the ilva case

Upload: luigi-oliva

Post on 07-Aug-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    1/13

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    2/13

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    3/13

    © Mic hael Fa ur

    e

    Pete r De Smedt a nd An Stas 2015

    All rights reserved. No pa rt o f this public

    ation

    may be rep rod uced, s to red

    in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,

    mechanical

    or ph

    otocopying, recording,

    or

    otherwise with

    out

    the prior

    permission

    of

    the

    pu

    blisher.

    Published by

    Edward Elgar P

    ub

    lishing Limited

    The Lypiatts

    15

    Lansdown R oad

    Cheltenham

    G los GL50 2JA

    U

    Edward

    Elgar P

    ub

    lishing,

    In

    c.

    William P

    ratt

    House

    9 Dewey Court

    Nort h

    ampton

    Massac

    hu

    setts 0 1060

    USA

    A

    catalog

    ue record fo r this book

    is available from the British Library

    Library of Congress

    Contro

    l Number: 20 14954947

    This

    book

    is available electronically

    in

    the

    El

    gar

    online

    Law subject co llection

    DOl 10.4337/978 178347740 I

    j

    FSC

    -- 

    MIX

    aper rom

    rt po sl  l• so 

    FS O C 13 56

    ISBN 978 I 78347 739 5 cased)

    ISBN

    9 8

    I 78347 740 I eBook)

    Typeset by Scrvis Filmsetting Ltd. Stockport, Cheshire

    Printed and bound in Great Britain

    by

    T. J. In ternat ional Ltd, Pads t

    ow

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    4/13

      ontents

    List

    ojjigures

    List

    o

    ables

    List

    o

    contr

     

    utors

    List

    o

    abbreviations

    Intr

    od

    uction

    Mic/we/ Faw·e

    Pet

    er De

    Sm

    edt and

    n Stas

    PART 1 GENERAL THEOR Y

    Enviro nmenta l enforcement networks: theory practice and

    IX

    X

    XI

    XIV

    potent

    ia l 13

    Grant Pink

    2 B

    etter

    regulation   e

    nf

    orcement a

    nd

    networking:

    eo-depende

    ncy

    for th

    e globa.l

    env

    ironment 37

    Campbe/1 Gemme/1

    3 Connecting cultures: towa rds sustainable networking: key

    success factors for environme

    nt

    al

    cooperat

    ion across cultu res 59

    Esther Janssen

    4 The role o f netwo

    rk

    s in ensuring

    compl

    iance

    and

    strengthening

    coordi

    nation: a co

    mp

    a ra tive analysis on 1

    NECE

    ECENA 

    RE

    NA

    and

    REC

    Turkey

    68

    Zerrin SavaJWI

    5 Evaluating a nd assessi ng envir

    on

    mental enforcement networks:

