the fabrication of a maxillary and a mandibular prosthesis

16
Cape Peninsula University of Technology Digital Knowledge Tygerberg Dental Sciences Faculty of Health & Wellness Sciences 1-1-2007 The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis to Restore the Natural Dentition of a Patient Elwin Burger Cape Peninsula University of Technology This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty of Health & Wellness Sciences at Digital Knowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tygerberg Dental Sciences by an authorized administrator of Digital Knowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Burger, Elwin, "The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis to Restore the Natural Dentition of a Patient" (2007). Tygerberg Dental Sciences. Paper 42. http://dk.cput.ac.za/tygerberg_ds/42

Upload: others

Post on 22-Oct-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Cape Peninsula University of TechnologyDigital Knowledge

Tygerberg Dental Sciences Faculty of Health & Wellness Sciences

1-1-2007

The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a MandibularProsthesis to Restore the Natural Dentition of aPatientElwin BurgerCape Peninsula University of Technology

This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty of Health & Wellness Sciences at Digital Knowledge. It has been accepted forinclusion in Tygerberg Dental Sciences by an authorized administrator of Digital Knowledge. For more information, please [email protected].

Recommended CitationBurger, Elwin, "The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis to Restore the Natural Dentition of a Patient" (2007).Tygerberg Dental Sciences. Paper 42.http://dk.cput.ac.za/tygerberg_ds/42

Page 2: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 1 of 15

The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis to Restore

the Natural Dentition of a Patient

Name: Elwin Burger, National Diploma in Dental Technology, Department of Dental

Sciences, CPUT, Bellville 2008

Return Address:

13 Order road, Hoheizen, Bellvile 7530

Contact Number:

Mobile: 072 040 2331

Home: 021 913 3963

Key words: periodontitis, maxillary, mandibular, polymerization

Summary

Periodontitis is a result of long term accumulation of plaque and tartar between the tissue

and the root of the tooth.1 The disease involves progressive loss of the alveolar bone

supporting the teeth and in this specific case may eventually lead to the loosening and

subsequent loss of teeth if it’s left untreated. This article is about the manufacturing of a

maxillary and a mandibular prosthesis in order to restore the natural dentition of a fifty-

five year old male with a middle class income, and a history of severe periodontitis.

Page 3: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 2 of 15

Various options of treatments are available for the patient, and is each individually

discussed. A conclusion is also made on which one best suit the need of the patient, as

well as which one is most appropriate for his financial situation.

Introduction

A comparative study by Muhlemann and Green showed that males between the ages of

eleven and thirteen are more prone to marginal infections and males between the age of

thirty and fifty making this patient an ideal example.2,3

It was decided by the patient and

the dentist that the most affordable, suitable and effective option would be to fabricate a

anterior porcelain fused to metal crown to enhance aesthetics, as well as two posterior

gold crowns with precision milled shoulder attachments to improve the overall retention

of the removable cobalt chrome partial denture that replaces the rest of the missing

maxillary teeth.6 For the mandibular arch, a full acrylic denture with selective labial gum

tinting was fabricated to provide the denture with a more natural and life like appearance.

The patient has been diagnosed with severe periodontitis which lead to the permanent

loss of some maxillary and mandibular teeth. The need for oral rehabilitation became a

major reason of concern to the patient mainly for the reason of bad aesthetics, speech

difficulty and masticatory problems.3 The case has been classified as a Kennedy

classification 3 modification 2.4 For this specific case various treatment options were

available but due to the patient’s financial constraints, some were totally eliminated and

Page 4: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 3 of 15

the best and most suitable one was chosen to restore the natural harmony and masticatory

functions.

Before any of the laboratory work could be done, the patient had to receive proper

cleaning and scaling of the remaining maxillary teeth, being the 2.7 - 2.8, 21-22, 2.5 and

2.6-2.7 over a period of one month, to improve his overall oral hygiene. All of the

remaining maxillary teeth were then extracted during surgery due to the severity of bone

loss as well as all of the remaining mandibular teeth. The patient’s 1.8, 2.1 and 2.7 was

then also prepared for the cementation process of the various crowns. The various

treatment options that were available for this specific case were a fourteen-unit upper and

lower implant-retained bridge, full maxillary and mandibular acrylic dentures, partial

acrylic and cobalt chrome removable partial dentures and lastly implant-retained over-

dentures.

Option one: Fourteen-unit implant-retained bridge (R 35000)

The biggest advantage or positive point about a fourteen-unit implant-retained bridge is

the phenomenal aesthetics and life-like appearance that it possesses. It has an extremely

satisfying life expectancy of usually ten to fifteen years and, in some situations even

longer, depending on the quality of the crown. 8

The biggest disadvantage of this type of oral rehabilitation is the cost and time involved

for both the surgical placement of the implants as well as laboratory time needed to

fabricate the metal substructures retaining the porcelain crowns.9,11

Poorly designed

Page 5: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 4 of 15

crowns have the tendency after a period of time to have a grey shine in the gingival area

due to the metal that shines through the translucent part of the gingival tissue. In most

situations, this then leads to the need for alteration, or total replacement of, the crown.

Another common problem is that the patient in some instances can experience pain,

tenderness and discomfort of the tissues during and after the placement of the implants. 10

Fig 1. Implant-retained bridge1

Option two: Conventional acrylic dentures (R1313)

Conventional acrylic dentures are commonly worn by patients all around the globe, the

most probable reason being that it is fabricated with strong durable material that can last

for up to ten years, if not longer, depending on the rate at which the alveolar bone resorps.

(This is caused by the pressure applied to the bone during mastication) Any denture

greatly improves the aesthetics of the patient, as well as the overall facial profile of the

patient regarding the lip and cheek support.

Page 6: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 5 of 15

The disadvantages of conventional acrylic dentures are that some patients find the

pronunciation of words to be difficult, the cause probably being the bulkiness of the

dentures if they are poorly designed. Dentures take time to get used to, and after a period

of time, the dentures also start to lose their fit, due to the amount of ridge resorption. This

can be an embarrassment to the patient as the dentures may dislodge at any time. For

retention purposes, the total surface area of the palate is covered with acrylic but has the

disadvantage that the patient loses the normal sensation he would have had without

wearing the dentures, and the hardness of the resin material can cause mouth sores and

irritation.10

Fig 2. Full acrylic dentures7

Option three: Acrylic removable partial dentures (R587)

Acrylic removable partial dentures is in general much smaller in design, as only sectional

parts of acrylic are used, mostly in the palatal area, increasing the level of comfort. The

great flexibility of the stainless steel clasps, provide the removable partial denture with

great retention, depending on the amount of undercut available on the labial and palatal

Page 7: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 6 of 15

aspect of the tooth. Another advantage is that the remaining healthy standing teeth is

preserved, which helps to slow down the rate at which the alveolar ridge resorps.

The only disadvantage of acrylic removable partial dentures is that it requires proper

surveying, designing and planning regarding the positioning and placement of the clasps,

cause if not the clasps, abrading against the tooth surface can contribute to tooth

sensitivity. Over a period of time the flexibility of the clasp is lost, causing the partial

denture to tip and dislodge when unequal forces of mastication is applied. Removable

partial dentures need to be cleaned on a daily basis, to maintain a good level of oral

hygiene, because the retentive clasp has the tendency to be food traps. 7,9,10

Fig 3. Acrylic partial denture7

Option four: Cobalt-chrome removable partial dentures (R1977)

Cobalt-chrome removable partial dentures have the great advantage of being extremely

biocompatible and hypoallergenic. The cobalt-chrome metal provides the denture with

extra strength and durabillity, and also contributes greatly to the overall weight of the

denture. The skeleton design allows for maximum palatal exposure so the patient still has

Page 8: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 7 of 15

the natural feel and sensation as he normally would have had. The metal design is in

general, much thinner than that of acrylic removable partial dentures so it has a much

higher level of fit and comfort, and also a longer life expectancy. Cobalt-chrome

removable partial dentures can easily be removed for cleaning, and has brilliant stability

in the oral environment.

The disadvantages, on the other hand, are that removable cobalt-chrome partial dentures

are about three times as expensive as acrylic removable partial dentures. Extreme care

needs to be taken in the design process to ensure a one hundred percent accurate fit of the

clasps and surface fit. The clasps that serve for retention purposes can in some situations

be highly unsightly if they are used in the anterior region, so influencing the general

appearance of the patient.10,14

Elwin burger

Fig 4. Cobalt-chrome partial denture

Page 9: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 8 of 15

Option five: Implant –retained over dentures (R 12 000)

The last option and probably the most suitable option especially for the mandible is an

implant-retained over-denture. Implant-retained overdentures are mostly used for

mandibular cases, as the rate of alveolar bone resorption is much faster than the maxilla.

This type of conventional denture is secured to the jaw bone using various implants. It

has a high life expectancy and brilliant aesthetics. The patient’s natural teeth are

preserved, and the process of alveolar bone resorption is delayed, so preserving the fit of

the appliance for a much greater period of time.

On the other side it has the disadvantage of being more expensive compared to any of the

other types of dentures and partial dentures discussed. The implant takes time to heal, and

is only ideal for patients with a good level of oral-hygiene, which makes one wonder if

this is the most suitable option for this patient. Implants can cause tenderness and

swelling of the tissue, and can cause irritation and discomfort to the patient.13,15

Fig 5. Implant-retained overdenture7

Page 10: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 9 of 15

Treatment of choice

The treatment of choice most suitable for the patient’s condition as decided by the patient

and the dentist is an anterior porcelain fused to metal crown, for aesthetic reasons in a B3

shade color; two precision milled posterior gold crowns for a perfect seating and

improved retention to the cobalt-chrome removable partial denture that replaces the

missing maxillary teeth. For the mandible, a standard conventional acrylic denture with

selective labial gum tinting will be fabricated, in order to mimic the natural appearance of

the tissue and to give the denture a lifelike appearance. If future financial provision can

be arranged, and the oral hygiene is of a satisfactory condition, the option of a fourteen

unit implant-retained bridge can be considered.

Elwin burger Elwin Burger

Fig 6. Porcelain and gold crowns Fig 7. Cobalt-chrome partial denture

Page 11: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 10 of 15

Laboratory procedures

The first step in regards to the laboratory work involves the simple preparation of the

models. The VMK coping is then waxed-up including a marginal collar to resemble a

smaller version of the original size of the tooth. The wax coping is then sprued and

invested, before it is cast and trimmed. The porcelain crown is then manufactured

following all the basic steps, including the REX- V degas process and, the painting of the

opaque layer. Once the porcelain is build up to the correct size, shape and morphology, it

is baked in order to bring the porcelain to life.

The metal collar is then shone to finish of the beauty of the overall appearance of the

crown. The posterior crowns are then waxed up according to simulate the natural

morphology of a maxillary permanent molar. The precision attachment is then milled to

an equal distance taking special care not to mill through the wax unto the model. Upon

completion the wax crown is sprued and invested using Beauty-cast investment material.

The investment is left to dry for a time period of forty-fife minutes, before it is placed in

the furnace to eliminate the wax crown. When the casting furnace has reached the

required temperature and enough time has been allowed for the mould to heat soak, it is

cast using the open flame technique. The cast crown is then trimmed and shone, placed

back onto the model so that it can be duplicated. The model with the crowns in place is

then left to soak in luke-warm water to eliminate the excess air that is trapped in the

model. If the model has soaked for about fifteen minutes it is duplicated using a

duplicating flask. The material is then left to cool and harden for forty-five minutes

before the model is carefully removed from the mould.

Page 12: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 11 of 15

Before the model is duplicated it is surveyed using a surveyor, to determine the unwanted

undercuts on the model. The undercuts is then blocked out to ensure that there is a perfect

fit of the cobalt chrome removable partial denture clasps. Once the model is poured in

refractory material, it is then oven dried for a period of forty-five minutes before it is

dipped into a hardener for ten seconds, and again oven dried for five. The model is then

cooled down before the cobalt chrome removable partial denture is waxed up according

to the design decided upon by the dentist and the technologist, to ensure the most natural

feel in the mouth. Once the design is completed using the various types of appropriate

waxes, it sprued, either from above or below. Spruing from below(inverted) has a higher

success rate than spruing form above.

The model with the design is then secured to the rubber base of the muffel before the

refractory investment material is poured and allowed to dry for forty-five minutes. The

wax design is then eliminated from the mould using the wax elimination technique. Upon

proper elimination the mould is placed in the furnace. The furnace is then set to reach a

temperature of one thousand and fifty degree Celsius. Once the desired temperature is

reached the design is cast using either open flame or the induction casting technique.

Once the mould has cooled down properly, the chrome is devested, sandblasted and

trimmed to ensure a hundred percent fit of the cobalt chrome removable partial denture

on the model.

Once the appliance has been high shined, the maxillary artificial teeth is set accordingly

to fulfill the aesthetics and naturally waxed up following the root structure of the patient.

Page 13: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 12 of 15

A matrix is then fabricated around the various areas of the teeth, so that the wax can be

eliminated and the filled with a diluted, easy flowing mixture of acrylic resin. It is then

placed into curing unit to ensure proper polymerization of the resin. The matrices are then

removed and the acrylic is neatly trimmed and high shined.

Last step in the fabrication process is the manufacturing of the mandibular denture. The

mandibular teeth are set to be in proper occlusion harmony with the maxillary teeth and

waxed up accordingly. The denture is then invested using various mixtures of plaster.

Once the plaster has set completely the wax is eliminated and the gingival areas is tinted

using different colors of pink, purple and brown heat cure polymer and monomer. The

tinting is done using the salt and pepper technique. Once done the flasks containing the

mould is packed with acrylic resin and placed in the curing unit to polymerize. Lastly the

denture is devested , trimmed and shined

Problems experienced

The overall success of the prosthesis all depend on the care taken in the planning and the

fabrication process. Various problems experienced like, the difficulty in precision

milling of the posterior gold crowns, patient not arriving for dentist appointments,

incomplete casting of the cobalt chrome removable partial denture, and poor fitting of the

chrome clasps around the gold crowns delayed the over all delivery time of the prostheses

to the patient. The problem of milling was overcome by increasing the thickness of the

posterior wax crowns, and the incomplete casting simply by re-doing it. The poor fitting

clasps were adjusted using orthodontic pliers until it fitted properly

Page 14: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 13 of 15

Conclusion

Periodontitis is a commonly found oral disease in most instances found in elderly people.

The main reason for it a result of long term accumulation of plaque and tartar between the

teeth and gums, and extend downwards between the root of the tooth, and the underlying

bone. If a disease like in this case continues, eventually so much of jaw-bone near the

pocket is lost that the tooth becomes mobile and is permanently lost. The final decision

for the prosthesis greatly depended on the level of the patient’s oral hygiene as well as his

financial constraints. Various options were available, one being a fourteen-unit maxillary

and mandibular implant-retained bridge, full acrylic dentures, removable acrylic or

cobalt-chrome removable partial denture, and implant-retained overdentures. Each

individual appliance has its own advantages and disadvantages, and based upon that a

final decision was made by the dentist and the patient that the most affordable, suitable

and effective option would be to fabricate a anterior porcelain fused to metal crown to

enhance aesthetics, as well as two posterior gold crowns with precision milled shoulder

attachments to improve the overall retention of the removable cobalt chrome partial

denture, replacing the rest of the missing maxillary teeth. For the mandibular arch, a full

acrylic denture with selective labial gum tinting was fabricated to provide the denture

with a more natural and life like appearance.

Page 15: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 14 of 15

References

1. Lindhe J. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, 4th ed. London: Oxford

University Press. 2003: 47-53

2. MayoClinic.com-Tools for Healthier Lives. Available:

http://www.mayoclionic.com/health/periodontitis 26 July 2008

3. Oral Health-Common Problems- All About Periodontitis. Available:

http://www.health24.com/medical/condition_centres. 26 July 2008.

4. Smith GNB. Planning and Making Crowns and Bridges. 3rd ed. London: Martin

Dunitz Ltd. 1998: 24-25.

5. Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science

Ltd. 2002: 180, 238, 240.

6. Wulfes H. Precision Milling and Partial Denture Constructions-A Manual. 1st ed.

Bremen: Academia Dental International School BEGO Germany. 2004: 57-59; 138; 195.

7. Muraoka H. A Colour Atlas of Complete Denture Fabrication. Chicago: Quitessence

Publishing Company. 1989: 41-43.

8. Babbush CA. Dental Implants: The Art and Science. Philadelphia: W B Saunders

Company. 2001: 3-19.

9. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Rhoads JE. Dental Laboratory Procedures-Complete Dentures.

Volume 1. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company. 1986: 223-240, 312-320.

10. Basker RM, Davenport JC. Prosthetic Treatment of the Edentulous Patient. 4th ed.

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Company. 2002: 146-241.

11. Roberts DH. Fixed Bridge Prostheses. 2nd ed. England: John Wright and Sons Ltd.

1980: 129-130, 139-140, 166.

Page 16: The Fabrication of a Maxillary and a Mandibular Prosthesis

Page 15 of 15

12. Mclean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics. Volume 1- The Nature of

Dental Ceramics and their Clinical use. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. 1979: 23-

28, 37-39.

13. Dykema RW. Johnston’s Modern Practice in Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed.

Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Company. 1986: 8-16, 22-25, 60-63.

14. Jenkins G. Precision Attachments: A Link to Successful Restorative Treatment.

London: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd. 1999: 33-40.

15. Stewart KL. Clinical Removable Partial Prosthodontics. St. Louis: The C V Mosby

Company. 1983: 18-20; 56-60