the general level framework handbook - codeg · the general level framework. handbook. ... more...
TRANSCRIPT
A Competency Framework forSingHealth
Pharmacists to provide
Minimum Standard of General Pharmacy Practice:
The General Level FrameworkHandbook
First EditionFebruary 2011
Adapted with permission from the Safe Medication Practice Unit, Queensland Health and the NHS London and South East - Competency
Development and Evaluation Group.
Contents
Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………………. Page 2
Background……………………………………………………………………………………………... Page 3
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………... Page 4
Assessment Rating…………………………………………………………………………………….. Page 5
Assessment Tools…………………………………………………………………………………….. Page 6
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX)……………………………………………………….. Page 7
Case based Discussions (CbD)………………………………………………………………………. Page 8
Medication Review & Dispensing Observations……………………………………………………. Page 10
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies………………………………………………………….. Page 13
2. Problem Solving Competencies………………………………………………………………...... Page 33
3. Professional Competencies……………………………………………………………………….. Page 41
At The End of The Assessment Period……………………………………………………………… Page 48
Appendix 1: The General Level Framework
Appendix 2: GLF Mapping
Appendix 3: Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) Form
Appendix 4: Case based Discussion (CbD) Form
Appendix 5A: Medication Review / Dispensing Observation for GLF Pharmacist
Appendix 5B: Dispensing Observation for GLF Pharmacist
Appendix 6: GLF Assessment Summary
Acknowledgements The following people are acknowledged for their contributions and efforts towards the
production of this handbook:
- Angelina Tan Hui Min, Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital
- Camilla Wong Ming Lee, Allied Health Division, Singapore General Hospital
- Jacqueline Ong Kia Geok, Allied Health Division, Singapore General Hospital
- Lim Kiat Wee, Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital
- Lim Paik Shia, Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital
- Yee Mei Ling, Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital
- Patricia Ng Lai Lin, SingHealth Academy (Editorial Support)
- Anita Binte Mohamed Sani, Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital (Cover Page Design)
Page 2 of 48
Background
The scope of pharmacy practice in Singapore has increased tremendously in recent
years. It is crucial that pharmacists have adequate postgraduate education, training
and guidance to enable them to perform competently so as to ensure safe and
effective patient care.
In 2007 the Singapore General Hospital (SGH), a member of the Singapore Health
Services (Singhealth) group, started collaborations with the UK Competency
Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG) to adapt their General Level
Framework (GLF) for use in SGH. The GLF is an assessment and developmental
tool that encompasses the holistic scope of pharmacy practice, namely knowledge,
skills and attitudes. Ultimately, the aim is to develop competent pharmacists who will
provide safe and effective healthcare to the nation.
In May 2009, an adapted version of the GLF was initiated within the Department of
Pharmacy. In December of the same year, experts from CoDEG visited Singapore
and a Memorandum of Understanding was exchanged between CoDEG and
Singhealth, a milestone in the continued collaboration between the two parties. In
addition, the experts conducted a GLF training programme that included a ‘train the
trainers’ session in which Singhealth pharmacists were educated and trained on the
framework’s concepts and processes, and who then took the lead in the training of
other GLF assessors within their own institutions. In 2010, all of the Singhealth
pharmacy leaders agreed to adopt a unified ‘SingHealth’ GLF. This was a major
breakthrough.
Recent developments have also seen the Singapore Ministry of Health (MOH)
endorse the use of such competency frameworks as part of the new national career
pathway for pharmacists. This is an exciting development, which has put
Singhealth’s competency training initiatives at the forefront of the profession’s
development in Singapore.
Page 3 of 48
Introduction
The purpose of this document is to provide guidance on the Singhealth General
Level Competency Framework. (Refer to Appendix 1)
A competency framework is a collection of competencies that are thought to be
central to effective performance. Competency frameworks can be used to support a
range of different things. Typically, they are used to help with:
Training and development;
Performance review.
It is envisaged that this framework will be used to help with pharmacist training and
developmental activities. However, as the pharmacist develops, the framework also
has the potential to be used as a tool to help in appraisal and to track performance.
Page 4 of 48
Assessment Rating
The assessment rating is on a 4-point scale i.e. “Rarely”, “Sometimes”, “Usually” and
“Consistently” (see Table 1). An ‘Unable to Assess’ option is available for occasions
when a competency cannot be observed or is not appropriate.
Assessment should be referenced to the standard expected at a particular level of
practice. This may vary between levels of practitioners (for example, that expected of
a newly registered pharmacist will differ from that expected of a more experienced
pharmacist). Please refer to Appendix 2 for the current Singhealth mapping
reference.
Table 1: Frequency Ranges for Assessment Ratings
Rating Definition Percentage
Expression
Consistently Consistently demonstrates the expected standard
practice, with very rare lapses.
85–100%
Usually Demonstrates expected standard practice with
occasional lapses.
51–84%
Sometimes Demonstrates expected standard practice in less than
half the time observed. Much more haphazard than
“usually”.
25–50%
Rarely Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical
thought process appears to apply.
0–24%
Page 5 of 48
Assessment Tools
As a result of ongoing implementation of the framework, various other assessment
tools have been developed. These tools provide formative assessments which are
designed to complement the GLF and help to identify areas for development and
monitor performance. They have been adapted from similar tools developed by
CoDEG and include:
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) — Refer to Appendix 3;
Case-based Discussions (CbD) — Refer to Appendix 4;
Medication Review and Dispensing Observations - Refer to Appendices 5A
and 5B.
A portfolio (based on this framework) and the associated assessment tools can be
used to demonstrate a pharmacist’s ability to work at a general level. This provides a
platform for further development to a higher practice level.
Page 6 of 48
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX)
Purpose: The Mini-CEX is designed to assess the skills essential to the provision of
pharmaceutical care.
Competencies assessed: The pharmacist will be assessed on the competencies of
gathering and analysing information, evaluating appropriateness of drug selection
and providing the necessary patient education. Communication skills with the other
healthcare providers, patients and caregivers will also reflect the pharmacist’s
problem-solving skills and professionalism.
Setting: It is preferable to discuss cases that are currently under the pharmacist’s
care i.e. inpatients or outpatients.
Feedback: Timely feedback should be provided after each encounter by the
assessor. In keeping with the quality improvement assessment model, strengths and
areas for development will be identified following each Mini-CEX.
The documentation (or a copy) of a Mini-CEX should be retained by the pharmacist in his / her career portfolio. The assessment should end with formulating at least one learning objective for the next encounter with the assessor.
Page 7 of 48
Case-based Discussions (CbD)
Purpose: CbD is designed to assess analytical skills and decision making, as well as
the clinical application of pharmaceutical knowledge in the care of the pharmacist’s
own patients. It also enables the discussion of professionalism and the ethical
aspects of practice, and in all instances, allows pharmacists to discuss why they
acted as they did.
Competencies assessed: The pharmacist’s ability to identify drug-related problems,
analysis and treatment recommendations, follow-up and monitoring, communication
with other healthcare professionals, consideration of patient concordance,
professionalism and overall clinical judgement will be assessed. Refer to Table 2 for
the relevant descriptors.
Setting: It is preferable that each CbD focus on a clinical area which the pharmacist
has been involved in. The case discussion could be conducted retrospectively, i.e.
after counselling or patient discharge. A variety of areas should be covered through
a number of CbDs.
Feedback: Timely feedback should be provided after each encounter by the
assessor. In keeping with the quality improvement assessment model, strengths and
areas for development will be identified following each CbD.
The documentation (or a copy) of a CbD should be retained by the pharmacist in his
/ her career portfolio. The assessment should end with formulating at least one
learning objective for the next encounter with the assessor.
Page 8 of 48
Table 2: Competency Areas and Relevant Descriptors
Competency Areas Descriptor
Identification of
drug-related
problems (DRP)
Able to correctly identify and prioritise DRPs.
Analysis and
treatment
recommendations
Able to discuss treatment of the main medical problems
including drug therapy (mechanism of action of drugs, dosage
range, key pharmacokinetic consideration, cautions,
contraindications, common side effects, major drug / food
interactions, patient counselling points), utilising evidence-
based treatment guidelines where appropriate.
Follow-up and
monitoring
Able to discuss the rationale for pharmaceutical care.
Able to demonstrate appropriate monitoring of therapy
(including renal function test, full blood count, drug levels etc)
Professionalism Able to prioritise activities and demonstrate timeliness.
Is ethical and aware of any relevant legal frameworks.
Has insight into own limitations.
Overall clinical care Able to demonstrate sound judgement in the provision of
patient care.
Page 9 of 48
Medication Review and Dispensing Observations
Purpose: The Medication Review / Dispensing Observations tool document findings
during medication review and dispensing for pharmacists.
Competencies assessed: The pharmacist will be assessed on the ability to manage
the patients assigned, prioritising the tasks and handling urgent and important
interventions appropriately as well as showing effective communication skills.
Setting: Inpatient - During medication review round, and / or bedside / counter
dispensing. Outpatient - During medication review at ambulatory clinics and / or
counter dispensing.
Feedback: Timely feedback should be provided after each encounter by the
assessor. In keeping with the quality improvement assessment model, strengths and
areas for development will be identified following each observation.
The documentation (or a copy) of the findings should be retained by the pharmacist in his / her career portfolio. The assessment should end with formulating at least one learning objective for the next encounter with the assessor.
Page 10 of 48
The General Level Framework
Page 11 of 48
Section One
Delivery of Patient Care Competencies
Page 12 of 48
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies
PATIENT CONSULTATION
This competency incorporates the structure and processes needed to obtain and
document information relating to the patient’s visit / admission, which will provide a
baseline for ongoing pharmaceutical care. The personal skills needed for effective
communication in this process are described in the professional competencies.
1.1 Opening the Consultation
A pharmacist should always provide clear introduction to the consultation and agree
on an agenda with the patient. After determining the ability of the patient to
communicate, confirming the time is convenient to the patient and adopting a
suitable position to enable the consultation to take place comfortably, the pharmacist
should:
greet the patient or caregiver and establish his / her identity;
introduce himself / herself and other colleagues if present;
explain what the pharmacist is hoping to achieve, e.g. taking medication
history, drug specific counselling or a medication chart review;
respect the patient’s right to decline an interview or consultation, or choose a
more appropriate time for the interview.
1.2 Questioning
Pharmacists must determine the specific goals of the interview and tailor the
questions and discussion to obtain the necessary data. The pharmacist must talk at
a level which enables the patient to hear, but does not compromise patient
confidentiality. Appropriate language must be used i.e. non judgemental, non
alarmist, reassuring, and using terminology that the patient will understand.
Questions must be relevant and succinct, as exhaustive interviews may be counter-
productive. Appropriate questioning makes it easier to obtain relevant information
from the patient. For example, begin the medication history interview with open-
Page 13 of 48
ended questions to encourage the patient to explain and elaborate, then move to
close-ended questions to systematically minimise omissions. Leading questions
should be avoided as they can result in false information.
GATHERING INFORMATION
1.3 Allergies
To document an accurate and comprehensive allergy / adverse drug reaction (ADR)
history, the pharmacist should:
confirm with the patient any history of drug allergies or previous adverse
reactions to any agents;
document the drug, reaction and date of reaction (if known) on the
prescription;
document as “NKDA” (No Known Drug Allergy) on the prescription if the
patient reports no history of ADR or allergy;
notify the doctor-in-charge of the drug allergy and reactions reported by the
patient and document as appropriate in the medication records and / or case
notes, and / or prescriptions, in a timely manner.
It is important to follow institutional policy regarding documentation of allergy / ADR
history in the patient’s case notes. As institutions move towards electronic
medication records, the above should be documented electronically.
1.4 Relevant Patient Background
Background information about the patient’s health and social status is important in
the provision of pharmaceutical care. Without this information it is difficult to establish
the existence of, or potential for, medication-related problems. Review of medication
charts and prescriptions without this information risks flawed judgements on the
appropriateness of therapy for that individual. The details required depend on the
circumstances. The data collected should be succinct and relevant. The key focus
should be on obtaining the most relevant data rather than collection of all
information.
Page 14 of 48
Details required may include:
Age — the very young and the very old are most at risk of medication-related
problems. A patient’s age will indicate their likely ability to metabolise and
excrete medications and therefore has implications for appropriate selection
of drug dosage.
Gender — may impact on the choice of therapy for certain conditions.
Ethnic background / religion — pharmaceutical implications of this information
include racial pre-dispositions to intolerance or ineffectiveness of drug
classes, e.g. ACE-inhibitors in Afro-Caribbean individuals, or the unsuitability
of drug formulations, e.g. blood products in Jehovah’s Witness patients,
porcine-derived products for Jewish and Muslim patients.
Social background — this may impact on their ability to manage their
medications and influence their pharmaceutical care needs e.g. what are their
home circumstances? Do they live in their own home or in residential
accommodation? Do they have a visiting nurse or caregivers? etc.
Presenting condition — establish what symptoms the patient described and
the signs identified by the doctor on examination. Could these be adverse
effects related to prescribed or purchased medication? Could the lack of
symptom control indicate poor adherence, inadequate dose or inappropriate
agent?
Working diagnosis of the medical team treating the patient — how would this
condition likely be managed? What drug therapy would be considered
appropriate and evidence-based? This will give an indication as to the classes
of medications that one should expect to see on the medication chart.
Previous medical history — concurrent medical conditions may guide the
selection of appropriate therapy. Knowing the patient’s concurrent medical
conditions will help the pharmacist identify potential drug-disease
contraindications and ensure that management of the acute newly diagnosed
problem does not compromise a prior condition.
Relevant laboratory or other findings (if available) — focus on findings that will
Page 15 of 48
Renal Function
Liver Function
Full Blood Count
Blood Pressure
Cardiac Rhythm
Heart Rate
Temperature
Pain Scores
Consider not only the impact that these findings could have on the ongoing
management of drug therapy e.g. the need for dose adjustments, but also whether
these results could have been caused by an unwanted drug effect.
Establishing this background information will allow you to make a more
accurate assessment of the appropriateness of therapy.
Sources of Patient Information
Obtaining relevant information will depend on your sector of practice. Sources of
patient information include medical, nursing and electronic records, as well as
directly from the patient or carer themselves. The most concise information source
should be used. Routine review of medical notes (if available) and all laboratory tests
may be time consuming, inappropriate and unnecessary for the retrieval of basic
information. Possible sources of information include:
Nurses (including community nurses) – they are the frontline care providers for
the patients in a hospital and increasingly in primary care. Hence developing a
good working relationship with the nursing staff is a valuable exercise. In a
hospital, the nursing team may provide excellent information about the patient’s
current condition.
Patients – they are often able to provide information, particularly in relation to
Page 16 of 48
Case notes – these will provide the most detailed description of the patient’s care
to date, although they are often lengthy and repetitive and should therefore be
used to confirm findings, rather than as a first source of reference. Previous
hospital admissions and subsequent discharge summaries, or prescriptions are
often useful to clarify medication histories.
Allied health professionals – these professionals e.g. physiotherapists, social
services care workers, occupational therapists etc. may be involved in the
patient’s medicine management e.g. assessing compliance and recommending
compliance aids.
Laboratory results systems – if laboratory results are readily available,
pharmacists should ensure that they have personal access and have been
trained in retrieving correct patient information from the database.
As institutions move towards electronic medical records, the above could be
retrieved electronically. Finally, it should be remembered that all patient information
is CONFIDENTIAL and should not be discussed with anyone not involved in that
patient’s care.
1.5 Medication Reconciliation
An accurate medication history will assist in patient care and should include an
interview with the patient / carer. Taking accurate and complete drug histories has
been shown to have a positive effect on patient care. Pharmacists have
demonstrated an ability to accurately and reliably take medication histories. The
benefit of this to the patient lies in the fact that errors of omission or transcription
would be identified and corrected early, reducing the risk of harm and improving
care.
Queries regarding drug therapy should be clarified with the prescriber, or referred to
a more senior pharmacist. The core components of medication history taking are
listed in Tables 3 and 4.
Page 17 of 48
Table 3: Core Components of A Complete Medication History
1. Introduce yourself to the patient and explain the purpose of the visit /
consultation.
2. Identify and document any drug allergies or serious ADRs.
3. Determine the individual responsible for administration and management of
medication e.g. patient or carer.
4. Ascertain any information the patient is able to provide about their medication
from (in order of priority):
their own knowledge, the patient’s own medication list, or other
concordance aids;
the medication they brought to the hospital;
the community pharmacy;
repeat prescriptions;
a GP referral letter;
information available in medical notes;
the GP.
5. Ensure the following are recorded:
generic name of the medication (brand name to be recorded where
appropriate);
route / dosage form;
dose;
frequency;
duration of therapy if appropriate (e.g. antibiotics).
6. Document any recent changes to the medication regimen and reason(s) for
discontinuation or alteration of any medicines.
7. Ensure that items such as inhalers, eye drops and topical agents are included
and are used correctly, as patients often do not consider these to be
‘medication’;
8. Identify any self-medications that the patient may be using e.g. OTC, herbal,
homeopathic
(Source: Safe Medication Practice Unit, Queensland 2005)
Page 18 of 48
Table 4: Medication History Checklist
The patient should be specifically questioned regarding use of the
following items:
Prescription medication
Sleeping tablets
Inhalers: puffers, sprays; sublingual tablets
Oral contraceptives, HRT
OTC, Analgesics esp. - NSAIDS, paracetamol +/- codeine
Gastrointestinal drugs (for reflux, heartburn, constipation, diarrhoea)
Complementary medicines (e.g. herbals, vitamins)
Topical medicines (e.g. patches, creams, ointments)
Inserted medication (e.g. nose/ eye/ ear drops, pessaries, suppositories)
Injected medication (e.g. Insulin)
Intermittent treatments (i.e. weekly, monthly)
Recently completed courses of medicine/ other people’s medicine
Social and recreational drugs;
Any previous allergies or adverse reactions.
(Source: Safe Medication Practice Unit, Queensland 2005)
Medication History
Although a patient / carer interview should be the primary source of data, a
combination sources can be used to obtain the medication history. If the patient is
not responsible for medication administration or if a reliable medication history
cannot be obtained from the patient / carer, then alternative sources of patient
information must be accessed. The information sources may include:
Medication dispensing history from previous hospital admissions and / or
community pharmacies;
Administration records from nursing homes, community hospitals or other
care facilities;
Other healthcare professionals i.e. GPs, community nurses;
Page 19 of 48
Patient’s own medication or list of medications;
Patient’s prescriptions (discharge and outpatient prescriptions).
The medication history obtained should be reconciled with that recorded in case
notes by medical staff and also with the inpatient medication record at the time of
admission. The pharmacist must be able to justify changes made to medications
taken prior to and on admission. If any changes of therapy were identified, check the
case notes and ascertain if these variances are intentional. The patient, nursing staff
and medical staff may also be contacted. Unintentional changes should be clarified
and communicated to the primary team medical officers or consultant and staff
nurses as appropriate.
If significant unresolved variances exist, and a medical officer and / or consultant
cannot be contacted, the issues should be documented as a pharmacy intervention
forms or case notes. Inform the nurse looking after the patient of any medication-
related problems. It is imperative that such problems are followed up at a later time
to ensure appropriate resolution.
As part of good pharmacy practice, all interventions (resolved or unresolved)
should be documented in the patient’s case notes.
Medications currently prescribed for the patient must also be reconciled with their
current problems and relevant patient background, for example with respect to
interactions as detailed in section 2.7
Discharge Prescription
Discharge prescription / medication must be checked against the patient’s current
medication record. Reconcile discharged medications prescribed against the current
inpatient active medications list. Ensure that all drugs are reflected accurately on
discharge prescriptions. When discrepancies are identified, ascertain if the difference
is an error or intentional, for example:
“When required” medication used in hospital not required for discharge e.g.
analgesics, anti-emetics;
Regular inpatient medication used in hospital not required for discharge e.g.
Page 20 of 48
Completed courses of Antibiotics;
Chemotherapy;
Changes intended for discharge documented in case notes.
If discrepancies require clarification, the prescriber(s) should be contacted for
confirmation of drug orders.
Discharge prescription / medication should be checked against admission history.
Reconcile discharge medication against admission medication, thus ensuring:
Ongoing medication is prescribed / supplied / documented as appropriate
according to hospital policy;
Changes made during admission are identified so that details can be relayed
to the patient or community healthcare providers;
Patients’ own medications are checked against discharge prescription if
appropriate;
Patient’s own medication are checked with respect to dose, formulation,
strength, and quantity;
Labels are checked to ensure that they reflect current dosage and frequency
instructions.
PROVISION OF MEDICATION
The pharmacist should ensure that the medication as prescribed can be supplied
and administered safely and effectively to the individual patient. Particular attention
should be paid to the monitoring of parenteral therapy, which carries the additional
risk of extravasation, infection and administration errors.
1.6 Prescription is Unambiguous
Ensure all aspects of the prescription — drug name, dose, administration routes and
times — are clear and legible, in accordance with the medication, drug dispensing
Page 21 of 48
and controlled drug policy of the respective institutions.
Ensure all medications are prescribed by generic names, except combination
products and some controlled drugs, according to MOH guidelines. To minimise
selection of the wrong drug, prescribing by brand name is sometimes preferred e.g.
in combination products and certain controlled drug formulations. Examples include:
Fungizone® - Amphotericin B vs AmBisome® - Amphotericin (Liposomal) vs
Abelcet ® - Amphotericin (Phospholipid complex)
OxyContin® – Controlled released oxycodone vs OxyNorm® – Immediate
released oxycodone
Humalog Mix (Insulin Lispro / Protamine 30/70) which is not interchangeable with
NovoMix (Insulin Aspart / Protamine 30/70)
1.7 Prescription is Legal
Check that the patient identifiers are present and the prescription is legal:
Drug, form, route, dose, frequency, date and prescriber’s signature;
Quantity and strength are also legal requirements for discharge and
outpatient prescriptions including controlled drugs.
1.8 Labelling of the Medicine
Pharmacists should ensure that the label on the dispensed medicines follow legal
requirements and clearly state the required information, i.e.
Patient name and identification number;
Drug name and strength;
Drug dosage form;
Drug dose and frequency;
Drug quantity
Special administration instructions e.g. do not chew, swallow the whole
tablet;
Page 22 of 48
Duration (if applicable);
Date of dispensing;
Pharmacy details.
1.9 Medication Supply
The prescribed medication can be made available from the hospital’s
formulary.
Consider whether the prescribed indication is within the drug’s licence
(exemption drugs procedure).
Follow local guidelines and hospital policies to obtain exemption and non-
formulary drugs and ensure that the appropriate documentation is
completed.
Communicate clearly with the relevant people to ensure the efficient and
safe supply of medication.
Ensure continuity of supply for outpatient use, inpatient use and at
discharge that will be sufficient till the next scheduled appointment or date
of expected completion of therapy.
The prescribed medication is supplied accurately and legally
Correct drug, form, strength, quantity, packaging and patient name.
The prescribed medication is labelled accurately and appropriately
As listed in 1.8.
Instructions, as necessary, are provided. Inpatient items often do not
require dosing instructions. Exceptions to this may be items that may
be self administered by the patient and may subsequently be used for
discharge supply for example metered dose aerosols, eye drops, and
topical preparations. All discharge medication supplies must be
labelled with clear dosage instructions and, where appropriate,
ancillary labels.
Page 23 of 48
Ensure medications are labelled appropriately for the patient e.g. the
visually impaired, non-English speaking patients.
The prescribed medication is provided for the patient in a timely manner
Medication should be made available in the ward for administration at
the prescribed times.
Supply of newly prescribed medication may be prioritised depending
on medical condition of the patient e.g. IV antibiotics for the critically ill.
Document the supply of the drug in the medication record
The pharmacy column in the IMR is annotated in accordance with
hospital medication policy on review and supply workflow, inclusive of
date and amount supplied.
For electronic medication administration records, dispensing system
must be able to record all the relevant information mentioned.
DRUG SPECIFIC ISSUES
1.10 Drug Selection
This relates to the principles of evidence-based medicine, clinical and cost-
effectiveness in the selection of the most appropriate drug, dose and formulation for
an individual patient, with the consideration of medical condition, co-morbidities,
financial and social issues. Pharmacists are not expected to know the full breadth of
clinical evidence for all conditions, but should have a clear understanding of, and be
able to access, local and other established prescribing guidelines. They should also
familiarise themselves with, and be able to demonstrate appreciation of, key
literature relevant to their current field of practice, for example they should be aware
of the established therapeutic services / departments. Pharmacists should also be
aware of the hospital Formulary Drug List. Postgraduate education and continuing
professional development should be guided by learning needs identified in practice.
1.11 Selection of Formulation, Concentration, Rate and Diluent
Pharmacists should check and be familiar with the following:
Page 24 of 48
Is the medication available in a suitable form for administration via the prescribed
route?
Is the route / formulation prescribed suitable for the patient e.g. oral liquid or
tablets for paediatric patients or patients fed via the nasogastric tube?
Do the nurses or doctors require any specific information in order to administer
the medication safely (e.g. appropriateness of crushing tablets, dilution
requirements for parenteral medication, rate of administration, IV compatibilities
including syringe drivers)?
Are aids required to ensure safe and effective administration (e.g. volumatic
spacers for inhalers)?
1.12 Checking of Dose, Frequency, Timing, Route and Duration
The pharmacist should assess the prescription to ensure that the dose is
appropriate. This includes adjustments for:
Patient weight;
Patient age;
Disease states e.g. renal / hepatic impairment;
Route and formulation prescribed e.g. IV versus oral metronidazole, IM versus
oral anti-psychotics, liquid versus solid dosage forms;
Concurrent medications e.g. reduction of digoxin dose if used with amiodarone.
The pharmacist should assess the prescription to ensure the prescribed route is
available (e.g. is the patient nil by mouth? Is he / she able to take medicines orally?)
and appropriate (e.g. unnecessary prescription of IV medication when the patient
can swallow, or a solid dosage form when the patient has dysphagia) for that patient.
The pharmacist should assess whether the timing of the dose:
is appropriate with respect to food e.g. before food, after food;
is away from enteral, nasogastric or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
(PEG) feeds where appropriate e.g. phenytoin;
Page 25 of 48
correlates with medication administration rounds;
help to minimise the side effects, e.g. frusemide in the morning.
The pharmacist should
check the administration records of the medication and ensure that administration
has occurred and has been documented;
check with patients and / or their caregivers to ensure that patients have been
compliant with their medications at home;
identify occasions where drugs have not been administered and, if it was due to
unavailability of drug, ensure initiation of drug supply, or if it was due to non-
compliance, address the issues causing this.
PATIENT EDUCATION
It is expected that the pharmacist will provide medication and health information and
advice to patients, carers and medical staff where appropriate, e.g. in response to
information requested by an individual. In addition, the pharmacist should actively
seek opportunities to provide this aspect of the pharmacy service.
When consulting with patients and carers, the pharmacist should demonstrate a
structured, patient-centred process. The following information should be provided
where appropriate:
Information on why a particular course of action is being suggested and how to
achieve the intended outcomes;
Information on the condition as assessed during the consultation and any
changes that need to be monitored;
Information on the medication / treatment recommended and how to use it;
Advice on when it would be appropriate to seek further advice from either the
pharmacist or someone else if the condition does not improve;
A combination of any of the above.
The pharmacist must take into account the patient’s cultural and social background
Page 26 of 48
when assessing his / her health needs. This will influence the patient’s health beliefs
and may affect the style of communication adopted. Interpreter services should be
used when needed.
1.13 Patient is Counselled on Medication
In most situations, the pharmacist should personally provide information in order to
facilitate patient compliance. Information can be provided verbally or in writing and
should be provided in a way that is appropriate to the patient’s needs. For example,
information should be provided:
To the appropriate person i.e. patient and / or carer
In a manner that overcomes any potential barriers to successful information
exchange e.g. non-English speaking, cognitive impairment, deafness, visual
impairment, illiteracy
Using a format that can be comprehended e.g. non-medical jargon, appropriate
language (using an interpreter, if required), enlarged font for visually impaired
patients / carers;
Using written information to back up verbal counselling;
To demonstrate devices e.g. inhalers, insulin pens.
The following information should be provided:
Generic and brand names of the drug;
Purpose and action;
Dose, route and administration schedule;
What to do if a dose is missed;
Special directions or precautions;
Common adverse effects, ways in which to minimise them and action required if
they occur;
Details of medications ceased;
Page 27 of 48
Details of new medications or medication regimens;
Techniques for self monitoring of therapy;
Storage requirements;
Safe ways to dispose of medication;
Relevant drug-drug, drug-food, drug-alcohol and drug-procedure interactions;
Number of days of treatment supplied and the duration of treatment;
How to obtain further supplies;
Patient information leaflet as appropriate;
Relevant contact details of healthcare professionals and health services for any
follow-up information.
The pharmacist should discuss non-drug alternatives (when appropriate) as part of
their information provision, for example:
Anti-embolic stockings for prevention of venous thromboembolism, or for
treatment of deep vein thrombosis and prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome;
Heat packs (usually available from physiotherapy department);
Mobilisation;
Physiotherapy;
Relaxation techniques.
The patient’s comprehension of the information provided should be assessed. The
pharmacist should assess the patient’s understanding of the information provided by:
Asking the patient to describe how they are going to take the medication;
Asking the patient to demonstrate use of a device such as an inhaler.
Gauging the patient’s perception of their illness allows you to understand their
healthcare needs and may be related to their current illness or past medical
conditions. This knowledge will allow the pharmacist to accurately review current
Page 28 of 48
therapy and provide appropriate medicine information to the patient and / or carer.
Open ended questions such as ‘What has brought you into hospital?’ will often illicit
a patient’s perception of what has happened. This may impact on how the patient
deals with healthcare professionals and the way they use medication. A poor
understanding of their illness may need to be addressed before the patient can fully
understand what treatment is necessary and the rationale for treatment.
Assess the patient’s experience of medication use, specifically regarding:
Perceived effectiveness of medication;
Control of symptoms;
Perceived problems with this or other medication used;
Why the patient stopped / started / changed the medication.
Assess the patient’s understanding and attitude to their therapy and seek specific
information on the following:
Patient’s understanding of rationale for treatment;
Patient’s perception of the purpose of the medication;
Patient’s perception of potential adverse effects.
These perceptions may impact on the patient’s adherence to prescribed treatment.
Pharmacists should actively explore the patient’s need for lifestyle advice e.g. diet,
smoking and exercise. An awareness of local services and initiatives and the referral
process in primary care or discharge planning is essential e.g. Health Promotion
Board (HPB) Quitline, smoking cessation services at the respective hospitals or
community pharmacies.
1.14 Compliance Assessment
Non-adherence may be due to perceived adverse effects, and could be contributing
to the present condition. Use a non-judgemental, empathetic approach and open-
ended questions. Assess the patient’s adherence by normalising poor compliance for
example asking:
Page 29 of 48
“People often have difficulty taking their medication… Do you have any difficulty
taking your medication?”
“About how often would you say you miss taking your medication?”
How are you taking the medicine? You have the supply at home?” for the
medicines that are always not collected from hospital/ polyclinic pharmacy.
Inform the medical staff if significant areas of poor compliance are identified.
Strategies to address poor compliance include use of dose administration aids, e.g.
education of carers, discharge medication records, a reduction in the number of
medications or simplification of the drug regimen, and / or changing to cheaper
alternatives where appropriate.
Knowing how medicines were managed prior to the patient’s hospital admission
allows therapy to be appropriately tailored to the patient and additional supports to
be initiated if needed. Factors such as cognition, alertness, mental acuity, literacy,
vision impairment and physical disabilities may impact the patient’s ability to manage
his / her medication.
For example:
Patients with impaired cognition or alertness may require medication compliance
aids, dosette boxes or additional supports, such as, community nurse visits or
assistance of family members in medication administration.
Patients with vision impairment, especially common in diabetic patients, may
require large-print labels and written information.
1.15 Need for Information Identified
Individuals have differing information needs. Pharmacists should be cautious about
providing information to patients in a ‘blanket’ format, and should tailor their provision
of information to individual circumstances. For example, general drug-specific
counselling advice may not be appropriate for patients who have been on a
medication long term. These patients will more likely require specific information
relevant to their situation. This will not be established unless the pharmacist allows
the patient an opportunity to ask questions early in the consultation.
Page 30 of 48
The pharmacist must retrieve information specific to a patient’s needs. Patients
commencing a medication are likely to require general information on indication,
administration, side effects and supply. Patients with ongoing supply may request
specific information regarding side effects they have experienced or use in
circumstances such as pregnancy and lactation.