    through use of the

    network

    evaluation ma

    tr

    ix 1

    05

    Grant Pink and

    lames

    Lehane

    PART

    II BENEFITS OF NETWORKS

    6 Towards a critical analysis of enviro nmenta l enforcement

    networks 1

    3

    Jwnes Lehane

    V

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    5/13

    VI

    Environmental e1 

    orcemem

    net

    wo

    r

    ks

    7

    Environment

    al enfor

    cement

    netwo rks: their value proposi tion

    dur

    ing tim es of red ucing resources and budgets 153

    Grant Pink

    8 En

    vironment

    al regula tio n a nd e

    nf

    orcement

    net

    wo

    rks

    op

    erati ng

    in tandem: a very effective vehicle for

    dr

    iving eflici

    enc

    ies and

    facil

    itating know

    ledge exchange

    and

    transfer 172

    Campbelf Gemmelf and Tony Circelfi

    9 Countering

    tr

    a nsnatio na l organized wildl ife crime: regional

    and sub

    -regional initi

    at

    ives, global responses

    and the

    need for

    more effective

    coor

    dina

    ti

    on 87

    Edward van Asclt

    I0

    Can

    superv

    ision

    and en

    for

    cement

    net

    wo

    rk

    s make

    self-regulation

    wor

    k? 223

    J

    V a

    rtin de Bree, Han de Haas and Paul Meerman

    PART Ill THEMATIC NETWORKS

    Th

    e Lusa ka Agreement T

    as

    k Force as a mechanism fo r

    enforcement

    against wildlife crime 239

    Emmanuel B. Kasimbazi

    2

    H untington geogr

    ap

    hic enforceme

    nt

    /co

    mpliance initia tive: a

    case study in mu lti-organisation networ king

    and

    coll

    abor

    ation 263

    Eugene Lubieniecki

    13 The European

    Un

    ion

    For

    um of Judges for

    the Environmen

    t 276

    Luc Lavrysen

    4 T he Seaport Environmental Security Ne twork : facilitating

    international enforcement collaboration to prevent illegal

    haz

    ardous

    waste shipments t

    hr

    oug

    h

    ports

    289

    Danielle Fest Grabiel, Robert George Heiss,

    A.feredith Koparova, Debomh Kopsick and Henk Ruessink

    PART IV HORIZONTAL NETWORKS

    15 North American

    working

    group on

    environmenta

    l

    e nforcement a nd co mpliance

    coo

    perat

    ion

    : mov ing from

    capaci ty building to oper

    atio

    nal activities

    Deborah Kopsick and Susan Elizabeth Bromm

    305

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    6/13

    ConteJIIs vii

    16 Informa l environmenta l networki

    ng

    : th e EPA Net

    work

    examp

    le 321

    William Fawcett

    17 Deve l

    oping

    and sustai ning environmental comp liance and

    enforcemen t

    networ

    ks: lessons learned fr

    om

    the Internationa l

    Netw

    o rk on E nviro

    nmental Comp

    lia nce and

    Enforcement

    334

    Jo

    Ge

    rardu Meredith Koparova. Kenneth Markowit:

    Dunvood

    Za

    e/ke and Gunnar Baldwin, Jr

    18

    Environmenta l inspections and

    environmental

    compliance

    assurance networks in

    the

    con text

    of

    European Un io n

    env ironment policy 350

    Miroslav Angelo v and Liam Caslnnan

    19 Success and fai

    lur

    e factors in developing effective

    env iron

    me

    n ta l enforcement networks:

    the

    case

    of

    the East

    A frica n

    Network

    for Environmenta l

    Compliance

    and

    Enforcement

    377

    Gerphas Opondo

    PART V VE RTICAL NETWORKS

    2

    Re

    gional env

    ir

    o

    nmental

    e

    nf

    o

    rc

    eme

    nt

    netwo rks

    in

    th

    e U nited

    States 393

    LeRoy Paddock

    2  Ghana  s efforts at

    environmental

    enforcement networks:

    le

    ga l

    and inst ituti onal struc tures

    41

    9

    Bem

    ad

    e

    tt

    e Araba

    dj

    ei and Larsey

    i vf

    ensah

    22 Effective

    netw

    orking, formal versus s

    ub

    sta ntia l

    comp

    liance,

    co

    nflicting powers:

    strengths

    a

    nd

    weaknesses o f enviro

    nm

    enta l

    criminal provisions enforcement netwo

    rks

    in Italy 430

    Gra:ia Maria Vagliasindi

    23

    Domestic environme

    nt

    al enforcement netwo rks: the pract ice of

    China 53

    Xinyuan Lu 

    Hu

    Qin and Jrm Yan g

    24 E nviro

    nment

    al enfo rcement networking efforts in C hile:

    lessons learnt and challenges

    ahead 7

    0

    Juan Carlos Monckeberg Kay Bergamini and Cristian Perez

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    7/13

      Environmental eJJ orcem

    em

    networks

    25

    En

    fo rcement of envi

    ronmenta

    l legislat io n by

    the

    Belgian po lice 482

    Frans Geysels

    26 The Flemish

    High Counc

    il

    of Environmental

    Enforcement

    the

    ro

    le

    of

    a n

    environme

    nta l

    enforcement ne

    t

    work

    in a new

    coo

    rdinated envi ro

    nm

    ental

    enforcement

    landscape within

    the

    Flemish region   2009- 2014 490

    Afichae/ Faure and n

    Stas

    Concluding

    and comparative remarks 5 0

    i\fichael Faure n

    Stas and

    P

    ete

    r De

    Smedt

    h1dex

    525

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    8/13

      nforcemenrnerworks

    in ra

    ly 447

    4. ENVIRONMENTAL MISCOMPLIANCE BY

    CORPORATIO

    NS

    CAUSI

    NG

    ENVIRONMENTAL,

    HEALTH

    AND

    ECONOMIC

    HARM

    :

