the journal as index and incentive for data publication myles axton editor, nature genetics...
TRANSCRIPT
The journal as index and incentive for data publication
Myles AxtonEditor, Nature Genetics
CambridgeOct 23rd 2011
Nature quality primary research in genetics and genomics
- Professional editors choose which papers to publish
- Peer referees provide technical guidance to improve the work
- Editorial standards and decision criteria are constantly revised in light of referee advice, author comments, conference presentations and lab visits
- Standards of the journal constantly get higher
All Nature Research Journals use two basic criteria for decisions:
Novelty: new data, new resource
Conceptual advance: new ideas, new strategies
Plus:
Nature: Is this work of general interest to all scientists, to decision makers or to the public?
Nature Genetics: How many other researchers will do their research differently as a result of this work?
Scope of Nature Genetics
Common/complex diseases - RiskGene networks - Wiring
CancerHuman disease geneticsPharmacological genomicsEpigeneticsDevelopmental geneticsFunctional genomicsStem cell geneticsGenetic technologyGenome evolution
Results, data, funding and contributors
Footnotes and XML tags for contributor roles
Publisher metadata transmitted to popular sites
Better information and metrics for authors and funders
Citable data management plans by data producers
- Citable by unique digital object identifier (DOI) that points to current version.
- Previous versions stored and independently citable.
- Project descriptions (“marker papers”) grouped in a Collection together with funder policy documents and community standards papers.
What conventions and accession codes do 8 journals enforce?
Annals of Human Genetics, Genetics in Medicine, Genome Research, Human Mutation,
Journal of Human Genetics, Journal of Medical Genetics, Nature Genetics, PLoS Biology
Grant and funder information 6 by initials, 3 optional
Competing financial interests 5 publish, 1 if positive, 2 optional
OMIM accession 4 mandate, 4 do not
HGNC gene names 4 throughout, 3 first use, 2 no obligation
Model organism database: genes 4 mandate mouse, 3 all models
DNA sequence 4 public deposit, 2 encourage, 2 no obligation
Primer sequences 4 mandate publication, 4 no obligation
Expression array 3 mandate, 2 encourage, 3 no obligation
LOVD deposition of human variants 3 endorse, 5 not policy
Prepublication data sharing 2 for review, 1 if referees, 1 no enforcement, 4 no policy
Postpublication data sharing 2 enforce, 1 policy, 5 no policy
NCBI/EBI deposition of human variants 2 mandate, 3 endorse, 3 not policy
Author contribution statement 2 by initials, 4 optional, 1 in supplementary information
HGVS allele nomenclature 1 throughout, 1 first use, 2 optional, 4 no policy
Pilot study in data publishing and citation
Thomson ReutersJoel HammondBruce Kiesel
NPGMyles AxtonTony Hammond
Penn. State U.Belinda Giardine
Erasmus Med. Cent.Bharat Singh
Free U. AmsterdamPaul Groth
Leiden U. Med. Cent.Herman van HaagenErik SchultesBarend MonsIvo FokkemaJohan den Dunnen
Microattribution
Journals provide citation links from paper to paper. Quantitative citation provides a rough measure of usefulness.
Database accessions should be traceable to their original source.
Citations to database accessions in peer reviewed papers and in database entries should be counted and the count made public.
Microcitation provides incentive for collaborative genome annotation and a more accurate picture of individual and group research activity.
Microattribution can be extended to web traffic analysis.
Microattribution is an incentive to database deposition
Microattribution started
Human Variome Microattribution Review (Hemoglobin)
http://www.bx.psu.edu/~giardine/
RDF/XML triplet with provenance metadata
Supplementary Table 1 Nanopublications of the form [HGVS gene variant name][has][Variant frequency]
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:n="http://example/schema/"> <n:nanopublication rdf:about="#2000"> <n:triplet> <rdf:Statement> <rdf:subjectrdf:resource="http://example/id/NG_000007.3:g.70628G>A"/> <rdf:predicaterdf:resource="http://example/genetics/has-variant-frequency"/> <rdf:object>0.25%</rdf:object> </rdf:Statement> </n:triplet> <n:condition>Sardinian</n:condition> <n:provenance> <rdf:Description> <n:researcherID>HbVar (A-2391-2010)</n:researcherID> <n:DOI rdf:resource="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.785"/> <n:PMID rdf:resource="info:pmid/6695908"/> <n:PMID rdf:resource="info:pmid/1428944"/> <n:PMID rdf:resource="info:pmid/1610915"/> <n:linkoutrdf:resource="http://globin.bx.psu.edu/cgi-bin/hbvar/query_vars3?mode=output&display_format=page&i=239;http://phencode.bx.psu.edu/cgi-bin/phencode/phencode?build=hg18&id=HbVar.239"/> </rdf:Description> </n:provenance> </n:nanopublication></rdf:RDF>
Our experiments suggest articles are a poor source of data
Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD)196,000 variants in 3,267 genes from 84,937 individuals Giardine et al. (ng.785) 1,901 unique variants in 37 genes affecting hemoglobin levels
1) Text search 10m PubMed abstracts with 4,940 gene variants of 11 genes in LOVD.
16 out of 10,000,000 abstracts contained gene variants from the search set
2) Search for 2,545 DMD variants in the full text of 109 articles on Duchenne muscular dystrophy selected by LOVD curator Johan den Dunnen.
625 out of 2,545 variants were found in 22 out of 109 articles (2,565 total mentions)
3) Search all LOVD entries with PubMed PMIDs indicating Nature Genetics articles.
LOVD database linked a gene variant to 19 of 36 articles. Only 3 articles mention the variant in unambiguous HGVS nomenclature in the text.
4) Text mining ng.785 for nanopublications concerning all biomedical concepts.
a) From the article, 13 out of a total of 698 nanopublications assert genetic variation
b) From the Supplementary Tables, 1,734 nanopublications of the form [HGVS variant][has][OMIM VarID]
and 121 of the form [HGVS variant][has][variant frequency]
c) >40,000 nanopublications from the HbVarDB described by the article
Scholarly communication
Current Proposed
Nature Genetics 43, 281–283 (2011) doi:10.1038/ng0411-281
Thank you!