The information must be accurate and retrieved from a reliable source such as
Lexicomp, SGH ePharmacopoeia, MIMS, product inserts, published literature or
medical databases such as Micromedex®.
RISK MANAGEMENT & SERVICE IMPROVEMENT
1.16 Risk Management
The pharmacist should be aware of and keep updated on the established policies
and procedures with respect to medication error prevention and reporting.
Pharmacist active participation is essential for ongoing analysis and monitoring of
medication errors. Suggestions to initiate safety measures should be discussed and
actively implemented and lessons learned should be disseminated in department
meetings.
In the medication review process and multidisciplinary ward rounds, pharmacists
should actively take the initiative to monitor, report and prevent medication errors
and adverse drug reactions.
1.17 Service Improvement
The pharmacist should routinely participate in quality improvement activities related
to the distribution, administration and use of medications particularly at ward level
and at the department level in general. In delivering patient care, the pharmacist
should proactively identify issues, discuss and ensure compliance to medication-
related policies and procedures. In providing service to patients, the pharmacist
should constantly seek quality improvement when applicable and should integrate
the practice standards with the hospital policies and procedures.
Page 31 of 48
Constructive feedback to the relevant individuals / pharmacists about the quality
achieved should be encouraged. It will not only help the pharmacist but the rest of
the team to strive towards a higher standard of service to patients.
Reflection and evaluation of practice is essential if an individual pharmacist is going
to undertake effective work-based learning. Contributions to care should be recorded
and followed up where possible to establish the outcomes of individual actions. It
may not be appropriate or possible for a pharmacist to follow the care of an
individual patient in every case, but effective communication with colleagues will
often establish outcomes. Pharmacists can assure evaluation of contribution by
reflecting on service delivery or patient encounter and identifying a resultant service
improvement or learning need.
Page 32 of 48
2. Problem Solving Competencies
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
2.1 Identification of Drug-related Problems
The pharmacist should be able to identify high risk medications and patients for
whom ongoing monitoring of therapy is required. The pharmacist should monitor for
effectiveness of treatment and potential adverse effects, and also establish and
maintain a plan for reviewing the therapeutic objective / end point of treatment.
High Risk Medications
Anticoagulants (warfarin, heparin, enoxaparin)
Drugs with narrow therapeutic range (e.g. digoxin, lithium, theophylline, immuno-
suppressants)
NSAID or opiate analgesic
IV antibiotics (e.g. gentamicin, vancomycin)
Chemotherapy
Electrolyte supplementation (IV potassium, IV magnesium)
Drugs requiring TDM + interpretation
Anti-epileptics (phenytoin, valproic acid, carbamazepine)
Insulin
High Risk Patient Groups
Renal impairment
Cardiac
Liver disease
Transplantation
Mental health
Page 33 of 48
Cancer
Paediatrics
Elderly
Unstable clinical condition
The pharmacist should be able to prioritise the medication management problems of
both individual patients and the group of patients for whom they are responsible.
2.2 Prioritisation
Once a problem has been identified, the pharmacist must be able to identify the
urgency of resolution and appropriately prioritise their actions. Factors that may be
considered include:
Is the patient likely to be harmed?
When is the next dose due?
Can the dose be withheld until the problem is resolved?
What do I need to do to resolve this problem?
Who do I need to inform regarding this problem e.g. nurse, doctor, patient?
Having identified and prioritised drug-related problems, the pharmacist should
ensure that an appropriate course of action is identified and implemented. If actions
by multiple healthcare professionals are required for resolution of the problems, the
pharmacist should accurately communicate to the relevant personnel the action
required and the urgency of that action. At all times, the pharmacist must ensure that
no harm comes to the patient.
2.3 Consultation or Referral
The pharmacist should be aware of his / her own limitations and always consult a
more senior colleague if necessary or refer the patient appropriately to another
healthcare professional. Referral can occur at different points during an episode of
care, for example:
Page 34 of 48
On the first review, when there is inappropriateness of medication management;
At the end of the consultation with the patient, when drug-related problems have
been identified and referral is needed to medical staff and community health
support.
The referral and consultation process should form part of continuing professional
development and it is expected that during the course of an individual’s work,
repeated exposure to similar pharmaceutical problems will result in development of
the pharmacist’s experience and competence.
KNOWLEDGE
2.4 Pathophysiology
An understanding of normal organ function and the effect of disease state on this is
relevant to the effects of, and the effects on, drug therapy. The pharmacist should be
able to clearly describe the pathophysiology relevant to the therapeutic areas in
which they are currently working and apply this knowledge when reviewing the
therapeutic use of drugs.
2.5 Pharmacology
The pharmacist should be able to clearly discuss the mode of action of medications
that they routinely review in the course of their daily practice. An appreciation of the
absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination of these medications and the
influence of disease states (e.g. renal failure) and patient factors (e.g. age) should
also be demonstrated.
2.6 Side Effects and Monitoring
Knowledge of the common and major side effect profile of routinely used
medications must be demonstrated. The pharmacist should be able to both discuss
the potential for these with patients and recognise and describe any appropriate
monitoring parameters.
2.7 Interactions (Drug / Disease / Special Patient Groups)
The pharmacist should be able to describe the different mechanisms of drug
Page 35 of 48
interactions and be able to identify which type of interaction applies.
With the appropriate use of reference material, pharmacists are expected to:
Identify common, well-documented, clinically significant drug interactions
(including complementary medication);
Identify the mechanism by which the interaction occurs;
Be able to recognise medications with increased risk of potential interactions, e.g.
those with narrow therapeutic indices, those metabolised by the CYP450 system
and those which are inducers or inhibitors of the CYP450 system;
Assess the actual or potential interaction for clinical significance and
management options, prioritise the problem and refer as appropriate, using Table
4 as a guide
With regards to individual, patient-specific interactions and contra indications /
cautions to medication in certain patient groups, a pharmacist should:
Understand the potential for unwanted effects of medications, e.g. allergies and
other adverse drug reactions (ADRs);
Ensure that any allergy or ADR is identified and documented;
Review the prescription to ensure that no medications likely to cause harm have
been prescribed;
Assess actual or potential interaction for clinical significance and management
options, prioritise the problem and refer as appropriate using Table 4 as a guide.
With regards to contraindications / cautions that should be applied to the use of
individual drugs in a range of pathophysiological conditions, a pharmacist should be
able to:
Understand the mode of action and pharmacokinetics of the medications;
Understand how these mechanisms may be altered by the disease (e.g. renal
impairment);
Assess the actual or potential interaction for clinical significance and
Page 36 of 48
Table 5: Prioritising Action (Risk Rating based on Harm)
Extreme Consequence major or extreme OR probability
of occurrence likely or almost certain OR time
frame to harm is < 1 hour
Act Now
Very High Consequence moderate OR possibly will
occur OR time frame to harm is < 4 hours
Act < 4 hours
High / Medium Consequence minor OR unlikely to occur OR
time frame to harm is today
Before leaving
work
Low Consequence negligible OR harm rare OR not
likely to impact on patient outcome today
Tomorrow
(Source: Safe Medication Practice Unit, Queensland 2005)
ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
2.8 Use of Guidelines and Evidence
A pharmacist should be able to demonstrate an awareness of guidelines available
for the clinical field in which they are practising. Pharmacists should also know the
practical implications of these guidelines. Guidelines may be local policies or national
guidelines from established groups (e.g. MOH Clinical Practice Guidelines,
AHA/ACC guidelines). The pharmacist should be able to utilise guidelines and be
aware of both the advantages and disadvantages of their use, and show regard for
individual patient need when using guidelines.
Following review of the guidelines, the pharmacist should demonstrate the ability to
summarise the information and extract the key points that influence drug therapy.
The pharmacist should demonstrate the ability to effectively evaluate information
they have retrieved. This could be for a variety of purposes including designing a
patient information leaflet or critically appraising information about new products. The
Page 37 of 48
pharmacist should be able to assess information for the following aspects:
Reliability of source — depending on the nature of information retrieved, the
pharmacist should be able to evaluate the likely accuracy of information and any
likelihood of bias (e.g. pharmaceutical company sponsored information).
Relevance to patient care — the impact or potential impact that the information
has on the pharmaceutical care of the individual patient or group of patients.
Required response — the pharmacist should demonstrate the ability to identify an
appropriate response, both in the nature of the action required and the priority
that it should be assigned.
The pharmacist should demonstrate that they have considered the various options
available to them to resolve a problem. They should consider the possible outcomes
of any action and recognise the pros and cons of the various options. In order to
achieve this, the pharmacist should determine the goal of treatment. This might be
one of the following:
Curing a disease or disorder;
Reducing or eliminating a symptom;
Arresting or slowing disease progression;
Preventing a disease;
A combination of any of the above.
Having appraised a selection of options, the pharmacist should be able to identify the
most appropriate solution and be able to justify the decision taken. However,
pharmacists should recognise their personal limitations and seek advice from
another colleague wherever necessary.
2.9 Information Provision to Other Healthcare Professionals
Whenever medication-related information is requested, or a need for information is
identified, it is the pharmacist’s responsibility to ensure that the response they give is
accurate. Information should be assessed from reliable sources and, if necessary,
Page 38 of 48
reference should be made to appropriate literature or to colleagues.
The content and style of presentation should be appropriate to the recipient’s needs.
Establishing the reason for the request and appreciating what action will be taken on
receipt of the information should be a first priority. The pharmacist should
demonstrate that they have considered these aspects and respond appropriately by
tailoring the information that they provide.
When information is requested, or the need for information is identified, the
pharmacist should provide it in a timely manner. It may be that the information is
immediately required for patient care and it will take priority over other activities e.g.
management of drug alerts in the critically ill.
FOLLOW-UP
2.10 Documentation of Drug-related Problems
It is necessary to document medication-related problems so there is a record of
pharmaceutical input to the patient’s care. This facilitates follow-up by other
healthcare professionals, ensures resolution of medication-related problems and
ensures documentation of ongoing monitoring requirements. Documentation can be
made in pharmaceutical care plans, in pharmacy intervention forms, in patients’
medical record or on locally accepted tools, e.g. clinical pathways. Include all
relevant information pertaining to pharmaceutical care for example:
Relevant background information;
Problems identified and resolution gained;
Results of relevant laboratory tests / investigations;
Ongoing monitoring requirements;
Education needs;
Compliance issues / aids.
Intervention should be documented in accordance with the hospital pharmacy
department policy.
Page 39 of 48
2.11 Monitoring and Problem Resolution
Once a medication has been appropriately selected for a patient, supplied and
administered, ongoing use of the drug should be assessed, both for the desired
therapeutic effect and the appearance of adverse reactions. Therapeutic drug
monitoring (TDM) is an essential duty for hospital pharmacists. Assessment involves
the following steps:
1. Identify patients at high risk of drug-related problems;
2. Identify monitoring parameters for ongoing disease management, e.g. BP,
cholesterol, etc.;
3. Evaluate the patient against these parameters;
4. Recommend appropriate monitoring to medical staff;
5. Discuss with a colleague if necessary;
6. Review ALL current inpatient medication records (including IV fluids, heparin,
insulin, eye drops and PCA charts etc.) and if needed, patient clinical charts/
flowsheets;
7. Discuss changes to medication with medical staff if required.
If a problem is identified by or reported to a pharmacist, it is his / her responsibility to
ensure that it is appropriately resolved. This may not require his / her direct action,
but he / she must ensure that the appropriate person is alerted to the situation and
that accurate information is given to the other party. As a minimum, the pharmacist
must ensure that no harm comes to the patient.