    THE

    MI

    SS IN

    G

    NETWORK'

    AND

    CONFLICTI

    NG

    POWERS

    The

    te nsion

    between

    a forma l '

    compl

    iance'

    co

    nce

    pt

    , such as

    the one exem

    plified in

    the

    prev

    i

    ous

    section

    ,

    and

    a

    substantial compliance

    concept

    ,

    such

    as the o ne seen in

    th

    e

    intense

    contro l

    and

    inves tigative

    and

    enforceme

    nt

    activ

    ities agai ns t environm

    ental

    crimes carried

    ou

    t by po lice fo rces, pros-

    ecutors

    and

    judges,

    might

    create serious

    ne

    tworking '

    cha ll

    enges. A more

    detail

    ed

    d i

    sc

    ussion of a case can illus

    tr

    ate the

    point.

    4.1

    The

    Ilva Case

    The case in th is sense appears pa radigma

    tic

    (still under judgment), con-

    ce

    rn

    ing

    an

    Italian

    indu

    str

    ia l

    co

    mpan

    y -

    ll

    va

    S.p.a

    .,

    expo

    r

    ting

    its

    products

    t

    hr

    oughout Europe

    and

    beyond - and particularly its industria l plant in

    T

    aranto

    .

    Apparently the

    company

    didn ' t comply (a mong

    ot

    h

    er

    th ings) with

    environmental regulations (main ly

    the

    IPPC provisions),

    causing

    ser ious

    envi

    ronmenta

    l

    po

    llut

    ion

    (mainly through

    the

    emissions of polluting

    substances into the ai r) wh ich seems to have provok

    ed

    serious d amage

    to human and an im al hea lth, as well

    a.s

    consequential damage

    to other

    economic ac tivities in

    the

    area.

    29

    On 26 September 20 13 , a press release announced

    that

    the European

    Commission

    is

    taking action against

    It

    aly in an effort to reduce the environmental

    im

    pact of the Tlva steel plant in Taranto; while t he Commission sees recent com

    mitments made by the Ita lian authorities to address the situa tion as a positive sign,

    it is nevertheless ask ing lta ly to respect its o bliga tions under th e IPPC Directive

    and the Environmental Liabi

    li

    ty Directive; more information is ava

    il

    able a t http://

    europa.eu/rapid/press-release_

    lP

    - 13- 866_en.htm (accessed 10 October 20 13). On

    the various problematic issues raised by the Ilva case, see Gianfranco Amendola,

    'La magistra tura e

    il

    caso

    ll

    va. Prime ritlessioni ' (2012) Questione Giustizia,

    No. 5, 9; Angelo Merlin, 'Caso

    llva.lnquinamento

    e salute: a lcu

    ni

    pr

    ofili di rischio'

    (

    201

    2) Ambiente Sicurezza, No .

    20

    , 44; Marina Zalin and Luciano Butti , 'Ca

    so

    Jlva. Idoneitfa c lcgittimi

    tfa

    delle nuove disposizio ni dopo la convcrsione del D.L.'

    (20 13) Ambiente Sicurczza, No .

    2,

    80 ; Frances

    co

    Vigano, ' In questo numero'

    (2013) Dirit to penale contemporaneo, No. I, I; Roberto Bin, 'L'IIva e il

    so

    lda to

    Baldini' 20 13) Diritto penale contemporanea, No. I, 5; Alessandro Morelli, '

     

    decreto Jlva: un

    dram

    ma ti

    co

    bilanciamento tra principi costituzionali ' (20 13)

    D

    iri

    tto penale contemporanea, No. I,

    7;

    Angioletta Sperti, 'Aicune riflessioni sui

    profili costituziona li del decreto llva ' (20 13) Diritto penale contemporanea , No. I,

    12; Giuseppe Arconzo, '

    Note

    criticbe s

    ui

    decreto legge ad Ilvam , tra legislazione

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    9/13

    448

    Environmental 1 ~ o r c e m e m networ

    ks

    Th is resul ted in the managers a nd d

    ir

    ecto rs being a rrested and cha rg

    ed

    with several crim

    es

    : not only envi ronm

    enta

    l ones, but also c

    rim

    es rela ted

    to

    hea lth and safe ty in

    the wo

    rkpl

    ace

    as well as for

    the

    crime

    se

    t

    ou

    t u nder

    Article 434 of the Criminal Code (the

    so

    -c

    alled

    'unnamed

    disaster

    , in th is

    case

    defin

    ed

    as

    an

    ·enviro nme

    nt

    al di

    sas

    te r  ) .

    t

    al

    so

    r

    es

    ul

    ted

    in the

    pr

    ecaut

    io na ry

    se

    i

    zure

    of

    seve

    r

    al

    pro

    duct

    ive a r

    eas

    of the

    industrial

    plan t,

    wh

    i

    ch

    was issued p ursuan t to Article 321 of th e

    Criminal Procedu re Code by the judge for th e prel imina ry inquiry.

    T

    he se

    iz

    ur

    e or

    de

    r

    ca

    used a

    se

    r

    io

    us

    eco

    nomic t

    hrea

    t

    to the co

    m

    pa

    ny

    and to the hu

    nd

    reds of its employees, as th e

    se

    i

    zu

    re jud ic ial decree h

    ad

    excluded the poss

    ib

    ility o f u

    sing

    the

    concerne

    d areas of the plant pend ing

    the precautio nary seizure, therefore prec luding the possibili ty of cont inu

    ing prod

    uct

    ive

    ac

    tivity;

    it

    h

    as to

    be r

    eca ll

    ed

    that

    a seco

    nd

    pr

    ecau

    t

    io

    nary

    seizure was iss ued by the j udge of the preliminary inquiry , this time

    conc

    e

    rn

    ing

    mat

    eri

    als

    in stock as

    they

    were

    cons

    i

    der

    ed the

    prod

    uct of the

    crim

    es .

    In order to fa ce the

    econom

    ic consequences o f the seizure and the strong

    prot

    e

    sts

    of

    the

    e

    mploy

    ee

    s,

    30

    a

    Law

    D e

    cre

    e

    was the

    n ena

    cte

    d

    by

    the

    G overnment , a nd la

    ter

    converted in to Law by the Parlia ment,3

    1

    intro

    du

    c

    ing both general

    an

    d ad hoc pr

    ovis

    ions in order to a ll ow the

    in

    d ustria l

    plant

    to c

    on

    t

    inue

    operations

    ,

    desp

    i

    te the

    judici

    ary

    d

    ec

    ision to seize

    the

    plant a

    nd

    to s to p

    produc

    tion.

    provvedimentale, riserva di funzione giurisdiziona le e dovere di repressione e

    prcvcnzionc dei rcati' (20 13) Diritto pcnalc contcmporanco, No. I, 16; Domc

    ni

    co

    Pulitano, ' Fra giustizia penale e gestio ne amrninist

    ra

    tiva:

    riOes

    sioni a margi

    ne

    del

    caso ILVA'

    (2013)

    Diritto pcnalc contcmporanco, No. I, 44; Fabio Di Cristina ,

    'Gli stabi limenti di interesse s tralegico nazionale e i poteri del Govern o'

    (20 13)

    G

    io

    rnale di diritto ammin

    is

    trativo 369; Marco Cuniberti, '11 D.

