the future of mobility & carsharing
TRANSCRIPT
The Future of Mobility & Carsharing Susan Shaheen, Ph.D
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Overview
§ Impacts § Mul>-‐Modal Integra>on § Data Sharing & Privacy § Longer-‐Term Trends § Summary
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015 Mar:n et al. 2010
2008 North American Carsharing Survey: Key Findings
§ Between 9 to 13 vehicles removed, including postponed purchase
§ 4 to 6 vehicles/carsharing vehicle sold due to carsharing
§ 25% sell a vehicle; 25% postpone purchases
§ 27 -‐ 43% VMT/VKT reduc:on per year, considering vehicles sold and purchases postponed
§ More users increased overall public transit and non-‐motorized modal use (including bus, rail, walking, and carpooling) than decreased it
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015 Mar:n et al. 2010
2008 North American Carsharing Survey: Key Findings
§ Reduc:on of 0.58-‐0.84 metric tons of GHG emissions per year for one household (mean observed and full impact)
§ 34% -‐ 41% reduc:on of GHG emissions per year for one household.
§ $154 -‐ $435 monthly household savings per U.S. member aRer joining carsharing
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Mul>-‐Modal Integra>on § Co-‐loca>ng carsharing with public transit § Bike racks § Joint fare cards § Standardized mobile payment methods
§ Near field communica>ons (NFC) § Bluetooth low energy (BLE)
§ Smartphone apps § Route planners and aggregators
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Designing for Mul>-‐Modality
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Source: Toole Design & Boston Complete Streets
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Designing for Mul>-‐Modality
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Source: Toole Design & Boston Complete Streets
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Integra>on With Other Shared Modes
§ Bikesharing § Ridesharing/carpooling § ShuWles & flexible transit services § Public transporta>on § Smart parking
§ Automated Vehicles
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Data Sharing & Privacy
§ Need for: § Data standards § Industry-‐wide data sharing § Consumer data protec>on § Proprietary data protec>on
With operator understanding, the en2re industry wins when we can measure aggregate carsharing size and impacts to advance public policy
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Common Ground
§ Challenges such as taxa>on, insurance, and parking impact en>re industry
§ Solu>ons can be achieved through increased collabora>on and research
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Longer-‐Term Trends § Worldwide growth
§ Market diversifica>on and new service models
§ Commercial mainstreaming (e.g., college, low-‐income)
§ Blurring lines between hourly car rentals and carsharing § Increased use of virtual storefronts in tradi>onal car rentals § Increased compe>>on from emerging modes + rise of sharing economy
§ Convergence of sharing with EVs and AVs an>cipated
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Summary § Numerous documented carsharing benefits § Mul:-‐modal integra:on con:nues to develop (virtual & physical)
§ Need for data sharing & privacy § Longer-‐term trends unfolding including:
§ Mainstreaming § Diversifica:on of carsharing service § Blurring lines btw. carsharing + car rental § Ecosystem compe::on § EV + AV convergence with sharing
© UC Berkeley, 2015
© UC Berkeley, 2015
Acknowledgements
§ Mineta Transporta>on Ins>tute, San Jose State University
§ California Department of Transporta>on
§ Adam Cohen, Elliot Mar>n, Nelson Chan, and MaW Christensen, TSRC, UC Berkeley
§ Special thanks to the worldwide shared mobility operators and experts who make our research possible including Timothy Papandreou and Russell Meddin
© UC Berkeley, 2015
www.tsrc.berkeley.edu
Email: [email protected]
Twi_er: SusanShaheen1