the human solution to the problem of death · morris, goldenberg, & heflick, in prep 4.64 -2.46...

37
The Human Solution to the Problem of Death Become more than a mere animal, destined to die and decay Our ancestors invented a world that transcend the body, that never ends We are souls, spirits, minds our bodies are mere containers for our “real essence” Greater spiritual powers that control our eternal destiny: Gods, deities, omnipotent spiritual beings Gives us hope of literal immortality We emphasize our minds and spirits and distance ourselves from our bodies

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • The Human Solution to the Problem of Death

    • Become more than a mere animal, destined to die and decay

    • Our ancestors invented a world that transcend the body, that never ends

    • We are souls, spirits, minds – our bodies are mere containers for our “real essence”

    • Greater spiritual powers that control our eternal destiny: Gods, deities, omnipotent spiritual beings

    • Gives us hope of literal immortality

    • We emphasize our minds and spirits and distance ourselves from our bodies

  • “Why did man not go insane in the face of an existential contradiction between a symbolic self, that seems to give man an infinite worth in a timeless scheme of things, and a body that is worth about 98 cents?”

    Erich Fromm (1955)

    A Body of Terror

  • The Body Problem

    • Bodies are frightening

    • Blood, mucous, saliva, urine, feces, bones, organs -- we are physical creatures

    • Bodies also become sick, age, lose their functioning

    • Bodies DIE!!!

    • So we MUST be more than our bodies

  • Negative Emotional Reactions to Our Bodies

    • Remind us of our creaturely, animalistic, physical nature

    • Which reminds us that, like all other animals, we die

  • 5.82 5.76

    6.73

    5

    5.5

    6

    6.5

    7

    Control Death/Immediate Death/Delay

    Dis

    gust

    Sen

    siti

    vity

    Goldenberg, Pyszczynski, Greenberg, Solomon, Kluck, & Cornwell, 2001

    Body Disgust

  • 1.19

    1.67

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    Neutral Body Products

    Dea

    th A

    cces

    sib

    ility

    Cox, Goldenberg, Pyszczynski, & Weise, 2007

    Body Disgust

  • What Happens when People are Reminded of their Creaturliness?

    • Distancing self from their bodies

    • Emphasize mental, spiritual, romantic aspects of self – how we are DIFFERENT from animals

    • Find bodily experiences more disturbing

  • Creatureliness: “the boundary between humans and

    animals is not as great as most

    people think … our bodies work

    in pretty much the same way as

    the bodies of all other animals

    … whether you're talking about

    lizards, cows, horses, insects,

    or humans, we're all made up of

    the same basic biological

    products…”

    Creatureliness Prime:

    Uniqueness: “although we humans have some things in

    common with other animals,

    human beings are truly unique

    … the potential of the human

    mind and spirit go far beyond

    anything remotely similar to

    what is found in simple animals

    … humans have language and

    culture … we create works of

    art, music, and literature …”

  • • Women read essay about humans are similar to or different from animals, or neutral control

    • Watch video teaching how to do breast self-examination for tumors

    • Asked to do breast self-examination

    • Measure how much time they spend on breast self-examination

  • Goldenberg, Arndt, Hart, & Routledge, 2008

    Creatureliness and Breast Exams

    58.6257.5

    38.74

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    55

    60

    65

    No Essay Human Uniqueness Human Creatureliness

    Se

    co

    nd

    s

  • 4.13

    4.68

    4.78

    3.77

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    5

    Uniqueness Creatureliness

    Ap

    pea

    l of

    Ph

    ysic

    al S

    ex

    Exam

    Death

    Goldenberg, Cox, Pyszczynski, Greenberg, & Solomon, 2002

    Creatureliness and Sex

  • Why is Sex Such a Problem?

    • Do you remember the first time you learned about sex?

    • Why do ALL cultures have taboos and rituals surrounding sex? Why do all cultures restrict sex?

    • Some cultures very restrictive; some cultures very permissive

    • Most theories simply blame it on society --- but the real question is WHY?

  • Sex is a Reminder of our Physical, Animalistic, Creaturely Nature

    • Sex is of the body … and the body is of death

    • Sex is troubling becomes it indirectly reminds us of death

    • Transform sex into something more than a mere animalistic act:

    – Love

    – Spiritual enlightenment

    – Sexual athlete or hero

  • • Participants read essay about how human beings are either similar to or different from other animals

    • Answer several short open-ended questions about either the physical or romantic aspects of sex

    • Measure death thought accessibility (DTA) with word completion task

    • D_ _ D; COFF_ _

  • 1.47

    1.13

    1.26

    1.59

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    Uniqueness Creatureliness

    Dea

    th A

    cces

    sib

    ility

    Romantic Sex

    Physical Sex

    Goldenberg, Cox, Pyszczynski, Greenberg, & Solomon, 2002

    Creatureliness and Sex

  • • Participants high or low in self-esteem

    • Mortality salience or dental pain conditions

    • Measure the appeal of the physical and romantic aspects of sex

  • 4.06

    5.28

    4.374.50

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    5

    5.5

    Low High

    Body-Esteem

    Ap

    pe

    al o

    f P

    hy

    sic

    al S

    ex

    Death

    TV

    Appeal of Physical Sex as a Function of Mortality Salience and Body Self-Esteem

  • Reproduction:

    Females ≠ Males

    The female “is more enslaved to the species than the male, her animality is more manifest” (de Beauvoir, 1953)

    Women’s Bodies

  • Reactions to Pregnancy

  • Goldenberg, Cox, Arndt, & Goplen, 2007

    3.04

    2.80 2.87

    3.93

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    Demi Not Pregnant Demi Pregnant

    Dis

    app

    rova

    l

    Uniqueness

    Creatureliness

    Reactions to Pregnancy

  • Reactions to Pregnancy

  • Goldenberg, Cox, Arndt, & Goplen, 2007

    4.97 4.92

    5.31

    4.14

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Gwyneth Not Pregnant Gwyneth Pregnant

    Per

    ceiv

    ed C

    om

    pet

    ence

    Uniqueness

    Creatureliness

    Reactions to Pregnancy

  • Reactions to Breastfeeding

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 2.97

    4.27

    2.73

    5.3

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    No Breastfeeding Breastfeeding

    Dis

    app

    rova

    l fo

    r M

    agaz

    ine

    Co

    ver

    Control

    Creatureliness

    Cox, Goldenberg, Arndt, & Pyszczynski, 2007

    Reactions to Breastfeeding

  • Reactions to a Woman Breast-feeding in Room Next Door

    • “Other participant” brings baby to study

    • Goes into next room to feed baby, with breast or bottle

    • Afterward she comes out for study

    • Participants told to get a chair and sit next to her to talk

    • Measure physical distancing from mother, in inches

  • 33.19

    31.44

    32.58

    38.06

    25

    30

    35

    40

    Bottle feeding Breastfeeding

    Inch

    es b

    etw

    een

    Ch

    airs

    Dental Pain

    Death

    Cox, Goldenberg, Arndt, & Pyszczynski, 2007

    Reactions to Breastfeeding

  • 1.55

    1.42 1.42

    2.25

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    Bottle feeding Breastfeeding

    Cre

    atu

    relin

    ess

    Acc

    essi

    bili

    ty

    Dental Pain

    Death

    Cox, Goldenberg, Arndt, & Pyszczynski, 2007

    Reactions to Breastfeeding

  • Men’s Attraction to Women

  • Landau, Goldenberg, Greenberg, Gillath, Solomon, Cox, Martens, & Pyszczynski, 2006

    Men’s Attraction to Women

    4.3

    5.1

    3.92

    2.95

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Wholesome Seductive

    Att

    ract

    ion

    Dental Pain

    Death

  • “In woman dressed and adorned, nature is present but under restraint” (de Beauvoir, 1952)

    Beauty as a Solution

  • Women Compared to Men: • Value appearance over competence (e.g., Fredrickson et al., 1998) • Have memories from observer’s perspective (Huebner & Fredrickson, 1999) • Are less aware of physiological states (Roberts & Pennebaker, 1995)

    When women’s appearance is primed: • Restrain eating (e.g., Fredrickson et al., 1998) • Perform poorly on a cognitive tasks (e.g., Gervais et al., 2011) • Talk less (Saguy et al., 2010)

    Women high in “self-objectification”: • Have ineffective motor performance (Fredrickson & Harrison, 2005) • Hold negative views about body functions (e.g., Roberts, 2004) • Are less assertive and interested in sex (e.g., Impett et al., 2004) • Feel less competent (i.e., self-efficacy) and purposeful (i.e., intrinsic

    motivation) (Gapinski et al., 2003)

    Objectification Theory (Fredrickson & Roberts, 1997)

  • Objectified Women are:

    • Perceived as less competent and warm (Heflick, Goldenberg, Cooper, & Puvia, 2011)

    • Denied mind and moral status (Loughnan et al., 2010)

    • Attributed less agency (Cikara, Eberhardt, & Fiske, 2011)

    • Perceived as interchangeable, or fungible (Gervais, Vesco, & Allen, in press)

    • Recognized with cognitive processes similar to perceiving objects (Bernard, Gervais, Allen, Campomizzi, & Klein, in press)

    • Attributed less human nature (Heflick & Goldenberg, 2009)

    New Approach in Psychology: Objectification of Others

  • Focus on Appearance

  • Roberts, Goldenberg, Manly, & Pyszczynski, 2002

    3.06

    7.06

    2

    4

    6

    8

    Hair Clip Tampon

    Val

    ue

    Ap

    pea

    ran

    ce

    Beauty as a Solution

  • Pregnant Images

  • Morris, Goldenberg, & Heflick, in prep

    4.64

    -2.46

    2.29

    10.54

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    Non-Pregnant Pregnant

    Self

    -ob

    ject

    ific

    atio

    n Q

    ues

    tio

    nn

    aire

    Pain

    Death

    Pregnancy and Women’s Appearance Striving

  • Conclusion

    “Objectification entails making into a thing, treating as a thing, something that is really not a thing” (Nussbaum, 1995)

    But Why?

    accounting for: (1) women’s self-objectification and (2) men’s attraction to women

    OBJECTS DON’T DIE!