the “insertion” error in solving linear equations kosze lee and jon r. star, michigan state...
TRANSCRIPT
The “Insertion” Error in Solving Linear EquationsKosze Lee and Jon R. Star, Michigan State University
Table 1: Transcripts of Adam’s interview Solve 4(x + 3) = 8x Adam Oh, ok I got to change. That would be (writes down 4x +12 =8x) INT Ok. And then what did you decide to do with it at this point? Adam Um, The MOVE step? INT Ok. What did you decide to move? Adam the "8". So then that would be (writes down 8 8) INT So um, if you going to MOVE the "8x", what is that going to look like in terms of
what, what you have to do. So can you tell me aloud? Adam you MOVE the "4x"? I mean then you would subtract each~ from the 4x. INT Ok, so then you would, minus 8x over here(points to "8" on the left) and what
would you do on this side? (points to "8" on the right) Adam Minus 8x over there. INT Ok, so then remember you start out with what you have and then you minus the
"8x". So write down what you have and minus the 8x on that line. Adam Ok, I would (writes down 8x after the "8" on the left and 4x after the "8" on the
right) it's 4x and you have the 8x, and the 8x (writes down "x" beside both "8" to become "8x").
INT See, um, if you look at what Dr Star did, like he took away,um, he decided to MOVE the "2x". So he took away the "2x" here(points to the "-2x" on the left side of an equation) and he took away the 2x here (points to the "-2x" on the other side of the equation.)
Adam Oh, so I did the wrong, and this (points to 8x - 4x) should be over here (points to 8x - 8x)
INT Yeah. Adam Oh, ok. (write the line "8x - 4x 8x - 8x)
IntroductionThis proposed research investigates a
particular phenomenon that occurred during a
study of students’ flexibility in solving linear
equations (Star, 2004).
Method153 6th graders participated in five hours
(over five days) of algebra problem solving. In the
first hour, the students were given a pretest and a
brief lesson on four different steps that could be
used to solve algebraic equations (adding to both
sides, multiplying on both sides, distributing, and
combining like terms). Students then spent three
hours solving a series of unfamiliar linear
equations with minimal facilitation. 23 students
(randomly selected from all participants) were
interviewed while working individually with a
tutor/interviewer. On the last day of the project,
students completed a post-test.
ResultsAnalyses of students’ work made apparent an
interesting type of error, named “insertion”, in 12
(7.8%) students’ of which three (given the
pseudonyms as Adam, Bryan and Cindy) were
interviewed. The insertion error was evident when
3x = 6x + 6 became 6x 3x = 6x 6x + 6.
Similarly, 2(x + 5) = 4(x + 5) became 2 – 2(x + 5)
= 4 – 2(x + 5). In another case, 2(x + 1) = 10
became 2(x + 1 – 1) = 10 – 1. Interestingly, this
type of errors has not previously been reported
nor classified in the literature on linear equation
solving (e.g., Matz, 1980; Payne & Squibb, 1990).
Out of the many proposed classifications of
students’ rule-based errors in computational or
algebraic problems (Matz, 1980; Payne & Squibb,
1990; Sleeman, 1984), Ben-Zeev’s (1998)
classification is the most relevant here. Its
context of solving unfamiliar problems is very
similar to the context of the present research. In
this framework, the errors are classified into two
major types: critic-related failures and inductive
failures.
Contact Information
Jon R. Star, [email protected]; Kosze Lee [email protected].
College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing,
Michigan, 48824. This poster can be downloaded at
www.msu.edu/~jonstar.
ReferencesBen-Zeev, T. (1998). Rational errors and the mathematical
mind. Review of General Psychology, 2(4), 366-383.
Matz, M. (1980). Towards a computational theory of
algebraic competence. Journal of Mathematical Behavior,
3(1), 93-166.
Payne, S. J., & Squibb, H. R. (1990). Algebra mal-rules and
cognitive accounts of error. Cognitive Science, 14(3), 445-
481.
Star, J. R. (2004). The development of flexible procedural
knowledge of equation solving. Paper presented at the
American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Critic-related failures are due to the students’
failure to signal a violation of a rule while
inductive failures are due to student’s over-
generalization or over-specialization of
conceptual interpretations or surface-structural
features of worked examples. Here the latter,
“syntactic induction”, is useful in our analysis.
The interview transcripts of three students
suggest that they have over-generalized the
procedure of subtracting the same term on both
sides in order to eliminate a term of a linear
equation. As a result, two erroneous procedures
are created – one that violates the subtraction
law by inserting “TERM –” to both sides, and the
other that violates the distributive law by
inserting “ – TERM” in between a coefficient p and
its associated term (x + n) or inside the
parenthesis. The former is seen in Adam’s
transcript (Table 1) while Cindy (Table 2) and
Bryan (Figure 2) makes the latter error. However,
they stopped making these errors after they were
made aware of the violation of such rules.
ConclusionsThe data analysis thus proposes to include the
following into Ben-Zeev’s classification: 1)
another critic-based failure whereby prior rules
can be suppressed by the desired effect of a new
procedure, and 2) errors which are generated by
the confluence of over-generalized rules and
critic-based failures even though this may be rare
in the case of the “insertion” error.
Table 2 Transcripts of Cindy’s interview Solve 2(x + 1) = 10 Cindy (Writes down "2(x+1-1) = 10-1"; followed by "2(x+0) = 9")
INT
Um, if you choose the MOVE, one of the things about the MOVE, is that, um, you can't MOVE, um, anything, you,, you can't MOVE something from a parenthesis.
Cindy Oh, ok. Um. (long pause) Um, I am not really sure what to do then. INT Ok.
Cindy Because I've already used the EXPAND as the first step, so that's all that I know that reallly like seems to make sense.
INT So what are the ones that you have done previously, is there any other that you might want to try?
Cindy
Well COMBINE won't work. EXPAND I can't do. MOVE woulld not work. Mm hmm. (shakes her pen) um, hmm. Maybe with the MOVE, can I subtract the two? (circle the "2" in "2(x+0) =9")?
INT
Actually, the "2" is connected to this not by addition or subtraction and usually you use the MOVE when there is, when you can add or subtract it. And "2" is multiplied to this, you don't, you don't add or subtract it so you couldn't MOVE the "2"..
Cindy What? INT You, you couldn't MOVE the "2". Cindy yeah.
Adam’s work that exhibits “insertion” error for the second time (“-3x” is a later correction)
Bryan’s work that exhibits both types of “insertion” errors that violate the distributive law
Figure 1 Figure 2