    L.

    s

    ull

    ' ll

    va

    , tra

    conni tti d i

    at

    t

    ri

    buzione e

    du

    bbi di legi

    llimi ta

    costituzionale' (

    20

    13) Amb

    ie

    nle

    Sviluppo

    205;

    Franco Giampietro , '

    II

    va: da lla sentenza della Sovrana Corte

    11 85/2013 al D.L. . 6112013' (2013) A

    mbie

     

    le Sv

    iluppo 705; Ugo Salan it

    ro

    ,

    ll

    decreto Ilva tra tu

    te

    la della salute e salvaguardia dell'occupazione: riflessioni a

    margine de

    ll

    a sentenza de

    ll

    a Corte cos

    ti

    tuzionale'

    (20 13)

    Corr

    iere giuridico I

    041 ;

    Marisa Meli, ' Ambiente, salute, lavoro:

    il

    caso Ilva' (20 13) Nuove leggi ci

    vil

    i

    commenta te 10 17; G razia Maria Vagliasindi,

    Eot

    i collettivi e reati

    am

    bientali

    tra rcspoosabi li ta penale  c rcsponsabi litil socialc' in Bruno Monta   ari (ed.), La

    costruzione dell identita europea. Sicure

    zz

    a collettiva, liberta individuali e mode/li

    di

    regolazione

    so

    culle

    (vol. I, T

    or

    ino: Giappiche

    ll

    i, 20 12), 367.

    l l On these pro tests, see Nazareno Dinoi, 'l lva, scalta  o sequestro e arresti,

    8mila oper

    ai

    occupa  o le vie d i Taranto' Corriere del e=zogiom o (26 Ju ly 20 12)

    ava

    il

    ab le at http://

    cor ri

    eredelmezzogiorno.co

    rri

    ere.it (accessed I0 October 20 13) .

    Law Decree

    3

    Decem be r

    20 12,

    No.

    207,

    converted (with amendments) into

    Law

    24

    December 20 1

    2 No

    . 23 1.

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    10/13

      nforcemenr nerworks in aly

    449

    Law Decree3 Decembcr 20 12,

    n.

    207, as

    co

    nverted into Law 24 December

    20 12, No. 23 1, estab lishes in general that when a situation of econo

    mic

    crisis occurs

    wit

    hin a company

    of national

    strateg

    ic

    relevance with more

    than two h undred employees (and therefore there being a compelling

    need

    to

    safeg

    uard occ

    u

    pat

    io n a nd

    production

    ),

    32

    the

    Min

    iste r fo r

    the

    Environm ent, while revising the

    IPP

    C permit, may

    autho

    rise

    th

    e

    industr

    ial

    plants to continue their econom ic

    act

    ivities for 36 months , despite the

    pre

    ca

    utionary se izure o rder even tually imposed by a judge. The Law Decr

    ee

    specifica

    ll

    y establishes that the

    ll

    va industrial plan t must be co nsidered of

    strategic n

    at

    ional relevance, it puts Ilva back in possession

    of the

    seized

    goods and it authorises

    the

    prose

    cu

    tion of i ts

    pro

    ducti

    on

    activiti

    es

    .

    T hese provisio ns seemed to substa ntia lly nullify the effects of the judi

    cia l precautionary seizures.

    As a consequence of

    the

    enactmen t and conversion i

    nto

    Law of the

    pre

    vio usly ment

    ioned

    Law

    Decree

    , a conflict of powe rs challenge

    was ra

    ised

    by the proceeding

    prosecutor

    agai nst the Government

    and

    Parl iament;

    mo reover the involved Court for

    the

    re-

    examination of

    precautionary

    measures and

    the

    judge for tbe prel

    iminary

    i

    nqu

    iry challenged the consti

    tutional legitim

    acy

    of the Law Decree, as converted into Law.

    The

    Constitutio na l Cour t, ca

    ll

    ed on

    to

    decide o n bo

    th

    issues, did no t

    ad mit the challenge

    of

    conflict of powers

    33

    or the constitut ional legitimacy

    one;J.l the latter was also declared partly ungrounded . The Constitutiona l

    Court decisions considered, among o

    ther

    profiles, the

    eco

    no mic

    pr

    o

    te

    c

    tion

    aims pursued

    by

    the Government

    and

    Par

    l

    iament.

