the city of colgach the warrior and columba the peacemaker
TRANSCRIPT
Fortnight Publications Ltd.
The City of Colgach the Warrior and Columba the PeacemakerAuthor(s): John HumeSource: Fortnight, No. 215 (Mar. 4 - 17, 1985), pp. 4, 12Published by: Fortnight Publications Ltd.Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25547717 .
Accessed: 25/06/2014 01:43
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Fortnight Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Fortnight.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.185 on Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:43:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
^BMBBBBBBKIl%?g??w*?^g|"*^BBBiiM8B /^aSs""^5^ "^s M^*i?frBBB>B*#M!5M
-j^^^^^^^^H
ij$^?fH^BS^^BBBSSSBB?SBBBBVSiSffl^Bs^ " **"^ * %* J 1
A view of old Derry from the Waterside._
THE CITY OF COLGACH THE WARRIOR
AND COLUMBA THE PEACEMAKER SDLP leader JOHN HUME writes that Derry has had long associations with conflict and presents a microcosm of the problems between Irish Catholics and Irish Protestants. However it is also the home of the Columban tradition, with its roots in both cultures.
DERBY
^B^B^B^B^B^B^B^B^^B^B^B^B^E^B^B^B^B^H J
[\* jHb^^SHJPPBB^^ "
VI-' -*p?-' JJllRR Y -
The Oak Grove - is a common
piacename in many parts of Ireland. When
used topographically by the ancient Irish,
it was always accompanied by a distinctive
epithet. Hence our Derry was first known
in pre-Christian times as kDoire colgach'.
Colgach was a warrior, a rather well
known one, as references to him in the
pages of Tacitus would indicate. From its
beginnings a significant place, it has had
long associations with conflict. It owes its
very existence to conflict. Its natural geog
raphy,with its military and trading advan
tages, were the reasons for its choice at the
beginning of the 17th century as the site of the walled city or fortress for the colonis
ation of north-west Ireland and the break
ing ofthe power of the Irish chieftains. By then it took on its third epithet- London
derry. Ironically London, in its derivation
meaning The fort of the ships', as to sum
up the siege tradition and mentality which has been such a force in the area, and
wider, ever since. In the name is summed
up the conflict that dominates Irish life
today. Whether in its original warlike name, its
sixth century monastic settlement by one
ofthe main figures of early Irish history, its London connection, its siege tradition, its
role as a major port of emigration to North
America, its location in post-partition Northern Ireland with Donegal at its back, or as the Achilles heel of the 1920 settle ment, it has always been a significant
place. The sharp wind of dissent has al
ways blown from the north-west.
Today it is in ways the microcosm of the
Irish problem. For some, the siege tradit
ion, the place where their battle was once
fought. For others, the place where their
battle is being fought now. Indeed it could be argued with some force that the conflict
which Derry symbolises, its significance as
a place, was underestimated for too long
by the rest of Ireland and rarely taken into
account in its calculations, particularly its
nationalist calculations. The underlying conflict of northern relationships, symbol ised starkly by the walled London found
ations dominating the Bogside, received
very little attention in Irish history from 1689 till it emerged on the centre of the
stage in 1912. It has been there ever since.
Yet all those intervening years and cen
turies were punctuated by the sectarian
conflict and killings in different parts of the North that were the ugly symptoms of
the continuous confrontation of the tradit
ions that still disfigure us today. It was only a year before he died that Parnell, a south
ern Protestant, learned an essential truth
of the importance of this conflict for the future of Ireland when he said in Belfast Treland can never have its freedom, Ire
land can never be united until the religious
prejudices of the minority are conciliated'.
Yet today there are those who believe that
the division of Ireland only started with
partition, thirty years after Parnell's
death.
The differences between the two tradit
ions in Ireland and in the North in par ticular, their weakness and their strengths, arc all here in Derry. It is here that one
senses the real problem of the Protestant
tradition, the real Irish problem. It is the
psychological sense of being a minority -
the source of the laager mentality, the root
of the fear -
which is the root of the pre
judice. Here too are the living symbols of
that mentality -
the walls, the physical memorial of the siege, the symbols of past
triumphs and triumphalism, the Bible and
the sword - the ever-present companions
in a settler's mind.
Our common tragedy has been our fail
ure to recognise that the first step towards
real unity between us is to accept our diff
erences, to cherish our diversity and to
mean it; that, of course, is the tragedy of
Ireland. We have pushed differences to
the point of division. Our challenge is to
believe and then to persuade, and to get the British to join the ranks of the per suaders. That accommodation of differ
ence - not conquest, not conversion -
is
our goal and is the true basis of a peaceful, stable and united country.
Throughout all the centuries, back to
546 AD, if there has been a common
thread, it is the thread of the Columban
tradition with its roots in both traditions.
Columba is accepted as the founder of
Derry, in spite of Colgach, geography
again influencing the choice of island site
for his monastic foundation. Colmcille -
the dove of the church - was the epithet
appended to Derry in his honour for many centuries before London arrived. He was
not unassociated with conflict either, hav
ing left Derry because of his perceived role in promoting conflict, and coming back
later, his only return, to settle conflict.
continued on page 10
4 Fortnight 3rd March 1985
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.185 on Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:43:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
BlBHBMBHBHBflBfllHBflBHBlB^B^H DERRY Paddy Doherty continued from page 11
the building with easy access to the library. So when you visit the library, you may excuse the cowboy books and detective
stories. Nobody had the heart to challenge her role, nor had they organised adequate finance to manage and develop the librarv.
If it was not for Paddy's daughter Ann's hard work, the investment of ?70,000 would be getting a very poor return.
Maybe when the dollar-laden Americans
arrive for the O'Doherty reunion in July some of them will see the potential of the
Heritage Library and organise adequate
funding for its further development.
Paddy would prefer that they would
take an interest in the O'Doherty Fort/
Interpretative Centre at the foot of Maga zine Street. Many people believe that
Paddy would never get planning permiss ion for it because of opposition from the
Historical Association who claimed it
lacked authenticity. One rumour is that he
only got it through because he agreed to
put badly needed public toilets on the
ground floor. Only time will tell whether his success in getting this built will record
for posterity his hindsight, his manipulat ive skills or his monumental ego.
Naturally a man of such energy and am
bition inspires a mixed reaction. For many
people he walks on water - the shrewd
manipulator, persuasive talker with an al
most legendary capacity for getting funds.
Some regard with amazement the capacity
I ^mkM,' i 'y^^^^^^^^mmMmmmmmmmmswml^At i **?&&/'/ TlM^^^^t^m^^M^MmmmiBwmmmmSSu
Paddy Doherty
of a man from the Bogside, a Catholic, a
Nationalist, to stand up with the best of
them in shaping the future of Derry. Many
people feel that his drive and ambition should be an inspiration to others to rise
above the endemic apathy that results
from the years of decisions made by face
less men.
However, there are others who feel that
his dictatorial style is nothing new. It's the
same old *on-your-bike', Norman Tebbitt
philosophy. There would seem to be a
contradiction in Paddy's espoused aim of
getting people to accept responsibility and
his own autocratic style of management.
Apart from Paddy's personal approach to running the various projects, the pro
jects themselves are not beyond question. The budget for the Youth and Community Workshop has been cut back because of
falling numbers of young people enrolling -
and this despite the ever-rising numbers
of unemployed young people. The Inner
City Project, under pressure to meet bank
repayments, is forced to charge high rents
even to its impecunious tenants, there is an
irony in the fact that Paddy recently went to Ethiopia for a few weeks to help famine
victimes, but he is forced to charge the
World Development Group ?45 a week for two rooms on the ground floor of a
terraced house in a back street. Despite all
the young people wandering the streets we
have no drop-in centre. We have no cent
ral library, no theatre, and yet we are go
ing to have a fort! Of course it's not Paddy Doherty's fault that we don't have any of
these much-needed facilities, but it does
highlight the inefficiency of a lot of pub licly-funded work in catering for real
needs.
In the struggle for change Paddy has chosen to work within the system rather
than against it, and anybody who has been
involved in any movement for change ' >vvs the proM..*
' ' ' '-,,.
all aware of the old adage -
"he who pays the piper calls the tune'
- but we often
forget that the idealist who refuses to
compromise often remains isolated, de
void of resources and ultimately ineffect
ive. Success in working within the system is when the compromises made are less
than the advantages gained. It is a sad fact of life that governments,
councils and other public bodies are all too
willing to throw money at problems so as
to be seen to be doing something, rather
than to look at the roots of the problem,
they are generally more willing to look at
large grandiose "top down' schemes. Thus
Derry was given the Richmond Centre as
if the problem here was a lack of shops rather than a lack of shoppers. In fact the
high overheads of such a centre makes it
an attractive proposition only for retail
chains which can bear the loss if the ven
ture is not successful. Meanwhile the trad
itional locally-owned retail outlets, al
ready under pressure, are forced out of
business.
Paddy's various projects were attractive
propositions to funding bodies because
they were all interrelated in a large scheme: craft village, fort, rejuvenated
city centre, skills training for young peo
ple, tourist development - it all looks very
good on paper. Some questions that occur
to me: can craft workshops evolve in an
environment where they have to compete with Boots for rented space? Will tourists
come to a folk village rather fchan to see the
place the paratroopers shot innocent peo
ple on Bloody Sunday? Will Americans be more prepared to invest in Derry than
people with money in Ballymena? What will our grandchildren say about O'Doh
erty's Fort? What advantages does the In
ner City Project offer prospective business
that past Unionist landlords didn't?
Paddy Doherty is a man of great drive and ambition who has put a lot of work
into making a dream come true. Only time
will tell whether he has beaten the system or whether another strong voice of protest has been co-opted onto the board of face
less men who decide our future.
Hume on Derry continued from page 4
The story oi that settlement has some rele vance today.
The clans of the Antrim Coast, the Dal
riada, insisted that their ties of blood and
kinship with the Dalriada in the west of Scotland meant that they owed their loy
alty and tribute to the King of Argyll. The clans in Derry and Tyrone insisted that they owed their loyalty to the High Kings of those lands where they lived. Columba averted disaster and the possibility of widespread conflict by proposing that they pay tribute to both. There was no con
quest, no conversion. They maintained their ties with their kinfolk across the
water while accepting their place in the
land where they lived. There is a message there for someone.
12 Fortnight 3rd March 1985
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.185 on Wed, 25 Jun 2014 01:43:52 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions