the ideology of environmental regionalism: the challenge of the alpine convention and the...
DESCRIPTION
The Ideology of Environmental Regionalism: the Challenge of the Alpine Convention and the "Strange Case" of the Andean Community. Presented by Jon Marco Church (Perth Conference, Scotland, Session 3.7)TRANSCRIPT
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
1
THE ALPINE CONVENTION AND THE ANDEAN COMMUNITY
ALTERNATIVE MODELS FOR MOUNTAIN REGIONALISM?
September 18, 2010 Perth
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
2
OUTLINE
1. Environmental regionalism • History • Definitions • Criticisms
2. Mountain cases • Ecologic factors • Socio-economic factors • Political aspects
3. Some conclusions
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
3
QUESTIONS - Is the Alpine (and Carpathian) Convention the only model for regional mountain agreements? - Can the Andean Community be considered as an alternative model? - What do they have in common? How do they differ from each other? - What do they tell us about environmental regionalism?
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
4
HISTORY - International organization starts with rivers in the 19th
century - “New Deal” regional environmental initiatives in the 1930s - UNEP regional seas conventions since the 1970s - Regional mountain agreements since the 1990s
…a “modest enterprise” (Foster & Meyer 2000)
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
5
TREND
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
19
48
19
50
19
52
19
54
19
56
19
58
19
60
19
62
19
64
19
66
19
68
19
70
19
72
19
74
19
76
19
78
19
80
19
82
19
84
19
86
19
88
19
90
19
92
19
94
19
96
19
98
20
00
20
02
rivers lakes seas mountains
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
6
DEFINITIONS - “Natural” borders, security (Foucher 1991) - Geographic landmarks, ecosystems - Ecology, geography, political science, international relations - Frustration with “scientific” attempts to delineate regions
(Hurrell 1995) - Example: the definition of the scope of application of the
Carpathian Convention (Fall & Egerer 2004)
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
7
CRITICISMS - Nothing new - Naïve belief in virtuous practices of ecoregional identities
(Debarbieux 2009) - Historically reductionist (Frenkel 1994)
…“geographic reductionism”? …persisting tension between social-historical and
environmental-geographical factors and perspectives
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
8
ALPINE CONVENTION
Members Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Liechtenstein, Monaco, Slovenia, Switzerland, EU
Objective Integrated protection of the environment
Year 1991 Protocols 9 Secretariat Innsbruck-Bolzano
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
9
CARPATHIAN CONVENTION
Members Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Ukraine
Objective Protection and sustainable development
Year 2003 Protocols 1 Secretariat Vienna (UNEP)
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
10
ANDEAN COMMUNITY
Members Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru (former: Chile, Venezuela)
Objective Integrated development
Year 1969 Decisions 737 (June 2010) Organs Secretariat, Parliament, Councils, Tribunal, Bank, University
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
11
ECOLOGIC AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Alpine Convention Andean Community
- Compact, ecologically uniform - Long, “megadiverse”
- It includes the whole arc - It does not cover the whole range
- Dominant sectors: nature, tourism, transport
- Dominant sectors: mining, water
- Emerging issues: climate, water - Emerging issue: transport (IIRSA)
- Demographics: national and subnational variations
- Demographically more uniform (rural exodus, indigenous question)
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
12
POLITICAL ASPECTS
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Alpine Convention Andean Community
- Typical regional environmental agreement
- Standard regional integration organization
- Product of the capitals - Also product of the capitals
- Leading ENGO: CIPRA (official observer)
- Leading ENGO: CONDESAN (no official observers)
- Official languages: 4 - Common language (Spanish)
- Dominant role of the rotating presidency
- Prominent role of the secretariat
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
13
POLITICAL ASPECTS (CONTINUED)
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Alpine Convention Andean Community
- Balance of “institutional capacity”, decentralization
- Traditional balance of power (military, economic)
- Limited funding (€0.8 million, personnel: 10), autonomous EU program (€26 million)
- Core funding ($5 million, personnel: 100), development bank (capital: $10 billion)
-Compare: CIPRA incomes (€1.5 million)
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
14
ANDEAN COMMUNITY (MORE)
- Recent democratic transitions, ideological divisions (ALBA, FTAs)
- Recent armed conflict, traditional alliances (Peru-Ecuador 1995-98)
- High levels of institutionalization, including an Andean Parliament and Court, binding nature of decisions
- Focus on social and economic issues, growing awareness on environmental concerns (Andean Environmental Agenda)
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
15
WORKING PAPER
ENVIRONMENTAL REGIONALISM THE CHALLENGE OF THE ALPINE CONVENTION AND THE “STRANGE CASE” OF THE ANDEAN COMMUNITY
Harvard University Kennedy School of Government Center for International Development Sustainability Science Program
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
16
CONCLUSIONS
- Existing regional mountain agreements can be studied as international organizations
- The Alpine Convention is more mountain specific, but it is institutionally weak
- If it further developed its environmental agenda, the Andean Community has the potential of becoming the strongest regional international organization for mountains
- The Andean Community can be considered as an alternative model for new regional mountain agreements in the Balkans, Caucasus, Himalaya, etc.
Questions History Definitions Criticisms Ecologic Socio-economic Political Conclusions
Jon Marco Church [email protected] Center for International Development www.cid.harvard.edu Harvard Kennedy School
[email protected] Centre de recherches politiques de la Sorbonne crps.univ-paris1.fr Université Paris 1
17
alps
© danila obici 2009
THANK YOU