    After

    th

    e Constitu tional Court

    decis

    io ns, the same ju

    dge

    fo r the

    preliminary

    inquiry

    ordered

    the precaut iona ry seizure (final ised to the

    confiscati

    on

    order of an equiva len t value) of 8 bill ion

    euros

    (the amo

    unt

    corre

    sponding

    to the estim a ted proceeds of the crimes attributed to

    the man

    agers

    a nd

    directo

    rs of llva) belonging

    to

    a holding co

    rp

    o ration

    of the Ilva company; at

    the

    time of

    the

    seizure th e

    company

    was managed

    by the same persons

    who

    had managed Ilva at th e time o f the commission

    of

    th

    e facts

    con

    t

    ested

    in the llva case.

    This

    seizure o

    rder was

    issued

    pursuant

    to

    Legislative Decree 8

    June

    2001,

    3

    See Ugo Salanitro, dccrcto Ilva tra tutela della sa lute e sa lvaguardia

    dcll 'occupazionc: riflcssio

    ni

    a marginc dclla scntcnza dclla Cortc costituzionalc'

    20 13) Corriere giu ridico t041.

    Corte Costituzionalc. ord. 13 February 2013, No. t6; Corte Costituziona le,

    ord. 13 February 20 13, No. 17; the decisions are available a t www.pcnaleeontcm

    poranco.it (14 February 2003) (acccssed 10 October

    20

    t3).

    Cortc Costituzionalc, 9 May 2013, No. 85, ava ilable at www.pcnalccontcm

    poranco .it

    9

    May

    20

    1

    3)

    (accesscd I0 October

    20

    13

    ).

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    11/13

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    12/13

    Enforcemen ne works in Italy

    451

    institutions

    ,

    the judiciary,

    t

    he company

    and its emp loyees, t

    he

    civil society

    (in

    cluding media

    ) and

    other

    slakeholders.

    The case involves the

    enforcement

    of many

    relevant

    legal provisions, in

    a framework

    where

    t

    he enforcement

    of environmental legislation is strictly

    linked

    to

    the enforcement ofother relevant specific provisions

    (s

    uch

    as

    those

    on safety

    in

    workplaces)

    as

    well

    as

    of

    general

    substant

    ia l

    and

    procedu

    ral

    crimina

    l

    provisions.

    The case a l

    so inv

    olved the

    constitutional rules on

    dis

    tributio n

    of powe

    r a

    nd

    ,

    moreover

    , the

    same fundamenta

    l

    concep

    t

    of separa

    tion ofpowe

    rs and the role

    of the

    ju

    dic

    iary in

    the

    area

    of

    crim in

    al

    law.

    36

    More

    ove

    r, the case shows the need to adequately take

    into

    consideration

    the links

    between

    environment

    al

    protection and economic-occupational

    in terests when enact ing and

    enforcing

    (among other

    th

    ings) envi ronmen

    tal provisions,

    as

    both activities imp ly a deep reflection on

    the ba

    lance

    between

    environmental protection,

    health

    protection

    an

    d work

    safety

    protec

    t

    ion

    ,

    as

    well

    as

    a

    stud

    y

    on

    the

    balance

    between

    the above-mentioned

    facto rs and

    economic

    activities and competiti

    on

    .

    Clearly,

    dealing

    with such a complex, multilevel and

    articu

    lated case

    w

    ou

    ld require a high level

    of

    cooperation

    and

    inf

    orma

    l networking

    among

    a ll the interested part ies.

    Looking

    at

    the facts, some significant gaps in networking have occurred,

    reaching the level of a

    connict

    of powers challenge, probably

    as

    a conse

    quence

    of

    (am

    ong othe

    r issues) the above-mentioned different

    approaches

    to the issue of envir

    onme

    ntal compliance.

    These gaps in networking contributed to generating relevant conse

    quences: the increased time needed

    to

    solve the connict; the emergency

    (and indeed not thought through

    enough)

    intr

    oduction of provisions

    which potentia lly apply

    to

    future similar

    crit

    i al situations; the adoption

    of

    judicial decisions which, with the aims of overcoming the legislative

    intervention

    and

    the Constitutional

    Court

    decisions, might be interpreted

    as partia

    ll

    y f

    orc

    ing

    if

    not the letter at least the rat ionale

    of

    some normative

    provisions,

    as

    well

    as

    violating some fundamenta l principles of punitive

    Jaw. All these elements do not seem

    to

    produce positive effects on the

    ultimate goal

    of

    the protection

    of

    the environment

    and

    of the other related

    interests,

    as

    well as.

    in

    a

    more

    general perspective, on the fundamenta l

    principles

    of

    crimina l Jaw

    and

    on the same concept

    of

    separation

    of

    powers.

    ' On the latter proliles. sec for instance Domenieo Pulitano. 'Fra gi ustizia

    penale e gestione amministrativa: rinession i a margine del

    caso

    ILVA  (2013)

    Oiritto penale contemporaneo ,

    No.

    I, 44; Francesco Vigano, In questo numero'

    (2013)

    Diritto

    penale con temporaneo,

    No.

    I, I .

  • 8/20/2019 The Ilva Case

    13/13

    452 nvironmemal enforcement net  r  s

    5. CONCLU

      I

    NG REMARKS

    The analysis

    co

    nduct

    ed

    so far demonstrates tha t, despite a

    certa

    in

    in

    dif

    ference towards

    environmenta

    l cri

    minal

    provisions

    en

    f

    or

    c

    emen

    t net

    works

    from a

    co

    n

    cept

    ual a nd

    theor

    etical perspective, in Italy th ere do exist

    relevant examples o f effectiveness

    in

    net

    wo

    rking formal and info rm al, at

    the

    public level, at

    the

    civil society level

    an

    d at a mixed p ublic-civil society

    level) for the enforcement o f enviro nmenta l criminal

    prov

    isio ns.

    Al

    so

    , the concep tual importance and practical benefits of netwo rks in

    the

    specific

    fie

    ld o f the fight agai

    nst

    organised

    env

    ir

    onmental

    crime was

    demonstr

    ated .

    The stru ct

    ur

    e, tasks a nd achievement of these netwo rk s depose in the

    sense that

    the

    latter are potent  ally effective

    models

    o f enviro

    nm

    enta l

    enforcement networks.

    Nevertheless, these pos iti

    ve

    examples sti

    ll

    coexist with

    so

    me relevant

    gaps to be

    fi ll

    ed when it

    co

    mes to substant ial

    co

    mp lia nce, as we

    ll

    as to

    cooperat

    ion between powers and authorities wh ich are involved in envi

    ronmenta.l enforcemen t T hese pro files migh t con tribu te to creating cha

    l-

    lenges to environ mental

    co

    mpliance and enforcement , th er

    efore

    negatively

    affecting

    the environmental protection goals ac hievement

    and

    rela ted

    relevan t economic interests and resulting in a substantial breach of the

    sa me

    funda

    menta l

    pr

    inciple

    of

    sustainable deve lop

    me

    nt

    as

    we

    ll

    as of

    the

    relevan t fundamen tal principles of criminal law.

    Th is co nclusion ca

    ll

    s for t he need to foster informa l network ing between

    pub lic au

    tho

    rities

    as

    well

    as

    between public authorities and

    co

    r

    pora

    t

    ions

    a nd stakeho lde rs fo r environmental compliance a nd enfo rcement.

    Moreover, th e need to adequa tely take into consideration the links

    between envi ro nmental protection a nd econom ic-occupational interests

    sh

    ou

    ld not be neglected in the future devel

    opment

    of environmenta l leg

    islation and the related

    fo

    rma l and info rmal complia nce and enforcement

    networks.

    Th is seems necessary

    to

    make f

    ur

    ther progress in ens

    ur

    ing a more

    effec

    ti

    ve a

    pp

    lica tion

    of

    en

    vi

    ro

    nm

    enta l legisla t

    io

    n, also

    thr

    ough

    a n

    etwo

    rk

    cu lture which can contribute to reaching a greater consistency of approach

    in the implement

    at

    io n, application and enforcem

    ent

    of environmenta l

    legislatio n.