the icao global air navigation plan and its...

27 March 2017 ICAO European and North Atlantic Office

The ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan and its implementation

ICAO EUR/NAT Office and ACACGlobal Air Navigation Plan (GANP) and Aviation System

Block Upgrade (ASBU) Symposium 2017

(ICAO EUR NAT Office / ACAC, Tunis, Tunisia, 27 - 30 March 2017)

27 March 2017

Challenges

HIGHEST TRAFFIC GROWTH IN ASIA

NO REGIONAL ACCIDENT RATE EXCEEDING TWICE THE GLOBAL AVERAGE

27 March 2017

• A global ATM system is envisioned as the foundation of a worldwide integrated, harmonised and interoperable air transportation system. This system is intended to integrate regional and local ATM systems as well as to interoperate and provide seamless services (across all regions, sub-regions and States) to all users in all phases of flight.

• A globally interoperable system will meet requirements for safety and security and provide optimum economic operations that are environmentally sustainable and cost effective.

• The ICAO vision of global harmonisation is therefore based on the need for:– Uniform level of safety across all regions, sub-regions and States– Optimised traffic flows across all regions, sub-regions and States– Physical system-to-system connectedness, sharing pertinent data across systems and regions– Common performance requirements, standards and operating procedures– Common aeronautical information exchange– Meeting environmental objectives– Meeting minimum and common security objectives

ICAO vision on global harmonisation

27 March 2017

• Endorsement of the global ATM operational concept already at 11th Air Navigation Conference in 2003

• ICAO is requested to:– develop ATM system requirements– address interoperability and seamlessness– define requirements for global AIM– publish the operational concept– amend the Global Plan– develop a performance framework

Air Navigation Conference 11How did we start

27 March 2017

• That States and PIRGs consider the Global Air Navigation Plan for CNS/ATM Systems as a catalyst for change, providing a global safety and interoperability framework while allowing regional or local adaptation to efficiently meet regional and local needs

• That States and PIRGs agree on a set of metrics related to key performance areas, incorporate these metrics into the performance monitoring process and review their results on a regular basis (EANPG, RASG)

Air Navigation Conference 11The role of States and PIRGs

27 March 2017

Air Navigation Conference 11Transition Strategy

Evolution – Phase 1 Evolution –Phase 3Evolution – Phase 2

NEAR-TERM MEDIUM-TERM LONG-TERM

Based on what we HAVEtoday Involves application of

available procedures, processes and capabilities Identifies potential “gap”

requirements that focusnear term work program activities

Based on what weKNOW today Involves application of

emerging procedures, processes and capabilities Identifies “gap”

requirements and drives future R&D

Based on CONCEPTexpectations Involves application of

new procedures, processes and capabilities Fills “gap”

requirements and sustains continuous improvement R&D

Overlap Period

The “Overlap Period” indicates that there is no set date by which the objectives of eachtransition should be met – other than within a time band of perhaps 2-3 years. It alsorecognizes that some States or Regions may not have a specific performancerequirement that would need the application of changes identified in the transitionmaps at the same time as another State or Region.

Overlap Period

27 March 2017

• Assembly Resolution A35-15– Calls upon States, regional planning groups and the aviation

industry to use the ICAO Global ATM Operational Concept as the common framework to guide planning and implementation of CNS/ATM systems and to focus all such development work on the operational concept

Air Navigation Conference 11Follow up in the ICAO Assembly

27 March 2017

Air Navigation Conference 11Development of GPIs

27 March 2017

Global, regional, national plans

27 March 2017

Global Air Navigation Plan

• Strategic Document for regional and national planning for air navigation infrastructure

• Serves as global guidance for PIRGs• Maturity process

– First developed as global coordinated plan for CNS/ATM Systems in 1992

– In 1998 the Global Plan for CNS/ATM systems released– In 2006, the Global Plan for Air Navigation Systems was

developed– In 2012, revised Global Plan was presented during 12 ANConf

that introduced the ASBU methodology• Refers to five major disciplines

– ATM, CNS, MET, AIM and AGA

27 March 2017

Evolution of the Plan

27 March 2017

• The Conference unanimously endorsed the Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBUs) framework introduced by ICAO to set goals in terms of operational improvements on a consensus-driven basis.

• The Conference also endorsed the draft 4th edition of the Global Air Navigation Plan (Doc 9750), as unified planning mechanism, which was presented for approval at the 38th ICAO Assembly in September 2013

• ICAO is tasked to include the key policy principles in the GANP, develop financial policies, SARPS development plan, define a stable and efficient process to update the GANP

• ICAO (through Regional Offices) will provide guidance and assistance on ASBUs implementation to States, establish a group and mechanism for inter-regional cooperation

Air Navigation Conference 12How do we continue

27 March 2017

• The Global Air Navigation Plan’s aviation system Block Upgrade methodology is a programmatic and flexible global systems engineering approach that allows all Member States to advance their air navigation capacities based on their specific operational requirements.

• The Block Upgrades will enable aviation to realize the global harmonization, increased capacity, and improved environmental efficiency that modern air traffic growth now demands in every region around the world.

• The GANP’s Block Upgrade planning approach also addresses user needs, regulatory requirements and the needs of air navigation service providers and airports.

• The Global Air Navigation Plan: obliges States to map their individual or regional programmes against the harmonized

GANP, but provides them with far greater certainty of investment. requires active collaboration among States through the PIRGs in order to coordinate

initiatives within applicable regional Air Navigation Plans. provides required tools for States and regions to develop comprehensive business case

analyses as they seek to realize their specific operational improvements.

Air Navigation Conference 12How do we continue

27 March 2017

Air Navigation Conference 12Global Air Navigation Plan

Global Air Navigation PlanOutline

EXCUTIVE VIEWChapter 1: Global Air Navigation Policy Chapter 2: Near Term Standardization – ASBU Block 0 and 1Chapter 3: Continuing Strategic Planning – ASBU Blocks 2 and 3Chapter 4. Implementation-Turning ideas into action Chapter 5: Aviation System Performance: Analysis and Reporting

Appendices: 1. GANP Ownership, Overview and Evolution; 2. Hyperlinked Online Support Documentation; 3. Technology Roadmaps; and4. SARPs Development Planning.

27 March 2017

Air Navigation Conference 12Global Air Navigation Plan

27 March 2017

ICAO Doc 9750Main differences in the new version

No Previous Version (Nov 2006) New Version (Nov 2013)1 Scope covers only ground equipment for ANSPs Scope extends to airspace users and regulators involving

users and CAAs

2 P (paper)–based E (electronic)–based

3 Does not support planning tools for its implementation Detailed guidance available online on the related website

4 Addresses individual improvements through GPIs Addresses a package of improvements through ASBU Modules encompassing all GPIs

5 No individual roadmap for enablers Separate technology roadmaps for C, N, S and IM

6 Aircraft equipage not specified Avionics roadmap included

7 Global plan was not presented to Industry forum Global Plan reviewed by GANIS

8 Implementation was based on near term and medium terms

Implementation is based on near, medium and long terms through Blocks 0, 1, 2 and 3 timeframes

9 Supported by paper based Regional ANPs Supported by web based Regional ANPs, called eANPs

10 Quantification of fuel savings and corresponding environmental benefits are not available

ICAO Fuel Savings Estimation Tool (IFSET) will be a part of the revised global plan

27 March 2017

ICAO Doc 9750New planning flow chart

End: Validate and monitor


Start: review user needs (capacity, delays, routes,…)

Identify homogenous areas/traffic flows/terminal

areas/aerodromes

List States/FIRs

Consider current/foreseen traffic population

Consider forecasts of average&peak aircraft traffic

Survey Aerodrome characteristics, ATM

Infrastructure including Human Resource availability

Consider civil/military access and SUA requirements

Assess costs & revenue parameters

Review National Plans requirements

Set Performance Objectives

Elaborate/refine scenarios

Perform/integrate initial CBA/ sensitivity analysis

Evaluate acceptance by users

Estimate human resources requirements

Estimate new economic parameters

Develop implementation mechanisms

Develop consensus with users

Amend Regional Plans

Develop human resources plan

Perform implementation tasks


ASBUs

Manage Assess Elaborate Estimate Implement

Review

IDENTIFY GAPS

Performance Metrics

Air Navigation Reports

27 March 2017

GANP and GASP Advantages

• A globally harmonized and time-wise synchronized set of ATM improvements to direct the work of States, ANSPS, AOs, airports, ICAO and other international and standard making organizations

• A globally agreed ATM baseline through commitment to implement Block 0

• A systematic approach to ATM improvements, a packaged solution that includes standards/guidance, technology, procedures, regulatory framework, business case, performance measurements

27 March 2017

More Advantages

• Regulators will now be part of regional and national air navigation planning process by supporting required regulatory needs for ASBU modules

• Regional agreement for the implementation of ASBUs will be reflected in the respective regional air navigation plans through PIRG process

• National planning will also follow ASBU methodology thus deriving all benefits for all the entities

• The FASID part of the regional plans is now needed to reflect ground systems as well as avionics to implement the respective ASBU modules. This process ensures commitment by all States, Users and ANS providers for the implementation work programme.

27 March 2017

ICAO 38th Assembly

• ICAO's 191 Member States and a large number of international organizations were invited to the Assembly, which established the worldwide policy of the Organization for the upcoming triennium 2014-2016

• During Assembly Sessions, ICAO’s complete work programme in the technical, economic, legal and technical cooperation fields had been reviewed in detail

• Assembly endorsed key items in November 2013:– Endorsement of the Global Aviation Safety Plan

– Endorsement of the Global Air Navigation Plan (ASBUs)

– Endorsement of ICAOs 5 Strategic Objectives• Safety• Air Navigation Capacity and Efficiency• Security and Facilitation• Economic Development of Air Transport• Environmental Protection

27 March 2017

ICAO 38th Assembly

In October 2013, the 38th Session of the ICAO Assembly adopted Resolution A38-2 on ICAO global planning for safety and air navigation which specifies the roles/responsibilities of States and aviation stakeholders such as:

- Endorses the first edition of the Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) and the fourth edition of the Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP) as the global strategic directions for safety and air navigation, respectively;- Resolves that these global plans shall be implemented and kept current in close cooperation and coordination with all concerned stakeholders;- Resolves that these global plans shall provide the frameworks in which regional, sub-regional and national implementation plans will be developed and implemented, thus ensuring harmonization and coordination of efforts aimed at improving international civil aviation safety, capacity and efficiency;- Urges Member States to develop sustainable solutions to fully exercise their safety oversight and air navigation responsibilities which can be achieved by sharing resources, utilizing internal and/or external resources, such as regional and sub-regional organizations and the expertise of other States;- Calls upon States and invites other stakeholders to cooperate in the development and implementation of regional, sub-regional and national plans based on the frameworks of the GASP and GANP

27 March 2017

ICAO’s Role in ATM Modernization

“Increase the capacity and improve the efficiency of the global civil aviation system”

• Through the GANP, offer a long-term vision to assist all aviation stakeholders, and ensure continuityand harmonization among modernization programmes

• Through the Aviation System Block Upgrades (ASBU), provide a consensus-driven modernization strategy for integrated planning

27 March 2017

GANP Objectives and Priorities

PRIORITIESPERFORMANCE BASED NAVIGATION (PBN)

CONTINUOUS DESCENT AND CLIMB OPERATIONS (CDO/CCO)COLLABORATIVE DECISION-MAKING (CDM & A-CDM) & ATFM

27 March 2017

Global & Regional

Global Plans

SARPs & PANS

Training & Guidance

Implementation Planning/Supp.

Measurement & Reporting

if needed

Compliance & Verification

Needs Analysis / Validation

GANP Implementation

http://www.icao.int/meetings/advancedATM/

http://www.icao.int/meetings/mpl/

27 March 2017

Integrated Implementation Planning

• impact assessments considering implementation requirements and roll-out plan for new SARPs prior to adoption, as applicable;

• Annex amendments on a two-year cycle and an associated realistic schedule for notification, adoption and applicability of the new SARPs;

• availability of implementation assistance prior to applicability;• a communication strategy, plan and methods to raise awareness of

new SARPs;• A coordinated programme for assistance to States between ANB,

Regional Offices, TCB, and regional organizations and groups;• enhanced monitoring of implementation to identify and prioritize

targeted assistance; and• more timely updating of USOAP protocol questions.

Actions for improved implementation

27 March 2017

Annex 6 Annex 8Annex 1

SARPs & PANS

Computer-Based Training

Seminars and Symposia

“What”

Global Plans

DOC 9946DOC 9735

Guidance Material

Annex and PANS Amendments to States

Training and guidance are often not synchronized with amendments

Traditional Implementation Methods

27 March 2017

Integrated Planning for Implementation (improved methods)


Seminars and Symposia

DOC 9946DOC 9735

Guidance Material

Annex 6 Annex 8Annex 1

SARPs & PANS


Seminars, workshops and

Symposia

Guidance material

Implementation Planning

“When”

Assess & Measure

USOAP Protocol Questions(if needed)

Compliance & Verification

“What”

Global Plans

Using the point of view of the implementer

Provision of a singular package for implementation

27 March 2017

• Priorities – “What is most important?” – based on Global Plans

• Indicators– “What are you measuring?”

• Metrics – “How are you measuring it?”

• Targets – “When and at what level would you like to achieve it?”

Implementation metrics

27 March 2017

Example PBN

PBN Implementation Programme– Led by ICAO with 9 Partners

– Multi-disciplinary and collaborative approach

Achievements in 2012-2013– PBN GO Teams Phase I in 9 locations covering all regions,

involving more than 300 PBN experts worldwide• Focused on raising a champion State

– Establishment of the FPP/RSO in Beijing– Launched the 1st iKIT during the PBN Symposium (2012)– 4th Edition of the PBN Manual, OPS Approval Manual, and CCO Manual delivered– First set of computer-based training modules delivered

Achievements in 2014– Establishment of the PBN AFPP Office in Dakar– Finalization of PBN GO Teams phase II

• Educating regions by means of regional implementation example

– Updated Flight procedures and Separation minima to support PBN– PBN Endorsements and PBN revenue generating programme established

27 March 2017

GANP and PIRGs

• The implementation of GANP modules, taking into account the Regional Priorities, is a key task of the ICAO Planning and Implementation Regional Groups (PIRGs).

• The PIRG process will further ensure that all required supporting procedures, regulatory approvals and training capabilities are set in place.

• These supporting requirements will be reflected in regional online Air Navigation Plans (eANPs) developed by the PIRGs, ensuring strategic transparency, coordinated progress and certainty of investment.

• Enhanced planning perspectives and a global framework for performance measurement is required to further support the ASBU implementation activities

EANPG / NATSPG

27 March 2017

Establish Regional Priorities, ASBU Modules & Targets

Regional Performance

Indicators

Annual ANC/Council Review

Revised PIRG TORs & Work Programme

Annual PIRG Meeting Reports

Revised GANP

Annual Global Air Navigation

Report

Revise Regional Air Navigation

Implementation Plan

Revise Regional Air Navigation Plan (ANP)

In progress

31

Regional implementation

27 March 2017

GANP evolution

• GADSS-SAR Thread• Minimum Path• Baseline• Performance Objectives

Visionary and Conceptual Approach

Technology Roadmap Structuration

Global Standardisation Roadmap

ICAO Air Navigation Work Programme

27 March 2017

GANP Appendix 5 (Roadmaps)

Roadmap on expected evolution of Navigation infrastructure

27 March 2017

GANP and ICAO Panel work

• ICAO Panel development

• Timelines and Interdependencies

ICAO EUR/NAT Office 3426 May 2016

27 March 2017

ATM logical infrastructure vision


27 March 2017

The GANP at the 39th Assembly

ICAO EUR/NAT Office26 May 2016

“Increase the capacity and improve the efficiency of the global civil aviation system”

• Objectives– International and overarching framework of a global

investment plan: make it more usable towards implementation– Keep it stable while making the necessary updates/additions– Adjust the periodicity to the Assembly and ICAO editing cycles

• A Planning Document for Implementation– GANP should be comprehensive planning tool to support the

development and implementation of a harmonized global air navigation system

– Promotion / Education on major changes (Capabilities AIR/GND, Roles AOs/ANSP, ATM System Infrastructure/Global Services, Competency Framework)

36

27 March 2017

ICAO 39th Assembly


• The 5th version of the 2016–2030 Global Air Navigation Plan:

• Obliges States to map their national or regional programmes against the harmonized GANP, but provides them with far greater certainty of investment.

• Requires active collaboration among States through the PIRGs in order to coordinate initiatives within applicable regional Air Navigation Plans.

• Provides required tools for States and regions to develop comprehensive business case analyses as they seek to realize their specific operational improvements.

• Provides a vision of the evolution of the Global ATM system and the potential requirements to industry, for better anticipation in its products.

27 March 2017

ICAO 39th Assembly In October 2016, the 39th Session of the ICAO Assembly adopted Resolution

A39-12 on ICAO global planning for safety and air navigation which further clarifies the roles/responsibilities of States and aviation stakeholders:

- endorses the second edition of the Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP) and the fifth edition of the Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP) as the global strategic directions for safety and air navigation, respectively;- resolves that these global plans shall be implemented and kept current in close cooperation and coordination with all concerned stakeholders;- resolves that these global plans shall provide the frameworks in which regional, sub-regional and national implementation plans will be developed and implemented, thus ensuring consistency, harmonization and coordination of efforts aimed at improving international civil aviation safety, capacity and efficiency;- calls upon States, planning and implementation regional groups (PIRGs), and the aviation industry to utilize the guidance provided in the GANP for planning and implementationactivities which establish priorities, targets and indicators consistent with globally-harmonized objectives, taking into account operational needs- calls upon States, PIRGs, and the aviation industry to provide timely information to ICAO, and to each other, regarding the implementation status of the GANP, including the lessons learned from the implementation of its provisions

27 March 2017

Regional Safety &AN Priorities & Targets

• Regional dashboards (Priorities, indicators, metrics, targets)• Safety example

– Priority – Runway safety – Indicator – Reduction of runway related fatal accidents– Metric – Number of runway related fatal accidents per million departures– Target – annual 50% reduction

• AN example– Priority – PBN Implementation– Indicator – Implementation of PBN runway approach procedures– Metric – Number of instrument runway thresholds at international

aerodromes with APV– Target – 70% implementation by end of 2014, 100% by end of 2016

27 March 2017

• Measuring against the Global Plans through regional indicators– Now Available:

www.icao.int/safety/pages/regional-targets.aspx

– Shows the progress against regionally-agreed indicators, ASBU modules and targets

– Shows the implementation status and performance by regional grouping - by UN Region, ICAO accreditation, PIRG, RASG, COSCAP, RSOO, etc.

– Ability to drill-down on each indicator to see specific details on metric and data used

Regional Dashboards

http://www.icao.int/safety/pages/regional-targets.aspx

27 March 2017

Dynamic Query Selection

Able to filter results by:

• Any region (UN, ICAO Accreditation, PIRG, RASG, COSCAP, RSOO, etc.)

• Any agreement(with defined indicators and targets)

Implementation Highlight

For Safety:Effective Implementation USOAP Targets

For Air Navigation:PBN ImplementationASBU Environmental Benefits

Regional Performance by Strategic Objective

Global and Region-specific Metrics and Targets

Regional Dashboards

27 March 2017

Regional ASBU implementation report

• Regional Priorities from EANPG/55, revised at EANPG/58 for the inclusion of B0-CCO and B0-AMET

• Reporting is linked to existing mechanisms (ESSIP/LSSIP) and enhanced (ATMGE) questionnaires to avoid double reporting from stakeholders

• National workshops in for submission of their questionnaires into the 2016 reference period

• Obligation for States to report the status of their ASBU implementation will continue (annualEANPG endorsement)

• Harmonised reporting metrics• Report will be part of eANP Vol III and also be

part of the ICAO Global Air Navigation Report

27 March 2017

• A wider (more regional, if not even global vision) perspective is needed to make even greater gains in capacity and efficiency

• A far-reaching cooperation is necessary in order to support the implementation of facilities and services over larger geographical areas

• Enhanced planning perspectives and a global framework for performance measurement is required to support the implementation activities

• States and all aviation stakeholders should– work together towards a common vision (global ATM Operational Concept)– use a common planning framework

• Global Air Navigation Plan (GANP), the regional air navigation plans and several other documents and tools (e.g. European ATM Masterplan)

• Global Aviation Safety Plan (GASP)– utilize harmonised performance objectives (targets, metrics, indicators)

• Interoperability and harmonization are key factors in order to ensure the required improvements for the future

Adressing the challenges

27 March 2017

Thank You

the icao global air navigation plan and its...

Documents