For development purposes, the pharmacist should seek to follow up on problems,
both those that they had dealt with directly and those that were referred to another
party, and reflect on the outcomes.
Page 40 of 48
3. Professional Competencies
ORGANISATION
3.1 Prioritisation
The pharmacist should be able to prioritise his / her own work and adjust priorities in
response to changing circumstances; for example, knowing which patients / tasks
should take priority. Prioritisation of clinical workload may include:
Identifying all new patient admissions;
Obtaining and recording a complete medication history for new patients;
Identifying patients approaching discharge and establishing their need for
discharge medications and information;
Ensuring that all medications are appropriate and that the patient is informed
about their medications;
Ensuring newly prescribed medications are safe for the patients and sufficient
supplies are available;
Monitoring narrow therapeutic index drugs and other identified monitoring
parameters;
Monitoring parenteral therapy;
Evaluating current medication for safety and effectiveness.
3.2 Punctuality
The pharmacist should ensure he / she attends appointments and meetings on time,
and is there to provide cover at previously agreed times, e.g. back from lunch or the
ward as rostered.
3.3 Time Management
The pharmacist should organise his /her time effectively, assigning appropriate
amounts of time to different tasks with regular review and revision of time frames and
Page 41 of 48
deadlines. For example, a pharmacist may be allocated a morning to cover a ward.
He / she may spend his / her time seeing new patients, reviewing existing patients,
providing counselling and organising discharges. If any of these time lines slip, the
others have to be adjusted to allow the work on the ward to be completed in the
allocated time.
Pharmacists should be able to use their time productively with minimum waste. For
example, only review the renal function of patients taking medications that may
require dose adjustment, rather than routinely check and record the renal function of
the all patients regardless of medical conditions.
The pharmacist should be able to complete tasks within a previously agreed time
frame. This time frame may be set by a pharmacy manager, supervisor, or someone
outside the pharmacy department (e.g. consultant or nurse manager). For example,
reviewing and conducting medication reconciliation for new cases of the allocated
ward on a daily basis; or having discharge medication ready prior to the patient
leaving by ambulance.
3.4 Initiative
The pharmacist should demonstrate initiative in solving a problem or taking on a new
opportunity / task without the prompting from others, and demonstrate the ability to
work independently within their limitations.
PROFESSIONALISM
3.5 Professional Code of Ethics
The pharmacist must behave in an ethical manner in accordance with professional
codes such as:
Singapore Pharmacy Council (SPC) Code of Ethics
Singapore Pharmacy Competency Standards (MOH/SPC)
3.6 Confidentiality
As it is with all healthcare professionals, pharmacists must respect individuals’ right
to privacy, maintain confidentiality and understand the circumstances when
Page 42 of 48
information about the patient’s condition can be shared with colleagues. This
includes an awareness of hospital policies and relevant legislation, e.g. Code of
Ethics.
3.7 Confidence
All pharmacists must be confident of their own abilities and portray an image of
confidence to patients and other healthcare professionals.
3.8 Responsibility
Professional responsibility may be defined as the ability to provide an account of
professional judgements, acts and omissions in relation to a professional’s role. This
therefore requires accountability for professional practice.
In professional ethics, accountability is of paramount importance. The SPC Code of
Ethics states that, ‘A pharmacist shall take responsibility for all work done personally
and ensure that those under his direct supervision are able to carry out their duty
competently.’
The pharmacist should adopt a non-discriminatory attitude to all patients and
recognise their needs as individuals. As part of their responsibility, pharmacists
should recognise when to ask for advice and be willing to consult others. They
should act upon actual or potential errors and ensure resolution of identified issues.
The pharmacist should understand the need and take personal responsibility for
Continuing Professional Development. This involves:
Reflecting on his / her own practice, e.g. using critical incident review;
Maintaining current awareness of professional, pharmaceutical and clinical
issues (e.g. attend in-house pharmacy presentations, continuing professional
education and professional conferences as appropriate);
Maintaining a broad background clinical knowledge;
Recognising and using relevant learning opportunities;
Evaluating learning;
Page 43 of 48
Being self-motivated and eager to learn;
Showing willingness to learn from others;
Being willing to accept criticism for the benefit of his / her own development;
3.9 Organisational
The pharmacist is able to describe the structure and appreciate value of the
employing organisation. Pharmacists should take responsibility to keep themselves
updated with departmental goals and how they are aligned with institutional strategic
goals. This will provide direction to pharmacists during planning and implementation
of department work plans.
Pharmacists must develop a logical approach to their work. The competency
framework is intended to guide the activities that should be undertaken for each
patient or task, to ensure that points are not overlooked. Pharmacists should be able
to demonstrate that they use relevant and up-to-date procedure and a logical
process when delivering the assigned tasks or reviewing a prescription. This process
identifies the key action points that need to be addressed for that patient. It is
recognised, however, that individuals can use different approaches to problem
solving and still achieve the required outcome.
COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Good communication is an essential component of pharmaceutical care. It involves
communicating effectively in verbal, electronic and written form, using the language
appropriate to the recipient; for example, use of open questions initially followed by
appropriate closed questions, and supporting any recommendations with evidence.
3.10 Communication
Effective communication encompasses the following skills:
Questioning;
Explaining;
Listening — active listening demonstrates genuine respect and concern for the
Page 44 of 48
Feedback — to ensure that the message is understood. It can take the form of
appropriate questions and asking the individual to demonstrate that they have
understood or can now do what you have explained;
Empathy — seeking to understand where other people are coming from and what
their wants and needs are;
Non-verbal communication;
Overcoming physical and emotional barriers to effective communication, e.g.
speech difficulties, fear and aggression;
Negotiating;
Influencing.
The desired outcome of using effective communication skills should be a concordant
relationship. There are three aspects of concordance with medicines:
1. Patients as partners: the patient and the healthcare team participate as
partners to reach an agreement on the illness and its treatment;
2. Patients’ beliefs: the agreement on treatment draws on the experiences,
beliefs and wishes of the patient to decide when, how and why to use
medicines;
3. Professional partnerships: healthcare staff treat one another as partners and
recognise each other’s skills to improve the patient’s participation.
The ‘patient’ in this context means any person the pharmacist provides any
pharmaceutical service to. The ‘carer’ may be a relative or friend of the patient as
well as a social services or private agency care worker.
Healthcare professionals include doctors, nurses, and the other Allied Health
professionals (e.g. dietitians, medical social workers, physiotherapists, occupational
therapists, podiatrists, speech therapists, etc) as well as ward clerks, cleaners, GP
receptionists and medical secretaries.
Page 45 of 48
The pharmacist must take into account the patient’s cultural and social background
when assessing his / her needs and understanding. This will influence his / her
interpretation and may affect the style of communication adopted. Interpreter service
should be used when needed.
3.11 Staff Development
The pharmacist must interact with colleagues both within the pharmacy department
and outside to convey information gained both within the hospital and externally. For
example, the pharmacist must:
Relay information learnt at continuing education sessions, training sessions,
conferences, etc.;
Contribute to departmental training sessions, journal clubs, etc.;
Relay patient safety issues;
Contribute to staff meetings;
Share with colleagues new information / journal articles if relevant.
TEAMWORK
It is important for the pharmacist to be a team player. This includes:
Understanding the roles and responsibilities of team members and how the team
works;
Respecting the skills and contributions of colleagues and directly managed staff;
Recognising one’s own limitations within the team.
3.12 Pharmacy Team
Within the pharmacy team, the pharmacist should be expected to:
Be a committed member of the team;
Understand the roles of all other team members;
Understand individuals’ strengths and weaknesses;
Page 46 of 48
Identify when team members need support and provide it;
Establish good working relationships with all colleagues;
Accept responsibility for own work (and for those in training where appropriate);
Give and receive constructive criticism;
Work efficiently in the team;
Know when to ask for help;
Share and / or hand over information to avoid duplication of work by team
members.
3.13 Multidisciplinary Team
The pharmacist should recognise the roles and skills of other healthcare
professionals and seek to establish cooperative working relationships with
colleagues, based on an understanding of and respect for each other’s roles.
Page 47 of 48
Page 48 of 48
AT THE END OF THE ASSESSMENT PERIOD
At the end of the GLF assessment period, a summary sheet (Appendix 6) should be
completed to highlight the pharmacist’s strengths, areas for development and the
objectives to be achieved for the next assessment.
