the quest to improve safety on our roads. These efforts are commendable though fragmented and incoherent. The Decade of Action therefore provides an ample opportunity for Namibia to consolidate her efforts for the sole purpose of making meaningful strides towards the reduction of road related accidents and their resultant agony and human mutilation.

In 2009, Namibia joined the rest of the world at the Global Ministerial Conference that was held in Moscow. The main purpose of the conference was to solicit global support for the implementation of the recommendations of the World Report on Injury Prevention published in 2004 by the World Health Organisation in collaboration with the World Bank. In addition, support was also solicited for the call for a global Decade of Action for road safety initiated by the Commission for Global Road Safety under the chairmanship of Lord George Robertson.

Subsequent to the Moscow meeting, the Ministry of Works and Transport obtained Cabinet approval for the implementation of the Decade of Action once approved by the UNGA. Cabinet further instructed the Ministry to develop comprehensive modalities through which the Decade of Action could be implemented. It is in response to the said Cabinet directive that this document was developed.

With the fi nal endorsement by Cabinet (Decision number 23rd/15.12.11/020), the Namibian Chapter of the Decade of Action 2011-2020, acquired the authority of a Cabinet directive with binding powers on all affected ministries, organisations and agencies as this is the time for all of us to make our inputs.

Now is the time for action.

Erkki Nghimtina, MPMINISTER Ministry of Works and Transport

Decade of Action.indd iiDecade of Action.indd ii 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. iii

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Namibian chapter of the Decade of Action 2011-2020: is a roadmap that outlines the focus areas, objectives and initiatives that NRSC and all road safety stakeholders in Namibia intend to take in order to achieve improved road safety for the period 2011-2020. This Plan, developed in response to the United Nations General Assembly’s call for a Decade of Action, provides an integrated picture of where road safety should be over the next ten years and serves as a communication vehicle for conveying specifi c direction, focus and allocation of resources in response to the country’s road safety challenges. This strategic plan was compiled in close collaboration with the key role players and will form the basis for performance management.

This strategy is based on the following key documents:

• Namibia Road Safety Strategy, 2009-2014 (NRSS)

• Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020 (GP DoA)

Development process: This strategic plan has been compiled through broad-based participation of road safety stakeholders, partners and supporters. The process of preparing this strategic plan began with the mini-workshop facilitated by Stratex Consulting on 3 March 2011 in Windhoek. Thereafter mini-thematic workshops were organised and attended by role players within a given function area during March 2011.

The Vision (from the NRSS) is: “The safety of all road users is ensured and that all necessary efforts are taken towards preventing traffi c deaths and injuries”

The Mission (from the NRSS) is: “To make Namibia’s road network one of the safest in Africa”

The seven core Values & Principles (from the NRSS), are:

Road accidents are preventable, Preservation of human life is above everything else, Total involvement of the community, Collaboration, Capacity enhancement, Sustainability and Socio-economic development.

If Namibia wishes to achieve its road safety vision, it has to perform in 6 Themes, viz.:

A: Road Safety ManagementB: EducationC: EnforcementD. Engineering: VehiclesE: Engineering: RoadsF: Emergency Response

A total of 18 objectives were identifi ed. The hypothesis is that if all these 18 objectives in the 6 identifi ed themes are achieved, we will realise our vision for road safety in Namibia.

The Road Safety DoA Scorecard is presented in Annexure A and takes the strategy map (‘strategy wheel’) and gives it more detail. The Scorecard therefore presents the detailed strategies that must be implemented, in other words the action plan. The Scorecard includes the following:

• The 6 Themes

• The 18 Objectives with accountabilities

• Performance Indicators (PIs) and Targets for each Objective

Decade of Action.indd iiiDecade of Action.indd iii 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.iv

• Initiatives with their priorities and responsibilities

• Cost estimates of all initiatives (expected total cost over the 10 year period)

• Scheduling of these initiatives over the 10 year period

SMART objectives are achieved through initiatives. Initiatives are defi ned as current and future activities or projects needed to meet the performance targets, as stated in the PIs and Targets for each Objective. Initiatives drive the strategic performance and are the means by which objectives are achieved. Initiatives are prioritised.

Note that capacity (in terms of human, structural, physical, monetary and relational resources) needs to be built in each theme to allow proper execution of the strategy.

The Figure below shows that the total strategic budget for this 10 year period is approximately N$747 million. The average total annual amount required to realise all initiatives in all Themes is approximately N$75 million. The total annual budgets vary from N$90 million in Year 1 to N$70 million in the later years. Themes B, C and F require the majority of all funding.

TOTAL N$ [000s] Theme Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y0112 900 A 14 920 14 331 13 981 9 781 10 281 9 981 9 781 9 781 9 781 10 281 152 800 B 18 850 18 450 18 250 14 850 13 250 13 250 14 850 13 250 13 250 14 550 223 500 C 23 550 23 550 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 35 800 D 4 600 4 400 4 200 3 200 3 200 3 400 3 200 3 200 3 200 3 200 83 400 E 8 740 8 740 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240

138 500 F 19 017 19 017 14 017 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350

746 900 TOTAL 89 677 88 488 80 738 70 471 69 371 69 271 70 471 68 871 68 871 70 671

The annual costs above are approximately double that of the annual budgets in the approved NRSS. It should be noted that the above strategic budget includes road safety element in budgets of MWT, MoHSS, MoE, MVAF and other ministries and organisations.

Critical success factors for successful strategy execution are presented in this Plan. Without these critical building blocks in place, it would be impossible to successfully implement this Strategic Plan.

Decade of Action.indd ivDecade of Action.indd iv 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. v

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

ABBREVIATIONS Acc : Accountability (for objective)ALS : Advanced life skillsBLS : Basic life skillsBSC : Balanced ScorecardCBO : Community-based organisationCEO : Chief Executive Offi cerCoW : City Council of Windhoek (City Police)Com : CommunityCRF : Central Revenue FundCSF : Critical Success Factor(s)Cust : CustomsDoA : Decade of ActionDS : Driving SchoolDTC : Driver Testing CentreEMU : Emergency Management Unit (in OPM)GIZ : German Development Agency?GP : Global PlanGRN : Government of the Republic of NamibiaGRSP : Global Road Safety Partnership, NamibiaHPSI : Health Programme Schools InitiativeHR : Human resource(s)ICT : Information and communication technologyILS : Intermediate life skillsIPOO : Inputs – Processes – Outputs - OutcomesIRMS : Integrated Road Safety Management SystemKAP : Knowledge, Awareness & Perception (survey)KM : Knowledge managementLA : Local AuthorityLM : Line MinistryMERIL-D : Measure, Evaluate, Report, Improve & Learn, all around Drive (Motivation) & Dialogue Mgt : ManagementMin : MinistryMET : Ministry of Environment and TourismMFA : Ministry of Foreign AffairsMIS : Management information systemMHAI : Ministry of Home Affairs and ImmigrationMoHSS : Ministry of Health & Social ServicesMICT : Ministry of Information & Communication TechnologyMME : Ministry of Mines and EnergyMoD : Ministry of DefenceMoE : Ministry of EducationMoF : Ministry of FinanceMoJ : Ministry of JusticeMoL : Ministry of Labour and Social ServicesMRLGHRD : Ministry of Regional and Local Government, Housing and Rural Development MSS : Ministry of Safety and SecurityMTI : Ministry of Trade and IndustryMVAF : Motor Vehicle Accident FundMWT : Ministry of Works and TransportMYNSSC : Ministry of Youth, National Service, Sport and Culture

Decade of Action.indd vDecade of Action.indd v 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.vi

NA : Not available or not applicableNABTA : Namibia Bus and taxi AssociationNAMCIS : Namibia Magistrates Courts Information SystemNAMCOL : Namibia College of Open LearningNAMPA : Namibia Press AgencyNANANASO : Namibia Network of Aids Service Organisations NANGOF : Namibia Non-Governmental Organisations Forum TrustNASOMA : National Social Marketing ProgrammeNaTIS : National Traffi c Information SystemNBC : Namibia Broadcasting CorporationNCAP : New car Assessment ProgrammeNDI : National Driving InstituteNDP3 : National Development Plan 3NPC : National Planning CommissionNAMPol : Namibian Police (NAMPOL), Traffi c DivisionNGO : Non-governmental OrganisationNMT : Non-motorised transportNOLNet : Namibian Open Learning NetworkNRAF : Namibia Road Accident FormNRSC : National Road Safety CouncilNSI : Namibian Standards InstituteO : ObjectiveOPM : Offi ce of the Prime MinisterPI : Performance indicator PM : Project managementPMBOK : Project Management Body of Knowledge (of PMI, USA)PMS : Performance Management System (of Namibia)PoN : Polytechnic of NamibiaPPP : Public-Private PartnershipPr : PriorityPriv : Private sectorQ : Quarter RA : Roads Authority of NamibiaRC : Regional CouncilResp : Responsibility (for initiative)RMS : Road Management System (of RA)RSF : Road Safety FundRSO : Road safety offi cerRSS : Road Safety Strategy (2009-2014)RTI : Road traffi c injurySADC : Southern African Development CommunitySARPCCO : Southern African Regional Police Chiefs Cooperation OrganisationSFA : Strategic Focus AreaSH : StakeholderSJO : Self/Jointly/Outsource (of initiatives)STRATEX : Strategy ExecutionSWOT : Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities & ThreatsTBD : To be determinedTC : Theme CommitteeToT : Training of TrainersUNAM : University of NamibiaV2030 : Vision 2030 VTC : Vehicle testing centreWBCG : Walvis Bay Corridor GroupWHO : World Health Organisation

Decade of Action.indd viDecade of Action.indd vi 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 1

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

1. INTRODUCTION1.1 Current Namibia Road Safety Situation

All over the world, road transportation, despite its immense contribution to the development of soci eties, has itself become a socio-economic problem in terms of the carnage and maiming it wreaks on people and property. The consequences of road ac cidents continue to drain the already scarce fi nan cial resources of nations in terms of damage to ve hicles, administrative and medical costs, and most of all, the unquantifi able loss of life. The rapid rise in the number of vehicles has contributed to in creased numbers of road accidents and injuries.

Worldwide, an estimated 1.2 million people are killed in road accidents each year, and as many as 50 million are injured. Projections indicate that these fi gures will increase by about 65% over the next 20 years unless there is new commitment to prevention (WHO 2004).

In Namibian currently approximately 300 people are killed every year in road accidents. This is just too high for the country’s low vehicle and human population levels. In addition to the current intolerably high number of lives lost, about 3 000 people per year are injured in these road accidents. As a result, our society is forced to bear the brunt in terms of huge costs that are estimated to be about 2% of our gross domestic product. It leaves a serious social and emotional scar in our communities. Road traffi c injuries are one of the leading causes of death among school going young pedestrians and are predicted to increase as we become more highly motorized.

2009 vehicle accident statistics in Namibia reveals the following:· No of annual accidents: 15 504

· No of annual injuries: 3 845 (MVAF)

· No of annual fatalities: 525 (MVAF)

· Regions: Regions with most ac cidents: Khomas - 55%; Erongo -12%; Otjozondjupa - 9%

· Urban/rural: although there were more accidents in urban areas than in rural areas, there were more fatalities in rural areas. Ohangwena which has the least registered vehicle population, had the highest fatality rate at 42.5 for every 10 000 registered vehicles.

· Peak periods: July had the most crashes followed by July. There are a equal distribution of crashes throughout the year. Most accidents oc curred on Fridays followed by Saturdays and then Mondays. Most occurred between 18h00 and mid night, and the next highest number occurred in the morning between 09h00 and 12h00. Most accidents with fatal and non-fatal injuries occurred between 18h00 and midnight, thus accidents tend to be more severe in the early evening and at night.

· Ages: The vast majority of the drivers killed or injured were between 25 and 49 years of age, thus a high number of economically active people were killed, injured or disabled. Also, a number of pas sengers were seriously injured.

· Vehicle types: Regarding the types of vehicles involved in acci dents, the majority were motor cars, and the next most common types were light delivery vehicles, sedan taxis and minibuses, in that order.

· Gravel/tarred roads: Accidents do not occur often on poorer (e.g. gravel) roads as drivers tend to be more careful, whereas on good (tarred) roads they tend to be more re laxed, thus carelessness, negligence and speeding are signifi cant causes of accidents. However, in ru ral areas there are many collisions with animals due to carelessness, negligence or speeding.

· Traffi c offi cer visibility: A lack of traffi c offi cers at dangerous or accident-prone spots is a contributing factor as drivers are more cautious where a traffi c offi cer is visible. A comparison of accident numbers in the morning when offi cers are present versus the evening when they have left these spots indicates that their vis ibility is vital.

Decade of Action.indd 1Decade of Action.indd 1 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.2

· Pedestrians & cyclists: Many pedestrians were knocked down while crossing the road, which points primarily to drivers’ disre gard or ignorance of road signs and/or pedestrians’ negligence or lack of knowledge of road use. Unescorted young children crossing streets at random is a major cause of pedestrian accidents. Of the total population injured in road accidents, 1.4%, pedestrians were fatally injured and of the 87 pedal cyclists injured, 5.8 were fa tally injured.

· Accident types: The most severe accidents in terms of the average number of casualties is the single-vehicle overturn, in which vehicle occupants are more likely than in any other type of accident to suffer serious or fatal injuries. Of all those killed in road accidents 36% were killed in this type of accident.

1.2 Namibia Road Safety Strategy (2009-2030)

The 5 year Road Safety Strategy that was launched in 2009 has been structured around the following outcomes:

i) Safer Road Users,

ii) Safer Roads,

iii) Safer Vehicles,

iv) Improved trauma and emergency care, and

v) Improved legal, judicial and administrative arrangements.

It recognised the importance of liaison between key stakeholders, including government departments, private sector organisations, local authorities, communities, as well as profi t and non-profi t making organisations.

Envisaged programmes include among others strategies to improve road safety through education and communication, community participation, traffi c enforcement, driver and vehicle quality, legislation, trauma and emergency care. Attending all these programmes is the need for proper organisational set up to drive the process of coordination.

The Strategy was developed at the time when road safety management has evolved drastically to the extent that adjustments to the traditional way of doing business became inevitable. To this end, evidence-based approaches were viewed in a safe systems approach to be the best operational model with further refi nement to provide a fi rm foundation for road safety improvement in Namibia.

1.3 Global Plan for DoA

As an active member of the United Nations, Namibia have been participating in many UN/WHO sponsored conferences on road safety. The country have followed with keen interest the outcome of the various platforms on road safety globally. Among the notable ones, Namibia attended the African Ministers of Transport and Health Conference which was held in Accra, Ghana in 2007 followed by the Dares Salaam, Tanzania Conference as well as the Moscow Global Ministerial Conference in Russia in 2009. All these conferences produced resolutions that oblige the country to put in place responding programmes and projects.

The DoA was agreed upon as means to marshal world support and meaningful action towards stabilizing and then reduce road traffi c related fatalities being experienced globally, especially in low to middle income countries who only account for a very small percentage of the world’s vehicle population. It is estimated that ninety percent of the global road traffi c deaths occur in low- and middle- income countries.

The Ministry of Works and Transport, as the portfolio ministry responsible for road safety, obtained Cabinet endorsement of the Moscow Declaration, thus paving the way for its full implementation in Namibia as per the Cabinet Decision number 4th/09.03.10/006).

The advent of the DoA necessitated the realignment of the Namibia Road Safety Strategy so as to allow synchronization of activities, resource optimization and to eliminate the possibility of running parallel programmes.

Decade of Action.indd 2Decade of Action.indd 2 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 3

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

2. HIGH LEVEL STATEMENTSVision:

The Vision is:“The safety of all road users is ensured and all necessary efforts are taken towards preventing traffi c deaths and

injuries”

Mission:The Mission is:

“To make Namibia’s road network one of the safest in Africa”

Core Values:Core values are the non-negotiable style in which Namibia will execute this plan, the style in which all will travel on the journey to realise our road safety vision. The seven Core Values & Principles, are

1. Road accidents are Preventable:

The fact that traffi c accidents happen and that the nation experiences the associated trauma shall not be accepted as inevitable. Road accidents don’t just happen; they are caused and thus preventable.

2. Preservation of human life is above everything else:

The priority given to road safety shall refl ect the high value that the nation, as per article 6 of the constitution, places on the preservation of human life and the prevention of serious injury.

3. Total Involvement of the community:

The community at large has an essential role in the development of a positive approach to safe road use.

4. Collaboration:

The multi-disciplinary nature of road safety makes collaboration and partnerships the cornerstone of the road safety strategy. The strategy can only be implemented through interdependent partnerships between government, communities and civil society.

5. Capacity enhancement:

The road safety strategy can only be successful if practitioners have the skills and resources to implement programmes. The road safety strategy supports increased investment in institution building, in education and training of offi cials and communities and investment in resources to sustain the vision.

6. Sustainability:

The road safety strategy has a long-term vision which necessitates the implementation of sustainable programmes, built on realistic funding mechanisms.

7. Socio-economic development:

Road safety programmes will promote development activities in communities, to support the country’s vision of improving the quality of life of its citizens. Civil society will be encouraged to take ownership of road safety problems in the community.

Decade of Action.indd 3Decade of Action.indd 3 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.4

3. STRATEGIC THEMES Generally Strategic Themes are the few priority or focus area in which an organisation has to perform to achieve its vision, based on its mandate. Strategic Themes could be regarded as the main components of the organisation’s strategy. These ‘areas’ are sometimes referred to as goals, high level objectives, clusters of related objectives or key result areas (KRAs). Typically Themes are formed around broad service areas, based on the organisation’s mandate.

The Themes, 6 in number, chosen for Road Safety in Namibia are depicted in the form of a Wheel. This ‘Wheel’ is made up of the 6 main components as shown in Figure 1 below.

Figure 1: Road Safety Strategy Wheel with Strategic Themes

Figure 1 tells us that if Namibia wishes to achieve its road safety vision, it has to perform in these 6 Themes or ‘wheel components.

Decade of Action.indd 4Decade of Action.indd 4 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 5

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

The six Themes are described as follows:

A: ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENTThis is the centre of the ‘wheel’ and represents the functions of the Lead Agency. Being the centre of the wheel, this area’s function is mainly that of holding the wheel together, making sure all other components are working well together as one wheel and that the movement or progress is as required. For progress to be recorded in this area there is need for public confi rmation by the portfolio or line Ministry of the role assigned to the NRSC in this regard and acknowledgement by all stakeholders.

B: EDUCATIONThis theme could be regarded as the fi rst or main component of the ‘wheel’. This is at this point where the wheel starts to roll. In this Theme the general public and specifi c groups, such as drivers, taxis or school children, are educated in road safety and trained in specifi c road safety skills. All types of road users are educated on road safety practices and requirements as recorded in policies, legislation and procedures. The purpose of education is to change mindsets, attitudes and behaviours, to create a deep-rooted culture of road safety.

C: ENFORCEMENTIn this Theme capacity and operations are put in place to enforce compliance to legislation, regulations and standards. This Theme enforces education efforts in a way that road users experience application of what has been learned. Due to penalties and incentives, road users are motivated to change their behaviour towards safer road practices. Enforcement should be applied in a consequent and corruption-free manner.

D. ENGINEERING: VEHICLESThis Theme promotes safe vehicles – in terms of roadworthiness, safe design features and compliance to technical and loading standards.

E: ENGINEERING: ROADSIn this Theme safe roads are provided through good surfaces, forgiving road environments, road signs and markings. It involves the phases from planning, design, construction, rehabilitation to maintenance.

F: EMERGENCY RESPONSEAs Themes B-E attempt to prevent accidents, this Theme responds to those accidents that could not be prevented. It starts with the early notifi cation of accidents, the early treatment at the accident site, to hospital treatment and rehabilitation of accident victims. The purpose is to save lives and assist the injured to be taken up in the communities and the economy as soon as possible.

The following table compares the Themes of this DoA Strategy with the Pillar in the Global Plan and Focal Areas of the Namibia Road Safety Strategy, 2009-2014.

This Namibia DoA Strategy (Themes) Global Plan DoA (Pillars)

Namibia Road Safety Strategy (Functional Programme Area/

Focal Areas)

Theme A: Road Safety Management

Pillar 1: Road safety ManagementArea E: Administration, Research

and Legislation

Theme B: EducationPillar 4: Safer road Users

Area A: Safer People - Improved road user behaviourTheme C: Enforcement

Theme D. Engineering: Vehicles Pillar 3: Safer vehicles Area B: Safer Vehicles

Theme E: Engineering: Roads Pillar 2: Safer roads & mobility Area C: Safer Roads

Theme F: Emergency Response Pillar 5: Post-crash Response Area D: Trauma Response

Decade of Action.indd 5Decade of Action.indd 5 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.6

4. OBJECTIVES & STRATEGY MAP 4.1 Objectives

A total of 18 objectives were identifi ed through the consultation process. The hypothesis is that if the NRSC follows this path, by achieving these 18 objectives in the 6 Themes, it will realise its vision. The 18 selected strategic objectives are listed and described below.

THEME A: ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENTA1. Capacitated Lead Institution with good Synergy

A2. Supportive & harmonised policy and legal frameworks

A3. Integrated MIS & Performance Management

THEME B: EDUCATIONB1. Capacitated Education Institutions with good Synergy

B2. Well Informed & Educated Public & Road Users

B3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D

THEME C: ENFORCEMENTC1. Capacitated Traffi c Law Enforcement Institutions with good Synergy

C2. Appropriate Processes & Technology for Offence Detection, Charging & Prosecution

C3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D

THEME D. ENGINEERING: VEHICLESD1. Capacitated Institutions with good Synergy

D2. Safer & More Road Worthy Vehicles

D3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D

THEME E: ENGINEERING: ROADSE1. Capacitated Institutions with good Synergy

E2. Safer Roads

E3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D

THEME F: EMERGENCY RESPONSEF1. Capacitated Emergency Institutions with good Synergy

F2. Effective & Effi cient Rescue, Treatment & Rehabilitation Operations

F3. Good MIS, Performance Management and R&D

4.2. Strategy Map

The strategy map is a model of value creation through cause-and-effect linkages among the strategic objectives in the various Themes. The identifi ed 6 Themes are ‘populated’ with objectives, the building blocks or value drivers of strategy. Strategy mapping forms an integral part of strategic planning and the BSC. It is sometimes called a ‘value creation map’ or ‘success map’. The strategy map links the various strategic objectives together in a very clear manner for everybody to understand.

Decade of Action.indd 6Decade of Action.indd 6 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 7

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

For the road safety strategy the strategy map is in the form of a wheel, depicting the dynamic nature of wheels rolling on Namibian roads. The strategy map in Figure 2 shows how the six themes make up the wheel and how themes and objectives are dependent on one another, how they support one another to move the wheel towards safer roads for all.

Figure 3 on page 8 overleaf depicts the accountabilities for each of the objectives.

Figure 2: Namibia DoA Strategy Wheel with 6 Themes and 19 Objectives

Decade of Action.indd 7Decade of Action.indd 7 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.8

A. Road SafetyManagement Outputs &

OutcomesOutcomes

1. Socio -Economic –

Environmental Results

Managementg1. Capacitated Lead Institution with good

Synergy

3. Integrated MIS & Performance Mgt

Synergyy gy

3. Supportive & harmonised policy and

legal frameworks

tyt

NRSC/MWT

MWT/RA

MOE/NRSC

MoHSS/MVAF

NamPol/RA/LA

Figure 3: Accountabilities per Objective

Decade of Action.indd 8Decade of Action.indd 8 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 9

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

5. UNDERSTANDING THE SCORECARD5.1 Scorecard Components

The Road Safety Scorecard takes the strategy map and gives it more detail. The Scorecard is therefore the detailed implementation strategy. The Scorecard includes the following:

· The 6 themes

· The 18 objectives with their priorities and accountabilities

· Performance Indicators (PIs) and Targets for each objective

· Initiatives with their priorities and responsibilities

· Cost estimates of all initiatives (expected total cost over the 10 year period)

· Scheduling of these initiatives over the 10 year period (Note that year 1 is 2011)

The Scorecard (for 2011 – 2020) is presented in Annexure A. Note that the objectives refer to the strategy map in Figure 2 and use the same colours.

5.2 Defi ning good Performance Indicators (PIs)

A performance indicator (PI) is a performance metric that will refl ect progress against an objective. The PI and its target should be regarded as part of the objective, making it measurable. A PI is an agreed indicator to be used to determine progress made, or the lack thereof, towards achieving each objective. A PI must be quantifi able to track progress. To develop meaningful PIs, one has to understand desired inputs and the processes that are used to produce outputs and eventually outcomes (IPOO). Leading indicators are predictors of future performance and lagging indicators are outcomes. PIs are used by organisations to measure individual staff member, Unit and overall organisational performance.

Objectives and their PIs need to be SMART: Specifi c, Measurable, Agreed to, Realistic & Time-bound. Each objective should therefore have at least one PI, but preferably not more than three (to prevent complexity). Each PI should have a unit of measurement and a target. PIs could be classifi ed in terms of TCQQ – Time (date/duration/frequency), Cost (N$), Quality (Satisfaction index or %) and/or Quantity (number or %).

5.3 Targets & Benchmarking

A target is a quantifi able standard for each indicator. Performance targets are the expected levels or standards of performance to be reached within specifi c timeframes for each objective. Targets help the organisation to monitor progress towards objectives and communicate expectations for units and the organisation.

Targets have to be challenging and be raised over time, but to remain achievable. Initially targets may be estimated guesses, but over time these targets have to conform to best practices by comparing what are the benchmark targets in the industry. Industry refers to similar types of services offered by others in the region or globally.

Benchmarking is a systematic, deliberate and thorough search for best practices that would lead to performance improvement when adapted in your organisation. The benchmarking process is therefore a systematic learning

Decade of Action.indd 9Decade of Action.indd 9 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.10

process to close the performance gap. It involves planning, data collection, analysis and design, implementation, monitoring and adjustment. It provides PIs and targets as tools to identify ineffi ciencies and to improve business processes. The appropriateness of benchmarks should be reviewed in the performance verifi cation process.

5.4 Initiatives

Objectives (targets for the PIs) are achieved through initiatives or projects. Initiatives are defi ned as current and future activities or projects to help ensure the organisation meets the performance targets, as stated in the PIs and Targets for each Objective. Initiatives drive strategic performance. Initiatives are not ends in themselves, but means by which strategic objectives are achieved.

Initiatives require resources, incl. fi nancial, human and structural. These normally need to be managed by means of project management principles, tools and techniques. It is therefore important to measure initiative progress through project management tools and techniques.

The challenge is to choose the right projects or best projects to achieve the strategic objectives. Initiatives are prioritised, because of limited capacity at any stage. Resources should be applied towards the highest value projects. A well-defi ned process for project selection and prioritisation would be required to maximise the chances of projects contributing to the achievement of these strategic objectives.

The choice of projects normally starts with the listing of all current, approved and proposed projects. This is then followed by the mapping of these projects on a grid – to determine which projects could contribute the most to achieve the chosen strategic objectives. The grid will show gaps as well as duplications of projects per objective. Projects should be chosen to support all objectives in a balanced way – to prevent too many projects per objective as well as no projects per objective. The following process is normally used to prioritise strategic initiatives (projects):

1. Create criteria (for both weighting and scoring) to be used in evaluating strategic initiatives;

2. Create a common format (business case) to review the strategic initiatives for prioritisation;

3. Evaluate and prioritise the strategic initiatives using the stated criteria and business case;

4. Prioritise initiatives with the leadership team.

An example of criteria with their weights is: Strategic importance (40%); Cost (15%); Duration (15%) and Interdependence of initiatives (15%); Risk (15%). Initiatives with the highest scores are then selected and included in the Scorecard.

The methodology followed in the selection of the initiatives in this strategic plan, was to fi rstly choose the major strategic projects and then to prioritise these in terms of importance/ value and urgency. These strategic initiatives per Objective are listed in Annexure A.

Only short descriptions of the initiatives are provided in the Scorecard. Note that a detailed project plan has to be developed for each initiative before implementation.

Note that bold numbers in brackets appearing behind some initiatives, e.g. (E1) refer to the projects in the Namibia Road Safety Strategy, 2009 – 2014.

Decade of Action.indd 10Decade of Action.indd 10 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 11

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

6. COSTING AND BUDGETINGThe initiatives, as described in the Scorecard (Annexure A) require resources – human, physical, structural and fi nancial resources. The total cost estimates are indicated in the scorecards in thousands of N$ (000’s) and are the total costs for the 10 year period – from 2011 to 2020.

To ensure a realistic strategic plan, these resources should be made available. Should resources be lacking, initiatives indicated by Priority 1 should receive preference.

Figure 4 below shows that the total strategic budget for this 10 year period is approximately N$747 million. The average total annual amount required to realise all initiatives in all Themes is approximately N$75 million. The total annual budgets vary from N$90 million in Year 1 to N$70 million in the later years. Themes B, C and F require the majority of all funding.

TOTAL N$ [000s] Theme Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y0112 900 A 14 920 14 331 13 981 9 781 10 281 9 981 9 781 9 781 9 781 10 281 152 800 B 18 850 18 450 18 250 14 850 13 250 13 250 14 850 13 250 13 250 14 550 223 500 C 23 550 23 550 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 22 050 35 800 D 4 600 4 400 4 200 3 200 3 200 3 400 3 200 3 200 3 200 3 200 83 400 E 8 740 8 740 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240 8 240

138 500 F 19 017 19 017 14 017 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350 12 350

746 900 TOTAL 89 677 88 488 80 738 70 471 69 371 69 271 70 471 68 871 68 871 70 671

Figure 4: Total Namibia DoA Strategy Budget

The annual costs above are approximately double that of the annual budgets in the approved NRSS. It should be noted that the above strategic budget includes road safety element in budgets of MWT, MoHSS, MoE, MVAF and other ministries and organisations.

Note that these are just cost estimates and will have to be verifi ed in future. When project plans are developed per initiative/project, these costs will be verifi ed / improved.

Decade of Action.indd 11Decade of Action.indd 11 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.12

The total annual costs of all strategic initiatives in the 6 Themes are illustrated in Figure 5 below.

Figure 5: Annual Strategic Budget requirement per Theme

Decade of Action.indd 12Decade of Action.indd 12 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 13

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

Figures 6 & 7 below clearly show that Themes B, C and F require the majority of funding.

Figure 6: Annual cost distribution of the 6 Themes

Figure 7: Total cost distribution amongst the 6 Themes over the 10 year period

Decade of Action.indd 13Decade of Action.indd 13 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.14

7. CSFS FOR SUCCESSFUL STRATEGY EXECUTION This section highlights the critical success factors (CSFs) for successful strategy execution. The NRSC as Lead Agency for road safety in Namibia is accountable for the execution of this strategy. Without the following critical building blocks in place (see Figure 8), it would be diffi cult to successfully implement this Strategic Plan:

· Vision: A clear purpose and direction, continuously reinforced by strong leadership. Both compelling vision (safer roads) and burning platform (current accidents, injuries and deaths) inspire people to move. With regard to leadership political buy-in is critical together with the need to raise the profi le/status of the Lead Agency.

· Urgency: A need to act now and not delay.

· Capabilities: Suffi cient and capable staff with needed facilities and equipment is needed. Additional staff and skills are required.

· Incentives: To succeed, all SHs should perceive a benefi t or incentive for them to participate and contribute in executing this strategic plan.

· Resources: Suffi cient fi nancial resources are needed to implement all the initiatives.

· Action Plan: Detailed and well communicated action plans/project plans are needed to ensure all SHs know what to do day-by-day. Annual (Operational) Plans should be developed from the scorecards in this strategic plan. Projects/initiatives should only be executed after proper planning. The fi ve project management processes are initiation (in strategic planning), planning, execution, control and close-out. Project management training is recommended to manage the nine knowledge areas of scope, time, cost, quality, HR, communication, risk, procurement and integration management over these 5 processes.

Figure 8: Critical elements of change management

Strategy execution (STRATEX) is a discipline on its own and requires the MERIL-D elements of Measure, Evaluate, Report, Improve, Learn – all around Drive (motivation) and Dialogue, as depicted in Figure 9. This can be regarded as a performance management system. The MERIL-D cycle should be regular, preferably quarterly, but at least bi-annually, to provide a link between the vision (the sun), strategic objectives and projects in the strategic plan. See again the central position of project management.

Decade of Action.indd 14Decade of Action.indd 14 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 15

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

A system is required to help NRSC and its partners to execute the strategy, to track actual performance and to be able to make the right decisions for continuous improvement on is journey towards achieving the strategic objectives and vision. One of the current weaknesses is the lack of proper baselines. These baselines have to be established during the fi rst year of execution.

Figure 9: STRATEX by MERIL-D [Olivier 2010]

Decade of Action.indd 15Decade of Action.indd 15 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.16

Theme Committees:Theme Committees (TC) concept is central to this strategy.

A TC should be elected in each of the 6 themes. Each TC should consist of approximately 8 representatives from the theme industry. The TC’s key functions are planning and performance management of the theme objectives and initiatives/projects. Figure 10 below depicts how the six TCs will meet.

Figure 10: Operation of Theme Committees

Without such a structure and system, NRSC as lead agency would not be able to implement the DoA for road safety strategy. It is envisaged that each meeting would span 2-3 days.

Costs for the functioning of all these TCs are included under Theme A. TCs however should manage the costs of the Theme initiatives.

The lead agency (NRSC) should lead the Theme A Committee, but should also be part of the other 5 TCs.

Decade of Action.indd 16Decade of Action.indd 16 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 17

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

ANNE

XURE

A: NA

MIBIA

DOA S

CORE

CARD

THEM

E A:

ROA

D SA

FETY

MAN

AGEM

ENT

[PIL

LAR

1]

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

1.

Capa

cita

ted

Lead

Ag

ency

Capa

city

ach

ieve

d th

roug

h:-

Hum

an R

esou

rces

- St

ruct

ural

Res

ourc

es

- Ph

ysic

al R

esou

rces

- M

onet

ary

Reso

urce

s

- Re

latio

nal R

esou

rces

2

NRSC

a)

No

of s

taff

in L

ead

Agen

cy

b)

Polit

ical

will

and

fi nan

cial

sup

port

as

mea

sure

d by

% o

f in

itiat

ives

in th

is Pl

an

fund

ed

c)

% o

f inf

rast

ruct

ure

inve

stm

ent u

tilize

d fo

r roa

d sa

fety,

as

mea

sure

d by

N$

spen

t on

this

Plan

/ To

tal N

$ sp

ent o

n ro

ad

infra

stru

ctur

e

[N$1

20 –

150

–170

m

ill ne

eded

in Y

r 1]

BL=

8Y1

= 16

Y2=

25Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

TB

DY1

= 80

%Y2

= 80

%Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

0.1

%Y1

= 10

%Y2

= 10

%Y3

= 10

%Y4

= 10

%Y5

= 10

%Y6

= 10

%Y7

= 10

%Y8

= 10

%Y9

= 10

%Y0

= 10

%

1.

Stru

ctur

al R

efor

m: E

stab

lish

a Le

ad

Road

Saf

ety

Agen

cy w

ith s

ecre

taria

t, ba

sed

on s

uppo

rtive

pol

icy

and

legi

slatio

n (E

1)

1Y

MW

TN

RSC

GTZ

MoJ

J12

000

XX

X

2.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Ref

orm

th

e RF

A; d

evel

op &

impl

emen

t pr

oced

ures

for e

ffect

ive &

effi

cien

t al

loca

tion

of re

sour

ces

to in

itiat

ives/

proj

ects

; im

plem

ent a

n in

nova

tive

fund

ing

mec

hani

sm

2N

MW

TR

FAS

0X

X

3.

Hum

an re

sour

ces:

Dev

elop

a

capa

city

dev

elop

men

t pla

n ba

sed

on

capa

city

nee

ds a

sses

smen

t for

the

Lead

Age

ncy

1N

NR

SCM

WT.

O20

0X

X

4.

Hum

an re

sour

ces:

Bui

ld h

uman

ca

paci

ty a

ccor

ding

to p

lan

– th

roug

h st

affi n

g an

d sk

ills d

evel

opm

ent/

train

ing

1N

NR

SCM

WT

O10

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Est

ablis

h sp

ecia

l acc

iden

t inv

estig

atio

n un

its

(E3.

3)

2N

NR

SCN

Pol

LA GIZ

J0

XX

6.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Dev

elop

ap

prop

riate

sta

ndar

ds a

nd

proc

edur

es, i

ncl.

non

cum

bers

ome

judi

cial

pro

cess

es a

nd p

rom

otio

n of

IS

O 39

001

stan

dard

1Y

NR

SCM

WT

NSI

MoJ

S10

0X

XX

7.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Dev

elop

pro

ject

an

d bu

sines

s pl

ans/

case

s wh

ere

need

ed fo

r im

prov

ed fu

ndin

g

2N

NR

SCM

WT

S10

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

8.

Phys

ical

reso

urce

s: A

cqui

re fa

cilit

ies,

ve

hicl

es, e

quip

men

t and

mat

eria

ls fo

r Le

ad A

genc

y

1N

RA

RFA

S50

0X

X

Decade of Action.indd 17Decade of Action.indd 17 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.18

9.

Mon

etar

y re

sour

ces:

Incr

ease

and

su

stai

n fu

ndin

g to

fund

initi

ative

s of

th

is st

rate

gic

plan

; rec

omm

end

core

an

nual

and

med

ium

ter

m b

udge

tary

ta

rget

s; in

vest

igat

e so

urce

s of

fund

ing

from

fees

, lev

ies,

RFA

, fi n

es, d

onor

s &

spon

sors

hips

(E6)

1N

NR

SCR

AR

FAM

WT

GR

SP

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

10.

Rela

tiona

l res

ourc

es: B

uild

&

mai

ntai

n go

od re

latio

ns, a

llianc

es

and

partn

ersh

ips

(loca

l, re

gion

al a

nd

inte

rnat

iona

l) ; e

stab

lish

coor

dina

tion

mec

hani

sms

with

all

SHs;

est

ablis

h co

ordi

natio

n gr

oups

/ The

me

com

mitt

ees

1Y

NR

SCR

AS

500

XX

X

11.

Rela

tiona

l res

ourc

es: S

uppo

rt an

d pa

rtici

pate

in G

loba

l Roa

d Sa

fety

Ac

tiviti

es (s

ee G

loba

l Pla

n, p

16)

1Y

MW

TR

AJ

3000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

2.

Supp

ortiv

e an

d ha

rmon

ised

po

licy

and

lega

l fra

mew

orks

2

NRSC C

a)

Enab

ling/

supp

ortiv

e an

d ha

rmon

ized

polic

y an

d le

gal f

ram

ewor

ks/

judi

cial

env

ironm

ent –

as

mea

sure

d by

?

BL=

TB

DY1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

Nee

ds a

sses

smen

t: As

sess

nee

d fo

r im

prov

ed p

olic

y an

d le

gal f

ram

ewor

ks

for i

mpr

oved

road

saf

ety

– in

all

Them

es (E

1)

1N

NR

SCM

oJM

WT

400

XX

2.

Polic

y de

velo

pmen

t: De

velo

p /

upda

te a

nd d

issem

inat

e po

licie

s ac

cord

ing

to p

lan

(E1)

1Y

RA

All

J20

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

3.

Legi

slat

ion

deve

lopm

ent:

Deve

lop

/ up

date

and

diss

emin

ate

legi

slatio

n &

regu

latio

ns a

ccor

ding

to p

lan,

incl

. sp

eed

and

alc

ohol

lim

its (E

1)

1Y

MW

TAl

lJ

5000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

Decade of Action.indd 18Decade of Action.indd 18 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 19

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

3.

Inte

grat

ed M

IS

& Pe

rform

ance

M

anag

emen

t

- M

easu

re

- Ev

alua

te

- Re

port

- Im

prov

e

- Le

arn

- Dr

ive &

Dia

logu

e

- U

pdat

e pl

ans

2

NRSC S

a)

INTE

GRAT

ED M

IS o

n ro

ad s

afet

y, lin

ked

with

al

l The

mes

, in

pla

ce,

shar

ed a

nd p

rope

rly

utilis

ed fo

r dec

ision

-m

akin

g

b)

Valu

e of

INTE

GRAT

ED

road

saf

ety

info

rmat

ion

syst

em fo

r dec

ision

m

akin

g

BL=

TB

DY1

= 75

%Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

MIS

nee

ds a

sses

smen

t: Do

in

form

atio

n ne

eds

asse

ssm

ent f

or

deve

lopi

ng a

n in

tegr

ated

Roa

d Sa

fety

M

IS a

t the

Lea

d Ag

ency

; ass

ess

all

data

base

s an

d de

velo

p fu

nctio

nal

requ

irem

ents

for m

gt re

ports

; inc

l. ac

cide

nt M

IS (E

2.1)

(E3)

1N

NR

SCTC

sO

500

X

2.

Inte

grat

ed M

IS: D

evel

op &

mai

ntai

n a

natio

nal i

nteg

rate

d M

IS, l

inki

ng

with

MIS

’s in

oth

er T

hem

es, i

ncl.

data

of a

ccid

ents

, inj

urie

s, d

eath

s,

road

con

ditio

ns, v

ehic

le c

ondi

tions

, em

erge

ncy

resp

onse

, edu

catio

n,

enfo

rcem

ent.

[IPOO

]; Im

prov

e qu

ality

/com

plet

enes

s of

all

data

/ in

form

atio

n (E

2.2,

E3)

1Y

NR

SC

MoH

SSN

Pol

MoJ RA GIZ

O30

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

Them

e M

IS’s:

Sup

port

with

the

esta

blish

men

t of l

ocal

/ Th

eme

syst

ems

to m

easu

re, e

valu

ate

and

repo

rt on

road

saf

ety

[IPOO

]

1Y

NR

SCN

Pol

J10

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

R&D:

Cre

ate

a pl

atfo

rm fo

r the

re

sear

ch, a

nalys

is an

d pu

blic

atio

n of

ro

ad s

afet

y iss

ues;

neg

otia

te w

ith a

nd

supp

ort t

ertia

ry/re

sear

ch in

stitu

tions

fo

r per

iodi

c ro

ad s

afet

y re

sear

ch

(E5)

1Y

NR

SC

UN

AMPo

NN

Col

NPo

lM

WT

J20

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Perfo

rman

ce m

gt: E

stab

lish

and

revie

w PI

s an

d ta

rget

s in

this

stra

tegi

c pl

an, c

onsid

erin

g be

nchm

arks

1Y

RA

NPo

lS

500

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

6.

Them

e Co

mm

ittee

: Est

ablis

h Th

eme

A Co

mm

ittee

on

Road

Saf

ety

and

Mee

t ann

ually

in F

eb fo

r pla

nnin

g &

budg

etin

g; W

orks

hop

in A

ugus

t to

eval

uate

per

form

ance

& to

pre

pare

fo

r ann

ual N

atio

nal C

onfe

renc

e in

Oc

tobe

r

1N

NR

SCD

onor

S15

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

7.

Perfo

rman

ce m

gt: D

o re

gula

r M

ERIL

-D o

n al

l the

mes

, stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ives,

initi

ative

s1

NR

AN

Pol

J20

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 19Decade of Action.indd 19 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.20

8.

Repo

rting

/com

mun

icat

ion:

Impr

ove

the

diss

emin

atio

n/re

porti

ng o

f all

info

rmat

ion

base

d on

com

mun

icat

ion

man

agem

ent p

lan;

regu

larly

repo

rt/pu

blish

sta

tistic

s/fi n

ding

s; s

hare

re

sear

ch a

nd p

erfo

rman

ce fi

ndin

gs;

prom

ote

dial

ogue

to p

rom

ote

lear

ning

; Com

mun

icat

e/Re

port

annu

al ro

ad s

afet

y pe

rform

ance

af

ter a

nnua

l Nat

iona

l Con

fere

nce

in

Octo

ber t

o GR

N &

UN

/WH

O

1Y

NR

SCM

WT

Don

orJ

5000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

9.

Corru

ptio

n: Id

entif

y an

d ad

dres

s co

rrupt

pra

ctic

es th

roug

h pr

oper

sy

stem

; com

mun

icat

e iss

ues

of

corru

ptio

n to

the

publ

ic (E

4)

1Y

NR

SCN

Pol

All

J50

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

10.

Upd

ate

Plan

s: E

nsur

e th

at th

is St

rate

gy a

nd P

roje

ct /

Initi

ative

Pla

ns

are

regu

larly

upd

ated

and

app

rove

d wi

th c

ontri

butio

ns fr

om a

ll Th

emes

2N

NR

SCTC

sJ

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

11.

Revi

ews:

Do

Mid

Ter

m R

evie

w in

20

15 a

nd E

nd T

erm

Rev

iew

in 2

020

2N

MW

TO

1000

XX

Decade of Action.indd 20Decade of Action.indd 20 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 21

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

THEM

E B:

EDU

CATI

ON [P

ILLA

R 4]

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

1.

Capa

cita

ted

Educ

atio

n In

stitu

tions

with

go

od S

yner

gy

Capa

city

ach

ieve

d th

roug

h:-

Hum

an R

esou

rces

- St

ruct

ural

Res

ourc

es

- Ph

ysic

al R

esou

rces

- M

onet

ary

Reso

urce

s

- Re

latio

nal R

esou

rces

Educ

atio

n / t

rain

ing

stak

ehol

ders

incl

.:N

RSC

, MW

T/D

oT, R

A,

MoE

, Sch

ools

, UN

AM,

PoN

, MSS

, LAs

, GR

SP,

NAN

ASO

, NAN

GO

F,

NAB

TA,

MVA

F, M

oHSS

(R

ehab

), N

ABCO

A,

NCC

I, Fi

lling

Sta

tions

, N

amB

rew

Form

al, I

nfor

mal

, Ca

mpa

igns

2

NRSC C

a)

Staf

f cap

acity

– b

ased

on

no

of tr

aine

es

train

ed in

Roa

d Sa

fety

(in

all

inst

itutio

ns)

b)

Secu

red

fund

ing

for

road

saf

ety

educ

atio

n by

NRS

C, R

A [N

$ m

illion

]

c)

% o

f req

uire

d fu

ndin

g ap

prov

ed to

exe

cute

Th

eme

B in

itiat

ives

for

the

year

BL=

TB

DY1

= ?

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

BL=

TB

DY1

= ?

Y2=

?Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

TB

DY1

= ?

Y2=

?Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

All r

esou

rces

: Dev

elop

a c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent p

lan

base

d on

cap

acity

ne

eds

asse

ssm

ent

1Y

NR

SCM

oEM

VAF

J90

0X

XX

2.

Hum

an re

sour

ces:

Tra

in T

rain

ers/

Offi c

ials

in v

ario

us in

stitu

tions

– in

cl.

form

al e

duca

tion

and

shor

t cou

rses

/pr

epar

atio

n of

cam

paig

ns; e

stab

lish

road

saf

ety

orie

ntat

ion

prog

ram

mes

fo

r all

offi c

ials

invo

lved

in ro

ad s

afet

y an

d bu

ild th

e ca

paci

ty o

f tra

ffi c

polic

e of

fi cer

s (A

6)

1Y

NR

SCN

Pol

RA

MVA

FG

IZ

J15

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

Hum

an re

sour

ces:

Var

ious

in

stitu

tions

pro

vide

train

ing,

incl

. tra

inin

g of

com

mun

ities

in e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se a

nd fi

rst a

id

1Y

NR

SCAl

lSH

sJ

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

Phys

ical

reso

urce

s: E

stab

lish

a ro

ad

safe

ty p

ark

(inst

itutio

n) fo

r tra

inin

g th

e pu

blic

on

road

saf

ety

2Y

NR

SCM

WT

MoE

MLG

J12

000

XX

X

5.

Phys

ical

reso

urce

s: A

cqui

re a

mob

ile

unit

for t

he R

oad

Safe

ty P

ark

2Y

NR

SCM

WT

MoE

MLG

J20

00X

X

6.

Phys

ical

reso

urce

s: D

evel

op,

repr

oduc

e an

d di

strib

ute

train

ing

mat

eria

ls on

road

saf

ety,

incl

. to

be

used

for T

oT

1N

RSC

MoE

J40

00X

XX

X

7.

Rela

tiona

l res

ourc

es: B

uild

&

mai

ntai

n go

od re

latio

ns, a

llianc

es

and

partn

ersh

ips

(loca

l, re

gion

al

and

inte

rnat

iona

l) –

to p

rom

ote

‘one

m

essa

ge’,

coor

dina

ted

educ

atio

n an

d tra

inin

g in

var

ious

sec

tors

1Y

NR

SCM

WT

LA RC

NAN

GN

ANA

J50

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 21Decade of Action.indd 21 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.22

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

2.

Wel

l Inf

orm

ed &

Ed

ucat

ed P

ublic

&

Road

Use

rs

1

NRSC C

a)

Road

saf

ety

know

ledg

e by

pub

lic

and

non-

mot

orise

d tra

nspo

rt us

ers

– as

m

easu

red

by?

b)

Know

ledg

e an

d sk

ills o

f driv

ers

and

pass

enge

rs –

as

mea

sure

d by

?

c)

Cultu

re o

f roa

d sa

fety

as

mea

sure

s by

vo

lunt

ary

com

plia

nce?

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

Trai

ning

mat

eria

ls: D

o tra

inin

g ne

eds

asse

ssm

ent a

nd d

evelo

p ed

ucat

ion

and

train

ing

plan

/ pr

ogra

mm

e wi

th

mat

erial

s (in

cl. re

gular

revie

w of

ef

fect

ivene

ss)

1Y

NR

SCM

oFM

VAF

NAN

GN

ANA

J12

00X

XX

X

2.

Educ

atio

n th

e pu

blic

acc

ordi

ng to

Pl

an: I

mpl

emen

t the

LT C

omm

unica

tion

Plan

–in

cl. a

ll typ

es o

f edu

catio

n an

d ca

mpa

igns;

incl.

dea

ling

with

ex

haus

tion

/ tire

dnes

s, sto

ppag

es a

long

the

road

, han

dlin

g of

car

bre

akag

es ,

the

Poor

trip

plan

ning

& p

repa

ratio

ns,

hand

ling

of va

rious

illne

sses

and

di

sabi

lities

, ta

xi dr

iving

skills

, drin

king

and

drug

s, ag

gres

sive

beha

viour

, red

lig

ht o

ffenc

es, s

afet

y belt

s, sp

eedi

ng,

impa

ired

/ dist

ract

ed d

rivin

g, in

cl. u

se

of c

ell p

hone

s, vu

lner

able

road

use

rs,

non-

mot

orise

d tra

nspo

rt us

ers,

incl.

the

use

of h

elmet

s (A4

)

1Y

NR

SCN

BC

MVA

FM

oJG

IZM

HS

MIC

T M

oE LAN

ANG

NAN

A

J35

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

Colla

bora

te w

ith c

omm

uniti

es to

im

plem

ent r

oad

safe

ty at

com

mun

ity

level

thro

ugh

netw

ork

of c

omm

unity

fo

rum

s thr

ough

LA/

RC st

ruct

ures

(A

2.2,

A5)

1Y

NR

SCR

C LAN

ANG

NAN

AM

LGN

Pol

J10

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

4.

Scho

ol e

duca

tion:

Inte

grat

e ro

ad sa

fety

into

the

scho

ol cu

rricu

lum

, im

plem

ent

Juni

or T

raffi

c Tr

ainin

g Ce

ntre

s &

Scho

lar P

atro

ls (A

1)

1Y

NR

SCM

oEH

PSI

LAN

ANA

J20

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Impl

emen

t Saf

e Ro

utes

to S

choo

l pr

ogra

mm

e (A

2)1

YN

RSC

RA LA Com

MoE

J50

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

6.

Road

safe

ty a

t wor

k: P

rovid

e ro

ad

safe

ty tra

inin

g in

the

work

env

ironm

ent;

Safe

ty/OH

S law

s, sta

ndar

ds &

rules

for

safe

ope

ratio

n of

com

mer

cial f

reigh

t an

d tra

nspo

rt ve

hicle

s, pa

ssen

ger

road

tran

spor

t veh

icles

and

priv

ate

fl eet

s to

redu

ce c

rash

inju

ries;

prov

ide

guid

eline

s and

wor

ksho

ps (A

3)

1Y

NR

SCM

LSW

MVA

FM

oEG

RSP

Priv

O50

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 22Decade of Action.indd 22 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 23

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

7.

Driv

er in

stru

ctio

n an

d te

stin

g:

Cont

rol d

river

inst

ruct

ion

and

test

ing;

re

gula

te d

rivin

g sc

hool

s th

roug

h ac

cred

itatio

n sy

stem

; rev

ise te

stin

g sy

stem

& m

ater

ials;

est

ablis

h dr

iver

test

ing

insp

ecto

rate

(A7)

1Y

NR

SCR

AN

DI

MW

TN

Pol

LA RFA

MoJ

GIZ

J20

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

8.

Publ

ic tr

ansp

ort:

Impr

ove

the

safe

ty

of p

ublic

tran

spor

t thr

ough

tran

spor

t pe

rmit

data

base

and

con

trol,

drive

r tra

inin

g, a

ccre

dita

tion

& aw

ards

, pu

blic

tran

spor

t saf

ety

plan

s, s

afet

y m

gt s

yste

ms

& ro

adwo

rthin

ess

(A8)

1Y

MW

TR

AN

RSC

NAB

TLA Pr

iv

J20

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

3.

Good

MIS

, Pe

rform

ance

M

anag

emen

t and

R&

D in

Edu

catio

n

- M

easu

re

- Ev

alua

te

- Re

port

- Im

prov

e

- Le

arn

- Dr

ive &

Dia

logu

e

- U

pdat

e pl

ans

2

NRSC, MWT, NRSCC

a)

MIS

on

road

saf

ety

educ

atio

n in

pla

ce,

shar

ed a

nd p

rope

rly

utilis

ed fo

r dec

ision

-m

akin

g

b)

Valu

e of

road

saf

ety

educ

atio

n in

form

atio

n fo

r dec

ision

mak

ing

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

R&D:

Res

earc

h, d

evel

op a

nd

prom

ote

com

preh

ensiv

e po

licie

s an

d pr

actic

es to

redu

ce w

ork-

rela

ted

road

traf

fi c in

jurie

s in

all

sect

ors,

in

supp

ort o

f int

erna

tiona

lly re

cogn

ised

stan

dard

s fo

r roa

d sa

fety

mgt

sy

stem

s an

d OH

S

2N

MoE

NR

SCJ

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

2.

Grad

uate

Driv

er L

icen

sing

Sys

tem

: In

vest

igat

e th

e es

tabl

ishm

ent o

f Gr

adua

te D

river

Lic

ensin

g Sy

stem

s fo

r nov

ice

drive

rs

2N

MoE

NR

SCJ

200

X

3.

MIS

: Im

prov

e an

d co

ordi

nate

da

taba

ses

and

MIS

for R

S ed

ucat

ion

2N

MoE

NR

SCJ

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

4.

Them

e Co

mm

ittee

& P

erf M

gt:

Esta

blish

The

me

B Co

mm

ittee

on

Road

Saf

ety

and

Mee

t ann

ually

in

Feb

for p

lann

ing

& bu

dget

ing;

W

orks

hop

in A

ugus

t to

eval

uate

pe

rform

ance

& to

pre

pare

for a

nnua

l N

atio

nal C

onfe

renc

e in

Oct

ober

2N

NR

SCD

onor

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Perfo

rman

ce m

gt: S

hare

rese

arch

an

d pe

rform

ance

fi nd

ings

; pro

mot

e di

alog

ue to

pro

mot

e le

arni

ng2

NM

oEN

RSC

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

6.

Upd

ate

Plan

s: S

trate

gy a

nd P

roje

ct /

Initi

ative

Pla

ns2

NM

oEN

RSC

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

Decade of Action.indd 23Decade of Action.indd 23 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.24

THEM

E C:

ENF

ORCE

MEN

T [P

ILLA

R 4]

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

1.

Capa

cita

ted

Traf

fi c

Law

Enfo

rcem

ent

Inst

itutio

ns w

ith

good

Syn

ergy

Capa

city

ach

ieve

d th

roug

h:-

Hum

an R

esou

rces

- St

ruct

ural

Res

ourc

es

- Ph

ysic

al R

esou

rces

, e.

g. te

chno

logy

- M

onet

ary

Reso

urce

s

- Re

latio

nal R

esou

rces

STAK

EHO

LDER

S:N

amPo

l, Co

W C

ity

Polic

e, L

A tra

ffi c

dept

s., R

A, M

oJ w

ith

mag

istra

tes,

MW

T

2

NamPol P

a)

No

of tr

aine

d an

d eq

uipp

ed ro

ad tr

affi c

en

forc

emen

t offi

cers

(o

r per

10,

000

vehi

cle

popu

latio

n)

b)

% o

f req

uire

d fu

ndin

g ap

prov

ed to

exe

cute

Th

eme

C in

itiat

ives

for

the

year

c)

No

of d

edic

ated

traf

fi c

cour

ts c

apac

itate

d an

d in

ope

ratio

n

BL=

500

Y1=

525

Y2=

550

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

1500

?Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

= 25

00

BL=

NA

Y1=

80%

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

BL=

0Y1

= 3

Y2=

6Y3

= 9

Y4=

12Y5

= 14

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

28

1.

All r

esou

rces

: Dev

elop

a c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent p

lan

base

d on

cap

acity

ne

eds

asse

ssm

ent i

n En

forc

emen

t ‘In

dust

ry’

1N

MW

TAl

lJ

4000

XX

2.

HR:

Acq

uire

/App

oint

mor

e st

aff –

in

all n

eede

d en

forc

emen

t pos

ition

s (in

cl in

cou

rts) –

acc

ordi

ng to

pla

n (c

ontri

bute

20%

)

1Y

MW

TJ

7500

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

HR:

Bui

ld h

uman

cap

acity

acc

ordi

ng

to p

lan

– th

roug

h sk

ills d

evel

opm

ent /

tra

inin

g –

in a

ll en

forc

emen

t asp

ects

1Y

MW

TJ

2000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Impr

ove

the

stru

ctur

e an

d co

ordi

natio

n pr

oced

ures

am

ongs

t Enf

orce

men

t Ag

ents

(A11

.1)

1Y

MW

TJ

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Impr

ove

supp

ortin

g po

licie

s an

d le

gisla

tion

for

effe

ctive

and

effi

cien

t enf

orce

men

t; re

view

and

upda

te le

gisla

tion

and

pena

lties

– in

cl. s

peed

lim

its, c

hild

se

ats,

repe

at o

ffend

ers,

(tee

nage

) al

coho

l drin

king

(A11

.3-5

); de

crim

inal

ise c

erta

in o

ffenc

es a

nd

impl

emen

t adm

in a

djud

icat

ion

syst

em; c

onsid

er p

oint

s de

mer

it sy

stem

(A9.

3); c

onsid

er c

ompu

lsory

tra

inin

g an

d co

mm

unity

ser

vice

for

repe

at o

ffend

ers

(A9.

4), i

ncen

tives

fo

r ear

ly pa

ymen

t

1Y

MoJ

NR

SCN

Pol

MW

TG

IZ

J50

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

6.

Phys

ical

reso

urce

s: A

cqui

re/B

uild

fa

cilit

ies

need

ed fo

r im

prov

ed

enfo

rcem

ent,

incl

. roa

d bl

ocks

and

tra

ffi c

cour

ts (A

9.2)

1Y

MW

TJ

6500

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

7.

Phys

ical

reso

urce

s: A

cqui

re v

ehic

les,

eq

uipm

ent a

nd m

ater

ials

need

ed fo

r im

prov

ed e

nfor

cem

ent (

10%

fund

ing

cont

ribut

ion)

1Y

MW

TJ

3000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

8.

Rela

tiona

l res

ourc

es: B

uild

rela

tions

, al

lianc

es a

nd p

artn

ersh

ips

with

lo

cal,

regi

onal

and

inte

rnat

iona

l en

forc

emen

t ins

titut

ions

2N

MW

TJ

5000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

Decade of Action.indd 24Decade of Action.indd 24 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 25

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

2.

Appr

opria

te

Proc

esse

s &

Tech

nolo

gy fo

r Of

fenc

e De

tect

ion,

Ch

argi

ng &

Pr

osec

utio

n

1

NamPol, NamPol P

a)

Tota

l num

ber o

f tra

ffi c

viola

tions

in a

ll ca

tego

ries

per a

nnum

b)

% S

ucce

ssfu

l pr

osec

utio

n (p

aym

ent

and

cour

t cas

es) –

for

all c

ateg

orie

s of

traf

fi c

offe

nces

BL=

17

0000

Y1=

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

7000

0

BL=

20%

Y1=

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

80%

1.

Enfo

rcem

ent o

pera

tions

: Im

plem

ent

inte

nsive

, har

mon

ised,

sta

ndar

d an

d ef

fect

ive tr

affi c

ope

ratio

ns/

proc

edur

es; I

mpl

emen

t tra

ffi c

enfo

rcem

ent t

hrou

gh v

ario

us

agen

cies

; Im

prov

e ev

iden

ce

and

proc

esse

s to

redu

ce c

ourt

with

draw

als

(A10

.1-4

)

2Y

NPo

lN

RSC

MW

TLA

J20

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

2.

Tech

nolo

gy: I

ncre

ase

use

of

appr

opria

te te

chno

logy

for o

ffenc

e de

tect

ion

(A10

.5)

1Y

NPo

lN

RSC

MW

TLA

J40

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

Visi

bilit

y: Im

prov

e vis

ibilit

y an

d in

spec

tions

by

enfo

rcem

ent o

ffi ce

rs –

ac

cord

ing

to a

ctio

n pl

an1

YN

Pol

All

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

4.

Invo

lve

com

mun

ities

thr

ough

CO

PPS

appr

oach

; m

onth

ly co

mm

unity

mee

tings

per

Zon

e;

Safe

ty C

omm

ittee

s; tr

aini

ng a

nd

feed

back

; nei

ghbo

urho

od w

atch

es –

1N

Pol

LAs

Priv

Com

NG

Os

J10

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Ease

of p

aym

ent:

Impr

ove/

simpl

ify

paym

ents

and

pay

poi

nts

by a

gent

s,

e.g.

Pos

t Offi

ces;

pay

men

t lin

ked

to M

IS/p

aym

ent c

odes

– e

stab

lish,

op

erat

e an

d m

aint

ain

1N

Pol

LAAg

ent

J10

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 25Decade of Action.indd 25 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.26

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

3.

Good

MIS

, Pe

rform

ance

M

anag

emen

t and

R&

D

- M

easu

re

- Ev

alua

te

- Re

port

- Im

prov

e

- Le

arn

- Dr

ive &

Dia

logu

e

- U

pdat

e pl

ans

2

NamPol, NamPol

a)

MIS

in p

lace

, sha

red

and

prop

erly

utilis

ed

for d

ecisi

on-m

akin

g –

all s

yste

ms

inte

grat

ed

into

one

Tra

fman

Sy

stem

, inc

l.

Nam

CIS

(cou

rt sy

stem

), TC

S, N

RSC

Syst

em (R

SIM

S),

E-po

licin

g Sy

stem

lin

ked

to N

aTIS

/ e-

NaT

IS

b)

Valu

e of

enf

orce

men

t in

form

atio

n fo

r de

cisio

n m

akin

g

BL=

NA

Dat

e =

Dec

201

2

BL=

NA

Y1=

70%

Y2=

80%

Y3=

90%

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

1.

Deve

lop

MIS

: Set

up

MIS

(Tra

fman

) an

d in

tegr

ate

with

oth

er s

yste

ms

(A9.

1)1

YN

Pol

MW

TJ

5000

XX

2.

Oper

ate

and

mai

ntai

n th

e M

IS:

(Tra

fman

), in

cl. t

rain

ing

of u

sers

and

lic

ense

fees

(80,

000

pa) (

A9.1

)1

YN

Pol

MW

TJ

8000

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

Perfo

rman

ce M

gt: M

easu

re,

Eval

uate

and

Rep

ort r

egul

arly

on a

ll en

forc

emen

t asp

ects

(M/Q

/A)

1Y

NPo

lM

WT

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

4.

R&D:

Do/

prom

ote

R&D

for

cont

inuo

us im

prov

emen

t of

enfo

rcem

ent

2N

TCN

RSC

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Web

site

and

/or n

ewsl

ette

rs:

Esta

blish

, ope

rate

and

mai

ntai

n a

publ

ic in

form

atio

n sh

arin

g pl

atfo

rm

such

as

a we

bsite

and

/or n

ewsle

tters

to

sha

re p

ertin

ent i

nfor

mat

ion

with

of

fi cia

ls an

d th

e pu

blic

(A11

.2)

2N

NR

SCAl

lJ

2000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

6.

Them

e Co

mm

ittee

& P

erfo

rman

ce

Mgt

: Est

ablis

h Th

eme

B Co

mm

ittee

on

Roa

d Sa

fety

and

Mee

t ann

ually

in

Feb

for p

lann

ing

& bu

dget

ing;

W

orks

hop

in A

ugus

t to

eval

uate

pe

rform

ance

& to

pre

pare

for a

nnua

l N

atio

nal C

onfe

renc

e in

Oct

ober

2N

NR

SCD

onor

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

7.

Perfo

rman

ce M

gt: S

hare

rese

arch

an

d pe

rform

ance

fi nd

ings

; pro

mot

e di

alog

ue to

pro

mot

e le

arni

ng2

NTC

NR

SCJ

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

8.

Upd

ate

Plan

s: S

trate

gy a

nd P

roje

ct /

Initi

ative

Pla

ns2

NTC

NR

SCJ

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 26Decade of Action.indd 26 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 27

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

THEM

E D:

ENG

INEE

RING

: VEH

ICLE

S [P

ILLA

R 3]

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

1.

Capa

cita

ted

Inst

itutio

ns w

ith

good

Syn

ergy

Capa

city

ach

ieve

d th

roug

h:-

Hum

an R

esou

rces

- St

ruct

ural

Res

ourc

es

- Ph

ysic

al R

esou

rces

- M

onet

ary

Reso

urce

s

- Re

latio

nal R

esou

rces

2

MWT / RA

a)

Staf

f cap

acity

– b

ased

on

requ

ired

reso

urce

s

b)

% o

f req

uire

d fu

ndin

g ap

prov

ed to

exe

cute

Th

eme

D in

itiat

ives

for

the

year

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

All r

esou

rces

: Dev

elop

a c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent p

lan

for t

he N

amib

ian

vehi

cle

safe

ty in

dust

ry, b

ased

on

capa

city

nee

ds a

sses

smen

t

1N

NR

SCAl

lJ

400

XX

2.

HR:

Impr

ove

staf

fi ng

and

deve

lop

skills

/ tra

in, i

ncl.

train

ing

of v

ehic

le

exam

iner

s of

veh

icle

test

ing

cent

res

and

insp

ecto

rate

and

sta

ff at

NSI

, the

re

gula

tor (

B2.1

);

1Y

NR

SCAl

lJ

5000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Dev

elop

ap

prop

riate

legi

slatio

n, p

olic

ies

and

proc

edur

es, e

.g. l

egisl

ate

min

imum

st

anda

rds

for t

he tr

ansp

ort o

f sc

hola

rs, c

ontra

ctor

s, fa

rm w

orke

rs

and

othe

r vul

nera

ble

grou

ps (B

4);

enac

t law

s th

at p

rohi

bit t

he u

se o

f ve

hicl

es w

ithou

t sea

t bel

ts –

fron

t and

re

ar

1N

NR

SCM

oJN

Pol

J40

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Dev

elop

and

im

plem

ent a

com

preh

ensiv

e ov

erlo

ad

cont

rol s

trate

gy, c

onsid

erin

g cr

oss-

bord

er is

sues

(B5.

1)

2N

RA

MW

TN

Pol

J0?

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Est

ablis

h a

Vehi

cle

Test

ing

Insp

ecto

rate

, bas

ed

on in

stitu

tiona

l req

uire

men

ts, t

o de

velo

p an

d m

aint

ain

min

imum

st

anda

rds

for v

ehic

le te

stin

g ce

ntre

s (B

2) –

refe

r to

NRC

S in

Sou

th A

frica

2Y

NaT

IS

RA

NPo

lLA

sN

RSC

MW

T

J30

00X

XX

6.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Intro

duce

co

ntro

l mea

sure

s ba

sed

on n

ew

tech

nolo

gy (B

6)2

NM

WT

J0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

7.

Phys

ical

reso

urce

s: E

nsur

e th

at re

quire

d fa

cilit

ies,

veh

icle

s,

equi

pmen

t and

mat

eria

ls ar

e ac

quire

d –

acco

rdin

g to

pla

n, in

cl.

NSI

test

ing

faci

litie

s

2N

MW

TAl

l SH

sJ

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

8.

Rela

tiona

l res

ourc

es: B

uild

goo

d re

latio

ns, a

llianc

es &

par

tner

ship

s (lo

cal,

regi

onal

& in

tl); p

artic

ipat

e in

the

UN

Wor

ld F

orum

for

Har

mon

izatio

n of

Veh

icle

Reg

ulat

ions

&

appl

y re

leva

nt s

tand

ards

; pa

rtici

pate

in N

CAP

proj

ects

1N

NR

SCM

WT

J20

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 27Decade of Action.indd 27 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.28

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

2.

Safe

r & M

ore

Road

W

orth

y Ve

hicl

es o

n ou

r Roa

ds

- De

sign;

Ope

ratio

n;

Mai

nten

ance

- Pu

blic

& P

rivat

e ve

hicl

es

1

MWT / RA

a)

Vehi

cle

safe

ty

as m

easu

red

by

com

plia

nce

to d

esig

n &

cons

truct

ion

stan

dard

s (in

cl. s

afet

y be

lts, a

ir ba

gs, e

tc.)

b)

Com

plia

nce

to

road

wor

thin

ess

requ

irem

ents

c)

Com

plia

nce

of p

ublic

ve

hicl

e ut

ilisat

ion

in te

rms

of lo

ads

[pas

seng

ers

and

axle

lo

ad]

d)

Impr

oved

saf

ety

of n

on-m

otor

ised

trans

port

/ vul

nera

ble

road

use

rs –

as

mea

sure

d by

?

BL=

%Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

%Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

%Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

%Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

Mot

or v

ehic

le in

spec

tion

syst

em:

Inve

stig

ate

& de

velo

p a

perio

dic

mot

or

vehi

cle

insp

ectio

n sy

stem

(B3)

– fo

r al

l typ

es o

f veh

icle

s at

all

loca

tions

-–

base

d on

NSI

sta

ndar

ds

1N

NR

SC

NSI

NPo

lLA

NaT

IS

400

XX

2.

Road

veh

icle

insp

ectio

ns: I

nten

sify

on

-the-

road

veh

icle

insp

ectio

ns/c

ontro

l - a

t roa

dblo

ck a

nd c

heck

poin

ts, i

ncl.

road

wor

thin

ess

& pu

blic

pas

seng

er

trans

port

perm

its (B

1; B

3)

1N

NPo

l

NaT

ISLA R

AM

WT

6000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

Good

tran

spor

t: Im

prov

e im

plem

enta

tion

of a

ll go

ods

trans

port

requ

irem

ents

(inc

l. tra

nspo

rt of

ha

zard

ous

mat

eria

ls) (B

5.2)

1N

NPo

lLA R

AN

RSC

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

Spec

ifi c

vehi

cle

safe

ty is

sues

: Dea

l wi

th s

peci

fi c v

ehic

le s

afet

y iss

ues,

in

cl. d

ark

/ tin

ted

wind

ows,

use

of c

ell

phon

es, p

oor t

yre

and

over

load

ing

– ba

sed

on N

SI s

tand

ards

1N

RA

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Vehi

cle

safe

ty te

chno

logi

es:

Inve

stig

ate

& en

cour

age

depl

oym

ent o

f im

prov

ed v

ehic

le s

afet

y te

chno

logi

es

appr

opria

te fo

r Nam

ibia

, inc

l. sp

eed

limite

rs, c

rash

pre

vent

ion

devic

es,

elec

troni

c st

abilit

y co

ntro

l, an

ti-lo

ck

brak

ing

syst

ems,

rada

r and

cra

sh

miti

gatio

n de

vices

(B6)

2N

RA

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

6.

Deve

lop

& Im

plem

ent S

afe

Flee

t Po

licy:

Enco

urag

e pu

blic

tran

spor

t an

d fl e

et m

anag

ers

in p

rivat

e an

d pu

blic

sec

tor t

o pu

rcha

se, o

pera

te &

m

aint

ain

vehi

cles

that

offe

r adv

ance

d te

chno

logi

es a

nd h

igh

leve

ls of

oc

cupa

nt p

rote

ctio

n (B

6.1)

2N

NR

SC

MW

TN

Pol

LAs

NaT

IS

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

7.

New

& im

porte

d ve

hicl

e st

anda

rds:

Enco

urag

e ag

reem

ent t

o en

sure

all

new

& im

porte

d ve

hicl

es a

re e

quip

ped

with

sea

t bel

ts, p

assin

g cr

ash

test

s, e

tc.

(as

min

imum

sta

ndar

ds);

Enco

urag

e in

cent

ives/

pena

lties

towa

rds

vehi

cles

wi

th h

ighe

r saf

ety

stan

dard

s –

base

d on

NSI

sta

ndar

ds

2N

Cust

omN

SI10

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

8.

Pede

stria

n pr

otec

tion:

Enc

oura

ge

appl

icat

ion

of p

edes

trian

pro

tect

ion

regu

latio

ns

1N

MW

TN

RSC

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 28Decade of Action.indd 28 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 29

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

3.

Good

MIS

, Pe

rform

ance

M

anag

emen

t and

R&

D

- M

easu

re

- Ev

alua

te

- Re

port

- Im

prov

e

- Le

arn

- Dr

ive &

Dia

logu

e

- U

pdat

e pl

ans

2

MWT / RA, MWT / RA

a)

MIS

in p

lace

, sha

red

an

d pr

oper

ly ut

ilised

fo

r dec

ision

-mak

ing

b)

Valu

e of

Veh

icle

in

form

atio

n fo

r de

cisio

n m

akin

g

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

MIS

: Exp

and/

Impr

ove

NaT

IS/T

rafm

an

Syst

em o

n ve

hicl

es a

nd v

ehic

le

safe

ty??

1N

NaT

IS10

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

2.

Them

e Co

mm

ittee

& P

erfo

rman

ce

Mgt

: Est

ablis

h Th

eme

D Co

mm

ittee

on

Roa

d Sa

fety

and

Mee

t ann

ually

in

Feb

for p

lann

ing

& bu

dget

ing;

W

orks

hop

in A

ugus

t to

eval

uate

pe

rform

ance

& to

pre

pare

for a

nnua

l N

atio

nal C

onfe

renc

e in

Oct

ober

1N

TCN

RSC

Don

or0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

R&D:

Incr

ease

rese

arch

in s

afet

y te

chno

logi

es d

esig

ned

to re

duce

risk

s to

vul

nera

ble

road

use

rs2

NN

RSC

Don

or0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

4.

R&D:

Inve

stig

ate/

rese

arch

impr

oved

ve

hicl

e sa

fety

tech

nolo

gies

and

liai

se

with

inte

rnat

iona

l R&D

Inst

itutio

ns

(B6)

2N

NR

SCD

onor

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

5.

UN

Saf

ety

Regu

latio

ns: I

nves

tigat

e,

appl

y an

d pr

omul

gate

mot

or v

ehic

le

safe

ty re

gula

tions

as

deve

lope

d by

the

UN

Wor

ld F

orum

for

H

arm

oniza

tion

of V

ehic

le R

egul

atio

ns

(WP

29)

2N

NR

SC0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

6.

New

car

ass

essm

ent p

rogr

amm

e:

Inve

stig

ate

& de

velo

p &

Impl

emen

t a

new

car a

sses

smen

t pro

gram

me

2N

NSI

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

7 Pe

rform

ance

Mgt

: Sha

re re

sear

ch

and

perfo

rman

ce fi

ndin

gs; p

rom

ote

dial

ogue

to p

rom

ote

lear

ning

2N

TC0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

8.

Upd

ate

Plan

s: S

trate

gy a

nd P

roje

ct /

Initi

ative

Pla

ns2

NTC

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 29Decade of Action.indd 29 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.30

THEM

E E:

ENG

INEE

RING

: ROA

DS [P

ILLA

R 2]

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

1.

Capa

cita

ted

Inst

itutio

ns w

ith

good

Syn

ergy

Capa

city

ach

ieve

d th

roug

h:-

Hum

an R

esou

rces

- St

ruct

ural

Res

ourc

es

- Ph

ysic

al R

esou

rces

- M

onet

ary

Reso

urce

s

- Re

latio

nal R

esou

rces

STAK

EHO

LDER

S IN

CL.

RA,

MW

T, L

As,

Cons

ulta

nts,

Con

tract

ors

2

MWT / RA

a)

Staf

f cap

acity

– b

ased

on

% c

ompe

tent

st

aff i

n al

l req

uire

d po

sitio

ns

b)

% o

f req

uire

d fu

ndin

g ap

prov

ed to

exe

cute

Th

eme

E in

itiat

ives

for

the

year

BL=

TB

DY1

= 80

% ?

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

All r

esou

rces

: Dev

elop

a c

apac

ity

deve

lopm

ent p

lan

base

d on

cap

acity

ne

eds

asse

ssm

ent

1N

NR

SCAl

lSH

s40

0X

X

2.

Hum

an re

sour

ces:

Bui

ld h

uman

ca

paci

ty a

ccor

ding

to p

lan

– th

roug

h st

affi n

g &

skills

dev

elop

men

t; in

cl.

road

saf

ety

train

ing

& ed

ucat

ion

in

low

cost

saf

ety

engi

neer

ing,

saf

ety

audi

t tra

inin

g of

eng

inee

rs (C

1.1)

, tra

inin

g of

com

mun

ity c

ontra

ctor

s (C

4.2)

1Y

NR

SCAl

lSH

s10

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

3.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Bui

ld s

truct

ural

ca

paci

ty b

y m

eans

of a

ppro

pria

te

legi

slatio

n, p

olic

ies

and

proc

edur

es,

e.g.

legi

slate

on

audi

ts o

n ne

w an

d ex

istin

g ro

ads

(C1.

2)

1N

NR

SCM

WT

MoJ

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

Stru

ctur

al re

sour

ces:

Bui

ld s

truct

ural

ca

paci

ty b

y es

tabl

ishin

g a

spec

ialis

t ro

ad s

afet

y an

d tra

ffi c

unit

to m

onito

r an

d im

prov

e th

e sa

fety

of t

he ro

ad

netw

ork

2N

NR

SCM

WT

RA

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

5.

Phys

ical

reso

urce

s: A

cqui

re fa

cilit

ies,

ve

hicl

es, e

quip

men

t and

mat

eria

ls as

re

quire

d, a

ccor

ding

to P

lan

2N

NR

SC10

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

6.

Rela

tiona

l res

ourc

es: B

uild

&

mai

ntai

n go

od re

latio

ns, a

llianc

es

and

partn

ersh

ips

(loca

l, re

gion

al a

nd

inte

rnat

iona

l) –

with

dev

elop

men

t ba

nks,

GRN

, LAs

, NGO

s, C

BOs,

Pr

ivate

Sec

tor –

to e

nsur

e sa

fe in

fra

desig

n pr

inci

ples

; pro

mot

e ro

ad

safe

ty o

wner

ship

and

acc

ount

abilit

y am

ongs

t ind

ustry

SH

s; m

ake

RA

lega

lly re

spon

sible

for i

mpr

ovin

g ro

ad

safe

ty, re

porti

ng a

nnua

lly o

n sa

fety

sit

uatio

n

1N

NR

SCAl

lSH

s0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

Decade of Action.indd 30Decade of Action.indd 30 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 31

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

2.

Safe

r Roa

ds

Defi

ned

as:

- Go

od la

nd u

se

plan

ning

and

des

ign

- Go

od ro

ad s

urfa

ces

(con

stru

cted

, re

habi

litat

ed &

m

aint

aine

d)

- Cl

ear r

oad

mar

king

s an

d sig

ns

- Sa

fe ro

ad

envir

onm

ents

1

RA / MWT

a)

Supp

ortiv

e La

nd U

se

Plan

ning

, Urb

an &

Ro

ad D

esig

n; E

xten

t th

at tr

ansp

ort s

afet

y is

inte

grat

ed in

road

pl

anni

ng; m

obilit

y an

d ac

cess

ibilit

y

b)

% o

f sur

face

d an

d un

-sur

face

d ro

ads

in

unac

cept

able

pos

ition

c)

Num

ber o

f bla

ck

spot

s (h

igh

risk

road

se

ctio

ns) i

n N

amib

ia

(con

sider

ing

road

s,

obst

ruct

ions

, ani

mal

s,

etc.

)

d)

% o

f roa

d pr

ojec

ts

fund

ed o

n tim

e ac

cord

ing

to B

usin

ess

Plan

s

BL=

?Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

= 0

BL=

?Y1

= 12

%Y2

= 11

%Y3

= 10

%Y4

= 9%

Y5=

8%Y6

= 7.

5%Y7

= 7%

Y8=

6.5%

Y9=

6%Y0

= 5.

5%

BL=

?Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

= 0

BL=

?Y1

= 10

0%Y2

= 10

0%Y3

= 10

0%Y4

= 10

0%Y5

= 10

0%Y6

= 10

0%Y7

= 10

0%Y8

= 10

0%Y9

= 10

0%Y0

= 10

0%

1.

Plan

ning

& D

esig

n: P

rom

ote

safe

r pl

anni

ng a

nd d

esign

of r

oad

infra

struc

ture

by

revis

ing/

dev

elopi

ng, s

harin

g &

enfo

rcin

g sta

ndar

ds fo

r saf

e ro

ad d

esign

an

d op

erat

ion, I

nfl u

ence

long

term

ur

ban

plan

ning

to e

nsur

e sa

fe ro

ads a

nd

trans

port,

con

sider

ing

trans

port

dem

and

man

agem

ent,

land

use

man

agem

ent

and

all m

odes

of t

rans

port

in p

lanni

ng

and

desig

n of

infra

struc

ture

; con

sider

ing

hum

an a

nd ve

hicle

fact

ors,

espe

cially

sp

eed

sens

itive

desig

n; in

tegr

ate

new

stand

ards

in in

main

tena

nce

prog

ram

mes

–b

ased

on

SADC

stan

dard

s; Pr

omot

e th

e Sa

fer S

yste

m A

ppro

ach

and

the

role

of se

lf-ex

plain

ing

and

forg

iving

road

in

frastr

uctu

re; s

et m

inim

um sa

fety

ratin

gs

for n

ew d

esign

s and

road

inve

stmen

ts (C

2)

1Y

MW

T

RA

NR

SCG

IZLA

s

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

2.

Plan

ning

& D

esig

n: D

irect

pur

pose

ful

effo

rts to

the

plan

ning

and

des

ign o

f saf

er

road

s for

non

-mot

orise

d tra

nspo

rt (C

4)1

NLA

RA

Cons

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

3.

Inte

grat

ed tr

ansp

ort s

afet

y pla

ns:

Deve

lop in

tegr

ated

tran

spor

t saf

ety p

lans

for a

ll 13

regio

ns, i

ncl.

esta

blish

men

t of

form

al in

frastr

uctu

re p

lanni

ng st

ruct

ures

at

loca

l leve

l (C5

)

2N

MW

TR

AN

RSC

GIZ

2000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

Audi

t urb

an p

lans

and

des

igns

and

m

ake

reco

mm

enda

tions

for s

afer

tra

nspo

rt; h

ighlig

ht u

nsaf

e pl

ans a

nd

desig

ns; r

ecom

men

d im

prov

emen

ts

2N

RA

LAs

Tshi

p B

oard

Cons

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

5.

Esta

blish

a h

azar

dous

acc

iden

t loc

atio

n im

prov

emen

t sys

tem

with

a m

ulti-

disc

iplin

ary a

ccid

ent i

nves

tigat

ion te

am &

pr

ogra

mm

e (C

3)

1M

WT

NR

SCR

AN

Pol

MoJ

GIZ

1000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

6.

Road

safe

ty a

udits

: Do

regu

lar sy

stem

atic

road

safe

ty au

dits/

asse

ssm

ents

on

all n

ew a

nd e

xistin

g ro

ads a

ccor

ding

to

act

/ pro

cedu

res &

reco

mm

end

im

prov

emen

ts, in

cl. a

ccid

ent p

rone

in

frastr

uctu

re si

tes (

C1.3

); up

date

the

syste

m/R

MS

RA

MW

TN

RSC

GTZ

5000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

Decade of Action.indd 31Decade of Action.indd 31 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.32

7.

Road

safe

ty a

udits

: Do

regu

lar sy

stem

atic

road

safe

ty au

dits/

asse

ssm

ents

on

non-

mot

orise

d fa

cilitie

s at r

egion

al lev

el, a

ccor

ding

to a

ct/ p

roce

dure

s &

reco

mm

end

impr

ovem

ents

incl.

Saf

e Ro

utes

to S

choo

l Pro

ject (

C4.1

)

RCs LAs

MW

TR

A20

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

8.

RMS:

Mak

e be

tter u

se o

f the

RM

S by

co

llect

ing

and

shar

ing

info

rmat

ion

with

ot

her R

oad

Safe

ty T

hem

es0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

9.

Impr

ove

infra

stru

ctur

e an

d fa

cilit

ies

for n

on-m

otor

ised

tran

spor

t, e.

g. s

afe

walk

ways

, cro

ssin

gs a

nd b

icyc

le la

nes

(C4.

3); i

mpl

emen

t Saf

e Ro

utes

to

Scho

ol P

roje

ct (C

4.4)

RCs LAs

MW

TR

A10

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

10.

Prov

ide

infra

stru

ctur

e an

d fa

cilit

ies

for

publ

ic tr

ansp

ort,

incl

. tax

i ran

ks &

bus

st

ops

(con

tribu

te fu

nds?

)LA

NR

SCR

AM

WT

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

11.

Rest

pla

ces:

Pro

vide

safe

rest

pla

ces

alon

g al

l mai

n ro

ads

RA

LA0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

12.

Mon

itor R

A co

nstru

ctio

n of

90k

m/a

of

new

road

s; 1

40km

/a m

ain

road

re

habi

litat

ion;

upg

radi

ng o

f 100

km

/a o

f roa

ds to

bitu

men

sta

ndar

d;

repl

acem

ent o

f 100

% o

f los

t gra

vel

on g

rave

l roa

ds a

nd re

surfa

ce 1

0%/a

of

road

net

work

; mai

ntai

n go

od ra

tio

betw

een

new

and

mai

nten

ance

pr

ojec

ts

NR

SCR

ALA

s0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

13.

Blac

k sp

ots:

Rem

ove

all b

lack

spo

ts,

incl

udin

g sa

fer r

oad

envir

onm

ents

, ba

sed

on R

MS

RA

RFA LAs

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

14.

Spee

d lim

its: R

evie

w an

d se

t ap

prop

riate

spe

ed li

mits

for a

ll se

ctio

ns

of ro

ads,

bas

ed o

n le

gisla

tion

MW

TN

Pol

LAs

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

15.

Impr

ove

sign

age

and

road

mar

king

s on

road

s, b

ased

on

audi

t fi n

ding

s0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

16.

Ensu

re w

ork

zone

saf

ety

at

cons

truct

ion

proj

ects

, bas

ed o

n 19

99

legi

slatio

n10

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 32Decade of Action.indd 32 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 33

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

Obj

ectiv

e

PrAcc

PI (S

MA

RT

ito

CTQ

Q)

Targ

etIn

itiat

ive

PrY/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot

Est

Cos

t(0

00s)

Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5Y6Y7Y8Y9Y0

3.

Good

MIS

, Pe

rform

ance

M

anag

emen

t and

R&

D

- M

easu

re

- Ev

alua

te

- Re

port

- Im

prov

e

- Le

arn

- Dr

ive &

Dia

logu

e

- U

pdat

e pl

ans

2

RA / MWT

a)

MIS

in p

lace

, sha

red

an

d pr

oper

ly ut

ilised

fo

r dec

ision

-mak

ing

b)

Valu

e of

Roa

d in

form

atio

n fo

r de

cisio

n m

akin

g

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

MIS

: Lin

k ro

ad s

ectio

ns to

acc

iden

t st

atist

ics

and

anal

yse

to c

ateg

orise

ro

ads

in te

rms

of s

afet

y10

00X

X

2.

Desi

gn s

tand

ards

: Ass

ess

to

what

ext

ent d

esig

n st

anda

rds

and

prin

cipl

es a

re a

ppro

pria

te a

nd a

pplie

d / i

mpl

emen

ted;

regu

larly

revie

w th

e ro

ad d

esig

n st

anda

rds

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

3.

Do b

usin

ess

case

s fo

r saf

er ro

ad

infra

stru

ctur

e to

mee

t DoA

targ

ets;

sh

are

rese

arch

fi nd

ings

1000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

Mon

itor t

he s

afet

y pe

rform

ance

of

inve

stm

ents

in ro

ad in

frast

ruct

ure

by

RA, L

As &

oth

er a

genc

ies

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

R&D:

Pro

mot

e R&

D in

infra

stru

ctur

e sa

fety

impr

ovem

ents

; Pro

mot

e pi

lot/

dem

onst

ratio

n pr

ojec

ts to

eva

luat

e sa

fety

impr

ovem

ents

/inn

ovat

ions

, es

peci

ally

for v

ulne

rabl

e ro

ad u

sers

1000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

6.

Them

e Co

mm

ittee

& P

erfo

rman

ce

Mgt

: Est

ablis

h Th

eme

E Co

mm

ittee

on

Road

Saf

ety

and

Mee

t ann

ually

in F

eb

for p

lann

ing

& bu

dget

ing;

Wor

ksho

p in

Aug

ust t

o ev

alua

te p

erfo

rman

ce

& to

pre

pare

for a

nnua

l Nat

iona

l Co

nfer

ence

in O

ctob

er

NR

SCD

onor

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

7.

ITS:

Inve

stig

ate

depl

oym

ent o

f in

tellig

ent t

rans

port

info

rmat

ion

and

cont

rol s

yste

ms

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

8.

Perfo

rman

ce M

gt: S

hare

rese

arch

an

d pe

rform

ance

fi nd

ings

; pro

mot

e di

alog

ue to

pro

mot

e le

arni

ng0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

9.

Upd

ate

Plan

s: S

trate

gy a

nd P

roje

ct /

Initi

ative

Pla

ns0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

Decade of Action.indd 33Decade of Action.indd 33 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.34

THEM

E F:

EM

ERGE

NCY

RESP

ONSE

[PIL

LAR

5]

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

Capa

cita

ted

Emer

genc

y R

espo

nse

Inst

itutio

ns

with

goo

d Sy

nerg

y

Capa

city

ach

ieve

d th

roug

h:-

Hum

an R

esou

rces

- St

ruct

ural

Res

ourc

es

- Ph

ysic

al R

esou

rces

- M

onet

ary

Reso

urce

s

- Re

latio

nal R

esou

rces

2

MoHSS

a)

No

of tr

aine

d BL

S (b

asic

life

sup

port

staf

f) fo

r 24

h se

rvic

e;

5/am

bula

nce

for a

4

shift

sys

tem

b)

Fully

equ

ippe

d am

bula

nces

per

1 p

er

popu

latio

n

c)

Avai

labi

lity

of re

quire

d ve

hicl

es, e

quip

men

t &

mat

eria

ls

BL=

70

Y1=

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

600

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

2500

BL=

TB

DY1

= 30

kY2

= 25

kY3

= 20

kY4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

= 10

k

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

All R

esou

rces

: Rev

iew

the

capa

city

de

velo

pmen

t pla

n ba

sed

on c

apac

ity

need

s as

sess

men

t for

road

saf

ety

emer

genc

y re

spon

se (

refe

r to

exist

ing

EMS

repo

rt) –

The

me

Com

mitt

ee to

upd

ate

annu

ally

(D1.

2)

MH

SM

VAF

J15

00X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

2.

HR:

Bui

ld h

uman

cap

acity

acc

ordi

ng

to p

lan

– th

roug

h st

affi n

g of

e.g

. BL

S, IL

S, p

aram

edic

s/AL

S &

reha

b pr

ofes

siona

ls (c

ontri

bute

to 3

0%)

MH

SOt

hers

1200

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

3.

HR:

Bui

ld h

uman

cap

acity

acc

ordi

ng

to p

lan

– th

roug

h sk

ills d

evel

opm

ent /

tra

inin

g of

e.g

. BLS

, ILS

, par

amed

ics/

AL

S &

reha

b pr

ofes

siona

ls, in

cl.

train

ing

of B

LS (1

26 p

a in

itial

ly), p

ost

grad

uate

s –

by C

olle

ges

(D1.

4, D

3)

– 10

% fu

ndin

g co

ntrib

utio

n

MH

S

MVA

FPr

ivLA

sM

oD

2000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

4.

Phys

ical

Res

ourc

es: D

evel

op

fully

equ

ippe

d tre

atm

ent a

nd

reha

bilit

atio

n fa

cilit

ies

/ cen

tres

(D1)

, in

cl. a

dapt

atio

n of

hou

ses;

pro

vide/

build

13

reha

b ce

ntre

s (fu

ndin

g co

ntrib

utio

n to

min

istrie

s)

MoH

SSM

VAF

5000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

5.

Phys

ical

Res

ourc

es: A

cqui

re fu

lly

equi

pped

veh

icle

s, in

cl. a

mbu

lanc

es

and

resc

ue v

ehic

les

(D1)

; fun

ding

co

ntrib

utio

n of

10

ambu

lanc

es p

er

annu

m; a

ppro

x. 4

0/a

prov

ided

by

GRN

– 1

0% fu

ndin

g co

ntrib

utio

n

MH

SM

VAF

6000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

6.

Rela

tiona

l Res

ourc

es: I

mpr

ove

rela

tions

, bui

ld a

llianc

es &

pa

rtner

ship

s in

the

Them

e (lo

cal,

regi

onal

& in

tern

atio

nal)

MH

SM

VAF

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 34Decade of Action.indd 34 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 35

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

STAK

EHO

LDER

S IN

CL.:

1.

Emer

genc

y Se

rvic

es:

MoH

SS A

mbu

lanc

e Se

rvic

es, I

SOS,

E-M

ed

Res

cue

24, C

omm

unity

B

ased

Em

erge

ncy

Serv

ices

, MVA

F, C

oW

Traf

fi c -P

ublic

Saf

ety,

LA

s

2.

Hos

pita

l tre

atm

ent:

MoH

SS, P

rivat

e H

ospi

tals

& C

linic

s

3.

Reha

bilit

atio

n:M

oHSS

, Priv

ate

Hos

p, R

ehab

Cen

tres,

Co

mm

unity

Hea

lth

Wor

kers

/Vol

unte

ers,

M

VAF,

d)

No

of tr

aum

a re

spon

se

and

care

cen

tres

e)

No

of c

apac

itate

d re

habi

litat

ion

cent

res

acco

rdin

g to

min

imum

st

anda

rds

f) %

of r

equi

red

fund

ing

appr

oved

to e

xecu

te

Them

e F

initi

ative

s fo

r th

e ye

ar

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

0Y1

= 1

Y2=

3Y3

= 4

Y4=

5Y5

= 7

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

13

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

Decade of Action.indd 35Decade of Action.indd 35 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.36

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

2.

Effe

ctiv

e &

Effi c

ient

Re

scue

, Tre

atm

ent

& Re

habi

litat

ion

Oper

atio

ns

1

MoHSS

a)

Resc

ue: P

ropo

rtion

of

all e

mer

genc

y re

scue

re

spon

ses

prov

ided

wi

thin

1 h

our (

gold

en

hour

) (fro

m ti

me

of

acci

dent

and

arri

val o

f re

spon

se a

t site

)

b)

Pre-

hosp

ital:

Prop

ortio

n of

crit

ical

ly in

jure

d pe

ople

in

hand

s of

em

erge

ncy

staf

f who

die

d on

the

scen

e, e

nrou

te to

ho

spita

l

c)

Trea

tmen

t: Pr

opor

tion

of p

atie

nts

who

died

in

hosp

ital

d)

Prop

ortio

n of

pat

ient

s su

cces

sful

ly in

tegr

ated

in

com

mun

ity a

fter

reha

bilit

atio

n

BL=

40

% ?

Y1=

50Y2

= 60

Y3=

70Y4

= 75

Y5=

80%

?Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

= 95

% ?

BL=

TB

DY1

= %

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

BL=

TB

DY1

= %

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

BL=

TB

DY1

= %

Y2=

Y3=

Y4=

Y5=

Y6=

Y7=

Y8=

Y9=

Y0=

1.

Resp

onse

tim

es: D

evel

op p

roce

ss fo

r im

prov

ed re

spon

se ti

me

by m

eans

of

impr

oved

qua

lity

of re

spon

se

oper

atio

ns; i

nves

tigat

e de

lays

; co

nsid

erin

g sa

fe s

peed

ing

1N

MoH

SSM

VAF

MW

TJ

2000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

2.

Resp

onse

/Tec

hnol

ogy:

Inve

stig

ate/

pilo

t/use

tech

nolo

gy in

car

s to

au

tom

atic

ally

signa

ls ac

cide

nt to

ca

ll ce

ntre

on

any

impa

ct (n

eede

d es

peci

ally

for r

emot

e ar

eas)

, bas

ed

on tr

acki

ng d

evic

es (l

ink

to T

hem

e D)

MW

T

RA NRS

CM

oHSS

MVA

F

2000

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

3.

Resp

onse

trea

tmen

t: Pr

ovid

e ap

prop

riate

em

erge

ncy

treat

men

t on

site

MoH

SSAL

L0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

4.

One

natio

nal e

mer

genc

y ca

ll ce

ntre

: Op

erat

e th

e sin

gle

natio

nwid

e te

leph

one

num

ber f

or e

mer

genc

ies

MoH

SSOP

MN

RSC

NPo

l10

000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Hos

pita

l tre

atm

ent:

Deve

lop

an

impr

oved

pre

hosp

ital c

are

syst

ems

and

hosp

ital t

raum

a ca

re s

yste

m;

Prov

ide

appr

opria

te e

mer

genc

y tre

atm

ent

at c

entre

s (D

1)

MoH

SSM

VAF

RCC

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

6.

Reha

bilit

atio

n: P

rovid

e ap

prop

riate

re

habi

litat

ion

treat

men

t at c

entre

s;

incl

. psy

chol

ogic

al/s

pirit

ual s

uppo

rt;

incl

ude

fam

ily

MoH

SSM

VAF

LA0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

7.

Reha

bilit

atio

n: E

stab

lish

appr

opria

te

road

use

r ins

uran

ce s

chem

e; g

reen

ca

rd; f

rom

fuel

levie

sM

WT

MVA

F M

OFM

ME

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

8.

Reha

bilit

atio

n: P

rom

ote

and

prov

ide

ince

ntive

s fo

r em

ploy

ers

to h

ire a

nd

reta

in p

eopl

e wi

th d

isabi

litie

s; li

nk

to c

omm

unity

-bas

ed re

hab

syst

em;

enfo

rce

faci

litie

s al

so p

rovid

e ac

cess

to

peo

ple

with

disa

bilit

ies

MoL

MH

SM

VAF

NRS

CN

DC LA

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

9.

Faci

litie

s m

gt: M

aint

enan

ce &

re

plac

emen

t of a

ll bu

ildin

gs &

eq

uipm

ent

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 36Decade of Action.indd 36 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT. 37

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

3.

Good

MIS

, Pe

rform

ance

M

anag

emen

t and

R&

D

- M

easu

re

- Ev

alua

te

- Re

port

- Im

prov

e

- Le

arn

- Dr

ive &

Dia

logu

e

- U

pdat

e pl

ans

2

MoHSS

a)

Avai

labi

lity

and

use

of

inte

grat

ed h

ealth

and

ac

cide

nt in

form

atio

n fo

r dec

ision

-mak

ing

b)

Valu

e of

hea

lth a

nd

acci

dent

info

rmat

ion

for d

ecisi

on m

akin

g

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

BL=

Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

=

1.

Call

Cent

re: I

mpr

ove

the

incid

ent

man

agem

ent s

yste

m;

esta

blish

a

Natio

nal C

all C

entre

with

one

tel n

umbe

r to

pro

mot

e ea

rly a

cces

s; ro

ll out

pilo

t na

tiona

lly (i

ncl.

all e

mer

genc

ies;

cont

ribut

e 30

% to

esta

blish

men

t cos

t (D2

)

OPM

(EM

U)

NRS

CM

HS

MVA

F10

000

XX

2.

Impr

ove

exist

ing

Healt

h In

form

ation

Mgt

Sy

stem

by i

nteg

ratin

g he

alth

info

rmat

ion

with

acc

iden

t inf

orm

ation

; inc

lude

Inju

ry

surv

eillan

ce, m

easu

ring

perfo

rman

ce in

Ro

ad S

afet

y Em

erge

ncy R

espo

nse,

with

an

alytic

al fe

atur

es; b

ased

on

iden

tifi ed

all

dat

a ne

eds;

impr

ove

inte

rface

s with

all

relev

ant s

yste

ms;

mak

e it

web

base

d (D

3)

MoH

SSM

WT

Othe

r50

00X

XX

3.

Regu

larly

mea

sure

and

cap

ture

pe

rform

ance

; coll

ect n

ation

al fi g

ures

on

all

resc

ue o

pera

tions

and

resp

onse

tim

es a

nd

effi c

iencie

s; typ

e of

inju

ry c

ausin

g de

ath;

typ

e of

acc

iden

t, et

c. (D

2, D

3)

MoH

SS0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

4.

Evalu

ate p

erfo

rman

ce in

form

ation

; th

e ef

fect

ivene

ss a

nd e

ffi cie

ncy o

f the

em

erge

ncy s

ervic

es a

nd lo

nger

term

re

habi

litatio

n –

analy

sis &

synt

h

MoH

SS0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

5.

Lega

l res

pons

es: b

ased

on

thor

ough

re

sear

ch, a

pply

effe

ctive

lega

l res

pons

es

to ro

ad d

eath

s and

inju

ries;

enco

urag

e fa

ir se

ttlem

ents

and

justi

ce fo

r the

ber

eave

d an

d in

jure

d

MW

TM

oHSS

MVA

F0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

6.

Prom

ote

R&D:

Bas

ed o

n pe

rform

ance

in

form

ation

, im

prov

e in

vesti

gatio

ns in

to

accid

ents;

impr

ove

post-

cras

h re

spon

se;

bette

r tre

atm

ent o

f spe

cifi c

inju

ries;

inve

stiga

te re

ason

s for

dea

th d

urin

g go

lden

hou

r and

at h

ospi

tals;

Inju

ry

surv

eillan

ce

MoH

SSM

VAF

MW

TN

RSC

1000

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

7.

Them

e Co

mm

ittee

& P

erf M

gt: E

stabl

ish

Them

e F

Com

mitt

ee o

n Ro

ad S

afet

y an

d M

eet a

nnua

lly in

Feb

for p

lanni

ng

& bu

dget

ing;

Wor

ksho

p in

Aug

ust t

o ev

aluat

e pe

rform

ance

& to

pre

pare

for

annu

al Na

tiona

l Con

fere

nce

in O

ctob

er

NRS

CDo

nor

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

8.

Perfo

rman

ce M

gt: S

hare

rese

arch

and

pe

rform

ance

fi nd

ings

; pro

mot

e di

alogu

e to

pr

omot

e lea

rnin

g0

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

9.

Upda

te P

lans:

Stra

tegy

and

Pro

ject /

In

itiativ

e Pl

ans

0X

XX

XX

XX

XX

X

Decade of Action.indd 37Decade of Action.indd 37 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM

National DoA for Road Safety 2011-2020

WEAR.BELIEVE.ACT.38

OUTP

UTS

& OU

TCOM

ES

Obje

ctiv

e

Pr

Acc

PI (S

MAR

T ito

CTQ

Q)Ta

rget

Initi

ativ

e

Pr

Y/N

Resp

Supp

SJO

Tot E

st

Cost

(000

s)

Y1

Y2

Y3

Y4

Y5

Y6

Y7

Y8

Y9

Y0

Soci

o -E

cono

mic

–

Envi

ronm

en-ta

l Res

ults

2

NRSC C

a)

Soci

al: A

nnua

l No

of

road

cas

ualti

es

b)

Soci

al: A

nnua

l No

of ro

ad fa

talit

ies

per

100,

000

popu

latio

n

c)

Econ

omic

: Cos

t of

road

traf

fi c a

ccid

ents

to

Nam

ibia

[% o

f GD

P]

d)

Inve

stm

ent i

n ro

ad

safe

ty a

s %

of t

otal

ro

ad in

fra in

vest

men

t

BL=

300

Y1=

282

Y2=

264

Y3=

246

Y4=

228

Y5=

210

Y6=

198

Y7=

186

Y8=

174

Y9=

162

Y0=

150

BL=

16

Y1=

15.5

Y2=

15Y3

= 14

.5Y4

= 14

Y5=

13.5

Y6=

13Y7

= 12

.5Y8

= 12

Y9=

11.5

Y0=

11

BL=

2.0

0Y1

= Y2

= Y3

= Y4

= Y5

= Y6

= Y7

= Y8

= Y9

= Y0

= 1.

00 ?

BL=

1%

?Y1

0= 1

0%

Decade of Action.indd 38Decade of Action.indd 38 6/21/12 12:09 PM6/21/12 12:09 PM