the dea regulations_final

53
Na#onal Rx Drug Abuse Summit Pharmaceu)cal TakeBack and the Proposed DEA Regula)ons Pharmacy Track – April 3, 2013 Sco= Cassel, CEO and Founder The Product Stewardship Ins#tute 1

Upload: opunite

Post on 01-Nov-2014

620 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Pharmacy Track, National Rx Drug Abuse Summit, April 2-4, 2013. The DEA Regulations presentation by Scott Cassel, Chris Angel and Phil Burgess.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The dea regulations_final

Na#onal  Rx  Drug  Abuse  Summit  

Pharmaceu)cal  Take-­‐Back  and  the  Proposed  DEA  Regula)ons  

Pharmacy  Track  –  April  3,  2013  

Sco=  Cassel,  CEO  and  Founder  The  Product  Stewardship  Ins#tute  

1  

Page 2: The dea regulations_final

Disclosure  Statement  

Sco=  Cassel  has  no  has  no  financial  rela#onships  with  proprietary  en##es  that  produce  health  care  goods  and  services.    

Chris  Angel  has  no  financial  rela#onships  with  proprietary  en##es  that  produce  health  care  goods  and  services.    

Phil  Burgess  has  no  financial  rela#onships  with  proprietary  en##es  that  produce  health  care  goods  and  services.    

2  

Page 3: The dea regulations_final

1.  Iden#fy  the  basis  and  effects  of  the  proposed  DEA  regula#ons.  

2.    Lay  out  the  impact  of  the  proposed  regula#ons.  

3.    Construct  a  plan  of  ac#on  to  implement  the  DEA    regula#ons  and  pill  take-­‐back  programs  in  the  a=endee’s    community.  

Session  Learning  Objec#ves  

3  

Page 4: The dea regulations_final

Topics  I  will  cover  today  •  The  Problem  –  Improper  Disposal  of  Pharmaceu)cals  

•  Safety  issues  •  Environmental  concerns  

•   The  Solu)on:  Pharmaceu)cal  Take-­‐Back  programs  •  Support  for  Take-­‐Back  •  Trends    -­‐  U.S.  and  interna#onal  •  Why  exis#ng  efforts  are  not  solving  the  problem  

•  Overview  of  Product  Stewardship  and  Extended  Producer  Responsibility  (EPR)  for  Managing  Waste  Pharmaceu)cals  

•  Legisla#ve  ac#vity  at  local,  state,  and  federal  levels  

•  Overview  of  DEA’s  Proposed  Regula)ons  Regarding  the  Disposal  of  Controlled  Substances  

4  

Page 5: The dea regulations_final

Who  is  the    Product  Stewardship  Ins#tute?  

•   Non-­‐profit  founded  in  2000  •  Memberships  

  47  States    200+  Local  governments  

•  Partnerships  (95+)    Companies    Organiza#ons      Universi#es    Non-­‐US  Governments  

•  Board  of  Directors:  7  states,      4  local  agencies  

•  Advisory  Council:  Mul)-­‐stakeholder  (14  members)  

Global  Product  Stewardship  Council  (PSI  represented  on  Board  of  Directors)  

5  

Page 6: The dea regulations_final

The  Problem:  Drug-­‐induced  deaths  second  only  to  motor  vehicle  fatali#es  (1999–2007)  

Source:  Na#onal  Center  for  Health  Sta#s#cs,  Centers  for  Disease  Control  and  Preven#on.  Na#onal  Vital  Sta#s#cs  Reports  Deaths:    Final  Data  for  the  years  1999  to  2007  (2001  to  2010).  

6  

Page 7: The dea regulations_final

The  Problem:  Prescrip#on  Drug  Abuse  

Classified  as  an  “epidemic”  by  the  Centers  for  Disease  

Control  and  Preven#on  

7  out  of  10  prescrip#on  drug  abusers  obtained  their  drugs  from  friends  

or  rela#ves  

7  

Page 8: The dea regulations_final

The  Problem:  Accidental  Poisonings  

8  

•  Startling  facts  from  the  Centers  for  Disease  Control  and  Preven)on:  •  In  2009,  76%  of  poisoning  deaths  in  the  U.S.  were  uninten#onal  •  In  2009,  91%  of  all  uninten#onal  poisoning  deaths  were  caused  by  

drugs.  •  Among  children,  emergency  room  visits  for  drug  poisonings  (excluding  

misuse  or  abuse)  are  twice  as  common  as  poisonings  from  other  household  products  (e.g.,  cleaning  solu#ons)  1  

•  Between  2004  and  2005,  an  es#mated  71,000  children  (<18  years  of  age)  were  seen  in  emergency  rooms  due  to  drug  poisonings  (excluding  abuse  and  recrea#onal  drug  use).    

•  Over  80%  were  because  an  unsupervised  child  found  and  consumed  medica#ons.  1  

1Schillie  SF,  Shehab,  N,  Thomas,  KE,  Budnitz  DS.  Medica#on  overdoses  leading  to  emergency  department  visits  among  children.  Am  J  Prev  Med  2009;37:181-­‐187.  

Page 9: The dea regulations_final

The  Problem:  Environmental  Concerns    

•  Medicines  enter  our  waterways  via  a  number  of  channels:  •  Agricultural  run-­‐off  •  Human  excre#on  •  Improper  disposal  

•  Effects  in  the  environment:  •  Aqua#c  impacts  •  Poten#al  contamina#on  of  drinking  water  

•  Current  wastewater  treatment  plants  not  designed  to  remove  pharmaceu#cal  compounds    

9  

Page 10: The dea regulations_final

Pharmaceu#cal  Take-­‐Back  Programs  

•  One-­‐day  “Take-­‐Back”  events  operated  by:  •  Law  enforcement  (can  accept  controlled  substances)  •  Local  governments/Household  Hazardous  Waste  collec#ons  •  Community  organiza#ons  and  other  NGOs  

•  Permanent  collec)ons  located  at:  •  Police  departments  (can  accept  controlled  substances)  •  Retail  pharmacies  •  Healthcare  facili#es,  community  centers,  etc.  

•  Mail-­‐back  programs    •  Law  enforcement  •  Retail  pharmacies  (partnering  with  reverse  distributors)  –  for  a  fee  •  University  pilots  (e.g.,  University  of  Maine,  University  of  Wisconsin  

Extension)  

10  

Page 11: The dea regulations_final

Support  for  Drug  Take-­‐Back  

•  Drug  Enforcement  Administra)on  (DEA)  •  Held  5  Na#onal  Prescrip#on  Drug  Take-­‐Back  Days  since  2010    next  event  scheduled  for  April  27,  2013  

•  Office  of  Na)onal  Drug  Control  Policy  (ONDCP)  •  Supports  drug  take-­‐back  as  part  of  its  Na#onal  Drug  Control  Strategy  

•  Food  and  Drug  Administra)on  (FDA)  •  Worked  with  ONDCP  to  develop  guidelines  for  drug  disposal      recommends  disposal  via  drug  take-­‐back  programs  

•  Environmental  Protec)on  Agency  (EPA)  •  Encourages  the  public  to  take  advantage  of  drug  take-­‐back  programs  

•  43  states  directly  promote  drug  take-­‐back    •  Agency  websites  provide  informa#on  either  on  their  own  state  programs  and/

or  federal  DEA  Take-­‐Back  Days    

11  

Page 12: The dea regulations_final

Status  of  Pharmaceu#cal  Take-­‐Back  Programs  

N=  562  (some  respondents  selected  mul:ple  methods)  

N=  926  (some  respondents  selected  mul:ple  sources)  

•  Over  500  take-­‐back  programs  currently  opera#ng  across  the  country,  but  the  majority  of  Americans  do  not  have  access  to  a  convenient  take-­‐back  loca#on  

Results  from  Community  Medical  Founda:on  for  Pa:ent  Safety’s    Survey  of  Drug  Take-­‐Back  and  Disposal  Programs  (2009  ,  2010)  

12  

43%  

26%  

22%  

9%  

Primary  Funding  Mechanism  of  Drug  Take-­‐Back  Programs    

Self-­‐funded,  43%  

Sponsors,  26%  

Grants,  22%  

Other,  9%  

53%  

19%  

17%  

8%  

3%  

Collec)on  Method  of  Drug  Take-­‐Back  Programs  

Drop-­‐off  (Pharmacy),  53%  Drop-­‐off  (Police  Sta#on),  19%  One-­‐Day  Events,  17%  

Other,  8%  

Direct  Mail  Back,  3%  

Page 13: The dea regulations_final

Why  aren’t  exis#ng  efforts    solving  the  problem?  

PSI  developed  Key  Elements  of  Pharmaceu)cal  Collec)on  and  Disposal  Programs:  A  Vision  for  the  Great  Lakes  Region  

•  In  order  to  protect  public  health  and  the  environment,  programs  should  be:  

•  Programs  should  minimize  impact  on  the  environment  by  ensuring  collected  medicines  are  properly  destroyed  according  to  exis#ng  regula#ons.  

•  Programs  must  be  sustainably  and  adequately  funded.  •  Programs  should  iden#fy  and  address  the  underlying  drivers  that  contribute  to  

pharmaceu#cal  waste.  

•  On-­‐going  •  Convenient  •  Able  to  accept  all  drugs  from  

households  

•  Free  at  the  point  of  delivery  for  disposal  •  Secure  •  Widely  promoted  

13  

Page 14: The dea regulations_final

A  policy  approach  that…  

• Minimizes  health,  safety,  environmental,  and  social  impacts  

• Maximizes  economic  benefits  of  a  product  and  its  packaging  

• Considers  all  lifecycle  stages,  from  design  to  end-­‐of-­‐life  

• Is  either  voluntary  or  required  by  law    

What  is  Product  Stewardship?  

14  

Page 15: The dea regulations_final

Product  Stewardship  

Extended  Producer  

Responsibility  (EPR)  

• Mandatory  product  stewardship  

• Producers  hold  financial  and  managerial  responsibility  for  post-­‐consumer  products  and  packaging  

• Central  tenet  of  product  stewardship  

What  is  Extended  Producer  Responsibility  (EPR)?  

15  

Page 16: The dea regulations_final

Extended  Producer  

Responsibility  (EPR)  

What  might  EPR  for  Pharmaceu#cals    Really  Look  Like?  

16  

Page 17: The dea regulations_final

Federal  Pharmaceu#cal  Stewardship  Legisla#on  

Pharmaceu)cal  Stewardship  Act  of  2011    •  Introduced  by  Congresswoman  Louise  Slaughter  (NY)  

•  First  federal  EPR  bill  on  any  product  

•  Would  create  “Na#onal  Pharmaceu#cal  Stewardship  Organiza#on,”  with  Directors  appointed  by  EPA,  to  implement  a  na#onal  EPR  program  

•  Rep.  Slaughter  plans  to  re-­‐introduce  in  2013  

17  

Page 18: The dea regulations_final

Pharmaceu#cal  Stewardship  Legisla#on  State  Level  

Bills  introduced:       California  (2013)           Florida  (2009)       Maine  (2010)       Maryland  (2010)       Minnesota  (2010)       New  York  (2011;  2013)       Oregon  (2009)       Pennsylvania  (2012)       Washington  (2011)  

18  

Page 19: The dea regulations_final

Local  Approach  to  Pharmaceu#cal  Stewardship  

•  Na#on’s  first  local  EPR  law,  first  pharmaceu#cals  EPR  law  

•  Requires  pharmaceu#cal  manufacturers  to  finance  and  manage  a  take-­‐back  program  for  unused  and  expired  medica#ons  

•  Industry  lawsuit  claiming  law  violates  the  Interstate  Commerce  Clause    pending  

19  

Page 20: The dea regulations_final

Secure  and  Responsible  Drug  Disposal  Act  

•  Passed  by  Congress  in  October  2010  to  provide  a  framework  for  allowing  the  public  (i.e.,  ul#mate  users)  to  dispose  of  their  lesover  and  expired  controlled  substances  safely  and  securely  (more  flexibility  &  less  costly)  •  Amends  the  Controlled  Substances  Act    

•  Drug  Enforcement  Administra#on  (DEA)  to  develop  regula#ons  regarding  the  disposal  of  controlled  substances  •  January  2011  –  public  hearing  held  in  Washington,  D.C.  •  December  2012  –  DEA  issued  proposed  rule  [Docket  No.  

DEA  -­‐316];  comment  period  closed  February  19,  2013  

20  

Page 21: The dea regulations_final

DEA  Proposed  Rule    Disposal  of  Controlled  Substances  

DEA  proposed  to  expand  collec#on  op#ons  for  the  disposal  of    controlled  substances  to  include:  

1.   Take-­‐back  events  –  conducted  by  law  enforcement  agencies  only.  

2.   Permanent  collec)on  sites  –  operated  by  DEA-­‐authorized  retail  pharmacies,  distributors,  reverse  distributors,  law  enforcement  agencies,  or  manufacturers.  Retail  pharmacies  may  also  operate  collec#on  receptacles  at  long–term  care  facili#es  (“LTCFs”).  

3.   Mail-­‐back  programs  –  operated  by  DEA-­‐authorized  manufacturers,  distributors,  reverse  distributors,  retail  pharmacies,  or  law  enforcement  agencies.  

21  

Page 22: The dea regulations_final

Scob  Cassel  PSI  Chief  Execu#ve  Officer  &  Founder  

 617-­‐236-­‐4822  

[email protected]  www.productstewardship.us  

Contact  

22  

Page 23: The dea regulations_final

Pharmaceu)cal  Take-­‐Back  and  the  Proposed  DEA  Regula)ons  

April  2  –  4,  2013  Omni  Orlando  Resort    

at  ChampionsGate  

Page 24: The dea regulations_final

Topics  I  will  cover  today  

1.  Understand  the  importance  of  drug  take-­‐back  programs  and  the  poten#al  role  for  pharmaceu#cal  stewardship  in  addressing  drug  abuse.  

2.    Iden#fy  the  basics  of  DEA’s  proposed  rule  and  the  implica#ons  for  retail  pharmacies.    

3.    Construct  a  plan  of  ac#on  to  par#cipate  in  a  drug  take-­‐back  program  in  the  a=endees’  community  following  requirements  proposed  by  the  DEA  

Page 25: The dea regulations_final

The  Problem  

•  Flushing  unwanted/unused  medica#ons  •  Associated  Press  Study  •  US  Geological  Study  •  DEQ  –  Michigan  Department  of  Environmental  Quality-­‐Other  State  Regulatory  Agencies  

•  Prescrip#on  Drug  Abuse  •  DEA  –Controlled  Substances  

Page 26: The dea regulations_final

1.  

Page 27: The dea regulations_final
Page 28: The dea regulations_final
Page 29: The dea regulations_final
Page 30: The dea regulations_final
Page 31: The dea regulations_final
Page 32: The dea regulations_final

Clean  Water    Safe  Communi#es  

Environmental  Reasons………  

Substance  Abuse  Preven#on  Reasons……  

Law  Enforcement  Reasons…..  

Page 33: The dea regulations_final

Clean  Water  Safe  Communi#es  

We  Agree  on  that!  Let’s  Work  Together!  

What  will  you  do  when  you  get  home  from  the  Rx  Drug  Abuse  Summit?  

Yellow  Jug  Old  Drugs  Program  working  in  many  communi#es  to  provide  clean  water  and  safe  communi#es  

Page 34: The dea regulations_final

Yellow  Jug  Old  Drugs  Program  Overview  

Non  Profit  Model  

Pharmacy  based  

Area  Served  

Number  of  par#cipa#ng  Pharmacies  

55,000  pounds  collected  

Page 35: The dea regulations_final

Yellow  Jug  Old  Drugs    Advantages  

•  Pharmacy  based  and  easily  recognizable  •  Well  thought  out,  strict  protocol  •  Leverage  grant  funds-­‐Sustainable  aser  grants  •  Low  opera#onal  cost  /  Volunteers      •       Professional  Customer  Service  •  Free  publicity  –  News  stories,  Radio  and  Video  public  service  

announcements  (PSAs)  •  More  a=en#on  on  collec#on  of  controlled  substances  in  

communi#es  that  have  YJOD  •  New  DEA  Regs  to  allow  retail  pharmacies  to  accept  controlled  

substances  

Page 36: The dea regulations_final

Proposed  DEA    Regs  allow  Retail  Pharmacies  to  collect  controlled  Substances  

•   Page  8  of  the  proposed  regula#ons    “authorized  registrants  that  choose  to  maintain  collec:on  receptacles  may  be  enhanced  by  increased  consumer  presence  at  their  registered  loca:ons  and  the  goodwill  that  develops  from  providing  a  valuable  community  service””  Page  86  “A  pharmacy  may  derive  tangible  benefits  such  as  addi:onal  revenue  from  increased  retail  traffic  to  the  pharmacy”  

Page 37: The dea regulations_final

Substance  Abuse  Preven#on  Partners  Michigan    

Rx  Be  the  Solu#on  Campaign  NMSAS  www.drugfreenorthernmichigan.com/disposal.htmlaign  

h=p://www.barrycountysa}.com  

Royal  Oak  Community  Coali#on  

The  Alliance  of  Coali#ons  for  Healthy  Communi#es  (ACHC)  

Page 38: The dea regulations_final

Links-­‐Website,  Map,  PSA’s  

•  h=p://www.greatlakescleanwater.org  

•  Par#cipa#ng  Pharmacy  Map    

•  h=p://www.youtube.com/user/GreatLakesCleanWater  

Page 39: The dea regulations_final

Contact  Info  

Chris  Angel  President,  Volunteer  Board  of  Directors  Great  Lakes  Clean  Water  Organiza#on  [email protected]  www.greatlakescleanwater.org  989-­‐736-­‐8179  

Page 40: The dea regulations_final

Pharmaceu)cal  Take-­‐Back  and  the  Proposed  DEA  Regula)ons  

Philip  P.  Burgess,  RPh,  DPh,  MBA  Chairman,  Illinois  State  Board  of  Pharmacy  

April  2  –  4,  2013  Omni  Orlando  Resort    at  ChampionsGate  

Page 41: The dea regulations_final

Topics  I  will  cover  today  

•  1.              Understand  the  importance  of  drug  take-­‐back  programs  and  the  poten#al  role  for  pharmaceu#cal  stewardship  in  addressing  drug  abuse.  

•  2.              Iden#fy  the  basics  of  DEA’s  proposed  rule  and  the  implica#ons  for  retail  pharmacies.  

•  3.              Construct  a  plan  of  ac#on  to  par#cipate  in  a  drug  take-­‐back  program  in  the  a=endees’  community  following  requirements  proposed  by  the  DEA.  

Page 42: The dea regulations_final

Role  of  State  Boards  of  Pharmacy    

•  Protect  the  health  and  welfare  of  the  ci#zens  of  their  respec#ve  state.  

•  Ac#ve  involvement  in  drug  disposal  programs  by  pharmacists  can  have  significant  posi#ve  impact  on  pa#ent  safety  and  improve  pa#ent  care  

•  Delicate  “balancing  act”  to  decrease  drug  diversion  while  improving  pa#ent  safety.  

Page 43: The dea regulations_final

Unused patient medication in the U.S.

•  Approximately 4 billion prescriptions are filled in the United States annually with an estimated 35%, or 200 million pounds go unused.

•  Improper disposal of unused medications can adversely effect the environment

•  Improper disposal or diversion of unused medications increases the risk of accidental poisoning and drug abuse.

Page 44: The dea regulations_final

Societal Impacts When Drugs Get Into the Wrong Hands

Easy access to prescription drugs has led to a growing number of teens whom the Partnership for a Drug-Free America refers to as “Generation Rx.”

Nationwide, 1.5 Million kids say they have abused prescription drugs. The 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health indicates that over 70 percent of Americans 12 and older who used pain relievers non-medically in the previous year obtained the drugs from a friend or relative.

Emergency room visits are greater for prescription drugs than marijuana and heroin COMBINED, according to the Drug Abuse Warning Network.

Page 45: The dea regulations_final

Why Pharmacists Should be Involved

Pharmacists  are  posi#oned  to  play  a  huge  role  in  helping  properly  dispose  of  unused  medica#ons.  

The  most  readily  available  health  care  professional  in  the  community.  

It  makes  sense  to  return  the  drugs  from  where  they  were  ini#ally  purchased.  

Page 46: The dea regulations_final

Disposal Options

The Prescription Pill & Drug Disposal Program is a multi-state, collaborative effort between communities, local pharmacies, police departments, hospitals and city officials. Locations such as pharmacies and police stations can participate by setting up drop-boxes for the public to drop off their old or unused prescription drugs.

www.p2d2program.org

Page 47: The dea regulations_final

Disposal Options

Minnesota’s “Take it to The Box” program at participating police stations.

Similar grassroots efforts are popping up nation-wide.

Page 48: The dea regulations_final

NCPA Dispose My Meds •  In 2010, National Community Pharmacy Association developed a

program to promote pharmacists involvement with drug disposal.

•  Pilot program in conjunction with the Iowa Pharmacy Association and the Iowa Board of Pharmacy.

•  Participating NCPA members listed on www.disposemymeds.org •  To date:

–  1,400 pharmacies participating –  70,000 lbs of drugs collected for safe disposal –  The Secure and Responsible Drug Disposal Act (S. 3397),

legislation backed by NCPA will improve and encourage voluntary prescription drug disposal programs like the Dispose My Meds program.

Page 49: The dea regulations_final
Page 50: The dea regulations_final

Impact  of  Proposed  DEA  Regula#ons    

“These  regula#ons  propose  to  allow  authorized  manufacturers,  distributors,  reverse  distributors  and  retail  pharmacies  to  voluntarily  administer  mail-­‐back  programs  and  maintain  collec#on  receptacles.  In  addi#on,  this  proposed  rule  expands  the  authority  of  authorized  retail  pharmacies  to  voluntarily  maintain  collec#on  receptacles  at  long  term  care  facili#es.”  

Page 51: The dea regulations_final

Impact  of  Proposed  DEA  Regula#ons    

•  Allows  pharmacies  to  par#cipate  in  taking  back  controlled  substance  prescrip#ons  from  pa#ents  without  the  requirement  of  direct  law  enforcement  involvement.  

•  Increased  access  to  pa#ents  for  the  proper  disposal  through  drop-­‐off  kiosks  in  pharmacies  or  use  of  various  mail-­‐back  programs.  

•  Extensive  record-­‐keeping  requirements.  

Page 52: The dea regulations_final

Impact  of  Proposed  DEA  Regula#ons    

•  Although  most  state  pharmacy  regula#ons  mirror  DEA,  there  will  be  selected  states  that  will  require  changes  to  either  their  Pharmacy  Prac#ce  Acts  or  their  Rules  to  allow  the  taking  back  of  medica#ons  in  the  pharmacies.  

•  Un#l  those  changes  are  enacted,  the  use  of  the  mail-­‐back  provisions  will  be  the  only  op#on  in  those  states.  

Page 53: The dea regulations_final

Impact  of  Proposed  DEA  Regula#ons    

•  Con#nues  to  allow  law  enforcement  agencies  to  voluntarily  conduct  take-­‐back  events,  administer  mail-­‐back  programs,  and  maintain  collec#on  receptacles.  

•  NOT  ADDRESSED  in  the  regula#ons  is  the  need  to  be=er  educate  the  prescribers  to  minimize  the  quan##es  that  are  prescribed.