Appendix 1 – The General Level Framework
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
2
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
PATIENT CONSULTATION
a b a b a b a b 1.1 Opening the consultation
CONSISTENTLY provides clear introduction to the consultation c d
USUALLY provides clear introduction to the consultation c d
SOMETIMES provides clear introduction to the consultation c d
RARELY provides clear introduction to the consultation c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 1.2 Questioning CONSISTENTLY uses appropriate questioning to obtain relevant information from patient
c d
USUALLY uses appropriate questioning to obtain relevant information from patient c d
SOMETIMES uses appropriate questioning to obtain relevant information from patient
c d
RARELY use appropriate questioning to obtain relevant information from patient c d
Comments GATHERING INFORMATION
a b a b a b a b 1.3 Allergies CONSISTENTLY confirms or documents accurate and comprehensive allergy and/or adverse drug reaction history
c d
USUALLY confirms or documents accurate and comprehensive allergy and/or adverse drug reaction history
c d
SOMETIMES confirms or documents accurate and comprehensive allergy and/or adverse drug reaction history
c d
RARELY confirms or documents accurate and comprehensive allergy and/or adverse drug reaction history
c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 1.4 Relevant patient background
CONSISTENTLY retrieves all relevant medical information from medical, nursing and electronic records
c d
USUALLY retrieves all relevant medical information from medical, nursing and electronic records
c d
SOMETIMES retrieves all relevant medical information from medical, nursing and electronic records
c d
RARELY retrieve all relevant medical information from medical, nursing and electronic records
c d
Comments
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY takes or
checks for an accurate and comprehensive medication history where appropriate
c d
USUALLY takes or checks for an accurate and comprehensive medication history where appropriate
c d
SOMETIMES takes or checks for an accurate and comprehensive medication history where appropriate
c d
RARELY takes or checks for an accurate and comprehensive medication history where appropriate
c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY reconciles medication history with current medication prescribed, medical history and current condition where appropriate (including reconciling transcribed IMRs and discharge prescriptions)
c d
USUALLY reconciles medication history with current medication prescribed, medical history and current condition where appropriate (including reconciling transcribed IMRs and discharge prescriptions)
c d
SOMETIMES reconciles medication history with current medication prescribed, medical history and current condition where appropriate (including reconciling transcribed IMRs and discharge prescriptions)
c d
RARELY reconciles medication history with current medication prescribed, medical history and current condition where appropriate (including reconciling transcribed IMRs and discharge prescriptions)
c d
a b a b a b a b
1.5 Medication reconciliation
CONSISTENTLY consults appropriately on any inconsistencies
c d
USUALLY consults appropriately on any inconsistencies
c d
SOMETIMES consults appropriately on any inconsistencies
c d
RARELY consults appropriately on any inconsistencies
c d
Comments PROVISION OF MEDICATION
a b a b a b a b 1.6 Prescription is unambiguous
CONSISTENTLY ensures clarity of the prescription
c d
USUALLY ensures clarity of the prescription
c d
SOMETIMES ensures clarity of the prescription
c d
RARELY ensures clarity of the prescription
c d Comments
a b a b a b a b 1.7 Prescription is legal
CONSISTENTLY ensures legality of prescription c d
USUALLY ensures legality of prescription c d
SOMETIMES ensures legality of prescription c d
RARELY ensures legality of prescription c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 1.8 Labeling of the medicine
The label on the dispensed medicine CONSISTENTLY includes required information
c d
The label on the dispensed medicine USUALLY includes required information
c d
The label on the dispensed medicine SOMETIMES includes required information
c d
The label on the dispensed medicine RARELY includes required information
c d
Comments
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
3
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY ensures availability of medication (Example: procedure to obtain exemption drugs)
c d
USUALLY ensures availability of medication (Example: procedure to obtain exemption drugs)
c d
SOMETIMES ensures availability of medication (Example: procedure to obtain exemption drugs)
c d
RARELY ensures availability of medication (Example: procedure to obtain exemption drugs)
c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY ensures that the right medication is supplied to the right patient with the right labeling
c d
USUALLY ensures that the right medication is supplied to the right patient with the right labeling
c d
SOMETIMES ensures that the right medication is supplied to the right patient with the right labeling
c d
RARELY ensures that the right medication is supplied to the right patient with the right labeling
c d
a b a b a b a b
1.9 Medication supply
CONSISTENTLY ensures the supply of the drug is documented
c d
USUALLY ensures the supply of the drug is documented
c d
SOMETIMES ensures the supply of the drug is documented
c d
RARELY ensures the supply of the drug is documented
c d
Comments DRUG SPECIFIC ISSUES Check for the 8 ‘Rs’ : Right patient, medication, dose, route, time and frequency, duration, diluent, rate of infusion
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY ensures need for the drug c d
USUALLY ensures need for the drug c d
SOMETIMES ensures need for the drug c d
RARELY ensures need for the drug c d
a b a b a b a b
1.10 Drug selection
CONSISTENTLY ensures cost-effectiveness of medication use
c d
USUALLY ensures cost-effectiveness of medication use
c d
SOMETIMES ensures cost-effectiveness of medication use
c d
RARELY ensures cost-effectiveness of medication use
c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 1.11 Selection of formulation, concentration, rate and diluent
CONSISTENTLY ensures appropriate formulation and dose equivalents taken into account. Appropriate information given for concentration/rate/diluent of parenteral drugs
c d
USUALLY ensures appropriate formulation and dose equivalents taken into account. Appropriate information given for concentration/rate/diluent of parenteral drugs
c d
SOMETIMES ensures appropriate formulation and dose equivalents taken into account. Appropriate information given for concentration/rate/diluent of parenteral drugs
c d
RARELY ensures appropriate formulation and dose equivalents taken into account. Appropriate information given for concentration/rate/diluent of parenteral drugs
c d
Comments
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
4
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
a b a b a b a b 1.12 Checking of dose, frequency, timing, route and duration
CONSISTENTLY checks that patient has received the correct dose and frequency, at the correct time via most appropriate route for the right duration
c d
USUALLY checks that patient has received the correct dose and frequency, at the correct time via most appropriate route for the right duration
c d
SOMETIMES checks that patient has received the correct dose and frequency, at the correct time via most appropriate route for the right duration
c d
RARELY checks that patient has received the correct dose and frequency, at the correct time via most appropriate route for the right duration
c d
Comments PATIENT EDUCATION
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY ensures appropriate oral/written information is provided to patient
c d
USUALLY ensures appropriate oral/written information is provided to patient.
c d
SOMETIMES ensures appropriate oral/written information is provided to patient.
c d
RARELY ensures appropriate oral/written information is provided to patient. c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY ensures advice given on non-pharmacological therapy when appropriate
c d
USUALLY ensures advice given on non-pharmacological therapy when appropriate c d
SOMETIMES ensures advice given on non-pharmacological therapy when appropriate c d
RARELY ensures advice given on non-pharmacological therapy when appropriate c d
a b a b a b a b
1.13 Patient is counseled on medication
CONSISTENTLY assesses patient’s comprehension of information
c d
USUALLY assesses patient’s comprehension of information c d
SOMETIMES assesses patient’s comprehension of information
c d
RARELY assesses patient’s comprehension of information c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 1.14 Compliance assessment
CONSISTENTLY identifies patients with compliance issues and manages appropriately (Example: literacy, visual impairment, disability, cognition/memory)
c d
USUALLY identifies patients with compliance issues and manages appropriately (Example: literacy, visual impairment, disability, cognition/memory)
c d
SOMETIMES identifies patients with compliance issues and manages appropriately (Example: literacy, visual impairment, disability, cognition/memory)
c d
RARELY identifies patients with compliance issues and manages appropriately. (Example: literacy, visual impairment, disability, cognition/memory)
c d
Comments
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
5
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
6
1. Delivery of Patient Care Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
a b a b a b a b 1.15 Need for information identified
CONSISTENTLY identifies and responds appropriately to patient’s need for more information
c d
USUALLY identifies and responds appropriately to patient’s need for more information
c d
SOMETIMES identifies and responds appropriately to patient’s need for more information
c d
RARELY identifies and responds appropriately to patient’s need for more information
c d
Comments RISK MANAGEMENT & SERVICE IMPROVEMENT
a b a b a b a b 1.16 Risk
management CONSISTENTLY documents medication errors c d
USUALLY documents medication errors c d
SOMETIMES documents medication errors c d
RARELY documents medication errors c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 1.17 Service improvement
CONSISTENTLY looks to improve quality of service
c d
USUALLY looks to improve quality of service c d
SOMETIMES looks to improve quality of service c d
RARELY looks to improve quality of service c d
Comments
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
7
2. Problem Solving Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY identifies drug-drug interactions (including complementary medicines)
c d
USUALLY identifies drug-drug interactions (including complementary medicines) c d
SOMETIMES identifies drug-drug interactions (including complementary medicines) c d
RARELY identifies drug-drug interactions (including complementary medicines) c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY identifies drug-related problems in special patient groups (Example: Use of warfarin in an alcoholic creates unwarranted level of risk, tube feeding, paediatric/elderly, G6PD)
c d
USUALLY identifies drug-related problems in special patient groups (Example: Use of warfarin in an alcoholic creates unwarranted level of risk, tube feeding, paediatric/elderly, G6PD)
c d
SOMETIMES identifies drug-related problems in special patient groups (Example: Use of warfarin in an alcoholic creates unwarranted level of risk, tube feeding, paediatric/elderly, G6PD)
c d
RARELY identifies drug-related problems in special patient groups (Example: Use of warfarin in an alcoholic creates unwarranted level of risk, tube feeding, paediatric/elderly, G6PD)
c d
a b a b a b a b
2.1 Identification of drug-related problems
CONSISTENTLY identifies drug-disease interactions (Example: NSAID in HF)
c d
USUALLY identifies drug-disease interactions (Example: NSAID in HF)
c d
SOMETIMES identifies drug-disease interactions. (Example: NSAID in HF)
c d
RARELY identifies drug-disease interactions (Example: NSAID in HF)
c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 2.2 Prioritization CONSISTENTLY prioritizes drug-related problems appropriately
c cd
USUALLY prioritizes drug-related problems appropriately d
SOMETIMES prioritizes drug-related problems appropriately c d
RARELY prioritizes drug-related problems appropriately c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 2.3 Consultation or referral
CONSISTENTLY understands own limitations, considers most appropriate referral point, refers in a logical, clear and concise manner
c d
USUALLY understands own limitations, considers most appropriate referral point, refers in a logical, clear and concise manner
c d
SOMETIMES understands own limitations, considers most appropriate referral point, refers in a logical, clear and concise manner
c d
RARELY understands own limitations, considers most appropriate referral point, refers in a logical, clear and concise manner
c d
Comments
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
8
2. Problem Solving Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4 month facilitated assessment c = 8 month facilitated assessment d = 12 month facilitated assessment
KNOWLEDGE
a b a b a b a b 2.4 Pathophysiology
CONSISTENTLY able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) the underlying pathophysiology of disease
c d
USUALLY able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) the underlying pathophysiology of disease
c d
SOMETIMES able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) the underlying pathophysiology of disease
c d
RARELY able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) the underlying pathophysiology of disease
c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 2.5 Pharmacology CONSISTENTLY able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) how drugs work
c d
USUALLY able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) how drugs work
c d
SOMETIMES able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) how drugs work
c d
RARELY able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) how drugs work
c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 2.6 Side-effects and monitoring
CONSISTENTLY able to describe major side-effects and monitoring parameters
c cd
USUALLY able to describe major side-effects and monitoring parameters
d
SOMETIMES able to describe major side-effects and monitoring parameters
c d
RARELY able to describe major side-effects and monitoring parameters
c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 2.7 Interactions (drug/disease/ special patient groups)
CONSISTENTLY able to describe mechanisms of interactions c d
USUALLY able to describe mechanisms of interactions
c d
SOMETIMES able to describe mechanisms of interactions
c d
RARELY able to describe mechanisms of interactions
c d
Comments
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
2. Problem Solving Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
ANALYSIS & RECOMENDATIONS
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY able to access recent clinical guidelines and/or relevant references
c d
USUALLY able to access recent clinical guidelines and/or relevant references c d
SOMETIMES able to access recent clinical guidelines and/or relevant references c d
RARELY able to access recent clinical guidelines and/or relevant references c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY able to analyze information and critically appraise literature c d
USUALLY able to analyze information and critically appraise literature c d
SOMETIMES able to analyze information and critically appraise literature c d
RARELY able to analyze information and critically appraise literature c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY able to identify evidence gaps
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
9
c d
USUALLY able to identify evidence gaps
c d
SOMETIMES able to identify evidence gaps
c d
RARELY able to identify evidence gaps
c d
a b a b a b a b
2.8 Use of guidelines and evidence
CONSISTENTLY demonstrates clear decision making
c d
USUALLY demonstrates clear decision making c d
SOMETIMES demonstrates clear decision making c d
RARELY demonstrates clear decision making c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY provides accurate information c d
USUALLY provides accurate information c d
SOMETIMES provides accurate information c d
RARELY provides accurate information c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY provides relevant information c d
USUALLY provides relevant information c d
SOMETIMES provides relevant information c d
RARELY provides relevant information c d
a b a b a b a b
2.9 Information provision to other healthcare professionals
CONSISTENTLY provides timely information c d
USUALLY provides timely information c d
SOMETIMES provides timely information c d
RARELY provides timely information c d
Comments
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
2. Problem Solving Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
a b a b a b a b 2.10 Documentation of drug-related problems
CONSISTENTLY documents drug-related problems using appropriate styles and methods (Example: intervention forms, case notes, prescriptions, ADR reports)
c d
USUALLY documents drug-related problems using appropriate styles and methods (Example: intervention forms, case notes, prescriptions, ADR reports)
c d
SOMETIMES documents drug-related problems using appropriate styles and methods (Example: intervention forms, case notes, prescriptions, ADR reports)
c d
RARELY documents drug-related problems using appropriate styles and methods. (Example: intervention forms, case notes, prescriptions, ADR reports)
c d
Comments FOLLOW UP
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY L monitors drug therapy appropriately. (Example: TDM, high risk drugs/diseases/special patient groups)
c d
USUALLY monitors drug therapy appropriately. (Example: TDM, high risk drugs/diseases/special patient groups)
c d
SOMETIMES monitors drug therapy appropriately. (Example: TDM, high risk drugs/diseases/special patient groups)
c d
RARELY monitors drug therapy appropriately. (Example: TDM, high risk drugs/diseases/special patient groups)
c d
a b a b a b a b
2.11 Monitoring & problem resolution
CONSISTENTLY ensures drug-related problems are resolved (including following up interventions)
c d
USUALLY ensures drug-related problems are resolved (including following up interventions)
c d
SOMETIMES ensures drug-related problems are resolved (including following up interventions)
c d
RARELY ensures drug-related problems are resolved (including following up interventions)
c d
Comments
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
10
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
11
3. Professional Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
ORGANIZATION
a b a b a b a b 3.1 Prioritization CONSISTENTLY prioritizes work well c cd
USUALLY prioritizes work well d
SOMETIMES prioritizes work well c d
RARELY prioritizes work well c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 3.2 Punctuality CONSISTENTLY punctual c d
USUALLY punctual c d
SOMETIMES punctual c d
RARELY punctual c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 3.3 Time management
CONSISTENTLY uses time efficiently resulting in tasks being completed within agreed deadlines
c d
USUALLY uses time efficiently resulting in tasks being completed within agreed deadlines
c d
SOMETIMES uses time efficiently resulting in tasks being completed within agreed deadlines
c d
RARELY uses time efficiently resulting in tasks being completed within agreed deadlines
c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 3.4 Initiative CONSISTENTLY demonstrates appropriate initiative when required
c d
USUALLY demonstrates appropriate initiative when required
c d
SOMETIMES demonstrates appropriate initiative when required
c d
RARELY demonstrates appropriate initiative when required
c d
Comments
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
12
3. Professional Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
PROFESSIONALISM
a b a b a b a b 3.5 Professional code of ethics
CONSISTENTLY practices within Code of Ethics c d
USUALLY practices within Code of Ethics c d
SOMETIMES practices within Code of Ethics c d
RARELY practices within Code of Ethics c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 3.6 Confidentiality CONSISTENTLY maintains confidentiality c d
USUALLY maintains confidentiality c cd
SOMETIMES maintains confidentiality c d
RARELY maintains confidentiality d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 3.7 Confidence CONSISTENTLY demonstrates confidence, inspires confidence in others c d
USUALLY demonstrates confidence, inspires confidence in others c d
SOMETIMES demonstrates confidence, inspires confidence in others c d
RARELY demonstrates confidence, inspires confidence in others c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b 3.8 Responsibility CONSISTENTLY takes responsibility for own actions and for patient care c d
USUALLY takes responsibility for own actions and for patient care c d
SOMETIMES takes responsibility for own actions and for patient care c d
RARELY takes responsibility for own actions and for patient care c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b Can CONSISTENTLY describe the structure and values of employing organization
c d
Can USUALLY describe the structure and values of employing organization c d
Can SOMETIMES describe the structure and values of employing organization c d
Can RARELY describe the structure and values of employing organization c d
a b a b a b a b
3.9 Organizational
CONSISTENTLY uses relevant and up to date procedures for practice c d
USUALLY uses relevant and up to date procedures for practice c d
SOMETIMES uses relevant and up to date procedures for practice c d
RARELY use relevant and up to date procedures for practice
c d
Comments
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
13
3. Professional Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
COMMUNICATION SKILLS
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY ensures communication with patients is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
USUALLY ensures communication with patients is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
SOMETIMES ensures communication with patients is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
RARELY ensures communication with patients is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY ensures communication with prescribers is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
USUALLY ensures communication with prescribers is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
SOMETIMES ensures communication with prescribers is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
RARELY ensures communication with prescribers is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
a b a b a b a b
3.10 Communication
CONSISTENTLY ensures communication with nursing staff and other members of the health care team is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
USUALLY ensures communication with nursing staff and other members of the health care team is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
SOMETIMES ensures communication with nursing staff and other members of the health care team is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
RARELY ensures communication with nursing staff and other members of the health care team is clear, precise and appropriate
c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY willing to share learning experiences and give feedback/guidance to support staff development
c d
USUALLY willing to share learning experiences and give feedback/guidance to support staff development
c d
SOMETIMES willing to share learning experiences and give feedback/guidance to support staff development
c d
RARELY willing to share learning experiences and give feedback/guidance to support staff development
c d
a b a b a b a b
3.11 Staff development
CONSISTENTLY active in educating and training healthcare professionals c d
USUALLY active in educating and training healthcare professionals c d
SOMETIMES active in educating and training healthcare professionals c d
RARELY active in educating and training healthcare professionals c d
Comments
A Competency Framework for Pharmacy Practitioners General Level Pharmacist Name: ___________________ Date of assessment: Baseline/end of 1st rotation/ end of 2nd rotation/ end of 3rd rotation/end of 4th rotation
UNABLE TO ASSESS ( UA)
CONSISTENTLY (100 - 85%) USUALLY (84 - 51%) SOMETIMES (50 - 21%) RARELY (<20%)
Record as UA under comments
Demonstrates the expected standard of practice with very rare lapses
Implies standard practice with occasional lapses
Much more haphazard than ‘usually’
Very rarely meets the standard expected. No logical thought process appears to apply
© 2004 CoDEG General Level Framework (GLF) used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK, and the Medicines Safety Unit, Queensland, Australia. Adapted for use in Singapore General Hospital by Victoria Coleman and Camilla Wong, April 2009. Updated in Jan 2010.
14
3. Professional Competencies a = baseline facilitated assessment b = 4/6 month facilitated assessment c = 8/12 month facilitated assessment d = 12/18 month facilitated assessment
TEAM WORK
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY recognizes the value of team members c d
USUALLY recognizes the value of team members c d
SOMETIMES recognizes the value of team members c d
RARELY recognizes the value of team members c d
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY works effectively as part of a team c d
USUALLY works effectively as part of a team c d
SOMETIMES works effectively as part of a team c d
RARELY works effectively as part of a team c d
a b a b a b a b
3.12 Pharmacy team
CONSISTENTLY passes on relevant information c d
USUALLY passes on relevant information c d
SOMETIMES passes on relevant information c d
RARELY passes on relevant information c d
Comments
a b a b a b a b CONSISTENTLY recognizes value of other team members c cd
USUALLY recognizes value of other team members d
SOMETIMES recognizes value of other team members c d
RARELY recognizes value of other team members c d
a b a b a b a b
3.13 Multidisciplinary team CONSISTENTLY works
effectively as part of a team c d USUALLY works effectively as part of a team c d
SOMETIMES works effectively as part of a team c d
RARELY works effectively as part of a team c d
Comments
Appendix 2 – GLF Mapping
General Level Framework Mapping
1. DELIVERY OF PATIENT CARE COMPETENCIES
C=CONSISTENTLY; U=USUALLY; S=SOMETIMES; R=RARELY; C = Clinical track; R = Research track; P = Professional track
*Also to fulfil minimum criteria on ALF depending on the track to pursue – see point 4 2
Suggested Timeframe
Assessment Phase
End Yr1 End Yr2
3a/Clinical Gateway
End Yr3*
Prerequisite to Senior/ Research Gateway
GLF Behaviour Descriptor Minimum Performance Level PATIENT CONSULTATION 1.1 Opening the consultation
Provides clear introduction to the consultation C C C
1.2 Questioning Uses appropriate questioning to obtain relevant information from patient
U C C
GATHERING INFORMATION 1.3 Allergies Confirms or documents accurate and
comprehensive allergy and/or adverse drug reaction history
C C C
1.4 Relevant patient background
Retrieves all relevant medical information from medical, nursing and electronic records
U C C
Takes or checks for an accurate and comprehensive medication history where appropriate
C C C
Reconciles medication history with current medication prescribed, medical history and current condition where appropriate (including reconciling transcribed IMRs and discharge prescriptions)
U C C
1.5 Medication reconciliation
Consults appropriately on any inconsistencies C C C PROVISION OF MEDICATION 1.6 Prescription is unambiguous
Ensures the clarity of the prescription C C C
1.7 Prescription is legal
Ensures legality of prescription C C C
1.8 Labelling of the medicine
The label on the dispensed medicine includes required information
C C C
Ensures availability of medication (Example: procedure to obtain exemption drugs)
C C C
Ensures that the right medication is supplied to the right patient with the right labelling
C C C
1.9 Medication supply
The supply of the drug is documented C C C DRUG SPECIFIC ISSUES
Ensures need for the drug U C C 1.10 Drug selection Ensures cost-effectiveness of medication use S U C
1.11 Selection of formulation, concentration, rate and diluent
Ensures appropriate formulation and dose equivalents taken into account. Appropriate information given for concentration/rate/diluent of parenteral drugs
C C C
1.12 Checking of dose, frequency, timing, route and duration
Checks that patient has received the correct dose and frequency, at the correct time via most appropriate route for the right duration
C C C
PATIENT EDUCATION Ensures appropriate oral/written information is provided to patient
C C C
Ensures advice given on non-pharmacological therapy when appropriate
S U C
1.13 Patient is counselled on medication
Assesses patient’s comprehension of information
U C C
1.14 Compliance assessment
Identifies patients with compliance issues and manages appropriately. (Example: literacy, visual impairment, disability, cognition/memory).
S U C
1.15 Need for information identified
Identifies and responds appropriately to patient’s need for more information
S U C
RISK MANAGEMENT& SERVICE IMPROVEMENT 1.16 Risk management
Documents medication errors C C C
1.17 Service improvement
Looks to improve quality of service S U C
General Level Framework Mapping
2. PROBLEM SOLVING COMPETENCIES
ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS Able to access recent clinical guidelines and/or relevant references
U U/CC C
Able to analyse information and critically appraise literature
U U/CC C
Able to identify evidence gaps U U U/CR
2.8 Use of guidelines and evidence
Demonstrates clear decision making U U/CC C Provides accurate information C C C Provides relevant information U U/CC C
2.9 Information provision to other healthcare professionals Provides timely information U C C 2.10 Documentation of drug-related problems
Documents drug-related problems using appropriate styles and methods. Example: intervention forms, case notes, prescriptions, ADR reports
C C C
FOLLOW UP Monitors drug therapy appropriately. Example: TDM, high risk drugs/diseases/special patient groups
U U/CC C 2.11 Monitoring & problem resolution
Ensures drug-related problems are resolved (including following up interventions)
C C C
Suggested Timeframe
Assessment Phase
End Yr1 End Yr2
3a/Clinical Gateway
End Yr3*
Prerequisite to Senior/ Research Gateway
GLF Behaviour Descriptor Minimum Performance Level PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
Identifies drug-drug interactions (including complementary medicines)
U U/CC C
Identifies drug-related problems in special patient groups. Example: Use of warfarin in an alcoholic creates unwarranted level of risk, tube feeding, paediatric/elderly, G6PD.
U U/CC C
2.1 Identification of drug-related problems
Identifies drug-disease interactions. Example: NSAID in HF
U U/CC C
2.2 Prioritization Prioritizes drug-related problems appropriately U U/CC C 2.3 Consultation or referral
Understands own limitations, considers most appropriate referral point, refers in a logical, clear and concise manner
U C C
KNOWLEDGE 2.4 Pathophysiology Able to discuss (or able to access information
and use this to describe) the underlying pathophysiology of disease.
U U/CC C
2.5 Pharmacology Able to discuss (or able to access information and use this to describe) how drugs work
U U/CC C
2.6 Side-effects and monitoring
Able to describe major side-effects and monitoring parameters
U U/CC C
2.7 Interactions (drug/disease/ special patient groups)
Able to describe mechanisms of interactions U U/CC C
C=CONSISTENTLY; U=USUALLY; S=SOMETIMES; R=RARELY; C = Clinical track; R = Research track; P = Professional track
*Also to fulfil minimum criteria on ALF depending on the track to pursue – see point 4 3
General Level Framework Mapping
C=CONSISTENTLY; U=USUALLY; S=SOMETIMES; R=RARELY; C = Clinical track; R = Research track; P = Professional track
*Also to fulfil minimum criteria on ALF depending on the track to pursue – see point 4 4
3. PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES
Suggested Timeframe
Assessment Phase
End Yr1 End Yr2
3a/Clinical Gateway
End Yr3*
Prerequisite to Senior/
Research Gateway
GLF Behaviour Descriptor Minimum Performance Level ORGANISATION 3.1 Prioritization Prioritizes work well S U C 3.2 Punctuality Punctual C C C 3.3 Time management
Uses time efficiently resulting in tasks being completed within agreed deadlines
S U C
3.4 Initiative Demonstrates appropriate initiative when required
S U C
PROFESSIONALISM 3.5 Professional code of ethics
Practices within Code of Ethics C C C
3.6 Confidentiality Maintains confidentiality C C C 3.7 Confidence Demonstrates confidence, inspires confidence
in others S U C
3.8 Responsibility Takes responsibility for own actions and for patient care
C C C
Describe the structure and values of employing organization
C C C 3.9 Organizational
Uses relevant and up to date procedures for practice
C C C
COMMUNICATION SKILLS Ensures communication with patients is clear, precise and appropriate
U C C
Ensures communication with prescribers is clear, precise and appropriate
U C C
3.10 Communication
Ensures communication with nursing staff and other members of the health care team is clear, precise and appropriate
U C C
Willing to share learning experiences and give feedback/guidance to support staff development
U C C 3.11 Staff development
Active in educating and training healthcare professionals
S U C
TEAM WORK Recognizes the value of team members U C C Works effectively as part of a team U C C
3.12 Pharmacy team
Passes on relevant information U C C Recognizes value of other team members U C C 3.13
Multidisciplinary team
Works effectively as part of a team S C C
Suggested Timeframe
Assessment Phase
End Yr1 End Yr2
3a/Clinical Gateway
End Yr3*
Prerequisite to Senior/
Research Gateway
4. Overlap of ALF Competencies
Suggested Timeframe End Yr1 End Yr2
3a/Clinical Gateway
End Yr3* Prerequisite to Senior/ Research Gateway
End Yr4 Senior/ Research
Gateway
Minimum ALF Competency
to be Attained
N/A N/A FOUNDATION Level in Building Working Relationships
plus FOUNDATION Level in ONE of: ManagementP Expert Professional PracticeC Research & EvaluationR Depending on track to pursue
See ALF Mapping
Document
Appendix 3 – Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) Form
© 2007 CoDEG Mini-CEX used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK. Adapted for use in Singapore by Victoria Coleman, Holly Lee Ho-Yan and Camilla Wong, April 2009.
Mini-clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) This tool is designed to be used on the ward/in the clinic, to assess the pharmacist’s provision of pharmaceutical care to new patients. The purpose is to assess the thought process and overall performance of the GLF pharmacist, not necessarily the depth of their clinical knowledge. Minimum frequency requirement: ONE every 4 months Estimated time required: 20 mins (15mins for assessment, 5 mins for feedback)
Pharmacist name:
Clinical Area: Topic: Date: Please grade the following areas using the scale below:
Significantly below
Below
Borderline
Meets expectations
Above
Significantly above
Not observed
Delivery of Patient Care Patient consultation
Retrieves relevant medical/drug information (including allergies)
Evaluates the appropriateness of drug selection
Appropriate patient education given
Professionalism
Problem Solving Identifies drug-related problems
Demonstrates required drug-related knowledge
Analyzes information and makes appropriate recommendations
Overall clinical care
© 2007 CoDEG Mini-CEX used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK. Adapted for use in Singapore by Victoria Coleman, Holly Lee Ho-Yan and Camilla Wong, April 2009.
Anything especially good? Suggestions for development
Agreed action (Be specific and include time frame)
Follow up (To be completed at a later date by next preceptor) Action completed? Comments (if any)
Reviewer
Name: Signature: Date:
Trainee satisfaction with performance: (please circle)
Not at all Highly 1 2 3 4 5
Assessor satisfaction with overall performance of trainee: (please circle)
Not at all Highly 1 2 3 4 5
Assessor name: ________________________________ Assessor signature: _____________________________ Date: ________
Appendix 4 - Case Based Discussion (CbD) Form
Case Based Discussion (CBD) This tool is designed to assess clinical decision-making and the application or use of pharmaceutical knowledge in a patient they have managed. It may be used during clinical rounds or formal case presentations, where the pharmacist has had time to prepare and research the case. Minimum frequency requirement: ONE every 4 months Estimated time required: 20 mins (15mins for assessment, 5 mins for feedback)
Pharmacist name:
Clinical Area: Topic:
Date:
Please grade the following areas using the scale below:
Significantly below
Below
Borderline
Meets expectations
Above
Significantly above
Not observed
(please tick if unable to comment)
Identification of drug-related problems
Analysis and recommendations
Follow up and monitoring
Professionalism
Overall clinical judgment
© 2007 CoDEG CBD used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK. Adapted for use in Singapore by Victoria Coleman, Holly Lee Ho-Yan and Camilla Wong, April 2009.
2
© 2007 CoDEG CBD used with permission from the Competency Development and Evaluation Group (CoDEG), South East England, UK. Adapted for use in Singapore by Victoria Coleman, Holly Lee Ho-Yan and Camilla Wong, April 2009.
3
Anything especially good? Suggestions for development
Agreed action Follow up (To be completed at a later date by next preceptor) Action completed? Comments (if any)
Reviewer
Name: Signature: Date:
Trainee satisfaction with performance: (please circle)
Not at all Highly 1 2 3 4 5
Assessor satisfaction with overall performance of trainee: (please circle)
Not at all Highly 1 2 3 4 5
Assessor name: ________________________________ Assessor signature: _____________________________ Date: ________
Appendix 5A: Medication Review/ Dispensing Observation for GLF Pharmacist
Pharmacist: Ward covered: Clinical Group (CG): Rotation period:
Date of Ward Visit: 1.__________________ Date of Ward Visit 2._________________ Note: if more ward observations performed, please record in another new document.
1. Medication Review Activities during Medication Review Round
Comments / Remarks (Please specify the date)
Suggestions for Development
Visit 1
Visit 1 Retrieves relevant medical / drug information (including allergies)
Demonstrates required drug-related knowledge
Evaluates the appropriateness of drug selection
Identifies drug-related problems
Analyses information and makes appropriate recommendations
Able to prioritise tasks and handle urgent and important intervention appropriately
Appropriate administration instruction given to patient / SN / Doctor
Communicate clearly and effectively with other healthcare providers (doctors, nurses etc
Visit 2
Visit 2
2. Dispensing (Bedside / Counter Dispensing) Activities during Prescriptions Dispensing
Comments / Remarks (Please specify the date)
Suggestions for Development
Visit 1
Visit 1 Patient consultation
Retrieves relevant medical/drug information (including allergies)
Demonstrates required drug-related knowledge
Evaluates the appropriateness of drug selection
Appropriate patient education given
Analyses information and makes appropriate recommendations
Able to perform intervention with respective doctors appropriately
Identifies potential compliance issue
Visit 2
Visit 2
Summary Aspects Observed/ Findings Feedback/ Suggested
Development Clinical knowledge
Clinical skills
Decision making (prioritisation, counselling arrangement, handling enquiries etc)
Communication
Confidence level
Overall
Documented by CG Leader: _____________ Signature: _____________ Date:_________
Appendix 5B: Dispensing Observation for GLF Pharmacist
Pharmacist: Date: Clinical Group (CG): Rotation period:
Note: This assessment will be conducted for ALL pharmacists at the end of each rotation. However, for new pharmacists joining the department, a baseline assessment will be completed.
1. Dispensing (Counter Dispensing) Activities during Prescriptions Dispensing
Comments / Remarks (Please specify the date)
Suggestions for Development
Patient consultation
Retrieves relevant medical/drug information (including allergies)
Demonstrates required drug-related knowledge
Evaluates the appropriateness of drug selection
Appropriate patient education given
Analyses information and makes appropriate recommendations
Able to perform intervention with respective doctors appropriately
Identifies potential compliance issue
Billing (optional)
Summary Aspects Observed/ Findings Feedback/ Suggested
Development
Clinical knowledge
Clinical skills
Decision making (prioritisation, counselling
arrangement, handling enquiries
etc)
Communication
Confidence level
Overall
Documented by CG Leader: _____________ Signature: _____________ Date:_________
Appendix 6 - GLF Assessment Summary Pharmacist’s name: Rotation/clinical area: Dates that assessment covers:
Anything especially good? Suggestions for development?
Overall impression: (please circle)
Poor Borderline Satisfactory Good Very good
Assessor Name: Assessor Signature: Pharmacist Signature: Date:
Action Completed Clinical Objectives to be Achieved (Be specific e.g. case presentation on HF) (To be filled by next CG leaders)
Date Comment
Assessor Name: Assessor Signature: Pharmacist Signature: Date: